EMPORIA STATE RESEARCH STUDIES Vol. 43, no. 1, p. 26-37 (2006) The Congo question: Conflicting visions of independence JONATHAN J. COLE -- History Department, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 (
[email protected]) INTRODUCTION Communauté) in 1958, which offered autonomy as an intermediate step toward independence. Nevertheless, it It was November 30, 1960. Only half a year prior, Patrice would be wholly naive to say that Britain or France had Lumumba, the first democratically elected Prime Minister of willfully dismantled their empires simply to appease the Congo, had addressed thronging crowds in honor of the nationalist sentiments in the colonies or to avoid military formal declaration of Congolese independence. But on this entanglement with insurrectionary groups. In fact, both day, he bore no reminder of his status as the preeminent Britain and France had shown their resolve to retain their political figure in the nation. He no longer wore the maroon colonies in the face of such pressure in Kenya against the sash of the order of the Crown, Belgium’s highest decoration, Mau Mau insurrection and in Algeria against the FLN (Front but rather the marks of a man beaten, tortured, and spat upon, de Libération Nationale). Instead, the process of the high fashion of the political prisoner. Yet in the face of decolonization, as cultivated by Europe and the United States, death, Patrice Lumumba’s last letter to his wife Pauline represented the renegotiation of power on the continent, a expressed his undying dream of independence, both for the means of preserving European and American interests and Congo and the entire African continent.