DOCSLIB.ORG

IRG-Rail (15) 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IRG-Rail (15) 1 IRG-Rail (15) 1 Independent Regulators’ Group – Rail IRG-Rail Annual Report 2014 February 2015 IRG-Rail (15) 1 Foreword of the Chair ................................................................................................. 3 A. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 I. Goals of IRG-Rail ............................................................................................. 5 II. Work Programme and Working Groups ........................................................ 5 B. Overview of the Activities according to the Work Programme 2014 .................... 9 1. Activities of the Access Working Group ..................................................... 9 2. Activities of the Charges Working Group ................................................. 12 3. Activities of the Legislative Developments Working Group ...................... 14 4. Activities of the Market Monitoring Group ................................................ 15 C. Organisational Issues ........................................................................................ 17 I. Representation and Communication .............................................................. 17 II. Information about Elections and Plenary Meetings ..................................... 18 1. Elections .................................................................................................. 18 2. Plenary Meetings ..................................................................................... 18 Annex I – Published Documents .............................................................................. 20 Annex II – Members of IRG-Rail .............................................................................. 21 2 IRG-Rail (15) 1 Foreword of the Chair The annual report for 2014 covers the activities performed by the Independent Regulators’ Group-Rail (IRG-Rail). Since the creation of the group in 2011, a lot has been achieved. Rail freight and passenger transport have an important role to play in the European economy and need to be integrated into a global transport concept in Europe. The European economy must develop a multimodal transport strategy. The continuous legislative developments proposed by the European Commission will promote the creation of a true single market for rail services. On the legislative side, the year 2014 was marked by fewer new proposals from the European Commission since it was the year when the European citizens elected a new Parliament. A new team under the presidency of Mr. Jean-Claude Juncker took over the executive task of running European policy. We are looking forward to working together with the new Transport Commissioner Mrs. Violeta Bulc. IRG-Rail’s main aim is to actively contribute to the creation of a single, competitive, efficient and sustainable internal rail market in Europe. As a unique platform for exchange of information, experience and best practice between national European railway regulators, IRG-Rail focuses on cooperation with a view to existing and upcoming regulatory challenges in European railways, and endorses a consistent application of the European regulatory framework. The organisational structure of IRG-Rail is based on four different working groups. Each group focuses on the main regulatory topics concerning access, charges, market monitoring and legislative developments. Two sub-groups have been established to work on the charging and access regimes for service facilities. 3 IRG-Rail (15) 1 Over the years, the organisation has evolved and I have adopted the same approach as my predecessors (Mr. Matthias Kurth, Mrs. Iris Henseler-Unger and Mrs. Anna Walker). As Chair, I was pleased to welcome the Italian Transport Regulation Authority ART as a new member of our group in March 2014. IRG-Rail has become a voice highly respected by the European Commission, the European Parliament and rail stakeholders in Europe. It is an organisation which tackles key issues without wasting its scarce resources. It remains highly efficient, and is capable of rapidly producing position papers that are targeted, relevant and current. The representatives of the various regulators in the working groups have all done work distinguished by its high quality, and this is why I would like to thank them all for their effort and invaluable contributions. Our organisation is about a common effort, realised by people with different backgrounds and cultures, who manage to get along, work together and agree on a common goal in favour of an efficient railway market. I would also like to thank my successor, Mr. Henk Don of the Dutch Regulatory Body ACM, and his team, for their support as vice-president, as well as everyone who provided their expertise to the group since its creation. I express my best wishes to my successor for his presidency and I hope that at the end of the year, he will be as satisfied as I am today when considering what has been achieved so far since 2011. Jacques Prost - Chair, Institut Luxembourgeois de Régulation 4 IRG-Rail (15) 1 A. Introduction I. Goals of IRG-Rail 1. IRG-Rail is the Independent Rail Regulators’ Group, an association representing the independent rail regulatory bodies of 25 European countries. It was created on June 9, 2011 by 15 European countries1, with the aim of enhancing and promoting cooperation between national independent rail regulatory bodies. Since its foundation, the independent rail regulatory bodies from Finland, Greece, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Poland, Bulgaria, Belgium, Kosovo and Italy also have become members. 