The Epistle of James – Parts One & Two
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
"A Right Strawy Epistle": Reformation Perspectives on James Timothy George
"A Right Strawy Epistle": Reformation Perspectives on James Timothy George The history of theology is the story of how the church has interpreted the Bible. While many other factors must also be taken into account, the church has always tried to define its faith in terms of its grasp of the Word of God in Holy Scripture.1 This principle has important implications for the way we study the Bible today. It requires that we take seriously the exegetical tradition of the church as an indispensable aid for a contemporary interpretation of the Bible. It is not enough to come to the study of the text with the New Testament in one hand (even if we read it in the original Greek! ) and the latest commentary in the other. We must also.examine carefully bow God has spoken in his Word to other Christians of different ages, in various cultures and life settings. How they have understood—and misunderstood—the Scriptures will significantly supplement our own investigation of the text. The Scriptures have spoken in new and fresh and powerful ways through out the history of the church. Tb take but one example, Paul's reinterpretation of Habakkuk's dictum, "The just shall live by faith," rediscovered by Martin Luther through whom it was reclaimed by John Wesley, reemerged as a pivotal text in Karl Barth's Commentary on Romans. As faithful members of the "communion of saints/' that is, the church extended throughout time as well as space, we cannot close our ears to the living witness of the Scriptures through the ages. -
James Chapter 2
James Chapter 2 Verses 1-13: James begins this passage on partiality with an exhortation (verse 1), then a brief illustration (verses 2-4). Most of this discussion is an argument against partiality (verses 5-13). First, partiality shows inconsistency in one’s conduct: Those we spurn are the ones God has chosen (verse 5), and shows inconsistency in one’s conduct: those we favor are the godless whom God rejects (verses 6-7). Second, partiality is more than an error in judgment; it is an act of sin. The one who shows respect of persons is a transgressor of the law. The law is like a ring or hedge encircling those within. When one breaks this ring, he stands outside (verse 10), becoming a transgressor, whether he commits adultery, murder, or shows partiality. Third, James argues that partiality provokes God’s judgment (verses 12-13). James 2:1 "My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons." “The faith”: This refers not to the act of believing, but to the entire Christian faith (Jude 3), which has as its central focus Jesus Christ. “Our Lord Jesus Christ”: Christ is the one who reveals the glory of God (John 1:14; 2 Cor. 4:4-6; Heb. 1:1-3). In His incarnation, He showed only impartiality (Matt. 22:16). For example, consider the non-elite people included in His genealogy, His choice of the humble village of Nazareth as His residence for 30 years, and His willingness to minister in Galilee and Samaria, both regions held in contempt by Israel’s leaders. -
Life with Augustine
Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture. -
1 James 2:1-13, No. 7 November 29, 2015 the Rev. Dr. Robert S. Rayburn We Begin a New Section of James with Another of His More
1 James 2:1-13, No. 7 November 29, 2015 The Rev. Dr. Robert S. Rayburn We begin a new section of James with another of his more than 50 imperatives that punctuate his short letter. Now the subject is partiality, treating people differently depending on their social class or wealth. We call this “respect of persons” or “favoritism.” [Motyer, 80] James has just written about how true religion demonstrates itself in care for widows and orphans. Perhaps that thought prompted him to write the next section, though widows and orphans are not mentioned and are not specifically the poor James now writes about. Text Comment v.1 Jesus is mentioned only twice in the letter, but honor is certainly paid to him with the title James bestows on his elder brother, “the Lord of glory,” a title we find elsewhere in the New Testament, for example in 1 Cor. 2:8. It can be understood in different ways but it definitely contributes to the NT witness to the deity of Jesus Christ. v.4 I’ll return to this shortly, but don’t imagine that this is some kind of exaggeration on James’ part. Precisely this kind of public distinction between the rich and the poor was a commonplace of life in those days and in saying this James was requiring his Christian readers to break ranks with their culture in a way likely to bring real offense. But to behave as if such distinctions of class and wealth mattered was to abandon the gospel ground and set one’s feet firmly back in the world. -
Sermon Reflection Bible Study General Questions
DISCUSSION GUIDE WEEK ONE POISONOUS PARTIALITY, PART 1 James 2:1-7 SERMON REFLECTION 1. Describe one of your main takeaways from this Sunday’s sermon. 2. What did you learn about partiality that you can apply to your life this week? BIBLE STUDY 1. What practical example does James give to illustrate partiality or favoritism? What other forms might this type of favoritism take? 2. What is the connection in this story between the clothing details (v. 2) and what James calls “evil thoughts (v. 4)”? 3. James does not say that the poor inherit the kingdom simply because they are poor. What is the determining factor in verse 5 as to whether or not a person will be an heir of the kingdom? GENERAL QUESTIONS 1. Why might people be tempted to give special treatment to the wealthy? 2. Can this prohibition against favoritism be applied to worldly attributes other than wealth? If so, which attributes? 3. How do we contradict our identity in Christ if we give special treatment to the wealthy? See Matthew 6:19-20; Luke 18:22; Ephesians 1:18; 3:16; and Hebrews 11:26. 4. Why is showing favoritism on the basis of wealth or other worldly attributes contrary to the character of God? See Deuteronomy 10:17-18; Leviticus 19:15; Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; and Ephesians 6:9 FAMILY DISCIPLESHIP Use the questions below from the Sunday Field Guide from Children’s Ministries to help you engage your children in this week’s sermon. For additional questions and direction on discipling your kids this week, check out the full Sunday Field Guide. -
What Do We Do with a Passage Like James 2:14-26 in Light of the Clear Teaching of the New Testament on Justification by Faith?
