DOCSLIB.ORG

Sophocles; the Text of the Seven Plays;

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sophocles; the Text of the Seven Plays; LlbRARY OF UN.VERSITY CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO presented to the UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO by Mrs. Charles Kelly SOPHOCLES CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, C. F. CLAY, MANAGER. ILontron: FETTER LANE, E.G. 50, WELLINGTON STREET. Uip>tfl: F. A. BROCKHAUS. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. JSombag atrtJ Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD. [All Rights reserved.} SOPHOCLES THE TEXT OF THE SEVEN PLAYS EDITED BY SIR RICHARD I JEBB, Lirr.D. CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1906 First Edition, 1897. Reprinted 1906. CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION vii OEDIPUS TYRANNUS i OEDIPUS COLONEUS 53 ANTIGONE . -117 . AJAX t .165 ELECTKA 215 TRACHINIAE 267 PHILOCTETES 313 INTRODUCTION. I. The Laurentian Manuscript of Sophocles. i. The oldest and also the best source for the text of ' Sophocles is the famous codex Laurentianus (L), numbered xxxn. 9 in the Biblioteca Mediceo-Laurenziana at Florence. This MS., written on vellum, is a volume measuring \2\ by 8 inches, of 264 leaves (=528 pages). It contains: (i) The seven plays of Sophocles, which occupy leaves i 118, or 2 pp. i 236. (2) The seven plays of Aeschylus on leaves 119 189. (3) The Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, leaves 190 264. The MS. was probably written in the first half of the 1 At one time it was more generally called, as by Dindorf, the codex ' Mediceus (M). The name of the Library, Mediceo-Laurenziana,' denotes that it (i) was founded by the Medici, and (2) is adjacent to the Church of San Lorenzo, which itself was restored by members of that house. So the Marciana at Venice is named from St Mark, the Ambrosiana at Milan ' ' is the distinctive of the from St Ambrose. Laurenziana more part name ; for Cosimo de' Medici the Elder founded also the Library of San Marco at ' Florence (see below, p. xxxiii). Hence the Mediceo-Laurenziana' is often ' called simply 'Laurenziana,' but not simply Medicea'; and for the same reason the codex should be called 'Laurentianus' rather than 'Mediceus.' a Of the Agamemnon it has only vv. i 310 and 1067 1159, having lost the quire which contained vv. 31 1 1066, and also six leaves of another quire, which contained vv. 1160 1673, and Clio, i 9. viii Introduction, eleventh century. This approximate date is inferred from the general character of the writing : there is no other evidence. Minuscule writing, as seen in medieval MSS., passes through phases of development which shade into each other, but in 1 which three periods can be broadly distinguished . (1) In the earliest of these, from the ninth century to about the middle of the tenth, the minuscule hand is regular, formal, calligraphic, being an effort to adapt the ordinary cursive writing of the day to literary (especially liturgical) uses in a shape which should be comparable for beauty with the uncial character of an earlier time. (2) The second period extends from about the middle of the tenth to the middle of the thirteenth century. A more fluent style now appears alongside of the other. This new hand is more set and formal than the common cursive, but less calligraphic than the standard models of literary penman- It in books but ship. was employed, indeed, transcribing ; chiefly when the book was intended to be a working copy for every-day use by students, rather than the ornament of a library, or a volume for the service of the Church. The Laurentian MS. is an example of this style. It approximates in general character to a MS. of St Ephraem which bears the 2 date 1049 A.D. And one peculiarity which it exhibits con- firms the inference from the type of the hand. Medieval MSS. to in were usually ruled with lines guide the scribe ; and the minuscule MSS. of the ninth century the custom was to write above the line. But in the tenth century a fashion of writing under the line came in, and in the course of the eleventh century this system superseded the other. In the Laurentian MS. is line the writing sometimes above, sometimes below, the ; a circumstance which points to a time of transition, when a 1 On this subject generally, see Sir E. M. Thompson, Handbook of Greek and Latin Palaeography, chap. xn. a Omont, Fac-simile des plus anciens MSS. grecs de la BM, Nat. (1892), pi. 21. The Lanrentian Manuscript. ix scribe felt free to follow whichever method he found the more 1 convenient in a particular place . (3) The third period of minuscule, from the middle of the thirteenth to the middle of the fifteenth century, is one of gradual change from the more exact and beautiful forms of writing to others of a more hurried and irregular kind, with a in the sixteenth growing use of contractions ; until, century, loose and straggling hands, of an almost modern type, begin to appear. It will be seen, then, that the date assigned to the Laurentian MS. rests on grounds which, if purely palaeo- graphical, are definite. 