DOCSLIB.ORG

Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project Origin Energy Eraring Pty Ltd Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions IA193700-0100-EN-RPT-006 | 1 10 April 2019 Geotechnical Investigation - R esponse to Submissi ons Origin Energ y Eraring Pty Ltd Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project Project No: IA193700 Document Title: Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions Document No.: IA193700-0100-EN-RPT-006 Revision: 1 Date: 10 April 2019 Client Name: Origin Energy Eraring Pty Ltd Client No: Project Manager: Mike Luger Author: Thomas Muddle File Name: J:\IE\Projects\04_Eastern\IA193700\Geotech EIS\IA193700_Origin_Shoalhaven Pumped Hydro_Geotech Investigations_RtS_rev1.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 7, 177 Pacific Highway North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia PO Box 632 North Sydney NSW 2059 Australia T +61 2 9928 2100 F +61 2 9928 2444 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1 10/04/2019 Final Report form TM LB ML IA193700-0100-EN-RPT-006 i Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions Contents 1. Background ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Project Overview .............................................................................................................................. 1 3. Assessment Process ....................................................................................................................... 1 4. Submissions ..................................................................................................................................... 1 4.1 Public Feedback - Submission number 315472 ................................................................................. 2 4.2 NSW Department of Planning & Environment – Division of Resources & Geoscience, Geological Survey of New South Wales Comment .............................................................................................. 2 4.3 RMS Comments ................................................................................................................................. 2 4.4 OEH Submissions .............................................................................................................................. 4 4.4.1 Impacts to Morton National Park ........................................................................................................ 4 4.4.2 Biodiversity ......................................................................................................................................... 4 4.4.3 Heritage .............................................................................................................................................. 6 4.5 Shoalhaven Council Comment ........................................................................................................... 7 4.6 Environmental Protection Authority Comment ................................................................................... 7 4.7 Department of Industry Comment ...................................................................................................... 7 4.8 WaterNSW Comment ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.9 RFS Comment .................................................................................................................................... 9 5. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix A. Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project – Geotechnical Investigations Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Revision 2 IA193700-0100-EN-RPT-006 ii Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions 1. Background Origin Energy Eraring Pty Ltd (a subsidiary of Origin Energy Limited) (collectively, Origin) is the current operator of the Shoalhaven Pumped Hydro Energy Storage Scheme (the existing scheme). The existing scheme is located in the New South Wales (NSW) Southern Highlands, approximately 150km south east of Sydney. The existing scheme was commissioned in 1977 and currently has a generating capacity of 240MW. Origin now proposes to almost double the electricity generation capacity of the existing scheme with the Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project, which will provide approximately an additional 235MW of pumped storage generation capacity. Origin has completed a pre-feasibility study and is now undertaking a feasibility study for the Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project. To confirm the feasibility of the Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project, geotechnical investigations are required to provide confidence that the below ground structures can be constructed and operated safely and cost effectively. The Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project, including geotechnical investigations, was declared to be State significant infrastructure and critical State significant infrastructure (CSSI) by an amendment made to the State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 (SRD SEPP) on 14 December 2018. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project was publicly exhibited from 22 February 2019 to 23 March 2019. This letter responds to the submissions made in relation to the Project. 