The Dynamics and Diversity of Space Use in the British Library
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ITU A|Z • Vol 12 No 3 • November 2015 • 23-39 Te dynamics and diversity of space use in the British Library Kerstin SAILER [email protected] • Space Syntax Laboratory, Te Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London, 140 Hampstead Road, London NW1 2BX, United Kingdom Received: September 2015 Final Acceptance: October 2015 Abstract Te Space Syntax study of buildings typically distinguishes between weak and strong programming, where social behaviours either follow or defy the spatial logic of a building. Tis is ofen based on analysing collective and aggregate pat- terns of behaviour. Tis paper builds on recent work redefning our understand- ing of weak and strong programming, yet aims to analyse usage patterns and spatial afordances in a much more fne-grained way by taking diversity of user groups as well as the temporal unfolding of behaviours into account. Te British Library acts as a case study and is investigated based on a rich empirical dataset of observed user behaviours. Results suggest that the British Library shows both strong and weak program- ming: movement fows only partially followed spatial confguration, and the in- terface the building constructed kept people apart rather than bringing them to- gether. In addition, large variations in user activities existed in some parts of the Library, all of which points towards strong programming. At the same time how- ever, certain activities showed clear spatial preferences and signifcant diferences in local and global visibility patterns, which illustrates weak programming. It was also shown how dynamic and diverse user behaviours emerged in the British Li- brary, highlighting the need to draw a nuanced picture of usage. Te contribution of the paper thus lies in a detailed and deep analysis of usage patterns, unpacking variations in behaviours between diferent users at diferent times and linking this both to the afordances of confguration as well as programmatic infuences. Keywords Public libraries, Space syntax, Space usage, Temporal dynamics, Strong and weak programming. 24 1. Introduction: More than just If we consider buildings based on books… usage, change becomes essential. Pub- Buildings are dynamic settings lic libraries, like most other building that accommodate a range of difer- types have seen a dramatic change in ent uses. A hospital for instance is how they are used, perceived and ex- not just a place for curing the ill, but perienced. Te increasing digitisation also a workplace for nurses, doctors, of content means that new ways of ac- cleaners and porters (see for instance cessing collections emerge, thus shif- Heo, Choudhary, Bafna, Hendrich, ing the necessity of a physical site away & Chow, 2009 on nurses assignments from providing access and towards and behavioural patterns). A school other uses. Drawing on a study of 24 not only enables teaching and learning, recently built monumental public li- but is also an important place for so- brary buildings, Shoham and Yablonka cialisation, making friends and hang- (2008) came to the conclusion that the ing out (Minuchin & Shapiro, 1983; new-built libraries had increased user Sailer, 2015). Shops have clear social numbers, were full of life and served functions beyond their retail purpose wider purposes as symbols of culture, (Koch, 2014). Museums do not only as tourist attractions, but also as pleas- exhibit pieces of art, but also educate, ant meeting places in a quiet cultured entertain and sell merchandise (Kwon environment. & Sailer, 2015). Likewise, libraries have Te British Library forms a partic- always been meeting places for com- ularly interesting case in this context. munities in addition to storing books Te architect of the British Library, and organising access to information Sir Colin St John Wilson (1998) de- (Capille & Psarra, 2015). scribed the multitude of functions to All of the above descriptions cen- be accommodated as: a day-to-day tre on what people do in buildings. workplace, an institution that embod- Indeed, most buildings are defned by ies and celebrates national memory, a functions or so called ‘use types’ (For- storage of collections, places of study, ty, 2000) or ‘activity types’ (Steadman, exhibitions of its treasures, an event- 2014): a hospital is a hospital because space hosting lectures and seminars, of what happens there, and likewise and back-of-house functions such as a school is a school again because of conservation laboratories and admin- what goes on inside it (Hillier, Hanson, istration. Tis already points to a real & Peponis, 1984). diversity of space usage patterns. How Yet, it seems that what people do the publicly accessible areas of the Li- in buildings becomes even more im- brary are indeed used in their every- portant, as a new focus on the human day functioning will be explored in side of architecture as well as on peo- this paper, drawing on a rich data set ple’s experiences, behaviours and us- of empirical