THE CONGRESS of MICRONESIA NORMAN MELLER with the Assistance of Terza Meller

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE CONGRESS of MICRONESIA NORMAN MELLER with the Assistance of Terza Meller THE CONGRESS OF MICRONESIA NORMAN MELLER with the assistance of Terza Meller THE CONGRESS OF MICRONESIA Development of the Legislative Process in the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Open Access edition funded by the National En- dowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Inter- national (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits readers to freely download and share the work in print or electronic format for non- commercial purposes, so long as credit is given to the author. Derivative works and commercial uses require permission from the publisher. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/li- censes/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The Creative Commons license described above does not apply to any material that is separately copy- righted. Open Access ISBNs: 9780824883683 (PDF) 9780824883690 (EPUB) This version created: 5 September, 2019 Please visit www.hawaiiopen.org for more Open Access works from University of Hawai‘i Press. v COPYRIGHT 1969 BY UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII PRESS Foreword IN ORDER TO WRITE a book about the development of leg- islatures in the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, it was first essential to determine how to identify a legislature. Obviously, reliance could not be placed upon names, as evidenced by the Olbiil era Kelulau, the body which functioned in the Palau dis- trict between the years 1955 and 1963: translated into English, this would be “meeting place of whispers!” Looking at functions proved equally ineffective. Belying the etymology, early in their histories institutions now referred to as legislatures “had little or no concern with legislation.”1 Even today, if it be accepted that law-making is the measure of a legislature, how can we reconcile the facts that in quantity of output, legislatures are eclipsed by the sheer bulk of quasi-legislation issued by administrative agencies and that the drama of their impact is overshadowed by judicial de- cisions setting impersonal precedents as binding as statutes for all to observe? Viewing the same problem from another perspective, at the 1234th meeting of the United Nations Trusteeship Council in 1964, Mr. Shakov, the representative of the Union of Soviet Social- ist Republics, declared “no representative legislative body as yet existed in the [American Administered Trust] Territory [of the Pa- cific Islands] … since the Council of Micronesia had turned out to be a purely consultative body” and that the then proposed Terri- tory-wide, bicameral Congress of Micronesia “would be only a consultative body, like the body that already existed … [because] no legislation could enter into force until it had been approved by the High Commissioner….”2 There can be no quarrel with the 1 Carl J. Friedrich, Constitutional Government and Democracy (Boston: Ginn and Co., 1950), p. 268. See also Charles A. Beard and John D. Lewis, “Represen- tative Government in Evolution,” American Political Science Review, 26:2 (April, 1932), 231–235; A. F. Pollard, The Evolution of Parliament (2d ed.; London: Long- mans, Green and Co., Ltd., 1926), pp. 44–60; George L. Haskins, The Growth of English Representative Government (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1948), passim. 2 Trusteeship Council Official Records, 31st Sess., 1234th meeting, June 8, 1964, pars. 14, 15. In future references, these reports will be referred to as TCOR. vii contention of the Soviet position if it implied that the exercise of law-making is insufficient per se to identify a legislature. However, the further constraining of the definion of a “legislature” to those bodies in which “the last word about what the law is to be rests”3 or whose “decision is both necessary and sufficient for the final enactment of a law”4 ignores the integral involvement of the exec- utive and fails to face the reality of the initiative, referendum, and recall. Such attempts to define a legislature by assigning it a quota of functions or residual powers reawaken the unfruitful attempts by political philosophers of yesteryear to identify the locus of sov- ereignty. Clearly, the classifier “legislature” carries no undisputed meaning nor necessarily describes any single institution common to various systems of government. None of the foregoing denies that it is principally through the enactment of statutes that the modern legislature has derived its saliency. A comparable inquiry into primacy put during Cromwell’s Long Parliament would probably have prompted a reply referring to the redress of grievances and the subordination of the king. In- deed, there is a strong probability that there are no functional de- limitations to the activity of a legislature, be it granting divorces, conducting wars, choosing chief executives, or molding a nation’s opinion. Rather, in any political system the legislature performs functions appropriate to that system as they have evolved by virtue of the legislature’s representative nature and its character- istic group process. Of all political institutions, the legislature as a