<<

RESEARCH REPORT NO. 146, 2003

Catch composition of the Western Australian temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, 1994 to 1999

R. McAuley and C. Simpfendorfer

Fisheries Research Division WA Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH Western 6920 Fisheries Research Report Titles in the fisheries research series contain technical and scientific information that represents an important contribution to existing knowledge, but which may not be suitable for publication in national or international scientific journals.

Fisheries Research Reports may be cited as full publications. The full citation is: McAuley, R. and Simpfendorfer C. 2003. Catch composition of the Western Australian temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, 1994 to 1999, Fisheries Research Report No. 146, Department of Fisheries, , 78 pp.

Numbers 1-80 in this series were issued as Reports. Numbers 81-82 were issued as Fisheries Reports, and from number 83 the series has been issued under the current title.

Enquiries Department of Fisheries 3rd floor The Atrium 168-170 St George’s Terrace WA 6000 Telephone (08) 9482 7333 Facsimile (08) 9482 7389 Website: http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/res

Published by Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia. November 2003. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 1 877098 36 1

An electronic copy of this report will be available at the above website where parts may be shown in colour where this is thought to improve clarity.

Fisheries Research in Western Australia The Fisheries Research Division of the Department of Fisheries is based at the Western Australian Marine Research Laboratories, PO Box 20, North Beach (Perth), Western Australia, 6920. The Marine Research Laboratories serve as the centre for fisheries research in the State of Western Australia.

Research programs conducted by the Fisheries Research Division and laboratories investigate basic fish biology, stock identity and levels, population dynamics, environmental factors, and other factors related to commercial fisheries, recreational fisheries and . The Fisheries Research Division also maintains the State data base of catch and effort fisheries statistics.

The primary function of the Fisheries Research Division is to provide scientific advice to government in the formulation of management policies for developing and sustaining Western Australian fisheries. Contents

Page

1.0 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 History...... 1 1.2 Description of the gear...... 3 1.3 Objectives of this report...... 4 2.0 Methods ...... 5 2.1 Data collection ...... 5 2.2 Data analysis ...... 6 2.2.1 Commercial data...... 6 2.2.2 Research data...... 7 2.2.3 Catch estimation using research observed CPUE data ...... 8 2.2.4 Non fish ...... 8 3.0 Results...... 9 3.1 Effort ...... 9 3.2 Catch composition ...... 9 3.2.1 Commercial elasmobranch catch...... 9 3.2.2 Commercial teleost catch ...... 12 3.2.3 Research observed elasmobranch catch ...... 14 3.2.4 Research observed teleost catch...... 16 3.2.5 diversity...... 18 3.3 (CPUE)...... 18 3.4 Estimated commercial catch ...... 21 3.4.1 Elasmobranchs...... 21 3.4.2 Teleosts ...... 22 3.5 catch size composition...... 24 3.5.1 Whaler (family Carcharhinidae) ...... 24 3.5.2 Hound sharks (family Triakidae) ...... 27 3.5.3 Other sharks ...... 31 3.6 Scalefish catch size composition ...... 32 3.7 Non-fish bycatch...... 35 4.0 Discussion ...... 36 5.0 Acknowledgements...... 39 i 6.0 References ...... 40 7.0 Appendices ...... 43 Appendix I. Commercial demersal gillnet & longline catch and effort, July 1994 – June 1999...... 43 Appendix II. Total length – fork length relationships ...... 58 Appendix III. Length - Weight Relationships...... 59 Appendix IV. Size frequency statistics...... 63 Appendix V. Research Observed Catch, July 1994 – June 1999...... 65

ii Catch composition of the Western Australian temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, 1994 to 1999

Rory McAuley* and Colin Simpfendorfer** * WA Marine Research Laboratories, PO Box 20 North Beach, Western Australia 6920 Australia ** Center for Shark Research, Mote Marine Laboratory, 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway, Sarasota Florida 34236 USA

