DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study on the Building Techniques and Materials in the Late Antique and Byzantine Fortifications in Anatolia: Ancyra and Nicaea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A STUDY ON THE BUILDING TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS IN THE LATE ANTIQUE AND BYZANTINE FORTIFICATIONS IN ANATOLIA: ANCYRA AND NICAEA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MERCAN YAVUZATMACA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CONSERVATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN ARCHITECTURE DECEMBER 2016 Approval of the thesis: A STUDY ON THE BUILDING TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS IN THE LATE ANTIQUE AND BYZANTINE FORTIFICATIONS IN ANATOLIA: ANCYRA AND NICAEA submitted by MERCAN YAVUZATMACA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Architecture Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences ____________________ Prof. Dr. Elvan Altan Head of Department, Architecture _____________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk Serin Supervisor, Architecture Dept., METU _____________________ Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Suna Güven Architecture Department, METU ______________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk Serin Architecture Department, METU ______________________ Prof. Dr. Ayşıl Tükel Yavuz Architecture Department, METU. ______________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Namık Erkal Architecture Department, TED Uni. ______________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman Settlement Archeology Dept., METU ______________________ Date: 02.12.2016 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Mercan YAVUZATMACA Signature : iv ABSTRACT A STUDY ON THE BUILDING TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS IN THE LATE ANTIQUE AND BYZANTINE FORTIFICATIONS IN ANATOLIA: ANCYRA AND NICAEA Yavuzatmaca, Mercan M.Sc. in Conservation of Cultural Heritage, Department of Architecture Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk Serin December 2016, 221 pages This research aims to investigate building techniques and materials in the Late Antique and Byzantine fortifications of Anatolia through the selected case studies of Ancyra/Ankara and Nicaea/Iznik. The majority of Late Antique and Byzantine fortifications in Anatolia are distinguished by ashlar masonry, including quantities of spolia, with alternating courses of brick. The frequent appearance of brick, in combination with more-or-less regularly cut blocks or spolia, in the buildings and fortifications of Anatolia from the Late Roman through to the Byzantine periods (particularly from the ninth century onwards) creates difficulties in offering a precise dating for these structures. The citadel of Ankara, in terms of construction technique and materials, finds one of its closest parallels in the fortifications of Iznik. The major modification to the walls of Iznik, originally built in the third century AD, is attributed to Michael III, or precisely to the year 858 by the inscriptions. The eighth and ninth century phases of the walls of Iznik are characterized by rich quantities of spolia alternating with bands of brick. v Similarly, the rebuilding of the inner circuit of the Ankara fortifications, built of large blocks of spolia up to a height of eight-to-ten meters, capped above by alternating courses of brick and rubble stone, is attributed to the year 859. The rebuilding of the walls of both Ankara and Iznik were included in a large-scale program of fortification by the Emperor Michael III (842-867). A close examination of these two fortifications will help us understand the development of the variations in ashlar masonry and spolia, in combination with brick, and shed light on dating and restitution issues, assisting in determining appropriate conservation approaches, in other Late Antique and Byzantine fortifications in Anatolia. Keywords: Late Antique and Byzantine Fortifications, Ancyra, Nicaea, Construction Techniques, Building Materials. vi ÖZ ANADOLU’DAKİ GEÇ ANTİK VE BİZANS DÖNEMİ SURLARININ YAPIM TEKNİĞİ VE MALZEME BAKIMINDAN İNCELENMESİ: ANKARA VE İZNİK Yavuzatmaca, Mercan Yüksek Lisans, Kültürel Mirası Koruma, Mimarlık Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Doç. Dr. Ufuk Serin Aralık 2016, 221 sayfa Bu çalışma Anadolu’da bulunan Geç Antik ve Bizans dönemi surlarını yapım teknikleri ve malzemelerini bakımından Ankara ve Iznik kentleri aracılığıyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Anadolu’da bulunan Geç Antik ve Bizans dönemi surlarının büyük bir kısmı bol miktarda devşirme malzeme içeren kesme taşların tuğla sıralarıyla birlikte yaptığı almaşık dizilim ile diğerlerinden ayırt edilmektedirler. Kesme blok taşlarla ya da devşirme malzemelerle birlikte tuğla kullanımı Geç Roma döneminden Bizans dönemine kadar (özellikle dokuzuncu yüzyıldan itibaren) Anadolu’nun binalarında ve sur duvarlarında sıklıkla görülmektedir ve bu nedenle bu yapılar için kesin bir tarihleme yapmak zorlaşmaktadır. Ankara kalesine yapım tekniği ve malzeme bakımından en yakın sur duvarı Iznik surlarıdır. Iznik surları üçüncü yüzyılda inşa edilmiştir ve Michael III döneminde ya da yazıtlarda yazan kesin tarihi ile 858 yılında önemli bir değişim geçirmiştir. Iznik surları sekizinci ve dokuzuncu yüzyıllarda bol miktarda devşirme malzeme ile birlikte tuğla sıralarının almaşık dizilimi ile farklılık göstermektedir. vii Benzer bir şekilde, Ankara kalesi iç sur duvarında sekiz ile on metre yüksekliğe kadar devşirme malzemelerin kullanımı ve üst kısımlarında bulunan moloz taş ile tuğla sıralarının almaşık dizilimi ise 859 yılında yapılmış olan bir yeniden inşa dönemine atfedilmektedir. Ankara ve Iznik sur duvarlarının yeniden inşa edilmesi İmparator Michael III tarafından yapılmış olan büyük çaptaki sur çalışmalarına dahil edilmektedir. Bu iki sur duvarının yakından incelenmesi, tuğla ile birlikte devşirme malzeme ve kesme taş kullanımı çeşitliliğinin gelişimini anlamamıza yardımcı olacak, Anadolu’daki diğer Geç Antik ve Bizans dönemi surları için uygun koruma yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesinde ve tarihleme ve restitüsyon konularında ışık tutacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Geç Antik ve Bizans Dönemi Surları, Ankara, Iznik, Yapım Teknikleri, Yapı Malzemesi. viii To my beloved family and to all children of the world, whose right to life has been taken away. ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Many people have contributed to the thesis study and I would like to express my thanks to all of them. I would like to express my sincere gratitude and admiration to my advisor Assoc. Prof. Ufuk Serin, for her continuous support. Her patience, guidance, motivation and seminal criticism helped me throughout the time of researching and writing of this thesis. She became the source of inspiration for me to study the Late Antique and Byzantine periods. It was a great opportunity for me to know her as she has made important contributions to my academic life. I also would like to thank to rest of my thesis committee members, Prof. Dr. Ayşıl Tükel Yavuz, Prof. Dr. Suna Güven, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Namık Erkal and Assist. Prof. Dr. Çiğdem Atakuman, who made important contributions to my thesis, brought insightful and motivating comments and encouraged me to continue my works in this subject. I must express my very deepest gratitude to my cherished friends Günce Uzgören, Tuğba Sağıroğlu, Başak Kalfa and Ayşegül Akgün, who have provided the greatest support in finalizing my thesis work and have stood at my side. I thank to my fellow office colleagues Betül Kurtuluş, Meltem Erdil and Deniz Üçer for their endless support and concern. I thank also Filiz Diri Akyıldız, Öncü Güney, Nehir Akgün, Meltem Çetiner, Gökhan Okumuş, Gülnur Güler, Nilüfer Kızılkaya, Gonca Tunçbilek, Emine Çiğdem Asrav, Özgün Özçakır, Aynur Uluç and Neris Parlak for their support and tolerance in overcoming this difficult period. I owe many thanks also to Jonathan Smith for the final revision of the English text. I am very thankful to my dormitory mates Şükran Okur, Emine Aytekin, Günseli Durmaz, İrem Hafız, Öncü Özalp, Shabnam Mehrtash and Seden Demirtaş who revitalized me with their patience and psychological supports. I would like to thank to my friends Betül Özcan, Merve Nur Oymak, Mehtap Kaya, Esra Koç, E. Merve Cezlan, Müzeyyen Dindar, Mevlide Şan, Ayfer Yılmaz, Emel Durmaz, Serkan Yavuz and Fatma Dikçal, who did their best to support me and adorned my life even though x they were not near me when I was living in Ankara. I would like to thank to my dear niece H. İbrahim Korurer who stood by me for days during the field works in Iznik and Kadir Balı, who helped me to obtain some visuals about Iznik. I cannot finish this part without expressing my gratitude to Assist. Prof. Dr. M. Oğuz Sinemillioğlu, who has inspired me to make an academic career and has become a source of motivation with his trust in me since the years of my licentiate education. I would also like to thank to the Head of Department of Architecture, my professors in the Graduate Program in Conservation of Cultural Heritage and my colleagues. In addition, I must give thanks to Rüstem Taşman, Mücahit Erdem and Hamdi Kömürcü for bringing happiness and increasing our eagerness to work with their cheerfulness. Finally, I must express my very profound gratitude to my dear father Salman Yavuzatmaca, my mother Elif Yavuzatmaca and all members of my large family who throughout my life have always been with me with their love and supports and made me believe in myself when I felt powerless
Recommended publications
  • Spolia's Implications in the Early Christian Church