2. Project Overview The geotechnical investigations are proposed on land owned by WaterNSW associated with the existing Kangaroo Valley and Bendeela Power Stations and water transfer operations. Locations 1, 2, 7 and 8 are positioned in currently cleared areas with evidence of prior ground disturbance and with existing established access tracks. Locations 3, 4 and 5 are positioned within areas previously cleared for agricultural purposes that have revegetated naturally following the exclusion of agriculture. Location 6 is within an area that appears to be have been partially cleared and subsequently naturally revegetated. Access to borehole locations 3, 4, 5 and 6 would require limited clearing of shrubs to ground level to establish approximately 500 metres of temporary access tracks up to two-metre-wide to facilitate the access of drill rigs, and daily travel of support vehicles and utility vehicles. No excavation of the ground surface would be undertaken, and large, mature vegetation and other habitat features will be avoided. 3. Assessment Process The Project was declared to be Critical SSI for the purpose of the EP&A Act on 14 December 2018. Origin lodged a State significant infrastructure application report with the Department of Planning and Environment (DP&E) on 18 December 2018 and was issued with Environmental Assessment Requirements (EARs) on 25 January 2019. In preparing the EARs, the DP&E received input from each of the Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Office of Environment and Heritage, WaterNSW and Shoalhaven Council. The EIS was prepared to address these EARs and was placed on public exhibition for four weeks, between 22 February 2019 and 23 March 2019, during which time submissions were invited. The submissions received were collated by the DP&E and provided to Origin for review and response. 4. Submissions The following submissions were received in relation to the Project: • Submissions, categorised as comments, were received from eight government agencies; and IA193700-0100-EN-RPT-006 1 Geotechnical Investigation - Response to Submissions • 1 submission, categorised as an objection, was received from a member of the general public. The following sections respond to each submission. 4.1 Public Feedback - Submission number 315472 One objection was received from the public during the exhibition period. This submission consists of a general objection to pumped hydro and suggested alternatives in terms of electricity generation and storage. The full submission is available at http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/?action=view_submission&job_id=9816&submission_id=315472 The submission does not relate to the geotechnical investigations, and does not contain any explicit objection to the geotechnical investigations. The issues and alternatives raised will be considered as part of the main works EIS. 4.2 NSW Department of Planning & Environment – Division of Resources & Geoscience, Geological Survey of New South Wales Comment Thank you for the opportunity to provide advice on the above matter. This is a response from NSW Department of Planning & Environment – Division of Resources & Geoscience, Geological Survey of New South Wales (GSNSW). GSNSW has reviewed the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Shoalhaven Hydro Expansion Project within the Shoalhaven LGA. As the study area does not preclude access to known resources or exploration for future resource discovery and extraction, and there are no intended biodiversity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Professionals Australia's Response on Behalf of Members in Relation to The
    Professionals Australia’s response on behalf of members in relation to the proposed restructure PA met with engineers who work in the Engineering Division on two occasions at WNSW Parramatta offices with members dialling-in from regional NSW. PA encouraged members to put forward their professional views on the proposed restructure on whether it addressed existing problems. PA has received some very detailed responses from our members. It is clear there is a high level of concern that the restructure will have undesired impacts on both employees and the functions of Engineering. Many members have taken the opportunity to respond directly to the WNSW email address set up for feedback. This submission does not repeat those comments. This submission is concerned with the first order issue – Does the restructure enhance the undertaking of engineering functions by WaterNSW or not? The next level of concerns which appear to be the main focus of the input provided via the WNSW email are the detail of position descriptions and the arrangements for filling the structure. We understand such matters have also attracted a large number of comments and concerns from members. However, those issues arise only when the first order issue is satisfied. The focus of this submission is whether the restructure has accurately identified the deficiencies and whether the proposal will address those deficiencies. What can a restructure address? A restructure can address issues such as resourcing levels, specific function focus and functional alignment. It cannot address issues caused by dysfunctional organisational behaviour, lack of effective processes, etc. Does the restructure enhance engineering functions at WNSW? The view of WNSW engineers is that overall the restructure will not result in the enhanced performance of the engineering functions required by WNSW.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canberra • B Ush Walking Club ( Inc. Newsletter
