DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2104.08786V1 [Cs.CL] 18 Apr 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2104.08786V1 [Cs.CL] 18 Apr 2021 Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity Yao Luy Max Bartoloy Alastair Moorez Sebastian Riedely Pontus Stenetorpy yDepartment of Computer Science, University College London zMishcon de Reya LLP {yao.lu,m.bartolo,s.riedel,p.stenetorp}@cs.ucl.ac.uk [email protected] Abstract 100 When primed with only a handful of training 90 samples, very large pretrained language models such as GPT-3, have shown competitive results 80 when compared to fully-supervised fine-tuned large pretrained language models. We demon- 70 strate that the order in which the samples are provided can be the difference between near SST-2 Accuracy (%) 60 state-of-the-art and random guess performance: Essentially some permutations are “fantastic” and some not. We analyse this phenomenon 50 in detail, establishing that: it is present across 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.5 2.7 6.7 13 175 model sizes (even for the largest current mod- Model Parameters (Billion) els), it is not related to a specific subset of sam- Figure 1: Two-shot, full permutation performance and ples, and that a given good permutation for one standard deviation between sample orders for different model is not transferable to another. While one sizes of GPT-family models (GPT-2 and GPT-3). could use a development set to determine which permutations are performant, this would devi- ate from the few-shot setting as it requires addi- as sentiment analysis, they produce text classifica- tional annotated data. Instead, we use the gener- ative nature of the language models to construct tion results that can match those of fully supervised an artificial development set and based on en- models. This type of few shot "In Context Learn- tropy statistics of the candidate permutations ing" (Brown et al., 2020) enables practitioners to from this set we identify performant prompts. address challenging tasks with minimal annotation Our method improves upon GPT-family mod- overhead and without the need to instantiate a new els by on average 13% relative across eleven large language model for each new task. different established text classification tasks. A core component of in-context learning is the 1 Introduction text-based prompt that serves as the context. Com- posing a prompt requires: (i) text linearisation us- Big pretrained language models (PLMs) (Devlin ing a template; and (ii) training sample concatena- tion (See Table1 for a concrete example). Finding arXiv:2104.08786v1 [cs.CL] 18 Apr 2021 et al., 2019; Peters et al., 2018; Raffel et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019; Rad- a template that optimises the performance of in- ford et al., 2019) have shown remarkable behaviour context learning has attracted a lot of attention in when conditioned with an appropriate textual con- the field (Shin et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2020; Schick text (Petroni et al., 2019, 2020; Jiang et al., 2020; and Schütze, 2020; Jiang et al., 2020). However, to Shin et al., 2020; Davison et al., 2019). For ex- the best of our knowledge, no existing work studies ample, when conditioned with a long document the effect of the sample order on in-context learning and a “TL;DR:” token, they generate a summary of performance. said document, and when design cloze-task such Perhaps counter-intuitively, we find that the right as “The theory of relativity was developed by __”, sample order can make as much of a difference as they generate the answer for this question. the right template. As can be seen in Figure1, Perhaps most strikingly, when primed with a con- some permutations have comparable performance text consisting of very few training examples, such (over 85% accuracy) to supervised training for sen- Example (the greatest musicians, 1) training set (redundant concept, 0) Review: the greatest musicians. Sentiment: positive linearization Review: redundant concept. Sentiment: negative Review: the greatest musicians. Sentiment: positive. Review: redundant concept. Sentiment: negative concatenation OR Review: redundant concept. Sentiment: negative. Review: the greatest musicians. Sentiment: positive Figure 2: Training sample permutations for the in- context learning setting. The concatenation of training Table 1: Procedures for prompt construction. samples as well as test data converts the classification task into a sequence generation task. timent classifications, while others perform close to random (around 50%). This order sensitivity is 2 Order Sensitivity and Prompt Design universal across models, and although increasing the model size somewhat addresses it, the prob- In this section, we study the relationship between lem is still present for some text classification tasks permutation performance and various factors. Un- (Subj, TREC, and CB) for models with billions of less otherwise specified, we use a fixed random parameters. subset of four samples with a balanced label distri- In our analysis, we find no common