    Spolia's Implications in the Early Christian Church

    BEYOND REUSE: SPOLIA’S IMPLICATIONS IN THE EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH by Larissa Grzesiak M.A., The University of British Columba, 2009 B.A. Hons., McMaster University, 2007 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Art History) THE UNVERSIT Y OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2011 © Larissa Grzesiak, 2011 Abstract When Vasari used the term spoglie to denote marbles taken from pagan monuments for Rome’s Christian churches, he related the Christians to barbarians, but noted their good taste in exotic, foreign marbles.1 Interest in spolia and colourful heterogeneity reflects a new aesthetic interest in variation that emerged in Late Antiquity, but a lack of contemporary sources make it difficult to discuss the motives behind spolia. Some scholars have attributed its use to practicality, stating that it was more expedient and economical, but this study aims to demonstrate that just as Scripture became more powerful through multiple layers of meaning, so too could spolia be understood as having many connotations for the viewer. I will focus on two major areas in which spolia could communicate meaning within the context of the Church: power dynamics, and teachings. I will first explore the clear ecumenical hierarchy and discourses of power that spolia delineated through its careful arrangement within the church, before turning to ideological implications for the Christian viewer. Focusing on the Lateran and St. Peter’s, this study examines the religious messages that can be found within the spoliated columns of early Christian churches. By examining biblical literature and patristic works, I will argue that these vast coloured columns communicated ideas surrounding Christian doctrine.
  • THE LOGISTICS of the FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Wester

    THE LOGISTICS of the FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Wester

    FEEDING VICTORY: THE LOGISTICS OF THE FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 A Thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By William Donald O’Dell, Jr. Director: Dr. Vicki Szabo Associate Professor of Ancient and Medieval History History Department Committee Members: Dr. David Dorondo, History Dr. Robert Ferguson, History October, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members and director for their assistance and encouragements. In particular, Dr. Vicki Szabo, without whose guidance and feedback this thesis would not exist, Dr. David Dorondo, whose guidance on the roles of logistics in cavalry warfare have helped shaped this thesis’ handling of such considerations and Dr. Robert Ferguson whose advice and recommendations for environmental historiography helped shaped my understanding on how such considerations influence every aspect of history, especially military logistics. I also offer my warmest regards and thanks to my parents, brothers, and extended family for their continued support. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................................v Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca

    ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca

    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
  • The Little Metropolis at Athens 15

    The Little Metropolis at Athens 15

    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2011 The Littleetr M opolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia Paul Brazinski Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Brazinski, Paul, "The Little eM tropolis: Religion, Politics, & Spolia" (2011). Honors Theses. 12. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/12 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paul A. Brazinski iv Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank Professor Larson for her patience and thoughtful insight throughout the writing process. She was a tremendous help in editing as well, however, all errors are mine alone. This endeavor could not have been done without you. I would also like to thank Professor Sanders for showing me the fruitful possibilities in the field of Frankish archaeology. I wish to thank Professor Daly for lighting the initial spark for my classical and byzantine interests as well as serving as my archaeological role model. Lastly, I would also like to thank Professor Ulmer, Professor Jones, and all the other Professors who have influenced me and made my stay at Bucknell University one that I will never forget. This thesis is dedicated to my Mom, Dad, Brian, Mark, and yes, even Andrea. Paul A. Brazinski v Table of Contents Abstract viii Introduction 1 History 3 Byzantine Architecture 4 The Little Metropolis at Athens 15 Merbaka 24 Agioi Theodoroi 27 Hagiography: The Saints Theodores 29 Iconography & Cultural Perspectives 35 Conclusions 57 Work Cited 60 Appendix & Figures 65 Paul A.
  • On the Fall of Constantinople