What to do with James 2? James 2:14-26 What do we do with a passage like James 2:14-26 in light of the clear teaching of the New Testament on justification by faith? I want us to look once again at James 2:14-26. This passage has been the subject of much debate throughout the years. In fact, the Book of James had a tough beginning because many thought it did not belong in the Bible. • The Muratorian, in 190 AD or later, provides us with the earliest accepted list of New Testament books, and it disputes seven of the ones in our Bible today, one of which is James. • By the 3rd century, about 150 years after Jesus’ death, Irenaeus and Tertullian had confirmed that only 20 of our 27 books were accepted as scripture. James did not make the cut. o The first appearance of the exact list of our present 27-book New Testament was in the Festal Letter of St. Athanasius, in 367 A.D. James made the cut. o The New Testament canon was not settled until the Council of Carthage in A.D. 397. James was officially in the New Testament. ISSUES WITH JAMES Martin Luther, the initiator of the Reformation—the event that forever changed the trajectory of the church, breaking away from the Catholic church, on the basis of Christ alone, faith alone, and grace alone—took issue with the book of James. He didn’t think it expressed the “nature of the Gospel,” and it seemed to contradict Paul’s statements concerning justification by faith. -
James 2:1-13 Favoritism Condemned
James 2:1-13 Favoritism Condemned Please turn in your Bible this morning to James the 2nd chapter where I’m going to be reading the first 13 verses. And I’m going to ask you to stand, out of respect for God’s Word, as I read our sermon text this morning. Read James 2:1-13 So far in our study of this book, James has been talking about our reactions to things. • Our reaction when we find ourselves in the midst of trials or temptations • Our reaction to God’s Word and what it has to say about how to live our lives. We specifically talked about spring boarding off of God’s Word to go “beyond the rim.” And I want to congratulate many of you who I’ve had conversations with that took that to heart and are looking at ways to allow God to stretch you and go beyond what’s necessarily safe or comfortable for the sake of God’s call to love others. And I want to encourage you more and more in that. • Today, James is talking about our contrasting reactions to the rich and poor among us or preferential treatment of others. In light of today’s focus I want to share with you a great example of this that happened just yesterday in Indianapolis, Indiana. Perhaps some of you heard of Sarah Cummins. Sarah was engaged to be married to Logan Arajo until a week ago when they called off the wedding. However, this was to late to be able to cancel many of the wedding related events, which totaled about $30,000. -
1 & 2 Peter and Jude (Macarthur New Testament Commentary)
Table of Contents 1 Peter 2 Peter & Jude 1 PETER MOODY PUBLISHERS/CHICAGO Contents CHAPTER PAGE Preface vii Introduction to 1 Peter 1 1. The Elements of Election (1 Peter 1:1–2) 13 2. The Believer’s Eternal Inheritance (1 Peter 1:3–5) 29 3. Salvation Joy (1 Peter 1:6–9) 39 4. Salvation’s Greatness (1 Peter 1:10–12) 49 5. The Believer’s Response to Salvation (1 Peter 1:13–17) 61 6. The Wonder of Redemption (1 Peter 1:18–21) 71 7. Supernatural Love (1 Peter 1:22–25) 87 8. Desiring the Word (1 Peter 2:1–3) 95 9. Spiritual Privileges—Part 1:Union with Christ and 103 Access to God (1 Peter 2:4–5) 10. Spiritual Privileges—Part 2:Security in Christ, 119 Affection for Christ,Election by Christ,and Dominion with Christ (1 Peter 2:6–9b) 11. Spiritual Privileges—Part 3:Separation to Christ, 127 Possession by Christ,Illumination in Christ,Compassion from Christ,and Proclamation of Christ (1 Peter 2:9c–10) 12. Godly Living (1 Peter 2:11–12) 135 13. Submission to Civil Authority (1 Peter 2:13–17) 143 14. Submission in the Workplace (1 Peter 2:18–21a) 155 15. The Suffering Jesus (1 Peter 2:21b–25) 165 16. Winning an Unsaved Spouse (1 Peter 3:1–7) 175 17. Living and Loving the Good Life (1 Peter 3:8–12) 185 18. Securities Against a Hostile World (1 Peter 3:13–17) 195 19. The Triumph of Christ’s Suffering (1 Peter 3:18–22) 205 20. -
James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: an Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St
Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: ___________________________________________ Thomas Jared Farmer, April 2, 2012 James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: An Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St. James By Thomas Jared Farmer Master of Theological Studies Candler School of Theology _________________________________________ Signature Dr. Luke Timothy Johnson _________________________________________ Signature Dr. Steven J. Kraftchick _________________________________________ Signature Dr. Walter T. Wilson James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: An Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St. James By Thomas Jared Farmer B.A., University of Illinois Springfield, 2010 Thesis Committee Chair: Luke Timothy Johnson, PhD. An abstract of A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Candler School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Theological Studies May 2012 ABSTRACT James in the “Q” Sayings Tradition: An Examination of the Jesus Logia in the Epistle of St. James By Thomas Jared Farmer The present investigation concerns itself with assessing the relationship between the Epistle of James and the sayings traditions of Jesus, as found in the Synoptics. -
