Lateral Transfer of Eukaryotic Ribosomal RNA Genes: an Emerging Concern for Molecular Ecology of Microbial Eukaryotes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(Alveolata) As Inferred from Hsp90 and Actin Phylogenies1
J. Phycol. 40, 341–350 (2004) r 2004 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03129.x EARLY EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF DINOFLAGELLATES AND APICOMPLEXANS (ALVEOLATA) AS INFERRED FROM HSP90 AND ACTIN PHYLOGENIES1 Brian S. Leander2 and Patrick J. Keeling Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Evolutionary Biology, Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Three extremely diverse groups of unicellular The Alveolata is one of the most biologically diverse eukaryotes comprise the Alveolata: ciliates, dino- supergroups of eukaryotic microorganisms, consisting flagellates, and apicomplexans. The vast phenotypic of ciliates, dinoflagellates, apicomplexans, and several distances between the three groups along with the minor lineages. Although molecular phylogenies un- enigmatic distribution of plastids and the economic equivocally support the monophyly of alveolates, and medical importance of several representative members of the group share only a few derived species (e.g. Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, Perkinsus, and morphological features, such as distinctive patterns of Pfiesteria) have stimulated a great deal of specula- cortical vesicles (syn. alveoli or amphiesmal vesicles) tion on the early evolutionary history of alveolates. subtending the plasma membrane and presumptive A robust phylogenetic framework for alveolate pinocytotic structures, called ‘‘micropores’’ (Cavalier- diversity will provide the context necessary for Smith 1993, Siddall et al. 1997, Patterson -
The Stem Cell Revolution Revealing Protozoan Parasites' Secrets And
Review The Stem Cell Revolution Revealing Protozoan Parasites’ Secrets and Paving the Way towards Vaccine Development Alena Pance The Wellcome Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK; [email protected] Abstract: Protozoan infections are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in humans and some of the most important neglected diseases in the world. Despite relentless efforts devoted to vaccine and drug development, adequate tools to treat and prevent most of these diseases are still lacking. One of the greatest hurdles is the lack of understanding of host–parasite interactions. This gap in our knowledge comes from the fact that these parasites have complex life cycles, during which they infect a variety of specific cell types that are difficult to access or model in vitro. Even in those cases when host cells are readily available, these are generally terminally differentiated and difficult or impossible to manipulate genetically, which prevents assessing the role of human factors in these diseases. The advent of stem cell technology has opened exciting new possibilities to advance our knowledge in this field. The capacity to culture Embryonic Stem Cells, derive Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from people and the development of protocols for differentiation into an ever-increasing variety of cell types and organoids, together with advances in genome editing, represent a huge resource to finally crack the mysteries protozoan parasites hold and unveil novel targets for prevention and treatment. Keywords: protozoan parasites; stem cells; induced pluripotent stem cells; organoids; vaccines; treatments Citation: Pance, A. The Stem Cell Revolution Revealing Protozoan 1. Introduction Parasites’ Secrets and Paving the Way towards Vaccine Development. -
New Phylogenomic Analysis of the Enigmatic Phylum Telonemia Further Resolves the Eukaryote Tree of Life
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/403329; this version posted August 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum Telonemia further resolves the eukaryote tree of life Jürgen F. H. Strassert1, Mahwash Jamy1, Alexander P. Mylnikov2, Denis V. Tikhonenkov2, Fabien Burki1,* 1Department of Organismal Biology, Program in Systematic Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Yaroslavl Region, Russia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: TSAR, Telonemia, phylogenomics, eukaryotes, tree of life, protists bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/403329; this version posted August 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract The broad-scale tree of eukaryotes is constantly improving, but the evolutionary origin of several major groups remains unknown. Resolving the phylogenetic position of these ‘orphan’ groups is important, especially those that originated early in evolution, because they represent missing evolutionary links between established groups. Telonemia is one such orphan taxon for which little is known. The group is composed of molecularly diverse biflagellated protists, often prevalent although not abundant in aquatic environments. -
Ellobiopsids of the Genus Thalassomyces Are Alveolates