    On the Fall of Constantinople

    On the Fall of Constantinople From the Diaries Nicolo Barbo, https://deremilitari.org/2016/08/the-siege-of-constantinople-in-1453-according-to-nicolo-barbaro/ accessed 17 November 2017. On the twenty-ninth of May, the last day of the siege, our towards the walls, so that they had the choice of dying on Lord God decided, to the sorrow of the Greeks, that He one side or the other; and when this first group was killed was willing for the city to fall on this day into the hands of and cut to pieces, the second group began to attack Mahomet Bey the Turk son of Murat, after the fashion and vigorously. The first group was sent forward for two in the manner described below; and also our eternal God reasons, firstly because they preferred that Christians was willing to make this decision in order to fulfill all the should die rather than Turks, and secondly to wear us out ancient prophecies, particularly the first prophecy made by in the city; and as I have said, when the first group was Saint Constantine, who is on horseback on a column by dead or wounded, the second group came on like lions the Church of Saint Sophia of this city, prophesying with unchained against the walls on the side of San Romano; his hand and saying, “From this direction will come the and when we saw this fearful thing, at once the tocsin was one who will undo me,” pointing to Anatolia, that is sounded through the whole city and at every post on the Turkey.
  • Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion

    Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion

    Vigiliae Christianae Vigiliae Christianae 66 (2012) 482-502 brill.com/vc Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion Mark Edwards Christ Church, Oxford, OX1 1DP, United Kingdom: [email protected] Abstract This paper responds to recent publications which play down the role of Bishop Alex- ander of Alexandria in securing the adoption of the term homoousion at the Nicene Council of 325. It argues that, while the term is not employed in any surviving work from his hand, there is some reason to believe that he sanctioned the use of it by his colleagues. There is no doubt that before the Council he had already declared the Son to be “from the Father’s essence”, and it is all but certain that when this phrase was challenged, together with the homoousion at Nicaea, it was he who produced a concil- iatory exegesis of both innovations, relying on the theology that had already been expounded in his letters Philostorgius’ story that he and Hosius of Cordoba had con- certed a plan to introduce the homoousion is not implausible, and it should not be assumed that the author of an anonymous life of Constantine, which corroborates this narrative, is merely paraphrasing Philostorgius. Their testimony is consistent with that of Ambrose of Milan, who can be shown to have been acquainted both with docu- ments and with witnesses of the proceedings at the Council. Keywords Nicaea, Alexander of Alexandria, homoousion, creed, Trinity, Eusebius of Nicomedia, Arius To whom do we owe the presence in the Nicene Creed of the adjective homoousios? There was a time when everyone would have held the opinion, lately endorsed again by Henry Chadwick, that “anti-Arian leaders” had already resolved to press it upon the Council of 325 before its opening.1 The parties to this compact were always assumed to have been Alexander 1) H.
  • Architectural Spolia and Urban Transformation in Rome from the Fourth to the Thirteenth Century

    Architectural Spolia and Urban Transformation in Rome from the Fourth to the Thirteenth Century

    Patrizio Pensabene Architectural Spolia and Urban Transformation in Rome from the Fourth to the Thirteenth Century Summary This paper is a historical outline of the practice of reuse in Rome between the th and th century AD. It comments on the relevance of the Arch of Constantine and the Basil- ica Lateranensis in creating a tradition of meanings and ways of the reuse. Moreover, the paper focuses on the government’s attitude towards the preservation of ancient edifices in the monumental center of Rome in the first half of the th century AD, although it has been established that the reuse of public edifices only became a normal practice starting in th century Rome. Between the th and th century the city was transformed into set- tlements connected to the principal groups of ruins. Then, with the Carolingian Age, the city achieved a new unity and several new, large-scale churches were created. These con- struction projects required systematic spoliation of existing marble. The city enlarged even more rapidly in the Romanesque period with the construction of a large basilica for which marble had to be sought in the periphery of the ancient city. At that time there existed a highly developed organization for spoliating and reworking ancient marble: the Cos- matesque Workshop. Keywords: Re-use; Rome; Arch of Constantine; Basilica Lateranensis; urban transforma- tion. Dieser Artikel bietet eine Übersicht über den Einsatz von Spolien in Rom zwischen dem . und dem . Jahrhundert n. Chr. Er zeigt auf, wie mit dem Konstantinsbogen und der Ba- silica Lateranensis eine Tradition von Bedeutungsbezügen und Strategien der Spolienver- wendung begründet wurde.
  • Download a Pdf File of This Issue for Free

