DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida-Alabama Tpo Mobility Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida-Alabama Tpo Mobility Profile FLORIDA-ALABAMA TPO MOBILITY PROFILE produced by Florida Department of Transportation Forecasting and Trends Office published 2021 % Pedestrian Facility Average Coverage in Urban Areas Job Accessibility Forecasting Florida-Alabama by Automobile & Trends Office TPO Mobility Profile - 2019 Within 135.5 30 Minutes (thousands) Planning 1.73 Time 1.18 1.18 41.3% Index 94% 92% % Bicycle Average 94% Facility Coverage Job Accessibility by Transit On-Time Within Arrival 30 Minutes 3.0 (thousands) FREEWAYS NON-FREEWAY STRATEGIC 45.6% ( INTERSTATE) INTERMODAL SYSTEM Travel Time Reliability Daily Vehicle Percent Miles Daily Truck Miles Traveled Hours of Delay Heavily Congested Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled 4,500 NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0.5M <1% 6.1M STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM 9,000 STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0.6M <1% 8.7M FREEWAYS 300 0.3M FREEWAYS <1% 2.4M NON-FREEWAYS 8,700 <1% 3.2M NON-FREEWAYS 6.2M NOTE: Please go to Page 3 for measure definitions. 1 FLORIDA-ALABAMA TPO MOBILITY TRENDS 2015-2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Travel Time Reliability 1.73 1.19 1.20 1.23 1.18 1.56 1.19 1.20 1.23 1.18 Planning 1.16 1.34 1.40 1.45 1.16 Time Index On-Time Arrival 93% 92% 90% 89% 94% >99% 98% 96% 94% 92% 93% 92% 90% 89% 94% INTERSTATE NON-FREEWAY STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM FREEWAYS Daily Vehicle Percent Miles Daily Truck Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay Heavily Congested Miles Traveled Miles Traveled NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM FREEWAYS NATIONAL <1% 549.2K 6.1M HIGHWAY SYSTEM 7% 511.7K 6.0M 4,500 300 4% 454.2K 5.6M 3,600 <100 2% 450.0K 5.6M 433.0K 5.5M 4,500 <100 1% 4,400 1,500 STATE <1% 692.4K 8.7M HIGHWAY 3,000 1,200 SYSTEM 2% 637.0K 8.1M 3% 570.0K 8.0M 1% 560.0K 7.9M STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM NON-FREEWAYS 1% 537.8K 7.5M 9,000 8,700 FREEWAYS <1% 366.6K 2.4M <1% 326.6K 2.2M 7,200 7,100 <1% 290.0K 2.1M 7,900 7,800 <1% 280.0K 2.1M 7,300 5,900 <1% 275.2K 2.0M 5,400 4,200 NON-FREEWAYS <1% 325.8K 6.2M 3% 310.4K 5.9M 3% 280.0K 5.9M 2% 270.0K 5.8M <1% 262.7K 5.6M 2 DEFINITIONS Travel Time Reliability: Average Job Accessibility by Automobile: The number of jobs accessible within a 30-minute automobile trip for each MPO. The Accessibility Planning Time Index: The 95th percentile travel time divided by Observatory at the University of Minnesota calculated accessibility at the Census free flow travel time. A planning time index of 1.5 means a 20-minute block level by measuring the travel time from each block to the neighboring trip at free flow speed takes 30 minutes - an informed traveler should blocks, then summing the total number of jobs that can be accessed within a plan for the extra 10 minutes to arrive on time. For this reporting, the 30-minute time period. Visit the FDOT Accessibility page for more details. measure is captured in the peak hour, which is from 5 to 6 pm. Average Job Accessibility by Transit: The number of jobs The percentage of freeway trips traveling at Vehicle On-Time Arrival: accessible within a 30-minute transit trip for each MPO. The Accessibility greater than or equal to five mph below the posted speed limit. In the urbanized Observatory at the University of Minnesota calculated accessibility at the Census areas of the seven largest MPOs, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage block level by measuring the travel time from each block to the neighboring of freeway trips traveling at least 45 mph. For arterials, travel time reliability is blocks, then summing the total number of jobs that can be accessed within a defined as the percentage of trips traveling greater than or equal to 20 mph. For 30-minute time period. Visit the FDOT Accessibility page for more details. this