6005889584.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides
Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES NUMBER 6 Editorial Board Chair: Donald Mastronarde Editorial Board: Alessandro Barchiesi, Todd Hickey, Emily Mackil, Richard Martin, Robert Morstein-Marx, J. Theodore Peña, Kim Shelton California Classical Studies publishes peer-reviewed long-form scholarship with online open access and print-on-demand availability. The primary aim of the series is to disseminate basic research (editing and analysis of primary materials both textual and physical), data-heavy re- search, and highly specialized research of the kind that is either hard to place with the leading publishers in Classics or extremely expensive for libraries and individuals when produced by a leading academic publisher. In addition to promoting archaeological publications, papyrologi- cal and epigraphic studies, technical textual studies, and the like, the series will also produce selected titles of a more general profile. The startup phase of this project (2013–2017) is supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Also in the series: Number 1: Leslie Kurke, The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, 2013 Number 2: Edward Courtney, A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, 2013 Number 3: Mark Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, 2015 Number 4: Mirjam Kotwick, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Metaphys- ics, 2016 Number 5: Joey Williams, The Archaeology of Roman Surveillance in the Central Alentejo, Portugal, 2017 PRELIMINARY STUDIES ON THE SCHOLIA TO EURIPIDES Donald J. Mastronarde CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES Berkeley, California © 2017 by Donald J. Mastronarde. California Classical Studies c/o Department of Classics University of California Berkeley, California 94720–2520 USA http://calclassicalstudies.org email: [email protected] ISBN 9781939926104 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017916025 CONTENTS Preface vii Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Sigla for Manuscripts of Euripides xvii List of Plates xxix 1. -
SCHOLIA, COMMENTARIES, and LEXICA on SPECIFIC LITERARY WORKS 2 Scholia, Commentaries, and Lexica on Specific Literary Works
18 SCHOLIA, COMMENTARIES, AND LEXICA ON SPECIFIC LITERARY WORKS 2 Scholia, Commentaries, and Lexica on Specific Literary Works 2.1 ARCHAIC AND CLASSICAL POETRY This category includes the most famous and most often cited scholia. By far the most important are the Homer scholia, but those on Pindar and the Attic drama- tists are also significant. 2.1.1 Homer Ancient scholarship on Homer was extensive and of high quality, for the best scholars of antiquity devoted much of their time and energy to the Homeric poems. Work on Homer that could be described as scholarship goes back at least to the classical period and probably to the sixth century bc, and editing the text of Homer was one of the main tasks of the first Alexandrian scholars. Zenodotus, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus probably all produced editions of the Iliad and Odyssey, and Aristarchus wrote extensive commentaries, while Zenodotus and Aristophanes compiled glossaries of primarily Homeric words. In addition, the early and persistent use of Homer as a school text meant that there was a tradi- tion of school exegesis that reached back as far as the classical period. Though none of the very early work on Homer survives in its original form, a surprising amount is preserved in various later compilations, so we often know, for example, the read- ings of several different Alexandrian scholars for a particular passage, and even some of the arguments behind these readings (although the arguments preserved in later sources cannot always be assumed to be those of the editor himself). Two principal sources for the ancient scholarship on Homer survive: the scholia and Eustathius’ commentaries, both of which are gigantic works filling many vol- umes in modern editions. -
Mihail Mitrea a LATE BYZANTINE SWAN SONG
Mihail Mitrea A LATE BYZANTINE SWAN SONG: MAXIMOS NEAMONITES AND HIS LETTERS MA Thesis in Comparative History with the specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies CEU eTD Collection Central European University Budapest May 2011 A LATE BYZANTINE SWAN SONG: MAXIMOS NEAMONITES AND HIS LETTERS by Mihail Mitrea (Romania) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Comparative History, with the specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU ____________________________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________________________ Examiner Budapest May 2011 A LATE BYZANTINE SWAN SONG: MAXIMOS NEAMONITES AND HIS LETTERS by Mihail Mitrea (Romania) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Comparative History, with the specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU ____________________________________________________________ External Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2011 A LATE BYZANTINE SWAN SONG: MAXIMOS NEAMONITES AND HIS LETTERS by -
Demetrius Triclinius and Responsion Between Non-Consecutive Strophes