    Download a Pdf File of This Issue for Free

    Issue 85: The Council of Nicaea: Debating Jesus’ Divinity Debating Jesus' Divinity: Did You Know? Interresting and Unusual Facts about the Council of Nicaea Compiled by Steven Gertz, D. H. Williams, and John Anthony McGuckin All Aboard? The Council of Nicaea lives on in the imagination of the Church, both East and West. In this photograph taken in 1925, Russian Orthodox patriarchs prepare to board a train for St. David's, Wales, to celebrate Nicaea's 16th centenary. In Rome that same year, Pope Pius XI planned a party of his own in the Vatican basilica, declaring Nicaea a formative event for the Catholic understanding of the nature of Christ. Protestants too have honored Nicaea in their own way. Anglicans, among others, recite the Nicene Creed in church every Sunday, and many Protestants (perhaps unknowingly) celebrate Nicaea in their hymns. One of the most beloved is Reginald Heber's "Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty," which ends with a rousing "God in Three Persons, blessed Trinity." Written for Trinity Sunday, the hymn was set to music by John B. Dykes, who named the tune "Nicaea." Wipe Out Those Arian Barbarians Theodosius the Great may have dealt a death blow to Arians in the Roman Empire at the Council of Constantinople (381), but the heresy got a new lease on life among the barbarian Goths. Particularly influential was Theodoric the Great (d. 526), a ruthless military tactician (he murdered his rival) who adopted Arianism as his religion and built numerous Arian churches in Raverina, Italy. When the Byzantine Emperor Justinian recovered Ravenna in 535, he resolved to erase any Arian influence from the city.
  • THE SPREAD of the Gospel in the BOOK of ACTS WELCOME to FELLOWSHIP PRAYER REQUESTS PRAYER TEAM

    THE SPREAD of the Gospel in the BOOK of ACTS WELCOME to FELLOWSHIP PRAYER REQUESTS PRAYER TEAM

    WITNESSES THE SPREAD OF THE gospel IN THE BOOK OF ACTS WELCOME TO FELLOWSHIP PRAYER REQUESTS PRAYER TEAM WITNESSES THE SPREAD OF THE gospel IN THE BOOK OF ACTS Questions for WITNESSES Why do we come to church (if you do)? Regular attender or regular misser? How is the truth communicated best? Are you readyActs to receive 17 and evaluate? In the second century BC, the Romans built a highway called the via Egnatia from Dyrrachium on the Adriatic Sea to Byzantium (now called Constantinople) near the Black Sea, a distance of almost 700 miles. Nearly 20 feet wide and paid with hand laid stone slabs, it carried Roman troops to battle, and merchandise everywhere. Chuck Swindoll PAUL’S SECOND MISSIONARY JOURNEY c. AD 49 – 52 (Ac 15:3 9 –18:22) THRACE Black Sea A C E D O N N D P O N T US M I A A Philippi Byzantium I A Amphipolis Neapolis N Thessalonica Y Samothrace Nicaea H A Berea Apollonia T t I I A Gulf on I sp Prusa B C lle T He O A Troas A Dorylaeum D e MYSIA g e L A a Thyatira A n I P A A C H A I G Pisidian P A S ASIA e G a Y Antioch A Athens Ephesus . Corinth R C s Iconium t H Cilician M Saronic Lystra Cenchreae P Gates Derbe I A s Gulf Sila u C nd s l a I Pau n L Tarsus a I m C Seleucia A Rhodes Pieria Antioch S Y as ab R CRETE S arn k U B ar .
  • Fall of Constantinople] Pmunc 2018 ​ ​ Contents

    Fall of Constantinople] Pmunc 2018 ​ ​ Contents

    [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ CONTENTS Letter from the Chair and CD………....…………………………………………....[3] Committee Description…………………………………………………………….[4] The Siege of Constantinople: Introduction………………………………………………………….……. [5] Sailing to Byzantium: A Brief History……...………....……………………...[6] Current Status………………………………………………………………[9] Keywords………………………………………………………………….[12] Questions for Consideration……………………………………………….[14] Character List…………………...………………………………………….[15] Citations……..…………………...………………………………………...[23] 2 [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ LETTER FROM THE CHAIR Dear delegates, Welcome to PMUNC! My name is Atakan Baltaci, and I’m super excited to conquer a city! I will be your chair for the Fall of Constantinople Committee at PMUNC 2018. We have gathered the mightiest commanders, the most cunning statesmen and the most renowned scholars the Ottoman Empire has ever seen to achieve the toughest of goals: conquering Constantinople. This Sultan is clever and more than eager, but he is also young and wants your advice. Let’s see what comes of this! Sincerely, Atakan Baltaci Dear delegates, Hello and welcome to PMUNC! I am Kris Hristov and I will be your crisis director for the siege of Constantinople. I am pleased to say this will not be your typical committee as we will focus more on enacting more small directives, building up to the siege of Constantinople, which will require military mobilization, finding the funds for an invasion and the political will on the part of all delegates.. Sincerely, Kris Hristov 3 [FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE] PMUNC 2018 ​ ​ COMMITTEE DESCRIPTION The year is 1451, and a 19 year old has re-ascended to the throne of the Ottoman Empire. Mehmed II is now assembling his Imperial Court for the grandest city of all: Constantinople! The Fall of Constantinople (affectionately called the Conquest of Istanbul by the Turks) was the capture of the Byzantine Empire's capital by the Ottoman Empire.
  • Let's Sue Them All! the Byzantine Disaster. Grade 7 Lesson. Schools of California Online Resources

