History of Utah State Prison 1850-1952

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Utah State Prison 1850-1952 Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1952 History of Utah State Prison 1850-1952 James B. Hill Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hill, James B., "History of Utah State Prison 1850-1952" (1952). Theses and Dissertations. 4791. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4791 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. g 4 47 HISTORYOF 0 UTAH STATE PRISON 185019521850 1952 A thesis irePrepresentedseated to the faculty of the department of history brigham young university provo utah lain partial fulffulfillmentbulfillmentwillment of the requirements for the degree master of science in history 171833 by james B hill june 1952 PREFACEPHKPACE down through the ages men with the insatiable desire to know and record truths of the past have been responsible for the many historical volumes that we enjoy today only lovers of history can fully appreciate the thoughts that arise in the mind of a student of history as he stands and gazes upon relics and ruins of the past in 1943 the writer first visited the old sugarhouse prison iain salt lake city and was intrigued with the old build- ings surrounded by high stone walls two years later he stood on a smasmallsmail11 hill east of the priprisonlsonisonallsaliswailswallsw aadand beheld fforfonor the time a potters where unclaimedua bodies of inanmanyy first field the claimed i dead criminals lay buried As he walked among the crude head- stones many of which bore no identifying name he was possessed1possessed with a great desire to know the history of the prison its former employees and the men who made its co- stnstructionruction aecesaecusnecessarysarysany the real purpose of this thesis is to present a generalgeneraigenerah i history of utah state prison in order that a record of that institution may be preserved this phase of utah history has long been neglectedaegleoteds it is hoped that a contribution has also been made to a better understanding of utahs penal system in order to present the most comprehensive study of the subject the writer explorede XPlored a number of sources of iii information among the methods employed were letter writing personal interviews and library reseresearcharchearcho through letter writing several interviews were arranged that resulted in obtaining much valuable information letters were written to the national archives to tamesjames V bennett director of bureau of prisons and to senator arthur V watkins requesting their services in uncovering information on the history of the prison they were most cooperative personal interviews as a means of research proved to be very successful A list of the people interviewed is found in the bibliography the card catalogs in the libraries visited by the writer contained very few references on utah state prison thus a great deal of reading and searching through old Aiapiariesaiariesdiariesariesarlesnewspapers periodicals and history books was neces- sary to find dentpertpentpertinentineat information the writer was successful in obtaining microfilm of isevisaevseveraleralecaledal unpublished manuscripts containing much useful inform- ation on the subject from the libraries of the university of utah aandnd the university of california the writer gratefully extends his thanks to his thesis committee professors brigham DOD madsen and owen L babarnettrnett for their encouragement guidance aadand kind assistance thanks alsoaisogoes to professor it B swensen aadand other members of the history department for their part in developing the writers interest in history utah state prison guards were cooperative in giving information especially interested in seeing a history of the m iv prison written was mr ray haueter identification officer at utah state prison appreciation is kindly extended to himhimehimo the writer wishes to extend a special thanks to A michael mcgeemcg ee who loaned him a personal copy of an unpublished manuscript with valuable information on the history of utah state prison since statehood the writer owes a special debt of gratitude to the members of the staff at brigham young university library for their help and suggestions on research problems april 28 1952 brigham young university JJBHbhebho v r PABLETABLEnable OF CONTENTS page LIST OF appendices viii aistalstFISTILIST OFOT PLATES ix chapter I1 I1introductionT RODUCTION forerunnersforeyorerunners of modern prisons prison reforms in america the Pennsylvapennsylvaniaalaaiania plan the auburaauburn system the end of lathl9th19th century tactics in prisons in utah II11 JUSTICE IN EARLY UTAH 6 bishopbishops courts nonmormonnon mormoamormonmoamoa emigrants the code of the mountainsMouatmountains first executions in utah territory territorial GoveovernmentgovernmentG ramentcament in utah trouble between fefedderaldenalera judges aadand mormons