Summary of Aquatic Resource Information for Gwaii Haanas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of Aquatic Resource Information for Gwaii Haanas Summary of Aquatic Resource Information for Gwaii Haanas A Compilation and Synthesis of Aquatic Inventories for Lakes and Streams Prepared for: Parks Canada Gwaii Haanas / South Moresby National Park Reserve Prepared by: Brian Krishka, Aquatics Consultant Queen Charlotte City, B. C. March 27, 1997 ABSTRACT A review of available inventory and assessment information pertaining to streams and lakes within Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve was completed. The status of aquatic biophysical information was summarized, data gaps were identified and recommendations for future monitoring and research are made. Gwaii Haanas encompasses 147,271 ha of land along the southern portion of Haida Gwaii/Queen Charlotte Islands, including much of Moresby Island plus many smaller islands. This region consists of rugged terrain associated with the San Christoval Mountain Range along the length of Gwaii Haanas. Of the 779 watersheds found in the Protected Area, almost half are 50-100 ha in size. Over 1,400 streams exist, the majority being small, 1st order streams without lakes in the watershed. Nine fish species have been recorded from streams along both coasts. Three species of adult Pacific salmon (chum, pink, sockeye) are only found in streams during the fall spawning migrations, and their young return to the ocean soon after hatching each spring. Coho salmon fry and juveniles remain within streams and lakes for longer periods. There are 118 lakes ranging in size from 1-228 ha, plus hundreds of open-water areas under 1 ha. Eight fish species are known to reside within Gwaii Haanas lakes, mainly at lower elevations of 50 m or less above sea level. Threespine stickleback occur within low elevation lakes and stream reaches. Dolly Varden is the most common salmonid in these lakes, and is frequently the only fish species found at higher elevations or above major obstructions such as water falls. Rainbow trout are known to live year-round within several lakes, but migratory steelhead trout are also present at certain times of the year. Salmon abundance estimates from spawning streams supports the general decline in salmon numbers observed for west coast fisheries. Chum salmon use the vast majority of Gwaii Haanas streams for fall spawning, while coho and pink salmon use less than one-third of these streams. Within the last five years, chum salmon numbers have dropped to 10% of their abundance from the late 1940s. The number of spawning pink salmon increased by the late 1960s and remained relatively high until a steady decline began in 1988. The overall productivity of Gwaii Haanas lakes and streams is quite low. The biomass input to these freshwater systems via migratory salmon may be vital to continued survival of fish, invertebrates, certain birds and mammals, as well as overall productivity in riparian areas. Currently, only three of 118 lakes have been surveyed, and another 32 lakes have limited information available. Recent surveys also exist for 22 of over 1,400 streams and similar information is available for another 166 streams, but has not been summarized for comparison with recent surveys. In either case, a very small number of lakes and streams have appropriate information to properly compare and summarize the aquatic SUMMARY OF AQUATIC RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR GWAII HAANAS - MARCH 27, 1997 I resources of Gwaii Haanas. Future inventory and monitoring is needed on a seasonal basis to understand temporal biophysical dynamics for these waters. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................I LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. IV LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................... VI LIST OF APPENDICES ......................................................................................... VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS..........................................................................................................6 2.1 GENERAL APPROACH..........................................................................................6 2.1.1 Lake Surveys..............................................................................................6 2.1.2 Stream Surveys ..........................................................................................8 2.1.3 Salmon Escapement..................................................................................11 3.0 RESULTS .........................................................................................................13 3.1 LAKES............................................................................................................13 3.1.1 General....................................................................................................13 3.1.2 Physical....................................................................................................15 3.1.3 Chemical ..................................................................................................17 3.1.4 Fauna.......................................................................................................19 3.1.4.1 Fish....................................................................................................19 3.1.4.2 Mammals............................................................................................25 3.1.4.3 Avifauna..............................................................................................26 3.1.4.4 Aquatic Macro-invertebrates.................................................................28 3.1.4.5 Zooplankton........................................................................................29 