Abstract Catch composition data were collected from Western Australia’s temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, between Eucla and Geraldton, over a five-year period from July 1994 to June 1999. Results were compared to Department of Fisheries catch records compiled from fishers’ monthly catch returns. Discarded bycatch of several species was estimated by bootstrapping their observed catch rates. , obscurus, , Mustelus antarcticus, whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki, and , Heterodontus portusjacksoni, were identified as the main components of the fisheries’ catch, however, catches were found to vary regionally. , Galeorhinus galeus, dogfish of the family and the , Carcharhinus plumbeus, were regionally important in the south-east, mid-southern and west coast regions, respectively. Teleosts comprised between 5.4% and 16.6% of the total demersal gillnet and longline catch, with Buffalo bream, Kyphosus cornelii, West Australian Dhufish, Glaucosoma hebraicum and dusky morwong, Dactylophora nigricans identified as the main components of the teleost catch. Estimating catches from research catch per unit effort data indicated that catches of secondary elasmobranch species may have been underreported in returns. Records of non-fish bycatch were also compiled from observer data. The rates of capture of non-fish bycatch were low in all regions, with an overall occurrence of less than one capture per 1,000 kilometre gillnet hours.

1.0 Introduction

1.1 History Commercial shark-fishing began in Western Australia in 1941 with a single boat using demersal longlines in the Leschenault Inlet to catch, primarily, gummy sharks, Mustelus antarcticus. In the same year, other vessels began fishing in the inlet and adjacent offshore waters and by 1942, there were 6 shark-fishing boats operating around the south-western port of Bunbury. During the late 1940s and early 1950s the shark expanded to other ports including Albany, Fremantle and Geraldton and despite remaining a largely part time occupation for most fishers, shark-fishing effort increased steadily as more operators entered the fishery. Throughout the 1960s, the shark fishery gradually moved further offshore and demersally set multifilament gillnets gradually replaced longlines as the preferred fishing method. By 1965 the catch of shark had exceeded 300 tonnes yr-1 (Figure 1). Catches rose steadily throughout the late 1960s, until in the early 1970s, public concern over the level of mercury in shark flesh contributed to a dramatic decrease in demand for shark and catches declined sharply

Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 140, 2003 1 (Heald, 1987; Simpfendorfer and Donohue, 1998). Following research carried out by the Fisheries Department of Western Australia, the WA Health Department introduced regulations in 1974 prohibiting the sale of shark flesh with mercury concentrations in excess of 0.5 parts per million (Hancock and Edmonds, 1977) and consumer confidence gradually returned. As the markets for shark flesh began to recover and the introduction of new management regulations restricted access to other fisheries, effort in the shark fisheries began to rise dramatically.

2500 800

2000 Catch 600 hours) Effort

1500 gillnet

400 km ( 1000 effort ('000 kg live weight) live kg ('000 200 500 Catch Effective Effective 0 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year Figure 1. Historical shark catch and effort.

Throughout the 1980s, shark fishing became an increasingly full time occupation. Operators began using larger and faster vessels equipped with satellite navigation systems and colour echo-sounders, which enabled them to operate further offshore and in areas that had previously been out of range. New fishing gear technology, such as monofilament gillnets and powered net-reels, also significantly increased the amount of net that fishers were able to operate. By this time, the use of monofilament gillnet was widespread with longlines only being used by a handful of smaller operators. Fishing effort peaked in 1987 at 787,000 km gillnet hours (Figure 1), more than 4 times the effort in 1980. Annual demersal gillnet and longline effort values are also presented in Appendix I. Unregulated fishing effort, together with declining catch rates of key shark species, prompted the introduction of the first management plan for Western Australia’s shark fishery. Under an agreement between the State and Commonwealth governments the area between latitude 33°S (Cape Bouvard) and the South Australian border, (129°E, Figure 2) was declared as a limited entry fishery in 1988, with access restricted to fishers who could demonstrate a historical use of the stock. The fishery, known as the Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery (JASDGDLF), was divided into 2 zones: Zone 1 between 33° S and Chatham Island (116° 30’E) and Zone 2 from Chatham Island (116° 30’E) to the South Australian border (129°E). Effort was limited by the allocation of time/gear units, with each unit allowing the use of 600m of demersal gillnet or 200 longline hooks for one month. Following stock assessments for the 3 main target shark species (dusky sharks, Carcharhinus obscurus, gummy sharks, Mustelus antarcticus and whiskery sharks, Furgaleus macki) in the mid 1990’s, which indicated that stocks were either fully or over exploited, the amount of net (or number of hooks) allowed by each unit has gradually been reduced by 60% (McAuley and Lenanton, 2002).

