DOCSLIB.ORG

ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS and the ICC What Does the Application of the Crimes of the Rome Statute to the Continued Existence and Expan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS and the ICC What Does the Application of the Crimes of the Rome Statute to the Continued Existence and Expan ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS AND THE ICC What does the application of the crimes of the Rome Statute to the continued existence and expansion of Israeli Settlements in the West Bank reveal about the operation of the Rome Statute? Simon McKenzie ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0709-3943 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 Melbourne Law School The University of Melbourne 1 ABSTRACT The International Criminal Court, established by the Rome Statute, was created to provide a venue of last resort for the prosecution of the most serious international crimes. However, whether the Statute successfully established a coherent and legally effective system of international criminal justice is open to question. This thesis examines this issue by considering how the crimes of the Rome Statute might apply to the continued existence and expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The examination reveals some of the difficulties caused by incorporating the principles and obligations of international humanitarian law generally and the law of military occupation specifically into the crimes of the Rome Statute. This methodological approach allows for parts of the Statute to be ‘stress-tested’ to see how they meet, or fail to meet, the Statute’s broader aim of establishing a coherent and legally effective international criminal justice system where the law is knowable, predictable, and able to be applied. Two crimes have been identified as being particularly relevant to the settlements. First, the war crime of transfer of population in article 8(2)(b)(viii) and second, the war crime of unlawful appropriation of property in article 8(2)(a)(iv). The texts of these two war crimes in the Rome Statute are taken verbatim from relevant provisions of international humanitarian law (IHL) and the law of occupation more specifically. This thesis also addresses the threshold question of whether the law of occupation applies to the West Bank, and how the principles of individual criminal responsibility, and specifically common purpose liability, might operate in this context. The study of the operation of these crimes shows some of the consequences of taking clauses from IHL and inserting them wholesale into the Rome Statute, without any amendments to reflect the reality that individual criminal responsibility is different from state responsibility. This thesis demonstrates how the interface between IHL and international criminal law can be problematic. It shows how the adoption of vague and flexible principles from IHL into crimes for which individuals can be held liable has the potential to cause serious inconsistencies between IHL doctrine and the operation of international criminal law. In addition, in the event of an investigation or prosecution in relation to the settlements, the thesis provides a point of comparison to the legal approaches of the 2 Prosecution and of the Court’s Chambers, allowing for an assessment of how each organ is carrying out their roles, and providing insight into how each organ may perform in any specific future case. While the thesis does not set out to determine the criminal responsibility of any particular individual, it does in some instances stake a claim about what is the most persuasive legal position to take on the scope and operation of the crimes. Deviation by the Prosecutor or the Judges from these positions could reveal a different attitude to the most persuasive legal position to take but may also suggest something about the priorities and operation of the relevant organs of the Court. 3 DECLARATION I make the following declaration: (i) The thesis comprises only my original work towards the PhD except where indicated in the preface; (ii) Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used; (iii) The thesis is fewer than the maximum work limit in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. Simon McKenzie 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who have supported me while I have been researching and writing my thesis. I have been surrounded by friends, generously supported by my family, and I am grateful for the opportunity I have had to spend over three years exploring this topic at the University of Melbourne. It has been a long, but very worthwhile, journey. Tim Hawkins was a graduate of the University of Tasmania who tragically died in the Bali Bombings in 2002, and his family, friends and associates established a scholarship to commemorate him. I was fortunate to be awarded this scholarship in 2012, and it allowed me to spend several months working at the International Criminal Court in the Office of the Prosecutor. My time in The Hague was a formative experience. It