3.1.4.6 Amphibians .........................................................................................30 3.1.5 Flora ........................................................................................................30 3.1.5.1 Aquatic Macrophytes ...........................................................................30 3.1.5.2 Terrestrial Plants.................................................................................31 3.2 STREAMS ........................................................................................................32 3.2.1 General....................................................................................................32 3.2.2 Physical....................................................................................................35 3.2.3 Chemical ..................................................................................................39 3.2.4 Fauna.......................................................................................................40 3.3.4.1 Fish....................................................................................................40 3.2.4.2 Mammals............................................................................................52 SUMMARY OF AQUATIC RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR GWAII HAANAS - MARCH 27, 1997 II 3.2.4.3 Avifauna..............................................................................................52 3.2.4.4 Aquatic Macro-invertebrates.................................................................53 3.2.4.5 Amphibians .........................................................................................56 3.2.5 Flora ........................................................................................................56 3.3 SALMON ESCAPEMENT ......................................................................................60 4.0 DISCUSSION....................................................................................................66 4.1 LAKES............................................................................................................66 4.1.1 Comparative Results .................................................................................66 4.1.2 Data Gaps................................................................................................67 4.2 STREAMS ........................................................................................................69 4.2.1 Comparative Results .................................................................................69 4.2.2 Data Gaps................................................................................................70 4.3 ECOLOGICAL SYNTHESIS ....................................................................................72 5.0 RESEARCH AND MONITORING ISSUES AND PRIORITIES................................75 6.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................77 7.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................81 8.0 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................85 SUMMARY OF AQUATIC RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR GWAII HAANAS - MARCH 27, 1997 III LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Locations and boundaries of Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve/Haida Heritage Site in relation to Haida Gwaii/Queen Charlotte Islands and mainland British Columbia. ........................................................................................2
Recommended publications
  • List of Insect Type Specimens in the Entomological Collection of the Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, No
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 29 Number 4 Article 3 12-31-1969 List of insect type specimens in the entomological collection of the Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, No. IV Vasco M. Tanner Brigham Young University Don R. Harris Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Tanner, Vasco M. and Harris, Don R. (1969) "List of insect type specimens in the entomological collection of the Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, No. IV," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 29 : No. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol29/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. LIST OF INSECT TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE ENTOMOLOGICAE COLLECTION OF THE BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY. PROVO. UTAH. NO. IV. Vasco M. Tanner' and Don R. Harris- There is a tendency at present in the biological sciences to shy away from systematics in favor of molecular biolof^ical studies. The Linnaoan system of dealing with the multitudinous forms of aiumate nature is being seriously questioned. Today, biologists are concerned with the synthesis of the living environment at levels of organiza- tion such as the "biota, community, population, organism, cell, and molecule."' No doubt emphasis in this line of endeavor will prove to be revealing as to the similarity and unity of organisms. As ad- vancements are made in this new approach to understanding the basic makeup of organisms, their similarity and life processes, there will still be a need for recognizing the great diversity of life forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoethnobotany of Kilgii Gwaay: a 10,700 Year Old Ancestral Haida Archaeological Wet Site