2. The MS. was produced in a regular workshop or scrip- torium at Byzantium, whence it came to Florence. The Sophocles is contained in 14 quires of 4 sheets (or 8 leaves) each, followed by one quire of 6 leaves, that number sufficing to complete the text. With regard to ruling, the first quire differs from the rest. On the outer sheet (fol. i and fol. 8) each page has 39 close-set lines : the other three 2 lines. other sheets (ff. 7) have 40 In the quires, each page is ruled with 38 lines for the text. Two lines at the top of each page, and three lines at the bottom, are ruled at intervals twice as wide as the spaces between the text-lines. These five extra lines were intended to receive scholia ; for which ample room is also marked off in the margins by two pairs of vertical lines, one pair on each side of the text-space. A peculiar feature of the MS. is the laxity with which the scribe treats the ruling. He almost always exceeds the number of 38 verses on a page, often writing as many as 48. He evidently knew how far he might encroach, in any given for scholia a fact place, on the room available ; which makes it probable that there were scholia in the MS. which he copied. 1 Sir E. M. Thompson, Introduction to the autotype Facsimile of the Laurentian MS., published in 1885 by the Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies, p. 7. x Introduction. 3. The Sophocles and the Apollonius are by the same hand, which wrote also the first quire of Aeschylus (to Persae This 705), i.e., leaves i 126 and 190 264 of the MS. ' writer is known as the first scribe '. The rest of Aeschylus (leaves 127 189) is by 'the second scribe', with whom we are not here concerned. The first scribe writes an easy and flexible hand, with only occasional stiffness (as at the beginning of the Aj'ax). The letters have a slight leaning to the right (the cursive tendency); and the general style of the writing is that which marks the second period of minuscule, as described 1 above. He uses very few contractions . But the professional scribe acted under the supervision of a more scholarly person, who controlled the work. The scribe wrote the text of Sophocles, with the title and colophon ' the of each play, the Dramatis Personae ', and Arguments. His supervisor then compared the MS. with the archetype, in corrected it, and wrote the scholia the spaces prepared for them. Hence he is usually designated by the letter S as the 'diorthotes' the first (scholiast), or (i.e., and chief corrector). S wrote the scholia in a character which combines the ' uncial with the minuscule, and is known as semi-uncial'. In MSS. of that period the semi-uncial was often used for ' Dramatis Personae while the of scholia, titles, ', etc., body the text was written in minuscule. But S made occasional use of minuscule also, viz., in supplying verses which the scribe had omitted, and (as a rule) in noting variants. Hence the hand of S can be compared with the hand of the scribe in two different in the semi-uncial used phases ; habitually by 1 The examples which occur are mostly in words to which contraction was commonly applied in biblical or liturgical MSS., such as varfip, fJ-^rrip, TroX/1 for ir6\iv in T. vios, 0e6s, avdpwiros, ovpav6s, Trvev/jLa. O. 104 (f. 34^), and eXavdav*- (t\dv6a.i>fv) in El. 914 (f. 16 b) are exceptional. So, too, are ib. ir&pvov (irapOtvov) in Tr. 148 (f. 66), and irapvov 1219 (f. 78^). In the scholia (written by S) contractions are far more frequent. The two principal hands in L. xi S, and occasionally (as in titles, 'Dramatis Personae', etc.) the scribe or in the minuscule used the by ; habitually by scribe, and occasionally by S. The general difference is well marked. The hand of the scribe is freer and more flexible : that of S is delicate and clear, but stiffer and more and his when descend below the formal ; letters, they line, are longer than those of the scribe. 4. Errors in the text are sometimes corrected by the hand of the scribe 1 sometimes that of S*. The task of , by supplying verses which had been accidentally omitted is also shared 8 between them . The various readings in the margin are nearly all due to S. These variants appear to be set down, not as corrections of readings in the text, but rather as alternatives which the writer thought worthy of record : the prefixed yp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unpublished Emendations from the Library of Peter Elmsley