reporting, the measure is captured in the peak hour, which is from 5 to 6 pm. Three roadway systems are reported: National Highway System Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay: Delay is the product of directional (NHS), State Highway System (SHS), and Strategic Intermodal System (SIS). hourly volume and the difference between travel time at “threshold” speeds and travel time at the average speed. The thresholds are based on Level of Service (LOS) B as defined by FDOT. For the definitions of LOS B, please refer to 20202019 Source Book Methodology publication for more details. SHS Percent Miles Heavily Congested: Arterial segments operating at LOS NHS SIS E or worse in urbanized areas and D or worse in non-urbanized areas; highways operating at LOS E or worse; and freeways operating at 45 mph or worse. For more NHS SIS calculations details, please refer to 20202019 Source Book Methodology publication. can can Daily Truck Miles Traveled: (for all trucks class 4 through 13): The have SHS have total number of miles traveled daily by trucks using a roadway system. For truck both can both classifications, please refer to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) classification. have both SHS SHS NHS Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled: The product of a road’s length and its AADT. and and If a 10-mile-long road has an AADT of 5,000 vehicles, then its daily VMT is 50,000. SIS and NHS roads SIS roads Percentage of Pedestrian Facilities: The percentage of roads pedestrian facilities and shared path coverage along the SHS within the metropolitan planning organization’s (MPO’s) urbanized area. Percentage of Bicycle Facilities: The percentage of bicycle facilities and shared path coverage along the SHS within the MPO’s boundary, the MPO’s urbanized area, and within the county boundary (or county boundaries if more than one county) that the MPO is comprised of. Sources FDOT Traffic Characteristics Inventory, FDOT Roadway Characteristics Inventory, 2020 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, and HERE vehicle probe speed. 3 FDOT Supplied MPO Mobility Performance Measure Analyses for 2019 (Florida-Alabama TPO) 1 2 Florida-Alabama (TPO Boundary) AnnualAnnual Measures 1 RotatingRotating Measures 2 I: Average Job J: Average Job A: Daily Vehicle B: Daily Truck E: Daily Vehicle C: On-Time Arrival D: Planning Time F: Percent Miles G: % Pedestrian H: % Bicycle Accessibility by Accessibility by Networks/Measures Miles Traveled Miles Traveled Hours of Delay (Vehicle)3 Index3 Heavily Congested Facility Coverage Facility Coverage Automobile Transit (Millions) (Thousands) (Thousands) (Thousands)3 (Thousands)3 A: National Highway System 6.1 549.2 4.5 <1% B. State Highway System 8.7 692.4 9.0 <1% 4 C: Strategic Intermodal System 4.7 507.9 92% 1.73 2.0 <1% 135.5 3.0 D. Freeways 2.4 366.6 94% 1.181.23 0.3 <1% E. Interstates 2.5 368.7 94% 1.18 0.3 <1% F: Non-freeways (SHS) 6.2 325.8 8.7 30% 41% 46% Florida-Alabama (Urbanized Area Boundary) I: Average Job J: Average Job A: Daily Vehicle B: Daily Truck E: Daily Vehicle C: On-Time Arrival D: Planning Time F: Percent Miles G: % Pedestrian H: % Bicycle Accessibility by Accessibility by Networks/Measures Miles Traveled Miles Traveled Hours of Delay (Vehicle)3 Index3 Heavily Congested Facility Coverage Facility Coverage Automobile Transit (Millions) (Thousands) (Thousands) (Thousands)3 (Thousands)3 A: National Highway System 5.6 439.6 4.5 <1% B. State Highway System 7.9 550.9 8.9 <1% 4 C: Strategic Intermodal System 4.1 383.5 92% 1.74 2.0 <1% D. Freeways 2.0 260.1 93% 1.2 0.3 <1% E. Interstates 2.0 262.1 93% 1.2 0.3 <1% F: Non-freeways (SHS) 5.9 290.9 8.6 <1% 41% 48% Escambia,Escambia, SantaSanta Rosa Rosa, (County Baldwin Boundary) (County Boundary) I: Average Job J: Average Job A: Daily Vehicle B: Daily Truck E: Daily Vehicle C: On-Time Arrival D: Planning Time F: Percent Miles G: % Pedestrian H: % Bicycle Accessibility by Accessibility by Networks/Measures Miles Traveled Miles Traveled Hours of Delay (Vehicle)3 Index3 Heavily Congested Facility Coverage Facility Coverage Automobile Transit (Millions) (Thousands) (Thousands) (Thousands)3 (Thousands)3 A: National Highway System 6.3 580.6 4.5 <1% B. State Highway System 9.0 752.3 9.0 <1% 4 C: Strategic Intermodal System 4.9 539.3 91% 1.54 2.0 <1% 124.3 2.4 D. Freeways 2.4 366.6 84% 1.18 0.3 <1% E. Interstates 2.5 368.7 94% 1.18 0.3 <1% F: Non-freeways (SHS) 6.6 385.7 8.7 <1% 40% 32% 1. These six Annual Measures are reported each year. 2. These four Rotating Measures change every other year. Odd year measures consist of 1) Percent Sidewalk Coverage, 2) Percent Bicycle Lane Coverage, and 3) Average Job Accessibility within a 30-minute car trip and 4) within a 30-minute transit trip. 3. Measures C and D are captured in the peak hour, which is from 5 to 6 pm. 4. SIS On-Time Arrival and Planning Time Index exclude freeways 4 Annual MPO Performance Measures by MPO Population Size Florida Department of Transportation Mobility Measures Program provides valuable information on 2019 performance measures for all 27 MPOs in Florida. On an annual basis the MPOs receive reports on ten Florida-Alabama measures, six measures annually and four rotating measures biennially for the entire MPO boundary, urbanized area within the MPO, and for counties within the MPO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Florida, California and Texas Dominate Future Population Growth, While Michigan's Slow Growth Moves It out of the Top 10 Three
    Florida, California and Texas Dominate Future Population Growth, While Michigan’s Slow Growth Moves It Out of the Top 10 Three states — Florida, California and Texas — are projected to account for nearly one- half (46 percent) of the total U.S. population growth of 82 million persons between 2000 and 2030, according to Census Bureau state population projections released today. Florida, now the fourth most populous state, would edge past New York into third place in total population by 2011; California and Texas would continue to rank first and second, respectively, in 2030. Rounding out the top 5 gainers are Arizona and North Carolina. Top five fastest-growing states between 2000 and 2030 would be Nevada (114 percent), Arizona (109 percent), Florida (80 percent), Texas (60 percent) and Utah (56 percent). Only West Virginia, North Dakota and the District of Columbia are projected to lose population over this period. (See Table 1) Michigan is projected to gain 755,728 residents over the 30-year period. This increase places it 21st among the 50 States and District of Columbia. The 7.6 percent population increase that this represents ranks 40th. Further analysis of Michigan’s projections shows that the Census Bureau expects a slowing of growth over the 30-year period, culminating in losses between 2025 and 20301. The 5-year population change rates projected for Michigan, starting with 2000-2005 are: 2.7%; 2.2%; 1.6%; 0.9%; 0.2%; and –0.2%. The results of these changes on Michigan’s ranking among the States are shown in Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 41 Number 1 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 41, Article 7 Issue 1 1962 The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706 Charles W. Arnade Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Arnade, Charles W. (1962) "The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 41 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol41/iss1/7 Arnade: The English Invasion of Spanish Florida, 1700-1706 THE ENGLISH INVASION OF SPANISH FLORIDA, 1700-1706 by CHARLES W. ARNADE HOUGH FLORIDA had been discovered by Ponce de Leon in T 1513, not until 1565 did it become a Spanish province in fact. In that year Pedro Menendez de Aviles was able to establish a permanent capital which he called St. Augustine. Menendez and successive executives had plans to make St. Augustine a thriving metropolis ruling over a vast Spanish colony that might possibly be elevated to a viceroyalty. Nothing of this sort happened. By 1599 Florida was in desperate straits: Indians had rebelled and butchered the Franciscan missionaries, fire and flood had made life in St. Augustine miserable, English pirates of such fame as Drake had ransacked the town, local jealousies made life unpleasant.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT / MAMEY SAPOTE NICOLE "NIKKI" FRIED COMMISSIONER Section 581.031(26), F.S
    Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT / MAMEY SAPOTE NICOLE "NIKKI" FRIED COMMISSIONER Section 581.031(26), F.S. 1911 S.W. 34th Street/P. O. Box 147100, Gainesville, FL 32608 / (352) 395-4700 1. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF PERSON OR FIRM 2. LOCATION 3. REGULATED ARTICLE(S): Fruit of mamey sapote (Pouteria sapota) 4. APPLICABLE STATE QUARANTINE(S) OR REGULATIONS: California Caribbean fruit fly exterior quarantine CCR3252 I / we agree to handle, pack, process, and move regulated articles in accordance with applicable plant quarantines; use all permits and certificates in accordance with instructions; maintain and offer for inspection such records as may be required; and abide by the following stipulations: In order to ensure compliance with California’s Caribbean fruit fly exterior quarantine (CCR 3252), the following conditions will be adhered to: 1. All mamey fruit (Pouteria sapota) shipped to California will be obtained from Florida producers, inspected for pests by the shipper, certified as Florida grown by the department, and then packed and shipped in new boxes from Florida. 2. There will be no co-mingling with mamey fruit (Pouteria sapota) not of Florida origin, or any other fruit of any kind not certified for shipment to California. All mamey fruit destined for California will be kept safeguarded from pests while in Florida storage and during shipment. 3. Each shipment will be accompanied by a tag or stamp imprint authorized by the department signifying that the fruit is Florida grown (i.e., was harvested solely from trees producing in Florida). 4.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Detention in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, and the COVID-19 Pandemic
    WEBINAR Immigrant Detention in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, and the COVID-19 Pandemic May 6, 2020 2:30pm – 4pm EDT 1:30pm – 3pm CDT Featured Speakers DONALD KERWIN Executive Director Center for Migration Studies HIROKO KUSUDA Clinic Professor and Director of the Immigration Law Section Loyola University New Orleans College of Law AMELIA S. MCGOWAN Immigration Campaign Director Mississippi Center for Justice Adjunct Professor Mississippi College School of Law Immigration Clinic MARK DOW Author of American Gulag: Inside US Immigration Prisons US Immigrant Detention System ● Genesis of Webinar: A Whole of Community Response to Challenges Facing Immigrants, their Families, and Communities in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama ● The US Immigrant Detention System: Size, Growth, “Civil” Detention Population, Privatization, and Diversity of Institutional Actors ● Immigrant detainees v. persons serving time. ● Louisiana has always been one of the states with the most immigrant detainees. ICE Detention Facility Locator: https://www.ice.gov/detention-facilities COVID-19 and US Immigrant Detention System ● “Confirmed” COVID-19 Cases: (1) March 27 (no “confirmed” cases among detainees), (2) April 20 (124 confirmed cases), (3) May 4 (606 confirmed cases in 37 facilities, and 39 cases among ICE detention staff). Source: https://www.ice.gov/coronavirus ● These figures do not count: (1) former detainees who have been deported, (2) ICE contractors (private, state and local, and others); and (3) non-ICE prisoners/detainees held with ICE detainees. ● ICE detention population: March 21 (38,058), April 25 (29,675). ● Social distancing is “nearly impossible in immigration detention.” As a result, ICE should “implement community-based alternatives to detention to alleviate the mass overcrowding in detention facilities.” Open letter to ICE Acting Director Matthew T.