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 51(2), 2004 pp. 246±252 q 2004 by the Society of Protozoologists Ellobiopsids of the Genus Thalassomyces are Alveolates JEFFREY D. SILBERMAN,a,b1 ALLEN G. COLLINS,c,2 LISA-ANN GERSHWIN,d,3 PATRICIA J. JOHNSONa and ANDREW J. ROGERe aDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California at Los Angeles, California, USA, and bInstitute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California at Los Angeles, California, USA, and cEcology, Behavior and Evolution Section, Division of Biology, University of California, La Jolla, California, USA, and dDepartment of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA, and eCanadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Evolutionary Biology, Genome Atlantic, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ABSTRACT. Ellobiopsids are multinucleate protist parasites of aquatic crustaceans that possess a nutrient absorbing `root' inside the host and reproductive structures that protrude through the carapace. Ellobiopsids have variously been af®liated with fungi, `colorless algae', and dino¯agellates, although no morphological character has been identi®ed that de®nitively allies them with any particular eukaryotic lineage. The arrangement of the trailing and circumferential ¯agella of the rarely observed bi-¯agellated `zoospore' is reminiscent of dino¯agellate ¯agellation, but a well-organized `dinokaryotic nucleus' has never been observed. Using small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences from two species of Thalassomyces, phylogenetic analyses robustly place these ellobiopsid species among the alveolates (ciliates, apicomplexans, dino¯agellates and relatives) though without a clear af®liation to any established alveolate lineage. Our trees demonstrate that Thalassomyces fall within a dino¯agellate 1 apicomplexa 1 Perkinsidae 1 ``marine alveolate group 1'' clade, clustering most closely with dino¯agellates. -
Genetic Diversity and Habitats of Two Enigmatic Marine Alveolate Lineages
AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Vol. 42: 277–291, 2006 Published March 29 Aquat Microb Ecol Genetic diversity and habitats of two enigmatic marine alveolate lineages Agnès Groisillier1, Ramon Massana2, Klaus Valentin3, Daniel Vaulot1, Laure Guillou1,* 1Station Biologique, UMR 7144, CNRS, and Université Pierre & Marie Curie, BP74, 29682 Roscoff Cedex, France 2Department de Biologia Marina i Oceanografia, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CMIMA, CSIC. Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 3Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany ABSTRACT: Systematic sequencing of environmental SSU rDNA genes amplified from different marine ecosystems has uncovered novel eukaryotic lineages, in particular within the alveolate and stramenopile radiations. The ecological and geographic distribution of 2 novel alveolate lineages (called Group I and II in previous papers) is inferred from the analysis of 62 different environmental clone libraries from freshwater and marine habitats. These 2 lineages have been, up to now, retrieved exclusively from marine ecosystems, including oceanic and coastal waters, sediments, hydrothermal vents, and perma- nent anoxic deep waters and usually represent the most abundant eukaryotic lineages in environmen- tal genetic libraries. While Group I is only composed of environmental sequences (118 clones), Group II contains, besides environmental sequences (158 clones), sequences from described genera (8) (Hema- todinium and Amoebophrya) that belong to the Syndiniales, an atypical order of dinoflagellates exclu- sively composed of marine parasites. This suggests that Group II could correspond to Syndiniales, al- though this should be confirmed in the future by examining the morphology of cells from Group II. Group II appears to be abundant in coastal and oceanic ecosystems, whereas permanent anoxic waters and hy- drothermal ecosystems are usually dominated by Group I. -
Phylogenomic Analyses Support the Monophyly of Excavata and Resolve Relationships Among Eukaryotic ‘‘Supergroups’’
Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic ‘‘supergroups’’ Vladimir Hampla,b,c, Laura Huga, Jessica W. Leigha, Joel B. Dacksd,e, B. Franz Langf, Alastair G. B. Simpsonb, and Andrew J. Rogera,1 aDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 1X5; bDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4J1; cDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic; dDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, United Kingdom; eDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2H7; and fDepartement de Biochimie, Universite´de Montre´al, Montre´al, QC, Canada H3T 1J4 Edited by Jeffrey D. Palmer, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, and approved January 22, 2009 (received for review August 12, 2008) Nearly all of eukaryotic diversity has been classified into 6 strong support for an incorrect phylogeny (16, 19, 24). Some recent suprakingdom-level groups (supergroups) based on molecular and analyses employ objective data filtering approaches that isolate and morphological/cell-biological evidence; these are Opisthokonta, remove the sites or taxa that contribute most to these systematic Amoebozoa, Archaeplastida, Rhizaria, Chromalveolata, and Exca- errors (19, 24). vata. However, molecular phylogeny has not provided clear evi- The prevailing model of eukaryotic phylogeny posits 6 major dence that either Chromalveolata or Excavata is monophyletic, nor supergroups (25–28): Opisthokonta, Amoebozoa, Archaeplastida, has it resolved the relationships among the supergroups. To Rhizaria, Chromalveolata, and Excavata. With some caveats, solid establish the affinities of Excavata, which contains parasites of molecular phylogenetic evidence supports the monophyly of each of global importance and organisms regarded previously as primitive Rhizaria, Archaeplastida, Opisthokonta, and Amoebozoa (16, 18, eukaryotes, we conducted a phylogenomic analysis of a dataset of 29–34). -