2. The group’s objectives are to: enable effective and sustainable competition in the provision of passenger and freight rail transport; proactively contribute to the development and application of the European regulatory framework for railways; express the common position of Europe’s rail regulatory bodies regarding the most important emerging issues in the European rail market. 3. On the basis of an open and transparent dialogue with all relevant parties, notably with the European Commission, the European Parliament and the main rail stakeholders, IRG-Rail, composed of regulatory professionals from all around Europe, strives to contribute its views, experience and efforts to the sustainable development of a single competitive European rail market. II. Work Programme and Working Groups 4. As in previous years, in 2014 IRG-Rail continued to focus on the two key areas (highlighted in the Work Programme 20142), namely the harmonisation and improvement 1 Austria, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, France, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. 2 The Work Programme 2014 has been approved by the IRG-Rail Plenary as of October 2013. 5 IRG-Rail (15) 1 of the cooperation between regulatory bodies, as well as dealing with new challenges resulting from changes in the institutional environment. 5. During the on-going liberalisation process of the European railway market, IRG-Rail has sought to contribute to the shaping of tomorrow’s railway market. In order to promote fair, sustainable and transparent competition on the market, IRG-Rail proactively shares its regulatory knowledge and experience with the main stakeholders of the European rail market, thus seeking to influence the upcoming challenges and initiatives at European level. 6. In order to foster a common regulatory voice, IRG-Rail strives to deepen the cooperation among regulatory bodies and improve the harmonisation of regulatory practice in its member countries. The group also seeks to anticipate and address challenges emerging from the evolution of the institutional environment in Europe. 7. The working groups listed below aim to tackle their respective topics by publishing IRG- Rail’s view in documents such as position papers or discussion papers, reports or guidelines. Working Group Scope Covering access issues in particular with regard Access Working Group to freight corridors and access to service facilities Dealing with charging matters in relation with Charges Working Group railway infrastructure and rail-related services Dealing with issues stemming from new Legislative Developments Working legislative instruments or initiatives proposed by Group the European Commission Market Monitoring Working Group Working on general market monitoring topics Responsible for general coordination, Advisory Steering Committee3 monitoring and strategic orientation 3 The Advisory Steering Committee consists of representatives of regulatory bodies of the current, previous and next chair of IRG-Rail. Members of other regulatory bodies are also invited to participate. 6 IRG-Rail (15) 1 8. In 2014, the Access Working Group focused on the development of European freight corridors, in relation to Directive n° 913/2010. It published a position paper on the monitoring task of the regulatory bodies with regards to the activities of the Corridor One- Stop-Shop. Furthermore, it issued a position paper on framework agreements, containing comments on a discussion paper from the European Commission. During the year, a Sub-Working Group Access, working on issues relating to service facilities, was established. It produced an initial position paper covering transparency and non- discriminatory access to service facilities. A further paper, currently under preparation, is dealing with the forthcoming implementing act on service facilities. 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • P R E S S BACKGROUND1 FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNCIL Monday 23
