Pethia Nigrofasciata) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
News 111-E.Pdf
2 NEWS 111 Inhalt Impressum Rosy barbs 3 Preview: Herausgeber: Wolfgang Glaser New tetras from Peru 6 News No 112 Chefredakteur: Dipl. -Biol. Frank Schäfer Current importations 11 will appear on KW 17/18 2014 Redaktionsbeirat: Thorsten Holtmann Volker Ennenbach Baldellia ranunculoides 19 Don’t miss it! Dr. med. vet. Markus Biffar Thorsten Reuter The ideal dwarf turtle 22 Levin Locke Do you know Procatopus? 26 Manuela Sauer Dipl.- Biol. Klaus Diehl Giant plated Lizard 31 AqualogKids Layout: Bärbel Waldeyer Black spectacled toad 36 Goldfishes 44 Übersetzungen: Mary Bailey Gestaltung: Aqualog animalbook GmbH Tilefishes 38 TerralogKids Frederik Templin The Axolotl - extinct? 42 Curlytail lizards 46 Titelgestaltung: Petra Appel, Steffen Kabisch Druck: Westdeutsche Verlags- und Druckerei GmbH, Mörfelden- Walldorf Wollen Sie keine Ausgabe der News versäumen ? Gedruckt am: 9.4.2014 Anzeigendisposition: Aqualog animalbook GmbH Werden Sie Abonnent(in) und füllen Sie einfach den Abonnenten-Abschnitt aus und Verlag Liebigstraße 1, D-63110 Rodgau und schicken ihn an: Aqualog animalbook GmbH, Liebigstr.1, D- 63110 Rodgau Tel: 49 (0) 61 06 - 697977 Fax: 49 (0) 61 06 - 697983 Hiermit abonniere ich die Ausgaben 110-113 (2014) zum Preis von €12 ,- für 4 Ausgaben, e-mail: [email protected] (außerhalb Deutschlands € 19,90) inkl. Porto und Verpackung. http://www.aqualog.de All rights reserved. The publishers do not accept liability for unsolicited manuscripts or photographs. Articles written Name by named authors do not necessarily represent the editors’ opinion. Anschrift ISSN 1430-9610 Land I PLZ I Wohnort Ich möchte folgendermaßen bezahlen: auf Rechnung Visa I Mastercard Prüf.- Nr.: Kartennummer: gültig bis: Name des Karteninhabers (falls nicht identisch mit dem Namen des Abonnenten) Wie und wo erhalten Sie die News ? Jeder Zoofachhändler, jede Tierarztpraxis und jeder Zoologische Garten kann beim Aqualog-Verlag ein Kontingent der NEWS anfordern und als Kundenzeitschrift auslegen. -
Freshwater Fish Survey of Homadola-Nakiyadeniya Estates, Sri Lanka
FRESHWATER FISH SURVEY OF HOMADOLA-NAKIYADENIYA ESTATES, SRI LANKA. Prepared by Hiranya Sudasinghe BSc. (Hons) Zoology, M.Phil. reading (University of Peradeniya) INTRODUCTION The diversity of freshwater fishes in Sri Lanka is remarkably high, with a total of 93 indigenous fishes being recorded from inland waters, out of which 53 are considered to be endemic (MOE, 2012; Batuwita et al., 2013). Out of these, 21 are listed as Critically Endangered, 19 as Endangered and five as Vulnerable in the National Red List (MOE, 2012). In addition, several new species of freshwater fishes have been discovered in the recent past which have not yet been evaluated for Red Listing (Batuwita et al., 2017; Sudasinghe 2017; Sudasinghe & Meegaskumbura, 2016; Sudasinghe et al., 2016). Out of the 22 families that represent the Sri Lankan freshwater ichthyofauna, the family Cyprinidae dominates, representing about 50% of the species, followed by the families Gobiidae, Channidae and Bagridae, which represent seven, five and four species, respectively. The remainder of the other families are each represented in Sri Lanka by three species or less. Four major ichthyological zones, viz. Southwestern zone, Mahaweli zone, Dry zone and the Transition zone were identified by Senanayake and Moyle (1982) based on the distribution and the endemism of the fish. The Southwestern zone shows the greatest diversity, followed by the Mahaweli zone, with the least diversity observed in the Dry zone. About 60% of the freshwater fishes occur both in the dry and the wet zones of the island while the rest are more or less restricted to the wet zone. Of the endemic fishes, more than 60% are restricted to the wet zone of the island while about 30% occur in both the dry and the wet zones. -
Aliens; a Catastrophe for Native Fresh Water Fish Diversity in Pakistan
The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(2 Suppl.): 2011, Page: 435-440 ISSN: 1018-7081 ALIENS; A CATASTROPHE FOR NATIVE FRESH WATER FISH DIVERSITY IN PAKISTAN A. M. Khan, Z. Ali, S. Y. Shelly* Z. Ahmad** and M. R. Mirza** Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore *Department of Fisheries, Government of Punjab, Munawan, Lahore. Department of Zoology, Government College University, Lahore Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Pakistan has introduced several alien exotic fish species e.g. grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), bighead carp, (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), silver carp, (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), gold fish (Carassius auratus), and three species of tilapia (Oreochromis aureus, Oreochromis mossambicus, Oreochromis niloticus) in warm waters along with two trout species: the rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) and the brown trout (Salmo trutta fario) in colder regions for specific purposes like sport fishing, yield enhancement and biological control of aquatic weeds and mosquitoes. The exotic species are becoming invasive in the freshwater biomes of the Punjab and other provinces of Pakistan by reason of their potent reproductive potential and feeding competitions with the native freshwater fish fauna. Resultantly the native fish species viz; Channa marulius, Wallago attu, Rita rita, Sperata sarwari, Gibelion catla, Cirrhinus mrigala and Labeo rohita, which are of economic value are under threat. Key words: Exotic, invasions, freshwater, fish fauna, Pakistan. wild, 421 (35 %) are reported as not established and 177 INTRODUCTION (15 %) with unknown establishment (Fish base, 2003). In Asia, there have been 406 introduction There are more than 186 freshwater fish species records, 176 (43.3 %) are reported as having been described from freshwater bodies of Pakistan. -
