WATCHING OUR WATERS a Report on Water Resource Monitoring in the Saco Headwaters Watershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WATCHING OUR WATERS a Report on Water Resource Monitoring in the Saco Headwaters Watershed WATCHING OUR WATERS A Report on Water Resource Monitoring in the Saco Headwaters Watershed Prepared by the Saco Headwaters Alliance and FB Environmental Associates (C) Rundle CONTACT Thomas Gross, President Saco Headwaters Alliance [email protected] www.sacoheadwatersalliance.org This project was made possible with the support of the Virginia Wellington Cabot Foundation. Special thanks to the Upper Saco Valley Land Trust (usvlt.org) and Joe Klementovich Photography (klementovichphoto.com). Cover photo © Jill Rundle WATCHING OUR WATERS A Report on Water Resource Monitoring in the Saco Headwaters Watershed Prepared by the Saco Headwaters Alliance and FB Environmental Associates August 2020 Watching Our Waters represents the first completed project of the Saco Headwaters Alliance (SHA). a non- profit organization based in Conway, NH, and composed of representatives from many segments of our community – municipal leaders, conservationists, land trusts, and professionals – dedicated to protecting and conserving water quality and promoting sustainability and resilience in the Saco headwaters water- shed. All of the waterways of our Saco Headwaters Watershed – streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, and aquifers – are interconnected as one ecosystem. Consequently, pollution, floods, and drought know no municipal or state boundaries. This report is intended to serve as a resource to all stakeholders, both public and private, who share the Saco Headwaters Alliance vision for the future of this region: a resilient watershed, a prosperous economy, a vibrant coalition of communities, and a healthy natural environment for all, with inclusive ac- cess to clean, abundant surface and ground water resources for drinking and recreation. We would like to express our gratitude to Mr. Brendan Fitzgerald and his colleagues at the Virginia Welling- ton Cabot Foundation (VWCF) for supporting our vision and our mission to protect and conserve abun- dant, clean ground and surface waters for a resilient Saco Headwaters Watershed for many years to come. Mr. Fitzgerald’s personal goal was for the VWCF grant to not only underwrite a strategic study of water re- source monitoring across the Saco Headwaters Watershed, but to catalyze the launch of the important work of the Saco Headwaters Alliance. As we publish this report, Mr. Fitzgerald’s goal is already being fulfilled. We have had the good fortune to facilitate funding from various sources including the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Ser- vices (NHDES) for projects created with various partners across the watershed, including municipalities and other stakeholders. We have also developed a pipeline of proposals for outstanding new projects await- ing decisions from funders, plus a robust “wish list” of future priorities. We would also like to thank the Upper Saco Valley Land Trust (USVLT) for serving as our fiscal agent and for providing the encouraging environment in which SHA was conceived by several of us who were USVLT Board members and then became among the first Board members of SHA. This report represents a strategic building block for SHA’s Mission and Urgent Vision. It is grounded in our guiding principles (collaboration, resiliency and ecosystem thinking) and is the result of our expertise in both the natural and social sciences. It describes a work in progress and concludes with a robust action plan. We invite your feedback and your participation as we continue to work to protect the waters and resources of the Saco Headwaters Watershed today and as a legacy for the future. Sincerely, Thomas F. Gross President, Saco Headwaters Alliance WHAT IS A STRATIFIED DRIFT AQUIFER? As glacial ice retreated in New England, layers of sand and gravel were deposited by meltwater streams in valleys and broad plains. Today, these deposits are important aquifers that hold abun- dant groundwater with a relatively short residence time - that is, groundwater is able to travel quickly through the large pore spaces between the sand grains and gravel fragments. These aqui- fers are primarily recharged quickly from the surface by precipitation and infiltration. They often yield large amounts of water to wells and public water supplies, making them crucial to protect. © Klemetovich © Klemetovich © Klemetovich © Rundle © Klemetovich CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 PROGRAMS & DATA............................................................................................. 4 Active Water Resource Monitoring Programs .......................................................................... 