Demetrius Triclinius and Responsion between Non-consecutive Strophes in Greek Drama Almut Fries Introduction Demetrius Triclinius, who was active in Thessalonica in the first third of the fourteenth century,1 is well known as the most accomplished Byzantine metrician and the first scholar since the end of antiquity to understand the principle of strophic re- sponsion in Pindar and the lyrics of Greek drama. Armed with this knowledge, he emended and annotated the texts of the tragedians, Aristophanes, and Pindar in a series of editions, some of which became the vulgate for several centuries. The principal source of Triclinius’ metrical expertise was Hephaestion’s Encheiridion (II A.D.), equipped with scholia as well as the commentaries of Longinus and Choeroboscus. His personal copy of these and other works on metre survives as the codex Marc.gr. 483.2 In addition, Triclinius used the old metri- cal scholia on Pindar and Aristophanes, of which the latter largely go back to another distinguished ancient metrician, Heliodorus, who certainly preceded Hephaestion (who quotes him) and has variously been dated to the first century B.C. or, more often, the first century A.D.3 1 Very little is known about his life, not even the years of his birth and/or death, although from the dates of his scholarly output (see below), ca. 1280 to 1335 is a reasonable guess. For a concise account of Triclinius’ career see N. G. Wilson, Scholars of Byzantium2 (London 1996) 249–256. 2 Described in E. Mioni, Bibliothecae Divi Marci Venetiarum. Codices Graeci Manuscripti II Thesaurus Antiquus. -
Philology. Linguistics P
P PHILOLOGY. LINGUISTICS P Philology. Linguistics Periodicals. Serials Cf. P215+ Phonology and phonetics Cf. P501+ Indo-European philology 1.A1 International or polyglot 1.A3-Z American and English 2 French 3 German 7 Scandinavian 9 Other (10) Yearbooks see P1+ Societies Cf. P215+ Phonology and phonetics Cf. P503 Indo-European philology 11 American and English 12 French 13 German 15 Italian 17 Scandinavian 18 Spanish and Portuguese 19 Other Congresses Cf. P505 Indo-European philology 21 Permanent. By name 23 Other Museums. Exhibitions 24 General works 24.2.A-Z Individual. By place, A-Z Collected works (nonserial) Cf. P511+ Indo-European philology 25 Monographic series. Sets of monographic works 26.A-Z Studies in honor of a particular person or institution. Festschriften. By honoree, A-Z 27 Collected works, papers, etc., of individual authors 29 Encyclopedias. Dictionaries 29.5 Terminology. Notation Cf. P152 Grammatical nomenclature Theory. Method General works see P121+ 33 General special Relation to anthropology, ethnology and culture Including Sapir-Whorf hypothesis Cf. GN1+ Anthropology 35 General works 35.5.A-Z By region or country, A-Z Relation to psychology. Psycholinguistics Cf. BF455+ Psycholinguistics (Psychology) 37 General works Study and teaching. Research 37.3 General works 37.4.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 37.45.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 37.5.A-Z Special aspects, A-Z 37.5.C37 Cartesian linguistics 37.5.C39 Categorization Cf. P128.C37 Categorization (Linguistic analysis) 1 P PHILOLOGY. LINGUISTICS P Theory. Method Relation to psychology. Psycholinguistics Special aspects, A-Z -- Continued 37.5.C64 Communicative competence Cf. -
Preface to the Scholia Edition at Euripidesscholia.Org1
Preface to the Scholia Edition at EuripidesScholia.org1 Donald J. Mastronarde Abstract This contribution is an interim version of the preface materials that will appear with the online release (expected in 2020) of an edition of a large mass of scholia on Euripides’ Orestes 1–500. It includes condensed versions of the sections on previous editions and the manuscripts used and more complete sections on the categorization of the scholia (by date of first attestation, and by type of content), the principles applied in treating scholia as separate or “the same”, the XML structure (or information architecture) of what is reported, and other conventions of the edition. Zusammenfassung Dieser Beitrag ist ein Zwischenstandsbericht zur Einleitung für die wohl 2020 erscheinende Edition der Scholien zu Euripides’ Orestes 1–500. Er beinhaltet kürzere Beiträge zu früheren Editionen und zu den verwendeten Hand- schriften sowie längere Beiträge über die Kategorisierung und wesentliche Leitlinien bei der Einteilung der Scholien, über die XML-Struktur und über andere Grundsätze der Edition. Keywords Euripides, organisation and representation of texts, digital editions, print editions, manuscripts, linkage of data This edition of the scholia on the plays of Euripides is conceived as an open-ended re- pository of the ancient and medieval annotations in Greek2 found in the papyri and medieval manuscripts. It aims for a comprehensiveness that is impossible in orthodox printed editions of scholia, and is meant to serve purposes beyond giving classicists access to the material that is believed to be most reflective of ancient commentaries in the Hellenistic and early Roman imperial period. This more complete inventory of annotation aims, in addition, to serve the study of scholarship up the 16th century, the study of late antique and Byzantine education, and the analysis of the relations 1 Disclaimer: this Preface is a work-in-progress. -
Zick 1 Brian Zick SRS 200-08 Professor Mueller November 22