helped me appreciate both the possibilities and limits of international criminal justice, and caused me to think more deeply about the importance of the Prosecution and Court engaging in careful legal analysis to both live up to the requirements of justice, ensuring legal rights for the accused while promoting the accountability of the guilty. I would not be continuing to explore these ideas in this thesis without this generous scholarship, and I hope this work is a fitting testament to Tim Hawkins’ memory. I am indebted to my principal supervisor, Tim McCormack. I first got to know Tim during my time at the International Criminal Court, where I worked as his research assistant in his capacity as Special Advisor on International Humanitarian Law. As a fellow Tasmanian who also grew up in Burnie, he has long been a model of what it was possible achieve, even when you come from somewhere on the edge of the periphery. As his PhD student, I have appreciated his good humour, his thoughtful advice, and care and support. He has been an invaluable guide throughout the process. I am also very grateful of the support of my other supervisor, Bruce Oswald. His warmth, availability and incisive advice has been outstanding. He has continued to push me to ensure that I have thought about how my research interacts with international law more broadly, while not losing sight of the legal technicalities of a doctrinal analysis. I am very grateful for the genuine care he has had as my supervisor, and my PhD experience would have not been nearly as rewarding without his efforts. I have been the beneficiary of guidance from many others at the Law School. Rain Liivoja, Rosemary Grey and Monique Cormier have all kindly read through parts of 5 my thesis and given me very helpful advice and encouragement. I have also had productive discussions that have made a real contribution to the direction of my study with John Tobin, Alison Duxbury, Peter Rush, Tim Lindsay, Madelaine Chiam and Anna Hood. I have spent my time at the Melbourne Law School sitting amongst friends, which has made coming into work a real pleasure. It has been a lot of fun to share an end of level nine of the Law School with, at various times, Monique, Maddy, Alison, Rebecca Nelson, Anna Hood, Sophie Rigney, Leticia Villeneuve and Michelle Lesh. I am sure it is why I did not find the PhD experience the lonely time I was warned of; instead, I have found it collegiate and rewarding. I visited Israel during my study, and was hosted by the Minerva Center for Human Rights at Hebrew University. They invited me to join the induction fortnight of the Human Rights under Pressure (‘HR-UP’) interdisciplinary doctoral study group. It was a remarkable experience and profoundly enriched my perspective on the situation in Israel and Palestine, and allowed me to participate in some compelling and confronting conversations about law, ethics and politics. It made me think much more deeply about my thesis, as well as so much more. I am very grateful to Tomer Broude and Danny Evron and the HR-UP doctoral students for being so welcoming of me during the time that I joined them. The thesis would not have been possible without the institutional support of the Melbourne Law School and the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship I was fortunate enough to receive. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their continued and unwavering support over my study, and for long before. Both of my parents Leanne and Colin, and my brother Alex, are always available, and are kind enough to read my work and discuss it with me. My interest in law and how it relates to the ideal of justice is due in no small part to the conversations we had around the kitchen table about how law at its best can be a force for good in the world, and that the task of making our legal system live up to the principles of justice was something that all lawyers share. August 2017 6 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 14 I. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 16 II. OVERVIEW OF THE FACTUAL SITUATION .......................................................... 23 THE WAR OF 1967, THE OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE AND THE SETTLEMENTS ......... 23 PALESTINE AND THE ICC .................................................................................................. 29 III. CHAPTER OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 30 IV. ‘ELEMENT ANALYSIS’ APPROACH ........................................................................ 31 V. INTERPRETATION OF THE ROME STATUTE ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Center for Jewish Law & Judaic Studies
