Title Page R.J. Pederson
Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 Chapter 7 Defining Puritans and Puritanism: Narrative and Metanarrative 7.1 Introduction While a sufficient definition of English Puritanism continues to elude historians, this has not stayed the use of the terms Puritan and Puritanism.1 In the first chapter we saw, briefly, how various historians have attempted to define Puritanism.2 We also saw that some leading historians, given the sheer difficulty of identifying a definition that is encompassing enough, are now referring to Puritanisms.3 This shift is not too different 1 Most English historians continue to employ “Puritan” and “Puritanism” with confidence. See, for instance, Patrick Collinson, Richard Bancroft and Elizabethan Anti-Puritanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 1-12; Bernard Capp, England’s Culture Wars: Puritan Reformation and Its Enemies in the Interregnum, 1649-1660 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 1-12; Andrew Cambers, Godly Reading: Print, Manuscript and Puritanism in England, 1580-1720 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 10-15; Michael P. Winship, Godly Republicanism: Puritans, Pilgrims, and a City on a Hill (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012); Arnold Hunt, The Art of Hearing: English Preachers and Their Audiences, 1590-1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 30-31; Catherine Gimelli Martin, Milton Among the Puritans: The Case for Historical Revisionism (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2010), 31-64; John Coffey and Paul C. H. Lim, “Introduction,” in The Cambridge Companion to Puritanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 1-18; Tom Webster, Godly Clergy in Early Stuart England: The Caroline Puritan Movement, c.1620-1643 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 1-8; N.
[Show full text]