    THE CANBERRA • B USH WALKING CLUB ( INC. NEWSLETTER GPO Box 160, Canberra ACT 2601 VOLUME 36 October 2000 NUMBER 10 OCTOBER GENERAL MEETING 8pm Wednesday 18th Speaker: Betty Kitchener, on 'Field First Aid' Woden Library Community Room Make the most of the evening and join other members at 6. OOpm for a convivial meal at the Chinese Kitchen 6)10 Restaurant in Corinna Street, Shop 091, Woden Plaza, Phi/lip. to be early to ensure there will be ample time to finish and still get to the meeting in good ti PRESIDENT'S • Membership fees have been increased to $25 (single) and Also In This Issue: PRATTLE $33 (household) Item Page • The Club transport rate has PRESIDENT'S PRATTLE For those of you who were unable been increased to to make last month's Annual Gen- MEMBERSHIP MATTERS 2 30cents/kilometrelvehicle. eral Meeting, the key outcomes are MOTIONS PASSED AT AGM 2 as follows: Contact details for the Committee " are shown on the back page of each 39 ANNUAL REPORT 2 We have four brand new Com- It. Please don't hesitate to give us a CBC 40th ANNIVERSARY 4 mittee members - Ailsa Brown call if you have concerns about the TRIP PREVIEWS 4 (Publisher), Michael Macona- way we are doing things or have chie (Conservation Officer), some suggestions for how we might WALKS WAFFLE 5 Michael Sutton (Treasurer), do things better. A bit of praise LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. 6 and Rosanne Walker (Social from time to time helps keep us TRIP REPORTS 7 Secretary), replacing Vance going so do let us know if we do Brown, Janet Edstein, Cate something that pleases you.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Genoa River Correa Correa Lawrenciana Var
    Action S tatement Flora and F auna Guarantee Act 1988 No. 21 7 Genoa River Correa Correa lawrenciana var. genoensis This Action Statement is based on a draft Recovery Plan prepared for this species by DSE under contract to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Description Genoa River Correa (Correa lawrenciana var. genoensis ) is an erect to spreading shrub which grows to 2 m in height (Walsh & Entwisle 1999). It has ovate leaves to 7 x 4 cm. The upper leaf surface is dark green, glossy and hairless; the lower surface is pale grey-green and densely covered with stellate hairs (Walsh & Entwisle 1999). The leaf margins are smooth. The flowers tend to be solitary, are drooping, yellow-green and tubular, with four curved, triangular lobes at the end of tube. They are hairy outside, and grow to 25 mm long (Walsh & Entwisle 1999; DNRE 2001). The calyx is hemispherical, more or less hairless, up to 5 mm long, and has four conspicuous teeth. The Genoa River Correa stamens protrude from the flower. Flowering (Photo:DSE/McCann ) largely occurs in spring (Walsh & Entwisle 1999). Genoa River Correa differs from the type variety in its prominently gland-dotted calyx with long acuminate lobes (Wilson 1961). The key to Mountain Correa ( Correa lawrenciana ) varieties in Walsh & Entwisle (1999) further distinguishes the Genoa Correa ( C. lawrenciana var. genoensis ) as having a green and glabrescent calyx. Distribution Genoa River Correa is restricted to a few very small populations in far-east Victoria fringing the Genoa River, and one population in south-eastern New South Wales, fringing Redstone Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Potential Pumped Hydro Energy Storage
    Future Potential Pumped Hydro Energy Storage in Australia For personal use only OCTOBER 2015 WHAT IS PUMPED STORAGE? Upper Reservoir Pumping Mode Lower . During Off-Peak Reservoir . Wholesale prices at their lowest . Power is drawn from the grid to pump Powerhouse water from the lower to the upper reservoir Upper Reservoir Generating Mode Lower . During daily Peaks Reservoir For personal use only . Wholesale prices at their highest Powerhouse . Water is released from the upper reservoir to the lower reservoir to generate electricity 2 PUMPED STORAGE IN THE MARKET Peaking power generation is usually supplied by Open Cycle Gas Turbines Diesel Generators Pumped Hydro $/MWh Demand (MW) 100 8000 Price Demand 80 7000 Baseload 60 6000 40 5000 For personal use only 20 4000 0 3000 12:00:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 3:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 1:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 4:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 3 Illustrative interaction of price and demand PUMPED STORAGE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY GROWTH OF RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION UNIQUE ENERGY GENERATION MIX IN QUEENSLAND . Intermittent generation . Coal fired Baseload Power . Excess generation during low demand . Gas Peaking Power . Need for large scale energy storage . Effect of rising gas prices on OCGTs & CCGTs . Potential for integration with renewable . Opportunity for low cost/low emission generation peaking generation Generation by Fuel Type (MW) QLD NSW VIC Royalla Solar Farm SA TAS For personal use only 0 3000 6000 9000 Black Coal Brown Coal Gas Liquid Fuel Other Hydro Wind Large Solar APVI Small Solar* Cathedral Rocks Wind Farm 4 PUMPED STORAGE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY .
    [Show full text]
  • RECREATIONAL FISHING Fishing Fee Receipt Is Current
    INTRODUCTION TO FURTHER INFORMATION A GUIDE TO Before fishing in NSW waters it’s always a good idea to check bag limits, protection laws and make sure your RECREATIONAL FISHING fishing fee receipt is current. For more information refer RECREATIONAL to details below. Fishing from banks as well as from boats is a popular pastime of locals and visitors within the Goulburn NSW Recreational Fishing Licences can be obtained via region. There are a number of ideal locations for you Service NSW: FISHING to explore, where you can go fishing for a variety of 267 Auburn Street, Goulburn NSW 2580 IN GOULBURN species (as listed in this brochure). Phone: 1300 369 365 or visit: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fishing When fishing, be sure that, unless you are exempt, Sources: you have paid the NSW recreational fishing fee Animal Species in Goulburn Mulwaree. (2011, 12 1). and have the receipt for current payment in your Retrieved 1 12, 2006, from Commissioner of the Environment immediate possession. All money raised from NSW for Sustainability: http://www.envcomm.act.gov.au/soe/ recreational fishing fees is placed into recreational soe2004/GoulburnMulwaree/nativespeciesanimals.htm#fish fishing trusts and spent on a variety of programs such Goulburn Mulwaree Council, Parks and Recreation Dep. (NA). as improving recreational fishing facilities (eg. fishing Recreational Fishing. Goulburn, NSW, Australia. platforms, cleaning tables, boat ramps, artificial reefs Office of Environment and Heritage. (1998). etc.), policing illegal fishing and stocking of fish in Tarlo River National Park Plan of Management. local dams and rivers (see back for details).
    [Show full text]
  • Sydneyœsouth Coast Region Irrigation Profile
    SydneyœSouth Coast Region Irrigation Profile compiled by Meredith Hope and John O‘Connor, for the W ater Use Efficiency Advisory Unit, Dubbo The Water Use Efficiency Advisory Unit is a NSW Government joint initiative between NSW Agriculture and the Department of Sustainable Natural Resources. © The State of New South Wales NSW Agriculture (2001) This Irrigation Profile is one of a series for New South Wales catchments and regions. It was written and compiled by Meredith Hope, NSW Agriculture, for the Water Use Efficiency Advisory Unit, 37 Carrington Street, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, with assistance from John O'Connor (Resource Management Officer, Sydney-South Coast, NSW Agriculture). ISBN 0 7347 1335 5 (individual) ISBN 0 7347 1372 X (series) (This reprint issued May 2003. First issued on the Internet in October 2001. Issued a second time on cd and on the Internet in November 2003) Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by the author for NSW Agriculture, for and on behalf of the State of New South Wales, in good faith on the basis of available information. While the information contained in the document has been formulated with all due care, the users of the document must obtain their own advice and conduct their own investigations and assessments of any proposals they are considering, in the light of their own individual circumstances. The document is made available on the understanding that the State of New South Wales, the author and the publisher, their respective servants and agents accept no responsibility for any person, acting on, or relying on, or upon any opinion, advice, representation, statement of information whether expressed or implied in the document, and disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information contained in the document or by reason of any error, omission, defect or mis-statement (whether such error, omission or mis-statement is caused by or arises from negligence, lack of care or otherwise).
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Pumped Hydro Roadmap
    NSW Pumped Hydro Roadmap December 2018 December 2018 © Crown Copyright, State of NSW through its Department of Planning and Environment 2018 Cover image: Warragamba Dam, WaterNSW Disclaimer The State of NSW does not guarantee or warrant, and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained in or referred to in this publication. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure this document is correct at time of printing, the State of NSW, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. Information in this publication is provided as general information only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from a qualified professional. The State of NSW recommends that you exercise care and use your own skill and judgment in using information from this publication and that users carefully evaluate the accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance of such information in this publication and, where appropriate, seek professional advice. Nothing in this publication should be taken to indicate the State of NSW’s commitment to a particular course of action. Copyright notice In keeping with the NSW Government’s commitment to encourage the availability of information, you are welcome to reproduce the material that appears in the NSW Pumped Hydro Roadmap. This material is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Translucency Rules in NSW Inland Rivers