    D E PAUL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Center for Jewish Law & Judaic Studies Past Events DePaul University College of Law Center for Jewish Law & Judaic Studies – Past Programming 2017-2018 • The Gerald C. Bender Memorial Lecture - The Israeli Supreme Court: A Force for or Against Democracy? Sunday, December 3, 2017 KEYNOTE SPEAKER: Professor Steven Resnicoff, DePaul University, Professor of Law & Director of JLJS FEATURED SPEAKERS: Rabbi Yona Reiss, JD, Av Bet Din, Chicago Rabbinical Council, and Robert W. Matanky, President of Matanky and Matanky, Ltd. The program offered 2 hours of CLE credit. • Between the Lines: Voices of Israel, Stories Untold Tuesday, October 31, 2017 Two inspiring young Israelis, Shir and Carlos, shared their stories – their struggles, their successes, and their hopes and dreams. They spoke about what it is actually like to live in a country that is the subject of so much discussion in the media and on campus. Video of the lecture can be found here. • Intersecting Identities: Black And Jewish In America 2017 Thursday, October 26th Stacey Aviva Flint, the current Outreach and Engagement Coordinator and member at West Suburban Temple Har Zion in River Forest, Illinois. As a Jew of Color, Stacey writes and speaks on the intersection of Black and Jewish experiences. Video of the lecture can be found here. • The First Amendment and Combating Antisemitism Online Thursday, October 19, 2017 Presenters: Amy Stoken, Chicago Regional Director at American Jewish Committee (AJC) Professor Steven H. Resnicoff, DePaul University, Professor of Law and Director of JLJS The program offered 1.5 hours of CLE credit.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Israel Hillbrow One of the Most Challenging Synagogues to Keep Functioning in the Way That Most of Us Envisage the Purpose of Our Local Shuls
    Temple Israel 1936-2016 צדק צדק תרדוף Justice, justice shall you pursue תיקון עולם Repairing the world “The mission of Temple Israel is to implement the ideals of our faith by supporting every positive and progressive endeavour to establish social justice in co-operation with all men of goodwill, and to promote within the congregation of Israel, projects of social justice and social service… regardless of race, colour or creed.” Rabbi Moses Cyrus Weiler CONTENTS Editor’s Note 2 CREDITS Message from Reeva Forman, chairman of Temple Israel 3 Editor LETTERS Darryl Egnal, Creative Heart Weiler family 4 SA Cell: +27 79 670 1433 Letter from SAUPJ 5 Israel Cell: +972 54 884 5237 Letter from WUPJ 6 Email: [email protected] Letter from EUPJ 7 SA Association of Progressive Rabbis 8 Design Susan Heiman, iMedi8 Graphics SA Jewish Board of Deputies 9 Email: [email protected] SA Zionist Federation 9 Letters from religious leaders 10 Advertising sales Johannesburg Metro Police Department 35 Marion Bubly, Reeva Forman, Darryl Egnal HISTORY How Progressive Judaism began in South Africa 12 Printing Timeline 28 Nippy Print Global players 35 TSEDEK, TSEDEK TIRDOF / TIKKUN OLAM The pursuit of justice and charity 40 The Sisterhood 44 The MC Weiler School 46 Afrika Tikkun interview with Reeva 49 Chairman: Reeva Forman GENERAL ARTICLES Tel: +27 11 726 2025 Temple Israel declared a Heritage site 37 Cell: +27 83 228 7777 A vision for tomorrow 38 Email: [email protected] New Temple Israel exhibition 39 Benny Stalson – Keeping Temple Israel alive 50 Treasurer:
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Kaush Arha Senior Advisor for Strategic Engagement, United States Agency for International Development (Usaid)
    FORUM SPEAKERS H.E. NOVRUZ MAMMADOV PRIME MINISTER OF AZERBAIJAN Mr. Novruz Mammadov was appointed Prime Minister of Azerbaijan in April 2018. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Mammadov was serving as an Assistant to the President of Azerbaijan on foreign issues as well as serving as Head of the Department of Lexicology and Stylistics of the French Language at the Azerbaijan University of Languages. Previously, Mr. Mammadov has served as a senior interpreter in Algeria and Guinea, Dean of Preparatory Faculty and Dean of Faculty of the French Language at the Azerbaijan Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages, Head of the Foreign Relations Department of the Presidential Administration of Azerbaijan, and interpreter to former President of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev. He was granted the rank of Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador by the decree of the President of Azerbaijan in January 2002 and in September 2005, Mr. Mammadov became a member of the National Commission of the Republic of Azerbaijan for UNESCO. Mr. Mammadov has received a number of honors including the French Legion d’Honneur Order by former French President Jacques Chirac, the Order of the Legion of Honor of Poland by former Polish President Lech Kaczyński, and the Order of Glory (Shohrat) by the decree of the President of Azerbaijan. MR. ELDAR ABAKIROV DEPUTY MINISTER OF ECONOMY OF KYRGYZSTAN Eldar Abakirov is Deputy Minister of Economy of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan and a Board Member of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Kyrgyzstan. From 2010-11 he worked as an expert at the National Bank of Kyrgyzstan and from 2003-10 he held several positions including Chief Specialist to the Deputy Director of the Treasury Department at JSC Bank Center Credit in Almaty, Kazakhstan.
