(P22;Q22) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Results in Fusion of RUNX1 with the Ubiquitin-Specific Protease Gene USP42

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(P22;Q22) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Results in Fusion of RUNX1 with the Ubiquitin-Specific Protease Gene USP42 Leukemia (2006) 20, 224–229 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE A novel and cytogenetically cryptic t(7;21)(p22;q22) in acute myeloid leukemia results in fusion of RUNX1 with the ubiquitin-specific protease gene USP42 K Paulsson1,ANBe´ka´ssy2, T Olofsson3, F Mitelman1, B Johansson1 and I Panagopoulos1 1Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 2Department of Pediatrics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden and 3Department of Hematology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden Although many of the chromosomal abnormalities in hemato- blastic leukemias (ALLs),3 the t(5;14)(q35;q32), found in logic malignancies are identifiable cytogenetically, some are 10–20% of T-ALLs,3 and the del(4)(q12q12), which is characteristic only detectable using molecular methods. We describe a novel 4 cryptic t(7;21)(p22;q22) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). FISH, for hypereosinophilic syndrome. Considering the diagnostic, 30RACE, and RT-PCR revealed a fusion involving RUNX1 and prognostic, and biologic impact of leukemia-associated trans- the ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) gene USP42. The genomic locations and fusion genes, it is important to search for other breakpoint was in intron 7 of RUNX1 and intron 1 of USP42. The cryptic rearrangements that may be present in hematologic reciprocal chimera was not detected – neither on the transcrip- malignancies. 0 tional nor on the genomic level – and FISH showed that the 5 The RUNX1 gene (previously AML1, CBFA2), located at part of USP42 was deleted. USP42 maps to a 7p22 region 21q22, was first identified as one of the fusion partners in the characterized by segmental duplications. Notably, 17 kb dupli- 5 cons are present 1 Mb proximal to USP42 and 3 Mb proximal to t(8;21)(q22;q22) in AML-M2. Since then, RUNX1 has been RUNX1; these may be important in the genesis of t(7;21). This is shown to be involved in numerous translocations as well as the second cryptic RUNX1 translocation in hematologic malig- harboring mutations – germ line or acquired – in a substantial nancies and the first in AML. The USPs have not previously proportion of AML cases.6,7 RUNX1 codes for a transcription been reported to be rearranged in leukemias. The cellular factor belonging to the ‘RUNT domain’ gene family, and is a key context in which USP42 is active is unknown, but we here show 8 that it is expressed in normal bone marrow, in primary AMLs, regulator of hematopoiesis. The wild-type RUNX1 forms a and in cancer cell lines. Its involvement in the t(7;21) suggests heterodimer with CBFB – encoded by a gene targeted by the 9 that deregulation of ubiquitin-associated pathways may be inv(16)(p13q22) in AML-M4 – and the active complex pathogenetically important in AML. functions both as a transcriptional activator and as a repressor.8 Leukemia (2006) 20, 224–229. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404076; Apart from the t(12;21), which results in an ETV6/RUNX1 fusion published online 15 December 2005 in B-lineage ALL,10 and the recently described t(4;21)(q28;q22), Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; RUNX1; USP42; cryptic 11 translocation leading to a RUNX1/FGA7 chimera in T-ALL, RUNX1 is typically rearranged through translocations in AML and myelo- dysplastic syndromes (MDSs). To date, five in-frame fusion gene partners have been reported: RUNX1T1 (previously ETO, MTG8, CBFA2T1) at 8q22,12 MDS1/EVI1 at 3q26,13 CBFA2T3 (previously MTG16) at 16q24,14 PRDX4 at Xp22,15 and ZFPM2 Introduction (previously FOG2) at 8q23.16 The translocations resulting in these fusions have all been detectable with G-banding. In the The acquired, clonal chromosomal aberrations frequently found present study, we describe a novel and cytogenetically cryptic in hematologic malignancies are closely associated with t(7;21)(p22;q22) in AML, fusing RUNX1 with the ubiquitin- leukemogenesis. For example, the strong correlations that exist specific protease (USP) gene USP42, which is involved in the between certain balanced rearrangements and specific clinical, ubiquitin pathway.17 This is the second cryptic RUNX1 immunophenotypic, and morphologic patterns strongly indicate translocation described in hematologic malignancies, and the that these fusion gene-generating abnormalities play a major first in AML. It is also the first report of a fusion involving a USP 1 role in the transformation process. However, cytogenetically gene in hematologic malignancies. identifiable chromosomal aberrations are seen only in approxi- mately half of all acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs). This notwithstanding, it has been suggested that primary, balanced Patients, materials, and methods rearrangements – often resulting in chimeric genes – are 2 necessary for malignant