corporate body is most aptly designed to bring the element of representation to political decision-making. Even when the legislature is no more than the agent of a particular stratified level of society, with the legislators bespeaking themselves as well as their class in accor- dance with its mandate, to that extent their action is bindingly representational. Similarly, the skewing of the legislature’s com- position through selection of its members by a narrowly restricted suffrage does not prevent it through political fiction from func- tioning as the representative of the entire constituency. So long as the represented endorse, accept, tolerate, or at least do not openly reject the conduct of deliberations in their name, the deci- 3 K. C. Wheare, Legislatures (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963), p. 3. 4 Inter-Parliamentary Union, Parliaments (London: Cassell and Co., Ltd., 1961), p. 116. viii Foreword sions of the legislature psychologically are theirs and this in turn legitimizes the legislature’s actions. The King’s Curia becomes a nascent legislature when to its membership are added those who are recognized spokesmen for the views of others beside the King. Even in the absence of all powers of initiation, a pro forma concurrence with an executive-determined program in no way pre- cludes a legislative body possessed of representative character from sanctioning the proposed course of action. Representation is not confined to the legislative institution. In view of the manner in which constituencies are geographically con- torted, fields of candidates partisanly narrowed, and the psycholog- ical processes of identification cultivated by modern mass media techniques, on the American scene many constituents may consider the elected chief executive to mirror the views they hold more aptly than do the members of the legislature. However, this constitutes more a dissatisfaction with the style and product of representation than a transference of the basic acceptance of the legislature as the prime representative institution. Not even in the new American state constitutions does the elected chief executive participate in the most fundamental of law-making functions performed by the legislature, the enactment of constituent legislation; and in the case of the United States constitution itself, there has not been any effort to modify the sharing in the task by legislatures on two levels of gov- ernment, to the exclusion of the executive. The other distinguishing characteristic of the legislative institu- tion is its collegial nature and the attendant processes it observes. The legislature’s structuring reflects its group character by the minimizing of formal hierarchy and the wide internal dispersal of power. In the parliamentary system of government, legislative direction rests in a committee, while Mr. Speaker ought more fit- tingly be referred to as umpire than as the spokesman his title implies. But whether adopting the British or the American pat- tern of leadership, the legislature meets collectively and moves to collective decision, be this by simple majority, extraordinary ma- jority, or through consensus to unanimity. When not acting as a body, the legislature typically utilizes smaller groups rather than individuals to further its functions. Committees screen and refine legislative proposals, or at least the latter; when it becomes nec- essary to reconcile policy differences between the two houses of a bicameral legislature, a conference committee serves the purpose. Duties associated with the administration of the legislature are as- ix signed to accounts committees, rules committees, and a host of other sub-collegial bodies. Delegation is to groups, specialization is formalized through groups, and the individual legislator shapes his conduct accordingly. The member unobservant or defiant of legislative norms soon finds himself subjected to group sanctions and, if the degree of his flaunting warrants, formal censure and expulsion expressed through vote of the legislature. In short, to the extent that all institutional effort embodies both individual and collective aspects, the legislature in its process emphasizes the collegial. It is against this backdrop of the universal nature of the legisla- tive institution5 that the legislatures of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands may be identified and the development of the leg- islative process delineated. 5 For a more complete
Recommended publications
  • "Higher" Form of Truth in The
