Douglas Macarthur and Hubris

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Douglas Macarthur and Hubris Activity: Mind Map of Hubris 1. Assign students to groups of 4 or 5. Have them take out a sheet of paper and draw a mind map with hubris at the center of the diagram. Then, students should explain draw lines to four to six vices that result from hubris and a brief explanation of why. 2. Then, ask the students in their groups to list an important real person or fictional character for each of the vices they tied to hubris. 3. Ask the students to share their reasoning about why a vice might result from hubris, which person/character they chose to represent the vice, and why? Ask: How did hubris lead to the downfall of the person/character? 4. As a large group, ask the students the central question and briefly discuss: Can a hero sometimes fall because of a character flaw related to pride? Explain. © THE BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE HUBRIS Douglas MacArthur and Hubris eneral Douglas MacArthur always stirred up of the Philippines, President Franklin Roosevelt Gcontroversy because of conflicting virtues was forced to order MacArthur to abandon his sol- and vices in his character. He loved serving diers, thousands of whom died in the Bataan Death his country in the military and usually did so March. MacArthur boldly promised the Filipinos, brilliantly and courageously. Consequently, he was “I shall return!” when he finally obeyed the presi- a highly-decorated soldier and became a hero to dent’s order and departed in March for the safety of millions of Americans during World War II and Australia. the Korean War. On the other hand, he could be The American people thought the general was vain and arrogant, believing only he was right and a hero for defiantly fighting the Japanese against seeking public adulation for his accomplishments. overwhelming odds. General Dwight Eisenhower His hubris, or excessive pride or arrogance, led wrote, “I hope he can do the miracles expected MacArthur to challenge the authority of the and predicted; we could use a few [heroes] right president and threaten the republican principle of now.” As commander of the Southwest Pacific, military deference to the civilian government. MacArthur performed great deeds in reversing On December 7, 1941, Japan launched a sur- Japanese conquests. He advocated reconquering prise attack on Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, the Philippines both because he thought it was American Midway, Wake and Guam Islands, Brit- strategically sound and because he wished to ish Hong Kong, Malaya, and other Pacific targets. remove the perception of personal dishonor from This was an important step in Japan’s strategy to his humiliating exit. In 1944, MacArthur invaded rapidly build a large Pacific empire. General Ma- the Philippines with the second largest amphibious cArthur had attempted to prepare the Philippines force after the D-Day invasion in Normandy. for an attack, but within a few weeks the Japanese MacArthur bravely went onto the most dangerous army routed his overwhelmed forces all the way beach with reporters in tow for photographs. to the Bataan Peninsula. Even though He soon proclaimed “I have returned!” MacArthur bravely endured air at- This expression reflected his view tacks on the island fortress of that he was the guardian of the Corregidor, his men satirized Philippines and had pressed him as “Dugout Doug.” the Allied command and American losses continued President Roosevelt to in the Philippines as the rescue the Filipinos from Japanese seized Manila Japanese domination. in January. By February, However, MacArthur knowing he could not af- could be imperious and ford to have General Ma- disrespectful towards his cArthur captured as the fellow commanders and Japanese took possession even the president. He HEROES & VILLAINS: THE QUEST FOR CIVIC VIRTUE strutted around in a signature leather jacket, Field the United States would have to stand up against Marshall cap, sunglasses, and corncob pipe. He communist powers. MacArthur’s position was that struggled with other American generals and admi- the United Nations force should press its advantage rals over command, strategy, and supplies, though by annihilating Chinese forces in North Korea and he made significant contributions to the eventual bombing targets inside Manchuria. His hubris Allied victory in World War II. After a meeting in strained relations with the civilian authorities as he which MacArthur was disrespectful with the presi- expected everyone, including the commander-in- dent, Roosevelt stated, “In all my life nobody has chief, to yield to him. ever talked to me the way MacArthur did.” In short, As his army marched northward, MacArthur was his hubris and desire for military glory often over- annoyed to be pulled from the war zone when sum- shadowed his real accomplishments. Nevertheless, moned by the president to an election-year meeting MacArthur continued to provide important service on Wake Island, where MacArthur would report on to the United States by supervising the reconstruc- the progress of the war