DOCSLIB.ORG

Reopening Guidance Currently Available by State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Reopening Guidance Currently Available by State State Reopening Guidance Faith-Based Guidance Notes/Other Links Alabama Altogether Alabama Guidelines for Places of Worship Alaska Reopen Alaska Responsibly Phase III-IV Social, Religious, and Other Gatherings Stay Healthy. Return Smarter. Arizona Return Stronger. Guidance for Places of Worship Arkansas Department of Heath Guidance for Places of Worship Places of Worship Supporting Information Places of Worship and Providers of Religious Services California Resilence Roadmap and Cultural Ceremonies Colorado Safer at Home Guidance Guidance for Places of Worship Connecticut Reopen Connecticut Delaware Economic Reopening Guidance for Communities of Worship Faith, Arts, Culture, Hotels, Entertainment and District of Columbia ReOpenDC Sports Committee Recommendations Florida Plan for Florida's Recovery Georgia COVID-19 Guidance Hawaii Re-Opening and Recovery Plan Places of worship listed in the guidance. Idaho Idaho Rebounds Guidance Places of worship listed in the guidance. Illinois Restore Illinois Indiana Back on Track Indiana Revised Guidance for Places of Worship Iowa State of Iowa Angency Guidance Guidance for Spiritual and Religious Gathering Kansas A Plance to Reopen Kansas Guidance for the Condcut of Church Services… Health at Work Reopneing Kentucky Kentucky Guidance for Places of Worship Lousisiana Open Safely Phase 2 Phase 2 - Place of Worship Maine Restarting Maine's Economy Religious services mentioned in stage 1 Maryland Strong: Roadmap to Maryland Recovery Churches, Synagogues, and Other Places of Worship Places of Worship and Religious Services MA Safety Places of Worship and Religious Services MA Massachusetts Reopening Massachusetts Standards COVID-19 Checklist Michigan MI Safe Start Minnesota Stay Safe MN Community and Faith-Based Organizations Researched by the HHS Partnership Center Last Updated: 8/11/20201:39 PM [email protected] | 202-260-6501 3 Reopening Guidance Currently Available by State State Reopening Guidance Faith-Based Guidance Notes/Other Links Safe Worship: Guidelines for In-Person Worship Mississippi Safe Return Mississippi Services Missouri Show Me Strong Recovery Plan FAQ List places of worship Montana Reopening the Big Sky Phase 2 Nebraska Guidance Documents Guidelines for the Conduct of Faith Based Services… Nevada Roadmap to Recovery Event Organizers - Lists Fiath Leaders New Hampshire Stay at Home 2.0 Places of Worship New Jersey The Road Back Stage 2 In FAQ: Churches and other Houses of Worship New Mexico All Together New Mexico Faith-based FAQ New York NY Forward Interim Guidance for Places of Worship and Religious North Carolina Safe at Home: Phase 2 Services North Dakota ND Smart Restart Back to Church: Best Practices for Places of Worship Ohio Responsible Restart Ohio Oklahoma Open Up and Recover Safely Places of Worship Building a Safe and Strong Oregon Oregon Pennsylvania Process to Reopen Rhode Island Reopening RI Phase 2 Faith-Based Organizations South Carolina accelerate SC South Dakota Back to Normal Plan Considerations for Spiritual and Religious Gatherings Reopening Tennessee Guidance for Gathering Together in Houses of Tennessee Responsibly Worship Governor's Strike Force to Open Texas Texas Open Texas Checklist Churches Place of of Worship Utah Utah Leads Together 3.0 Religious Services Restart Vermont: Phased Re- Vermont openings Virginia Forward Virginia Guidelines FAQ: Religious Services Listed Researched by the HHS Partnership Center Last Updated: 8/11/20201:39 PM [email protected] | 202-260-6501 3 Reopening Guidance Currently Available by State State Reopening Guidance Faith-Based Guidance Notes/Other Links Phase 1 and 2 Religious and Faith-based Washington Safe Start Organization COVID-19 Requiremnts West Virginia Strong - The West Virginia Comback Guidance for Religious Entities and Funeral Homes Wisconsin Badger Bounce Back Community and Faith-Based Organizations Wyoming COVID-19 Orders and Guidance Researched by the HHS Partnership Center Last Updated: 8/11/20201:39 PM [email protected] | 202-260-6501 3.
Recommended publications
  • MI COVID Response Data and Modeling Update June 30, 2021