hematologic disorders to arise. It Case history should be stressed that the absence of rearrangements does not A previously healthy 7-year-old boy was admitted to the hospital exclude the presence of chromosomal changes because the in March 1995 because of pyrexic tonsillitis and cervical resolution of standard cytogenetics is quite poor. In fact, some adenitis. The clinical examination was unremarkable. The cryptic aberrations, detectable only with molecular methods, peripheral blood values were hemoglobin 102 g/l, white blood have been shown to be quite common, for example, the 9 9 cell count 35.6 Â 10 , with 1.4 Â 10 /l granulocytes and t(12;21)(p13;q22), occurring in 20% of B-lineage acute lympho- 9 24.9 Â 10 atypical monocytic cells, and thrombocytes 69 Â 109/l. The bone marrow (BM) aspirate was hypercellular, Correspondence: Dr K Paulsson, Department of Clinical Genetics, containing blasts difficult to classify morphologically. Flow University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] cytometric two-color analysis showed that 75–80% of the BM Received 4 July 2005; revised 10 October 2005; accepted 18 October cells were positive for HLA-DR, CD34, CD33, CD13, CD11c, 2005; published online 15 December 2005 CD7, CD5, and CD4, and partly positive for CD56 but negative Cryptic RUNX1/USP42 fusion in AML K Paulsson et al 225 for B-lymphocytic markers. The diagnosis was AML-M0 with 400 ng of genomic DNA as template, and the amplified aberrant expression of T-lymphocyte-associated markers. The fragments were sequenced (Supplementary Table 2). Attempts chromosome analysis revealed a seemingly normal male were also made to amplify the reciprocal genomic fusion with karyotype. The patient received treatment according to the primer pairs listed in Supplementary Table 2. NOPHO-AML-93 protocol.18 After induction therapy, the BM still contained 25% blasts; three additional chemotherapy blocks were needed to achieve complete remission (CR) (May RT-PCR and Northern blot expression analyses 1995). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with an HLA To investigate the expression of USP42, RT-PCR was performed identical sister as a donor, was performed in June 1995. BM (Supplementary Table 2) using cDNA from two normal BM, two relapse occurred in March 2000, at which time the karyotype childhood AMLs (one with a normal karyotype and one with a was 46,XY,t(4;6)(q24;p11),del(5)(q15),t(11;18)(q23;q21)[24]. t(8;21)), and two adult AMLs (one with a complex karyotype and The immunophenotype was essentially the same as at diagnosis. one with an add(7)(p22)) as template. Northern blot analysis was A second CR was achieved with a single cytoreductive performed, utilizing the Human Cancer Cell Line MTN Blot (BD chemotherapy course in April 2000. Then, donor lymphocyte Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA), containing poly A þ infusions were given on three occasions. The patient is a RNA, on the cancer cell lines HL-60 (AML), HeLa S3, K-562 complete donor chimera, with no signs of the disease on the (CML), MOLT-4 (T-ALL), Raji (Burkitt’s lymphoma), SW480 latest follow-up in April 2005. (colorectal adenocarcinoma), A549 (lung carcinoma), and G-361 (melanoma). A probe for USP42 was obtained by RT-PCR using the primers USP42-127F and USP42-562R (Supplemen- FISH analyses tary Table 2) with K-562 cDNA as template. The probe was The t(7;21) was originally detected with a whole chromosome labeled with 32P using the RediprimeII labelling system paint (WCP) probe for chromosome 7. To characterize the (Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK). translocation, FISH was performed according to standard protocols on BM cells, obtained at diagnosis and relapse. For multicolor-FISH (M-FISH), WCP probes for combined binary Additional cases ratio labeling-FISH were used.19 RUNX1 rearrangements were As the t(7;21)(p22;q22) is not visible with G-banding, we investigated with the LSI AML1/ETO and the LSI TEL/AML1 screened additional cases for the RUNX1/USP42 fusion with RT- probes, covering the whole RUNX1 gene (Vysis, Downers PCR (Supplementary Table 2). These included 25 childhood Grove, IL, USA). BACs and PACs used for mapping of the AMLs with available RNA, regardless of karyotypic features, four chromosome 7 breakpoint were generously supplied by Dr M adult AML-M0 with various chromosome abnormalities, and Rocchi, Bari, Italy (Supplementary Table 1). The fosmids four adult AMLs with 7p aberrations. G248P88689C2 and G248P8048B11, specific for the 50 and 30 parts of USP42, respectively, were also applied (BACPAC Resources, St Oakland, CA, USA). In addition, WCP probes Results for chromosomes 7 and 21 were utilized (Vysis). FISH reveals a translocation of RUNX1 to 7p and narrows down the chromosome 7 breakpoint region 30RACE and gene-specific RT-PCR to 1.2 Mb Total RNA was extracted according to standard methods from The karyotype was normal at the time of diagnosis (Figure 1a); at BM cells, obtained at relapse. First-strand cDNA synthesis was relapse, several abnormalities were identified, none of which performed with the SMART RACE cDNA Amplification kit (BD involved chromosomes 7 or 21.
