DOCSLIB.ORG

A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices 1 2 3 1 Florian Schaub, Rebecca Balebako, ∗ Adam L. Durity, ∗ Lorrie Faith Cranor 1Carnegie Mellon University 2RAND Corporation 3Google Pittsburgh, PA, USA Pittsburgh, PA, USA Mountain View, CA, USA { fschaub, lorrie }@cmu.edu [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT website, or linked to from mobile app stores or mobile apps, Notifying users about a system’s data practices is supposed to signs posted in public places to inform about CCTV cam- to enable users to make informed privacy decisions. Yet, eras in operation. Even an LED indicating that a camera current notice and choice mechanisms, such as privacy poli- or microphone is active and recording constitutes a privacy cies, are often ineffective because they are neither usable notice, albeit one with limited information about the data nor useful, and are therefore ignored by users. Constrained practices associated with the recording. Providing notice interfaces on mobile devices, wearables, and smart home de- about data practices is an essential aspect of data protec- vices connected in an Internet of Things exacerbate the is- tion frameworks and regulation around the world [57]. While sue. Much research has studied usability issues of privacy transparency has been emphasized as an important practice notices and many proposals for more usable privacy notices for decades, existing privacy notices often fail to help users exist. Yet, there is little guidance for designers and develop- make informed choices. They can be lengthy or overly com- ers on the design aspects that can impact the effectiveness of plex, discouraging users from reading them. privacy notices. In this paper, we make multiple contribu- Smartphones and mobile apps introduce additional pri- tions to remedy this issue. We survey the existing literature vacy issues as they support recording of sensor and behav- on privacy notices and identify challenges, requirements, and ioral information that enables inference of behavior patterns best practices for privacy notice design. Further, we map out and profiling of users. Yet, comparatively smaller screens the design space for privacy notices by identifying relevant and other device restrictions constrain how users can be dimensions. This provides a taxonomy and consistent ter- given notice about and control over data practices. minology of notice approaches to foster understanding and The increasing adoption of wearable devices, such as smart reasoning about notice options available in the context of watches or fitness trackers, as well as smart home devices, specific systems. Our systemization of knowledge and the such as smart thermostats, connected light bulbs, or smart developed design space can help designers, developers, and meters, represents a trend towards smaller devices that are researchers identify notice and choice requirements and de- even more constrained in terms of interaction capabilities, velop a comprehensive notice concept for their system that but are also highly connected with each other and the cloud. addresses the needs of different audiences and considers the While providing notice and choice is still considered essential system’s limitations and opportunities for providing notice. in the“Internet of Things”(IoT) [48, 74], finding appropriate and usable notice and choice mechanisms can be challenging. The challenges of providing usable privacy notice have 1. INTRODUCTION been recognized by regulators and researchers. For instance, The purpose of a privacy notice is to make a system’s users FTC chairwoman Edith Ramirez [107] stated in the IoT con- or a company’s customers aware of data practices involving text: “In my mind, the question is not whether consumers personal information. Internal practices with regard to the should be given a say over unexpected uses of their data; collection, processing, retention, and sharing of personal in- rather, the question is how to provide simplified notice and formation should be transparent to users. The privacy notice choice.” An extensive body of research has studied usability acts as a public announcement of those practices. Privacy issues of privacy notices (e.g., [14, 33, 64, 51]) and proposed notices can take different shapes and leverage different chan- improved notice interfaces (e.g., [34, 66, 67]), as well as tech- nels, ranging from a privacy policy document posted on a nical means to support them (e.g., [75, 127, 131]). Multi- stakeholder processes have been initiated in the wake of the ∗Rebecca Balebako and Adam Durity performed this work while at Carnegie Mellon University. White House’s proposed Consumer Bill of Rights [122] to tackle transparency and control issues of mobile privacy [92] and facial recognition [93]. While such efforts have resulted in guidance for notices in the context of particular systems, they have given little consideration to usability [14]. Existing frameworks and processes for building privacy- friendly systems, such as Privacy by Design [36] or privacy Copyright is held by the author/owner. Permission to make digital or hard impact assessments [136], focus on the analysis of a system’s copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted data practices and less so on the design of notices. Even the without fee. Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2015, July 22–24, OECD report on “making privacy notices simple” [94] basi- 2015, Ottawa, Canada. 1 USENIX Association 2015 Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security 1 cally states that one should design a simplified notice, con- plain their purpose and intentions in order to gain user ac- duct usability tests, and deploy it – the crucial point of how ceptance and avoid backlash. Furthermore, companies that to design a simplified notice is not addressed. Common pro- provide privacy-friendly and secure systems can leverage pri- posals to improve the usability of privacy notices are the use vacy notices to make users aware of privacy-friendly data of multi-layered notices [9, 26] or just-in-time notices [47]. practices. Implementing and highlighting good security and Despite the previous work on privacy notices, transparency privacy practices can further create a competitive advantage tools, and privacy mechanisms, a system designer or devel- as users may perceive the system as more trustworthy. oper has very little guidance on how to arrive at a privacy Regulators, such as data protection authorities or the FTC, notice design suitable and appropriate for their specific sys- rely on companies’ privacy notices – primarily their privacy tem and its respective characteristics. Existing best prac- policies – as an important tool to investigate and enforce reg- tices are spread throughout the literature and have not pre- ulatory compliance [31]. If a company violates its privacy viously been organized into a comprehensive design frame- policy, it provides regulators with a basis to take action; work. As a result, privacy notices are often hastily bolted for example, the FTC may treat a violation as an unfair on rather than well-integrated into a system’s interaction de- or deceptive trade practice [45, 116]. Further, data protec- sign. Designers may not be aware of the many alternatives tion authorities in Europe and other countries may assess for designing usable privacy notices and therefore do not whether the described practices meet more stringent crite- systematically consider the options. Furthermore, designers ria, such as use limitation, proportionality of data practices, and researchers do not yet have a standard vocabulary for and user access options [41, 43]. describing privacy notice options. In this paper, we make multiple contributions to ease the design of privacy notices and their integration into a system. 2.2 Hurdles to Effective Privacy Notices The goal is to help developers embed privacy notices and While privacy notices fulfill many roles for different stake- choice options into their system design where relevant, with holders, in practice most privacy notices are ineffective at in- minimal disruption to the system’s interaction flow. First, forming consumers [33, 83]. This ineffectiveness stems from we identify challenges, requirements, and best practices for hurdles that can be attributed not only to general shortcom- the design of privacy notices. Based on a survey of existing ings of the notice and choice concept [25, 33, 116], but also literature and privacy notice examples, we develop a design to the challenges in designing effective privacy notices. space of privacy notices. This design space and its dimen- Notice complexity. The different roles of privacy notices sions provide a systemization of knowledge and a taxonomy result in a conflation of requirements. Besides informing to foster understanding and reasoning about opportunities users about data practices and their choices, privacy notices for privacy notices and controls. We demonstrate the util- serve to demonstrate compliance with (self-)regulation and ity of our design space by discussing existing privacy notice limit the system provider’s liability [23]. As a result, pri- approaches in different domains. vacy notices often take the shape of long privacy policies or terms of service that are necessarily complex because the 2. BACKGROUND respective laws, regulations, and business practices are com- The concept of privacy notices is founded on the idea that plex [25]. For instance, website privacy policies are typically users of services and systems that collect or process personal long, complex documents laden with legal jargon. Indeed information should be informed about what information is it has been estimated that to read the privacy policies for collected about them and for which purposes, with whom it all the websites an American Internet user visits annually is shared, how long it is stored, and their options for con- would take about 244 hours per year [83]. Privacy policies trolling or preventing certain data practices [45, 95]. Given also read like contracts because regulators aim to enforce such transparency, users should be able to make informed them like contracts [25]. Notices may further be purpose- privacy and consent decisions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Privacy and Cyber Security Emphasizing Privacy Protection in Cyber Security Activities