and Truman would person- tion of Japan following the war. ally clarify the difference between a general and a When Communist North Korea’s army crossed commander-in-chief. The irate general deliberately the 38th Parallel in a surprise invasion of South snubbed Truman several times during the confer- Korea in June, 1950, President Harry Truman named ence. MacArthur met Truman at his plane and of- MacArthur the supreme commander of the allied fered a handshake instead of greeting the president forces under the authority of the United Nations with a salute when he stepped off the plane. Dur- (UN). All of the contradictions in his character ing private and public meetings, MacArthur could came to the fore. After the North Koreans pushed barely hide his contempt for Truman and gave rude allied forces south across the Korean peninsula to a answers to his questions. Finally, the general turned tiny pocket called the Pusan Perimeter, MacArthur down a lunch invitation and departed. launched a brilliant amphibious landing at Inchon MacArthur’s drive to the north pushed the behind the North Korean forces. MacArthur went on North Korean army past the point established by the offensive and his armies drove northward again, the UN as the northernmost line he was authorized across the 38th Parallel with explicit authorization to attack. When the Joint Chiefs expressed their from the UN and the approval of President Harry concern and also ordered him not to bomb targets Truman. Indeed, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) too close to the Chinese border, MacArthur shot informed MacArthur that, “Your military objective back a blistering and insubordinate reply against is the destruction of the North Korea armed forces.” their timidity. The Chinese then sent hundreds In late September, the Secretary of Defense, George of thousands of troops against the allied forces in Marshall, informed him, “We want you to feel October. MacArthur responded by attacking the unhampered strategically and tactically to proceed bridges on the Yalu, and again the JCS ordered north of the 38th Parallel.” Therefore, MacArthur him to stop. The general admonished his superiors felt empowered to pursue the enemy through North for issuing orders he believed threatened the Korea to the Yalu River, which was the border the destruction of his army. Meanwhile, U.S. forces Communist China. Truman’s policy objective heroically fought desperate battles in bitter cold was to demonstrate the United States and United and barely repulsed the massive Chinese invasion, Nations commitment to protect the integrity of though the U.S. forces were slowly forced to retreat South Korea, without antagonizing the government all the way back to South Korea. of Communist China. MacArthur viewed this MacArthur was embarrassed by the defeat since strategy of limited war with disdain, and publicly he had recently predicted that the troops would criticized the president’s approach, maintaining be coming home for Christmas. He gave a media that the Korean conflict was the best opportunity interview in which he blamed the defeat on the © THE BILL OF RIGHTS INSTITUTE handicaps placed upon him by the administration. the American people supported him and gave him MacArthur also held a press conference and a hero’s welcome in the United States. He addressed predicted a “savage slaughter” if he were not given Congress and tens of millions of people in a tearful greater leeway over the rules of engagement. A few farewell that was broadcast on television and radio. weeks later, he threatened to cross the 38th Parallel He reviewed his career, criticized American strategy again into North Korea (contrary to orders) and in Korea, and dramatically ended the speech with offered to meet with the Chinese commander to offer the phrase, “Old soldiers never die, they just fade his own terms for a cease-fire (thereby bypassing away.” Surprisingly, for a general who had exhibited the diplomatic efforts of the administration). such vanity in his career, he did gradually “fade Frustrated with the administration’s pursuit of away” from American public life before he died in a limited-war strategy geared toward a cease- 1964. fire, the general publicly promised to pursue the General MacArthur dedicated his life to enemy anywhere in Korea and roundly defeat him. public service in the military and was a heroic Although his military views were not far from commander. However, he was often self-serving the Allied commanders and President Truman, and self-promoting. He was consistently arrogant MacArthur believed too much in his own greatness, in dealing with his commander-in-chief, who has and his vanity led him to rank insubordination. constitutional authority over the military, and The last straw came when MacArthur wrote superior officers. He was often insubordinate and a letter to the Speaker of the House criticizing threatened to upset the proper respect accorded the the administration and asserting that, “There civilian authorities by members of the military as is no substitute for victory.” President Truman established by precedent since George Washington.