    MI COVID Response Data and Modeling Update June 30, 2021

    MI COVID response Data and modeling update June 30, 2021 NOTE: all data as of June 29 unless otherwise noted Draft and pre-decisional Note: lower national rankings are more favorable Executive summary Percent Positivity is steady, and Case Rate is down 27% since last week. Positivity (1.3%, ↔) and case rates 13.1, ↓3.9) have declined or plateaued for eleven weeks Michigan has the 33rd lowest number of cases (↑3), and 8th lowest case rate (↑5) in the last 7 days (source: CDC COVID Data Tracker) Percent of inpatient beds occupied by individuals with COVID has decreased 14% since last week and is decreasing for nine weeks. There are 1.7% (↓0.3%) inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients. Michigan has the 12th lowest inpatient bed utilization (↑13), and the 14th lowest adult ICU bed utilization (↑9) in the country (source: US HHS Protect) Deaths have decreased 40% since last week. There were 65 COVID deaths between Jun 16 and June 22, and the Death Rate is 0.9 deaths per million residents (↓0.4) Michigan has the 6th highest number of deaths (↔), and 10th highest death rate (↓2) in the last 7 days (source: CDC COVID Data Tracker) The 7-day average state testing rate has decreased to 1,255.3 tests/million/day. Daily diagnostic tests (PCR) is 12.4K per day, and the weekly average for PCR and antigen tests conducted in Michigan is 24.9K. 9.4 million COVID-19 vaccine doses reported to CDC, 4.693 million people have completed their vaccine series 2 Agenda Status of COVID-19 Epidemiological Risk State-by-state comparison of epidemic spread Michigan epidemic spread Public health response Science round-up 3 Global and National Comparisons What we see today (data through 6/29): • Globally, 181,533,728 cases and 3,932,077 deaths • Countries with the highest number of cases are U.S.
  • Florida, California and Texas Dominate Future Population Growth, While Michigan's Slow Growth Moves It out of the Top 10 Three

    Florida, California and Texas Dominate Future Population Growth, While Michigan's Slow Growth Moves It out of the Top 10 Three

    Florida, California and Texas Dominate Future Population Growth, While Michigan’s Slow Growth Moves It Out of the Top 10 Three states — Florida, California and Texas — are projected to account for nearly one- half (46 percent) of the total U.S. population growth of 82 million persons between 2000 and 2030, according to Census Bureau state population projections released today. Florida, now the fourth most populous state, would edge past New York into third place in total population by 2011; California and Texas would continue to rank first and second, respectively, in 2030. Rounding out the top 5 gainers are Arizona and North Carolina. Top five fastest-growing states between 2000 and 2030 would be Nevada (114 percent), Arizona (109 percent), Florida (80 percent), Texas (60 percent) and Utah (56 percent). Only West Virginia, North Dakota and the District of Columbia are projected to lose population over this period. (See Table 1) Michigan is projected to gain 755,728 residents over the 30-year period. This increase places it 21st among the 50 States and District of Columbia. The 7.6 percent population increase that this represents ranks 40th. Further analysis of Michigan’s projections shows that the Census Bureau expects a slowing of growth over the 30-year period, culminating in losses between 2025 and 20301. The 5-year population change rates projected for Michigan, starting with 2000-2005 are: 2.7%; 2.2%; 1.6%; 0.9%; 0.2%; and –0.2%. The results of these changes on Michigan’s ranking among the States are shown in Table 2.
  • The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706

    The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706

    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 41 Number 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 41, Article 7 Issue 1 1962 The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706 Charles W. Arnade Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Arnade, Charles W. (1962) "The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 41 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol41/iss1/7 Arnade: The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706 THE ENGLISH INVASION OF SPANISH FLORIDA, 1700-1706 by CHARLES W. ARNADE HOUGH FLORIDA had been discovered by Ponce de Leon in T 1513, not until 1565 did it become a Spanish province in fact. In that year Pedro Menendez de Aviles was able to establish a permanent capital which he called St. Augustine. Menendez and successive executives had plans to make St. Augustine a thriving metropolis ruling over a vast Spanish colony that might possibly be elevated to a viceroyalty. Nothing of this sort happened. By 1599 Florida was in desperate straits: Indians had rebelled and butchered the Franciscan missionaries, fire and flood had made life in St. Augustine miserable, English pirates of such fame as Drake had ransacked the town, local jealousies made life unpleasant.
  • County Government in Mississippi Fifth Edition