    Privacy and Cyber Security Emphasizing privacy protection in cyber security activities December 2014 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Cyber Security Challenges ................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Cyber Security Policy Developments ................................................................................................................. 5 3. Conclusion: Emphasizing privacy protection in cyber security activities .......................................................... 7 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 Victoria Street – 1st Floor, Gatineau, QC K1A 1H3 • Toll-free: 1-800-282-1376 • Fax: (819) 994-5424 • TDD (819) 994-6591 www.priv.gc.ca • Follow us on Twitter: @privacyprivee Abstract This research report examines the common interests and tensions between privacy and cyber security. It explores how challenges for cyber security are also challenges for privacy and data protection, considers how cyber security policy can affect privacy, and notes how cyberspace governance and security is a global issue. Finally, it sets out key policy
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Privacy Policy
    Digital Privacy Policy This Internet Privacy Policy explains how we may collect information from you when you visit our web site or when you use our online financial services. We recognize the importance our customers place on the privacy and security of their personal information. Our goal is to protect your personal information in every way that we interact with you, whether it's on the telephone, in our lobby, at one of our ATMs, or on the Internet. We think it is important for you to be informed of the policies, procedures, and security measures that we have in place to safeguard your personal and confidential information. With that in mind, we have developed this Internet Privacy Policy to help you to understand the steps we take to protect your personal information when you utilize our online financial services. Below are several definitions of terms used within this policy: Customer Information - Customer Information refers to personally identifiable information about a consumer, customer or former customer of this Institution. Internet Protocol (IP) Address - an IP address is a unique address that devices use in order to identify and communicate with each other on a computer network. An IP address can be thought of as a street address or a phone number for a computer or other network device on the Internet. Just as each street address and phone number uniquely identifies a building or telephone, an IP address can uniquely identify a specific computer or other network device on a network. We may use IP addresses to monitor login activity and for identification purposes when necessary for security investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Market for Digital Privacy a Failure?1
    Is the Market for Digital Privacy a Failure?1 Caleb S. Fuller2 Abstract Why do many digital firms rely on collecting consumer information–a practice that survey evidence shows is widely disliked? Why don’t they, instead, charge a fee that would protect privacy? This paper empirically adjudicates between two competing hypotheses. The first holds that firms pursue this strategy because consumers are ill-informed and thus susceptible to exploitation. The second holds that this strategy reasonably approximates consumer preferences. By means of survey, I test a.) the extent of information asymmetry in digital markets, b.) consumers’ valuation of privacy, and c.) whether government failure contributes to consumer mistrust of information collection. My results indicate that a.) the extent of information asymmetry is minimal, b.) there is significant divergence between “notional” and “real” demand for privacy and c.) that government contributes to consumer distrust of information collection by private firms. Significantly, almost 82% of Google users are unwilling to pay anything for increased digital privacy. JEL-Classification: D23, K29, Z18 Keywords: privacy paradox, digital privacy, survey, market failure 1 I wish to thank Alessandro Acquisti, Peter Leeson, Chris Coyne, Peter Boettke, David Lucas, Noah Gould, and Nicholas Freiling for helpful suggestions. All errors are my own. I am also indebted to the Mercatus Center for providing funding for the survey conducted by Haven Insights LLC. 2 Assistant professor of economics, Grove City College, Email: 1 INTRODUCTION Google’s motto is “Don’t Be Evil.” But the fact that the company surreptitiously collects the information of over one billion individuals annually leads some to question whether the firm’s business model runs afoul of its dictum (Hoofnagle 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
