DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 3A Land Use

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 3A Land Use Section 3A Land Use 3A.1 Summary The following is a summary of the proposed project’s potential impacts to land use, any necessary mitigation measures, and the level of significance after mitigation. Significance Potential Impact Mitigation Measure(s) after mitigation SANTIAGO HILLS II PLANNED COMMUNITY Potential Impact 3A-1. No mitigation was included in 2000 SEIR 1278. Less than Division of Established No new mitigation is required. significant Community Potential Impact 3A-2. MM-LU-1 from 2000 SEIR 1278 has been implemented by the Less than Conflict with Applicable Land proposed project and would no longer be applicable. (For significant Use Plans MM-LU-2 from 2000 SEIR 1278, see Section 3I, Visual Resources.) 2000 SEIR 1278 mitigation measure that has been partially implemented by the proposed project but the remainder continues to be applicable: MM LU-3. Limit grading (implemented), prepare tree survey (implemented), and provide tree replacement and monitoring to reduce impacts to Irvine Regional Park. No new mitigation is required. Potential Impact 3A-3. No mitigation was included in 2000 SEIR 1278. Less than Conflict with Applicable HCP or No new mitigation is required. significant NCCP EAST ORANGE PLANNED COMMUNITY – AREA 1 Potential Impact 3A-1. No mitigation is required. Less than Division of Established significant Community Potential Impact 3A-2. No mitigation is required. Less than Conflict with Applicable Land significant Use Plans Potential Impact 3A-3. No mitigation is required. Less than Conflict with Applicable HCP or significant NCCP EAST ORANGE PLANNED COMMUNITY – AREAS 2 AND 3 AND REMAINING AREAS Potential Impact 3A-1. No mitigation is required. Less than Division of Established significant Community Santiago Hills II and East Orange October 2004 Planned Communities Draft SEIR/EIR 3A-1 J&S 03005.03 City of Orange 3A. Land Use Significance Potential Impact Mitigation Measure(s) after mitigation Potential Impact 3A-2. No mitigation is required. Less than Conflict with Applicable Land significant Use Plans Potential Impact 3A-3. No mitigation is required. Less than Conflict with Applicable HCP or significant NCCP 3A.2 Introduction This section analyzes the potential impacts of the proposed project on land use and on the project’s consistency with applicable land use plans. Land use plans include the County General Plan, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Comprehensive Plan, the adopted City General Plan and East Orange General Plan, and the City Integrated General Plan. Public and agency comments received during the review of the notice of preparation and scoping meetings were considered during the analysis of potential impacts to land use. SCAG reminded the City that the EIR must discuss inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable general and regional plans. The County LAFCO requested that this Draft SEIR/EIR address any future amendments to the City’s Sphere of Influence that might result from the proposed development and annexation. (The City does not propose to change the boundaries of its Sphere of Influence at this time, so no further discussion of changes to the Sphere of Influence is included in this document.) Comments on land use received from the public included requests for other land uses within the project area and questions about the project’s compatibility with local and regional land use plans, policies and regulations. See Appendix A-4 for a list of comments received during scoping. 3A.3 Setting 3A.3.1 Regional Setting The proposed project is in unincorporated Orange County within the eastern portion of the City Sphere of Influence. It adjoins both sides of SR-241 and Santiago Canyon Road, as described in Chapter 2, Project Description, of this Draft SEIR/EIR. The proposed project site and the lands to its north, south, and east are largely undeveloped and include dedicated parks and open-space lands. The corporate boundaries of the City encompass a land area of 24 square miles, with a Sphere of Influence of 55 square miles. The Sphere of Influence describes the unincorporated County area adjoining the City that comprises its “probable physical boundaries and service area,” as determined by the County LAFCO (Government Code Section 56076). Land must be within the City’s Sphere of Influence before it may be annexed to the City. Until such time as they are annexed, lands within the Sphere of Influence are subject to County (not City) land use