D2.1 – Requirements and Use Cases
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vehicle-to-Vulnerable roAd user cooperaTive communication and sensing teCHnologies to imprOVE transpoRt safety D2.1 – Requirements and use cases Project contract n.: FP6-2004-IST-4 – 027014 Workpackage, workpackage title: WP2, User Requirements and Scenarios Task, task title: T2.1, User Requirements - T2.2, Scenarios, Use Cases Deliverable n.: D2.1 Document title: D2.1-Requirements and use cases Deliverable type: PUBLIC Document preparation date: 30.06.2006 Authors: A. Mousadakou (HIT), A. Guarise (CRF) Consortium: Centro Ricerche Fiat, DaimlerChrysler AG, Piaggio & C. S.p.A., Robert Bosch GmbH, MIRA Limited, Technische Universität Chemnitz, ARC Seibersdorf research GmbH, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, University of Stuttgart, Steinbeis Stiftung für Technologie Transfer, Faber Software S.r.l., LogicaCMG Nederland B.V., Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia Project co-funded by the European Commission DG-Information Society and Media in the 6th Framework Programme WATCH-OVER Project FP6-2004-IST-4 – 027014 PUBLIC D2.1-Requirements and use cases Document Control Sheet Project name: WATCH-OVER Workpackage, workpackage title: WP2, User Requirements and Scenarios Task, task title: T2.1, User Requirements - T2.2, Scenarios, Use Cases Document title: WATCH-OVER_D2.1-Requirements and use cases Main author(s): L. Andreone (CRF), E. Bekiaris (HIT), A. Guarise (CRF), A. Mousadakou (HIT) Other author(s): E. Portouli (HIT) M. Pieve, F. Galliano (PIAGGIO) K. Meinken (USTUTT) D. Gavrila (DC) Date of submission to Consortium: 11.07.2006 Date of submission to European Commission: 27.07.2006 Revision history: VERSION DATE AUTHOR SUMMARY OF CHANGES 1.0 31.05.2006 L. Andreone, A. Guarise First draft 1.1 01.06.2006 L. Andreone, A. Guarise Revision of document structure L. Andreone, E. Bekiaris, A. 2.0 05.06.2006 Guarise, A. Mousadakou, E. First input Portouli 3.0 20.06.2006 L. Andreone Revision 4.0 26.06.2006 A. Mousadakou, E. Bekiaris Second input Revision of document structure and section 2 5.0 27.06.2006 A. Guarise, A. Mousadakou and 4 and input on section 5 6.0 28.06.2006 L. Andreone Revision L. Andreone, E. Bekiaris, A. 7.0 10.07.2006 Revision of Section 4 and input on section 5 Guarise, A. Mousadakou 8.0 11.07.2006 A. Guarise Final draft version C. Ferrarini, L. Etzler, M. Pieve, F. Galliano, I. Ducci, 8.1 14.07.2006 K. Meinken, D. Gavrila, U. Revision and input Beutnagel-Buchner, A. Sikora 9.1 20.07.2006 L. Andreone, A. Guarise Final version for Peer review 10 26.07.2006 A. Guarise, A. Mousadakou Revision after Peer review report This project has been co-funded by the European Commission DG-Information Society and Media in the 6th Framework 2 Programme. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the project partners listed herein and does not necessarily represent the view of the European Commission or its services. WATCH-OVER Project FP6-2004-IST-4 – 027014 PUBLIC D2.1-Requirements and use cases List of abbreviations ABS Anti-lock braking system AG Aktiengesellschaft AMA American Motorcyclist Association AVV Adviesdienst Verkeer en Vervoer BAST Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen BIC Bicycles BMF British Motorcyclists Federation BV Besloten Vennootschap CARE Community Road Accident Database CAT Cars and trucks CBS Centraal Bureau Voor de Statistiek CRO Crossing CUR Curve DB Database EC European Commission ECMT European Conference of Ministers of Transport ETSC European Transport Safety Council EU European Union FARS Fatality Analysis Reporting System FEMA Federation of European Motorcyclists Association FIM Federation Internationale de Motocyclisme GES General Estimates System GIDAS Grafisch-Interaktives Datenanalysesystem GmbH Gesellschaft mit Beschränkter Haftung HMI Human Machine Interface HW Hardware ID Identifier IRTAD International Road Traffic and Accident Database IST Information Society Technologies ISTAT Istituto Centrale di Statistica LED Light Emitting Diode OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer OV Other Vehicle PED Pedestrian PCT Perpendicular crossing trajectories POT Parallel overtaking trajectories PTW Powered two-wheelers (motorbikes and moped) ROU Roundabout RTT Respective turning trajectories r(wg) Within-group agreement SA Situation awareness SPA Socità per azioni SQL Structured Query Language SRL Società a responsabilità limitata STR Straight road SW Software SWOV Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid Tx.y Task (number x.y ) UC Use case VRU Vulnerable road user WP x Work Package (number x) This project has been co-funded by the European Commission DG-Information Society and Media in the 6th Framework 3 Programme. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the project partners listed herein and does not necessarily represent the view of the European Commission or its services. WATCH-OVER Project FP6-2004-IST-4 – 027014 PUBLIC D2.1-Requirements and use cases Table of contents Document Control Sheet................................................................................................................... 2 List of abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... 3 Table of contents .............................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 2. Preliminary information ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Previous related projects................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1. The PROTECTOR European project ........................................................................ 8 2.1.2. The SAVE-U European project.................................................................................. 8 2.1.3. The MAIDS European project.................................................................................... 9 2.2. Review of accident data .................................................................................................. 10 2.2.1. Problem size............................................................................................................ 11 2.2.2. Pedestrians ............................................................................................................. 13 2.2.3. Bicyclists.................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.4. Powered two-wheelers ............................................................................................ 23 2.3. Initial list of scenarios ...................................................................................................... 29 2.3.1. Pedestrians ............................................................................................................. 29 2.3.2. Bicyclists.................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.3. Powered two-wheelers ............................................................................................ 33 3. Selection of Scenarios ............................................................................................................ 35 3.1. Scenarios from expert brainstorming .............................................................................. 36 3.1.1. Selection of new scenarios...................................................................................... 36 3.1.2. Prioritisation of scenarios ........................................................................................ 42 3.1.3. Identification of parameters ..................................................................................... 47 3.2. Scenarios from methodical analysis................................................................................ 49 4. User requirements................................................................................................................... 53 4.1. Questionnaire preparation............................................................................................... 54 4.2. Questionnaire results ...................................................................................................... 55 4.2.1. Respondents sample............................................................................................... 55 4.2.2. Requirements regarding system output................................................................... 58 4.2.3. Evaluation of scenarios ........................................................................................... 61 4.2.4. Suggestions from the respondents.......................................................................... 68 5. Selection of Use Cases........................................................................................................... 69 5.1. Scenarios final considerations......................................................................................... 69 5.2. Use cases description ....................................................................................................