How Many Weapons Are There in Cambodia?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Many Weapons Are There in Cambodia? 4 How Many Weapons Are There in Cambodia? By Christina Wille A Working Paper of the Small Arms Survey The Small Arms Survey Contents The Small Arms Survey is an independent research project located at the Acronyms and abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. It serves as About the author ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 the principal source of public information on all aspects of small arms and as a resource centre for governments, policy-makers, researchers, and activists. Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Established in 1999, the project is supported by the Swiss Federal Depart- Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 ment of Foreign Affairs, and by contributions from the Governments of Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United I. Approaches to estimating the size of Kingdom. The Survey is also grateful for past and current project-specifi c sup- small arms and light weapons stockpiles ............................................................................................................... 9 port received from Australia, Denmark, and New Zealand. Further funding has II. Traditions and cultural patterns of civilian gun been provided by the United Nations Development Programme, the United ownership in Cambodia prior to the civil war and factional Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, the Geneva International Academic attitudes to civilian fi rearms access during the civil war ....................................................... 12 Network, and the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. The role of fi rearms in rural life prior to the war .......................................................................................... 12 The Small Arms Survey collaborates with research institutes and non-govern- mental organizations in many countries, including Brazil, Canada, Georgia, Firearms ownership among Cambodia’s elite ................................................................................................. 13 Germany, India, Israel, Jordan, Norway, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Civil war, factional fi ghting, and civilian gun ownership ............................................................ 14 Sri Lanka, Sweden, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. III. Factions and their weapons: estimating the number The Working Paper series is published periodically and is available on the of civil war weapons in Cambodia ................................................................................................................................. 16 project’s Web site. Cambodian People’s Armed Forces (CPAF) and the Small Arms Survey Cambodia People’s Party (CPP) ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Graduate Institute of International Studies The anti-communist opposition forces: Khmer People’s 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland National Liberation Armed Forces (KPNLAF) and Phone: +41 22 908 5777 National Army of Independent Kampuchea (ANKI) .......................................................................... 18 Fax: +41 22 732 2738 Khmer Rouge ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Email: [email protected] IV. How many weapons were brought under Web site: www.smallarmssurvey.org government control during the 1990s? ..................................................................................................................... 21 Creation of the RCAF and police ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Weapons collection, confi scation, and destruction .................................................................................. 22 2 Small Arms Survey Working Paper 4 Wille How Many Weapons Are There in Cambodia? 3 Imports and exports .................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Acronyms and abbreviations Putting the estimates together .................................................................................................................................................. 29 V. Triangulation .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 VI. Is this a new number? ............................................................................................................................................................... 35 ANKI National Army of Independent Kampuchea (formerly ANS) Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 ANS Armée Nationale Sihanoukiste Endnotes ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 CPAF Cambodian People’s Armed Forces CPP Cambodia People’s Party Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 40 EU ASAC European Union’s Assistance on Curbing Small Arms and Light Weapons in the Kingdom of Cambodia EUR euro FUNCINPEC Front uni national pour un Cambodge indépendant, neutre, pacifi que et coopératif JSAC Japan Assistance Team for Small Arms Management in Cambodia KPNLAF Khmer People’s National Liberation Armed Forces KPNLF Khmer People’s National Liberation Front KPRAF Khmer People’s Revolutionary Armed Forces LTTE Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam NADK National Army of Democratic Kampuchea RCAF Royal Cambodian Armed Forces USD United States dollar 4 Small Arms Survey Working Paper 4 Wille How Many Weapons Are There in Cambodia? 