DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effects of Transitional Justice Processes on Serbo- Croatian and Serbo-Bosnian Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effects of Transitional Justice Processes on Serbo- Croatian and Serbo-Bosnian Relations The Effects of Transitional Justice Processes on Serbo- Croatian and Serbo-Bosnian Relations Master thesis for the award of the academic degree of Master of Arts (MA) at the Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz submitted by Nina MIROSAVLJEVIC at the institute: Centre for Southeast European Studies supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Phil. Florian Bieber Graz, 2015 The Effects of Transitional Justice Processes on Serbo-Croatian and Serbo-Bosnian Relations The thesis deals with the question of how transitional justice processes related to the 1990s Yugoslav wars affect relations between Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as between Serbia and Croatia. The three chosen countries each have their own version of events that took place during the wartime, which makes reconciliation in the region difficult. Therefore, transitional justice tools—criminal prosecutions, truth commissions, symbolic and material reparations, and institutional reforms—should help societies establish the truth about past atrocities, provide justice to the victims, and thus lead to reconciliation. However, the analysis of the transitional justice processes in Serbia, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina has shown that transitional justice mechanisms were not properly implemented. Contrariwise, countries have misused them for the promotion of the official interpretations of recent past. Consequently these transitional justice processes have caused tensions in Serbian bilateral relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and with Croatia. Hence, the transitional justice mechanisms failed to change the discourse since they were not aimed at genuine reckoning with the past. Key words: transitional justice, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina Auswirkungen der Prozesse von Übergangsjustiz auf serbisch-kroatische und serbisch- bosnische Beziehungen Die Masterarbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, wie die Prozesse der Übergangsjustiz bezüglich jugoslawischer Kriege in den 1990ern die Beziehungen zwischen Serbien und Bosnien und Herzegowina sowie zwischen Serbien und Kroatien beeinflussen. Die drei ausgewählten Länder haben jeweils ihre eigene Darstellung, was während der Kriegszeit geschah. Dies aber erschwert die Versöhnung in der Region. Die Instrumente der Übergangsjustiz – Strafverfolgung, Wahrheitskomissionen, symbolische und materielle Reparationen und institutionelle Reformen – sollen Gesellschaften helfen, die Wahrheit über vergangene Gräueltaten zu etablieren, den Opfern die Gerechtigkeit bereitzustellen und damit zur Versöhnung zu führen. Jedoch zeigte die Prozessanalyse der Übergangsjustiz in Serbien, Kroatien und Bosnien und Herzegowina, dass die Übergangsjustizmechanismen nicht korrekt durchgeführt wurden. Im Gegenteil, die Länder missbrauchten sie zur Promotion ihrer offiziellen Interpretationen der jüngeren Vergangenheit. Demzufolge riefen diese Prozesse der Übergangsjustiz eine Spannung in den bilateralen Beziehungen Serbiens mit Bosnien und Herzegowina und Kroatien hervor. Die Übergangsjustizmechanismen konnten daher den Diskurs nicht ändern, weil sie nicht auf die echte Vergangenheitsarbeit zielen. Schlüsselwörter: Übergangsjustiz, Serbien, Kroatien, Bosnien und Herzegowina TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Methodology and structure .......................................................................................................... 10 2 TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE: DEFINITION AND ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT .............. 11 2.1 Approaches to transitional justice ............................................................................................... 13 3 TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN SELECTED POST-YUGOSLAV STATES ............................ 17 3.1 Serbia ........................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Criminal prosecution ............................................................................................................ 19 3.1.2 Truth-telling initiatives ......................................................................................................... 22 3.1.3 Reparations ........................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.4 Institutional reform ............................................................................................................... 26 3.2 Croatia ......................................................................................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Criminal prosecution ............................................................................................................ 26 3.2.2 Truth-telling initiatives ......................................................................................................... 29 3.2.3 Reparations ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.4 Institutional reform ............................................................................................................... 32 3.3 Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................................................................. 33 3.3.1 Criminal prosecution ............................................................................................................ 34 3.3.2 Truth-telling initiatives ......................................................................................................... 36 3.3.3 Reparations ........................