Recommended publications
  • George Washington and George Marshall: Some Reflections on the American Military Tradition” Don Higginbotham, 1984
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #26 “George Washington and George Marshall: Some Reflections on the American Military Tradition” Don Higginbotham, 1984 Though this is my second visit to the Air Force Academy, it is my first opportunity to present an address. I have had more exposure in this regard to one of your sister institutions: West Point. I must be careful not to speak of you as army men and women; but if I forget it will not be out of partiality. Gen. George Marshall at times was amused and at other times irritated by the partiality shown for the Navy by President Franklin Roosevelt, whom you may recall loved the sea and had been assistant secretary of the navy in the Wilson administration. On one occasion Marshall had had enough and pleaded good humoredly, "At least, Mr. President, stop speaking of the Army as 'they' and the Navy as ‘us’!” The title of this lecture suggests the obvious: that I consider it informative and instructive to look at certain similarities of experience and attitude shared by George Washington and George Marshall. In so doing, I want to speculate on their place in the American military tradition. These introductory remarks sound as though I am searching for relevance, and that is the case. No doubt at times historians, to say nothing of their readers, wish that the contemporary world would get lost so as to leave them unfettered to delve into the past for its own sake.
    [Show full text]
  • General Douglas Macarthur S Private Correspondence, 1848-1964
    Guide to the Microfilm Edition RG-10: GENERAL DOUGLAS MACARTHUR S PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE, 1848-1964 Filmed from the holdings of the MacArthur Memorial Archives Norfolk, Virginia A Microfilm Publication by Scholarly Resources Inc. An Imprint of Thomson Gale Scholarly Resources Inc. An Imprint of Thomson Gale 12 Lunar Drive, Woodbridge, CT 06525 Tel: (800) 444-0799 and (203) 397-2600 Fax: (203) 397-3893 P.O. Box 45, Reading, England Tel: (+44) 1734-583247 Fax: (+44) 1734-394334 ISBN: 0-8420-4358-6 All rights reserved, including those to reproduce this microfilm guide or any parts thereof in any form Printed and bound in the United States of America 2006 Table of Contents Biographical Essay Douglas MacArthur, iv Introduction to the Collection, vii Reel Contents to RG-10: General Douglas MacArthur s Private Correspondence, 1848-1964, 1 Biographical Essay Douglas MacArthur Douglas MacArthur was born in Little Rock, Arkansas, on January 26, 1880, to Captain (later Lieutenant General) Arthur MacArthur and Mary Pinkney Hardy MacArthur of Norfolk, Virginia. Douglas was the youngest of three sons. The eldest, Arthur, went to the U.S. Naval Academy and died in 1923, a captain in the Navy; Malcolm died in childhood in 1883 and is buried in Norfolk. Douglas and his family lived on various military posts from New Mexico to Fort Leavenworth to Washington, DC. In 1899 he was appointed to the U.S. Military Academy from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. After graduating first in his class from West Point, where he held the highest rank in the Corps of Cadets, MacArthur was commissioned second lieutenant, Corps of Engineers, on June 11, 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • Macarthur, DOUGLAS: Papers, 1930-41
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS MacARTHUR, DOUGLAS: Papers, 1930-41 Accession: 03-17 Processed by: TB Date Completed: June 24, 2003 The microfilm copy of the papers of Douglas MacArthur, 1935-41 were deposited in the Eisenhower Library by the General Douglas MacArthur Memorial Archives and Library in June, 2003. Approximate number of items: 3 reels of microfilm The original documents remain with the General Douglas MacArthur Memorial Archives and Library of Norfolk, Virginia as RG-1 Records of the U.S. Military Advisor to the Philippine Commonwealth, 1935-1941. Researchers should contact that repository directly regarding copyright restrictions. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE This collection consists of microfilm copies of correspondence, orders, speeches, reports, newspaper clippings and other printed material relating to MacArthur’s work as military adviser to the Philippine Commonwealth during 1935-41. This collection contains materials relating to the creation of a Philippine Army, Philippine Defense, Philippine politics, and general correspondence with MacArthur’s contemporaries. This collection is described at the document or case file level; each folder description contains many individual entries. Reels 1 and 2 contain documents within the MacArthur papers; some of these letters and telegrams are authenticated copies, and not originals. Reel 3 contains photocopies of selected documents from the Official Military Personnel File of Douglas MacArthur, also known as a “201” file. The original documents currently are held by the National Archives and Records Administration at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, but the documents contained in this microfilm were copied when the file was housed at the Washington National Record Center in Suitland, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-Sins-Fall-17-Reviewed.Pdf