denomina- bution from the SST-2 dataset and consider all 24 tors between performant sample orders and they possible sample order permutations. This setup is are not transferable across different model sizes illustrated in Figure2. and tasks. In a fully-supervised setting, we could rely on a development set to select among sample Size (almost) does not matter We evaluate the orders. However, this is not desirable in a few-shot order permutations for four different sizes of GPT- setting where the size of the development set is 2 (0.1B–1.5B)1 and four different sizes of GPT-3 very limited. Instead, we use the generative nature (2.7B–175B). As we can observe in Figure1, mod- of language models to construct an unlabelled artifi- els can obtain remarkable few-shot performance. cial development set and refer to it as a probing set. We see that the GPT2-XL (1.5B) model can even Since there are no reliable labels available for the surpass 90% accuracy given just four samples. This probing set, we instead use predicted label distribu- result is comparable to those of supervised models tion statistics and propose an entropy-based metrics trained on more than 60,000 samples. However, to measure the quality of candidate prompts over the performance variation of different permutations the probing set. Experimental results show that remain a big issue, especially for “smaller” mod- we can achieve on average 13% relative improve- els.2 The same model can exhibit nearly perfect ment across eleven different established text classi- behaviour given one sample order, but then fall fication tasks on all different sizes (four orders of back to be on par with a random baseline for an- magnitude) of pretrained language models. other. While increasing the model size (by a few To summarise, our contributions are as follows: order of magnitudes) can sometimes alleviate the issue, it still cannot resolve it entirely (especially 1. We study the order sensitivity of in-context if we consider tasks other than SST-2). In contrast, learning, which we show is crucial for the different initialisations of supervised fine-tuning success of pretrained language models for few- approaches typically result in less than 1% stan- shot learning. dard deviation for their test set performance (Gao 2. We propose a simple, straightforward, et al., 2020). generation-based probing method to identify performant prompts without requiring addi- Adding training samples does not significantly tional data. reduce variance To further explore the sensitiv- ity of few-shot prompts, we increase the number 3. Our probing method is universally applica- of training samples, and then sample a subset of at ble and effective across different sizes of pre- 1 trained language models over different types We can also refer these models as GPT2-base, GPT2- medium, GPT2-Large, and GPT2-XL. of datasets. We achieve on average a 13% rel- 2The smallest model in our experiment is the same size as ative improvement over a wide range of tasks. BERT-base. 100 1 GPT2-Large (0.8B) 175B -0.17 -0.23 -0.35 -0.14 0.05 0.27 -0.22 1.00 GPT2-XL (1.5B) 90 13B -0.24 0.01 -0.12 0.01 0.12 0.04 1.00 -0.22 Spearman Correlation 6.7B -0.10 -0.26 0.19 -0.03 0.13 1.00 0.04 0.27 80 2.7B 0.07 -0.11 0.10 -0.27 1.00 0.13 0.12 0.05 70 1.5B -0.24 0.20 -0.04 1.00 -0.27 -0.03 0.01 -0.14 SST-2 Accuracy(%) 60 Model Parameters 0.8B 0.23 0.08 1.00 -0.04 0.10 0.19 -0.12 -0.35 0.3B 0.09 1.00 0.08 0.20 -0.11 -0.26 0.01 -0.23 50 0.1B 1.00 0.09 0.23 -0.24 0.07 -0.10 -0.24 -0.17 1 2 4 8 16 32 N-shot Training Examples 0 0.1B 0.3B 0.8B 1.5B 2.7B 6.7B 13B 175B Figure 3: Order sensitivity using different numbers of training samples. Figure 4: Permutation performance correlation between different models. 3 250 positive 85 most 24 different orderings. We use the GPT2-XL negative 80 (1.5B) and GPT2-Large (0.8B) models for this ex- 200 75 150 periment. In the results shown in Figure3, we can 70 100 65 observe that increasing the number of training sam- Number of Examples SST-2 Accuracy (%) 60 ples leads to increases in performance. However, 50 55 0 a high level of variance remains even with a large 51.6 85.2 SST-2 Accuracy(%) orginal calibrated number of samples and can even increase. Based on this, we draw the conclusion that order sensitiv- Figure 5: Left: Predicted SST-2 label distribution under ity is likely to be a fundamental issue of in-context different prompts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generative Adversarial Networks (Gans)
    Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) The coolest idea in Machine Learning in the last twenty years - Yann Lecun Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 1 / 39 Overview Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 3D GANs Domain Adaptation Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 2 / 39 Introduction Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 3 / 39 Supervised Learning Find deterministic function f: y = f(x), x:data, y:label Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 4 / 39 Unsupervised Learning "Most of human and animal learning is unsupervised learning. If intelligence was a cake, unsupervised learning would be the cake, supervised learning would be the icing on the cake, and reinforcement learning would be the cherry on the cake. We know how to make the icing and the cherry, but we do not know how to make the cake. We need to solve the unsupervised learning problem before we can even think of getting to true AI." - Yann Lecun "You cannot predict what you cannot understand" - Anonymous Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 5 / 39 Unsupervised Learning More challenging than supervised learning. No label or curriculum. Some NN solutions: Boltzmann machine AutoEncoder Generative Adversarial Networks Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 6 / 39 Unsupervised Learning vs Generative Model z = f(x) vs. x = g(z) P(z|x) vs P(x|z) Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 7 / 39 Autoencoders Stacked Autoencoders Use data itself as label Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 8 / 39 Autoencoders Denosing Autoencoders Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 9 / 39 Variational Autoencoder Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 10 / 39 Variational Autoencoder Results Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 11 / 39 Generative Adversarial Networks Ian Goodfellow et al, "Generative Adversarial Networks", 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Factor Graphs for Time Series Modeling
    Dynamic Factor Graphs for Time Series Modeling Piotr Mirowski and Yann LeCun Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 719 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 USA {mirowski,yann}@cs.nyu.edu http://cs.nyu.edu/∼mirowski/ Abstract. This article presents a method for training Dynamic Fac- tor Graphs (DFG) with continuous latent state variables. A DFG in- cludes factors modeling joint probabilities between hidden and observed variables, and factors modeling dynamical constraints on hidden vari- ables. The DFG assigns a scalar energy to each configuration of hidden and observed variables. A gradient-based inference procedure finds the minimum-energy state sequence for a given observation sequence. Be- cause the factors are designed to ensure a constant partition function, they can be trained by minimizing the expected energy over training sequences with respect to the factors’ parameters. These alternated in- ference and parameter updates can be seen as a deterministic EM-like procedure. Using smoothing regularizers, DFGs are shown to reconstruct chaotic attractors and to separate a mixture of independent oscillatory sources perfectly. DFGs outperform the best known algorithm on the CATS competition benchmark for time series prediction. DFGs also suc- cessfully reconstruct missing motion capture data. Key words: factor graphs, time series, dynamic Bayesian networks, re- current networks, expectation-maximization 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Time series collected from real-world phenomena are often an incomplete picture of a complex underlying dynamical process with a high-dimensional state that cannot be directly observed. For example, human motion capture data gives the positions of a few markers that are the reflection of a large number of joint angles with complex kinematic and dynamical constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy-Based Generative Adversarial Network
    Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2017 ENERGY-BASED GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NET- WORKS Junbo Zhao, Michael Mathieu and Yann LeCun Department of Computer Science, New York University Facebook Artificial Intelligence Research fjakezhao, mathieu, [email protected] ABSTRACT We introduce the “Energy-based Generative Adversarial Network” model (EBGAN) which views the discriminator as an energy function that attributes low energies to the regions near the data manifold and higher energies to other regions. Similar to the probabilistic GANs, a generator is seen as being trained to produce contrastive samples with minimal energies, while the discriminator is trained to assign high energies to these generated samples. Viewing the discrimi- nator as an energy function allows to use a wide variety of architectures and loss functionals in addition to the usual binary classifier with logistic output. Among them, we show one instantiation of EBGAN framework as using an auto-encoder architecture, with the energy being the reconstruction error, in place of the dis- criminator. We show that this form of EBGAN exhibits more stable behavior than regular GANs during training. We also show that a single-scale architecture can be trained to generate high-resolution images. 1I NTRODUCTION 1.1E NERGY-BASED MODEL The essence of the energy-based model (LeCun et al., 2006) is to build a function that maps each point of an input space to a single scalar, which is called “energy”. The learning phase is a data- driven process that shapes the energy surface in such a way that the desired configurations get as- signed low energies, while the incorrect ones are given high energies.