    SCOPING REVIEW Translucency rules in NSW inland rivers Effectiveness and alternative scenario review Department of Industry—Water | water.nsw.gov.au Review of translucency rules in NSW inland rivers Published by the NSW Department of Industry—Water Review of translucency rules in NSW inland rivers. Effectiveness and alternative scenario review First published: February 2018 More information Department of Industry—Water. water.nsw.gov.au Acknowledgments Cover image: Wyangala 103% 5th March 2012 – Casey Proctor, Lachlan Land Services. INT17/48024 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Industry, 2016. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the NSW Department of Industry as the owner. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2016). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser. 2 Review of translucency rules in NSW inland rivers Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................................6 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL CATCHMENT STRATEGY Improving Natural Resource Outcomes in East Gippsland Copyright © East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority 2008
    REGIONAL CATCHMENT STRATEGY Improving Natural Resource Outcomes in East Gippsland Copyright © East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority 2008 Published by the East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority 574 Main Street (PO Box 1012), Bairnsdale Victoria 3875 Australia Phone: 03 51520600 www.egcma.com.au ISBN: 978-0-9758164-4-8 Copyright Statement The material in this booklet is copyright. The material in this booklet can be copied, printed and displayed in an unmodified form for personal use, or by State educational institutions, government departments and natural resource agencies and groups for non-commercial purposes. The source should be acknowledged. No part may be reproduced, communicated, modified or stored for commercial purposes without the written permission of the East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Pearson, John Title: Regional catchment strategy: improving natural resource outcomes in East Gippsland Subjects: Natural resources-Management-Victoria-Gippsland. Conservation of natural resources-Victoria-Gippsland. Watershed management-Government policy-Victoria-Gippsland. Waterways-Environmental aspects-Victoria-Gippsland. Land use-Environmental aspects-Victoria-Gippsland. Dewey Number: 333.7099456 Disclaimer The material in this booklet is provided as a guide only. The East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority cannot take responsibility for any errors. Users should make their own inquiries regarding their use of the material published in this booklet. EAST GIPPSLAND CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY REGIONAL CATCHMENT STRATEGY Improving Natural Resource Outcomes in East Gippsland John Pearson Communications Coordinator East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority September 2008 FOREWORD The Regional Catchment Strategy, which was developed following consultation with communities in East Gippsland identifies the priorities, objectives and targets for the management of the natural assets in our region.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Recreational Freshwater Fishing Guide 2020-21
    NSW Recreational Freshwater Fishing Guide 2020–21 www.dpi.nsw.gov.au Report illegal fishing 1800 043 536 Check out the app:FishSmart NSW DPI has created an app Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology. that provides recreational fishers with 24/7 access to essential information they need to know to fish in NSW, such as: ▢ a pictorial guide of common recreational species, bag & size limits, closed seasons and fishing gear rules ▢ record and keep your own catch log and opt to have your best fish pictures selected to feature in our in-app gallery ▢ real-time maps to locate nearest FADs (Fish Aggregation Devices), artificial reefs, Recreational Fishing Havens and Marine Park Zones ▢ DPI contact for reporting illegal fishing, fish kills, ▢ local weather, tide, moon phase and barometric pressure to help choose best time to fish pest species etc. and local Fisheries Offices ▢ guides on spearfishing, fishing safely, trout fishing, regional fishing ▢ DPI Facebook news. Welcome to FishSmart! See your location in Store all your Contact Fisheries – relation to FADs, Check the bag and size See featured fishing catches in your very Report illegal Marine Park Zones, limits for popular species photos RFHs & more own Catch Log fishing & more Contents i ■ NSW Recreational Fishing Fee . 1 ■ Where do my fishing fees go? .. 3 ■ Working with fishers . 7 ■ Fish hatcheries and fish stocking . 9 ■ Responsible fishing . 11 ■ Angler access . 14 ■ Converting fish lengths to weights. 15 ■ Fishing safely/safe boating . 17 ■ Food safety . 18 ■ Knots and rigs . 20 ■ Fish identification and measurement . 27 ■ Fish bag limits, size limits and closed seasons .
    [Show full text]
  • RP1013: Distributed Energy Storage Draft Scoping Study Issues Paper Jessie Copper, Iain Macgill and Alistair Sproul
    RP1013: Distributed Energy Storage Draft Scoping Study Issues Paper Jessie Copper, Iain MacGill and Alistair Sproul Authors Jessie Copper, Iain MacGill and Alistair Sproul. Other project contributors are Peter Pudney and Wasim Saman. Title Distributed Energy Storage: Draft Scoping Study Issues Paper ISBN Format Keywords Editor Publisher Series ISSN Preferred citation Distributed Energy Storage Issues Paper 2 Acknowledgements The research in RP1013: Enabling Better Utilisation of Distributed Generation with Distributed Storage is funded by the CRC for Low Carbon Living Ltd, supported by the Cooperative Research Centres program, an Australian Government initiative The key academic project partners for this scoping study are the University of NSW and the University of South Australia. Distributed Energy Storage Issues Paper 3 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Peer Review Statement .................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]