    The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age April 9, 2018 Dr. Keith Goldstein, Dr. Ohad Shem Tov, and Mr. Dan Prazeres Presented on behalf of Pirate Parties International Headquarters, a UN ECOSOC Consultative Member, for the Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Our Dystopian Present Living in modern society, we are profiled. We accept the necessity to hand over intimate details about ourselves to proper authorities and presume they will keep this information secure- only to be used under the most egregious cases with legal justifications. Parents provide governments with information about their children to obtain necessary services, such as health care. We reciprocate the forfeiture of our intimate details by accepting the fine print on every form we sign- or button we press. In doing so, we enable second-hand trading of our personal information, exponentially increasing the likelihood that our data will be utilized for illegitimate purposes. Often without our awareness or consent, detection devices track our movements, our preferences, and any information they are capable of mining from our digital existence. This data is used to manipulate us, rob from us, and engage in prejudice against us- at times legally. We are stalked by algorithms that profile all of us. This is not a dystopian outlook on the future or paranoia. This is present day reality, whereby we live in a data-driven society with ubiquitous corruption that enables a small number of individuals to transgress a destitute mass of phone and internet media users. In this paper we present a few examples from around the world of both violations of privacy and accomplishments to protect privacy in online environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Privacy Report
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANNUAL PRIVACY REPORT THE CHIEF PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OFFICER AND THE OFFICE OF PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OCTOBER 1, 2016 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 1 (MULTI) ANNUAL PRIVACY REPORT MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OFFICER I am pleased to present the Department of Justice’s (Department or DOJ) Annual Privacy Report, describing the operations and activities of the Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer (CPCLO) and the Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties (OPCL), in accordance with Section 1174 of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005. This report covers the period from October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2020. The Department’s privacy program is supported by a team of dedicated privacy professionals who strive to build a culture and understanding of privacy within the complex and diverse mission work of the Department. The work of the Department’s privacy team is evident in the care, consideration, and dialogue about privacy that is incorporated in the daily operations of the Department. During this reporting period, there has been an evolving landscape of technological development and advancement in areas such as artificial intelligence, biometrics, complex data flows, and an increase in the number of cyber security events resulting in significant impacts to the privacy of individuals. Thus, the CPCLO and OPCL have developed new policies and guidance to assist the Department with navigating these areas, some of which include the following:
    [Show full text]
  • Piracy Versus Privacy: an Analysis of Values Encoded in the Piratebrowser
    International Journal of Communication 9(2015), 818–838 1932–8036/20150005 Piracy Versus Privacy: An Analysis of Values Encoded in the PirateBrowser BALÁZS BODÓ University of Amsterdam, Institute for Information Law The Netherlands The PirateBrowser is a Web browser that uses Tor privacy-enhancing technology to circumvent nationally implemented Internet filters blocking access to The Pirate Bay. This article analyzes the possible consequences of a mass influx of copyright pirates into the privacy domain. The article addresses the effects of the uptake of strong privacy technologies by pirates on copyright enforcement and on free speech and privacy technology domains. Also discussed are the norms and values reflected in the specific design choices taken by the developers of the PirateBrowser. Keywords: piracy, privacy, Tor, privacy-enhancing technologies, policy Introduction Tor (The Onion Router), “endorsed by Egyptian activists, WikiLeaks, NSA, GCHQ, Chelsea Manning, Snowden” (Dingledine & Appelbaum, 2013), is a volunteer network of computers that relays Web traffic through itself to provide anonymous, unobserved, and uncensored access to the Internet. It has about 4,000 relays and about 1,000 exit nodes. Tor users connect to the network, and their Web traffic is channeled through the internal relays to reach its final destination through one of the exit nodes. This arrangement makes the identification and surveillance of Tor users difficult. Anonymity is promised by the difficulty of tracing the Web traffic that appears on the exit node back to the individual who initiated the traffic, as long as there is a sufficient number of internal hops in between. Protection from surveillance is granted by the fact that each link in the communication chain is encrypted.