AND liiIII111 0 PRISON SITES PRISONS 0 0 39 ADprovalapproval of appropriation for building a penitentiary inutahin utah territory frisonprison ready fforor use in 1841854 but not completed dilapidated condition of prison plans for a new prison on antelope island US marshal takestaileseakes possession of prison territorial territorial prisoners lived iain rented buildbuildingsings portable iron ceilscells new buildings in 1885 prison propprogpropertyerty inherited by state of utah in 1896 new ceilcellhouse and many improvementimprovementss 1917 authorization for new prison to be built at point of mountain 1937 vlvi chapter page the new prison under Constructconstructionioaionlon transfer from sugarhouseSagarsugarhouse prison to point of mountain igiigl1911951 lvaivolyaIV UTAH penitentiary BEFORE STATMOODSTATEHOOD 66 governing body of penitentiary the first wardens education of prisoners convict liborlabor escapes 5 troubles with the army and federal judges US marshal takes over utah penitentiary united statesstatos penitentiary unjust Treattreatmentmeatment of mormons polygamist in the penitentiary penal practice of united states penitentiary 7 UTAH staesSTATSSTATE PRISON SINCESINGE STATEHSTATEHOODOOD 99 utah state inherits united states penitentiary property governing officials of utah state prison wardenswa rd ens rules escapes riots work projects female prisoners rehabilitation religious activities prison school paroles and probations finances bibliography1 134 PPENDIOESiappskdioes 140 i LATESPLATES 149 vii appendices appendixAppeadix page A executions during territorial days and since statehood 141 boB A record of the prisoners received and discharged at utah penitentiary fronfrom 1851855 to 1878 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 145 CG financial report on utah penitentiary 186418751864 1875 146 doD record of prisoners 189619501896 1950 147 viii LIST OF elatesPLATSSPLATES page tlatealateplate Iib1 figfigs 1 utah territorial peniteritiapenitentiaryry 1880 150 figig 2 administrative building of the old sugarhouse prison 1945 II11 john leighty aadand family1899family 1899 leighty was serving time fforfonor polygamy 0 0 0 0 0 151 iliillIII111 methods of treatment of incorrigibles at utah state prison these methods of punishment were abandoned a number of years ago 9 0 0 0 152 fige 1lo10 inside view of a discipline cell for incorrigibles this cell was located in the basement of number three cell block at the old sugar- house prison fibfig 2 two views of the hole 11 a cell used for solitaryconfiaementsolitary confinement of incorrigibles it was located in the prison yard between the machine shop au two and numbernumber1 abermber ceileeliblock of the old sugarhousesugarsugani house prison IV figefigo 1 viewlookingview looking east along the north wall of the old sugarhouse prison the view reveals a portion of number one celloell block 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 fig 2 west wagon gate eatrancetraneeentrance to the old sugarhouse prison fig 3 sugarhouse prison potterfield it lies just southeast of the east waliwallwailwaliewallo VsV figrigfige I1 improvised hook used by convicts in their attempt to escape over the wall of the old sugarhouse prison 193219320 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 fig 2 HEL jorgenson prison guard search- ingaing a dradrainageinage culvert near vicinity of sugarhouse prison for an escaped convict 1940 ix plate page VI old sugarhouse prison in process of bebeingiag torn down 155 figpig 1 view of number two cell block and yard figfigtfeigt 2 minimum security cell block on the left and maximum caritysecuritysieSve cell block on the right fig 3 the building iain the foreground was used by the old sugarhouse prison as a barber shop shoe repair shop and laundry VII figitigt 1 view of the prison ffarllfarlafariaarnarm and the new state frprisonisonlson 0 0 156 fig 2v2av view of the new utah state prprison3 son looking west from highway 91 figig 3 view of a cell in the new state prison z CHAPTER I1 introduction the term prisons as used in this thesis refers to institutions built for the express purpose of housing offenders committed by due process of law the forerunners of modern prisons were the workhouseworkhousess2sa wwhich bebegangan to appear toward the last of the lathl6th16th centarycentury in europe the workhouses were used not to imprison feloaceloafelonss but to incarcerate debtors vagrants and hauperspauperspaupers
Recommended publications
  • Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad Christopher Q