    26 AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST [52,1950 According to the psychocultural thesis here submitted, myth varies with LITHI AND THE OUTER NATIVE WORLD* the historical stages of cultural thought, but the process of myth-making does not die a natural death with the emergence of critical, scientific thought. Each By WILLIAM A. LF6'$1\ epoch has its own type of myth and the age of science has inevitably produced LITHI occupies a significant and strategic place in the rel<, its own secular myths of rationalization. We must reckon with the fact that .-< which exist among the natives of the West Caroline Islands,'l'tions _rly cultural progress is not inevitable, and that rational thought has,proved itself ,ie<a'rea under the domination of Yap. It is the purpose of this papeoAicuWam­ quite capable of undermining its own foundations by espousing myth as a '~ethe manner in which the various islands and atolls are structun(Jiy~linked "higher" form of truth in the interests of national solidarity23 and by reducing p::.?ueanother, as well as to scan the more distant horizons of the native world all cultural ideologies to the level of fictions. Normative, critical, scientific iPown to ffiithians. thought provides the only tested means of combatting the growth of myth, External relations between Ulithi and certain islands stretching from Yap but it may do so only on condition that it retains its own integrity, and does ~!~ost to Truk are determined by political, kinship, and religious factors. not mistake reason for rationalization. !litically, the atoll is subordinate to Yap, on the west, but superior to THE VIKING FUND oleai"-the name which the people of Ulithi apply to the string of islands NEW YORK CITY ween them and Truk, on the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (332Kb)
    * **** * * * **** PALAU - EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2007 JOINT ANNUAL REPORT 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Republic of Palau is one of the wealthiest Pacific Island Nations with a gross domestic product per capita of nearly $8,000. It is also the biggest per capita aid recipient in the region due to its close association with the United States. Significant funds are provided through the Compact of Free Association between the two countries. These funds are predominately used to develop infrastructure to facilitate Palau's economic growth. The 9th EDF CSP/NIP provides an indicative financial allocation of € 2 m for the "A" Envelope, and € 0.6 m for the "B" envelope. The renewable energy focal sector, accounts for I 00% of the A envelope M €1. 7 million implemented through a multi-country programme (REPS) and €0.3 million through a Non-State actor's programme. The entire 'B' envelope has been allocated to Disaster Risk Reduction and will be implemented using a multi-country programme approach managed by SOPAC. The status of projects by the end of2007 is as follows: REPS programme: A tender for the supply and installation of equipment was launched mid- 2007 with a contract awarded shortly thereafter. Equipment supply and installation are expected Q2 2008. NSA Programme: The programme aims to enhance and expand community-based activities in the field of renewable energy. A proposal was formulated in 2006 and a Financing Agreement was signed in June 2007. The programme is implemented by way of a 'grant agreement' by the Palau Community Action Agency. Disaster Risk Reduction Programme ('B' envelope): The Financing Agreement for the project was signed in Tonga in October 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascertain Which Aspects of the Aboriginal Belief Structure, As 2) An
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 066 365 SO 002 935 AUTHOR Mitchell, Roger E. TITLE Oral Traditions of Micronesians as an Index to Culture Change Reflected in Micronesian College Graduates. Final Report. INSTITUTION Wisconsin State Univ.,Eau Claire. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Bureau of Research. BUREAU NO BR-O-E-162 PUB DATE 1 Mar 72 GRANT OEG-5-71-0007-509 NOTE 27p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0 .65 BC-$3. 29 DESCRIPTORS *Acculturation; Biculturalism; *College Students; Cultural Background; Cultural Differences; *Cultural Factors; *Folk Culture; Interviews; *Oral Communication; Values IDENTIFIERS *Micronesians ABSTRACT The study on which this final report is based focused on selected Micronesian students at the University of Guam who, after receiving their degrees, will return to their home islands to assume positions requiring them to function as intermediaries between the American and Micronesian approaches of life. Interviews with these students and with less-educated fellow islanders were taped to: 1) ascertain which aspects of the aboriginal belief structure, as preserved in oral tradition, have been most resistant to change; and, 2) an attempt to establish if the students are fairly representative of their traditional belief and value system despite their American-sponsored educations. Some of the findings were: that student belief in, and knowledge of the old mythological and cosmological constructs was generally low; that belief was high in magic, native medicine, and spirits; and that young and old alike were receptive to attempts at cultural preservations. The report contains a summary of the study, a discussion of study background, a description of methods used in collection of the folktales, analyses of the oral traditions, 16 references, and a bibliography containing over 100 entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Development Project