Inferring Ancestry
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1176 Inferring Ancestry Mitochondrial Origins and Other Deep Branches in the Eukaryote Tree of Life DING HE ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-554-9031-7 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-231670 2014 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Fries salen, Evolutionsbiologiskt centrum, Norbyvägen 18, 752 36, Uppsala, Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:30 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Andrew Roger (Dalhousie University). Abstract He, D. 2014. Inferring Ancestry. Mitochondrial Origins and Other Deep Branches in the Eukaryote Tree of Life. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1176. 48 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9031-7. There are ~12 supergroups of complex-celled organisms (eukaryotes), but relationships among them (including the root) remain elusive. For Paper I, I developed a dataset of 37 eukaryotic proteins of bacterial origin (euBac), representing the conservative protein core of the proto- mitochondrion. This gives a relatively short distance between ingroup (eukaryotes) and outgroup (mitochondrial progenitor), which is important for accurate rooting. The resulting phylogeny reconstructs three eukaryote megagroups and places one, Discoba (Excavata), as sister group to the other two (neozoa). This rejects the reigning “Unikont-Bikont” root and highlights the evolutionary importance of Excavata. For Paper II, I developed a 150-gene dataset to test relationships in supergroup SAR (Stramenopila, Alveolata, Rhizaria). Analyses of all 150-genes give different trees with different methods, but also reveal artifactual signal due to extremely long rhizarian branches and illegitimate sequences due to horizontal gene transfer (HGT) or contamination. -
The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
The ISME Journal (2020) 14:544–559 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0542-5 ARTICLE The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? 1 1 1 1 Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo ● Andreas Evenstad ● Line Lieblein Røsæg ● Anders K. Krabberød ● Ramiro Logares 1,2 Received: 14 May 2019 / Revised: 17 September 2019 / Accepted: 24 September 2019 / Published online: 4 November 2019 © The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, but our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years. All major protistan lineages were involved in interactions as hosts, symbionts (mutualists and commensalists), parasites, predators, and/or prey. Predation was the most common interaction (39% of all records), followed by symbiosis (29%), parasitism (18%), and ‘unresolved interactions’ fi 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: (14%, where it is uncertain whether the interaction is bene cial or antagonistic). Using bipartite networks, we found that protist predators seem to be ‘multivorous’ while parasite–host and symbiont–host interactions appear to have moderate degrees of specialization. The SAR supergroup (i.e., Stramenopiles, Alveolata, and Rhizaria) heavily dominated PIDA, and comparisons against a global-ocean molecular survey (TARA Oceans) indicated that several SAR lineages, which are abundant and diverse in the marine realm, were underrepresented among the recorded interactions. -
Phylogenomic Evidence Supports Past Endosymbiosis, Intracellular And
Open Access Research2004HuangetVolume al. 5, Issue 11, Article R88 Phylogenomic evidence supports past endosymbiosis, comment intracellular and horizontal gene transfer in Cryptosporidium parvum Jinling Huang*, Nandita Mullapudi†, Cheryl A Lancto‡, Marla Scott*, Mitchell S Abrahamsen‡ and Jessica C Kissinger*† Addresses: *Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. †Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. ‡Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA. reviews Correspondence: Jessica C Kissinger. E-mail: [email protected] Published: 19 October 2004 Received: 19 April 2004 Revised: 16 August 2004 Genome Biology 2004, 5:R88 Accepted: 10 September 2004 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2004/5/11/R88 reports © 2004 Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Phylogenomic<p>CryptosporidiumGenestheirgenome phylogenetic transferred has changed evidence fromdistance the is thedistantsupports genetic recipientor the phylogenetic andpast lack ofmetabolic endosymbiosisof a largehomologs sources, number repertoire in suchandthe of transfer hostintracellularof as the eu. Thebacteria, parasite.</p>red successful genes, and may horizontalmany beintegration potentialof which gene andareparasite transfer not expression shared targets in Cryptosporidium by of for other the therapeutic transferred apicomplexan parvum drug geness parasites. owing in this to deposited research Abstract Background: The apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum is an emerging pathogen capable of causing illness in humans and other animals and death in immunocompromised individuals. -