    County Government in Mississippi Fifth Edition

    County Government in Mississippi FIFTH EDITION County Government in Mississippi Fifth Edition Sumner Davis and Janet P. Baird, Editors Contributors Michael T. Allen Roberto Gallardo Kenneth M. Murphree Janet Baird Heath Hillman James L. Roberts, Jr. Tim Barnard Tom Hood Jonathan M. Shook David Brinton Samuel W. Keyes, Jr. W. Edward Smith Michael Caples Michael Keys Derrick Surrette Brad Davis Michael Lanford H. Carey Webb Sumner Davis Frank McCain Randall B. Wall Gary E. Friedman Jerry L. Mills Joe B. Young Judy Mooney With forewords by Gary Jackson, PhD, and Derrick Surrette © 2015 Center for Government & Community Development Mississippi State University Extension Service Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 © 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transcribed, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the Center for Government & Community Development, Mississippi State University Extension Service. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the organization and operation of county government in Mississippi. It is distributed with the understanding that the editors, the individual authors, and the Center for Government & Community Development in the Mississippi State University Extension Service are not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required by the readers, the services of the Office of the Attorney General of Mississippi, the Office of the State Auditor of Mississippi, a county attorney, or some other competent professional should be sought. FOREWORD FROM THE MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE The Mississippi State University Extension Service is a vital, unbiased, research-based, client- driven organization.
  • COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT / MAMEY SAPOTE NICOLE "NIKKI" FRIED COMMISSIONER Section 581.031(26), F.S

    COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT / MAMEY SAPOTE NICOLE "NIKKI" FRIED COMMISSIONER Section 581.031(26), F.S

    Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT / MAMEY SAPOTE NICOLE "NIKKI" FRIED COMMISSIONER Section 581.031(26), F.S. 1911 S.W. 34th Street/P. O. Box 147100, Gainesville, FL 32608 / (352) 395-4700 1. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF PERSON OR FIRM 2. LOCATION 3. REGULATED ARTICLE(S): Fruit of mamey sapote (Pouteria sapota) 4. APPLICABLE STATE QUARANTINE(S) OR REGULATIONS: California Caribbean fruit fly exterior quarantine CCR3252 I / we agree to handle, pack, process, and move regulated articles in accordance with applicable plant quarantines; use all permits and certificates in accordance with instructions; maintain and offer for inspection such records as may be required; and abide by the following stipulations: In order to ensure compliance with California’s Caribbean fruit fly exterior quarantine (CCR 3252), the following conditions will be adhered to: 1. All mamey fruit (Pouteria sapota) shipped to California will be obtained from Florida producers, inspected for pests by the shipper, certified as Florida grown by the department, and then packed and shipped in new boxes from Florida. 2. There will be no co-mingling with mamey fruit (Pouteria sapota) not of Florida origin, or any other fruit of any kind not certified for shipment to California. All mamey fruit destined for California will be kept safeguarded from pests while in Florida storage and during shipment. 3. Each shipment will be accompanied by a tag or stamp imprint authorized by the department signifying that the fruit is Florida grown (i.e., was harvested solely from trees producing in Florida). 4.
  • State Abbreviations

    State Abbreviations

    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
  • Llttroduction the Section of Louisiana