    Finglass, P. J. (2007). Unpublished emendations by Peter Elmsley on Euripides and Aristophanes. Classical Quarterly, 57(2), 742-746. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000663 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/S0009838807000663 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Cambridge University Press at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000663. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ UNPUBLISHED EMENDATIONS BY PETER ELMSLEY ON EURIPIDES AND ARISTOPHANES Several books once owned by the English classicist Peter Elmsley (1774-1825) are now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. Some contain extensive annotations in Elmsley’s hand. These are written in different inks (sometimes in pencil), which indicates (as we might have expected) that they were not all composed in a single sitting. No dates are given, however. Almost all the notes are emendations. Much of the material contained in these marginalia was published by Elmsley during his lifetime, in his own printed editions or in reviews of the editions of others. But some of it has never previously appeared. Of the unpublished emendations, several can be immediately discarded because they have subsequently been found in manuscripts, or were anticipated by scholars writing before Elmsley.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEK and LATIN CLASSICS V Blackwell’S Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ
    Blackwell’s Rare Books Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Blackwell’S rare books Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/rarebooks GREEK AND LATIN CLASSICS V Blackwell’s Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/ rarebooks Our premises are in the main Blackwell bookstore at 48-51 Broad Street, one of the largest and best known in the world, housing over 200,000 new book titles, covering every subject, discipline and interest, as well as a large secondhand books department. There is lift access to each floor. The bookstore is in the centre of the city, opposite the Bodleian Library and Sheldonian Theatre, and close to several of the colleges and other university buildings, with on street parking close by. Oxford is at the centre of an excellent road and rail network, close to the London - Birmingham (M40) motorway and is served by a frequent train service from London (Paddington). Hours: Monday–Saturday 9am to 6pm. (Tuesday 9:30am to 6pm.) Purchases: We are always keen to purchase books, whether single works or in quantity, and will be pleased to make arrangements to view them. Auction commissions: We attend a number of auction sales and will be happy to execute commissions on your behalf. Blackwell online bookshop www.blackwell.co.uk Our extensive online catalogue of new books caters for every speciality, with the latest releases and editor’s recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginalia and Commentaries in the Papyri of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes
    Nikolaos Athanassiou Marginalia and Commentaries in the Papyri of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes PhD thesis / Dept. of Greek and Latin University College London London 1999 C Name of candidate: Nikolaos Athanassiou Title of Thesis: Marginalia and commentaries in the papyri of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes. The purpose of the thesis is to examine a selection of papyri from the large corpus of Euripides, Sophocles and Aristophanes. The study of the texts has been divided into three major chapters where each one of the selected papyri is first reproduced and then discussed. The transcription follows the original publication whereas any possible textual improvement is included in the commentary. The commentary also contains a general description of the papyrus (date, layout and content) as well reference to special characteristics. The structure of the commentary is not identical for marginalia and hy-pomnemata: the former are examined in relation to their position round the main text and are treated both as individual notes and as a group conveying the annotator's aims. The latter are examined lemma by lemma with more emphasis upon their origins and later appearances in scholia and lexica. After the study of the papyri follows an essay which summarizes the results and tries to incorporate them into the wider context of the history of the text of each author and the scholarly attention that this received by the Alexandrian scholars or later grammarians. The main effort is to place each papyrus into one of the various stages that scholarly exegesis passed especially in late antiquity. Special treatment has been given to P.Wurzburg 1, the importance of which made it necessary that it occupies a chapter by itself.