5 About the author Acknowledgements Christina Wille has been a staff member of the Small Arms Survey since Feb- This Working Paper is the result of a review of available sources on weapons ruary 2003. She has managed and coordinated several research projects and has proliferation in Cambodia. It benefi ted from substantial input from Peter carried out fi eldwork in Southeast and Central Asia and sub-Saharan Africa on Bartu and support and insight from David de Beer. Vital information was pro- human security issues related to small arms and migration. A particular focus vided by Adrian Sprangemeijer, Alain Perigaud, Seng Son, and the JSAC team. of her work has been identifi cation of indicators to measure human security. ‘Troung’, a contributor to the Air Combat Information Group, also provided Prior to joining the Small Arms Survey, she served as junior expert to the Euro- valuable facts. Anne-Kathrin Glatz and Nicholas Marsh provided important pean Commission in Slovenia and worked as researcher for the Asian Research help with respect to Comtrade import data. Barbara Gimelli Sulashvili con- Center for Migration in Bangkok and the Migration Policy Group in Brussels. tributed through her careful fact-checking. The paper further benefi ted from She holds degrees from the Universities of Cambridge and Durham in the Alex Potter’s editing skills. United Kingdom. 6 Small Arms Survey Working Paper 4 Wille How Many Weapons Are There in Cambodia? 7 Introduction I. Approaches to estimating the size of small arms and light weapons stockpiles This background paper explains the evidence and logic for the small arms and light weapons stockpile estimates for Cambodia that are presented in the In the absence of reliable registration data, stockpile fi gures are always estimates. 2006 Small Arms Survey yearbook chapter (Small Arms Survey, 2006) and Small arms research usually makes a distinction between government stock- other Small Arms Survey publications on Cambodia. These state that there piles and privately owned fi rearms. The fi rst category is somewhat easier to are 107,000–188,000 small arms and light weapons presently in government estimate than the latter. Some governments provide public information on 22 000 85 000 stockpiles, and , – , weapons outside of government control. their small arms and light weapon stockpiles. This information can be used to The estimate of legal and illegal stockpiles was carried out during 2005. It is derive typical multipliers of the number of small arms per soldier (Small Arms based on interviews
Recommended publications
  • Policy Solutions to Address Mass Shootings
    POLICY BRIEF Policy Solutions to Address Mass Shootings Michael Rocque Grant Duwe Michael Siegel James Alan Fox Max Goder-Reiser Emma E. Fridel August 2021 1 SYNOPSIS This project was supported by grant #2018-75-CX-0025, awarded by the In the past decade, mass shootings, National Institute of Justice, Office of particularly those that take place Justice Programs, US Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, in public areas, have increasingly and conclusions or recommendations become part of the national expressed in this publication are those conversation in the United States. of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Mass public shootings instill Justice. widespread fear, in part because of their seeming randomness and unpredictability. Yet when these incidents occur, which has been with somewhat greater frequency and lethality as of late, public calls for ABOUT THE AUTHORS policy responses are immediate. In Michael Rocque is an associate this policy brief, we review efforts professor of sociology at Bates to evaluate the effect of gun control College measures on mass public shootings, Grant Duwe is the director of research and evaluation at the including a discussion of our recently Minnesota Department of Corrections published study on the relationship Michael Siegel is a member of the between state gun laws and the Regional Gun Violence Research incidence and severity of these Consortium and a professor in the Department of Community Health shootings. The findings of this work Sciences at the Boston University point to gun permits and bans on School of Public Health large capacity magazines as having James Alan Fox is the Lipman promise in reducing (a) mass public family professor of criminology, law, shooting rates and (b) mass public and public policy at Northeastern University shooting victimization, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2015 The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings Andrew D. Manor University of Central Florida Part of the Legal Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Manor, Andrew D., "The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings" (2015). HIM 1990-2015. 1872. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1872 THE INFLUENCE OF GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION ON RAMPAGE SHOOTINGS by ANDREW D. MANOR A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Legal Studies in the College of Health and Public Affairs and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2015 Thesis Chair: Dr. James Beckman Abstract The United States has experienced several mass shootings in the past few years. It has been averaging one shooting every week in 2015, and something must be done about it. This problem appears to be limited to the United States since several other nations have been able to minimize, and almost eliminate the number of mass shootings. By taking an analysis of the gun laws of the United States with those of Australia and Canada it can be concluded that some aspects of strict gun control can reduce the number of mass shootings.