Fish, Various Invertebrates
Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations ................................................. -
Pethia Meingangbii ERSS
Pethia meingangbii (a fish, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, August 2013 Revised, February 2019 Web Version, 6/30/2020 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: Uncertain 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Asia: Yu River drainage in Manipur, India.” From Singh (2015): “This species is known from Manipur (Chindwin-Irrawaddy drainage), in northeastern India and Myanmar.” Status in the United States No records of Pethia meingangbii in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. 1 Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Pethia meingangbii in the United States were found. Remarks Both the current valid name of this species, Pethia meingangbii, and the original name, Puntius meingangbii, were used to search for information. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Fricke et al. (2019), Pethia meingangbii (Arunkumar and Tombi Singh 2003) is the current and valid name of this species. This species was originally referred to as Puntius meingangbii Arunkumar and Tombi Singh 2003. From Froese and Pauly (2019b): “Animalia (Kingdom) > Chordata (Phylum) > Vertebrata (Subphylum) > Gnathostomata (Superclass) > […] Actinopterygii (Class) > Cypriniformes (Order) > Cyprinidae (Family) > Barbinae (Subfamily) > Pethia (Genus) > Pethia meingangbii (Species)” Size, Weight, and Age Range No information on size, weight or age range was found for Pethia meingangbii. Environment From -
Pethia Guganio (Glass Barb) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
Glass Barb (Pethia guganio) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, August 2013 Revised, July 2018 Web Version, 8/7/2019 Photo: A. Bentley, University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Available: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/656971757. (July 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Dahanukar (2015): “Pethia guganio is widely distributed in India (Ganga, Brahmaputra, Yamuna river systems in the Gangetic Provinces, Assam, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bangal), Bangladesh. Jayaram (1991).” From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Ganga-Brahmaputra basin, Nepal, India and Bangladesh.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. There is no indication that this species is in trade in the United States. 1 Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. Remarks Both the accepted name Pethia guganio and the synonym Puntius guganio were used when researching in preparation of this assessment. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Puntius Species Puntius guganio (Hamilton, 1822) – glass-barb” From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): -
A Manual for Commercial Production of the Tiger Barb, ~C~T Etnlnmmi
saeAU-8-97-002 C3 A Manual for Commercial Production of the Tiger Barb, ~c~t etnlnmmI. A T p y P i d T k Sp By: Clyde S. Tamaru, Ph.D. Brian Cole, M.S. Richard Bailey, B.A. Christopher Brown, Ph.o. Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture Publication Number 129 Commercial Production of Tiger 8arbs ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This manual is a combined effort of three institutions, United States Department of Agriculture Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture CTSA!, and University of Hawaii Sea Grant Extension Service SGES! and Aquaculture Development Program ADP!, Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii. Financial support for this project was provided by the Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture through grants from the US Department of Agriculture USDA grant numbers 93-38500-8583 and 94-38500-0065!. Production of the manual is also funded in part by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, project kA/AS-1 which is sponsored by the University of Hawaii Sea Grant College Program, School of Ocean Earth Science and Technology SOEST!, under institutional Grant No. NA36RG0507 from NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce, UNIHI-SEAGRANT-TR-96-01. Support for the production of the manual was also provided by the Aquaculture Development Program, Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii, as part of their Aquaculture Extension Project with University of Hawaii Sea Grant Extension, Service Contract Nos. 9325 and 9638. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USDA or any of its sub-agencies. -
Pethia Setnai ERSS
Pethia setnai (a fish, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2013 Revised, February 2019 Web Version, 6/30/2020 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: Uncertain 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Goa, India.” From Katwate et al. (2013): “Pethia setnai is an endemic and threatened freshwater fish of the Western Ghats of India. It has a restricted distribution in the west flowing rivers in the states of Maharashtra, Goa and Karnataka.” Status in the United States No records of Pethia setnai in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. 1 Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Pethia setnai in the wild in the United States were found. Remarks Literature searches were conducted under Pethia setnai and the synonym Puntius setnai. From Katwate et al. (2013): “Further, the species is also known to occur in aquarium trade under the common name Indigo Barb [Chhapgar and Sane 1992].” 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Fricke et al. (2019), Pethia setnai (Chhapgar and Sane 1992) is the current valid name of this species. Pethia setnai was originally described as Puntius setnai Chhapgar and Sane, 1992. From GBIF Secretariat (2019): Kingdom Animalia Phylum Chordata Class Teleostei Order Cypriniformes Family Cyprinidae Genus Pethia Species Pethia setnai Chhapgar and Sane, 1992 Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Max length : 5.7 cm TL male/unsexed; [Menon 1999]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Freshwater; benthopelagic.” “Found in clear streams [Menon 1999].” Climate From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Tropical” 2 Distribution Outside the United States Native From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Goa, India.” From Katwate et al. -