    [Show full text]
  • COVERING CYBER Media Coverage of Cyber Issues Since 2014
    COVERING CYBER Media Coverage of Cyber Issues Since 2014 Sean Aday Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication George Washington University COVERING COVERING CYBER CYBER About the Author: Sean Aday is an associate professor of MEDIA COVERAGE OF CYBER media and public affairs and ISSUES SINCE 2014 international affairs at George Washington University. ABOUT THE REPORT This report analyzes media coverage of cyber issues in major American newspapers and network and cable news broadcasts since About IPDGC: 2014 to assess how these issues are being framed in the press, and what aspects of this complex topic are reaching news audiences. In The Institute for Public addition, specialty online media are analyzed in comparison to Diplomacy and Global Communication at traditional media coverage. George Washington University is a leading The report shows that cyber is becoming more prominent on the news organization in the agenda in the U.S., but that it is simultaneously receiving less field of public substantive coverage. Cyber is thus more likely to be covered as an diplomacy and global event than as policy. The report discusses implications of these and communication issues. other findings. It is jointly administered by the Columbian College of Arts and Sciences and the Elliott School of International Affairs. www.ipdgc.gwu.edu 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary p. 1 II. Introduction p. 3 III. Findings p. 4 IV. Conclusions p. 13 VI. Appendix 1: Methodology p. 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study primarily analyzed coverage of cyber related issues in 20 of the highest circulation newspapers in the United States, as well as that on all three network newscasts and CNN and Fox News Channel, from January 2014-June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing for Data Privacy in the Workplace | Steelcase
    Privacy Data Privacy. By Design. The benefits of a connected world—greater innovation, growth and prosperity—will not be realized unless people can trust that data being collected is managed and analyzed responsibly. “As data becomes the key resource for every business, the security and privacy of data becomes every organization’s concern.” STUART BERMAN | IT security architect at Steelcase THE SMALLEST ACTIONS CAN HAVE THE BIGGEST IMPLICATIONS Every day we trade private information about ourselves inreturn for digital services. We make an online purchase, use a search engine, or download an app, and Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon and others harvest data about where we go, what we buy, who we interact with online. 1 For many people this is a reasonable trade, data for services that make life easier, more interesting, more fun. Others are less comfortable about this tradeoff. etY everyone expects their personal data to remain private and secure. “Privacy in the workplace used to be about audio privacy, visual privacy, territorial privacy and informational privacy,” says Steelcase Senior Design Researcher, Melanie Redman. “These are types of privacy people say they need in order to focus. “What’s changed is how we think about informational privacy: now we think about data privacy and about psychological privacy, because our perception of privacy impacts all of our other experiences. Privacy is more contextual in the workplace, more personal and a topic of growing importance in every organization.” PRIVACY IN A CONNECTED WORLD Privacy is not a new issue for Steelcase. The company has conducted research on privacy in the workplace for over two decades, and three years ago began to study digital privacy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical and Legal Overview of the Tor Anonymity Network
    Emin Çalışkan, Tomáš Minárik, Anna-Maria Osula Technical and Legal Overview of the Tor Anonymity Network Tallinn 2015 This publication is a product of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (the Centre). It does not necessarily reflect the policy or the opinion of the Centre or NATO. The Centre may not be held responsible for any loss or harm arising from the use of information contained in this publication and is not responsible for the content of the external sources, including external websites referenced in this publication. Digital or hard copies of this publication may be produced for internal use within NATO and for personal or educational use when for non- profit and non-commercial purpose, provided that copies bear a full citation. www.ccdcoe.org [email protected] 1 Technical and Legal Overview of the Tor Anonymity Network 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Tor and Internet Filtering Circumvention ....................................................................................... 4 2.1. Technical Methods .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1. Proxy ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2. Tunnelling/Virtual Private Networks ............................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Spying on Students: School Issued Devices and Student Privacy (EFF)