    Fall 2017 Syllabus Honors Seminar VI 1178-IDH 3034- RVE #87808, Fully Online General Information | Important Information | Course Detail | Course Calendar General Information Professor Information Photo by Jean-Michele Instructor: Prof. Mary Lou Pfeiffer, LL.M., MA Phone:305-348-4100, The Honors College (MMC- DM 233) Fax: 305-348-2118 Office: OE 165 Office Hours: By appointment Email: Please use course email or if necessary [email protected] Course Description, Course Purpose Upper division Honors “Aesthetics, Values and Authority” fully online The Seven Deadly Sins [“Seven” is referenced hereafter using the Arabic number 7] is a fully online, 2 semester- 3 credits/semester- Honors course that investigates a 3-letter word, "sin," and its evolution into the list of the 7 deadly [capital/mortal] sins: anger, envy, gluttony, greed, lust, pride and sloth, that are central to moral philosophy and human behavior. They have been examined through art, music and literature for more than fifteen hundred years, and recently through multimedia and texts. The course provides the student with a background to recognize, define and analyze the 7 sins, their historical roots and corresponding virtues as they emerged from Eastern and Western societies throughout written history. Oxford University Press/New York Public Library produced books for each sin from the following authors: Dyson, Epstein, Wasserman, Prose, Tickle, Thurman and Blackburn. These and another text, Sin: the Early History of an Idea by Paula Fredriksen, explore the complexity of sin and how it affects humanity. In addition to the texts, students are required to view films/DVD’s throughout the course posted online accompanied by works of art, music, and electronic reading material.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy & Social Criticism
    Philosophy & Social Criticism http://psc.sagepub.com/ Apathy: the democratic disease Jeffrey E. Green Philosophy Social Criticism 2004 30: 745 DOI: 10.1177/0191453704045763 The online version of this article can be found at: http://psc.sagepub.com/content/30/5-6/745 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Philosophy & Social Criticism can be found at: Email Alerts: http://psc.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://psc.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Dec 6, 2004 What is This? Downloaded from psc.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA on May 6, 2013 12 045763 (to/d) 2/9/04 11:38 am Page 745 Jeffrey E. Green Apathy: the democratic disease Abstract This essay turns to ancient sources in order to rethink the relation- ship between political apathy and democracy. If modern democratic theorists place political apathy entirely outside of democracy – either as a destructive limit upon the full realization of a democratic polity, or, more sanguinely, as a pragmatic necessity which tempers democracy so that it may function in a workable yet watered-down form – the ancients conceived of political apathy as a peculiarly democratic phenomenon that was likely to flourish in tandem with the expansion of egalitarian institutional structures and moral ideas. Evidence for the ancient recognition of political apathy as a uniquely demo- cratic kind of affliction centers on, but is not limited to, three main sources. In literature, the Homeric epic, and specifically the story of Achilles, present apathy for politics and commitment to human equality as synonymous forces.
    [Show full text]
  • George C. Marshall: the Last Great American?
    Reprinted, with permission, from Followed by bis dog.,F1eet, the· Army SMITHSONIAN Magbine, August 1997 ChiefofstQ,ffbritJIy escapes his military issue. @ 1997, Smithsonian Institution. cares by riding at Fort Myer in 1941. GEORGE C. MARSHALL THE LAST GREAT MERICAN? BY LANCE MORROW be true. But when I put Washington and Marshall side by side, and look at them against the background of the NO SOLDIER SINCE WASHINGTON HAS HAD HIS ROMAN national leadership now in office, it is VIRTUES, AND SO SIGNIFICANTLY SHAPED A PEACE easy to think that I am looking at the first American grown-up-and the last. As much as any man, Marshall saved IN MY MIND, A DIAGRAM OF AMERICAN is unfair, perhaps. Custer's curtain call world democracy at the moment of its military history might begin with a was an act ofself-immolating folly; Pat­ greatest danger. He took up his duties parallelogram of Georges-George ton, by contrast, was a brilliant tacti­ as U.S. Army Chief of Staff on Sep­ Washington and George Marshall; cian and a superb combat leader who tember 1, 1939, the day that Hitler George Armstrong Custer and George redeemed his excesses when he marched into Poland. He began with Patton. A geometry of paired oppo­ brought the Third Army slashing an absurdly ill-equipped army of sites. In some ways, George Marshall is across Europe toward Hitler's throat. 174,000 men, ranking 17th in the world the best of them all. The other two sides of the parallelo­ behind such nations as Bulgaria and Custer and Patton are the Hotspur gram, the Stoic Georges, shaped larger Portugal, and turned it into a global sides-martial peacocks, brave, vain­ American business.