    [Show full text]
  • SMEX03 ENVISAT ASAR Data, Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, Version 1 USER GUIDE
    SMEX03 ENVISAT ASAR Data, Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, Version 1 USER GUIDE How to Cite These Data As a condition of using these data, you must include a citation: Jackson, T., R. Bindlish, and R. Van der Velde. 2009. SMEX03 ENVISAT ASAR Data, Alabama, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/7ZGTHVZFAIDT. [Date Accessed]. Jackson, T., R. Bindlish, and R. Van der Velde. 2013. SMEX03 ENVISAT ASAR Data, Georgia, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/M28ZA9EYPHQ5. [Date Accessed]. Jackson, T., R. Bindlish, and R. Van der Velde. 2013. SMEX03 ENVISAT ASAR Data, Oklahoma, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/YXYV5M9B6I1J. [Date Accessed]. FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE DATA, CONTACT [email protected] FOR CURRENT INFORMATION, VISIT https://nsidc.org/data/NSIDC-0357, https://nsidc.org/data/NSIDC-0576, https://nsidc.org/data/NSIDC-0577 USER GUIDE: SMEX03 ENVISAT ASAR Data, Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, Version 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DETAILED DATA DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2 1.1 Format ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Llttroduction the Section of Louisiana
    area between the two northe111 boundaries \llhich the English had established was in dispute between the new United States and Spain, who again owned the rest of llTTRODUCTION Flo~ida - both East and West - as a result of the lat­ est Treaty of Paris. This dispute continued until 1798, when the United States waS finally put in The section of Louisiana known today as the pos~ession of the area to the thirty-first parallel "Florida Parishes" -- consisting of the eight (the lower boundary line), which waS re-established parishes of East and West Feliciana, East Baton Rouge, as the northern boundar,y of West Florida. st. Helena, Livingston, Tangipahoa, Washington, and When the United States purchased from France in St. Tammany -- was included in the area known as the 1803 the real estate west of the Mississippi River province of I1Louisiana" claimed by France until 1763· kno"m as the "Louisiana Purchase," the United States Under the terms of the Treaty of Paris which in that mad~ feeble claims on the area of West Florida re­ year ended the Seven Years War, or the French and maining to Spain. Indian Wax, this territory became English along with Meantime, several abortive attempts at all the territory east of the Mississippi River ex­ reb~llion against Spain were made within the area. cept the Isle of Orleans*. Even the Spanish province On 23 September 1810 a successful armed revolt of "Florida" (approximately the present state of OCC1.trred, and for a short time the "Republic of Florida) became English at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Surrounding States *For Those Chapters That Are Made up of More Than One State We Will Submit Education to the States and Surround States of the Chapter
    List of Surrounding States *For those Chapters that are made up of more than one state we will submit education to the states and surround states of the Chapter. Hawaii accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Virginia will accept Continuing Education hours without prior approval. All Qualifying Education must be approved by them. Offering In Will submit to Alaska Alabama Florida Georgia Mississippi South Carolina Texas Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Missouri Mississippi Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Nevada Utah California Arizona Nevada Oregon Colorado Arizona Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah Wyoming Connecticut Massachusetts New Jersey New York Rhode Island District of Columbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida Alabama Georgia