Zick 1 Brian Zick SRS 200-08 Professor Mueller November 22 2016 Servandae Antiquae Litterae: How Latin and Greek Scholarship during the Decline of the Byzantine Empire Saved Classical Literature Classical scholarship has been an academic pursuit since the initial production of what is now considered classical literature in ancient Rome and Greece. The contemporaries of authors, playwrights, historians, in fact of all writers of the ancient world, criticized and shared the work of their peers. During the Roman republic, Pliny the Younger1, among others, even revised and formalized letters specifically for the purpose of publication. Every aspect of the written word was leveraged to showcase one's literary ability and to present one's thoughts to the public. This tradition of literary criticism has persisted until the modern era both in the study of classics and in that of other languages. The study of classics is currently maintaining a relatively steady place in the world of higher education, in particular at liberal arts institutions. While the classics are not as popular to the average person as they were in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the average public interest is increasing with many secondary schools reintroducing Latin and Greek to the classroom. The study of classics would not be possible without hundreds perhaps thousands of scholars who painstakingly hand copied the ancient texts until the invention of the printing press, and after that time as well. If those individuals had not passed these works down through the generations, not only would the formal study of classics perhaps never have existed, at least not to the extent that it does today, but the entire foundation of Western society would disappear. -
Sophocles; the Text of the Seven Plays;
LlbRARY OF UN.VERSITY CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO presented to the UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO by Mrs. Charles Kelly SOPHOCLES CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, C. F. CLAY, MANAGER. ILontron: FETTER LANE, E.G. 50, WELLINGTON STREET. Uip>tfl: F. A. BROCKHAUS. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. JSombag atrtJ Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD. [All Rights reserved.} SOPHOCLES THE TEXT OF THE SEVEN PLAYS EDITED BY SIR RICHARD I JEBB, Lirr.D. CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1906 First Edition, 1897. Reprinted 1906. CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION vii OEDIPUS TYRANNUS i OEDIPUS COLONEUS 53 ANTIGONE . -117 . AJAX t .165 ELECTKA 215 TRACHINIAE 267 PHILOCTETES 313 INTRODUCTION. I. The Laurentian Manuscript of Sophocles. i. The oldest and also the best source for the text of ' Sophocles is the famous codex Laurentianus (L), numbered xxxn. 9 in the Biblioteca Mediceo-Laurenziana at Florence. This MS., written on vellum, is a volume measuring \2\ by 8 inches, of 264 leaves (=528 pages). It contains: (i) The seven plays of Sophocles, which occupy leaves i 118, or 2 pp. i 236. (2) The seven plays of Aeschylus on leaves 119 189. (3) The Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, leaves 190 264. The MS. was probably written in the first half of the 1 At one time it was more generally called, as by Dindorf, the codex ' Mediceus (M). The name of the Library, Mediceo-Laurenziana,' denotes that it (i) was founded by the Medici, and (2) is adjacent to the Church of San Lorenzo, which itself was restored by members of that house. So the Marciana at Venice is named from St Mark, the Ambrosiana at Milan ' ' is the distinctive of the from St Ambrose. -
P PHILOLOGY. LINGUISTICS P Philology. Linguistics Periodicals
P PHILOLOGY. LINGUISTICS P Philology. Linguistics Periodicals. Serials Cf. P215+ Phonology and phonetics Cf. P501+ Indo-European philology 1.A1 International or polyglot 1.A3-Z American and English 2 French 3 German 7 Scandinavian 9 Other (10) Yearbooks see P1+ Societies Cf. P215+ Phonology and phonetics Cf. P503 Indo-European philology 11 American and English 12 French 13 German 15 Italian 17 Scandinavian 18 Spanish and Portuguese 19 Other Congresses Cf. P505 Indo-European philology 21 Permanent. By name 23 Other Museums. Exhibitions 24 General works 24.2.A-Z Individual. By place, A-Z Collected works (nonserial) Cf. P511+ Indo-European philology 25 Monographic series. Sets of monographic works 26.A-Z Studies in honor of a particular person or institution. Festschriften. By honoree, A-Z 27 Collected works, papers, etc., of individual authors 29 Encyclopedias. Dictionaries 29.5 Terminology. Notation Cf. P152 Grammatical nomenclature Theory. Method General works see P121+ 33 General special Relation to anthropology, ethnology and culture Including Sapir-Whorf hypothesis Cf. GN1+ Anthropology 35 General works 35.5.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 1 P PHILOLOGY. LINGUISTICS P Theory. Method -- Continued Relation to psychology. Psycholinguistics Cf. BF455+ Psycholinguistics (Psychology) 37 General works Study and teaching. Research 37.3 General works 37.4.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 37.45.A-Z By region or country, A-Z 37.5.A-Z Special aspects, A-Z 37.5.C37 Cartesian linguistics 37.5.C39 Categorization Cf. P128.C37 Categorization (Linguistic analysis) 37.5.C64 Communicative competence Cf. P53.255 Language study and teaching 37.5.C65 Competence and performance 37.5.C66 Comprehension Cf.