DOCSLIB.ORG

Capacity Self-Assessment Within the Thematic Area of Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capacity Self-Assessment Within the Thematic Area of Biodiversity SELF-ASSESSMENT OF COUNTRY CAPACITY NEEDS FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT CAPACITY SELF-ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE THEMATIC AREA OF BIODIVERSITY Prepared by Svetozar Petkovski, Ph.D., Museum Advisor – Macedonian Museum of Natural History, Skopje Vlado Matevski, Ph.D., Professor – Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Skopje Ljupco Melovski, Ph.D., Professor – Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Skopje Sreten Andonov, Ph.D., Professor – Faculty of Agriculture, Skopje Zoran Spirkovski, M.Sc., Scientific Collaborator – Institute of Hydrobiology, Ohrid SKOPJE, JANUARY, 2004 CAPACITY SELF ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE THEMATIC AREA 2 OF BIODIVERSITY IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA TABLE OF CONTENT Executive Summary 4 Section I. Introduction 10 A. General Aspects....................................................................................................... 10 B. Methodological Approach....................................................................................... 11 Section II. Country Framework 12 A. Natural Geographic Framework.............................................................................. 12 A.1. Location, borders, and land area ............................................................................ 12 A.2. Physical geography and climate............................................................................. 12 A.2.1. Topography and relief ..................................................................................... 12 A.2.2. Surface hydrology ........................................................................................... 13 A.2.3. Climate ............................................................................................................ 14 A.2.4. Soils................................................................................................................. 14 B. Socio-economic Framework ................................................................................... 15 B.1. Population............................................................................................................... 15 B.2. Human settlements ................................................................................................. 15 B.3. Social and economic situation................................................................................ 16 B.4. Land use ................................................................................................................. 16 C. Economic Framework ............................................................................................. 17 C.1. Agriculture.............................................................................................................. 17 C.2. Forestry...................................................................................................................18 C.3. Fisheries..................................................................................................................18 C.4. Industry...................................................................................................................19 C.5. Construction ........................................................................................................... 20 C.6. Mining .................................................................................................................... 20 C.7. Energy .................................................................................................................... 20 C.8. Transport ................................................................................................................ 21 Section III. Status of Biodiversity 22 A. Flora ........................................................................................................................ 22 A.1. Species diversity..................................................................................................... 22 A.2. Endemic species ..................................................................................................... 22 A.3. Habitats and Vegetation ......................................................................................... 22 A.4. Threatened species ................................................................................................. 24 A.5. Threatened habitats ................................................................................................ 24 B. Fauna....................................................................................................................... 26 B.1. Species diversity..................................................................................................... 26 B.2. Endemic species ..................................................................................................... 26 B.3. Threatened species.................................................................................................. 26 C. Agrobiodiversity...................................................................................................... 27 D. Threats to Biodiversity............................................................................................ 