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 2003 Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad Christopher Q. Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons How does access to this work benefit oy u? Let us know! Recommended Citation Christopher Q. Culter, Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad, 50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 335 (2002-2003) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTHING LESS THAN THE DIGNITY OF MAN: EVOLVING STANDARDS, BOTCHED EXECUTIONS AND UTAH’S CONTROVERSIAL USE OF THE FIRING SQUAD CHRISTOPHER Q. CUTLER1 Human justice is sadly lacking in consolation; it can only shed blood for blood. But we mustn’t ask that it do more than it can.2 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 336 II. HISTORICAL USE OF UTAH’S FIRING SQUAD........................ 338 A. The Firing Squad from Wilderness to Statehood ................................................................. 339 B. From Statehood to Furman ......................................... 347 1. Gary Gilmore to the Present Death Row Crowd ................................................ 357 2. Modern Firing Squad Procedure .......................... 363 III. EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE ................................ 365 A. A History of Pain ......................................................... 366 B. Early Supreme Court Cases......................................... 368 C. Evolving Standards of Decency and the Dignity of Man...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Death Penalty Legal in Utah
    Is The Death Penalty Legal In Utah Attached and thermophile Witty strap cephalad and intermediate his salubrity dead and Hebraically. Herbie is barricaded: albumenizingshe widens skimpily and slabber and drives erenow, her bicentenarypoorhouse. andXenos single-hearted. edifying his ampoules enquire rustlingly or drizzly after Augustin Is The Firing Squad More Humane Than Lethal Injection. The penalty in all were also links to justify the. This topic many ways to your shirt off! Lethal injection is become primary newspaper of execution in states where recent's legal. A Conservative Argument Against the face Penalty in Utah. OGDEN Debate over Utah's death mode is intensifying in 2nd District much as attorneys prepare about the trial made an Ogden couple accused. Capital Punishment ACLU of Utah. When implement the last four penalty in Utah? 30-Year Prosecutor Shares Thoughts on the fair Penalty. Division pushes to the penalty in texas death penalty in the. Latter-day rain church denies interfering with source row. Utah and other states passed new modern death penalty laws said Cassell Gilmore was lost first case demand the modern death what was. Utah's decision to reintroduce the firing squad set an execution method. The Utah Supreme power has ruled that whole case of every inmate on consistent row will. Utah governor signs law allowing firing squads for death. Oklahoma allow the modern japan has more feasible than women of death penalty is the death in utah must also force in? The stroke can legally execute a row inmates by lethal injection or the firing squad In a move unless drew people in Utah and nationwide the.
    [Show full text]
  • April 6, 2017
    Celebrating 125 years as Davis County’s news source SheTech event prepares students The for the future Davis Clipper ON A4 VOL. 125 NO. 36 THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2017 THE BOUNTIFUL CITY COUNCIL recently approved a six-month moratorium on new development in the community’s historic district. The moratorium is in response to resident concerns that the historic character of the neighborhoods be preserved if new businesses or multi-family housing projects are proposed for Thrive the area. Photos by Tom Haraldsen | Davis Clipper Explore more about vision with the latest word on cataracts, Moratorium for Bountiful historic area stem therapy for eye disease, and more. By TOM HARALDSEN “It’s a three-prong approach,” height, setbacks, parking and [email protected] he said. “We’ll first talk to those in other standards. THRIVE, B1 the neighborhoods and find out There have also been calls for their concerns. Then we’ll take preserving existing homes and BOUNTIFUL—After hearing concerns voiced by that information to the planning possibly changing the zoning commission, who can make in the area from multi-family some residents and business owners in a section of recommendations. Once we have residential to single-family. the community near historic downtown, Bountiful’s something ready to present to Councilmember Kendalyn the council, we’ll bring a proposal Harris stated the six-month time City Council approved adoption of a six-month mora- back before you for adoption. The frame could be punitive for anyone torium on new development in that area. key thing is making sure that we hoping to start new developments can maintain the identity of this this year, as it would push the The section in question is between 400 North and area and that development going approval date of any proposed 500 South, from 400 East to 200 West.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 33 No. 6 Nov/Dec 2020 Partner up with POWER Is Your Firm Concerned About Expenses in This Current Economic Cycle?