5 Monitoring Data Sources ........................................................................................................... 9 Spatial Data Sources .................................................................................................................11 GAP ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................18 ACTION PLAN ....................................................................................................29 Actions that Address Data Gaps .............................................................................................. 29 Actions that Address Natural Science Gaps ............................................................................31 Actions that Address Social Science Gaps .............................................................................. 32 Future Iterations of the Gap Analysis ...................................................................................... 32 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................35 APPENDIX 1 .......................................................................................................36 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Saco Headwaters Watershed is a region of abun- evant to water protection in the Saco Headwaters dant water resources in eastern New Hampshire Watershed. A diverse network of state and federal and western Maine. The watershed is defined by the agencies and nonprofit organizations collects wa- drainage of the Saco River and its major tributary ter data for many purposes and under many separate the Ossipee River at their confluence, an area slight- programs. We also take a close look at the available ly larger than the size of Rhode Island, and includes spatial data for the watershed – geographic informa- mountains, broad glacial valleys, vital stratified drift tion system data that maps locations and boundar- aquifers, and scenic lakes and rivers. Unspoiled natu- ies of natural resources and human infrastructure. ral resources support the recreational tourism econ- omy and provide a high quality of life for residents. The Gap Analysis section critically appraises the available data and the existing monitoring pro- A large portion of the Saco Headwaters Watershed grams for their ability to detect and understand wa- – 43% – is protected as public and private conserva- ter resource threats. Threats and their causes are giv- tion land. The region contains abundant high-quali- en detailed discussion, and key gaps are identified. ty streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and aquifers that face mostly dispersed threats to water resources in the form The Strategic Action Plan section puts forth rec- of nonpoint source pollution. This form of pollution de- ommendations for specific actions to address gaps rives from contaminants produced by activities on the in data and scientific understanding. Details are landscape that can be carried by stormwater to streams provided on each action, including the responsi- or ponds or infiltrated into groundwater. Some notable ble entity, the timeframe, and the estimated cost. examples include nutrients from underground waste- water disposal, soil or sediment particles eroded and This report combines a number of components – each carried by storms, and road salt from winter deicing. of which would be an important undertaking on its own – in pursuit of one goal: to strengthen water resource A robust water quality monitoring system is a key com- monitoring in the Saco Headwaters watershed so that ponent of the Saco Headwaters Alliance’s Urgent Vi- key data gaps can be closed and water protection efforts sion for a more resilient watershed. The core purpose of can be based on the best science possible. A core as- this report is to assess the state of water resource mon- sumption underlying all of this work is that investments itoring with respect to known threats, as well as the in monitoring now will inform effective actions that will ability to respond to newly developing threats, which in turn prevent harm to our water resources that would is essential to building and maintaining resilience. To be much more costly to restore, or worse, irreversible. do this, we comprehensively reviewed the existing monitoring programs and data sources, analyzed gaps, and created recommendations for specific actions. The Programs & Data section inventories monitor- ing programs, organizations, and data sources rel- INTRODUCTION he Saco Headwaters Watershed, defined as all lands and wa- terbodies that drain into the Saco River and its major tributary the Ossipee River, is a region covering 1,294 square miles in Teastern New Hampshire and western Maine. The watershed includes parts of Carroll, Coos, and Grafton counties in New Hampshire and parts of Cumberland, Oxford, and York counties in Maine.