27 D.1. Underlying causes of biodiversity loss................................................................... 27 D.2. Analysis of economic sectors................................................................................. 28 D.3. Basic causes for biodiversity loss........................................................................... 28 D.4. Direct causes of biodiversity loss........................................................................... 29 D.5. Other factors........................................................................................................... 30 Section IV. Status of Biodiversity Conservation 31 A. Protected Areas ....................................................................................................... 31 A.1. National Park Management.................................................................................... 31 A.2. Management of Natural Lakes ............................................................................... 32 A.2.1. Lake Ohrid ...................................................................................................... 32 A.2.2. Lake Prespa ..................................................................................................... 34 UNDP, Skopje, 2004 CAPACITY SELF ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE THEMATIC AREA 3 OF BIODIVERSITY IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA A.2.3. Lake Dojran..................................................................................................... 35 A.2.4. Measures for protection of the three natural lakes in Macedonia ................... 35 A.3 Management of other protected areas ..................................................................... 36 B. Management Outside Protected Areas .......................................................................... 36 B.1 General Measures .................................................................................................... 36 B.2 Agriculture Management......................................................................................... 36 B.3 Forest Management ................................................................................................. 38 B.4 Fisheries Management............................................................................................. 39 B.5 Hunting Management .............................................................................................. 41 B.5.1. Hunting Grounds and Concessions ................................................................. 41 B.6 In-Situ Conservation................................................................................................ 42 B.7 Ex-Situ Conservation .............................................................................................. 42 Section V. Strategy and Policy Framework 44 A. Policy Framework ................................................................................................... 44 B. Legislation Framework ........................................................................................... 44 B.1. Laws .......................................................................................................................44 B.2. International Conventions and Agreements ........................................................... 47 C. Institutional Framework .......................................................................................... 48 C.1. Government of Macedonia..................................................................................... 49 C.2. Other Institutions.................................................................................................... 50 Section VI. National Priority Issues 52 A. Assessing National Priority Issues .......................................................................... 54 Section VII. Capacity Constraints for National Priority Issues 56 A. Assessing Capacity Constraints at the Systemic Level ........................................... 56 B. Assessing Capacity Constraints At The Institutional Level.................................... 61 C. Assessing Capacity Constraints At The Individual Level....................................... 66 D. Overall Constraints Assessment.............................................................................. 72 E. Capacity Constraints Matrix...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania
    TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid region - Albania IUCN – ICOMOS joint draft report January 2016 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... i A. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. The study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 B.1 The physical environment ............................................................................................................. 5 B.2 The biotic environment ................................................................................................................. 7 B.3 Cultural Settings ............................................................................................................................ 0 C. Heritage values and resources/ attributes ................................................................................................ 6 C.1 Natural heritage values and resources ......................................................................................... 6 C.2 Cultural heritage values and resources....................................................................................... 12 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability in Biodiversity Sector