and both quantitative and age patterns can be observed in recent qualitative participant observations, discourses. Te question of usage and collected in 2009 and 2010 by MSc daily life has already been popular in students at the Bartlett, UCL. It will be the 1970’s with architects like Herman asked how people move around in the Hertzberger defning architecture as building, to which degree the spatial concerned with ‘daily life lived by all layout (analysed with Space Syntax) people’ (Hertzberger, 1991), however informs usage patterns and how usage only recently, scholars have argued that varies between diferent user groups, the social agenda of architecture has but also over time. Its main aim is to too long been a blind spot that needs provide a sketch of the multi-function- re-addressing (Cupers, 2013). Other ality of the building and describe user recent publications on usage and the groups and usage patterns in as much social role of architecture and design detail and variation as possible. Tis is (Awan, Schneider, & Till, 2011; Berg- an important task, if we want to refect doll, 2010; Maudlin & Vellinga, 2014; on how to design ‘social’ buildings in Till, 2009) underlined the import- the future, where usage and people’s ant reading of buildings as ‘lived in’ activities, preferences and experienc- (Brand, 1994; Hollis, 2009). es are actively anticipated, embedded, ITU A|Z • Vol 12 No 3 • November 2015 • K. Sailer 25 and allowed to grow and change. of a strong programme building, since Tis paper is structured as follows: diferent user groups with varying de- Chapter 2 will provide theoretical grees of inhabitant or visitor status foundations for the empirical explora- such as judges, barristers, witnesses, tions of usage patterns in the British Li- defendants and public were channelled brary by sketching research on library through the building along separat- buildings and human behaviours, but ed paths so that their movement was also by elaborating on the Space Syn- highly controlled and encounters were tax theory of ‘strong and weak pro- actively hindered until all users met gramming’ in buildings. Chapter 3 in the highly orchestrated and ritual- will introduce the British Library as a ised court room proceedings (Hanson, case study, followed by a detailed de- 1996). In contrast, buildings were seen scription of methodology in Chapter as weakly programmed if the interface 4. In four consecutive steps, Chapter 5 between user groups was not con- will discuss the diversity and dynam- trolled and everyone could encounter ics of usage patterns in the British Li- everyone else freely, following ‘short brary and a fnal Chapter 6 will draw models’ with a high degree of randomi- conclusions, discuss limitations of the sation and morphogenesis (Hillier & study and provide an outline of future Hanson, 1984). Te most used example research in the feld. for traditionally weakly programmed buildings was the editorial foor of a 2. Usage patterns and building types: newspaper, which fourished through On strong and weak programming generative and unstructured encoun- In their paper ‘Visible Colleges’ Hill- ters among diferent users. ier and Penn (1991) conceptualised Te implications of this theory for buildings as either strongly or weakly the understanding of buildings and programmed depending on the de- usage patterns lie mainly in the ques- gree to which the activity patterns in- tion how closely movement fows and side the buildings followed strict rules, resulting patterns of encounter corre- procedures and models. Tis theory is spond to spatial confguration. Tradi- crucial in understanding the relation- tional Space Syntax theory would sug- ship between spatial layout and usage gest that movement fows are highest patterns inside diferent building types. in areas of high spatial integration – so A programme was defned as “not called ‘natural movement’ (Hillier & the organisation it houses (…) [but] the Iida, 2005; Hillier, Penn, Hanson, Gra- spatial dimension of an organisation, jewski, & Xu, 1993), however, adding and the key element in any programme strong and weak programming, we is the interface, or interfaces, that the would only expect this relationship to building exists to construct (…) [i.e.] the hold in the case of weak programming, spatial relation between or among two where randomisation is at play and broad categories of persons (…) that the layout can act morphogenetical- every building defnes: inhabitants, or ly. In contrast, it could be argued that those whose social identity as individu- movement fows follow programme in als is embedded in the spatial layout and strongly programmed buildings. who therefore have some degree of con- Over recent years, the theory of trol of space; and visitors, who lack con- strong and weak programming was trol, whose identities in the building are taken up by diferent researchers and collective, usually temporary and sub- articulated further, for instance Koch ordinated to those of the inhabitants”. and Steen (2012) proposed a new cri- (Hillier & Penn, 1991, p.