    [Show full text]
  • P.Oxy. 2438 and the Order of Books in Aristophanes Byzantius’ Edition of Pindar
    The Classical Quarterly 70.2 822–826 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 822 doi:10.1017/S0009838820000804 P.OXY. 2438 AND THE ORDER OF BOOKS IN ARISTOPHANES BYZANTIUS’ EDITION OF PINDAR Two well-known ancient witnesses report that Aristophanes of Byzantium was responsible for the arrangement of Pindar’s poems into seventeen book-rolls according to lyric genres (dithyrambs, hymns, etc.). These witnesses form fr. 381 in the edition of Aristophanes’ fragments by W.J. Slater (Aristophanis Byzantii fragmenta [Berlin and New York, 1986]): Vit. Pind. P.Oxy. 2438.35–9(LDAB 3724, TM 62542; late second/early third century A.D.)1 δ]ιῄρηται̣̣δὲ αὐ̣τ̣[̣ο]ῦ̣τ[̣ὰ ποιήματα ὑπ’ Ἀριστοφάν]ους εἰς βιβλία ιζˊ· διθ[̣υ]ρά[̣μ]βων βˊ [προσοδίω]ν ̣βˊ παιάνων αˊ πα[ρ]θεν[εί]ων γˊ̣[ἐπινικίω]ν ̣δˊ ἐγκωμίων αˊ ἐν [ᾧ] καὶ̣ [σκ]όλ[̣ια ±4 ὕμ]νων̣ αˊ ὑ[π]ορχημάτων αˊ θρ[̣ήνων. | nisi aliter ind., omnia suppl. Lobel | 2 Ἀριστοφάν]ους Lobel e Vit. Pind. Vat. (q.v.) | 3 ἐν [ᾧ] καὶ̣[σκ]όλ[̣ια …. de Kreij : ἐν [ᾧ] κ[αὶ σκόλιά τινα vel ἐν [ᾧ] κ[αὶ σκόλιά ἐστι(ν) Gallo (1968, 73–4; 1969, 107) : ἐν [ᾧ] καὶ [παροίνια D’Alessio (2000) | 4 αˊ post θρ[̣ήνων coni.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Receptions of Ovid's Tristia Dissertation
    RENAISSANCE RECEPTIONS OF OVID’S TRISTIA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gabriel Fuchs, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Frank T. Coulson, Advisor Benjamin Acosta-Hughes Tom Hawkins Copyright by Gabriel Fuchs 2013 ABSTRACT This study examines two facets of the reception of Ovid’s Tristia in the 16th century: its commentary tradition and its adaptation by Latin poets. It lays the groundwork for a more comprehensive study of the Renaissance reception of the Tristia by providing a scholarly platform where there was none before (particularly with regard to the unedited, unpublished commentary tradition), and offers literary case studies of poetic postscripts to Ovid’s Tristia in order to explore the wider impact of Ovid’s exilic imaginary in 16th-century Europe. After a brief introduction, the second chapter introduces the three major commentaries on the Tristia printed in the Renaissance: those of Bartolomaeus Merula (published 1499, Venice), Veit Amerbach (1549, Basel), and Hecules Ciofanus (1581, Antwerp) and analyzes their various contexts, styles, and approaches to the text. The third chapter shows the commentators at work, presenting a more focused look at how these commentators apply their differing methods to the same selection of the Tristia, namely Book 2. These two chapters combine to demonstrate how commentary on the Tristia developed over the course of the 16th century: it begins from an encyclopedic approach, becomes focused on rhetoric, and is later aimed at textual criticism, presenting a trajectory that ii becomes increasingly focused and philological.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Studies in England, 1810-1825 Horsfall, Nicholas Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1974; 15, 4; Proquest Pg
    Classical Studies in England, 1810-1825 Horsfall, Nicholas Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1974; 15, 4; ProQuest pg. 449 Classical Studies in England, 1810-1825 Nicholas Horsfall N DECEMBER 1944, Lieut.-Col. Basil Elmsley Coke placed in the I hands of Westminster Schooll the surviving academic and personal papers of the Revd Peter Elmsley, his kinsman2 and an Old Westminster. Elmsley (1774-1825) was already in his mid-thirties "the best Greek scholar yet produced by Oxford," and in some respects was to be compared with Porson himself.3 Rich, obese, gossipy and genial, he corresponded widely: John Franklin the ex­ plorer and Francis Jeffrey of the Edinburgh Review were alike on cordial terms with him, though Jeffrey's free-thinking later became intolerable.4 Accidents of transmission and survivalS have dictated that the letters of classical interest in the Westminster collection should be largely from the hands of J. H. Monk, C. J. Blomfield and Thomas Gaisford. There are slightly under a hundred letters from these three correspondents; I select, excerpt and omit without hesitation: the letters contain much that is trivial and tedious. We learn little about Gaisford (1779-1855) from his letters, contain­ ing as they do little gossip and less odium philologicum. They are con­ cerned largely with the scholarly problems of the moment, problems which the thoroughness of German editors and the scope of modern libraries have rendered capable of immediate solution. One comment, 1 To whose successive headmasters, John Carleton and John Rae, I am most grateful for access to these papers and for permission to publish from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides
    Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES NUMBER 6 Editorial Board Chair: Donald Mastronarde Editorial Board: Alessandro Barchiesi, Todd Hickey, Emily Mackil, Richard Martin, Robert Morstein-Marx, J. Theodore Peña, Kim Shelton California Classical Studies publishes peer-reviewed long-form scholarship with online open access and print-on-demand availability. The primary aim of the series is to disseminate basic research (editing and analysis of primary materials both textual and physical), data-heavy re- search, and highly specialized research of the kind that is either hard to place with the leading publishers in Classics or extremely expensive for libraries and individuals when produced by a leading academic publisher. In addition to promoting archaeological publications, papyrologi- cal and epigraphic studies, technical textual studies, and the like, the series will also produce selected titles of a more general profile. The startup phase of this project (2013–2017) is supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Also in the series: Number 1: Leslie Kurke, The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, 2013 Number 2: Edward Courtney, A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, 2013 Number 3: Mark Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, 2015 Number 4: Mirjam Kotwick, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Metaphys- ics, 2016 Number 5: Joey Williams, The Archaeology of Roman Surveillance in the Central Alentejo, Portugal, 2017 PRELIMINARY STUDIES ON THE SCHOLIA TO EURIPIDES Donald J. Mastronarde CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES Berkeley, California © 2017 by Donald J. Mastronarde. California Classical Studies c/o Department of Classics University of California Berkeley, California 94720–2520 USA http://calclassicalstudies.org email: [email protected] ISBN 9781939926104 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017916025 CONTENTS Preface vii Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Sigla for Manuscripts of Euripides xvii List of Plates xxix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Scribes and Scholars (3Rd Ed. 1991)
    SCRIBES AND SCHOLARS A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature BY L. D. REYNOLDS Fellow and Tutor of Brasenose College, Oxford AND N. G. WILSON Fellow and Tutor of Lincoln College, Oxford THIRD EDITION CLARENDON PRESS • OXFORD Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford 0x2 6DP Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bombay Calcutta Cape Town Dares Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madras Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi Paris Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a trade mark of Oxford University Press Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford University Press 1968, 1974, 1991 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Scribes and scholars: a guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature/by L.
    [Show full text]
  • P.Oxy. 2438 and the Order of Books in Aristophanes Byzantius' Edition Of
    The Classical Quarterly 70.2 822–826 © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 822 doi:10.1017/S0009838820000804 P.OXY. 2438 AND THE ORDER OF BOOKS IN ARISTOPHANES BYZANTIUS’ EDITION OF PINDAR Two well-known ancient witnesses report that Aristophanes of Byzantium was responsible for the arrangement of Pindar’s poems into seventeen book-rolls according to lyric genres (dithyrambs, hymns, etc.). These witnesses form fr. 381 in the edition of Aristophanes’ fragments by W.J. Slater (Aristophanis Byzantii fragmenta [Berlin and New York, 1986]): Vit. Pind. P.Oxy. 2438.35–9(LDAB 3724, TM 62542; late second/early third century A.D.)1 δ]ιῄρηται̣̣δὲ αὐ̣τ̣[̣ο]ῦ̣τ[̣ὰ ποιήματα ὑπ’ Ἀριστοφάν]ους εἰς βιβλία ιζˊ· διθ[̣υ]ρά[̣μ]βων βˊ [προσοδίω]ν ̣βˊ παιάνων αˊ πα[ρ]θεν[εί]ων γˊ̣[ἐπινικίω]ν ̣δˊ ἐγκωμίων αˊ ἐν [ᾧ] καὶ̣ [σκ]όλ[̣ια ±4 ὕμ]νων̣ αˊ ὑ[π]ορχημάτων αˊ θρ[̣ήνων. | nisi aliter ind., omnia suppl. Lobel | 2 Ἀριστοφάν]ους Lobel e Vit. Pind. Vat. (q.v.) | 3 ἐν [ᾧ] καὶ̣[σκ]όλ[̣ια …. de Kreij : ἐν [ᾧ] κ[αὶ σκόλιά τινα vel ἐν [ᾧ] κ[αὶ σκόλιά ἐστι(ν) Gallo (1968, 73–4; 1969, 107) : ἐν [ᾧ] καὶ [παροίνια D’Alessio (2000) | 4 αˊ post θρ[̣ήνων coni.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    SMATHERS LIBRARIES’ LATIN AND GREEK RARE BOOKS COLLECTION UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS page LECTORI: TO THE READER ........................................................................................ 