    [Show full text]
  • Icc-01/18-73 16-03-2020 1/30 Ek Pt
    ICC-01/18-73 16-03-2020 1/30 EK PT Original: English No.: ICC-01/18 Date: 16 March 2020 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou SITUATION IN THE STATE OF PALESTINE Public Submissions Pursuant to Rule 103 Source: Professors Asem Khalil & Halla Shoaibi No. ICC-01/18 1/30 16 March 2020 ICC-01/18-73 16-03-2020 2/30 EK PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Ms. Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor Mr James Stewart, Deputy Prosecutor Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence Ms. Paolina Massidda States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Counsel Support Section Mr Peter Lewis, Registrar Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section Mr. Philipp Ambach, Chief No. ICC-01/18 2/30 16 March 2020 ICC-01/18-73 16-03-2020 3/30 EK PT Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 II. SUBMISSIONS..................................................................................................................... 4 A. The absence of enforcement jurisdiction does not negate prescriptive jurisdiction. .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Law Reports of Trial of War Criminals, Volume VI, English Edition
    LAW REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS Selected and prepared by THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION VOLUME VI LONDON PUBLISHED FOR THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 194 8 Price 5S. cd. net Official Publications on THE TRIAL OF GERMAN MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS AT NUREMBERG JUDGMENT Judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Trial of German Major War Criminals: September 30 and October 1, 1946 (Cmd. 6964) 2s. 6d. (2s. 8d.) SPEECHES Opening speeches of the Chief Prosecutors 2s. 6d. (2s. 9d.) Speeches of the Chief Prosecutors at the Close of the Case against the Individual Defendants 3s. (38. 4d.) Speeches of the Prosecutors at the Close of the Case against the Indicted Organisations 2s. 6d. (2s. 9d.) PRICES IN BRACKETS INCLUDE POSTAGE CONTINUED ON PAGE iii OF COVER LAW REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS Selected and prepared by THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION Volume VI , .... ,.s.~.' PROPERTY OF U. S. ARMY -}; THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S ?CI::!OO~ .~~~ LIBRARY___ ..... _,I _ ...... ,~.~~-~~~.. LONDON: PUBLISHED FOR THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1948 CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD BY THE RT. HON. THE LORD WRIGHT OF DURLEY . .. V THE CASES: 35. TRIAL -OF JOSEF ALTSTOTTER AND OT!lERS United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 17th February-4th December, 1947 I HEADING NOTES AND SUMMARY 1 A. OUTLINE OF THE PROCEEDINGS 2 1. THE COURT 2 2. THE CHARGES 2 3. A CHALLENGE TO THE SUFFICIENCY OF COUNT ONE OF THE INDICTMENT .. 5 4. THE EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL .
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Agency South Africa: a Year in Review
    ZIONIST ANNUAL REPORT DGNJSR The Jewish Agency South Africa: A Year in Review 2013 DGNJSR TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE ISRAEL CENTRE 2 GREETINGS 4-6 ISRAEL ENCOUNTER 2013 7 THE JEWISH AGENCY MISHLACHAT 8-9 (DELEGATION) TO SOUTH AFRICA 2013-14 THE ISRAEL QUIZ 2013 10 ZIONIST CARAVAN 11 ALIYAH2GETHER 12 HIGHER EDUCATION EXPO 13 ABOUT THE ISRAEL CENTRE The Israel Centre represents The Jewish Agency for Israel in South Africa. We are committed CYCALIVE 14 to strengthening the connection between the South African Jewish community and the PARTNERSHIP2GETHER ARTISTS DELEGATION 15 State of Israel, through various programmes and comprehensive Zionist Education. ALIYAH NOW EXPO 2013 16 Through Partnership2Gether, we are proud to join with the Beit Shemesh-Mateh Yehuda region in Israel and Washington DC to connect Jewish Communities in Israel and the PARTNERSHIP2GETHER COEXISTENCE SOCCER DELEGATION 17 Diaspora. ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENTS 18-19 Working closely with our Shlichim, we maintain vital ties with our Zionist Youth SAZF ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 20-23 Movements. JNF ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 24-25 The Israel Centre offers various educational programmes, including Israel Encounter and ABOUT THE SOUTH AFRICAN ZIONIST FEDERATION 26 Masa Israel Journey gap year, study abroad, post-college and volunteer programs in Israel. With over 200 unique programmes on offer, the Israel Centre does its best to match the ABOUT THE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL 26 most suitable programme to the individual. Through our Maoz Education Program, the Israel Centre works closely with the formal and informal Jewish education systems to create and maintain the vital bond between young Jews and Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • No. ICC-01/04-02/06 23 February 2017 Original
