Everything in Di Dark Muss Come to Light: a Postcolonial Investigation of the Practice of Extra Lessons at the Secondary Level in Jamaica's Education System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2013 Everything in di Dark Muss Come to Light: A Postcolonial Investigation of the Practice of Extra Lessons at the Secondary Level in Jamaica's Education System Saran Stewart University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Caribbean Languages and Societies Commons, and the Secondary Education Commons Recommended Citation Stewart, Saran, "Everything in di Dark Muss Come to Light: A Postcolonial Investigation of the Practice of Extra Lessons at the Secondary Level in Jamaica's Education System" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1000. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1000 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. EVERYTHING IN DI DARK MUSS COME TO LIGHT: A POSTCOLONIAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRACTICE OF EXTRA LESSONS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL IN JAMAICA’S EDUCATION SYSTEM ______________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Morgridge College of Education University of Denver ______________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________ by Saran Stewart August 2013 Advisor: Frank Tuitt, Ph.D. ©Copyright by Saran Stewart 2013 All Rights Reserved Author: Saran Stewart Title: EVERYTHING IN DI DARK MUSS COME TO LIGHT: A POSTCOLONIAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRACTICE OF EXTRA LESSONS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL IN JAMAICA’S EDUCATION SYSTEM Advisor: Frank Tuitt, Ph.D. Degree Date: August 2013 ABSTRACT Despite the vast research examining the evolution of Caribbean education systems, little is chronologically tied to the postcolonial theoretical perspectives of specific island-state systems, such as the Jamaican education system and its relationship with the underground shadow education system. This dissertation study sought to address the gaps in the literature by critically positioning postcolonial theories in education to examine the macro- and micro-level impacts of extra lessons on secondary education in Jamaica. The following postcolonial theoretical (PCT) tenets in education were contextualized from a review of the literature: (a) PCT in education uses colonial discourse analysis to critically deconstruct and decolonize imperialistic and colonial representations of knowledge throughout history; (b) PCT in education uses an anti- colonial discursive framework to re-position indigenous knowledge in schools, colleges, and universities to challenge hegemonic knowledge; (c) PCT in education involves the “unlearning” of dominant, normative ideologies, the use of self-reflexivity, and deconstruction; and (d) PCT in education calls for critical pedagogical approaches that reject the banking concept of education and introduces inclusive pedagogy to facilitate “the passage from naïve to critical transitivity” (Freire, 1973, p. 32). Specifically, using a transformative mixed-methods design, grounded and informed by a postcolonial ii theoretical lens, I quantitatively uncovered and then qualitatively highlighted how if at all extra lessons can improve educational outcomes for students at the secondary level in Jamaica. Accordingly, the quantitative data was used to test the hypotheses that the practice of extra lessons in schools is related to student academic achievement and the practice of critical-inclusive pedagogy in extra lessons is related to academic achievement. The two-level hierarchical linear model analysis revealed that hours spent in extra lessons, average household monthly income, and critical-inclusive pedagogical tents were the best predictors for academic achievement. Alternatively, the holistic multi-case study explored how extra-lessons produces increased academic achievement. The data revealed new ways of knowledge construction and critical pedagogical approaches to galvanize systemic change in secondary education. Furthermore, the data showed that extra lessons can improve educational outcomes for students at the secondary level if the conditions for learning are met. This study sets the stage for new forms of knowledge construction and implications for policy change. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I express my deepest gratitude and sincerest appreciation to my family, friends, mentors, committee members, and most of all, my participants and gatekeepers who supported me throughout the years. Without you, this journey would not have been possible or completed. I encourage all of you to read Chapter 7 that details the dedication of this dissertation and acknowledgement of my work. Lastly, I recognize and salute the sacrifices of those who have paved the road to academia and made it possible for emerging scholars such as myself to follow suit. For those who follow, stay focused, transparent, and accountable in your pursuit of education as the practice of freedom. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………...…1 Context and Problem Statement ………………………………………………….2 Purpose and Research Questions ………………………………………................5 Postcolonial Theoretical Perspective ……………………………………...…..….6 Postcolonial Theoretical Framework ……………………………………………..8 Postcolonial Theories……………………………………………………...8 Foundations of Postcolonial Theories …………………………...10 Postcolonial Theories in Education……………………………………...11 Deconstruction and Re-Presentation of Traditional Eurocentric and Western Curriculum ………………………………………...13 Anti-Colonial Discursive Framework …………………………...14 Unlearning Normative Ideologies by Using Self-Reflexivity and Deconstruction ……………………………………………...15 Critical-Inclusive Pedagogy……………………………………..16 Application of Postcolonial Theories in Education Throughout the Dissertation Study……………………………………………………….19 CHAPTER 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE………………………………………24 Social History of the Education of Jamaica……………………………………...24 Education Under British Rule (1655-1962)……………………………...25 Pre-Emancipation (1655-1834)…………………………………..25 Contextualizing Slavery in Education…………………………...25 Post-Emancipation (1834-1962)…………………………………………36 Establishment of the University of the West Indies……………..49 Post-Independence to the Present (1962-Present)………………………..52 Importance of Patois……………………………………………..55 Caribbean Examination Council…………………………………57 Research Setting: Current State of Jamaica’s Education System.…………….....59 Curriculum……………………………………………………………….62 Major Problems and Challenges…………………………………………63 CSEC Results…………………………………………………….64 Transformational Change………………………………………………………..65 Understanding Extra Lessons…………………………………………....66 Characteristics of Private Tutoring………………………………………68 Supply and Demand of Shadow Education……………………………...70 Educational, Social, and Economic Impact……………………………...71 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………73 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………….76 Rationale for Choosing Mixed Methods Approach ……………………………..78 Paradigmatic, Methodological Assumptions, and Worldviews………….80 v Reasons for Mixed Methods Design……………………………………..82 Triangulation……………………………………………………..83 Complementarity…………………………………………………83 Initiation………………………………………………………….83 Offset…………………………………………………………….83 Completeness…………………………………………………….84 Different Research Questions…………………………………....84 Credibility………………………………………………………..84 Context…………………………………………………………..84 Mixed Methods Approach……………………………………………….85 Level of Interaction………………………………………………85 Priority of the Strands………………………………...………….86 Timing of the Strands…………………………………………….86 Procedure for Mixing the Strands………………………………..86 Mixed Methods Designs ………………………………………...87 Research Design………………………………………………………………….89 Dissertation Setting……………………………………………………....90 Transformative Design …………………………………………………..93 Mixed Methods Data Collection…………………………………………96 Mixed Methods Data Analysis…………………………………………...96 Quantitative Methodology……………………………………………….97 Sample……………………………………………………………97 Instrument………………………………………………………..99 Procedures ………………………………………………...........106 School Data……………………………………………………..108 Data Analysis…………………………………………………...108 Hierarchical Linear Model……………………………...109 Second Stage of Interface………………………………………………114 Qualitative Methodology……………………………………………….115 Case Study…………………………………………...................115 Types of Case Studies…………………………………………..117 Case Selection…………………………………………………..118 Case Study Design……………………………………………...119 Case Study Approaches………………………………………...119 Sample: Participants and Cases ………………………..…...….120 Data Collection ………………………………………………...124 Data Analysis …………………………………………………..127 Third Stage of Interface: Mixed Methods Analysis and Interpretation ..131 Trustworthiness: Validation and Reliability …………………………………...132 Positionality…………………………………………………………………….133 Summary………………………………………………………………………..135 CHAPTER 4. QUANTITATIVE RESULTS…………………………………………..137 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations…………………………………………137 vi Omission of Variable…………………………………………………...139 School-Level Data ……………………………………………………..139 Scope and Prevalence ………………………………………………….141 Education Outcomes……………………………………………………144 Critical-Inclusive Pedagogical Framework……………………………..151 Socioeconomic Implications……………………………………………155 Results for Academic Achievement……………………………………………157 Assumptions……………………………………………………………157 Normality……………………………………………………….157 Multicollinearity ……………………………………………….161 Linearity ……………………………………………………….161 Distribution of