policies and regulations. Santiago Hills II and East Orange October 2004 Planned Communities Draft SEIR/EIR 3A-2 J&S 03005.03 City of Orange 3A. Land Use 3A.3.2 Existing Site Characteristics The proposed project area consists of a series of steep hills and valleys on the southern flank of the Santa Ana Mountains, with the eastern part of the site being somewhat steeper and more varied than the western part. The Santiago Hills II Planned Community portion of the site is west of SR-241/261. It is undeveloped, with the exception of a 6 million-gallon water reservoir owned by IRWD and a Christmas tree farm at the northwest corner of Jamboree Road and Santiago Canyon Road. The proposed Santiago Hills II Planned Community portion of the site is crossed by Santiago Canyon Road and adjoins Jamboree Road. The East Orange Planned Community is located east of SR-241/261. East Orange Planned Community Area 1 is generally located north of Santiago Canyon Road, west and south of the closed Santiago Canyon Landfill, and east of SR-241/261. East Orange Planned Community Area 2 consists of steep hills and drainages on the north side of Santiago Canyon Road and east of the closed Santiago Canyon Landfill and Irvine Lake. East Orange Planned Community Area 3 is located on the south side of Santiago Canyon Road, east of East Orange Planned Community Area 2. East Orange Planned Community Areas 1, 2, and 3 are adjoined by permanently protected open space, including IRLR and The Nature Reserve, established by the Central/Coastal NCCP. The now-closed Santiago Canyon Landfill is located adjacent to the west side of Irvine Lake, north of Santiago Canyon Road. The landfill was operated by the County and is currently being capped. Eventually, the landfill slopes will be restored with native plant communities. East of the landfill is the 570-acre Irvine Lake, which is fed by flows from Santiago and Limestone Canyon Creeks. Irvine Lake, which is privately owned, offers a variety of recreational activities, including fishing, camping, rental boats, and hiking. Other facilities include a café and a bait and tackle shop. East of the reservoir, Black Star, Santiago, and Limestone Canyons contain well-developed riparian communities. A concrete batch plant is located on the eastern end of Irvine Lake in the Santiago Creek arm of the reservoir. It adjoins the site of a prior surface mining operation that is now being reclaimed. Reclamation efforts have resulted in the filling and leveling of the mining areas so that they are now above the level of Irvine Lake. 3A.3.3 Surrounding Land Uses The proposed project site is adjoined by the City of Orange to the west and unincorporated Orange County to the east. The Santiago Hills I residential development adjoins the western end of the proposed project site, as does Santiago Canyon College. Santiago Hills I includes both attached and detached dwellings, a school, police substation, fire station, and a neighborhood commercial center. In general, the lands are urbanized west of the project area in the City, to the southwest in Tustin, to the south in Irvine, and to the north in Anaheim. Santiago Canyon College is the 82-acre eastern campus of the Rancho Santiago Community College District. It offers a full curriculum to a student population exceeding 5,000. On the basis of a $337 million bond for renovation and new construction at Santiago Canyon College and the district’s Santa Ana College, the district will build a new student services building, library/learning center, science building, student activity and sports center, and parking facilities. Upon completion in approximately Santiago Hills II and East Orange October 2004 Planned Communities Draft SEIR/EIR 3A-3 J&S 03005.03 City of Orange 3A. Land Use 2018, Santiago Canyon College will have the capacity to meet the needs of a projected 20,000 students (Santiago Canyon College 2004). The proposed project area is bisected by SR-241/261 and Santiago Canyon Road and is surrounded by a range of existing land uses. On the west side of SR-241/261, Irvine Regional Park is north of the proposed site and Peters Canyon Regional Park flanks the area to the southwest. East of SR-241/261, extensive areas of natural open space abut the development areas, principally to the north and east. These open space areas include The Nature Reserve and IRLR. The western boundary of the Cleveland National Forest is approximately 2 to 3 miles east of the project area’s easternmost point. Irvine Regional Park encompasses approximately 477 acres. The park contains two lakes, an excursion railroad, and the Orange County Zoo. A variety of activities are available within the park, including picnicking, horseback riding, pony rides, and bicycling. Peters Canyon Regional Park occupies 354 acres west of SR-241/261 and south/east of Irvine Regional Park. It is a nature park with picnic areas and hiking/biking/equestrian trails. Portions of the Santiago Hills II and East Orange Planned Communities study area are included in the Central/Coastal NCCP. A reserve and associated implementation agreement specifying additional funding, adaptive management, and impact minimization measures were developed to protect the target species and habitat.