    Brussels, 20 June 2014 BACKGROUND 1 FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNCIL Monday 23 June 2014 in Luxembourg The Council, chaired by the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton, will start at 10.00. The newly-appointed Foreign Minister of Ukraine , Pavlo Klimkin, will be invited to discuss with the ministers the developments in his country. The Council will then have an internal debate to take stock of developments in Ukraine, on which it is expected to adopt conclusions. The Council will exchange views on events in Libya and also discuss the latest developments in Iraq and Syria . Over lunch, ministers will debate the latest developments in Iraq as well as related aspects of the Syrian crisis , in the presence of Nikolay Mladenov, Special Representative of the UN Secretary General for Iraq and Head of the UN Assistance Mission in Iraq. The EU-Turkey Association Council will take place at 8.00. The EU delegation will be led, on behalf of the High Representative, by the Greek Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Evangelos Venizelos (TV/photo opportunity at 8.45). Press conferences: • following the EU-Turkey Association Council (+/- 10.00) • after the Foreign Affairs Council (+/- 16.00) * * * Press conferences and public events by video streaming: http://video.consilium.europa.eu/ Video coverage in broadcast quality (MPEG4): http://tvnewsroom.consilium.europa.eu Photographic library on www.consilium.europa.eu/photo for photos in high resolution. * * * 1 This note has been drawn up under the responsibility of the press office P R E S S Council of the European Union - Press Office Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0) 2 281 6319 [email protected] http://www.consilium.europa.eu/press Ukraine Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin is invited to address EU foreign ministers at the start of the session.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg's Development Cooperation Annual Report 2015
    Luxembourg’s development cooperation Annual report 2015 Lëtzebuerger Entwécklungszesummenaarbecht www.cooperation.lu There is also an independent microsite containing the annual reports on Luxembourg’s development cooperation since 2010 at the following address: www.cooperation.lu. Table of contents Annual report 2015 4 Introduction by the Minister 7 Meetings and trips in 2015 11 European Year for Development 14 COP21 and the Paris Agreement 16 I. Luxembourg’s official development assistance in 2015 26 II. Cooperation with the main partner countries 26 The new Indicative Cooperation Programmes and the focus on least developed countries 29 Africa 29 Burkina Faso 30 Cabo Verde 31 Mali 32 Niger 33 Senegal 34 Central America 34 El Salvador 35 Nicaragua 36 Asia 36 Laos 37 Vietnam 38 III. Regional cooperation and cooperation with other countries 40 Balkans (Kosovo – Montenegro – Serbia) 40 Mongolia 41 Myanmar 42 Occupied Palestinian Territories 43 Afghanistan/Tajikistan 44 IV. Multilateral cooperation 53 V. European Union 55 VI. Cooperation with development NGOs 59 VII. Humanitarian action 67 VIII. Programme support 69 IX. Development education and awareness raising 70 X. Inclusive finance 71 XI. Evaluation 73 XII. Report on the progress of the work of the Interministerial Committee 77 Appendices 77 A. Useful addresses 79 B. Organisational chart of the Directorate for Development Cooperation 81 C. Useful links 3 Introduction by the Minister Dear friends of Luxembourg’s development cooperation, It is my pleasure to present to you this annual report 2015 on Luxembourg de- velopment cooperation. In last year’s annual report I highlighted the fact that 2015 would be a pivotal year for development cooperation and that the major international meetings would to a large extent reconfigure our post-2015 devel- opment cooperation and its financing.
    [Show full text]
  • SGAC-Annual-Report-2014.Pdf
    ANNUAL REPORT SPACE GENERATION ADVISORY COUNCIL 2014 In support of the United Nations Programme on Space Applications A. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Table of Contents 2 In support of the United Nations Programme B. Sponsors and Partners 4 on Space Applications 1. Introduction 10 1.1 About the SGAC 12 14 c/o European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) 1.2 Letter from the Co-chairs 15 Schwarzenbergplatz 6 1.3 Letter from the Executive Director 16 Vienna A-1030 1.4 SGAC output at a glance AUSTRIA 2. SGAC Background 22 2.1 History of the SGAC 24 26 [email protected] 2.2 Leadership and Structure 27 www.spacegeneration.org 2.3 Programme +41 1 718 11 18 30 3. The organisation in 2014 30 32 +43 1 718 11 18 99 3.1 Goal Achievement Review 3.2 SGAC Activity Highlights 36 42 © 2015 Space Generation Advisory Council 3.3 Space Generation Fusion Forum Report 3.4 Space Generation Congress Report 50 3.5 United Nations Report 62 3.6 SGAC Regional Workshops 66 3.7 SGAC Supported Events 68 3.8 Financial Summary 72 Acknowledgements 4. Projects 78 4.1 Project Outcomes and Highlights 80 The SGAC 2014 Annual Report was compiled and 4.2 Space Technologies for Disaster Management Project Group 81 edited by Minoo Rathansabapathy (South Africa/ 4.3 Near Earth Objects Project Group 82 Australia), Andrea Jaime (Spain), Laura Rose (USA) 4.4 Space Law and Policy Project Group 84 and Arno Geens (Belgium) with the assistance of 4.5 Commercial Space Project Group 86 Candice Goodwin (South Africa), Justin Park (USA), 4.6 Space Safety and Sustainability Project Group 88 Nikita Marwaha (United Kingdom), Dario Schor 4.7 Small Satellites Project Group 90 (Argentina/Canada), Leo Teeney (UK) and Abhijeet 4.8 Space Exploration Project Group 92 Kumar (Australia) in editing.