    [Show full text]
  • State Gun Laws, Gun Ownership, and Mass Shootings in the US: Cross Sectional Time Series BMJ: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.L542 on 6 March 2019
    RESEARCH State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.l542 on 6 March 2019. Downloaded from cross sectional time series Paul M Reeping,1 Magdalena Cerdá,2 Bindu Kalesan,3 Douglas J Wiebe,4 Sandro Galea,5 Charles C Branas1 1Department of Epidemiology, ABSTRACT a growing divide appears to be emerging between Columbia University, Mailman OBJECTIVE restrictive and permissive states. School of Public Health, 722 To determine whether restrictiveness-permissiveness West 168th Street, New York, of state gun laws or gun ownership are associated NY 10032, USA Introduction 2 with mass shootings in the US. Department of Population Despite an increasing frequency of mass shootings in Health, New York University, DESIGN Langone School of Medicine, the US and the seemingly disproportionate occurrence New York, NY, USA Cross sectional time series. of mass shootings in some states and not others, little 3Department of Community SETTING AND POPULATION research has been carried out to understand state level Health Sciences, Boston US gun owners from 1998-2015. factors that could influence mass shootings.1 A 2018 University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA EXPOSURE report pointed to only three studies that had examined 4Department of Biostatistics, An annual rating between 0 (completely restrictive) associations between gun laws and mass shooting Epidemiology & Informatics, and 100 (completely permissive) for the gun laws events.2-5 However, testing the effects of state gun University of Pennsylvania, of all 50 states taken from a reference guide for laws on the occurrence of mass shootings was not the Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA gun owners traveling between states from 1998 to primary objective of at least one of these studies and 5Boston University School of 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2009 The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Babat, David, "The Discriminatory History of Gun Control" (2009). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 140. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. David Babat [email protected] The Discriminatory History of Gun Control Introduction Gun control in the United States is based on a long history of discrimination which continues to this day. While blacks were the first targets of gun control measures, different racial and ethnic minorities have been targeted over time, and today the poor now face economic discrimination in many gun control laws. Gun control may be portrayed as a measure to reduce crime,1 but even in its earliest forms firearms regulation has been used as a means to control specific societal groups by keeping them from possessing weapons. The first selectively restrictive gun control legislation was enacted in the pre-Revolution South and primarily aimed at keeping free blacks from owning firearms and maintaining a white monopoly on power. Many different forms of gun control laws were implemented before and after the Revolution to keep firearms out of African-American hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Cambodian Ngoreport on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman
    Joint Cambodian NGO Report on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in the Kingdom of Cambodia Presented to the UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) prior to Cambodia’s second periodic report at the 45th session of CAT, held in Geneva from 1 to 19 November 2010 October 2010 Jointly prepared by Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC), Cambodian Defenders Projects (CDP), Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO), Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee (CHRAC), and endorsed by Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC); Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR); Coordination of Action Research on AIDS and Mobility (CARAM Cambodia); Community Legal Education Center (CLEC); Cambodian Women in Crisis Center (CWCC); Khmer Institute of Democracy (KID); Khmer Youth Association (KYA); Legal Aid of Cambodia (LAC); People’s Center for Development and Peace (PDP); Protection of Juvenile Justice (PJJ); Human Rights Vigilance of Cambodia (VIGILANCE) Table of Contents Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................3 I. Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………4‐5 II. Summary Recommendations ………………………………………………………………………………6‐7 III. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 IV. Comments on the Cambodia Report and Replies to the List of Issues ……………….9‐43 V. Recommendations ………………………………………………………………………………………….44‐46 Annex 2 Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • The Parkland School Shooting Controversial Issues in the News