    Paleoethnobotany of Kilgii Gwaay: a 10,700 year old Ancestral Haida Archaeological Wet Site by Jenny Micheal Cohen B.A., University of Victoria, 2010 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Anthropology Jenny Micheal Cohen, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Supervisory Committee Paleoethnobotany of Kilgii Gwaay: A 10,700 year old Ancestral Haida Archaeological Wet Site by Jenny Micheal Cohen B.A., University of Victoria, 2010 Supervisory Committee Dr. Quentin Mackie, Supervisor (Department of Anthropology) Dr. Brian David Thom, Departmental Member (Department of Anthropology) Dr. Nancy Jean Turner, Outside Member (School of Environmental Studies) ii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Quentin Mackie, Supervisor (Department of Anthropology) Dr. Brian David Thom, Departmental Member (Department of Anthropology) Dr. Nancy Jean Turner, Outside Member (School of Environmental Studies) This thesis is a case study using paleoethnobotanical analysis of Kilgii Gwaay, a 10,700- year-old wet site in southern Haida Gwaii to explore the use of plants by ancestral Haida. The research investigated questions of early Holocene wood artifact technologies and other plant use before the large-scale arrival of western redcedar (Thuja plicata), a cultural keystone species for Haida in more recent times. The project relied on small- scale excavations and sampling from two main areas of the site: a hearth complex and an activity area at the edge of a paleopond. The archaeobotanical assemblage from these two areas yielded 23 plant taxa representing 14 families in the form of wood, charcoal, seeds, and additional plant macrofossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Lovebug Plecia Nearcticahardy (Insecta: Diptera: Bibionidae)1 H
    EENY 47 Lovebug Plecia nearcticaHardy (Insecta: Diptera: Bibionidae)1 H. A. Denmark, F. W. Mead, and T. R. Fasulo2 Introduction University of Florida entomologists introduced this species into Florida. However, Buschman (1976) documented the The lovebug, Plecia nearctica Hardy, is a bibionid fly species progressive movement of this fly species around the Gulf that motorists may encounter as a serious nuisance when Coast into Florida. Research was conducted by University traveling in southern states. It was first described by Hardy of Florida and US Department of Agriculture entomologists (1940) from Galveston, Texas. At that time he reported it to only after the lovebug was well established in Florida. be widely spread, but more common in Texas and Louisiana than other Gulf Coast states. Figure 1. Swarm of lovebugs, Plecia nearctica Hardy, on flowers. Credits: James Castner, UF/IFAS Figure 2. Adult lovebugs, Plecia nearctica Hardy, swarm on a building. Credits: Debra Young, used with permission Within Florida, this fly was first collected in 1949 in Escambia County, the westernmost county of the Florida panhandle. Today, it is found throughout Florida. With numerous variations, it is a widely held myth that 1. This document is EENY 47, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date August 1998. Revised April 2015. Reviewed February 2021. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the lastest version of this publication. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at http://entnemdept.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/. 2. H. A. Denmark, courtesy professor; F.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 Fishing in Washington Sport Fishing Rules Pamphlet
    Sport Fishing Rules Pamphlet Corrections and Updates July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 Last updated June 28, 2017. Marine Area Rules Page 98, LANDING A FISH - A club or dipnet (landing net) may be used to assist landing a legal fish taken by legal gear. A gaff may only be used to land a legally hooked LINGCOD (in Marine Areas 1-3 and 4 West of Bonilla-Tatoosh line), HALIBUT, TUNA, or DOGFISH SHARK that will be retained. HALIBUT may be shot or harpooned while landing. Photo By Scott Mayfield General Information Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) Dr. Jim Unsworth, Director Ron Warren, Assistant Director, Fish Program Contents General Information General Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission GENERAL RULES & INFORMATION Dr. Bradley Smith, Chair, Bellingham Jay Kehne, Omak Contact Information ..................................2 Larry Carpenter, Vice Chair, Mount Vernon Miranda Wecker, Naselle Update From WDFW ................................3 Barbara Baker, Olympia Kim Thorburn, Spokane Statewide General Rules .........................4 Jay Holzmiller, Anatone David Graybill, Leavenworth Salmon and Trout Handling Rules ............5 Rules Robert “Bob” Kehoe, Seattle License Information ...............................6-7 Catch Record Cards .................................8 Freshwater Catch Record Card Codes .......................9 How to Use This Pamphlet Definitions ..........................................10-11 FRESHWATER GENERAL RULES This pamphlet is effective July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 Statewide Freshwater Rules..............13-15 and contains information you need to legally fish throughout RIVERS .............................................17-73 Washington State (see WAC summary information below). Special Rules Introduction ..................17 Puget Sound Puget Puget Sound and Coast Rivers - Rivers & Coast 1 Read the General Information Pages. Special Rules ...................................18-46 Read the Licensing and Catch Record Card information.
    [Show full text]
  • Eulachon – a Fish Unique to Our West Coast
