CIVIL SOCIETY & COUNTER-TERRORISM This briefing is a summary of the 2019 Human Rights Council report (A/HRC/40/52) of the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism. The report focuses on the role of measures to address terrorism and violent extremism on closing civic space and violating the rights of civil society actors and human rights defenders. THE PROBLEM Since 2001, civil society all around the globe has been experiencing restrictions on its work. There has been an increase in the adoption of security measures to counter terrorism and violent extremism which has resulted in the restriction of civic freedoms. These restrictions 4% and limitations hamper meaningful efforts to counter terrorism, as civil society has proven essential in addressing and preventing the conditions conducive to terrorism.
THE CAUSE Percentage of the global population living in areas The UN Security Council has failed to explicitly define terrorism and where civic space is open, violent extremism despite requiring States to adopt measures aimed according to CIVICUS at preventing such conduct. This results in overly broad and vague definitions of terrorism in national legislation around the globe, including laws to curb extremism. In addition, there are no systematic humanitarian exemptions for protecting civil society and humanitarian actors operating in challenging environments. THE IMPACT Current counter-terrorism framework enables: • Repressive national measures against lawful non-violent activities of civil society and the targeting of “undesirable” individuals within civil society. • National legal provisions that restrict rights that are key to civil society: freedom of expression and opinion, freedom of association, freedom of assembly, and freedom of religion. • Limiting civil society access to financial services, refusal to open or arbitrary closure of bank accounts, inordinate delays or termination of transactions, and onerous administrative requirements. • Instances of verbal criticism of and disagreement with the State, the government, or its authorities being considered as an act of terrorism. • Governmental smear campaigns, through State-controlled media or through statements by public officials whose objective is to delegitimize civil society and tarnish their reputation, by loosely characterizing them as “terrorists,” implying that they are “threats to national security” or “enemies of the State.” • Many activities of civil society, human rights defenders, journalists, bloggers, and political opponents falling under laws whose stated purpose is to counter-terrorism, prevent and counter violent extremism, and protect 66% national security. Existence of these measures, and their use against some civil society actors is Percentage of sufficient to silence those who are targeted and send a message to all other civil communications sent by the mandate that have dealt with society actors that they too are at risk, creating a chilling effect on civil society the use of counter-terrorism space. measures against civil society
JV European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL) • http://ecnl.org/ • [email protected] • Twitter: @enablingNGOlaw UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/terrorism/pages/srterrorismindex.aspx
Center for Not-for-Profit Law. The project is supported by Oak Foundation. Foundation. Oak by supported is project The Law. Not-for-Profit for Center
rules” managed by the European Center for Not-for-Profit Law and implemented in partnership with the Human Security Collective and the International International the and Collective Security Human the with partnership in implemented and Law Not-for-Profit for Center European the by managed rules”
This publication is produced under the project “Combatting Restrictions on Civic Freedoms arising from counter-terrorism & anti-money laundering laundering anti-money & counter-terrorism from arising Freedoms Civic on Restrictions “Combatting project the under produced is publication This
adverse impact of proposed measures. proposed of impact adverse
global security frameworks security global terrorism and PCVE, advising on the possible possible the on advising PCVE, and terrorism
2. 4.
on the crisis it faces resulting from the current current the from resulting faces it crisis the on all Security Council resolutions on counter- on resolutions Council Security all
Civil society must creatively raise awareness awareness raise creatively must society Civil Civil society must be engaged in developing developing in engaged be must society Civil
support to terrorism. to support
and an abuse of the rule of law by States. by law of rule the of abuse an and assistance must never be conceptualized as as conceptualized be never must assistance
3. 1. clarify that humanitarian protection and and protection humanitarian that clarify law of misuse a as addressed urgently be must
The UN Security Council should expressly expressly should Council Security UN The society civil of repression and Criminalization
Any effective counter-terrorism strategy must strengthen, not weaken, civil society. civil weaken, not strengthen, must strategy counter-terrorism effective Any
COUNTER-TERRORISM STRATEGIES COUNTER-TERRORISM
EFFECTIVE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
. For a summary of the research, research, the of summary a For . here click research, the read To . here click
number of terrorist attacks within a country. a within attacks terrorist of number
restrictions on civil society reduce the the reduce society civil on restrictions
has shown there is no evidence that legal legal that evidence no is there shown has
country safe from terrorist attacks - research research - attacks terrorist from safe country
Civil society restrictions do not make a a make not do restrictions society Civil
security legislation security
where human rights defenders were charged under under charged were defenders rights human where 2018 and 2001 between legislation terrorism
Percentage of cases tracked by Front Line Defenders Defenders Line Front by tracked cases of Percentage counter- adopted which governments of Number 58%
“ 140 IN NUMBERS: COUNTER-TERRORISM LAWS LOOM LARGE LOOM LAWS COUNTER-TERRORISM NUMBERS: IN