    Llttroduction the Section of Louisiana

    area between the two northe111 boundaries \llhich the English had established was in dispute between the new United States and Spain, who again owned the rest of llTTRODUCTION Flo~ida - both East and West - as a result of the lat­ est Treaty of Paris. This dispute continued until 1798, when the United States waS finally put in The section of Louisiana known today as the pos~ession of the area to the thirty-first parallel "Florida Parishes" -- consisting of the eight (the lower boundary line), which waS re-established parishes of East and West Feliciana, East Baton Rouge, as the northern boundar,y of West Florida. st. Helena, Livingston, Tangipahoa, Washington, and When the United States purchased from France in St. Tammany -- was included in the area known as the 1803 the real estate west of the Mississippi River province of I1Louisiana" claimed by France until 1763· kno"m as the "Louisiana Purchase," the United States Under the terms of the Treaty of Paris which in that mad~ feeble claims on the area of West Florida re­ year ended the Seven Years War, or the French and maining to Spain. Indian Wax, this territory became English along with Meantime, several abortive attempts at all the territory east of the Mississippi River ex­ reb~llion against Spain were made within the area. cept the Isle of Orleans*. Even the Spanish province On 23 September 1810 a successful armed revolt of "Florida" (approximately the present state of OCC1.trred, and for a short time the "Republic of Florida) became English at that time.
  • List of Surrounding States *For Those Chapters That Are Made up of More Than One State We Will Submit Education to the States and Surround States of the Chapter

    List of Surrounding States *For Those Chapters That Are Made up of More Than One State We Will Submit Education to the States and Surround States of the Chapter

    List of Surrounding States *For those Chapters that are made up of more than one state we will submit education to the states and surround states of the Chapter. Hawaii accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Virginia will accept Continuing Education hours without prior approval. All Qualifying Education must be approved by them. Offering In Will submit to Alaska Alabama Florida Georgia Mississippi South Carolina Texas Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Missouri Mississippi Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Nevada Utah California Arizona Nevada Oregon Colorado Arizona Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah Wyoming Connecticut Massachusetts New Jersey New York Rhode Island District of Columbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida Alabama Georgia Georgia Alabama Florida North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Hawaii Iowa Illinois Missouri Minnesota Nebraska South Dakota Wisconsin Idaho Montana Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Illinois Illinois Indiana Kentucky Michigan Missouri Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Kentucky Michigan Ohio Wisconsin Kansas Colorado Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Kentucky Illinois Indiana Missouri Ohio Tennessee Virginia West Virginia Louisiana Arkansas Mississippi Texas Massachusetts Connecticut Maine New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Vermont Maryland Delaware District of Columbia
  • Data Driven Decision-Making in South Dakota

    Data Driven Decision-Making in South Dakota

    DATA DRIVEN DECISION-MAKING IN SOUTH DAKOTA EFFECTIVE USE OF STATE DATA SYSTEMS JOHN ARMSTRONG SD This paper is based on research funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. © 2016 by the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association (SHEEO) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 THE IMPORTANCE OF DATA FOR THE EXECUTIVE .............................................................................. 4 THE IMPETUS FOR SDBOR DASHBOARDS ........................................................................................... 6 REACTIONS TO SDBOR DASHBOARDS ................................................................................................11 DISPELLING MYTHS WITH DATA ......................................................................................................... 12 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................... 13 © 2016 by the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association (SHEEO) 3 INTRODUCTION Analysis of student-level data to inform policy and promote student success is a core function of executive higher education agencies. Postsecondary data systems have expanded their collection of data elements
  • South Dakota

    South Dakota

    Child & Family Research Partnership The University of Texas at Austin LBJ School of Public Affairs STATE-SPECIFIC SOURCES – SOUTH DAKOTA To provide states with guidance for building a strong prenatal-to-3 (PN-3) system of care, we sought to understand the progress states have made toward implementing each of the effective policies and strategies identified in the Prenatal-to-3 State Policy Roadmap. Policy adoption and implementation do not typically happen quickly. States may introduce legislation several times before adopting a policy and take even more time to fully implement it. States in which there has been considerable legislative initiative have made greater progress toward and are likely closer to adopting and implementing a policy compared to states in which there has been little to no legislative initiative. Once a policy is adopted, some states make the benefits more generous over time, whereas other states may rescind benefits in bills during subsequent legislative sessions. In the Roadmap, policies are defined as having been studied at the state level, and the evidence points to clear legislative or regulatory action that states can take to implement the policy and achieve better outcomes. Comprehensive reviews of rigorous evidence informed the definition for each of the five effective policies, including the level of generosity necessary to achieve outcomes for children and families. In contrast to policies, we define state-level strategies as effective programs or approaches that states have implemented, but research has not evaluated the strategy as a statewide policy, and research does not provide clear guidance on how states should implement the strategy statewide to replicate the impacts that were found in rigorous studies.
  • MAY 2019 FREE GUIDE Memorial Day