    Eulachon – A Fish Unique to Our West Coast Eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus) – also known as candlefish, oolichan, hooligan, salvation fish, or Columbia River smelt - are only found in marine waters, coastal rivers, and estuaries from northern California to Alaska. Because of their high oil content and nutritional value, Eulachon provide important food for many fishes, birds, and marine mammals. They are historically, economically, and culturally significant as a resource for indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest, and also support limited and strictly regulated non- tribal fisheries. Eulachon populations in California, Washington, and Oregon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Eulachon Distribution Note the adipose fin – all true smelt have one Photo: Jen Zamon, NOAA Life Cycle Eulachon are anadromous - they hatch in Fraser River freshwater rivers, migrate to live in the ocean for several Adult Eulachon, 195 mm. Ridges (striations) on the gill cover years, return to freshwater to spawn, and die after (operculum) are an identifying mark spawning. Adults are broadcast spawners; they spread eggs and milt over fine sands but do not construct nests (redds). One female produces an average of 32,000 tiny, Photo: Jen Zamon, NOAA 1 mm (<1/10th of an inch) eggs. Eulachon eggs stick to Elwha River sand grains, and depending on river temperatures, hatch Threats to Eulachon Survival in 20-40 days. The 4-7mm (~ ¼ inch) hatchlings (larvae) Quileute River are flushed downstream by river flow. Fish live on their The most serious threats to Eulachon survival include yolk sac reserves for about 5 days. With luck, after 5 days • rapid climate change in ocean and freshwater habitats, they reach the estuary and can begin feeding on small • damming and water diversion, and Quinault River diatoms (microscopic plants) before they enter the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Status Review of Eulachon and Pacific Lamprey in the Klamath River Basin
    A preliminary status review of eulachon and Pacific lamprey in the Klamath River Basin Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program 159OO Hwy 101 N Klamath CA 95548 Zachary S. Larson Michael R. Belchik April I998 INTRODUCTION Eulachon (Thaleicthys pacificus) and Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) are two species of anadromous fish found throughout the northwestern United States and western Canada that have received little attention relative to salmonid species. Consequently, with few exceptions, very little is known of their status or population trends. Eulachon are one of several species of smelts (Osmeridae) that occur off the coast of California. Their spawning migration takes them further into freshwater inlets than any other smelt within their range. They are prized by many tribes of the Pacific Northwest for their taste, and have been tied to tribal culture for centuries. Pacific lamprey are also harvested and considered a delicacy by tribes of the Pacific Northwest; however, lamprey migrate further up rivers and tributaries to spawn than do eulachon, often utilizing habitat hundreds of miles inland from the ocean (Scott and Crossman 1973). On the Klamath River of northwest California (Fig. l), eulachon and Pacific lamprey are of great importance to the Yurok Tribe but runs have diminished in the past few decades and no efforts have been made to determine factors contributing to apparent declines. Eulachon have apparently disappeared in the Klamath River and other nearby coastal drainages -- only a handful of fish have been witnessed since 1988 (CDFG unpublished data 1988-89, YTFP 1998). Pacific lamprey have exhibited a more gradual decline but little quantitative evidence is available.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Codes: Fmp Prohibited Species and Cr Crab
    Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, Table 2c TABLE 2b TO PART 679—SPECIES CODES: FMP PROHIBITED SPECIES AND CR CRAB Species Description Code CR Crab Groundfish PSC CRAB Box ....................................... Lopholithodes mandtii .......... 900 ✓ Dungeness ........................... Cancer magister .................. 910 ✓ King, blue ............................. Paralithodes platypus .......... 922 ✓ ✓ King, golden (brown) ........... Lithodes aequispinus ........... 923 ✓ ✓ King, red .............................. Paralithodes camtshaticus ... 921 ✓ ✓ King, scarlet (deepsea) ....... Lithodes couesi .................... 924 ✓ Korean horsehair crab ......... Erimacrus isenbeckii ............ 940 ✓ Multispinus crab ................... Paralomis multispinus .......... 951 ✓ Tanner, Bairdi ...................... Chionoecetes bairdi ............. 931 ✓ ✓ Tanner, grooved .................. Chionoecetes tanneri ........... 933 ✓ Tanner, snow ....................... Chionoecetes opilio ............. 932 ✓ ✓ Tanner, triangle ................... Chionoecetes angulatus ...... 934 ✓ Verrilli crab ........................... Paralomis verrilli .................. 953 ✓ PACIFIC HALIBUT Hippoglossus stenolepis ...... 200 ✓ PACIFIC HERRING Family Clupeidae ................. 235 ✓ SALMON Chinook (king) ..................... Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 410 ✓ Chum (dog) .......................... Oncorhynchus keta .............. 450 ✓ Coho (silver) ........................ Oncorhynchus kisutch ......... 430 ✓ Pink (humpback) .................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 12-17: Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola – Diptera Overview. Chapt. 12-17. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. 12-17-1 Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 12-17 TERRESTRIAL INSECTS: HOLOMETABOLA – DIPTERA BIOLOGY AND HABITATS TABLE OF CONTENTS Diptera Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 12-17-2 Role of Bryophytes ................................................................................................................................. 12-17-3 Collection and Extraction Methods ......................................................................................................... 12-17-6 Fly Dispersal of Spores ........................................................................................................................... 12-17-8 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................................ 12-17-13 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................... 12-17-13 Forests ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, Table 2D
    Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, Table 2d Chum (dog) .......................... Oncorhynchus keta .............. 450 ✓ Coho (silver) ........................ Oncorhynchus kisutch ......... 430 ✓ Pink (humpback) .................. Oncorhynchus gorbuscha .... 440 ✓ Sockeye (red) ...................... Oncorhynchus nerka ........... 420 ✓ STEELHEAD TROUT Oncorhynchus mykiss ......... 540 ✓ [73 FR 76172, Dec. 15, 2008] TABLE 2c TO PART 679—SPECIES CODES: FMP FORAGE FISH SPECIES (ALL SPECIES OF THE FOLLOWING FAMILIES) Species Description Code Bristlemouths, lightfishes, and anglemouths (family Gonostomatidae) 209 Capelin smelt (family Osmeridae) 516 Deep-sea smelts (family Bathylagidae) 773 Eulachon smelt (family Osmeridae) 511 Gunnels (family Pholidae) 207 Krill (order Euphausiacea) 800 Laternfishes (family Myctophidae) 772 Pacific sandfish (family Trichodontidae) 206 Pacific sand lance (family Ammodytidae) 774 Pricklebacks, war-bonnets, eelblennys, cockscombs and shannys (family Stichaeidae) 208 Surf smelt (family Osmeridae) 515 [70 FR 75083, Dec. 19, 2005] TABLE 2d TO PART 679—SPECIES CODES—NON-FMP SPECIES General use Species description Code Arctic char, anadromous ............................................................................................................................................... 521 Dolly varden, anadromous ............................................................................................................................................ 531 Eels or eel-like fish .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HMSC Currents
    August/September2008 HMSC Currents Newsletter of the Hatfield Marine Science Center Community - Newport OR Interns wrap up busy summer Offshore Aquaculture is focus This has been the Hatfield Center’s “summer of interns”, as HMSC Aca- demic Programs Coordinator Itchung Cheung called it, with 19 participants of September HMSC Forum in five different internship programs at HMSC since June. Ten of those The Hatfield Marine Science Center is hosting a were Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) interns, supported by two-day forum that will explore the feasibility of de- a National Science Foundation grant that included 12 additional students in veloping offshore aquaculture programs in the Pacific Corvallis, mentored by COAS faculty. The Newport REU interns worked in Northwest on September 9-10, 2008. various HMSC labs and spent time in the field, presenting the results of their Fisheries and Wildlife Professor Chris Langdon, 10-week research projects at a symposium at the on August 21. coordinator of the forum, says the event is designed to be informational and will explore the potential continued on page 6 rewards as well as the downsides of offshore aquacul- ture in this region. “Global population is estimated to increase by 50 percent in the next 40-50 years and commercial fish stocks around the world are at or above sustainable harvest levels,” Langdon said. “We need to explore other avenues of seafood production if we are going to maintain current levels of per capita consump- tion. However, expansion of offshore aquaculture in the United States would require a strong regulatory framework with environmental safeguards to protect natural resources and ensure consumer safety.
    [Show full text]
  • En La Nomenclatura De Taxones Paleontológicos Y Zoológicos
    Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat., 114, 2020: 177-209 Desenfado (e incluso humor) en la nomenclatura de taxones paleontológicos y zoológicos Casualness (and even humor) in the nomenclature of paleontological and zoological taxa Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Marco Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM) y Área de Paleontología GEODESPAL, Facultad CC. Geológicas, José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid. [email protected] Recibido: 25 de mayo de 2020. Aceptado: 7 de agosto de 2020. Publicado electrónicamente: 9 de agosto de 2020. PALABRAS CLAVE: Nombres científicos, Nomenclatura binominal, CINZ, Taxonomía, Paleontología, Zoología. KEY WORDS: Scientific names, Binominal nomenclature, ICZN, Taxonomy, Paleontology, Zoology. RESUMEN Se presenta una recopilación de más de un millar de taxones de nivel género o especie, de los que 486 corresponden a fósiles y 595 a organismos actuales, que fueron nombrados a partir de personajes reales o imaginarios, objetos, compañías comerciales, juegos de palabras, divertimentos sonoros o expresiones con doble significado. Entre las personas distinguidas por estos taxones destacan notablemente los artistas (músicos, actores, escritores, pintores) y, en menor medida, políticos, grandes científicos o divulgadores, así como diversos activistas. De entre los personajes u obras de ficción resaltan los derivados de ciertas obras literarias, películas o series de televisión, además de variadas mitologías propias de las diversas culturas. Los taxones que conllevan una terminología erótica o sexual más o menos explícita, también ocupan un lugar destacado en estas listas. Obviamente, el conjunto de estas excentricidades nomenclaturales, muchas de las cuales bordean el buen gusto y puntualmente rebasan las recomendaciones éticas de los códigos internacionales de nomenclatura, representan una ínfima minoría entre los casi dos millones de especies descritas hasta ahora.
    [Show full text]