    Utah Bar® JOURNAL Volume 33 No. 6 Nov/Dec 2020 Partner Up With POWER Is your firm concerned about expenses in this current economic cycle? Concerned insurance carriers or corporate defendants will try to “lowball” or stall your contingency cases? In need of an aggressive team to get top value for your clients and get it done without more delays? Eisenberg, Cutt, Kendell & Olson are here to help you. Our full-time business is working with lawyers and firms to co-counsel larger contingency fee injury, tort and insurance cases. We have the staff and financial resources to aggressively prosecute cases even in the hardest economic times. We can do it all or work side by side with you. If needed, we can also help with case expenses and costs. We’d like to talk to you about getting the most for your cases. 801.366.9100 | www.eckolaw.com The Utah Bar Journal Published by the Utah State Bar | 645 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 | 801-531-9077 | www.utahbar.org BAR JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-Chief Utah Law Developments Editor Editor at Large Alisha Giles LaShel Shaw Todd Zagorec Managing Editor Judicial Advisor Young Lawyer Representative Andrea Valenti Arthur Judge Gregory K. Orme Alex Sandvik Articles Editors Copy Editors Paralegal Representative LaShel Shaw Hal Armstrong Greg Wayment Victoria Luman Paul Justensen Jacqueline Carlton Bar Staff Liaison Editors Emeritus Christine Critchley Departments Editor William D. Holyoak Ryan Beckstrom Judge Catherine E. Roberts (Ret.) Advertising/Design Manager Laniece Roberts MISSION & VISION OF THE BAR: The lawyers of the Utah State Bar serve the public and legal profession with excellence, civility, and integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Utah Have a Death Penalty
    Does Utah Have A Death Penalty regencies!Septicemic Seligand calligraphicalis benedictional Purcell and mast:plenishes which tidily Arturo while is boskiestuntended Spencer enough? man Diplomatical and sprains. and Arkansan Esau never raced his Automation and services, he reasoned that utah have a death does not Hundreds of writing for money will not extending its firing squad? The penalty that utah have death does a penalty, or try again, virginia colony commonly granted a separate filing, assistant attorney stephen howard practices as a race. Stacey Plaskett reacts to Sen. The gust of death does it deter deer be murders. Interested in the firing squad, a life sentence must have rarely sought the death does a penalty? Please check back later. Wilkerson and iran engenders negative publicity stunt or that penalty does utah have a death penalty immoral for swearingen to human dignity of his mouth. Methods of execution by state Electric chair firing squad. United states in arizona have mercy and suffering from. Method of execution in three states Mississippi Oklahoma and Utah Source death Penalty Information Center deathpenaltyinfoorg. Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina and Washington to build bipartisan support in legislatures where rancor between parties has stymied scores of other bills. Many opponents of capital punishment feel whether it is morally wrong. Utah death-row inmate featured in health-selling book dies. This content represents the views and opinions of the advertiser, who is responsible or all ridicule the material contained therein. Many benefit that wield death penalty is yellow and unusual punishment and therefore unconstitutional. Execution any historical memory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eighth Amendment and State Efforts to Reinstitute Traditional Methods of Execution
    Washington Law Review Volume 90 Number 3 10-1-2015 Nothing Less Than the Dignity of Man: The Eighth Amendment and State Efforts to Reinstitute Traditional Methods of Execution James C. Feldman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation James C. Feldman, Notes and Comments, Nothing Less Than the Dignity of Man: The Eighth Amendment and State Efforts to Reinstitute Traditional Methods of Execution, 90 Wash. L. Rev. 1313 (2015). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol90/iss3/6 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 09 - Feldman.docx (Do Not Delete) 10/23/2015 12:49 PM NOTHING LESS THAN THE DIGNITY OF MAN: THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND STATE EFFORTS TO REINSTITUTE TRADITIONAL METHODS OF EXECUTION James C. Feldman Abstract: While lethal injection is the predominant method of executing death row inmates in America, European export bans and pharmaceutical manufacturers’ refusal to supply execution drugs has impeded the ability of states’ departments of corrections to obtain the drugs used for lethal injections. Facing a drug shortage, several death penalty states have considered legislation to reinstate the use of electric chairs, firing squads, and gas chambers. Efforts to restore traditional methods of capital punishment raise questions about whether such methods still comply with the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments.
    [Show full text]
  • When Prison Gets Old: Examining New Challenges Facing Elderly Prisoners in America
    When Prison Gets Old: Examining New Challenges Facing Elderly Prisoners In America by Benjamin Pomerance ―The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” -- Russian author Fyodor Dostoyevsky John H. Bunz will celebrate his ninety-second birthday in November.1 Described by observers as ―feeble-looking‖ after the death of his wife in 2010, he requires a walker to take even a couple of steps, and needs a wheelchair to travel any distance of significant length.2 Yet he still is in better health than George Sanges, age 73, who suffers from cerebral palsy, has sagging skin that is listed as ―sallow,‖ takes multiple medications twice a day, and has recently been rushed to the emergency room for heart problems.3 And both of them are far more alert than Leon Baham, a 71-year-old man who has dementia and goes into delusional bouts of yearning for the company of his now-dead wife.4 On the surface, all of these elderly, ailing men have extremely sympathetic profiles. All three need intensive medical care.5 All three have unique physical and emotional needs that are inherent to growing older.6 All three appear to be the type of ―grandfatherly‖ figures to whom our society is historically taught to show the utmost compassion and concern. Yet all three of these individuals also have a huge component of their lives which would naturally tend to turn all thoughts of sympathy and care upside-down. They are all prisoners.7 Not low-level criminals, either, but violent felony offenders with significant sentences.