    [Show full text]
  • Discriminative Recurrent Sparse Auto-Encoders
    Discriminative Recurrent Sparse Auto-Encoders Jason Tyler Rolfe & Yann LeCun Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University 719 Broadway, 12th Floor New York, NY 10003 frolfe, [email protected] Abstract We present the discriminative recurrent sparse auto-encoder model, comprising a recurrent encoder of rectified linear units, unrolled for a fixed number of itera- tions, and connected to two linear decoders that reconstruct the input and predict its supervised classification. Training via backpropagation-through-time initially minimizes an unsupervised sparse reconstruction error; the loss function is then augmented with a discriminative term on the supervised classification. The depth implicit in the temporally-unrolled form allows the system to exhibit far more representational power, while keeping the number of trainable parameters fixed. From an initially unstructured network the hidden units differentiate into categorical-units, each of which represents an input prototype with a well-defined class; and part-units representing deformations of these prototypes. The learned organization of the recurrent encoder is hierarchical: part-units are driven di- rectly by the input, whereas the activity of categorical-units builds up over time through interactions with the part-units. Even using a small number of hidden units per layer, discriminative recurrent sparse auto-encoders achieve excellent performance on MNIST. 1 Introduction Deep networks complement the hierarchical structure in natural data (Bengio, 2009). By breaking complex calculations into many steps, deep networks can gradually build up complicated decision boundaries or input transformations, facilitate the reuse of common substructure, and explicitly com- pare alternative interpretations of ambiguous input (Lee, Ekanadham, & Ng, 2008; Zeiler, Taylor, arXiv:1301.3775v4 [cs.LG] 19 Mar 2013 & Fergus, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptron 1 History of Artificial Neural Networks
    Introduction to Machine Learning (Lecture Notes) Perceptron Lecturer: Barnabas Poczos Disclaimer: These notes have not been subjected to the usual scrutiny reserved for formal publications. They may be distributed outside this class only with the permission of the Instructor. 1 History of Artificial Neural Networks The history of artificial neural networks is like a roller-coaster ride. There were times when it was popular(up), and there were times when it wasn't. We are now in one of its very big time. • Progression (1943-1960) { First Mathematical model of neurons ∗ Pitts & McCulloch (1943) [MP43] { Beginning of artificial neural networks { Perceptron, Rosenblatt (1958) [R58] ∗ A single neuron for classification ∗ Perceptron learning rule ∗ Perceptron convergence theorem [N62] • Degression (1960-1980) { Perceptron can't even learn the XOR function [MP69] { We don't know how to train MLP { 1963 Backpropagation (Bryson et al.) ∗ But not much attention • Progression (1980-) { 1986 Backpropagation reinvented: ∗ Learning representations by back-propagation errors. Rumilhart et al. Nature [RHW88] { Successful applications in ∗ Character recognition, autonomous cars, ..., etc. { But there were still some open questions in ∗ Overfitting? Network structure? Neuron number? Layer number? Bad local minimum points? When to stop training? { Hopfield nets (1982) [H82], Boltzmann machines [AHS85], ..., etc. • Degression (1993-) 1 2 Perceptron: Barnabas Poczos { SVM: Support Vector Machine is developed by Vapnik et al.. [CV95] However, SVM is a shallow architecture. { Graphical models are becoming more and more popular { Great success of SVM and graphical models almost kills the ANN (Artificial Neural Network) research. { Training deeper networks consistently yields poor results. { However, Yann LeCun (1998) developed deep convolutional neural networks (a discriminative model).