    [Show full text]
  • People in the EU: Who Are We and How Do We Live?
    Statistical books People in the EU: who are we and how do we live? 2015 edition Statistical books People in the EU: who are we and how do we live? 2015 edition Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 ISBN 978-92-79-50328-3 doi: 10.2785/406462 N° Cat: KS-04-15-567-EN-N Theme: Population and social conditions Collection: Statistical books © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of contents other than photo is authorised, provided that the source is acknowledged. Copyright for the photos: foreword © European Union; other photos © Fotolia, 2015 For reproduction or use of these photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder. Printed in Luxembourg PRINTED ON ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER (ECF) Contents Contents Contents 3 Foreword 4 Abstract 6 Introduction 7 1. Demographic changes — profile of the population 21 2. Changing family life — portrait of household and family structures 43 3. Home comforts — housing conditions and housing characteristics 65 4. Native diversity — residents’ origin 87 5. Changing places — geographic mobility 113 6. An ageing society — focus on the elderly 133 7. Demographic challenges — population projections 157 Abbreviations 174 People in the EU: who are we and how do we live? 3 Foreword Foreword of Commissioner Thyssen Europe's ambition is to make sure that more than 500 million people can fully participate in society.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 583 30 June 2014 No. 15 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 30 June 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 577 30 JUNE 2014 578 Mr Speaker: I call the hon. Member for Romford House of Commons (Andrew Rosindell)—[Interruption.] After the initiative of the right hon. Gentleman in bringing about the grouping and then in so graciously recollecting the fact Monday 30 June 2014 that he had done so, the hon. Member for Romford is sadly not with us. The House met at half-past Two o’clock Mr Pickles: Perhaps I was prescient. Mr Speaker: Yes, the right hon. Gentleman might PRAYERS have been prescient. I am sure the hon. Member for Romford was told by the Department. If he was not, we are sorry. If he was, he should be here and we are sorry [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] that he is not. No doubt further and better information will become available in due course. Development (Brownfield Land) Oral Answers to Questions 2. Mr Marcus Jones (Nuneaton) (Con): What steps he is taking to encourage development on brownfield land. [904504] COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT 4. Chloe Smith (Norwich North) (Con): What steps he is taking to encourage development on brownfield land. [904507] The Secretary of State was asked— 10. Stephen Mosley (City of Chester) (Con): What Waste and Inefficiency steps he is taking to encourage development on brownfield land.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Concepts in the Frontex and Exit
    Frontex and Exit Governance Dataveillance, civil society and markets for border control Lemberg-Pedersen, Martin; Joel Halpern, Oliver Publication date: 2021 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Lemberg-Pedersen, M., & Joel Halpern, O. (2021). Frontex and Exit Governance: Dataveillance, civil society and markets for border control. Advancing Alternative Migration Governance (AdMiGov) http://admigov.eu/upload/Deliverable_23_Frontex_and_Exit_Governance_Lemberg-Pedersen_Halpern.pdf Download date: 06. okt.. 2021 Key Concepts Advancingin the Alternative Migration Governance Frontex and Exit Governance: Dataveillence, Civil Society and Markets for Border Control Deliverable 2.3 Martin Lemberg-Pedersen & Oliver Joel Halpern 2021 This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 822625. The content reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains Publication information You are free to share and adapt the material if you include a proper reference. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Suggested citation: Lemberg-Pedersen, M. and Halpern, O. J. (2021) Frontex and Exit Governance: Dataveillance, civil society and markets for border control. AdMiGov Deliverable 2.3., Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. Available at http://admigov.eu Acknowledgments This paper has been written by Martin Lemberg-Pedersen and Oliver Joel Halpern, and peer- reviewed by Julien Jeandesboz. The views presented are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the institutions with which they are affiliated. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] Table of content List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER February 2014