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.4 Institutional reform ............................................................................................................... 39 3.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 40 4 ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE PROCESSES ON SERBO- CROATIAN AND SERBO-BOSNIAN RELATIONS ..................................................................... 43 4.1 Serbo-Bosnian relations in the light of transitional justice .......................................................... 43 4.1.1 The effects of transitional justice processes related to the Srebrenica genocide .................. 43 4.1.2 Transitional justice processes related to war crimes processing .......................................... 47 4.2 Serbo-Croatian relations in the light of transitional justice ......................................................... 49 4.2.1 The effects of transitional justice processes related to the mutual genocide lawsuits .......... 50 4.2.2 Transitional justice processes related to war crimes processing .......................................... 51 4.2.3 Transitional justice processes related to symbolic reparations ............................................. 53 4.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 55 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 57 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 60 1 INTRODUCTION The third democratization wave and the emergence of the new world order in the wake of the Cold War prompted a new discourse of human rights, humanitarianism, and international law. It was in this context that the field of transitional justice emerged – an approach that seeks to answer the question of how to cope with the legacies of previous repressive rule or violent conflict (Teitel 2000, 3; Hilton 2010, 2). According to International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), it “refers to the set of judicial and non-judicial measures that have been implemented by different countries in order to redress the legacies of massive human rights abuses. /It is/ an approach to achieve justice in times of transition from conflict and/or state repression” (ICTJ 2014). The establishment of truth commissions in several African and Latin American countries after many years of military dictatorships, the international tribunals for war crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda as well as lustration and reparation practices in the former communist states are just few examples of how states in transition deal with their recent violent past (Ostojić 2007, 104). Although criminal prosecutions and truth commissions appear to be the most favoured means (Hilton 2010, 1), transitional justice includes also different material and symbolic reparation initiatives, memorialization efforts, various kinds of institutional reform and other approaches of redressing past wrongs (ICTJ 2014). The aim of these various models of transitional justice is to provide justice to the victims, to punish the perpetrators, to strengthen the rule of law, to come to terms with the past, to prevent the recurrence of such violence, and ultimately reconciliation (Ostojić 2007, 105; Subotić 2009, 3–4). Although relatively new, transitional justice is a burgeoning field of research. The post- Yugoslav space has received considerable attention in transitional justice literature and is indeed an interesting case to examine since each country has its own view on the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 08-09-15 Prosecutor V. Delic Judgement FINAL Without Maps.…
    UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-04-83-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 15 September 2008 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Bakone Justice Moloto, Presiding Judge Frederik Harhoff Judge Flavia Lattanzi Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 15 September 2008 PROSECUTOR v. RASIM DELI] PUBLIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Daryl Mundis Ms. Laurie Sartorio Mr. Matthias Neuner Mr. Kyle Wood Mr. Aditya Menon Counsel for the Accused: Ms. Vasvija Vidovi} Mr. Nicholas Robson Case No. IT-04-83-T 15September 2008 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. THE ACCUSED RASIM DELIĆ ........................................................................................................1 B. THE CASE AGAINST RASIM DELIĆ ................................................................................................2 1. Alleged Crimes at Maline/Bikoši (June 1993).........................................................................2 2. Alleged Crimes at Livade and Kamenica Camp (July - August 1995) ...................................3 3. Alleged Crimes at Kesten and Kamenica Camp (September 1995)........................................4 C. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE ..................................6 II. APPLICABLE LAW ..................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security
    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa’Ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad by John R