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Vegetation Data from the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e71266 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e71266 Data Paper Current vegetation data from the Prioksko- Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve Mikhail Shovkun‡, Natalya Ivanova§§, Larisa Khanina , Michael S. Romanov§‡, Vasily Demidov ‡ Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve, Danki, Russia § Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology RAS – branch of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia Corresponding author: Mikhail Shovkun ([email protected]), Natalya Ivanova ([email protected]), Larisa Khanina ([email protected]), Vasily Demidov ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ivan Chadin Received: 08 Jul 2021 | Accepted: 17 Aug 2021 | Published: 25 Aug 2021 Citation: Shovkun M, Ivanova N, Khanina L, Romanov MS, Demidov V (2021) Current vegetation data from the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e71266. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e71266 Abstract Background Here we present the sampling event dataset that contributes to the knowledge of current vegetation of the Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reserve (part of the UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves), Moscow Region, Russia. The Reserve is situated on the terraces of the Oka River in the zone of mixed coniferous forests. New information The dataset provides 269 relevés (9174 associated occurrences) of renewed vegetation collected in 2019-2020. It is aimed at sampling vegetation data from the Reserve area with particular interest to sites with invasive species and sites with recent deadfall in the spruce stands caused by the bark beetle-typographer. The dataset contains representative information on plant communities in localities with assigned GPS coordinates, sampled using the standard relevé method with the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Reserve of Orange County
    NATURE RESERVE OF ORANGE COUNTY NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release June 13, 2016 Irvine, California-- Between June 18 to June 24 and July 5 to July 12, the Nature Communities Coalition (NCC), in collaboration with OC Parks, Irvine Ranch Conservancy, and The Nature Conservancy will conduct an aerial weed survey during daylight hours using a small, low-flying helicopter to document and map the distribution of over 30 weed species located within selected inland parks and open space areas. The resulting information will provide details about the abundance and distribution of invasive weeds and help land managers evaluate the effectiveness of current weed monitoring practices, identify emerging weed problems, and strategically plan future weed management actions. Notices describing the aerial weed survey will be posted at trailheads at participating parks and open space areas during the project period. The aerial weed survey will be focused on mapping the distribution of artichoke thistle and a minimum of 30 other established and emerging invasive weeds which degrade natural habitat values important to wildlife and the park visitor experience. The survey will cover nearly 32,000 acres and involve the following land areas (also see attached map): Aerial Survey Area Ownership Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park OC Parks Siphon Reservoir Irvine Ranch Water District City of Irvine Open Space Preserve North City of Irvine Irvine Ranch Open Space OC Parks Irvine Regional Park OC Parks Peters Canyon Regional Park OC Parks Santiago Oaks Regional Park OC Parks Coal Canyon Ecological Reserve California Department of Fish and Wildlife -OVER- The aerial survey will be conducted by an experienced team, Wildlands Conservation Science LLC, using a small helicopter (Schweizer-333) and a crew of three (an experienced pilot and two biologists conducting the survey).