Recommended publications
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Deubiquitinases in Cancer: New Functions and Therapeutic Options
    Oncogene (2012) 31, 2373–2388 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/12 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Deubiquitinases in cancer: new functions and therapeutic options JM Fraile1, V Quesada1, D Rodrı´guez, JMP Freije and C Lo´pez-Otı´n Departamento de Bioquı´mica y Biologı´a Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto Universitario de Oncologı´a, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain Deubiquitinases (DUBs) have fundamental roles in the Hunter, 2010). Consistent with the functional relevance ubiquitin system through their ability to specifically of proteases in these processes, alterations in their deconjugate ubiquitin from targeted proteins. The human structure or in the mechanisms controlling their genome encodes at least 98 DUBs, which can be grouped spatiotemporal expression patterns and activities cause into 6 families, reflecting the need for specificity in diverse pathologies such as arthritis, neurodegenerative their function. The activity of these enzymes affects the alterations, cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Accord- turnover rate, activation, recycling and localization ingly, many proteases are an important focus of of multiple proteins, which in turn is essential for attention for the pharmaceutical industry either as drug cell homeostasis, protein stability and a wide range of targets or as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers signaling pathways. Consistent with this, altered DUB (Turk, 2006; Drag and Salvesen, 2010). function has been related to several diseases, including The recent availability of the genome sequence cancer. Thus, multiple DUBs have been classified as of different organisms has facilitated the identification oncogenes or tumor suppressors because of their regula- of their entire protease repertoire, which has been tory functions on the activity of other proteins involved in defined as degradome (Lopez-Otin and Overall, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Noelia Díaz Blanco
    Effects of environmental factors on the gonadal transcriptome of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), juvenile growth and sex ratios Noelia Díaz Blanco Ph.D. thesis 2014 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF). This work has been carried out at the Group of Biology of Reproduction (GBR), at the Department of Renewable Marine Resources of the Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC). Thesis supervisor: Dr. Francesc Piferrer Professor d’Investigació Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) i ii A mis padres A Xavi iii iv Acknowledgements This thesis has been made possible by the support of many people who in one way or another, many times unknowingly, gave me the strength to overcome this "long and winding road". First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Francesc Piferrer, for his patience, guidance and wise advice throughout all this Ph.D. experience. But above all, for the trust he placed on me almost seven years ago when he offered me the opportunity to be part of his team. Thanks also for teaching me how to question always everything, for sharing with me your enthusiasm for science and for giving me the opportunity of learning from you by participating in many projects, collaborations and scientific meetings. I am also thankful to my colleagues (former and present Group of Biology of Reproduction members) for your support and encouragement throughout this journey. To the “exGBRs”, thanks for helping me with my first steps into this world. Working as an undergrad with you Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, C12Q 1/68 (2018.01) A61P 31/18 (2006.01) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, C12Q 1/70 (2006.01) HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (21) International Application Number: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, PCT/US2018/056167 OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (22) International Filing Date: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 16 October 2018 (16. 10.2018) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, (30) Priority Data: UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, 62/573,025 16 October 2017 (16. 10.2017) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, ΓΕ , IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (71) Applicant: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TECHNOLOGY [US/US]; 77 Massachusetts Avenue, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Personalized Diagnostics