    Project Number: 49450-023 November 2019 Pacific Renewable Energy Investment Facility Federated States of Micronesia: Renewable Energy Development Project This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS The currency unit of the Federated States of Micronesia is the United States dollar. ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BESS – battery energy storage system COFA – Compact of Free Association DOFA – Department of Finance and Administration DORD – Department of Resources and Development EIRR – economic internal rate of return FMR – Financial Management Regulations FSM – Federated States of Micronesia GDP – gross domestic product GHG – greenhouse gas GWh – gigawatt-hour KUA – Kosrae Utilities Authority kW – kilowatt kWh – kilowatt-hour MW – megawatt O&M – operation and maintenance PAM – project administration manual PIC – project implementation consultant PUC – Pohnpei Utilities Corporation TA – technical assistance YSPSC – Yap State Public Service Corporation NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated. Vice-President Ahmed M. Saeed, Operations 2 Director General Ma. Carmela D. Locsin, Pacific Department (PARD) Director Olly Norojono, Energy Division, PARD Team leader J. Michael Trainor, Energy Specialist, PARD Team members Tahmeen Ahmad, Financial Management Specialist, Procurement, Portfolio, and Financial Management Department (PPFD) Taniela Faletau, Safeguards Specialist, PARD Eric Gagnon, Principal Procurement Specialist,
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Project/Programme Funding from the Adaptation Fund
    REQUEST FOR PROJECT/PROGRAMME FUNDING FROM THE ADAPTATION FUND The annexed form should be completed and transmitted to the Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat by email or fax. Please type in the responses using the template provided. The instructions attached to the form provide guidance to filling out the template. Please note that a project/programme must be fully prepared (i.e., fully appraised for feasibility) when the request is submitted. The final project/programme document resulting from the appraisal process should be attached to this request for funding. Complete documentation should be sent to: The Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat 1818 H Street NW MSN P4-400 Washington, D.C., 20433 U.S.A Fax: +1 (202) 522-3240/5 Email: [email protected] 1 CONTENTS Contents ........................................................................................................................... 2 PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................. 5 Project / Programme Background and Context ......................................................................... 6 National and Local Level Context .......................................................................................... 6 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................... 6 Political and Legislative ...................................................................................................... 8 Institutional Arrangements for Climate
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Country Review
    Palau 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 3 Palau 4 Pacific Islands 5 Chapter 2 7 Political Overview 7 History 8 Political Conditions 9 Political Risk Index 16 Political Stability 31 Freedom Rankings 46 Human Rights 58 Government Functions 60 Government Structure 61 Principal Government Officials 65 Leader Biography 67 Leader Biography 67 Foreign Relations 68 National Security 72 Defense Forces 73 Chapter 3 75 Economic Overview 75 Economic Overview 76 Nominal GDP and Components 77 Population and GDP Per Capita 79 Real GDP and Inflation 80 Government Spending and Taxation 81 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 82 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 83 Data in US Dollars 84 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 85 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 86 World Energy Price Summary 87 CO2 Emissions 88 Agriculture Consumption and Production 89 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 91 Metals Consumption and Production 92 World Metals Pricing Summary 94 Economic Performance Index 95 Chapter 4 107 Investment Overview 107 Foreign Investment Climate 108 Foreign Investment Index 110 Corruption Perceptions Index 123 Competitiveness Ranking 135 Taxation 144 Stock Market 144 Partner Links 144 Chapter 5 146 Social Overview 146 People 147 Human Development Index 148 Life Satisfaction Index 151 Happy Planet Index 163 Status of Women 172 Global Gender Gap Index 174 Culture and Arts 184 Etiquette 185 Travel Information 185 Diseases/Health Data 194 Chapter 6 199 Environmental Overview 199 Environmental Issues 200 Environmental Policy 202 Greenhouse Gas Ranking 203 Global Environmental Snapshot 214 Global Environmental Concepts 225 International Environmental Agreements and Associations 240 Appendices 264 Bibliography 265 Palau Chapter 1 Country Overview Palau Review 2016 Page 1 of 277 pages Palau Country Overview PALAU Palau is an island nation in the North Pacific Ocean, southeast of the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Nautical Cartography and Traditional Navigation in Oceania