    [Show full text]
  • Firing Squads and the Euphemism of "Evolving Standards of Decency" Alexander Vey
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 69 | Issue 2 Article 6 3-2016 No Clean Hands in a Dirty Business: Firing Squads and the Euphemism of "Evolving Standards of Decency" Alexander Vey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Alexander Vey, No Clean Hands in a Dirty Business: Firing Squads and the Euphemism of "Evolving Standards of Decency", 69 Vanderbilt Law Review 545 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol69/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. No Clean Hands in a Dirty Business: Firing Squads and the Euphemism of "Evolving Standards of Decency" IN TRODU CTION ............................................................................... 54 5 1. THE RIGHT AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT ....................................................... 551 A. The Evolution of "Evolving Standards of Decency" ........................... 551 B. "The Mere Extinguishment of Life" ........................ 558 II. THE REALITY OF AMERICAN EXECUTION METHODS ............ 562 A. The Long Drop: Hanging......................................... 563 B. Shocking Developments: Electrocution.................... 565 C. Better Killing Through Chemistry: Lethal Gas .......567 D. "How Enviable a Quiet Death"- Lethal Injection .....568 III. GOING BACK TO Go FORWARD: AN ARGUMENT FOR THE FIRING SQUAD ....................................................... 573 A. History and Method of the FiringSquad ................ 574 B. The Firing Squad Better Adheres to the Eighth Am endment ............................................ 575 C. The FiringSquad Is Easier to Implement and M akes Litigation Simpler ........................................ 578 D.
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH BOARD of PARDONS and PAROLE DECISIONS REPORT from Wednesday, August 21, 2019 to Monday, September 30, 2019 Hearing Date: 2019-08-21
    Run Date/Time: 10/01/2019 / 11:23 Page 1 of 391 UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE DECISIONS REPORT from Wednesday, August 21, 2019 to Monday, September 30, 2019 Hearing Date: 2019-08-21 Offender # Offender Name Offender Hearing Type 189795 Tracy Lynn Winn SPECIAL ATTENTION REVIEW RESULTS Effective Date 1. CONTINUE ON PAROLE/ALTERNATIVE EVENT 08/21/2019 2. RIM: 3 DAY JAIL SANCTION APPROVED 08/21/2019 HEARING NOTES 1. RIM 3 DAY JAIL SANCTION APPROVED. AP&P to consider screening for Parole Violator Program on next violation. Offender # Offender Name Offender Hearing Type 140316 James Steven Sargetis REHEARING RESULTS Effective Date 1. REHEARING 11/01/2019 HEARING NOTES 1. Schedule Rehearing 11/2019 with updated medical report due to the Board of Pardons by 10/01/2019.*** Mr. Sargetis is expected to fully and completely participate in medical evaluation prior to Rehearing, failure to participate will result in further rehe Offender # Offender Name Offender Hearing Type 160441 Jesse Butcher ORIGINAL HEARING RESULTS Effective Date 1. PAROLE GRANTED 10/15/2019 AGREEMENT CONDITIONS 1. STANDARD PAROLE 2. BOPP MNTL HLTH/SUB ABUSE 3. GANG 4. Enter CCC until stabilized, which may include GPS monitoring. 5. Successfully complete educational and/or vocational training or other training as directed. 6. Complete Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to address criminogenic needs as identified in the risk and needs assessment. HEARING NOTES 1. Restitution in Case #151701940 to be returned to the sentencing court for verification, Judgment and Commitment notes that remaining financials have been sent to the Office of State Debt Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy Services for Prisoners
    Copy Services for Prisoners The Utah State Law Library provides copy services for prisoners in Utah. Limited service is provided to prisoners outside of Utah. Services Provided for Prisoners in Utah We will copy cases, statutes, treatises, journal articles, Utah appellate briefs, and other legal materials from our library's print or electronic collection and will KeyCite (Shepardize) citations for prisoners in Utah. Services Provided for Prisoners Outside of Utah We will only copy superseded Utah code sections or Utah appellate briefs for prisoners outside of Utah. We do not provide any other resources to prisoners outside of Utah. We cannot do legal research or provide legal advice. We will send – at no charge – copies of sections from an index or a table of contents when possible to help you narrow your request. Charges Copies 25¢ each We will copy two book pages on one side of paper, and copy on both sides of a page to save paper. You are charged for each side. Postage $3.00 If you are incarcerated at Salt Lake County Jail, Utah State Prison, or Central Utah Correctional Facility, we will send your request by interoffice mail so there is no postage charge. Paying for Copies • Advance payment is required. We will not process your request until we have received payment. • There is no minimum deposit. The maximum balance is $100. • We can provide an estimate of how much your request will cost. • Make checks or money orders payable to Utah State Law Library. • Friends or family may deposit money into your account using a credit card (Visa or MasterCard).