    Unholy Terror: Bosnia, al-Qa’ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad by John R. Schindler, Zenith Press, 2008, 368 pp. Marko Attila Hoare Also under review: Christopher Deliso, The Coming Balkan Caliphate: The Threat of Radical Islam to Europe and the West, Praeger Security International, 2007; Shaul Shay, Islamic Terror and the Balkans, Transaction Publishers, 2007. The role of al-Qaeda and the foreign mujahedin in the wars in the former Yugoslavia of the 1990s remains controversial, but the controversy is not over whether the phenomenon was a positive one or not. Reading some of the coverage of the subject, one might be forgiven for thinking that the wars fought in Bosnia and Kosova were merely individual fronts in something much bigger: the global struggle between the warriors and opponents of radical Islam. Yet as is so often the case, it is the smaller, local struggle that is more bitter and protracted than the global one, and that inspires the greater loyalty and commitment. The recently published books by John R. Schindler and Christopher Deliso, Unholy Terror: Bosnia, al-Qa’ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad and The Coming Balkan Caliphate: The Threat of Radical Islam to Europe and the West respectively, are really books about the Balkans more than about radical Islam; and it is the rights and wrongs of the Balkan conflicts, more than the threat posed by radical Islam, that motivate the authors. Schindler and Deliso share a hostility to Islam and to the politics of Western liberal interventionism which goes far beyond any mere concern with the alleged Islamist threat in the Balkans.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Specified
    S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 221 Casualties: Not specified Narrative of Events: 416. Despite Monday's dispatch of UN troops from Croatia to take control of the Sarajevo airport, Sarajevo itself remained volatile as sporadic fighting continued throughout the city. Serbian forces were reported to have withdrawn from the Sarajevo airfield, and they were also reported to have taken their large artillery weapons with them. Muslim forces had likewise been persuaded to reduce their fire in the airport area. 446/ 417. One hundred twenty-five French marines arrived at the airport and 1,000 members of the Canadian Mechanized Infantry and 80 armoured vehicles were scheduled to arrive on 2 July. These Canadian infantry forces were scheduled to be replaced within three weeks by combined UN peace-keeping forces from France, the Ukraine and Egypt. 447/ (b) Local reported events 418. The first UN relief supplies reached Sarajevo airport and local relief workers distributed 15 tons of food to 1,500 Muslim refugees and food and medical supplies also reached Koševo Hospital. 448/ (c) International reported events 419. US Defense Secretary, Richard B. Cheney, stated that the Bush administration was prepared to commit air and naval combat forces to escort and protect relief convoys into Sarajevo. 449/ 2. 2/7/92 (Thursday) (a) Military Activity Combat and Shelling Activity: BiH and Serbian forces continued to exchange artillery fire around the airport. Source(s): Agence France Presse. Targets Hit: Not specified Description of Damage: Not specified Sniping Activity: Not specified Casualties: Not specified Narrative of Events: 420. Following a series of delays that kept a Canadian mechanized infantry battalion stranded for three days on its 250 mile journey from Croatia, the Canadian battalion, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Michel Jones, fought its way through a Serb roadblock 74 miles north-west of Sarajevo and deployed 40 of its 80 armoured vehicles around the perimeter of the Sarajevo airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Haris Kušmić interviewed Jovan Divjak Interview date: 7 August 2019 Kušmić: Allow me to formally introduce myself. I am Haris Kušmić, currently working with the WFD [Westminster Foundation for Democracy]. I am interviewing Mr Jovan Divjak, whose biography I cannot possibly fit into a few opening sentences. Let me instead say something I have said before in conversation with him: that he is someone who has built and defended and given everything he had to this country in periods of both war and peace. Mr Divjak, thank you very much for inviting me here and giving me an opportunity to interview you. Unlike other interviews, the questions here may relate more to your personality. We are certainly going to touch on things that you have gone through, that the general public is familiar with, but the goal of this interview is to try and see Jovan Divjak as Jovan Divjak: you as a person, things you have gone through in your life, from childhood on—which may well be appropriate, as you are working on your book. We hope you will succeed in publishing it. Divjak: And its title is “Do Not Shoot.” Kušmić: And its title is “Do Not Shoot.” Exactly. Well, we can begin with your early life, when you were a child. Could you perhaps tell me something about your childhood? Divjak: Well, my childhood is somewhat fresh in my memory as I often write and speak about it in interviews. I begin with the story of me bringing my parents joy on 11 March 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 758 3099. After Meeting with Bosnian Serb
    S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 758 3099. After meeting with Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadži( in Pale, special envoy Akashi stated: "I have been assured by Dr. Karadži( that so far as his side is concerned there will be full respect for the use for our purposes of Sarajevo airport". 4186/ 3100. Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadži( warned that any NATO air strikes against his people would force them to reconsider all concessions to BiH. "If NATO adopts a new resolution aimed against the Serbs it would most certainly not contribute to the peace process, but instead would cause new difficulties in the search for a peace agreement", Karadži( told the Bosnian Serb news agency SRNA. 4187/ (c) International reported events 3101. NATO leaders said that they were ready to order air strikes in BiH under UN authority to prevent the siege of Sarajevo or to protect other areas, according to a draft of an alliance summit statement. A copy of the statement, which NATO sources said had been agreed to by all 16 leaders and was to be issued Tuesday stated: "We affirm our readiness, under the authority of the United Nations Security Council ... to carry out air strikes in order to prevent the strangulation of Sarajevo, the safe areas and other threatened areas in BiH". 4188/ 3102. In Bonn, BiH President Izetbegovi( and Croatian President Tudjman met face-to-face in the morning for nearly three hours before being joined by mediators Lord Owen and Thorvald Stoltenberg. After a break for lunch and consultations, the four resumed talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation, Mr. Jovan Divjak, ICIP Peace in Progress Award 2013 March 17, 2014