2 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 3 Indian Ocean

Western Australia

Geraldton Southern Ocean 30° WCDGDLF Jurien Eucla Two Rocks

Fremantle Esperance Bunbury Augusta Albany 35° Zone 2 Zone 1

JASDGDLF 0 nm 100 nm 200 nm

110° 115° 120° 125°

Figure 2. WA demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries. JASDGDLF = Joint Authority Southern Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery; WCDGDLF = West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery.

The number of vessels authorised to use powered net-reels in the area north of 33°S was also restricted in 1988 to limit the exploitation of the target shark species outside the managed fishery. Additionally, a prohibition on the use of metal traces on longline and dropline gear in the area between Steep Point (26° 30’S) and a line drawn north from North West Cape (114° 06’E) was introduced in 1993 to prevent the capture of large sharks. Following the inception of the JASDGDLF however, the amount of shark fishing effort on the west coast increased throughout the late 1980s and early 1990s. An interim management plan for shark fishing between Cape Bouvard and Steep point was introduced in 1997, which established the West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fishery (WCDGDLF) with similar management arrangements as the JASDGDLF. In the 2001/2002 financial year, the combined annual value of the southern and west coast demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries was estimated at approximately $4.8 million (McAuley and Lenanton, 2002).

1.2 Description of the gear Because the majority of vessels in the fishery use demersal gillnets and as all research data were collected from demersal gillnet vessels, demersal longline configurations have not been described in the following description. Nets are constructed of nylon monofilament with a diameter of between 35 mm and 70 mm (line 35-line 70). Mesh is hung between a negatively buoyant ‘ground line’, which sinks the net to the seabed and a positively buoyant ‘head line’, which stands the net vertically off the bottom (Figure 3). The net is attached to the head and ground lines using a hanging ratio of 1.5 to 2 metres of net for every metre of line to ensure enough slack in the mesh for fish to be caught (‘gilled’). Permitted mesh sizes are

2 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 3 restricted to between 165 mm (6.5”) and 178 mm (7”) and nets may not exceed 20 meshes in depth (263 cm with a 7” mesh). Ballast is usually attached to each end of the net and often intermittently along it’s length to prevent dragging. Floats are attached at each end to assist with relocation and recovery. Intermediate surface float lines are usually attached to nets to reduce the amount of net that is susceptible to two double ‘bite-offs’, where both the head line and ground line are severed twice between float lines, which can result in sections of net being lost.

Figure 3. Typical demersal gillnet configuration.

Fishers generally set between 1 and 4 nets at any one time, depending on their unit allocation, vessel size, area of operation, expected catch rates, etc. Each net is typically between 1,000 m and 3,000 m long and each vessel’s nets may be set in close proximity to each other or separated by distances of several kilometres. Most vessels deploy their gear overnight (the mean observed ‘soak time’ for nets in these fisheries is 17 hours) but some operators deploy and recover their gear twice per day.

1.3 Objectives of this report This report provides a snapshot of the catch composition of the Southern and West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline fisheries over a five-year period between 1994 and 1999. Because fishery landings records do not include discarded bycatch and, in some cases, fishers do not report all catch to species level or are unable to identify less common species, research data collected during extensive at sea sampling provides the

4 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 5 best source of information with which to validate the catches of minor species and record of the bycatch in these fisheries. This information is particularly useful in undertaking Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) assessment of these fisheries, a requirement of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, 1999, to maintain their export approval. It is also intended that these data will provide fishery scientists and managers with a clearer understanding of all components of the catches by these fisheries and provide baseline data for future management arrangements. Data presented in this report were collected during two research projects which were part- funded by grants from the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation: FRDC projects 93/67, ‘Stock Assessment of Large Coastal and Demersal Sharks’ and 96/130 ‘Biology and Stock Assessment of Western Australia’s Commercially Important Shark Species’. The information in this report was not incorporated into the final FRDC project reports as it was largely outside the projects’ aims and objectives.