MAPK2 Is a Conserved Alveolate MAPK Required for Toxoplasma Cell Cycle Progression
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.13.095091; this version posted May 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. MAPK2 is a conserved Alveolate MAPK required for Toxoplasma cell cycle progression Xiaoyu Hua, William J. O'Shaughnessya, Tsebaot G. Berakia, Michael L. Reesea,b,# 5 aDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9041, USA bDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9041, USA 10 Running title: TgMAPK2 regulates centrosome duplication checkpoint #Address correspondence to Michael L. Reese, [email protected] 15 ORCIDs: Michael Reese: 0000-0001-9401-9594 20 Keywords: kinase, cell cycle, centrosome, organelles 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.13.095091; this version posted May 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are a conserved family of protein kinases that 25 regulate signal transduction, proliferation, and development throughout eukaryotes. The Apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii expresses three MAPKs. Two of these, ERK7 and MAPKL1, have been respectively implicated in the regulation of conoid biogenesis and centrosome duplication. The third kinase, MAPK2, is specific to and conserved throughout Alveolata, though its function is unknown. -
Dinoflagellate Life-Cycle Complexities
J. Phycol. 38, 417–419 (2002) DINOFLAGELLATE LIFE-CYCLE COMPLEXITIES The dinoflagellates are a group of predominately pseudopodial network illustrated by Hofender (1930) marine, alveolate protists whose structural organiza- as an anastomosing feeding structure of Ceratium hi- tion, morphological diversity, and novel behaviors have rundinella is likely an artifact of cell trauma, while the captured the imaginations of phycologists and proto- juxtaposition of a small Protoperidinium within the sul- zoologists for 250 years. The 2000 or so extant species cus of Ceratium lunula, interpreted by Norris (1969) as that comprise the dinoflagellates sort almost equally evidence of feeding, may represent spurious, post- as phototrophs and heterotrophs; however, a growing mortem placement of specimens (Jacobson 1999). awareness that many species are really mixotrophic, Successful cultivation of dinoflagellates was not engaging in some combination of phototrophy and achieved until early in the twentieth century when phagotrophy, is eroding the conventional view of di- Crypthecodinium cohii was first grown on rotting pieces noflagellate nutrition (Stoecker 1999). The intricate of the brown algae Fucus (Taylor 1987). Since then, jigsaw puzzles formed by the thecal plates of armored only a small percentage of dinoflagellate species have species (Fensome et al. 1993, Steidinger and Tangen been successfully brought into culture. Most of these 1996), the complex light-sensing organelles of the War- are neritic, photosynthetic species whose growth re- nowiacids -
Toxoplasma Gondii
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2016) 129, 1031-1045 doi:10.1242/jcs.177386 RESEARCH ARTICLE Structural and functional dissection of Toxoplasma gondii armadillo repeats only protein Christina Mueller1, Atta Samoo2,3,4,*, Pierre-Mehdi Hammoudi1,*, Natacha Klages1, Juha Pekka Kallio3,4,5, Inari Kursula2,3,4,5 and Dominique Soldati-Favre1,‡ ABSTRACT specialised membranous sac termed the parasitophorous vacuole Rhoptries are club-shaped, regulated secretory organelles that membrane (PVM). Rhoptries are positioned at the apical end of the cluster at the apical pole of apicomplexan parasites. Their parasite and adopt an elongated, club-shaped morphology with a discharge is essential for invasion and the establishment of an bulbous body and a narrow neck (Dubey et al., 1998). These intracellular lifestyle. Little is known about rhoptry biogenesis and organelles play a key role not only during invasion, but also recycling during parasite division. In Toxoplasma gondii, positioning contribute to the formation of the PVM as well as subsequent of rhoptries involves the armadillo repeats only protein (ARO) and evasion and subversion of the host cell defence mechanisms myosin F (MyoF). Here, we show that two ARO partners, ARO- (reviewed in Kemp et al., 2013). During parasite entry, only one of – interacting protein (AIP) and adenylate cyclase β (ACβ) localize to a the 10 12 rhoptries injects its contents, including the rhoptry neck rhoptry subcompartment. In absence of AIP, ACβ disappears from proteins (RONs), rhoptry bulb proteins (ROPs) and some the rhoptries. By assessing the contribution of each ARO armadillo membranous materials, into the host cell (Boothroyd and (ARM) repeat, we provide evidence that ARO is multifunctional, Dubremetz, 2008).