    Speech by the Executive Director of the “Education Builds Bosnia and Herzegovina” Foundation, Mr. Jovan Divjak, ICIP Peace in Progress Award 2013 March 17, 2014 Distinguished ladies; distinguished gentlemen, Esteemed guests, Excellencies, Dear friends, I feel honored and proud that the Board of the International Catalan Institute for Peace has bestowed upon me the ICIP Peace in Progress Award 2013. I consider it a tribute to all the people of Sarajevo and of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to young and old, who put all their intellectual and physical efforts into preserving the right to life, freedom and peace during the savage aggression that took place during the years 1992-1995. We are witnesses to the fact that, every day, everywhere on Earth, there are conflicts between people, and we are also witnesses to wars and peace. Those who develop, plan and lead these wars are the main defenders, lobbyists for peace. What hypocrisy! When, right now, thousands of women, children and elderly people are dying at their doorsteps, victims of weapons that have been prohibited by the conventions of world organizations. 1 Major countries, corporations and arms producers don’t like the idea of eternal peace because, if those who defend peace and respect the right to life won and could change the world, armies wouldn’t be needed; they would be useless and their financial backers would lose all their power. We live in a world full of absurdities in which the masters of our lives invoke democracy and the UN Declaration of Human Rights while, at the same time, hundreds of thousands of people on this Earth are dying of hunger, disease and poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of Stabilisation: Bosnia and Herzegovina from the Perspective of Central Europe
    PARADOXES OF STABILISATION BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CENTRAL EUROPE Edited by Marta Szpala W ARSAW FEBRUARY 2016 PARADOXES OF STABILISATION BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CENTRAL EUROPE E dited by Marta Szpala © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Marta Szpala EDITOR Nicholas Furnival CO-OPERATION Anna Łabuszewska, Katarzyna Kazimierska GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER F. Pallars / Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-78-6 Contents INTRODUCTION /7 PART I. THE INTERNAL CHALLENGES Jan Muś ONE HAND CLAPPING – THE STATE-BUILDING PROCESS AND THE CONSTITUTION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA /17 1. Origins of the Constitution /17 2. Non-territorial division – Constituent Peoples /19 3. Territorial division /19 4. Constitutional consociationalism – institutions, processes, competences and territorial division /21 4.1. Representation of ethnic groups or ethnicisation of institutions /22 4.2. The division of competences /24 4.3. Procedural guarantees of inclusion /26 Conclusions /27 Wojciech Stanisławski THREE NATIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (TO SAY NOTHING OF THE FOURTH). THE QUEST FOR A POST-DAYTON COLLECTIVE BOSNIAN IDENTITY /29 1. The three historical and political nations of Bosnia /31 2. The nations or the projects? /32 3. The stalemate and the protests /34 4. The quest for a shared memory /35 Hana Semanić FRAGMENTATION AND SEGREGATION IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA /39 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical and Urban Changes in Sarajevo (1995 – 2015)
    Geopolitical and urban changes in Sarajevo (1995 – 2015) Jordi Martín i Díaz Aquesta tesi doctoral està subjecta a la llicència Reconeixement- NoComercial – SenseObraDerivada 3.0. Espanya de Creative Commons. Esta tesis doctoral está sujeta a la licencia Reconocimiento - NoComercial – SinObraDerivada 3.0. España de Creative Commons. This doctoral thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0. Spain License. Facultat de Geografia i Història Departament de Geografia Programa de Doctorat “Geografia, planificació territorial i gestió ambiental” Tesi doctoral Geopolitical and urban changes in Sarajevo (1995 – 2015) del candidat a optar al Títol de Doctor en Geografia, Planificació Territorial i Gestió Ambiental Jordi Martín i Díaz Directors Dr. Carles Carreras i Verdaguer Dr. Nihad Čengi ć Tutor Dr. Carles Carreras i Verdaguer Barcelona, 2017 This dissertation has been funded by the Program Formación del Profesorado Universitario of the Spanish Ministry of Education, fellowship reference (AP2010- 3873). Als meus pares i al meu germà. Table of contents Aknowledgments Abstract About this project 1. Theoretical and conceptual approach 15 Socialist and post-socialist cities 19 The question of ethno-territorialities 26 Regarding international intervention in post-war contexts 30 Methodological approach 37 Information gathering and techniques 40 Structure of the dissertation 44 2. The destruction and division of Sarajevo 45 Sarajevo: common life and urban expansion until early 1990s 45 The urban expansion 48 The emergence of political pluralism 55 Towards the ethnic division of Sarajevo: SDS’s ethno-territorialisation campaign and the international partiality in the crisis 63 The Western policy towards Yugoslavia: paving the way for the violent ethnic division of Bosnia 73 The siege of Sarajevo 77 Deprivation, physical destruction and displacement 82 The international response to the siege 85 SDA performance 88 Sarajevo’s ethno-territorial division in the Dayton Peace Agreement 92 The DPA and the OHR’s mission 95 3.