2.0 Methods

2.1 Data collection Data for this study have come from two sources: the Department of Fisheries’ (WA DOF) Catch and Effort Statistics System (CAESS) records of commercial fishers’ monthly returns, which are submitted as a condition of renewal of their licences, and from research conducted by Department of Fisheries Shark Research Section staff on board commercial gillnet fishing vessels during their regular fishing activities in the JASDGDLF and the WCDGDLF. No trips were undertaken on board the few vessels operating demersal longlines. Research data were collected between July 1994 and June 1999 on vessels operating from the ports of Geraldton, Jurien Bay, Two Rocks, Fremantle, Bunbury, Augusta, Albany, Esperance and Eucla (Figure 2). Research trips were conducted in March, April, May (Autumn), July (Winter), September, October and November (Spring). Where possible, each trip took place for one week either side of the full moon, depending on weather conditions, availability of vessels and other logistical constraints. Fishers took researchers to sea on a voluntary basis and consequently data were not collected from all vessels in these fisheries. During research trips, observers recorded the date, time, depth, latitude and longitude of all gillnet ‘sets’. Nets were set either once or twice each day, depending on the vessel, catches, weather conditions, etc. Catch was identified to the lowest possible taxa and measured as soon as practical after being removed from the net. Total lengths (TL) of scalefish (teleosts) were measured as a straight line from the tip of the snout to a line perpendicular with the tip of the upper lobe of the caudal fin, with it held in a ‘natural’ position (Figure 4). Fork lengths (FL) of sharks were measured as a straight line from the tip of the snout to the rear margin of the fork of the tail and total length was measured as a straight line from the tip of the snout to the tip of the caudal fin when it was held in a ‘natural position’ (Figure 4). For practical reasons, sharks of less than 140cm TL were measured using measuring boards fitted with fixed end plates and larger fish were measured on deck with tape measures. All lengths were recorded to the nearest centimetre. Whenever possible, sharks were also sexed.

4 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 5

Figure 4. Length measurements.

Discarded catch (i.e. damaged fish or species of no commercial value) was also identified and counted. Where available, size frequency data from gillnet mesh selectivity experiments (Simpfendorfer and Unsworth, 1998a), were used to calculate the weight of catches of discarded species. Only data from the 6.5 (16.5 cm) and 7 inch (17.8 cm) experimental net panels, which correspond to commercial mesh sizes, are included in this report.

2.2 Data analysis 2.2.1 Commercial data Catch and effort (CAESS) data from the JASDGDLF and WCDGDLF were subdivided into 6 regions: Region 1, between longitudes 124°E and 129°E; Region 2, between longitudes 119°E and 124°E; Region 3, between longitudes 116°E and 119°E; Region 4, between longitude 116°E and latitude 33°S; Region 5, between latitudes 33°S and 30°S and Region 6, between latitudes 30°S and 27°S (Figure 5). The mean annual reported catch of each species (or category) and effort from each region between July 1994 and June 1999 were calculated from these regional data.

Indian Ocean

Western Australia Region 6

Southern Ocean 30°

Region 5

Region 1

35° Region 4 Region 2 Region 3

0 nm 100 nm 200 nm

110° 115° 120° 125°

Figure 5. Regional boundaries.

6 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 7 Due to the wide variety of marine finfish fauna caught in Western Australia and because fishers can use multiple names to describe the same species, a small number of species were not recognised by the CAESS database. Unrecognised species, which could not be properly identified from the original fishing returns, were designated as ‘unspecified’. In Figures 6-13, all species or species, which comprised less than 1% or 100kg of the reported catch, were combined as ‘minor species’. The full species breakdown of the commercial catch is given in Appendix I. Demersal effort was converted to equivalent gillnet effort by using the original net-to-hook conversion specified by the management plan (ie. 600m gillnet:200 hooks) . The combined gillnet and longline effort is referred to as ‘gillnet equivalent’ effort in this report and all effort figures are expressed in units of kilometre gillnet hours, unless otherwise specified. Catch per unit effort (CPUE), was calculated by dividing the catch by the corresponding ‘gillnet equivalent’ effort. This report only considers records from the temperate demersal gillnet and longline fisheries (JASDGDLF and WCDGDLF) and data may not necessarily match those reported in WA DOF annual Status and Stock Assessment reports, which are inclusive of data from all licensed Western Australian fishing vessels.