    [Show full text]
  • 10, George C. Marshall
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #10 “George C. Marshall: Global Commander” Forrest C. Pogue, 1968 It is a privilege to be invited to give the tenth lecture in a series which has become widely-known among teachers and students of military history. I am, of course, delighted to talk with you about Gen. George C. Marshall with whose career I have spent most of my waking hours since1956. Douglas Freeman, biographer of two great Americans, liked to say that he had spent twenty years in the company of Gen. Lee. After devoting nearly twelve years to collecting the papers of General Marshall and to interviewing him and more than 300 of his contemporaries, I can fully appreciate his point. In fact, my wife complains that nearly any subject from food to favorite books reminds me of a story about General Marshall. If someone serves seafood, I am likely to recall that General Marshall was allergic to shrimp. When I saw here in the audience Jim Cate, professor at the University of Chicago and one of the authors of the official history of the U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II, I recalled his fondness for the works of G.A. Henty and at once there came back to me that Marshall once said that his main knowledge of Hannibal came from Henty's The Young Carthaginian. If someone asks about the General and Winston Churchill, I am likely to say, "Did you know that they first met in London in 1919 when Marshall served as Churchill's aide one afternoon when the latter reviewed an American regiment in Hyde Park?" Thus, when I mentioned to a friend that I was coming to the Air Force Academy to speak about Marshall, he asked if there was much to say about the General's connection with the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout #4: Eisenhower and His Times
    Handout #4: Eisenhower and His Times 1890 Dwight David Eisenhower is born on October 14 in Denison, Texas, the third son of Ida and David Eisenhower. “If we were poor-and I’m not sure that we were by the standards of the day- we were unaware of it. All in all, we were a cheerful family. We would have been insulted had anyone offered us charity: instead my mother was always ready to take home remedies or food and start out to help the sick.” --Dwight D. Eisenhower, In Review: Pictures I’ve Kept, 1969 1891 Eisenhower family moves to Abilene, Kansas, a small farm town. Dwight grows up as the third of six brothers. “You get to meet anyone face to face with whom you disagree.” --Dwight D. Eisenhower, quoted in Relman Morin, Dwight D. Eisenhower, A Gauge of Greatness, 1969 1907 Eisenhower is an outstanding high school athlete, playing football and baseball. “I believe that football…tends to instill in men the feeling that victory comes through hard—almost slavish—work.” --Eisenhower, At Ease: Stories I Tell to Friends, 1967 1909 Eisenhower graduates from high school. He does not have the money to go to college. “[My father’s]…sterling honesty, his insistence upon the immediate payment of all debts, his pride in his independence earned for him a reputation that has profited all of us boys. Because of it, all central Kansas helped me to secure an appointment to West Point in 1911.” --Eisenhower, Diaries, March 12, 1942, the day his father is buried 17 1911-1915 Eisenhower wins an appointment to West Point and takes the oath as a plebe.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Material Account of Babyloss Narratives: Authorship
    TOWARD A MATERIAL ACCOUNT OF BABYLOSS NARRATIVES: AUTHORSHIP, IDENTIFIABILITY, AND EMBEDDEDNESS IN COLLECTIVE STORYTELLING by Janel C. Atlas A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Summer 2020 ©2020 Janel Atlas All Rights Reserved TOWARD A MATERIAL ACCOUNT OF BABYLOSS NARRATIVES: AUTHORSHIP, IDENTIFIABILITY, AND EMBEDDEDNESS IN COLLECTIVE STORYTELLING by Janel Atlas Approved: ______________________________________________________________ John Ernest, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of English Approved: ______________________________________________________________ John Pelesko, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: ______________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education and Dean of the Graduate College I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: _____________________________________________________ Stephanie Kerschbaum, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed:_____________________________________________________ Melissa Ianetta, Ph.D. Member
    [Show full text]
  • WHEREAS, on February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt 1