    Ministry of Envrionment and Physical Planning of the Republic of Macedonia United Nations Development Programme Project 00075206 “Third National Report to UNFCCC” Project report Climate change vulnerability in Biodiversity sector Melovski Ljupčo, Matevski Vlado, Hristovski Slavčo Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Skopje, 2013 2 Contents 1 National Circumstances related to climate change vulnerability in Biodiversity Sector ................ 5 1.1 Introduction – climate change and Biodiversity Sector ................................................................ 5 1.1.1 Climate change vulnerability in Biodiversity Sector........................................................ 5 1.1.2 Climate change adaptation in Biodiversity Sector .......................................................... 7 1.2 Overview of Biodiversity Sector .................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Major stakeholders ....................................................................................................... 15 1.2.3 Sector documents ......................................................................................................... 17 1.2.4 Data availability ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VENDIM Nr. 407, Datë 8.5.2013 PËR PËRCAKTIMIN E NJË REGJIMI
    VENDIM Nr. 407, datë 8.5.2013 PËR PËRCAKTIMIN E NJË REGJIMI KONTROLLI PËR TË GARANTUAR RESPEKTIMIN E RREGULLAVE TË POLITIKAVE MENAXHUESE NË PESHKIM Në mbështetje të nenit 100 të Kushtetutës të neneve 72, pika 8, 74, pika 4, 77, pika 3, 82, pika 2, 101, pika 2, 112, pika 3, 113, pika 1, 116, 118, pika 3, dhe 135, pika 1 të ligjit nr. 64/2012, datë 31.5.2012 “Për peshkimin”, me propozimin e Ministrit të Mjedisit, Pyjeve dhe Administrimit të Ujërave, Këshilli i Ministrave VENDOSI: KREU I TË PËRGJITHSHME 1. Ngritjen e një sistemi kontrolli, inspektimi dhe zbatimi, në kuptim të këtij vendimi “regjimi i kontrollit”, për të garantuar respektimin e rregullave të politikave menaxhuese në peshkim. 2. Regjim kontrolli, në kuptimin e këtij vendimi, është tërësia e masave dhe aktiviteteve që do të ndërmerren për një shfrytëzim dhe zhvillim të qëndrueshëm të burimeve peshkore të ujërave detare dhe ujërave të brendshme nëpërmjet sistemit të monitorimit dhe mbikëqyrjes, inspektimit dhe kontrollit të kryer nga nëpunësit përkatës, për të verifikuar zbatimin e rregullave të peshkimit, pasqyrimin e këtij kontrolli në raportet përkatëse, regjistrimin e të dhënave në librat e anijes apo në format elektronik, identifikimin e lëvizjes së anijeve dhe komunikimin elektronik të tyre, sigurimin dhe transmetimin e të dhënave, rregullimin e kapacitetit të peshkimit, procedurat për shitjen e parë të produkteve të peshkimit, skemën e certifikimit të zënieve për eksportimin dhe importimin e produkteve peshkore dhe autoritetet përgjegjëse për kontrollin e tyre. Ky përfshin të gjitha aktivitetet që kryhen në territorin e Republikës së Shqipërisë nga anijet shqiptare të peshkimit ose nga shtetasit shqiptarë.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Influence and Conservation Status of Autochthonous Fish Fauna from Lake Ohrid
    Anthropogenic Influence and Conservation Status of Autochthonous Fish Fauna from Lake Ohrid Trajce Talevski, Hydrobiological Institute, Naum Ohridski, 50, 6000 Ohrid, R.Macedonia, email: [email protected] Dragana Milosevic, Department of biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Montenegro, Podgorica. Montenegro email: [email protected] Aleksandra Talevska, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Institute for biology, University St. Kiril and Metodij, Skopje, R.Macedonia email: [email protected] Abstract Lake Ohrid is transboundary lake between R.Macedonia and R.Albania. It is the deepest lake of the Balkan, with a maximum depth of 297 and a mean depth of 155 m. Lake Ohrid is special as such, by far the most spectacular quality is its impressive endemism from cyprinid and salmonid fish. This paper is result of long-term researches of ichthyofauna from Lake Ohrid. The materials for researches were collected by day and nighttime’s experimental fishing with various fishing gill net. Conservation status of autochthonous fish fauna from Lake Ohrid was determinate according to IUCN (2001) and Kotellat and Freyhof (2007). Key words: anthropogenic influence, autochthonous fish fauna, conservation status, Lake Ohrid Intoduction IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (also known as the IUCN Red List or Red Data List), founded in 1948, is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of plant and animal species. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) is the world's main authority on the conservation status of species. The IUCN Red List is set upon precise criteria to evaluate the extinction risk of thousands of species and subspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • 10-II 10 Talevski 1.Indd