    [Show full text]
  • Path Towards Better Deep Learning Models and Implications for Hardware
    Path towards better deep learning models and implications for hardware Natalia Vassilieva Product Manager, ML Cerebras Systems AI has massive potential, but is compute-limited today. Cerebras Systems © 2020 “Historically, progress in neural networks and deep learning research has been greatly influenced by the available hardware and software tools.” Yann LeCun, 1.1 Deep Learning Hardware: Past, Present and Future. 2019 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC 2019), 12-19 “Historically, progress in neural networks and deep learning research has been greatly influenced by the available hardware and software tools.” “Hardware capabilities and software tools both motivate and limit the type of ideas that AI researchers will imagine and will allow themselves to pursue. The tools at our disposal fashion our thoughts more than we care to admit.” Yann LeCun, 1.1 Deep Learning Hardware: Past, Present and Future. 2019 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC 2019), 12-19 “Historically, progress in neural networks and deep learning research has been greatly influenced by the available hardware and software tools.” “Hardware capabilities and software tools both motivate and limit the type of ideas that AI researchers will imagine and will allow themselves to pursue. The tools at our disposal fashion our thoughts more than we care to admit.” “Is DL-specific hardware really necessary? The answer is a resounding yes. One interesting property of DL systems is that the larger we make them, the better they seem to work.”
    [Show full text]
  • What's Wrong with Deep Learning?
    Y LeCun What's Wrong With Deep Learning? Yann LeCun Facebook AI Research & Center for Data Science, NYU [email protected] http://yann.lecun.com Plan Y LeCun Low-Level More Post- Classifier Features Features Processor The motivation for ConvNets and Deep Learning: end-to-end learning Integrating feature extractor, classifier, contextual post-processor A bit of archeology: ideas that have been around for a while Kernels with stride, non-shared local connections, metric learning... “fully convolutional” training What's missing from deep learning? 1. Theory 2. Reasoning, structured prediction 3. Memory, short-term/working/episodic memory 4. Unsupervised learning that actually works Deep Learning = Learning Hierarchical Representations Y LeCun Traditional Pattern Recognition: Fixed/Handcrafted Feature Extractor Feature Trainable Extractor Classifier Mainstream Modern Pattern Recognition: Unsupervised mid-level features Feature Mid-Level Trainable Extractor Features Classifier Deep Learning: Representations are hierarchical and trained Low-Level Mid-Level High-Level Trainable Features Features Features Classifier Early Hierarchical Feature Models for Vision Y LeCun [Hubel & Wiesel 1962]: simple cells detect local features complex cells “pool” the outputs of simple cells within a retinotopic neighborhood. “Simple cells” “Complex cells” pooling Multiple subsampling convolutions Cognitron & Neocognitron [Fukushima 1974-1982] The Mammalian Visual Cortex is Hierarchical Y LeCun The ventral (recognition) pathway in the visual cortex has multiple stages
    [Show full text]
  • Unsupervised Learning with Regularized Autoencoders
    Unsupervised Learning with Regularized Autoencoders by Junbo Zhao A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Computer Science New York University September 2019 Professor Yann LeCun c Junbo Zhao (Jake) All Rights Reserved, 2019 Dedication To my family. iii Acknowledgements To pursue a PhD has been the best decision I made in my life. First and foremost, I must thank my advisor Yann LeCun. To work with Yann, after flying half a globe from China, was indeed an unbelievable luxury. Over the years, Yann has had a huge influence on me. Some of these go far beyond research|the dedication, visionary thinking, problem-solving methodology and many others. I thank Kyunghyun Cho. We have never stopped communications