    ICC-01/04-02/06-1798 23-02-2017 1/38 NM T OA5 Original: English No.: ICC-01/04-02/06 Date: 23 February 2017 THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng, Presiding Judge Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert Judge Howard Morrison Judge Piotr Hofmański Judge Raul C. Pangalangan SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. BOSCO NTAGANDA Public Former Child Soldiers’ observations on the “Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9” Source: Office of Public Counsel for Victims (CLR1) No. ICC-01/04-02/06 1/38 23 February 2017 ICC-01/04-02/06-1798 23-02-2017 2/38 NM T OA5 Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Ms Fatou Bensouda Mr Stéphane Bourgon Mr James Stewart Mr Chris Gosnell Ms Helen Brady Ms Nicole Samson Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Ms Sarah Pellet Mr Mohamed Abdou Mr Dmytro Suprun Ms Anne Grabowski Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Counsel Support Section Mr Herman von Hebel Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section No. ICC-01/04-02/06 2/38 23 February 2017 ICC-01/04-02/06-1798 23-02-2017 3/38 NM T OA5 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Limits of Universal Jurisdiction
    The Legal Limits of Universal Jurisdiction ANTHONY J. COLANGELO* I. Introduction ............................................................................... 150 II. Universal Jurisdiction's Prescriptive-Adjudicative Symbiosis . 157 III. The Customary Law of Universal Jurisdiction .......................... 163 A. Adjudicative Versus Prescriptive Universal Jurisdiction ....................................................................... 163 B. "Conventional" Versus Customary Universal Jurisdiction ....................................................................... 166 C. Treaties and the Prescriptive Substance of Universal C rim es .............................................................................. 169 IV. Evolving and Enforcing the Limits of Universal Jurisdiction ... 182 V . C onclusion ................................................................................. 185 V I. A ppendix ................................................................................... 186 Despite all the attention it receives from both its supporters and crit- ics, universal jurisdiction remains one of the more confused doctrines of international law. Indeed, while commentary has focused largely and unevenly on policy and normative arguments either favoring or under- cutting the desirability of its exercise, a straightforward legal analysis breaking down critical aspects of this extraordinary form of jurisdiction remains conspicuously missing. Yet universal jurisdiction's increased practice by states calls out for such a clear descriptive
    [Show full text]
  • Murder by an Unprivileged Belligerent Is Not a War Crime
    THE UNILATERALUNILATERAL CREATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW DURINGDURING THE "WAR"WAR ONON TERROR": MURDER BY AN UNPRIVILEGEDUNPRIVILEGED BELLIGERENT IS NOT AA WARWAR CRIMECRIME Noman Goheer*Goheer* INTRODUCTION On July 4, 2006,just2006, just fivefive days days after after the the Supreme Supreme CourtCourt ruledruled in Hamdan v.v. Rumsfeld,'Rumsfeld,' prosecuting attorneysattorneys ProfessorProfessor NealNeal KatyalKatyal of Georgetown University Law Law Center Center and and LieutenantLieutenant CommanderCommander Charles Swift flewflew toto Guant~namoGuantanamo Bay,Bay, CubaCuba (Guantdnamo)(Guantanamo) to meet their client,client, Salim Hamdan, and tell him the Supreme Court declared the militarymilitary commissions hehe waswas to to be be tried tried underunder uncon- stitutional.2 WhileWhile explainingexplaining theirtheir seminalseminal victoryvictory to Hamdan,Hamdan, they said that "[i]"[i]n n 50 to 100100 years, law studentsstudents willwill bebe readingreading this case and reading your name."'name."3 HamdanHamdan respondedresponded that that " "[m]aybe[m] aybe I'll change my name.name. II just want to go home."'home."4 While Hamdan's resignationresignation isis understandableunderstandable consideringconsidering his five-year confinement confinement atat Guantnamo,Guantanamo, the legal communitycommunity be- lieved Katyal andand SwiftSwift did did thethe impossible.impossible.'5 TheyThey wonwon aa casecase strik-strik- ing downdown aa judicialjudicial systemsystem thatthat depriveddeprived itsits participantsparticipants ofof constitutional rights.6 In eighteight MilitaryMilitary Commissions Instructions (MCI(MCI No. 1-8), the Department ofof Defense (DOD) delineateddelineated procedures to guide the * J.D. CandidateCandidate (2008),(2008), WashingtonWashington CollegeCollege of of Law, Law, AmericanAmerican University;University; M.A.M.A. Candidate (2008),(2008), SchoolSchool of of International International Service Service — - AmericanAmerican University;University; B.A., Emory University, 2005.2005.