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve
    Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve www.derrycity.gov.uk/biodiversity Bay Road Park Local Nature Reserve is a 20 ha former landfill site, located on the banks of the River Foyle, which provides impressive scenery of the Foyle Bridge, Foyle catchment and the City. It can Bay Road Park supports a wide range of habitats to include woodland, grassland, salt be accessed from the Foyle marsh and mudflats. These habitats support a wide range of species, with significant Bridge or behind Da Vinci’s population of wading and wintering birds, including six of Northern Ireland’s priority Hotel, off the Culmore Road. species: redshank, herring gull, song thrush, mistle thrush, starling and bullfinch. Also, international over-wintering birds feast on the eel grass and insects on the mudflats. The woodlands and wildflower meadows provide a habitat for a range of priority species, including eight species of butterflies, for example, orange tip, tortoiseshell, peacock and painted ladies. Also, the willow trees provide a habitat for the lunar hornet moth, which mimics the behaviour of This riverside green space is managed by a wasp. The range of moths provide a Derry City Council for biodiversity and valuable source of food for the bats recreation, with a pedestrian and cycle that use the site for feeding. Two bat network. species have been recorded utilizing It was launched as Derry City Council’s first the site, Pipistrelle and Daubenton bats. Local Nature Reserve in June 2009, for its biodiversity, access, community involvement During your visit you may catch sight of a and educational value.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Van Long Nature Reserve
    Van Long Nature Reserve Vietnam Van Long – local fishers cast nets in the limestone fringed community wetland By Dao Nguyen May 2008 Executive summary Van Long Nature Reserve is situated in Gia Vien district along the Northeastern border of Ninh Binh Province. Van Long straddles seven communes (local Government administrative units) and is in the heartland of the populated centre of north-eastern Vietnam, 85km south of the capitol, Hanoi. All the 45,000 or so people who live in these seven communes in the buffer zone of Van Long are of the Kinh ethnic Vietnamese majority. Van Long itself covers some 3,000 hectares and comprises two major geographic features. Firstly, Van Long is a large wetland and freshwater system. Secondly, the canals, lakes and streams wend through an island-like landscape of karst limestone mountains that harbour the only viable population of the Delacour Langur - one of the world’s most critically endangered species of primate (with less than 200 individuals remaining, globally). Without the protection afforded Van Long by the local community, and now by the Government and local authorities, it is highly probable that the Delacour langur would be the first primate extinction of the 21st Century. The name Van Long dates back centuries, and the community has evidenced a robust capacity to harness the natural resources of Van Long through decades of intense conflict and change, without diminishing their resource base. The cultural significance of the wetland-karst landscape is a vital part of local folklore and sense of place. With the outside discovery of the population of Delacour’s Langur in 1993, external attention to Van Long began to increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Proposal Title
    STATUS QUO TECHNICAL NOTE ENVIRONMENT South Eastern District Local Area Plan 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 This Technical Note represents part of the Phase Two Deliverable for the South Eastern District Local Area Plan. 1.1 DETAILS OF THE STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 1 Contract No. SCM 66 of 11/12 2 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS QUO ............................................................................................................... 1 Prepared for: 2.1 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE ......................................................................................................................... 1 Msunduzi Municipality 2.2 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2.1 Topography ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.2 Geology ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.3 Soils, Land Cover and Land Capability ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • E-367 Georgia