during my PhD. Every time we chat, Kyunghyun is able to give away awesome advice, whether it is feedback on the research projects, startup and life. I am in his debt. I also must thank Sasha Rush and Kaiming He for the incredible collaboration experience. I greatly thank Zhilin Yang from CMU, Saizheng Zhang from MILA, Yoon Kim and Sam Wiseman from Harvard NLP for the nonstopping collaboration and friendship throughout all these years. I am grateful for having been around the NYU CILVR lab and the Facebook AI Research crowd. In particular, I want to thank Michael Mathieu, Pablo Sprechmann, Ross Goroshin and Xiang Zhang for teaching me deep learning when I was a newbie in the area. I thank Mikael Henaff, Martin Arjovsky, Cinjon Resnick, Emily Denton, Will Whitney, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Ilya Kostrikov, Jason Lee, Ilya Kulikov, Roberta Raileanu, Alex Nowak, Sean Welleck, Ethan Perez, Qi Liu and Jiatao Gu for all the fun, joyful and fruitful discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning - Review Yann Lecun, Yoshua Bengio & Geoffrey Hinton
    DEEP LEARNING - REVIEW YANN LECUN, YOSHUA BENGIO & GEOFFREY HINTON. OUTLINE • Deep Learning - History, Background & Applications. • Recent Revival. • Convolutional Neural Networks. • Recurrent Neural Networks. • Future. WHAT IS DEEP LEARNING? • A particular class of Learning Algorithms. • Rebranded Neural Networks : With multiple layers. • Inspired by the Neuronal architecture of the Brain. • Renewed interest in the area due to a few recent breakthroughs. • Learn parameters from data. • Non Linear Classification. SOME CONTEXT HISTORY • 1943 - McCulloch & Pitts develop computational model for neural network. Idea: neurons with a binary threshold activation function were analogous to first order logic sentences. • 1949 - Donald Hebb proposes Hebb’s rule Idea: Neurons that fire together, wire together! • 1958 - Frank Rosenblatt creates the Perceptron. • 1959 - Hubel and Wiesel elaborate cells in Visual Cortex. • 1975 - Paul J. Werbos develops the Backpropagation Algorithm. • 1980 - Neocognitron, a hierarchical multilayered ANN. • 1990 - Convolutional Neural Networks. APPLICATIONS • Predict the activity of potential drug molecules. • Reconstruct Brain circuits. • Predict effects of mutation on non-coding regions of DNA. • Speech/Image Recognition & Language translation MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORK COMMON NON- LINEAR FUNCTIONS: 1) F ( Z ) = MAX(0,Z ) 2) SIGMOID 3)LOGISTIC COST FUNCTION: 1/2[(YL - TL)]2 Source : Deep learning Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton Nature 521, 436–444 (28 May 2015) doi:10.1038/nature14539 STOCHASTIC GRADIENT DESCENT • Analogy: A person is stuck in the mountains and is trying to get down (i.e. trying to find the minima). • SGD: The person represents the backpropagation algorithm, and the path taken down the mountain represents the sequence of parameter settings that the algorithm will explore. The steepness of the hill represents the slope of the error surface at that point.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning
    Y LeCun Deep Learning Yann Le Cun Facebook AI Research, Center for Data Science, NYU Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, NYU http://yann.lecun.com Should We Copy the Brain to Build Intelligent Machines? Y LeCun The brain is an existence proof of intelligent machines – The way birds and bats were an existence proof of heavier-than-air flight Shouldn't we just copy it? – Like Clément Ader copied the bat? The answer is no! L'Avion III de Clément Ader, 1897 (Musée du CNAM, Paris) But we should draw His “Eole” took off from the ground in 1890, inspiration from it. 13 years before the Wright Brothers. The Brain Y LeCun 85x109 neurons 104 synapses/neuron → 1015 synapses 1.4 kg, 1.7 liters Cortex: 2500 cm2 , 2mm thick [John A Beal] 180,000 km of “wires” 250 million neurons per mm3 . All animals can learn Learning is inherent to intelligence Learning modifies the efficacies of synapses Learning causes synapses to