20 LATIN AUTHORS.......................................................................................................... 24 Ammianus ............................................................................................................... 24 Title: Rerum gestarum quae extant, libri XIV-XXXI. What exists of the Histories, books 14-31. ................................................................................. 24 Apuleius .................................................................................................................. 24 Title: Opera. Works. ......................................................................................... 24 Title: L. Apuleii Madaurensis Opera omnia quae exstant. All works of L. Apuleius of Madaurus which are extant. ....................................................... 25 See also PA6207 .A2 1825a ............................................................................ 26 Augustine ................................................................................................................ 26 Title: De Civitate Dei Libri XXII. 22 Books about the City of God. ..................... 26 Title: Commentarii in Omnes Divi Pauli Epistolas. Commentary on All the Letters of Saint Paul. ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • G. Mancuso, Congetture Inedite Di Peter Elmsley All'andromaca Di
    LEXIS Poetica, retorica e comunicazione nella tradizione classica 31.2013 ADOLF M. HAKKERT EDITORE LEXIS Poetica, retorica e comunicazione nella tradizione classica SOMMARIO ARTICOLI Riccardo Di Donato, Saluto a Belfagor ………………………………………………………….. 1 Carlo Franco, Il contributo di Emilio Gabba …………………………………………………….. 6 Enrico Medda, Ricordo di Vincenzo Di Benedetto ………………………………………………. 11 Nicholas Horsfall, Un ricordo di Giovanni Franco , con appendice di Carlo Franco …………… 14 Claude Calame, De la pratique culturelle dominante à la philologie classique: le rôle du chœur dans la tragédie attique ……………………………………………………………...................... 16 Lucia Marrucci, Zeus ‘Nemetor’ nei ‘Sette contro Tebe’ (Aesch. ‘Sept.’ 485) ………………….. 29 Francesco Mambrini, Les Dons de Clytemnestre et la tombe d’Agamemnon. Sur Soph. ‘El.’ 431-63 ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 40 Enrico Medda, Statue per Menelao? Un’interpretazione di Aesch. ‘Ag.’ 416-9 ………………… 60 Daria Francobandiera, «Comment faut-il le nommer?» Note sur l’histoire des interprétations d’Aesch. ‘Ch.’ 997-1000 …………………………………………………………………………. 76 Pietro Totaro, Venticinque anni di studi greci su “Lexis”. Nota a Eschilo ‘Supplici’ 859 s. e 894 . 105 Matteo Taufer, Due parziali apografi eschilei nel Laur. 32.21 (Ca) per ‘Sept.’ 35-68 e ‘PV’ 789-1093 …………………………………………………………………………………………. 113 Matteo Taufer, Aesch. ‘PV’ 550 ἀλαὸν ‘φέρεται’ γένος : una lezione inedita nel Vallicell. B 70 (Nb) . 119 Reina Marisol Troca Pereira, Ifigénia em Áulide – duas afirmações: blasfémia (vs. deuses) ou realismo (vs.
    [Show full text]
  • BOOKS from the LIBRARY of the EARLS of MACCLESFIELD
    BOOKS from the LIBRARY of THE EARLS OF MACCLESFIELD CATALOGUE 1440 MAGGS BROS. LTD. Books from the Library of The Earls of Macclesfield Item 14, Artemidorus [4to]. Item 111, Hexham [folio]. CATALOGUE 1440 MAGGS BROS. LTD. 2010 Item 195, Schreyer [8vo]. Item 211, del Torre [4to]. Front cover illustration: The arms of the first Earl of Macclesfield taken from an armorial head-piece to the dedication of Xenophon Cyropaedia ed. T. Hutchinson, Oxford, 1727. BOOKS FROM THE LIBRARY OF THE EARLS OF MACCLESFIELD AT SHIRBURN CASTLE This selection of 240 items from the Macclesfield of languages. The works are almost all new to the Library formerly at Shirburn Castle near Watlington, market, Maggs having been privileged to have MAGGS BROS LTD Oxfordshire, mirrors the multiform interests of the received the remainder of the library not previously 50 Berkeley Square library, encompassing classical texts, works on the consigned for sale. The books, which are mostly non- military arts, a (very) few works of a scientific nature, English, range from one very uncommon incunable London W1J 5BA works of more modern literature and history, some to a few printed in the eighteenth century, but most collections of emblems, and some items on the study are of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Telephone 020 7493 7160 Fax 020 7499 2007 5 Email [email protected] 1 ABARBANEL, Isaac. Don Yitzhaq with loss of page numbers, modern half calf. [email protected] Abravani’el... & R. Mosis Alschechi Venice: M.A. Barboni, 1690 £2000 comment. in Esaiae prophetiam 30 [actually This work, clearly meant for those members of the Isaiah 52 v.
    [Show full text]