    13 · Nautical Cartography and Traditional Navigation in Oceania BEN FINNEY MENTAL CARTOGRAPHY formal images and their own sense perceptions to guide their canoes over the ocean. The navigational practices of Oceanians present some­ The idea of physically portraying their mental images what of a puzzle to the student of the history of carto­ was not alien to these specialists, however. Early Western graphy. Here were superb navigators who sailed their ca­ explorers and missionaries recorded instances of how in­ noes from island to island, spending days or sometimes digenous navigators, when questioned about the islands many weeks out of sight of land, and who found their surrounding their own, readily produced maps by tracing way without consulting any instruments or charts at sea. lines in the sand or arranging pieces of coral. Some of Instead, they carried in their head images of the spread of these early visitors drew up charts based on such ephem­ islands over the ocean and envisioned in the mind's eye eral maps or from information their informants supplied the bearings from one to the other in terms of a con­ by word and gesture on the bearing and distance to the ceptual compass whose points were typically delineated islands they knew. according to the rising and setting of key stars and con­ Furthermore, on some islands master navigators taught stellations or the directions from which named winds their pupils a conceptual "star compass" by laying out blow. Within this mental framework of islands and bear­ coral fragments to signify the rising and setting points of ings, to guide their canoes to destinations lying over the key stars and constellations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbons V. Etpison, 4 ROP Intrm. 1 (1993) IBEDUL YUTAKA M
    Gibbons v. Etpison, 4 ROP Intrm. 1 (1993) IBEDUL YUTAKA M. GIBBONS, et al., Appellants, v. NGIRATKEL ETPISON, et al., and PETITIONERS FRED SKEBONG, et al., Appellees. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 19-92 & 4-93 Supreme Court, Appellate Division Republic of Palau Opinion Decided: October 29, 1993 Attorneys for Appellants: Yukiwo P. Dengokl Ngiraikelau, Dengokl, Ridpath & Ragle Anne E. Simon & Sarita E. Rios Center for Constitutional Rights Attorney for Etpison, et al: Jon Hinck, Assistant Attorney General Attorney for Skebong, et al: John K. Rechucher BEFORE: JEFFREY L. BEATTIE, Associate Justice; LARRY W. MILLER, Associate Justice; EDWARD C. KING, Part-Time Associate Justice PER CURIAM: On November 4, 1992, a ballot initiative was held in which the citizens of Palau, by a 62% majority vote, approved an amendment to the Constitution of the Republic of Palau. The amendment is designed to eliminate the requirement that, due to the constitutional restrictions on nuclear weapons and materials in Palau, the Compact of Free Association must be approved by a super-majority of 75% rather than a simple majority of votes cast in a ⊥2 nationwide referendum. In this appeal we are asked to declare the 62% vote null and void. For the reasons stated herein, we find no grounds to undo at the courthouse what the people of Palau have done at the voting booth. In these consolidated appeals plaintiffs below appeal several trial court holdings, namely, that the constitutional provision establishing amendment by popular initiative is self -executing, that the Election Commission properly verified the petition calling for the initiative, that the language of the ballot measure accurately informed the voters of its intended effect, and that the Political Education Committee fulfilled its statutory mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 115/Friday, June 14
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2002 / Notices 40929 Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant also be limited to 75 percent of the total Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) Program.) eligible costs. 646–2705 or [email protected]. Further, you are authorized to make Joe M. Allbaugh, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice Director. changes to this declaration to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act. of a major disaster declaration for the [FR Doc. 02–15048 Filed 6–13–02; 8:45 am] State of Missouri is hereby amended to BILLING CODE 6718–02–P Notice is hereby given that pursuant include the following areas among those to the authority vested in the Director of areas determined to have been adversely the Federal Emergency Management affected by the catastrophe declared a FEDERAL EMERGENCY Agency under Executive Order 12148, I major disaster by the President in his MANAGEMENT AGENCY hereby appoint William L. Carwile III of declaration of May 6, 2002: the Federal Emergency Management [FEMA–1417–DR] Cedar, Crawford, Laclede, McDonald, Agency to act as the Federal Oregon, Ozark, Shannon, Ste. Genevieve, Federated States of Micronesia; Major Coordinating Officer for this declared Stone, Vernon, and Wright Counties for Disaster and Related Determinations disaster. Public Assistance (already designated for I do hereby determine the following Individual Assistance). AGENCY: Federal Emergency areas of the Federated States of Dekalb, Lincoln, Maries, Marion, Miller, Management Agency (FEMA). Micronesia to have been affected Osage, Phelps, Pike, Pulaski, Ralls, and Ray ACTION: Notice. adversely by this declared major Counties for Public Assistance. disaster: (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Yap State for Public Assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 75/Monday, April 20, 1998/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 75 / Monday, April 20, 1998 / Notices 19493 Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Agency under Executive Order 12148, I Management Agency, Washington, DC Program.) hereby appoint William L. Carwile, III of 