Recommended publications
  • SMPDC Region
    Southern Maine Regional Planning Commission Region Shelburne Batchelders Grant Twp Woodstock Sumner Hartford Mason Twp Beans Purchase Greenwood West Paris Miles Knob !! Miles Notch Number Eight Pond ! Albany Twp Shirley Brook ! Speckled Mountain ! Red Rock Brook Pine Mountain ! ! Lombard Pond ! Isaiah Mountain 3 ! 1 1 Hannah Brook E ! ! Ha T Stoneham ! y R R Sugarloaf Mountain d Willard Brook ! Goodwin Brook T Sugarloaf Mountain S ! B W Virginia Lake in Basin Brook ir Buckfield Brickett Place ! c B ! ! H h ! ro u Cecil Mountain w t A n R ! v R Bickford Brook d Co d d ld ! ! R Bro ok T rl B k Bartlett Brook o d a o R ! n r llen u C G B Beaver Brook ! d r r Mason Hill o Palmer Mountain M d o ! v f o d ! e u R k R r S n r c d i to t n a R e H A ld e R B o in u d k se Rattlesnake Mountain e d r i r Rd ! R Little Pond a f e a t d d m W e ! tl is R B l d t d s i d l n S L R A R l Rattlesnake Brook R n R il M A c ! I t ! a ! o B H in s ! d rs l e n e n r ! e l M S i a t e t d t Adams Mountain id e d u Shell Pond u l B n o l d h e Harding Hill o S o ! a y R R P G m d W d Stiles Mountain d d Great B!rook o Pine Hill R ! n n R ! R d ! y o n ! lle P Pine Hill d R a ee Cold B!rook d Pike's Peak V ll K n e c ! Foster Hill Little Deer HillDeer Hill ee h M Birch Island ! ! ! ! r S ! rg oe Mud Pond Upper Bay ve J Bradley Pond E ! Sheep Islan!d A ! ! nd Amos Mountain C Allen Mountain Paris re ! us ! n w Flat Hill h Rattlesnake Island L s m L ! Deer Hill Spring Harndon Hill Horseshoe Pond r n a Trout Pond ! ! ! e n W d P ! lm o ! Weymouth HillWeymouth
    [Show full text]
  • Features Associated with the Deglaciation of the Upper Saco and Ossipee River Basins, Northern York and Southern Oxford Counties, Maine
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository New England Intercollegiate Geological NEIGC Trips Excursion Collection 1-1-1986 Features associated with the deglaciation of the upper Saco and Ossipee River basins, northern York and southern Oxford Counties, Maine Holland, W.R. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips Recommended Citation Holland, W.R., "Features associated with the deglaciation of the upper Saco and Ossipee River basins, northern York and southern Oxford Counties, Maine" (1986). NEIGC Trips. 392. https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips/392 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the New England Intercollegiate Geological Excursion Collection at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NEIGC Trips by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trip B-l FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEGLACIATION OF THE UPPER SACO AND OSSIPEE RIVER BASINS, NORTHERN YORK AND SOUTHERN OXFORD COUNTIES, MAINE by William R. Holland Robert G. Gerber, Inc. 17 West Street Freeport, Maine 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this field trip is to examine some of the principal fea­ tures associated with the last deglaciation in an area centered on the Saco and Ossipee River valleys in Oxford and York Counties, Maine. (See Figure 1). The area is located in the New England Upland physiographic province (Fenneman, p. 358) southeast of the White Mountains, and constitutes a physiographic boundary between the seaboard lowland and the mountains. It also marks the limit of Late Wisconsin glaciomarine sediments in the Saco basin (See Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geology of the Kezar Falls 7.5' Quadrangle, Maine
    DE PART MENT OF CON SER VA TION Maine Geo logi cal Sur vey Rob ert G. Marv in ney, State Ge olo gist OPEN- FILE NO. 97-67 Ti tle: Sur fic ial Ge ology of the Kezar Falls 7.5-minute Quadran gle, Ox ford and York Coun ties, Maine Author: P. Thompson Davis and Wil liam R. Holland Date: 1997 Fi nan cial Sup port: Funding for the prepara tion of this report was provided in part by the U.S. Geo logi cal Sur vey STATE MAP Pro gram, Co op era tive Agree ment No. 1434- 92- A- 1071. As so ci ated Maps Surfic ial geol ogy of the Kezar Falls quad rangle, Open- File 97-52 Surfic ial materials of the Kezar Falls quad rangle, Open- File 98-230 Con tents: 14 p. re port Maine Geo logi cal Sur vey Open- File 97- 67 Surficial Geology of the Kezar Falls 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Oxford and York Counties, Maine P. Thompson Davis De part ment of Natu ral Sci ences Bent ley Col lege Waltham, Mas sa chu setts 02154- 4705 Wil liam R. Hol land1 INTRODUC TION This re port de scribes the sur fic ial and Qua ter nary ge ol ogy shows spe cific site data used for com pil ing the surfic ial geologi c of the Kezar Falls 7.5- minute quadran gle in southwest ern map. These data in clude ob serva ti ons from sand and gravel pits, Maine. Sur fic ial ma te ri als in clude un con soli dated sedi ments of shovel and auger holes, construc tion sites, and natural expo sures glacia l and non- glacial origin that overli e bedrock over much of along stream banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Atlantic Salmon Habitat Atlas
    MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON HABITAT ATLAS ALEX ABBOTT APRIL 2006 GULF OF MAINE COASTAL PROGRAM U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION Maine Watersheds with Atlantic Salmon Habitat Surveys Aroostook ¯ Penobscot Machias Dennys Kennebec East Machias Pleasant Narraguagus Tunk Union Saco Passagassawakeag Ducktrap St. George Sheepscot Presumpscot 0 10 20 Miles Maine Atlantic Salmon Habitat Atlas April 2006 MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON HABITAT ATLAS April 2006 Introduction This third edition of the Maine Atlantic Salmon Habitat Atlas has been published in digital form to provide detailed maps of surveyed Atlantic salmon habitat in Maine. The habitat data which forms the core of the atlas was developed from field surveys conducted between 1994 and 2005 in the Aroostook, Dennys, Ducktrap, East Machias, Kennebec, Machias, Narraguagus, Passagassawakeag, Penobscot, Pleasant, Presumpscot, St. George, Sheepscot, Tunk and Union River watersheds by staff of the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These surveys were conducted to identify important Atlantic salmon spawning and rearing areas. The habitat data resulting from the surveys is meant to assist with a variety of research, management and planning activities including fry stocking, developing production estimates, habitat protection activities and data collection. While the atlas depicts spawning and rearing habitat and important point features, the digital data used to create these maps also includes information on habitat categories, composition, length, width and depth measurements, as well as canopy and other vegetation variables. Each river surveyed appears alphabetically within the atlas, and has an index map showing the arrangement of individual map pages. Map pages are numbered from upstream to downstream, starting on the mainstem, and then proceeding alphabetically by tributary.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Characterization
    An Approach to Conserving Maine's Natural Old Course Saco River-Saco River LEGEND Space for Plants, Animals, and People Drainage Cat Pond T his m a p depicts a ll wetla nds shown on Na tiona l W etla nd Inventory (NW I) m a ps, but www..begiinniingwiitthhabiittatt..org ca tegorized them ba sed on a subset of wetla nd functions. T his m a p a nd its depiction of wetla nd fea tures neither substitute for nor elim ina te the need to perform on-the- Supplementary Map 7 ground wetla nd delinea tion a nd functiona l a ssessm ent. In no wa y sha ll use of this m a p dim inish or a lter the regula tory protection tha t a ll wetla nds a re a ccorded under Kezar Pond a pplica ble S ta te a nd Federa l la ws. For m ore inform a tion a bout wetla nds cha ra cteriza tion, Drainage Wetlands Cha racterization conta ct Eliza beth H ertz a t the Ma ine Depa rtm ent of Conserva tion (207-287-8061, Wetlands Characterization eliza beth.hertz@m a ine.gov). B G l R K ac U k B R Brownfield A E B Y M This map is non-regulatory and is intended for planning purposes only 302 ro R N T he W etla nds Cha ra cteriza tion m odel is a pla nning tool intended to help identify likely ¤£ ok F E D wetla nd functions a ssocia ted with significa nt wetla nd resources a nd a dja cent upla nds.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine State Legislature
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) * ~·:· MaineDOT Three-Year ork Plan 2020 Edition January 14, 2020 January 14, 2020 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 1,800 dedicated and valued employees at the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2020 Edition of our Work Plan for the three calendar years 2020, 2021, and 2022. This Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,051 individual work items with a total value of $2.59 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work by other transportation agencies including airports and transit agencies. This plan is the primary way that MaineDOT achieves its mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Preparing the MaineDOT Work Plan takes many months. An early step is to adjust projects that had appeared in prior work plans, including changes to cost, schedule, scope, or available funding. In a typical year, we make the “old” projects whole and then add new capital projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars (principally in the third year of the plan). This year is not typical. Due to cost increases arising from workforce challenges, work constraints, and other factors, making the old projects whole has required an extraordinary amount of funding.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 CONSERVATION INVESTMENTS United States and U.S
    NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION 2016 CONSERVATION INVESTMENTS On thecover: Ablackskimmer fishes inFlorida. S ERRITORIE T AND U.S. U.S. AND S UNITED STATE UNITED The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation is dedicated to sustaining, restoring and enhancing the nation’s fish, wildlife, plants and habitats for current and future generations. NFWF will advance its mission through innovative public and private partnerships, and by investing financial resources and intellectual capital into science-based programs designed to address conservation 3 priorities and achieve measurable outcomes. In Fiscal Year 2016, NFWF funded more than 860 conservation projects across the nation, generating an on-the-ground conservation impact of more than $353.8 million. KEY Projects supported by NFWF in fiscal year 2016 Alaska Projects supported by NFWF since founding in 1984 (Not to scale) S ERRITORIE T AND U.S. U.S. AND S UNITED STATE UNITED Hawaii (Not to Scale) NOTE: Projects with multiple locations are represented once and some locations are approximate. NFWF Conservation investments Projects supported by NFWF in fiscal year 2016 The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation funded Projects supported by NFWF since founding in 1984 morE ThaN 860 coNsErvatioN projEcTs across ThE NatioN IN FIscal year 2016. NFWF has supported morE ThaN 16,000 projEcTs sincE its FouNding in 1984. S ERRITORIE T AND U.S. U.S. AND S UNITED STATE UNITED Puerto Rico (Not to scale) 4 coNTENTs united states and u.s. Territories Fiscal Year 2016 conservation Investments alabama 09
    [Show full text]
  • Compliance with Maine's Incidental Take Permit -TE48539B 2015 Annual Report Submitted to US Department of Interior Fish
    Compliance with Maine’s Incidental Take Permit -TE48539B 2015 Annual Report Submitted to US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Prepared by Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife May 1st 2016 Table of Contents Item 1: Summary and Tabulation of 2015 Lynx Incidental Captures ............................................................ 5 Item 2: Any changes to trapping related regulations that are required by the ITP or that may otherwise affect the ITP or this permit. ........................................................................................... 6 Item 3. Data on lynx capture reporting rates & evaluation of compliance with reporting requirements. .................................................................................................................................. 8 Item 4. Data on compliance with visible bait regulations, compliance based on investigations of lynx incidental capture events. ........................................................................................................ 9 Item 5. Summary of updated incidental capture database and evaluation of compliance with ITP objectives. ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Item 6a. Copy of updated standard operating procedures. ....................................................................... 10 Item 6b. Copy of injury scoring system. .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the U.S Atlantic Salmon
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE U.S. ATLANTIC SALMON ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE REPORT NO. 32 - 2019 ACTIVITIES Portland, Maine March 2 – 6, 2020 PREPARED FOR U.S. SECTION TO NASCO Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Description of Fisheries and By-catch in USA Waters ................................................................... 4 1.3 Adult Returns to USA Rivers .......................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Stock Enhancement Programs ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Tagging and Marking Programs .................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Farm Production ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.7 Smolt Emigration ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.8 References .................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Viability Assessment - Gulf of Maine Atlantic Salmon .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maine-Fishing-Guide.Pdf