Georgia Alabama Florida North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Hawaii Iowa Illinois Missouri Minnesota Nebraska South Dakota Wisconsin Idaho Montana Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Illinois Illinois Indiana Kentucky Michigan Missouri Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Kentucky Michigan Ohio Wisconsin Kansas Colorado Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Kentucky Illinois Indiana Missouri Ohio Tennessee Virginia West Virginia Louisiana Arkansas Mississippi Texas Massachusetts Connecticut Maine New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Vermont Maryland Delaware District of Columbia
    [Show full text]
  • Take the Lead, Alabama
    Take the Lead, Alabama Our children deserve the Too many high school graduates in Alabama best schools possible. are not prepared for college. That’s not happening today. Alabama is at the bottom of just about every education ranking being • Alabama students ranked No. 45 in College Readiness (U.S. News). published today, and that is hobbling our young people in a time when jobs require more education and • Only 18 percent of Alabama high school seniors are ready in all four ACT core subjects (PARCA). skill than ever before. • Nearly 30 percent of college freshmen in Alabama need remedial classes (PARCA). Ranking after ranking shows that Alabama is failing its school children. The leadership structure for Alabama schools just isn’t getting the job done for our schoolchildren. U.S. News & World Report (2019) • Alabama ranked No. 50 – dead last – in the publication’s latest education rankings. • Alabama is one of only six states with an elected school board that appoints a superintendent. • In Pre-K-12, Alabama ranked No. 49, ahead of only New Mexico. • States such as Florida and Virginia that earn top education rankings in study after study all have • Alabama students ranked next to last for math scores. Governor-appointed school boards. • All neighboring states have Governor-appointed boards. Education Week’s “Quality Counts” analysis (2018) • Alabama ranked 43rd among the states, with a C-minus grade. Here’s how the ‘Take the Lead’ initiative will improve • In the “Chance for Success” index, Alabama ranked No. 41 with a C-plus grade. • In the “K-12 Achievement” Index, Alabama ranked 43rd, with a D grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Medicare FFS Emergency Transport Claims by State and County Or Equivalent Entity, 2017
    Number of Medicare FFS Emergency Transport Claims by State, 2017 STATE/TERRITORY CLAIM COUNT ALABAMA 171,482 ALASKA 14,631 ARIZONA 140,516 ARKANSAS 122,909 CALIFORNIA 788,350 COLORADO 105,617 CONNECTICUT 152,831 DELAWARE 47,239 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 25,593 FLORIDA 637,127 GEORGIA 289,687 GUAM 2,338 HAWAII 19,028 IDAHO 35,581 ILLINOIS 419,315 INDIANA 229,877 IOWA 104,965 KANSAS 92,760 KENTUCKY 184,636 LOUISIANA 163,083 MAINE 72,731 MARYLAND 194,231 MASSACHUSETTS 318,382 MICHIGAN 327,029 MINNESOTA 146,030 MISSISSIPPI 141,840 MISSOURI 222,075 MONTANA 26,943 NEBRASKA 49,449 NEVADA 75,571 NEW HAMPSHIRE 57,423 NEW JERSEY 315,471 NEW MEXICO 55,554 NEW YORK 493,291 NORTH CAROLINA 418,959 NORTH DAKOTA 21,502 NORTHERN MARIANAS 826 STATE/TERRITORY CLAIM COUNT OHIO 390,605 OKLAHOMA 150,046 OREGON 98,867 PENNSYLVANIA 391,482 PUERTO RICO 7,769 RHODE ISLAND 40,743 SOUTH CAROLINA 219,186 SOUTH DAKOTA 26,748 TENNESSEE 237,657 TEXAS 629,151 UTAH 32,309 VERMONT 29,689 VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,577 VIRGINIA 271,194 WASHINGTON 179,466 WEST VIRGINIA 93,968 WISCONSIN 158,239 WYOMING 17,357 Number of Medicare FFS Emergency Transport Claims by State and County or Equivalent Entity, 2017 STATE/TERRITORY COUNTY/EQUIVALENT CLAIM COUNT ALABAMA Autauga 1,326 ALABAMA Baldwin 7,050 ALABAMA Barbour 1,256 ALABAMA Bibb 429 ALABAMA Blount 1,372 ALABAMA Bullock 246 ALABAMA Butler 1,058 ALABAMA Calhoun 5,975 ALABAMA Chambers 1,811 ALABAMA Cherokee 885 ALABAMA Chilton 1,298 ALABAMA Choctaw 777 ALABAMA Clarke 980 ALABAMA Clay 491 ALABAMA Cleburne 628 ALABAMA Coffee 1,941 ALABAMA Colbert