    THE PARKLAND SCHOOL SHOOTING CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES IN THE NEWS ® CLOSE UP IN CLASS CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES IN THE NEWS THE PARKLAND SCHOOL SHOOTING CENTRAL QUESTION Which policy options should lawmakers consider to try and prevent school shootings in the future? QUICK RECAP On February 14, 2018, 19-year old Nikolas Cruz entered Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School (MSDHS) in Parkland, Florida, pulled a fire alarm, and as students and teachers left their classrooms, he shot at them with an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle. Before1 running off, Cruz had killed 17 people and wounded at least 14 more. Cruz had been a student at the school, but had been expelled for disciplinary issues. He was later caught by law enforcement and has confessed to the crimes. CLASSROOM DISCUSSION GUIDE How have politicians and policymakers responded to this tragedy? To help foster a classroom conversation about the appropriate political response to the Parkland school shooting, read the following quotes from politicians with dif- Which quote do you agree with most? Why? Do you believe common ground can be found between these positions? Do you think the problem is mostly about guns or mostly aboutfering somethingviews on gun else, control. such as After mental reading illness? the quotes, ask students: 2 “If you are not working today to try to fix this, to try to stop these shootings, then you’re an accomplice. Those are tough words but they’re true.” —Senator Chris Murphy, D-Conn. “The reaction3 of Democrats to any tragedy is to try to politicize it.… So they immediately start calling that we’ve got to take away the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Show Loophole
    Virginia State Crime Commission Gun Show Loophole 2008 GUN SHOW LOOPHOLE purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for Background a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms. During the 2008 session of the Virginia Gen- The phrase “with the principal objective of liveli- eral Assembly, Senator Henry L. Marsh, III, intro- hood and profit” is defined, in turn, as: duced Senate Bill 109, which would have required that a criminal background check be performed that the intent underlying the sale or disposition prior to the completion of any firearms sale of firearms is predominantly one of obtaining conducted at a gun show. This bill was referred to livelihood and pecuniary gain, as opposed to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee. The other intents, such as improving or liquidating a Committee referred the general subject matter of personal firearms collection: Provided, that the bill to the Crime Commission for study. The proof of profit shall not be required as to a per- bill was then put to a vote, and failed to report by a son who engages in the regular and repetitive vote of 6 Yeas to 9 Nays. purchase and disposition of firearms for crimi- nal purposes or terrorism. A formal Mission Statement was adopted by the Crime Commission to govern the parameters of In short, it is illegal for a person to regularly the study: sell firearms for profit, or as a means of liveli- hood, unless they have applied for and received Commission staff is directed to conduct a legal an FFL.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellie Hukin Thesis Final Draft Post Viva and Corrections6
    London School of Economics and Political Science Contraception in Cambodia Explaining Unmet Need Eleanor Frances Hukin A thesis submitted to the Department of Social Policy at the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September, 2012 Declaration of Authorship I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 79,756 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Janice Hukin. Eleanor Frances Hukin 2 Abstract This thesis aims to explain why there is a high level of unmet need for contraception in Cambodia - a country where effective methods of birth control are cheaply available and morally acceptable. The research design takes a mixed methods approach, initially using data from the Cambodian Demographic and Health Surveys of 2000 and 2005 to assess trends in contraceptive use.
    [Show full text]
  • Guns and School Safety: What Is the Best Way Forward?