    61 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21 (Supplement 1) 2015, 61–67 Agricultural Academy CONSERVATION STATUS OF NATIVE SPECIES IN NATURAL LAKES OF DRIM SYSTEM (PRESPA, OHRID AND SKADAR LAKE) AND DANGERS OF COMMERCIAL FISHING D. MILOŠEVIĆ*1 and T. TALEVSKI2 1 University of Montenegro, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Podgorica, Montenegro 2 Department of Cyprinid Fauna, Hydrobiological Institute, Ohrid, University “Kliment Ohridski”, Bitola, R. Macedonia Abstract MILOŠEVIĆ, D. and T. TALEVSKI, 2015. Conservation status of native species in natural lakes of Drim system (Prespa, Ohrid and Skadar lake) and dangers of commercial fi shing. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., Supplement 1, 21: 61–67 Prespa, Ohrid and Skadar are the largest lakes on the Balkan Peninsula. The native fi sh population consists, in total, of fi fty species. These lakes represent centers of biodiversity of ichthyofauna of the Balkans and many fi sh species are strictly protected and placed on the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) red list. In fact, one species is listed as Extinct (EX), three are Critically Endangered (CR), three are Endangered (EN), eight are Vulnerable (VU), twenty-four are Least Concern (LC), fi ve are listed as Data Defi cient (DD) and six species are Not Evaluated (NE). At the same time Prespa, Ohrid and Skadarlakes are signifi cant fi shing areas where commercial fi shing is conducted. In some lakes, large quantities of fi sh that are caught are strictly protected species according to the IUCN red list. Key
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Life-History in Native Trout (Salmo Spp.) Suppresses the Invasive Effect of Alien Trout Strains Introduced Into Streams in the Western Part of the Balkans
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 14 July 2020 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00188 Alternative Life-History in Native Trout (Salmo spp.) Suppresses the Invasive Effect of Alien Trout Strains Introduced Into Streams in the Western Part of the Balkans Dubravka Škraba Jurlina 1, Ana Maric´ 1, Danilo Mrdak 2, Tamara Kanjuh 1, Ivan Špelic´ 3, Vera Nikolic´ 1, Marina Piria 3 and Predrag Simonovic´ 1,4* 1 Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, 2 Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro, 3 Department of Fisheries, Apiculture, Wildlife Management and Special Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 4 Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stankovic,”´ University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia The diversity of native trout fish Salmo spp. comprises a variety of nominal taxa in Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recent mapping of the resident trout Edited by: populations detected the presence of brown trout Salmo trutta (sensu stricto) of the Eleni Kalogianni, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Atlantic (AT) mtDNA lineage introduced into populations of both tentative Danubian trout (HCMR), Greece Salmo labrax and of tentative Adriatic trout Salmo farioides belonging to the Danubian Reviewed by: (DA) and Adriatic (AD) mtDNA lineages, respectively. Introduction of the tentative L. Asbjørn Vøllestad, Macedonian trout Salmo macedonicus of the AD lineage was also detected in a native University of Oslo, Norway Douglas Joseph Dieterman, population of the tentative S. labrax. In almost all recipient nonmigratory trout populations, Minnesota Department of Natural a cross-breeding between native and introduced trout was detected by heterozygosity Resources, United States in either only the LDH-C nuclear locus or the LDH-C and specific microsatellite loci.
    [Show full text]
  • FJALOR I Emrave Të Kafshëve Të Shqipërisë
    1 Prof. Dr. Dhimitër Dhora Universiteti i Shkodrës “Luigj Gurakuqi” Fakulteti i Shkencave të Natyrës Departamenti i Biologji-Kimisë FJALOR i emrave të kafshëve të Shqipërisë latinisht-shqip-anglisht Botimet “Camaj-Pipa” 2 Prof. Dr. Dhimitër Dhora Fjalor i emrave të kafshëve të Shqipërisë latinisht-shqip-anglisht _________________________________________________ Grafika: Gjergj Spathari ISBN 978-99956-02-61-1 ©Copyright: Dh. Dhora 3 Përmbajtja Parathënie .................................................. 5 Latinisht-shqip-anglisht ............................. 7 Shqip-latinisht ............................................ 142 Anglisht-latinisht ....................................... 211 Latinisht, në renditje sistematike ............... 248 Literaturë .................................................... 284 4 Parathënie Në shekullin e fundit është bërë një punë e madhe për grum- bullimin dhe pasqyrimin në fjalorë të emrave shqip të kafshëve dhe këtu mund të veçoj fjalorët e Gazullit (1942) dhe Demës (2005), Fjalorin e Shqipes së Sotme (2002) e tj. Nga ana tjetër në shumë fauna të ndryshme të Shqipërisë janë dhënë edhe emrat shqip të llojeve të kafshëve, si tek Bino e tjerë (2006) për shpendët dhe gjitarët, Poljakov e tjerë (1958) dhe Rakaj (1995) për peshqit e tjerë. Mirëpo në të gjitha rastet vërehet mungesa e një bashkëpunimi të frytshëm të gjuhëtarëve me specialistët faunistë, çka duket tek mungesa e specifikimit dhe shpjegimit të saktë të emrave, ose tek varfëria e emrave, për shkak të mos- njohjes së fondit të tyre. Nevojat për të zgjidhur në tërësi këto probleme dhe për ti dhënë lexuesve një fjalor sa më të plotë, kanë qenë motivet kryesore të punës për hatimin e tij dhe për të qënë më i vlefshëm, u hartua në tre gjuhë, latinisht – shqip – anglisht. Ky fjalor përmban emrat e 1140 llojeve të kafshëve të Shqipërisë.