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 2019 FREE GUIDE Memorial Day
    MAY 2019 FREE GUIDE Memorial Day WE WILL MATCH ANY REPUTABLE REALTOR’S COMMISSION STRUCTURE OF REAL ESTATE AGENTS TOP 1% IN THE COUNTRY Your home may be worth WAY more than you think! Call Jeff at 561.440.4003 2 easy ways to get your home value Text “TTValues” to 59559 or visit www.HomeValuePalmBeach.com YOUR LOCAL REAL ESTATE experts and neighbors CONTACT US TODAY TO HAVE YOUR HOME ADVERTISED IN OUR NEXT EDITION CLIENT TESTIMONIALS We had a choice of three SunFest top agents to list our home with. We choose Jeff and his team. We were not disappointed MAY 2ND - 5TH | WEST PALM BEACH with the out come. We had multiple showings and received an offer within 13 days of our home being Florida’s largest waterfront music and art listed. Jeff took care of everything. You will be festival, SunFest, has taken place every happy using Jeff and his year since 1982. So why not come out to team. see what keeps this fun and entertaining - C Plummer festival alive year after year? The festival provides guests with five days of music and entertainment with more than 175,000 people in attendance each Jeff and his entire team year! are professional and very committed to a job well done. They get top dollar Check out the official website for more for your home and have information on tickets, schedules, event an extensive advertising details and more! program. I would highly recommend their services. It’s understandable why they are the top agency - Jacki Warren www.sunfest.com 2 easy ways to get your home value Text “TTValues” to 59559 or visit www.HomeValuePalmBeach.com 7180 KEY LARGO WAY 2160 ALWORTH TERRACE 3389 LAGO DE TALAVERA 3390 ARTESIAN DRIVE Beautifully remodeled home with impact glass, Gorgeous lakefront, estate home situated on an Gorgeous, estate home in exclusive Wellington Completely updated home situated on a great new kitchen and bathrooms expansive corner lot.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of Spanish Florida 1513 to 1821
    Conquistadores in the Land of Flowers: A Chronology of Spanish Florida 1513 to 1821 Compiled by Paul Eugen Camp Special Collections Department University of South Florida Library Tampa 2001 The First Spanish Period, 1513-1763 To a late sixteenth century Spaniard, “Florida” was a vast land stretching as far north as Chesapeake Bay and west to a point beyond the Mississippi. In the first half of the 1500's, Spain launched a series of expeditions to explore and colonize Florida. Although these expeditions brought back geographic knowledge, they were costly in blood and treasure, and failed to achieve a permanent Spanish settlement. The establishment of St. Augustine in 1565 marked the true beginning of Spain’s Florida colony. The remainder of the century saw the establishment of further settlements and the beginning of the mission system. During the seventeenth century, Spanish Florida prospered moderately, with an extensive system of Franciscan missions stretching from northern Georgia to the Florida panhandle, and large cattle ranchos operating in the Tallahassee and Alachua areas. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, war with England destroyed the missions and ranchos, and with them any hope of Florida becoming more than an isolated military frontier. By the time Spain turned Florida over to the British in 1763, Spanish control was limited to little more than St. Augustine, Pensacola and a few other outposts. 1510 Unrecorded Spanish expeditions searching for indian slaves probably reached the Florida coast as early as 1510, possibly even earlier. In 1565, the Spanish Council of the Indies claimed that Spanish ships had “gone to occupy” Florida ever since 1510.
    [Show full text]