    NEWSLETTER February 2014 the final step before the official Highlights in this issue Editorial launch of the strategy in late 2014. 1 February: Australians push 12 February was a Our member associations are as for dementia on G20 agenda busy month in active as ever: Portugal has Luxembourg and 11 February: ADI releases 17 opened yet another day care it appears that report on nutrition centre and new campaigns are this pace will 18 February: AE holds lunch 2 running in Denmark and France. continue during Romania held a successful annual debate in the European the whole year. Parliament conference and a dementia We are working seminar took place in the 20 February: Malta begins 12 on the 2014 Conference and also Norwegian Parliament. The Dutch consultation on national our annual publications. We have association is funding new dementia strategy also attended various meetings – research projects and Northern 20 February: Piramal’s 15 and have received an astonishing Ireland will soon see its first florbetaben approved by number of proposals to participate dementia-friendly communities. European Commission in new IMI and Horizon 2020 In the science world, IMI has 26 February: European 8 projects. rd named new experts to head its Parliament approves 3 EU Our first event of the year was a Health Plan Scientific Committee and lunch debate hosted by MEP AstraZeneca and Merck both Françoise Grossetête. The debate announced Phase 3 trials of their focused on the current and future respective BACE inhibitors. activities of IMI, presented by Executive Director Michel February also saw the launch of Goldman.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Publishing
    PhD-FLSHASE-2014-19 The Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education DISSERTATION Defense held on 17/10/2014 in Luxembourg to obtain the degree of DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DU LUXEMBOURG EN SCIENCES DE L'ÉDUCATION by Philippe BLANCA Born on 22 February1970 in Châtillon sur Chalaronne (France) THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL IN THE AGE OF DIGITAL MULTIMODALITY Dissertation defense committee Dr Ch. Max, Dissertation supervisor Professor, Université du Luxembourg Dr Ch. Schommer, Chairman Professor, Université du Luxembourg Dr P. Hitzler, Vice-chairman Professor, Write State University, Dayton, USA Dr G. Kress, Committee member Professor, University of London Dr P. Caire, Committee member Professor, Université du Luxembourg The Scientific Journal in the Age of Digital Multimodality Page 1 Preface It is common to compare the process of completing a PhD dissertation with a journey. This is no different in the present case. From a personal point of view, this dissertation is an attempt to put together ideas and experiences coming from various contexts I was involved in over the past 15 years. In particular, my involvement as a member of the editorial board of the French multidisciplinary journal Le Croquant founded by Prof. Michel Cornaton in 1987 is pivotal. The present work is also the result of reflections related to readings in various domains (from poetry and literature to social sciences and philosophy) and discussions in connection with the organisation of scientific conferences fully integrating artistic events, such as music concerts, painting exhibitions and plays. Finally, these pages are the result of a long process of transformation of an initial question that has arisen from lively discussions and debates with friends – each of us, according to her or his preferences, celebrating or defending the unique values of words, sounds, drawings, images or photographs etc.