    Let's Sue Them All! the Byzantine Disaster. Grade 7 Lesson. Schools of California Online Resources

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 457 064 SO 031 525 AUTHOR Otto, Gina TITLE Let's Sue Them All! The Byzantine Disaster. Grade 7 Lesson. Schools of California Online Resources for Education (SCORE): Connecting California's Classrooms to the World. INSTITUTION San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, CA. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 38p. AVAILABLE FROM Schools of California Online Resources for Education, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, 601 North East Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410-3093. E-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://score.rims.k12.ca.us. For full text: http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/activity/academy/index.htm. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Case Method (Teaching Technique); *Cultural Context; Curriculum Enrichment; *European History; Foreign Countries; Grade 7; Interdisciplinary Approach; Junior High Schools; *Middle Eastern History; Non Western Civilization; *Role Playing; Social Studies; Writing Assignments IDENTIFIERS *Ottoman Empire; *Roman Empire ABSTRACT Who is responsible for loss of life and property when one empire is conquered by another? It is the year 1473 A.D., 20 years after the fall of Constantinople. On May 29, 1453, the Eastern Roman Empire came to an end with the military takeover of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks. How could an empire cease to exist? What were the people in and around the area doing in its final days? History does not occur in a vacuum. What occurs in one place effects others and can be partially caused by the actions or non-actions of neighbors.
  • Joint Meeting and Field Trip of IGCP 610 and INQUA POCAS Focus Group, Antalya, Turkey, 14-21 October 2018

    Joint Meeting and Field Trip of IGCP 610 and INQUA POCAS Focus Group, Antalya, Turkey, 14-21 October 2018

    Joint Meeting and Field Trip of IGCP 610 and INQUA POCAS Focus Group, Antalya, Turkey, 14-21 October 2018 TECTONICALLY MODIFIED COASTAL SHORELINE IN THE MARMARA REGION, NW TURKEY: EVIDENCE FROM THE ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE Koral, H. 1, Tur, H.2 Aydıngün, Ş. 3, and İşbil, D., 1 1Istanbul University, Department of Geological Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey 34320, hkoral @istanbul.edu.tr ; [email protected] 2İstanbul University, Department of Geophysical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey 34320 [email protected] 3Kocaeli University, Department of Archaeology, Izmit, Turkey 41380 [email protected] Keywords: Coastal modification, North Anatolian Fault Zone, Prince Islands, KüçükÇek- mece Lagoon, Iznik Lake, Byzantine Establishment Active tectonic structures are present along the coast of the Marmara Sea and surrounding areas, extensively modifying the Neogene-Quaternary sequence (e.g., Barka and Ka- dinsky-Cade,1988, Koral and Şen, 1995, Koral, 1998). The units were folded and faulted by neotectonic structures, some of which are linked to the seismically active North Anato- lian Fault Zone (NAFZ). Proximity of a submerged or elevated ancient settlement to the nearby active tectonic feature is evidence for a tectonically induced coastal change in the Marmara region (Fig. 1). A small submerged rocky mass named ‘Yıldız Kayalıkları/Vordonisi’ is one the Prince Islands, located about 1 km south of the Asian coast of the city of Istanbul in the Marmara Sea (Fig. 1). The Prince Islands comprise nine closely spaced islands with unique tectonic geological features (e.g., Isbil, 2012; Tur, 2007). Historical records and underwater searches indicate ‘Vordonisi’ is said to have supported a monastery during the Byzantine time, circa 850 AD, which now lies submerged under several meters of water (Meriç, 2010).