    The Center for PERSONALIZED DIAGNOSTICS Precision Diagnostics for Personalized Medicine PennMedicine.org/CPD | 215.615.3966 The Center for Personalized Diagnostics (CPD) is a joint initiative between Penn Medicine’s Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and the Abramson Cancer Center. The Center integrates molecular genetics, pathology informatics and genomic pathology to develop personalized diagnostic profiles for individuals with cancer. The CPD offers the highest volume of genome testing in the region. PENNSEQTM HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES PANEL ABL1 CD79A FANCA IKZF1 NOTCH1 RIT1 TERT ASXL1 CD79B FANCC IL7R NOTCH2 RPS15 TET2 ATM CDKN2A FANCD2 JAK2 NPM1 RRAGC TNFAIP3 B2M CEBPA FANCE JAK3 NRAS RUNX1 TNFRSF14 BCL2 CIITA FANCF KIT PALB2 SETBP1 TP53 BCOR CREBBP FANCG KLF2 PDGFRA SF1 TPMT BCORL1 CSF1R FANCL KLHL6 PHF6 SF3A1 TRAF3 BIRC3 CSF3R FANCM KRAS PLCG1 SF3B1 U2AF1 BRAF CXCR4 FBXW7 MAP2K1 PLCG2 SLX4 U2AF2 BRCA1 DDX3X FLT3 MAPK1 POT1 SMC1A WT1 BRCA2 DDX41 GATA2 MIR142 PRPF40B SOCS1 XPO1 BRINP3 DICER1 GNA13 MPL PTEN SRSF2 XRCC2 BRIP1 DNMT3A GNAS MYC PTPN11 STAG2 ZMYM3 BTK EGR2 HNRNPK MYCN RAD21 STAT3 ZRSR2 CALR ERCC4 ID3 MYD88 RAD51 STAT5B CARD11 ETV6 IDH1 NF1 RAD51C TBL1XR1 CBL EZH2 IDH2 NFKBIE RHOA TCF3 • Accepted Specimens: Blood; bone marrow; formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) • Detects: Single nucleotide variants (SNVs); small indels; copy number gains in ABL1, tissue; fresh tissue in PreservCyt PDGFRA, and MYC • Minimum Requirements: 10% tumor nuclei for tissue, 100ng of DNA (non-FFPE), 200ng • Limitations: Lower limit
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2012/174282 A2 20 December 2012 (20.12.2012) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2012/174282 A2 20 December 2012 (20.12.2012) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: David [US/US]; 13539 N . 95th Way, Scottsdale, AZ C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) 85260 (US). (21) International Application Number: (74) Agent: AKHAVAN, Ramin; Caris Science, Inc., 6655 N . PCT/US20 12/0425 19 Macarthur Blvd., Irving, TX 75039 (US). (22) International Filing Date: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 14 June 2012 (14.06.2012) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, English (25) Filing Language: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, Publication Language: English DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, (30) Priority Data: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 61/497,895 16 June 201 1 (16.06.201 1) US MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 61/499,138 20 June 201 1 (20.06.201 1) US OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SC, SD, 61/501,680 27 June 201 1 (27.06.201 1) u s SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, 61/506,019 8 July 201 1(08.07.201 1) u s TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Elucidating Biological Roles of Novel Murine Genes in Hearing Impairment in Africa
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 19 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0222.v1 Review Elucidating Biological Roles of Novel Murine Genes in Hearing Impairment in Africa Oluwafemi Gabriel Oluwole,1* Abdoulaye Yal 1,2, Edmond Wonkam1, Noluthando Manyisa1, Jack Morrice1, Gaston K. Mazanda1 and Ambroise Wonkam1* 1Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa. 2Department of Neurology, Point G Teaching Hospital, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology, Bamako, Mali. *Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: The prevalence of congenital hearing impairment (HI) is highest in Africa. Estimates evaluated genetic causes to account for 31% of HI cases in Africa, but the identification of associated causative genes mutations have been challenging. In this study, we reviewed the potential roles, in humans, of 38 novel genes identified in a murine study. We gathered information from various genomic annotation databases and performed functional enrichment analysis using online resources i.e. genemania and g.proflier. Results revealed that 27/38 genes are express mostly in the brain, suggesting additional cognitive roles. Indeed, HERC1- R3250X had been associated with intellectual disability in a Moroccan family. A homozygous 216-bp deletion in KLC2 was found in two siblings of Egyptian descent with spastic paraplegia. Up to 27/38 murine genes have link to at least a disease, and the commonest mode of inheritance is autosomal recessive (n=8). Network analysis indicates that 20 other genes have intermediate and biological links to the novel genes, suggesting their possible roles in HI.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material Contents