    [Show full text]
  • European Real Snapshot Autumn 2014
    EUROPEAN REAL SnapShot! Advisory Real Estate / Autumn 2014 Current developments in the key real estate markets in Europe Special focus: The Hotel Investment Market Content Germany 6 Historically low prime yields – will the rally in the German Hotel Market continue? United Kingdom 9 No let up in demand for UK real estate Nordic Region 16 Upswing is underway The Netherlands 20 Residential market boosts foreign investment Belgium 23 Stability in the market Luxembourg 26 Stable growth in a safe economy France 30 Big deals underpinned the market Switzerland 34 Real estate investment market loses momentum Austria 37 Robust market conditions Italy 40 Economy still fragile, but outlook optimistic Spain 44 At a stage of recovery CEE 46 Further recovery in the region may be jeopardised by the ongoing geopolitical crisis Russia 52 Under pressure, or an opportunity to buy in? Turkey 57 missing Good growth prospects Trends in the European Real Estate Investment Markets Global capital in the search for European real estate the same percentage throughout 2013. Retail secured an investments additional 2% share of investment volumes, increasing to Thank you for your interest in KPMG’s Real SnapShot. This 25% in H1 2014. In contrast, residential experienced some publication gives you an overview and insight into the softening, declining slightly from 16% of 2013’s market developments under way in the real estate markets across volume to 12% in H1 2014. Turning to our special focus Europe. sector for this issue, hospitality transaction volumes secured 8% of total investments made in the first half of the year. Momentum continues to build across these markets, with investment property transaction volumes delivering a 10% Y-o-Y growth for H1 2014 showed strong increases in retail year-on-year (“Y-o-Y”) growth to reach €89bn in the first half and office investment volumes (51% and 14% respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 754 Monday No. 16 30 June 2014 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Questions Health: Multiple Sclerosis................................................................................................................................................1527 Busking ...............................................................................................................................................................................1529 Education: Citizenship Studies ........................................................................................................................................1531 Disabled Students’ Allowance..........................................................................................................................................1535 Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2014 Motion to Approve ...........................................................................................................................................................1537 Legislative Reform (Clinical Commissioning Groups) Order 2014 Motion to Approve ...........................................................................................................................................................1537 Criminal Justice and Courts Bill Second Reading..................................................................................................................................................................1537
    [Show full text]
  • Indicator D1. How Does Time Spent by Students in the Classroom Vary Over the Years?
    350 D1. HOW DOES TIME SPENT BY STUDENTS IN THE CLASSROOM VARY OVER THE YEARS? Indicator D1. How does time spent by students in the classroom vary over the years? Highlights In most OECD and partner countries, the number of hours of instruction in compulsory primary and lower secondary education does not change much from year to year. However, between 2014 and 2019 the instruction time regulations have changed at least once in a majority of the countries with available data. The total number of compulsory instruction hours in primary and general lower secondary education changed in three-quarters of the countries with available data between 2014 and 2019. The changes exceeded 5% in Australia, Denmark, Hungary, Lithuania, Portugal and Spain. Changes in instruction time regulations could influence one or more aspects of students’ compulsory instruction time: the number of grades in different levels of compulsory education, the length of school year and the distribution of compulsory instruction time by subject and/or by grade. Context Providing instruction in formal classroom settings accounts for a large portion of public investment in education. Countries make various choices concerning the overall amount of time devoted to instruction and which subjects are compulsory. These choices reflect national and/or regional priorities and preferences concerning what material students should be taught and at what age. These priorities and preferences may change over time to adapt to the changes in the society or education policy. Changes may also be implemented further to specific crisis, such as the pandemic due to COVID-19 (Box D1.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Presidency of the European Union (1 July – 31 December 2014)
    Greek Presidency of the European Union (1 January – 31 June 2014) & Italian Presidency of the European Union (1 July – 31 December 2014) Last updated in July 2014 Latest Developments During the last three months of its Presidency, Greece promoted a series of regulatory actions on sports and environmental policy. At the Education, Youth, Culture and Sports Council, which took place on 20-21 May, European Sports ministers adopted a resolution on the EU Work Plan for Sport (2014-2017), which complements and reinforces the impact of activities launched under the Erasmus+ programme in this field and aims to further strengthen the cooperation in the field of sport between member states and the Commission. The Ministers also adopted conclusions on gender equality in sport, inviting member states to consider developing policies and programmes for eliminating gender stereotypes and promoting gender equality in education curricula and practices from an early age. Finally, ministers discussed the economic, social and environmental sustainability of major sport events, such as the Olympic Games and World/European Championships. Ministers addressed in particular the issue of legacy. Press conference & Press release Conclusions on gender equality in sport On 12 June, European Environment Ministers met for the last time under the Greek Presidency. Inter alia, Ministers adopted conclusions on the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), in the context of the preparation of the three CBD-related international meetings to be held in Pyeongchang (Republic of Korea) in September and October 2014. Council Conclusions; Press Release On 1 July 2014, Italy assumed the Presidency of the Council of the EU.
    [Show full text]