    MAINE FISHING GUIDE ALL IN FOR THE MAINE OUTDOORS An age-old escape from day-to-day stress (and a modern escape from screens), a good day of fishing offers equal parts relaxation, anticipation, and reward. Out on the water, surrounded by mountains and pines, you can make priceless outdoor memories, teach kids lifelong lessons — and if you’re lucky, rehash it all over a fresh-caught dinner. Fishing in Maine CHOOSE YOUR ADVENTURE Maine has over 32,000 miles of rivers and streams and 6,000 Unmatched beauty lakes and ponds. This wealth of waterways includes the known fishing hot spots in this guide, as well as plenty of pristine, remote waters just waiting to become your favorite get-away- Abundant natural resources from-it-all spot. Options abound: you can venture deep into the Allagash Wilderness Waterway or Baxter State Park, or stay close to the coast, where many river reaches offer natural, Lifelong memories undeveloped shorelines and unsurpassed fishing action, all within the bounds of cities and towns. SOMETHING FOR EVERY LEVEL OF ANGLER Every year, serious anglers from New England and beyond flock to their favorite Maine waters, putting their skills to the test against our famous leaping landlocks, fierce-fighting smallmouth bass (found in remote and populated regions alike), and trophy largemouth bass in the coastal region. Maine is the only state in the lower 48 to have native populations of Arctic charr and is the last true stronghold for wild brook trout. But you don’t have to be an expert angler to enjoy a day of fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Copy of Cover Page and Memo Page
    MAPA-3 revised 2-2016 Notice of Agency Rule-making Proposal ADVERTISE: May 8, 2019 AGENCY: 09-137 Inland Fisheries and Wildlife CHAPTER NUMBER AND TITLE: Chapter 17 – Trapping (17.03, 17.06, 17.07) PROPOSED RULE NUMBER: BRIEF SUMMARY: The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife is proposing changes to trapping rules to include the following: amend the definition of a covered float, extend the beaver trapping season in southern Maine by 15 days, add specified property in Fort Fairfield to the beaver closures in WMD 6, and adjust the muskrat trapping season to coincide with beaver trapping. In an effort to standardize requirements across species the Department is also proposing that all bobcat harvested by hunting and otter taken in beaver traps from January 1 to April 30 be registered by Department staff within 10 days of harvest. A lower canine may be submitted when presenting a bobcat for registration. An amendment to possession of pelts without fur registration tag requirements will allow someone the ability to gift unregistered coyote pelts to someone else for registration and utilization of the pelt. A complete copy of the proposed rule can be obtained from the rulemaking contact person listed below. Date, time and location of PUBLIC HEARING: May 29, 2019 @ 5:30pm - Augusta Armory, Room 209B, 179 Western Avenue, Augusta COMMENT DEADLINE: June 10, 2019 CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS FILING: Becky Orff, Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 284 State Street 41 SHS, Augusta, ME 04333; phone: 207-287-5202; fax: 207-287-6395; e-mail: [email protected] FINANCIAL IMPACT ON MUNICIPALITIES OR COUNTIES: No fiscal impact anticipated.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 18: Status of Each River/Stream Assessment Unit In
    Assessment Unit ID NHRIV600020101-01 Size 8.5730 MILES Final 2012 Attainment Status of All Reviewed Assessment Unit Name Elephant Head Brook Beach N Parameters, All Saco Basin Primary Town HARTS LOCATION Assessment Unit Category* 3-ND Rivers USE Expected Use DES USE Parameter Parameter Parameter TMDL To Attain Source Desc Category Threat Name Threatened Category Schedule Date Name Aquatic Life 3-ND Benthic-Macroinvertebrate N 3-ND Bioassessments (Streams) Dissolved oxygen saturation N 3-ND Fishes Bioassessments N 3-ND (Streams) Oxygen, Dissolved N 3-ND pH N 3-ND Drinking Water After 2-G Adequate Treatment Fish Consumption 4A-M Mercury N 4A-M Atmospheric Deposition - Toxics Primary Contact 3-ND Escherichia coli N 3-ND Recreation Secondary Contact 3-ND Escherichia coli N 3-ND Recreation Wildlife 3-ND *DES Categories; 2-G = Supports Parameter well above criteria, 2-M = Supports Parameter marginally above criteria, 2-OBS = Exceeds WQ criteria but natural therefore not a WQ exceedence, 3-ND = Insufficient Information/No data, 3-PAS= Insufficient Page 1 of 396 Information/Potentially Attaining Standard, 3-PNS= Insufficient Information/Potentially Not Attaining Standard, (4A=Impaired/TMDL Date: 4/7/2015 Completed, 4B=Impaired/Other Measure with rectify Impairment, 4C=Impaired/Non-Pollutant, 5=Impaired/TMDL needed) M-Marginally Impairment, P=Severe Impairment, T=Threatened Assessment Unit ID NHRIV600020101-02 Size 3.9640 MILES Final 2012 Attainment Status of All Reviewed Assessment Unit Name Avalanche Brook Beach N Parameters, All Saco Basin
    [Show full text]