    SENATE RESOLUTION 8617 By Senators Hasegawa, Hobbs, Brown, Dammeier, Roach, and Chase 1 WHEREAS, On February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt 2 issued Executive Order 9066 which authorized the military to forcibly 3 remove and incarcerate more than 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry 4 from the West Coast, including 12,000 Japanese-American residents of 5 Washington State; and 6 WHEREAS, The first Civilian Evacuation Order gave Japanese- 7 Americans from Bainbridge Island less than one week to leave behind 8 homes, farms, businesses, friends, and family and to report to 9 hastily constructed detention centers like Camp Harmony on the 10 grounds of the Western Washington Fair in Puyallup; and 11 WHEREAS, This drastic course of action allegedly aimed to prevent 12 acts of espionage and sabotage by Japanese-Americans who were deemed 13 untrustworthy and disloyal to the United States; and 14 WHEREAS, On March 23, 1943, the War Department organized a 15 segregated unit of Japanese-Americans, many of whom reported for 16 military duty from concentration camps surrounded by barbed wire in 17 which they and their families were detained; and 18 WHEREAS, More than 12,000 volunteers responded to unfounded 19 questions of their loyalty and patriotism by amassing a battle record 20 unparalleled in United States military history that, according to 21 General Douglas MacArthur's chief of intelligence, "saved a million 22 lives and shortened the war by two years"; and p. 1 8617 1 WHEREAS, Equally loyal and patriotic Japanese-Americans fought
    [Show full text]
  • The Bastards of Bataan: General Douglas Macarthur's Role
    The Bastards of Bataan: General Douglas MacArthur’s Role in the Fall of the Philippines during World War II By: Lahia Marie Ellingson Senior Seminar: History 499 Professor Bau-Hwa Hsieh Western Oregon University June 8, 2007 Readers Professor Kimberly Jensen Professor John L. Rector Copyright © Lahia Ellingson, 2007 On December 8, 1941, just hours after having attacked the United States’ fleet on Pearl Harbor, the Japanese army turned their attention toward another American stronghold, the forces stationed on the Philippines. Here the Japanese attacked Clark Field, an American airbase on the island of Luzon.1 The subsequent battle and surrender that ensued has become known as “…the worst defeat yet suffered by the United States, a source of national humiliation.”2 With all of the confusion and horror that happened to the men in the Philippines it is hard to understand where blame should be placed. Was it General Douglas MacArthur, the Commanding General in the Philippines at the time? Or were there other factors such as war in Europe and conflicting beliefs on how best to defend the Philippines that led to the defeat? Historians have debated MacArthur’s role in the Philippines for some time. There are those who believe that MacArthur should be held accountable for the fall of the Philippines and those who see him as a commanding general who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. In this paper it will be argued that MacArthur’s actions in the Philippines prior to his escape to Australia hastened the fall of the Philippines, which led to more death and brutality at the hands of the Japanese.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Conscious Emotions
    EMOTIONS The Self-Conscious Emotions Michael Lewis, PhD Institute for the Study of Child Development, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Child Health Institute, USA September 2011 Introduction 1 Until recently, the self-conscious emotions have been poorly studied. Little research on their meaning, how they develop, and how individual differences arises have been conducted, even though Charles Darwin 2 discussed them in some detail as far back as his book, The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Darwin’s observations were not followed up by neither psychoanalysis nor developmental psychopathology until about 40 years ago. In part, this was due to Freud’s focus on guilt and on the confusion between such self- conscious emotions as embarrassment, guilt and shame. In fact, Darwin’s observations and theorizing were not able to differentiate these different self-conscious emotions, in large part due to his measurement of the self- conscious emotions, where he used blushing behaviour. While blushing is a useful behaviour to measure, many people do not blush. Moreover, blushing is a measure of self reflection in the presence of other people, most noticeable embarrassment, but is not a measure of all the other self-conscious emotions such as shame, guilt or pride. While Darwin recognized the role of a person’s thoughts, especially around the emotion of embarrassment, he did not use cognitive capacities as a way to differentiate between them. Subject Michael Lewis, in his studies of the origins of the self-conscious emotions, makes the point that to understand the ontogenesis of these emotions in children, it is necessary to consider the cognitive development of the child 3,4 which likely give rise to them.
    [Show full text]