    Supplementary Material Contents Immune modulating proteins identified from exosomal samples.....................................................................2 Figure S1: Overlap between exosomal and soluble proteomes.................................................................................... 4 Bacterial strains:..............................................................................................................................................4 Figure S2: Variability between subjects of effects of exosomes on BL21-lux growth.................................................... 5 Figure S3: Early effects of exosomes on growth of BL21 E. coli .................................................................................... 5 Figure S4: Exosomal Lysis............................................................................................................................................ 6 Figure S5: Effect of pH on exosomal action.................................................................................................................. 7 Figure S6: Effect of exosomes on growth of UPEC (pH = 6.5) suspended in exosome-depleted urine supernatant ....... 8 Effective exosomal concentration....................................................................................................................8 Figure S7: Sample constitution for luminometry experiments..................................................................................... 8 Figure S8: Determining effective concentration .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Proteasomal Deubiquitinating Enzyme PSMD14 Regulates Macroautophagy by Controlling Golgi-To-ER Retrograde Transport
    Supplementary Materials The proteasomal deubiquitinating enzyme PSMD14 regulates macroautophagy by controlling Golgi-to-ER retrograde transport Bustamante HA., et al. Figure S1. siRNA sequences directed against human PSMD14 used for Validation Stage. Figure S2. Primer pairs sequences used for RT-qPCR. Figure S3. The PSMD14 DUB inhibitor CZM increases the Golgi apparatus area. Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of the Golgi area in parental H4 cells treated for 4 h either with the vehicle (DMSO; Control) or CZM. The Golgi marker GM130 was used to determine the region of interest in each condition. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t-test. Bars represent the mean ± SEM (n =43 cells). ***P <0.001. Figure S4. CZM causes the accumulation of KDELR1-GFP at the Golgi apparatus. HeLa cells expressing KDELR1-GFP were either left untreated or treated with CZM for 30, 60 or 90 min. Cells were fixed and representative confocal images were acquired. Figure S5. Effect of CZM on proteasome activity. Parental H4 cells were treated either with the vehicle (DMSO; Control), CZM or MG132, for 90 min. Protein extracts were used to measure in vitro the Chymotrypsin-like peptidase activity of the proteasome. The enzymatic activity was quantified according to the cleavage of the fluorogenic substrate Suc-LLVY-AMC to AMC, and normalized to that of control cells. The statistical significance was determined by One-Way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Bars represent the mean ± SD of biological replicates (n=3). **P <0.01; n.s., not significant. Figure S6. Effect of CZM and MG132 on basal macroautophagy. (A) Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of the subcellular localization of LC3 in parental H4 cells treated with either with the vehicle (DMSO; Control), CZM for 4 h or MG132 for 6 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Data ASXL2 Regulates Hematopoiesis in Mice and Its
    Supplementary data ASXL2 regulates hematopoiesis in mice and its deficiency promotes myeloid expansion Supplementary Methods Genomic DNA extraction Genomic DNA was extracted from BM mononuclear cells using a DNA extraction kit (Puregene Gentra System, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was quantified using Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and DNA integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. For samples with low quantity, DNA was amplified using REPLI-g Ultrafast mini kit (Qiagen). Peripheral blood analysis Complete peripheral blood counts were analysed using Abbott Cell-Dyn 3700 hematology analyzer (Abbott Laboratories). Expression analysis of Asxl2 and Asxl1 Transcript levels of Asxl2 and Asxl1 were estimated using quantitative RT-PCR with following primers: Asxl2 primer set 1, ATTCGACAAGAGATTGAGAAGGAG (forward) and TTTCTGTGAATCTTCAAGGCTTAG (reverse); Asxl2 primer set 2, GCCCTTAACAATGAGTTCTTCACT (forward) and TCCACAGCTCTACTTTCTTCTCCT (reverse); Asxl1 primers, GGTGGAACAATGGAAGGAAA (forward) and CTGGCCGAGAACGTTTCTTA (reverse). Asxl2 protein was detected in immunoblot using anti-ASXL2 antibody (Bethyl). In vitro differentiation of bone marrow cells Bone marrow (BM) cells were cultured in IMDM containing 20% FBS and 10 ng/ml IL3, 10 ng/ml IL6, 20 ng/ml SCF and 20 ng/ml GMCSF for two weeks. For FACS analysis, cells were washed, stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies and analysed on FACS LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FACSDIVA software (BD Biosciences). Colony re-plating assay Bone marrow cells were plated in methylcellulose medium containing mouse stem cell factor (SCF), mouse interleukin 3 (IL-3), human interleukin 6 (IL-6) and human erythropoietin (MethoCult GF M3434; StemCell Technologies). Colonies were enumerated after 9-12 days and cells were harvested for re-plating.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Journal
    Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology Home Genes Leukemias Solid Tumours Cancer-Prone Deep Insight Portal Teaching X Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NA Atlas Journal Atlas Journal versus Atlas Database: the accumulation of the issues of the Journal constitutes the body of the Database/Text-Book. TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 12, Number 6, Nov-Dec 2008 Previous Issue / Next Issue Genes BCL8 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 8) (15q11). Silvia Rasi, Gianluca Gaidano. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2008; 12 (6): 781-784. [Full Text] [PDF] URL : http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Genes/BCL8ID781ch15q11.html CDC25A (Cell division cycle 25A) (3p21). Dipankar Ray, Hiroaki Kiyokawa. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2008; 12 (6): 785-791. [Full Text] [PDF] URL : http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Genes/CDC25AID40004ch3p21.html CDC73 (cell division cycle 73, Paf1/RNA polymerase II complex component, homolog (S. cerevisiae)) (1q31.2). Leslie Farber, Bin Tean Teh. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2008; 12 (6): 792-797. [Full Text] [PDF] URL : http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Genes/CDC73D181ch1q31.html EIF3C (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit C) (16p11.2). Daniel R Scoles. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2008; 12 (6): 798-802. [Full Text] [PDF] URL : http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Genes/EIF3CID44187ch16p11.html ELAC2 (elaC homolog 2 (E. coli)) (17p11.2). Yang Chen, Sean Tavtigian, Donna Shattuck. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2008; 12 (6): 803-806. [Full Text] [PDF] URL : http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Genes/ELAC2ID40437ch17p11.html FOXM1 (forkhead box M1) (12p13). Jamila Laoukili, Monica Alvarez Fernandez, René H Medema.
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet
    Correlation to non-HGNT Accesion group 2 Description AA897204 1.479917 ESTs T85111 1.286576 null T60168 | AI821353 1.274487 thyroid transcription factor 1 AA600173 1.183065 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A (RAD6 homolog) R55745 1.169339 ELAV (embryonic lethal, abnormal vision, Drosophila)-like 4 (Hu antigen D) AA400492 1.114935 ESTs AA864791 1.088826 hypothetical protein FLJ21313 N53758 1.070402 EST AI216628 1.067763 ESTs AI167637 1.058561 ESTs AA478265 1.056331 similar to transmembrane receptor Unc5H1 AA969924 1.039315 EST AI074650 1.039043 hypothetical protein FLJ13842 R20763 1.035807 ELAV (embryonic lethal, abnormal vision, Drosophila)-like 3 (Hu antigen C) AI347081 1.034518 Ca2+-dependent activator protein for secretion R44386 1.028005 ESTs AA976699 1.027227 chromogranin A (parathyroid secretory protein 1) AA634475 1.026766 KIAA1796 protein AA496809 1.02432 SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 1 H16572 1.013059 null H29013 1.002117 seizure related 6 homolog (mouse)-like AI299731 1.001053 Homo sapiens nanos mRNA, partial cds AA400194 0.9950039 EST AI216537 | AI820870 0.9737153 Homo sapiens cDNA FLJ39674 fis, clone SMINT2009505 AA426408 0.9728649 type I transmembrane receptor (seizure-related protein) AA971742 | AI733380 0.9707561 achaete-scute complex-like 1 (Drosophila) R41450 0.9655133 ESTs AA487505 0.9636143 immunoglobulin superfamily, member 4 AA404337 0.957686 thymus high mobility group box protein TOX N68578 0.9552571 ESTs R45008 0.9422938 ELAV (embryonic lethal, abnormal
    [Show full text]