    HANDOUT A Guns and School Safety: What Is the Best Way Forward? On February 14, 2018, a shooter armed with an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle went to his former high school in Parkland, Florida, and shot and killed 17 people. The community was traumatized. Within days, student-survivors of the shooting helped organize a rally. Speeches by students went viral. Students confronted lawmakers at a televised town hall. And their efforts gave the national debate on gun safety a new sense of urgency. The shooting and survivors’ responses also sparked debates about what schools should do to keep campuses safe. News outlets described the Parkland shooting as the 18th school shooting of 2018, less than two months into the year. Of those 18 incidents, two were suicides, three were accidental shootings, and nine involved no injuries or deaths. Not all school shootings are mass public shootings (or “mass shootings”). Certainly all shootings are concerning for Americans. Between 2006 and 2013, two out of seven mass shootings at schools involved more than 10 deaths. One of those two incidents was a 2007 shooting at Virginia Tech University. The other was the infamous shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary Commons Wikimedia School in Connecticut. Over the years, lawmakers have responded to these traumatic events, and the public has experienced disagreement about what should be done. What Is the Current Law? There are federal laws about gun safety at schools, and there are state laws. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In 2008, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's New Gun Control Philosophy: Public Health Is Paramount
    Australia’s New Gun Control Philosophy: Public Health is Paramount Rebecca Peters Roland Browne ABSTRACT As a pressing issue of public policy in Australia gun control remains very much alive, with the legislative response to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre marking a new beginning in regulating gun ownership. This paper argues that this regulatory framework reflects an important departure from the conventional “criminal justice” approach to gun control towards a “public health” response to gun violence. Prevention is the hallmark of public health and the key to a more rational gun control philosophy designed to reduce the likelihood of gun violence. In conjunction with broader efforts to better comprehend the factors leading to gun violence in Australian society, as well as the continuing exercise of strong political leadership, a public health approach to gun control may well deliver on its promise — a safer community. Keywords Criminal Justice, Gun Control, Public Health Rebecca Peters and Roland Browne are, respectively, former Chair and Chair of the National Coalition for Gun Control. ISSN 1443-8607 Volume 1, Number 2: November 2000, 63-73 The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs © 2000 School of Economics and Political Science, University of Sydney 64 THE DRAWING BOARD The day will come (perhaps it is already here) when Australians will wonder what the fuss over the new gun laws was all about. They may even wonder why their elected representatives agreed to rigorous regulation of guns in combination with tougher penalties on their misuse. This paper makes the case that policy-makers in Australia have moved courageously towards a public health model on gun control.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Control: National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Operations and Related Legislation
    Gun Control: National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Operations and Related Legislation October 17, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45970 SUMMARY R45970 Gun Control: National Instant Criminal October 17, 2019 Background Check System (NICS) Operations William J. Krouse and Related Legislation Specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) administers a computer system of systems that is used to query federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial criminal history record information (CHRI) and other records to determine an individual’s firearms transfer/receipt and possession eligibility. This FBI-administered system is the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). NICS, or parallel state systems, must be checked and the pending transfer approved by the FBI or state point of contact before a federally licensed gun dealer may transfer a firearm to any customer who is not also a federally licensed gun dealer. Current federal law does not require background checks for intrastate (same state), private-party firearms transactions between nondealers, though such checks are required under several state laws. In the 116th Congress, the House of Representatives passed three bills that would expand federal firearms background check requirements and firearms transfer/receipt and possession ineligibility criteria related to domestic violence. The Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019 (H.R. 8), a “universal” background check bill, would make nearly all intrastate, private-party firearms transactions subject to the recordkeeping and NICS background check requirements of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA). For the past two decades, many gun control advocates have viewed the legal circumstances that allow individuals to transfer firearms intrastate among themselves without being subject to the licensing, recordkeeping, and background check requirements of the GCA as a “loophole” in the law, particularly within the context of gun shows.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Holocausts and Gun Control
    Washington University Law Review Volume 75 Issue 3 1997 Of Holocausts and Gun Control Daniel D. Polsby Northwestern University Don B. Kates Jr. The Independent Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel D. Polsby and Don B. Kates Jr., Of Holocausts and Gun Control, 75 WASH. U. L. Q. 1237 (1997). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol75/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OF HOLOCAUSTS AND GUN CONTROL DANIEL D. POLSBY DON B. KATES, JR.* This essay seeks to reclaim a serious argument from the lunatic fringe. We argue a connection exists between the restrictiveness of a country's civilian weapons policy and its liability to commit genocide' upon its own people. This notion has received a good deal of disdainful public attention over the past several years because of the Oklahoma City bombing, the "Republic of Texas" siege, and the inflamed subculture from which the defendants in those incidents emerged. Some Americans, it appears, believe that their country is on the verge-if not in the grip-of a virtual coup by a sinister international directorate of Jews, one-worlders, and Trilateralists. For them, acting on this belief means arming oneself and confronting representatives of government with distrust, if not open hostility.
    [Show full text]