    MAY 2019 FREE GUIDE Memorial Day

    MAY 2019 FREE GUIDE Memorial Day WE WILL MATCH ANY REPUTABLE REALTOR’S COMMISSION STRUCTURE OF REAL ESTATE AGENTS TOP 1% IN THE COUNTRY Your home may be worth WAY more than you think! Call Jeff at 561.440.4003 2 easy ways to get your home value Text “TTValues” to 59559 or visit www.HomeValuePalmBeach.com YOUR LOCAL REAL ESTATE experts and neighbors CONTACT US TODAY TO HAVE YOUR HOME ADVERTISED IN OUR NEXT EDITION CLIENT TESTIMONIALS We had a choice of three SunFest top agents to list our home with. We choose Jeff and his team. We were not disappointed MAY 2ND - 5TH | WEST PALM BEACH with the out come. We had multiple showings and received an offer within 13 days of our home being Florida’s largest waterfront music and art listed. Jeff took care of everything. You will be festival, SunFest, has taken place every happy using Jeff and his year since 1982. So why not come out to team. see what keeps this fun and entertaining - C Plummer festival alive year after year? The festival provides guests with five days of music and entertainment with more than 175,000 people in attendance each Jeff and his entire team year! are professional and very committed to a job well done. They get top dollar Check out the official website for more for your home and have information on tickets, schedules, event an extensive advertising details and more! program. I would highly recommend their services. It’s understandable why they are the top agency - Jacki Warren www.sunfest.com 2 easy ways to get your home value Text “TTValues” to 59559 or visit www.HomeValuePalmBeach.com 7180 KEY LARGO WAY 2160 ALWORTH TERRACE 3389 LAGO DE TALAVERA 3390 ARTESIAN DRIVE Beautifully remodeled home with impact glass, Gorgeous lakefront, estate home situated on an Gorgeous, estate home in exclusive Wellington Completely updated home situated on a great new kitchen and bathrooms expansive corner lot.
  • Florida-Alabama Tpo Mobility Profile

    Florida-Alabama Tpo Mobility Profile

    FLORIDA-ALABAMA TPO MOBILITY PROFILE produced by Florida Department of Transportation Forecasting and Trends Office published 2021 % Pedestrian Facility Average Coverage in Urban Areas Job Accessibility Forecasting Florida-Alabama by Automobile & Trends Office TPO Mobility Profile - 2019 Within 135.5 30 Minutes (thousands) Planning 1.73 Time 1.18 1.18 41.3% Index 94% 92% % Bicycle Average 94% Facility Coverage Job Accessibility by Transit On-Time Within Arrival 30 Minutes 3.0 (thousands) FREEWAYS NON-FREEWAY STRATEGIC 45.6% ( INTERSTATE) INTERMODAL SYSTEM Travel Time Reliability Daily Vehicle Percent Miles Daily Truck Miles Traveled Hours of Delay Heavily Congested Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled 4,500 NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0.5M <1% 6.1M STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM 9,000 STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0.6M <1% 8.7M FREEWAYS 300 0.3M FREEWAYS <1% 2.4M NON-FREEWAYS 8,700 <1% 3.2M NON-FREEWAYS 6.2M NOTE: Please go to Page 3 for measure definitions. 1 FLORIDA-ALABAMA TPO MOBILITY TRENDS 2015-2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Travel Time Reliability 1.73 1.19 1.20 1.23 1.18 1.56 1.19 1.20 1.23 1.18 Planning 1.16 1.34 1.40 1.45 1.16 Time Index On-Time Arrival 93% 92% 90% 89% 94% >99% 98% 96% 94% 92% 93% 92% 90% 89% 94% INTERSTATE NON-FREEWAY STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM FREEWAYS Daily Vehicle Percent Miles Daily Truck Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay Heavily Congested Miles Traveled Miles Traveled NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM FREEWAYS NATIONAL <1% 549.2K 6.1M HIGHWAY SYSTEM 7% 511.7K 6.0M 4,500 300 4% 454.2K 5.6M 3,600 <100 2% 450.0K 5.6M 433.0K 5.5M