    Spying on Students SCHOOL-ISSUED DEVICES AND STUDENT PRIVACY Frida Alim, Bridge Fellow Na e Cardo!o, Se"ior Sta## A or"e$ %e""ie Ge&'art, Re(ear)'er *are" Gullo, Media Relatio"( Anal$( Amul Kalia, Anal$( A-ril 1/, 21.2 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION EFF3OR% 1 Authors: Frida Alim, Nate Cardozo, Gennie Gebhart, Karen Gullo, Amul Kalia With assistance from: Sophia Cope, Hugh D’Andrade, Jeremy Gillula, Rainey Reitman A publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2017. “Spying on Students: School-Issued Devices and Student Privacy” is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION EFF3OR% 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Part 1: Survey Results................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methods..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Respondents and Overall Trends....................................................................................................................10 Findings..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I. Cyber Security and Protecting Against Cyber Warfare
    I. Cyber Security and Protecting Against Cyber Warfare Introduction Ensuring international peace and security in cyberspace is currently one of the most prevalent topics of discussion due to the plethora of cyberattacks that threaten countries’ stability and overall sustainable development.77 The United Nations (UN) system acknowledged that the efforts of the General Assembly First Committee to ensure international peace and security have to focus particularly on securing critical cyber infrastructure and information and communications technologies (ICTs) that dominate everyday life.78 The threat not only stems from possible escalation of cyber warfare among states but also criminal and terrorist activities in cyberspace.79 Terrorist organizations use the cyber sphere to spread their messages, mobilize human and financial resources, and to directly attack critical infrastructure, such as hospitals, water systems, energy, or financial services, to harm states and their people.80 However, in an effort to ensure cyber security, some Member States have taken up measures that violate fundamental human rights recognized in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).81 The term cyber security commonly comprises “the collection of tools, policies, security concepts, security safeguards, guidelines, risk management approaches, actions, training, best practices, assurance, and technologies that can be used to protect the cyber environment and organization and user’s assets.”82 Protecting the cyber sphere against the threat of cyberattacks,
    [Show full text]
  • National Intelligence Council's Global Trends 2040
    A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL MARCH 2021 2040 GLOBAL TRENDS A MORE CONTESTED WORLD A MORE CONTESTED WORLD a Image / Bigstock “Intelligence does not claim infallibility for its prophecies. Intelligence merely holds that the answer which it gives is the most deeply and objectively based and carefully considered estimate.” Sherman Kent Founder of the Office of National Estimates Image / Bigstock Bastien Herve / Unsplash ii GLOBAL TRENDS 2040 Pierre-Chatel-Innocenti / Unsplash 2040 GLOBAL TRENDS A MORE CONTESTED WORLD MARCH 2021 NIC 2021-02339 ISBN 978-1-929667-33-8 To view digital version: www.dni.gov/nic/globaltrends A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL Pierre-Chatel-Innocenti / Unsplash TABLE OF CONTENTS v FOREWORD 1 INTRODUCTION 1 | KEY THEMES 6 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 | THE COVID-19 FACTOR: EXPANDING UNCERTAINTY 14 STRUCTURAL FORCES 16 | DEMOGRAPHICS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 23 | Future Global Health Challenges 30 | ENVIRONMENT 42 | ECONOMICS 54 | TECHNOLOGY 66 EMERGING DYNAMICS 68 | SOCIETAL: DISILLUSIONED, INFORMED, AND DIVIDED 78 | STATE: TENSIONS, TURBULENCE, AND TRANSFORMATION 90 | INTERNATIONAL: MORE CONTESTED, UNCERTAIN, AND CONFLICT PRONE 107 | The Future of Terrorism: Diverse Actors, Fraying International Efforts 108 SCENARIOS FOR 2040 CHARTING THE FUTURE AMID UNCERTAINTY 110 | RENAISSANCE OF DEMOCRACIES 112 | A WORLD ADRIFT 114 | COMPETITIVE COEXISTENCE 116 | SEPARATE SILOS 118 | TRAGEDY AND MOBILIZATION 120 REGIONAL FORECASTS 141 TABLE OF GRAPHICS 142 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv GLOBAL TRENDS 2040 FOREWORD elcome to the 7th edition of the National Intelligence Council’s Global Trends report. Published every four years since 1997, Global Trends assesses the key Wtrends and uncertainties that will shape the strategic environment for the United States during the next two decades.
    [Show full text]