    [Show full text]
  • S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 152 II. CHRONOLOGY of the BATTLE
    S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 152 II. CHRONOLOGY OF THE BATTLE AND SIEGE OF SARAJEVO A. April 1992 1. 5/4/92 (Sunday) (a) Military activity Combat and Shelling Activity: After thousands of protestors took to the streets, fierce shooting from heavy machineguns and automatic weapons were heard in all parts of the city, accompanied by explosions. Source(s): Reuters; United Press International. Targets Hit: Unidentified downtown buildings. Source(s): Reuters Press Report. Description of Damage: Bullet shattered windows in a number of unidentified downtown buildings. Source(s): Reuters Press Report. Sniping Activity: Shooting into crowds of demonstrators by unidentified gunmen. Source(s): United Press International. Casualties: A doctor at the Sarajevo hospital and police officials said at least seven people were killed Sunday (three in pre-dawn police station attacks) and 10 were injured. 60/ Source(s): United Press International. Narrative of Events: 54. Tensions escalated on the eve of a meeting by European Community Ministers who were expected to announce the recognition of BiH as an independent state. Fighting broke out after the expiration of a 2:00 p.m. deadline set by Serbian leaders for cancellation of a full mobilization of the Republic’s Territorial Defence and police reserve forces dominated by Croats and Muslims. The mobilization order was issued Saturday by President Alija Izetbegovi@. 61/ 55. After the deadline passed, thousands of people were reported to have taken to the streets in spontaneous peace marches as government-run Sarajevo television began issuing appeals for ethnic amity. The largest body of demonstrators headed towards the Republic's Assembly building, and hundreds began moving toward several buildings that had been seized by armed Serbs.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hague Tribunal’S Impact in a Postwar State
    Southeastern Europe 36 (2012) 128–134 brill.nl/seeu A Response to Viktor Peskin and Michael Struett’s Comments on Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar State Lara J. Nettelfield University of Exeter In July 2011, Serbian police arrested Goran Hadžić, the last of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia’s (ICTY) indicted war criminals. Hadžić, who had eluded Serbian police before, was leader of Croatia’s self- proclaimed breakaway region, the Republic of Serb Krajina. Local prosecutors said he was caught while trying to sell a stolen painting by Amedeo Modigliani, a possible trophy from the wars of 1990s (Jolly 21 July 21 2011). Unlike Bosnian Serb General Ratko Mladić, who was transferred to The Hague in May to great media fanfare, Hadžić was unknown outside of Southeastern Europe. Mladić’s appearance in court, on the other hand, retrained the world’s focus on the ICTY and begged the question, “why now?” The answer lay with the obvious carrot of EU membership. Both events coincided with Serbia’s desire to fix a date for the start of EU accession talks. The cold calculation that the execution of the requirements of international justice would bring politi- cal and monetary gains figured more prominently than what Serbia’s ambas- sador to the UK called its “legal and moral obligation to the Hague process” (Tisdall 20 July 2011). Beyond the Tribunal proceedings, in recent years, Serbia has been using law to promote its own version of the wars of the 1990s, reaching into Bosnia- Herzegovina to accuse its military leaders of crimes.
    [Show full text]