    [Show full text]
  • GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866
    FAMILY Salmonidae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids SUBFAMILY Salmoninae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids [=Dermopteres, Salmonidi, Salmones, Tutriformes (Truttiformes), Salvelini, Brachymystini, Oncorhynchus, Huchoninae, Salmothymini, Salvelinini, Parahuchoninae] GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866 - lenoks, Asiatic trout, Manchurian trout Species Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) - sharp-snouted lenok [=coregonoides, swetowidowi] Species Brachymystax savinovi Mitrofanov, 1959 - Russian lenok Species Brachymystax tsinlingensis Li, 1966 - Yangtze lenok Species Brachymystax tumensis Mori, 1930 - blunt-snouted lenok [=czerskii] GENUS Hucho Gunther, 1866 - salmonids [=Epitomynis] Species Hucho bleekeri Kimura, 1934 - Bleeker's hucho Species Hucho hucho (Linnaeus, 1758) - huchen, huchen trout, Danube salmon [=germanorum] Species Hucho ishikawae Mori, 1928 - Korean hucho Species Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) - taimen [=fluviatilis, lossos] GENUS Oncorhynchus Suckley, 1861 - salmonids [=Hypsifario, Paraoncorhynchus, Parasalmo] Species Oncorhynchus aguabonita (Jordan, 1892) - golden trout, California golden trout [=roosevelti, whitei] Species Oncorhynchus apache (Miller, 1972) - apache trout, Arizona trout Species Oncorhynchus chrysogaster (Needham & Gard, 1964) - Mexican golden trout Species Oncorhynchus clarkii (Richardson, 1837) - cutthroat trout [=alpestris, alvordensis, bathoecetor, behnkei, bouvieri, brevicauda, carinatus, carmichaeli, crescentis, declivifrons, eremogenes, evermanni, henshawi, humboldtensis, jordani, lewisi, macdonaldi,
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda Diversity in the Belt of Chara from Lake Ohrid
    Abstracts of the International Symposium Speciation in Ancient Lakes, SIAL 5 Ohrid, September 7-11, 2009 Scientific Committee (organizers are marked in bold): Andrew S. Cohen (U.S.A.) George Coulter (New Zealand) Matthias Glaubrecht (Germany) Doug Haffner (Canada) Hiroya Kawanabe (Japan) Goce Kostoski (Macedonia) Zdravko Krstanovski (Macedonia) Koen Martens (Belgium) Frank Riedel (Germany) Isa Schön (Belgium) Christian Sturmbauer (Austria) Oleg Timoshkin (Russia) Sasho Trajanovski (Macedonia) Risto Väinolä (Finland) Thomas Wilke (Germany) Edited by Christian Albrecht, Goce Kostoski, Sasho Trajanovski & Thomas Wilke Giessen & Ohrid 2009 ABSTRACTS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER Authors are responsible for the content of their papers All rights reserved by the authors This Abstract book is published with financial support of the Ministry of Education and Sciences of the Republic of Macedonia for which we express our sincere gratitude PREFACE A long-lived lake can be extant (ancient lake) or fossil (paleolake). Ancient lakes typically have continuously existed since before the last glacial period (i.e., ~120,000 years ago) or even since before the Pleistocene some 1.8 million years ago. Lakes such as Baikal, Tanganyika, Malawi, Biwa, and Ohrid, have long been recognized as centers of biodiversity and during the past decades, ancient lakes have emerged as an important topic in the fields of systematics, paleontology, evolutionary biology, and conservational biology. Given this growing interest, an international workshop on "Speciation in Ancient Lakes" was held in Belgium in March 1993, and it was decided to establish SIAL as an international organization in order to stimulate interactions between scientists working on ancient lakes (see http://www.sial-online.org ).