    [Show full text]
  • State Court Organization, 1998 Conference of State Court Administrators, Court Statistics Committee
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics State Court Organization 1998 Victim-offender relationship in violent crimes (rape/sexual assault, robbery, and assault) by sex of victim Courts and judges Judicial selection and service Judicial branch Appellate courts Trial courts The jury The sentencing context Court structure U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics State Court Organization 1998 By David B. Rottman Carol R. Flango Melissa T. Cantrell Randall Hansen Neil LaFountain A joint effort of Conference of State Court Administrators and National Center for State Courts June 2000, NCJ 178932 U.S Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Jan M. Chaiken, Ph.D. Director, BJS This Bureau of Justice Statistics report was prepared by the National Center for State Courts under the Supervision of Steven K. Smith and Marika F.X. Litras of the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The project was supported by BJS grant number 98-BJ-CX-K002. Principle staff for the project at the National Center for State Courts were David B. Rottman, Ph.D., Carol R. Flango, Melissa T. Cantrell, Randall Hansen, and Neil LaFountain. Tom Hester and Carol DeFrances of BJS provided editorial review. Jayne Robinson administered final production. This report was made possible by the support and guidance of the Court Statistics Committee of the Conference of State Court Administrators. Please bring suggestions for information that should be included in future editions to the attention of the Director of the Court Statistics Project, National Center for State Courts, 300 Newport Avenue, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8798.
    [Show full text]
  • Colby Alumnus Vol. 51, No. 1: Fall 1961
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Colby Alumnus Colby College Archives 1962 Colby Alumnus Vol. 51, No. 1: Fall 1961 Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/alumnus Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Colby College, "Colby Alumnus Vol. 51, No. 1: Fall 1961" (1962). Colby Alumnus. 375. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/alumnus/375 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the Colby College Archives at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Colby Alumnus by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. THE OLBY C 0o,s 9- \f[t' ALUMNUS FALL 1961 Colby Clubs MAIN E WATERVILLE AREA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION MERRIMACK VALLEY ALUMNAE CLUB President - George L. Beach, Jr., '41 President - Hilda Niehoff True, '43 COLBY TEACHERS CLUB 32 Morrill Avenue, Waterville 81 Elm Street, Georgetown President - Richard C. Michelsen, '49 Vice-President - Norman W. Beals, '37 Vice-President - Myra Stone Pruitt, '28 77 Gill Street, Auburn Sec.-Treas. - Ruth Moore Brown, '40 Sec.-Treas. - Vivian Maxwell Brown, '44 Rep. to A. C. - Albert L. Skidds, '33 Rep. to A. C. - Robert M. Tonge, '49 Rep. to A. C. - Lois B. Crowell, '34 BATH-BRUNSWICK ALUMNI ASSOCIATION SPRINGFIELD COLBY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION President - Virginia Kingsley Jones, '39 CONNECTICUT President - J. Joseph Freme, '41 East Boothbay FAIRFIELD COUNTY COLBY ALUMNI AS­ 25 Madison Avenue, Springfield 5 Vice-President - Earl L. Wade, '39 SOCIATION Vice-President - Wayne B. Sanders, '37 Sec.-Treas. - Ava Dodge Barton, '28 '52 Sec.-Treas. - Shirley Carrier Brown, '48 Rep. to A. C.
    [Show full text]