20472, (202) 646±3260. Lacy E. Suiter, the Federal Emergency Management SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice Executive Associate Director, Response and Agency to act as the Federal of a major disaster for the State of Recovery Directorate. Coordinating Officer for this declared Minnesota is hereby amended to [FR Doc. 98±10338 Filed 4±17±98; 8:45 am] disaster. include the following areas among those BILLING CODE 6718±02±P I do hereby determine the following areas determined to have been adversely areas of the Federated States of affected by the catastrophe declared a Micronesia to have been affected major disaster by the President in his FEDERAL EMERGENCY adversely by this declared major declaration of April 1, 1998: MANAGEMENT AGENCY disaster: The counties of Blue Earth and Nobles for [FEMA±1213±DR] Emergency protective measures (Category Individual Assistance. B) for the following areas: (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Federated States of Micronesia; Major In the State of Yap: Eauripik, Elato, Fais, Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used Disaster and Related Determinations Faraulap, Ifalik, Lamotrek, Ngulu, Satawal, for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Ulithi, Wolei, and Yap Proper. In the State Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora AGENCY: Federal Emergency of Chuuk: Eot, Ettal, Fanapanges, Fefen, Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Management Agency (FEMA). Fonanu, Fono, Houk, Kuttu, Lekinioch, Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services ACTION: Notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Trusteeship Council to Extend an Invitation to My Delegation Under the Terms
    UNITED NATIONS Distr. TRUSTEESHIP GENERAL T/PV.1611 COUNCIL 4 June 1986 ENGLISH Fifty-third Session VERBATIM RECX>RD OF THE SIXTEEN HUNDRED AND ELEVENTH MEETING Held at United Nations Headquarters, New York, on Tuesday, 20 May 1986, at 3 p.m. President: Mr. RAPIN (France) - Organization of work - Examination of the annual report of the Administering Authority for the year ended 30 September 1985: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (continued) - The future of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (continued) .- Report of the United Nations Visiting Mission to the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, 1985 Report of the United Nations Visiting Mission to Observe the Plebiscite in Palau, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, February 1986 This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be submitted in one of the working languages, preferably in the same language as the text to which they refer. They should be set forth in a memorandum and also, if possible, incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within one week of the date of this document to the Chief, Official Records Editing Section, Department of Conference Services, room c-:::2-750, 2 United Nations Plaza, and incorporated in a copy of the record. Any corrections to the records of the meetings of this session will be consolidated in a single corrigendum, to be issued shortly after the end of the session. 86-60614 8702V (E) JP/CW T/PV.1611 2 The meeting was called to order at 3.55 p.m. ORGANIZATION OF WORK The PRESIDENT (interpretation from French): At our first meeting the delegation of the Soviet Union requested that the documents mentioned in annex II to the Visiting Mission's report (T/1878) be translated into Russian and then distributed as official documents of the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Benthic Algae of the Caroline Islands, I. Introduction, Chlorophyta, and Cyanophyta1
    The Marine Benthic Algae of the Caroline Islands, I. Introduction, Chlorophyta, and Cyanophyta1 Gavino C. TRONO, JR. Department of Botany, College of Arts and Sciences University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines Introduction T he Caroline Islands are largely a group of atolls located between 131 ° and 164° East Longitude and 2° to 10° North Latitude. Most of the islands are low islands or coral atolls, but the islands of Kusaie, Ponape, Truk, and Palau are high islands of volcanic origin while Yap is of uplifted sedimentary origin. Those lying east of 148° East Longitude comprise the Eastern Caroline Islands, while those west of this meridian comprise the Western Caroline Islands. Together they constitute much of Micronesia. The Caroline Islands (Pl. 1) form a chain roughly parallel to and just above the equator. The chain is flanked at its eastern end by the Marshall and Gilbert Islands, southward by several island groups comprising Melanesia, and westward by the Philippine Islands. The earliest known records of the marine benthic algae from the Caroline Islands are those of Reinbold (1901) based on the materials collected by Dr. Volkens from the island of Yap. Except for those published by Schmidt in 1928, most ,of the records from 1904 to 1944 were contributed by Japanese phycologists. The first Japanese phycologist to contribute to the knowledge of the algae ,of Micronesia was Okamura (1904), who enumerated 82 species from the Caroline lslands and Australia of which 26 species were from Palau and Yap Islands. The materials were collected and sent to him by S. Abe.
    [Show full text]