    E-367 GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Environmental Assessment, Environmental Management Plan 1. Introduction. The Government of Georgia (GoG) has requested that the International Public Disclosure Authorized Development Association (the Bank) provide support through the Global Environment Facility (GEF) for a Protected Areas Development Project. This Project will help the GoG to improve the conservation and sustainable use of Georgian biodiversity. 2. The project will: (i) establish three protected areas in eastern Georgia; (ii) facilitate the creation of a national network of protected areas; (iii) integrate biodiversity conservation into forestry, range management, and agriculture; (iv) strengthen institutions responsible for biodiversity conservation programs; (iv) improve public awareness of the values and importance of Georgian biodiversity; and (v) promote regional / international cooperation for conservation of biodiversity in the Caucasus region. 3. The Implementing Agency for the Project is the Georgia Department of Protected Areas. Financing for Project preparation commenced in March, 1999. Significant analysis and Public Disclosure Authorized proposals for Project financing were developed in partnership with the Department of Protected Areas administrations of three proposed project sites (Vashlovani, Lagodekhi and Tusheti); NGOs; the scientific community, international experts, and Georgian governmental institutions (Ministry of Environment). During project preparation, an environmental review identified the potential impacts of project activities and elaborated environmental review and management plan to be undertaken during project implementation. 4. The results of the environmental review and the recommended environmental management plan were the subject of public consultations held for each protected area site between June 12 and 14,2000. Comments were recorded in minutes (see Annex 5, Summary of Consultations; full minutes are available in Georgian from the Project Implementation Unit).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in NOWPAP Region
    Summary on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in NOWPAP Region (NOWPAP DINRAC, March 2010) 1. Overview This summary is based on the Database on Coastal and Marine Nature Reserves in the Northwest Pacific Region (NowpapNatureReserve, http://dinrac.nowpap.org/NowpapNatureReserve.php) which is developed and maintained by NOWPAP DINRAC. The data was collected and provided by the National Focal Points of DINRAC started from 2006 and updated periodically. The WDPA (World database of protected areas, http://www.wdpa-marine.org), and the Ramsar Sites Database (http://ramsar.wetlands.org) were also taken as reference. The summary intends to give an overview and understanding on current situation of marine and coastal protected areas (MPAs) in NOWPAP region. The MPAs - marine and coastal protected areas comprise the nature reserves, national parks, wetland protected areas (Ramsar Sites) in NOWPAP Region. The sea area mainly covers the Yellow Sea and Eastern Area of NOWPAP region. Based on the existing data, there are total 87 MPAs in NOWPAP region covers an area of 4,090,046ha (Table 1 to Table 3). The earliest MPA was established in October 1916 and the latest was in August 2007 (Table 4). The smallest area is 10ha in Japan and largest area is 909,000ha in China (Table 5). Statistics tables and figures below are conducted on number, area, protected level, protected type and protected objectives (species) for MPAs in NOWPAP (Table 6 and Fig.1 to Fig.5). The list (List 1) and the location of the MPAs (Map 1) are listed individually. 2. Statistics Table 1. Number of MPAs in NOWPAP Region by Country Level Protected Type Country Total Wild Municipal/ Natural Nature Number National Provincial animal and County ecosystem heritage plant China 20 9 5 6 15 17 17 Japan 31 17 14 0 31 31 20 Korea 22 22 0 0 22 20 13 Russia 14 7 7 0 14 14 7 Region 87 55 26 6 82 82 57 1 Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Impendle Nature Reserve
    IMPENDLE NATURE RESERVE KwaZulu-Natal South Africa Protected Area Management Plan: Public Participation Report 2012 Prepared by Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife Protected Area Management Planning Unit TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 2 1.1 The context of stakeholder consultation 2 1.2 Approach and objectives of the consultation process 2 1.3 Consultation process 4 2) KEY FINDINGS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS 6 3) COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN 7 REFERENCES APPENDIX A LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS WHO HAVE PARTICPATED IN OR BEEN INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR IMPENDLE NATURE RESERVE APPENDIX B MINUTES OF ADDITIONAL MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS HELD ON 4TH SEPTEMBER 2012 APPENDIX C SCANS OF THE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC REVIEW OF THE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX D BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT CIRCULATED PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX E COPIES OF STANDARD INVITATIONS SENT TO KNOWN STAKEHOLDERS FOR THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP APPENDIX F MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP IMPENDLE NATURE RESE RVE PROTECTED AREA MANAG EMENT PLAN – P U B L I C PA R TICIPATION REPORT 1 1) STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS The Impendle Nature Reserve en route to the Southern Drakensberg is situated approximately 15 km south from the town of Impendle in KZN with the main R617 road to Underberg passing through the reserve. It falls within the Ingwe Local Municipality and the Sisonke District Municipality and Impendle Local Municipality abuts the reserve along its northern border. Despite these boundaries the reserve is closer to the Impendle Local Municipality and the access to the reserve falls within this municipal area.