Evaluation of Biological Aspects of Baringo Barb I (Ruppell 1835) in Lake Baringo Geoffrey Odhiambo1* and George Osure2
15(S2): 031-038 (2021) Journal of FisheriesSciences.com E-ISSN 1307-234X © 2021 www.fisheriessciences.com Research Article Evaluation of Biological Aspects of Baringo Barb i (Ruppell 1835) in Lake Baringo Geoffrey Odhiambo1* and George Osure2 1Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, P.O. Box 81651-80100, Mombasa, Kenya 2Pwani University, P.O Box 195-80108, Kilifi County, Kenya Received: 09.03.2021 / Accepted: 23.03.2021 / Published online: 31.03.2021 Abstract: The Baringo barb Labeobarbus intermsdius is one of the least studied native fish species in Lake Baringo, a shallow freshwater lake located in the eastern arm of the Rift Valley, Kenya. This study evaluated aspects of its biology to provide baseline scientific information on the species. Fish were sampled using gillnets and their lengths (to the nearest 0.1 cm) and weight (to the nearest 0.1 g) measured on a meter board and electronic balance respectively. Parameters of the length-weight relationship were obtained by fitting the power equation; W=a × Lb to length and weight data. Each fish was dissected to remove the stomach for stomach content analysis. Gonads examined gonads for sexing and determination of maturity stage. Fish size in a total of 280 individual sampled during the study ranged from 6.0 to 36.0 cm total length and 4.3 to 1314 g total weight. The b value of the length-weight relationship was 3.1177 indicate positive allometric growth. Of 254 sexed individuals 107 were males and 147 were female giving a ratio of male to female to be 1:1.38 which was significantly different from the expected 1:1 sex ratio (chi-square test, p<0.05). -
Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................ -
Parasites of Barbus Species (Cyprinidae) of Southern Africa
Parasites of Barbus species (Cyprinidae) of southern Africa By Pieter Johannes Swanepoel Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State. Supervisor: Prof J.G. van As Co-supervisor: Prof L.L. van As Co-supervisor: Dr K.W. Christison July 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 CYPRINIDAE .......................................................................................................... 6 BARBUS ............................................................................................................... 10 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 12 2. Study Sites ................................................................................................ 16 OKAVANGO RIVER SYSTEM .............................................................................. 17 Importance ................................................................................................................... 17 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 17 Habitat and Vegetation ................................................................................................ 19 Leseding Research Camp........................................................................................... -
Impact of Fishing with Tephrosia Candida (Fabaceae) on Diversity
Impact of fishing with Tephrosia candida (Fabaceae) on diversity and abundance of fish in the streams at the boundary of Sinharaja Man and Biosphere Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka Udaya Priyantha Kankanamge Epa & Chamari Ruvandika Waniga Chinthamanie Mohotti Department of Zoology & Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya 11600, Sri Lanka; [email protected], [email protected] Received 07-V-2015. Corrected 04-III-2016. Accepted 31-III-2016. Abstract: Local communities in some Asian, African and American countries, use plant toxins in fish poisoning for fishing activities; however, the effects of this practice on the particular wild fish assemblages is unknown. This study was conducted with the aim to investigate the effects of fish poisoning using Tephrosia candida, on freshwater fish diversity and abundance in streams at the boundary of the World Natural Heritage site, Sinharaja Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. A total of seven field trips were undertaken on a bimonthly basis, from May 2013 to June 2014. We surveyed five streams with similar environmental and climatological conditions at the boundary of Sinharaja forest. We selected three streams with active fish poisoning practices as treatments, and two streams with no fish poisoning as controls. Physico-chemical parameters and flow rate of water in selected streams were also measured at bimonthly intervals. Fish were sampled by electrofishing and nets in three randomly selected confined locations (6 x 2 m stretch) along every stream. Fish species were identified, their abundances were recorded, and Shannon-Weiner diversity index was calculated for each stream. Streams were clustered based on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix for fish composition and abundance.