    [Show full text]
  • How the United States and Canada Violate International Law and Fail to Ensure the Prosecution of War Criminals
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 45 Issue 1 Article 16 2012 Somebody Else's Problem: How the United States and Canada Violate International Law and Fail to Ensure the Prosecution of War Criminals Nicholas P. Weiss Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Nicholas P. Weiss, Somebody Else's Problem: How the United States and Canada Violate International Law and Fail to Ensure the Prosecution of War Criminals, 45 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 579 (2012) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol45/iss1/16 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 45 Fall 2012 Issues 1 & 2 Somebody Else’s Problem: How the United States and Canada Violate International Law and Fail to Ensure the Prosecution of War Criminals Nicholas P. Weiss CASE WESTERN RESERVE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW·VOL. 45·2012 Somebody Else’s Problem: How the United States and Canada Violate International Law and Fail to Ensure the Prosecution of War Criminals Nicholas P. Weiss* The United States and Canada have created programs to ensure that they will not be havens for war criminals and human rights violators. This, however, fails to meet their international legal obligation to ensure that suspected war criminals and human rights violators will be prosecuted for their crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 August 2013 / 10 Elul 5773 Volume 17 – Number 29
    2 SA JEWISH REPORT News 01 - 08 June 2012 Tickets can be purchased from Beyachad email [email protected] or sms Karen at 074 841 0555 Friday 16 August 2013 / 10 Elul 5773 Volume 17 – Number 29 ISRAELI JAZZ ARTIST south african AT WITs – COMMUNITY URGED TO ATTEND (pAGe 3) Jewish Report www.sajewishreport.co.za Photo: Howard Sackstein Photo: Limmud rocks! Last weekend’s three-day Limmud Conference at Fourways, near Johannesburg, was a resounding success, filling the Indaba Hotel with musicians, scientists, Jewish tradition, spirituality and other topics. See our extensive coverage on pages 13 to 15. What Ambassador Ngombane UOS conference testifies to The making of the prestigious BOEKKOOI: Tribute concert Gaborone Jewry: Small in really told Jerusalem Post Union’s strong leadership Absa Jewish Achiever Awards does full justice to Zaidel- number, but rich in Torah Magazine Rudolph’s legacy presence “SA Jewry is unique worldwide: we An astounding amount of work and Jerusalem Post Magazine’s website have one Beth Din and one kashrut expertise is involved in making an As a whole it is perhaps one of Zaidel- Organised Jewish life in Botswana quotes Ambassador Ngombane out of department, reflective of the unity enterprise of the magnitude of the Rudolph’s richest outpourings of was launched in the early 1990s by context, effectively severely affecting we enjoy between the rabbonim and Absa Jewish Achiever Awards happen - something close to absolute music. the placing of an advertisement in the his standpoints. We cite the article more community members.” because it doesn’t just happen. local newspaper calling on all “minyan comprehensively.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 124, War Crimes, and the Development of the Rome Statute
    ARTICLE 124, WAR CRIMES, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROME STATUTE SHANA TABAK* The Rome Statute is the founding document of the International Criminal Court (ICC), a court created to prosecute, among other crimes, the most serious crimes of war. Article 124 of the Rome Statute, however, permits States Parties to refuse ICC jurisdiction over war crimes committed on their territory or by their own nationals for a period of up to seven years. Article 124, also known as the “transitional provision” or “opt-out provision,”1 reads: Notwithstanding article 12, paragraphs 1 and 2, a State, on becoming a party to this Statute, may declare that, for a period of seven years after the entry into force of this Statute for the State concerned, it does not accept the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the category of crimes referred to in article 8 when a crime is alleged to have been committed by its nationals or on its territory. A declaration under this article may be withdrawn at any time. The provisions of this article shall be reviewed at the Review Conference convened in accordance with article 123, paragraph 1.2 David Scheffer, who headed the U.S. delegation to the Rome Confer- ence to establish the ICC, called Article 124 the war crimes “opt-out,”3 a term which has gained traction among human rights advocates and critics of the article. Despite the trepidation expressed by critics of * J.D. Candidate, Georgetown University Law Center, 2009. Many thanks to Professor Julie O’Sullivan for her guidance and encouragement in developing an earlier version of this paper during her course in International Criminal Law.
    [Show full text]