    [Show full text]
  • State Party Report on the State of Conservation of the Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe
    COORDINATION OFFICE E.C.O. Institute of Ecology Lakeside B07 b, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] State Party Report on the State of Conservation of the Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe submitted by Austria on behalf of the States Parties Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Ukraine Reference Number: 1133ter in response to World Heritage Committee Decisions 42 COM 7B.71 and 43 COM 7B.13 [for submission by 1st February 2020] 1 COORDINATION OFFICE E.C.O. Institute of Ecology Lakeside B07 b, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] Table of contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Executive summary of the report .................................................................................................... 8 2 Response to the Decision of the World Heritage Committee ......................................................... 9 2.1 Decision on legal protection status of Slovak component parts and logging in buffer zone (42 COM 7B.71 – 4).................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Decision on provision of legal protection on Slovak component parts (42 COM 7B.71 – 5) 10 2.3 Decision on Slovak proposal for boundary modifications (42 COM 7B.71 – 6) .................... 12 2.4 Decision
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas by Management 9
    Unted States p Forest Department a Service DRNA of Agriculture g P r o t e c t e d N a t u r a l A r e a s o f P u e r to R i c o K E E P I N G C O M M ON S P E C I E S C O M M O N PRGAP ANALYSIS PROJECT William A. Gould, Maya Quiñones, Mariano Solórzano, Waldemar Alcobas, and Caryl Alarcón IITF GIS and Remote Sensing Lab A center for tropical landscape analysis U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry . o c 67°30'0"W 67°20'0"W 67°10'0"W 67°0'0"W 66°50'0"W 66°40'0"W 66°30'0"W 66°20'0"W 66°10'0"W 66°0'0"W 65°50'0"W 65°40'0"W 65°30'0"W 65°20'0"W i R o t rotection of natural areas is essential to conserving biodiversity and r e u P maintaining ecosystem services. Benefits and services provided by natural United , Protected areas by management 9 States 1 areas are complex, interwoven, life-sustaining, and necessary for a healthy A t l a n t i c O c e a n 1 1 - 6 environment and a sustainable future (Daily et al. 1997). They include 2 9 0 clean water and air, sustainable wildlife populations and habitats, stable slopes, The Bahamas 0 P ccccccc R P productive soils, genetic reservoirs, recreational opportunities, and spiritual refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiating Benefit of Windbreak and Sand Fixation in the Baijitan Nature
    sustainability Article Radiating Benefit of Windbreak and Sand Fixation in the Baijitan Nature Reserve of Lingwu, Ningxia, China Chao Song 1 , Qiyin Yu 2, Ruixia Wang 3 and Guofa Cui 1,* 1 School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] 2 China National Forestry–Grassland Economics and Development Research Center, Beijing 100714, China; [email protected] 3 Ningxia Lingwu Baijitan National Nature Reserve Administration, Yinchuan 751400, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-13501036334 Abstract: Many important ecosystem services show spatial flow characteristics, which are crucial for the study of environmental processes, such as the transformation, correlation, coordination, and management of ecosystem services at different scales. As a result, flow characteristics should be taken into account when it comes to the evaluation of ecosystem services. The study area was the Baijitan Nature Reserve, used to assess the radiating benefits of the windbreak and sand fixation from 2000 to 2019, based on wind erosion loss and sand spatial erosion models. The main results are as follows: Firstly, the fractional vegetation coverage (FVC) clearly increased over the last 20 years and the medium coverage, which accounted for 66.13%, became the main vegetation cover. The wind speed in the reserve dropped gradually as well. Secondly, sand only affected the nature reserve and the surrounding communities. When the wind speed was above a strong breeze (10.8–13.8 m/s), coarse silt could affect 26 downwind administrative regions, with an affected area 6 2 Citation: Song, C.; Yu, Q.; Wang, R.; of 2.13 × 10 km .
    [Show full text]
  • Energy, Environment & Spatial
    ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT & SPATIAL PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT BRANCH Asieff Khan, Erica Essig, Mogamat Samsodien, Victoria Day, Bronwen Amayo, Shihabuddeen Khan and Tamaryn Khan (editing) Biodiversity Area: False Bay Nature Reserve Tel no: 021 396 4283 Email: [email protected] Temminck’s stint (Photo: C. Dorse 2016) Table of Contents Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. HIGHLIGHTS & CHALLENGES .............................................................................................................................................. 2 3. CONSERVATION PLANNING ............................................................................................................................................. 3 4. FLORA .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 5. FAUNA ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 6. SOIL ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 7. WATER ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]