    [Show full text]
  • Les Zones Clés Pour La Biodiversité D'eau Douce Dans Le Hotspot Du
    Les Zones clés pour la biodiversité douce d’eau dans le hotspot du bassin méditerranéen Les Zones clés pour la biodiversité d’eau douce dans le hotspot du bassin méditerranéen Un éclairage pour la conservation des espèces et la planification du développement dans les écosystèmes d’eau douce Darwall W., Carrizo S., Numa C., Barrios V., Freyhof J. et Smith K. UNION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE SIÈGE MONDIAL Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland, Suisse Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0002 www.iucn.org Document occasionnel de la Commission de la sauvegarde des espèces de l’UICN No. 52 UICN La terminologie géographique employée dans cet ouvrage, de même que sa présentation, ne sont en aucune manière l’expression d’une opinion quelconque de la part de l’UICN ou des autres organisations concernées sur le statut juridique ou l’autorité de quelque pays, territoire ou région que ce soit, ou sur la délimitation de ses frontières. Les opinions exprimées dans cette publication ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles de l’UICN ou des autres organisations concernées. L’UICN et les autres organisations concernées rejettent toute responsabilité en cas d’erreurs ou d’omissions intervenues lors de la traduction en français de ce document dont la version originale est en anglais. Publié par : UICN, Gland, Suisse, Cambridge, Royaume-Uni et Malaga, Espagne Droits d’auteur : © 2015 Union internationale pour la conservation de la nature et de ses ressources La reproduction de cette publication à des fins commerciales, notamment en vue de la vente, est interdite sans autorisation écrite préalable du détenteur des droits d’auteur à condition que la source soit dûment citée.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Evolutionary Ethology of Fishes Conference
    Ecology and Evolutionary Ethology of Fishes Conference Montreal, Quebec June 17-20, 2018 2018 Organizing Committee Bryan Neff Western University Pedro Peres-Neto Concordia University Dylan Fraser Concordia University James Grant Concordia University Conference Venue John Molson Building 1600 Boulevard de Maisonneuve O Montréal, QC H3H 1J5 Conference facility map (9th floor) 2 Where to eat Coffee/Breakfast Tim Hortons Starbucks Fast Food A&W Canada Thai Express McDonalds Restaurants (Walking distance) Chateau Kabab La Pizzella Devi L’Acadamie (BYOB) Bis (Fine dining) Europea (Fine dining) Brutopia (Brew pub) Copper Branch (Vegan) Panthere Verte (Vegan) *Rue Crescent has many more restaurants with terraces for fine-weather dining Classic Montreal Foods (Taxi recommended) Poutine – Labanquise, 994 Rue Rachel E (expect to wait in line at peak times) Montreal Smoked Meat – Schwartz’s Deli, 3895 St Laurent Blvd 3 Conference Schedule Sunday, June 17, 2018 First floor atrium 17:00-20:00 Registration Room EFG 17:00-20:00 Welcome reception Monday, June 18, 2018 7:45-9:00 Coffee available (Room EFG) First floor atrium 8:00-9:00 Registration Room AB Keynote presentations 8:45-9:00 Opening remarks 9:00-9:45 Lauren Chapman Hot fish in a warming world: effects of dual stressors on energetics and performance of African equatorial fishes 9:45-10:30 Jeff Hutchings Adaptive significance of life-history variability in landlocked Atlantic salmon 10:30-11:00 Coffee break (Room EFG) Room AB Room CD Atlantic salmon symposium General session 11:00-11:20 Grant,
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of Rainbow Trout
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2006 Genetic analysis of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Strain identification via microsatellites and analysis of expressed sequence tags in intestine, liver, kidney, and ovary Amanda B. Stewart West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Stewart, Amanda B., "Genetic analysis of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Strain identification via microsatellites and analysis of expressed sequence tags in intestine, liver, kidney, and ovary" (2006). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4272. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4272 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genetic Analysis of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Strain Identification via Microsatellites and Analysis of Expressed Sequence Tags in Intestine, Liver, Kidney, and Ovary Amanda B. Stewart Dissertation submitted to the College of Agriculture, Forestry and Consumer Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Agricultural Sciences Robert A.
    [Show full text]