Canonical Reception History of James
JETS 60/4 (2017): 767–80 DOES NEGLECT MEAN REJECTION? CANONICAL RECEPTION HISTORY OF JAMES CHRIS S. STEVENS* Abstract: Canonicity debates have pivoted on various criteria over the centuries. Today, au- thorship, a primary criterion, is complicated by concerns about pseudonymity and challenges to the linguistic abilities of the apostles. Recent work by David Nienhuis proposes James to be a pseudonymous second-century document. Nienhuis exploits the historical silence and perceived neglect of the Epistle of James to create a scenario against traditional authorship positions. This paper evaluates the validity of his argument. Despite his thorough monograph, underap- preciated aspects of the evidence weaken his work. The case against James being the author of the eponymous epistle put forth by Nienhuis is reexamined on a number of fronts. The evidence suggests that the author was in a position of early ecclesiastical authority, one like James the Just held during the first century. Key words: James, canon, Nienhuis, canonical history, papyri, linguistic dimensions, pseudonymity Debates over the NT canon are receiving reNewed iNterest. While there are new methods of inquiry and newer questions, nevertheless, the debates remain the same. Perhaps no NT text is more debated than the Epistle of James. In fact, NearlY fifty years ago James Brooks said James “had a more difficult time iN acquiriNg canonical status” than other texts.1 David NieNhuis further contends, “No other letter in the NT contains as maNY troubliNg aNd ambiguous features, aNd to this daY no scholarlY consensus exists regarding its point of origin.”2 The seNtimeNt is Not new. Martin Luther called James “an epistle of straw” that “mangles the Scriptures and thereby opposes Paul and all Scripture.”3 Luther eveN put James aNd the other Catholic Epistles (CE) in a different order in an attempt to diminish their canonical significance.4 Determining the canonical reception history of James is not easy. -
James 2 Resources
James 2 Resources JAMES 1 JAMES 3 RESOURCES RESOURCES Click chart to enlarge Chart from recommended resource Jensen's Survey of the NT - used by permission JAMES Faith for Living Motives Outreach The Place of Works: for of Outward Demonstration of Inner Faith Works Works Jas 1:1-18 Jas 1:19-2:13 Jas 2:14-25 Jas 3:1-12 Jas 3:13-4:12 Jas 4:13-5:12 Jas 5:13-19 Trials & Word & Faith & Tongue Wars Future Others Temptations Works Works Faith Fulfill Favor Fallacy Fountain Factions Faith Faith In and the and our Testings FAITH AT WORK Future Fellowship JEREMY ADLER - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FAITH AND WORKS A Comparison of James 2:24 and Ephesians 2:8-10 -75 pages Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 HENRY ALFORD James 2 - less Greek James 2 GREG ALLEN James 2:1-7 Holding the Faith Without Partiality James 2:8-13 Practicing Merciful Judgment James 2:14-26 The Fruit of Faith DON ANDERSON - Teaching Resources Study Guide on James - 27 pages James Chart Scans (studies 1-12) AUDIO - Click here for the audios of the 12 lessons on James listed below averaging about 41 minutes each... 4 James 2:1-13 – Study 4 40:18 5 James 2:14-26 – Study 5 43:53 6 James 3:1-12 – Study 6 37:15 Teacher Notes on James James 2:1-13 – Study #4 James 2:14-26 – Study #5 More Notes on Each of the Preceding Studies James 2:1-13 – Study 4 James 2:14-26 – Study 5 MIKE ANDRUS James 2:1-13 When Favoritism and Prejudice Come to the Church James 2:14-26 Faith Without Works Doesn't Work! PAUL APPLE Well done commentary from modern perspective. -
I the Relationship Between Faith and Works: a Comparison of James 2
The Relationship Between Faith and Works: A Comparison of James 2:24 and Ephesians 2:8-10 By Jeremy T. Alder An Integrative Thesis Submitted to The Faculty of Reformed Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts THESIS ADVISOR: _______________________________ Rev. Kenneth J. McMullen RTS/VIRTUAL PRESIDENT: _______________________________ Dr. Andrew J. Peterson November 10, 2005 i ii To My Father In Loving Memory George Thomas Alder May 11, 1923—August 9, 2005 Who Dedicated His Life To Loving His Family “Family Comes First” I Miss You! ii ii iii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 THESIS STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL SURVEY OF THE THESIS ................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................... 4 CURRENT TRENDS ............................................................................................................ 4 CHAPTER 2: JAMES ................................................................................................... 10 GENERAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 10 Historical/Cultural...................................................................................................