strengthen or weaken, to appear or disappear. [Viren Jain et al.] The Brain: an Amazingly Efficient “Computer” Y LeCun 1011 neurons, approximately 104 synapses per neuron 10 “spikes” go through each synapse per second on average 1016 “operations” per second 25 Watts Very efficient 1.4 kg, 1.7 liters 2500 cm2 Unfolded cortex [Thorpe & Fabre-Thorpe 2001] Fast Processors Today Y LeCun Intel Xeon Phi CPU 2x1012 operations/second 240 Watts 60 (large) cores $3000 NVIDIA Titan-Z GPU 8x1012 operations/second 500 Watts 5760 (small) cores $3000 Are we only a factor of 10,000 away from the power of the human brain? Probably more like 1 million:
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Generative Models Shenlong Wang ● Why Unsupervised Learning?
    Deep Generative Models Shenlong Wang ● Why unsupervised learning? ● Old-school unsupervised learning Overview ○ PCA, Auto-encoder, KDE, GMM ● Deep generative models ○ VAEs, GANs Unsupervised Learning ● No labels are provided during training ● General objective: inferring a function to describe hidden structure from unlabeled data ○ Density estimation (continuous probability) ○ Clustering (discrete labels) ○ Feature learning / representation learning (continuous vectors) ○ Dimension reduction (lower-dimensional representation) ○ etc. Why Unsupervised Learning? ● Density estimation: estimate the probability density function p(x) of a random variable x, given a bunch of observations {X1, X2, ...} 2D density estimation of Stephen Curry’s shooting position Credit: BallR Why Unsupervised Learning? ● Density estimation: estimate the probability density function p(x) of a random variable x, given a bunch of observations {X1, X2, ...} Why Unsupervised Learning? ● Clustering: grouping a set of input {X1, X2, ...} in such a way that objects in the same group (called a cluster) are more similar Clustering analysis of Hall-of-fame players in NBA Credit: BallR Why Unsupervised Learning? ● Feature learning: a transformation of raw data input to a representation that can be effectively exploited in machine learning tasks 2D topological visualization given the input how similar players are with regard to points, rebounds, assists, steals, rebounds, blocks, turnovers and fouls Credit: Ayasdi Why Unsupervised Learning? ● Dimension reduction: reducing the
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Adversarial Networks (Gans)
    Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) The coolest idea in Machine Learning in the last twenty years - Yann Lecun Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 1 / 28 Introduction Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 2 / 28 Supervised Learning Find deterministic function f: y = f(x), x:data, y:label Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 3 / 28 Unsupervised Learning More challenging than supervised learning. No label or curriculum. Some NN solutions: Boltzmann machine AutoEncoder Generative Adversarial Networks Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 4 / 28 Unsupervised Learning "Most of human and animal learning is unsupervised learning. If intelligence was a cake, unsupervised learning would be the cake, supervised learning would be the icing on the cake, and reinforcement learning would be the cherry on the cake. We know how to make the icing and the cherry, but we do not know how to make the cake. We need to solve the unsupervised learning problem before we can even think of getting to true AI." - Yann Lecun "What I cannot create, I do not understand" - Richard P. Feynman Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 5 / 28 Generative Models Introduction What does "generative" mean? You can sample from the model and the distribution of samples approximates the distribution of true data points To build a sampler, do we need to optimize the log-likelihood? Does this sampler work? Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 6 / 28 Generative Adversarial Networks Desired Properties of the Sampler What is wrong with the sampler? Why is not desired? Desired
    [Show full text]