2.2.2 Research data Research observer effort was calculated for each commercial gillnet ‘set’ observed between July 1994 and June 1999 by multiplying the recorded net length by ‘soak’ time (the difference between the set time and the haul time). For a small number of sets, where soak time was not available, the mean set time for that vessel in the same month was used. Also for a small number of sets, where net length was not recorded, the net length used by that vessel on either the previous day or next day was used. Effort is summarised regionally and expressed in units of km gillnet hours (km gn hr). In order to compare observer data with CAESS records, the research-observed catch was converted to weights of measured fish. Weights were calculated using fork length to total length relationships (Appendix II), derived from the WA DOF Shark Research Section’s database, and a combination of published and previously unpublished length-weight relationships, which were empirically measured during commercial and recreational sampling programs (Appendix III). All weights referred to in this report are whole weights, unless stated otherwise. Unmeasured fish were assigned the regional mean weight for their species and sex, with unsexed fish given the sex-combined mean regional weight. Where regional averages were not available (i.e. when sample sizes were too small) the total average weight for the species, across all regions, was used (Appendix IV). Because they were generally discarded and due to difficulties in handling them safely, stingrays (families Dasyatididae and Urolophidae) and eagle rays (family Myliobatididae) were not measured by observers. Average weights were therefore estimated from the authors’ personal observations. Other rarely encountered discard species, such as gurnards, gurnard perch, carpet sharks, boxfish, harlequin fish and north-west blowfish were usually unmeasured and their average weights were also estimated. No suitable length-weight relationship for dusky morwong was available at the time of writing. Therefore, the relationship for a related species, the banded morwong, Cheilodactylus spectabilis, was tried but was judged as giving too high an average value (12.89kg) so the average weight of dusky morwongs was adjusted to 9 kg.

6 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 7 As with commercial catch summaries, small components of the observed catch (i.e. those that were <1% of the regional catch or were <50kg) were combined as ‘minor species’. A full description of these catches is given in Appendix V. The following elasmobranch species were generally considered unsaleable and, therefore, discarded: Port Jackson sharks, Heterodontus portusjacksoni; eagle rays, family Myliobatididae; angel sharks, family Squatinidae; western , sp. A (Last and Stevens, 1994); cobbler wobbegongs, Sutorectus tentaculatus; saw sharks, family Pristiophoridae; shovelnose rays, families Rhinobatidae and Rhynchobatidae; stingrays and stingarees, families Dasyatididae and Urolophidae, carpet sharks, family Parascyllidae and broadnose sevengill sharks, cepedianus. Discarded teleosts were: buffalo bream, Kyphosus cornelii; dusky morwong, D. nigricans; red-lipped morwong, Cheilodactylus rubrolabiatus; north-west blowfish, Lagocephalus scleratus; gurnards, family ; gurnard perches, Neosebastes spp.; sea carp, family Aplodactylidae; boxfish, family Ostraciidae; scorpionfish, family Scorpaenidae and stargazers, family Uranoscopidae.

2.2.3 Catch estimation using research observed CPUE data In an attempt to validate the accuracy of commercial CAES reporting in the WA temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries and to estimate the fisheries’ level of discarded bycatch, observed catch rates were used to back-calculate commercial catches between 1994 and 1999. The overall (all regions) annual catch per unit effort (CPUE) was calculated for the 18 most commonly observed (by number) species of sharks and 14 species of scalefish. In regions where 5 years of observer data were available (regions 2-5), regional catch rates were also calculated for the 9 most common shark species and 4 of the most common scalefish. The ‘expected’ CPUE for each species was calculated by fitting a linear regression to the annual research observed data. By randomly sampling the variance from the expected CPUE regression, 500 ‘bootstrapped’ CPUE datasets were generated. The mean annual catch of each species and 95% confidence intervals were then estimated by multiplying the bootstrapped CPUE data by the annual commercially reported effort.

2.2.4 Non fish Bycatch Observer data sheets were examined for notes regarding the capture of non-fish bycatch and records were tabulated. To confirm that these records were complete, field staff were questioned about the possibility of unrecorded incidents. All confirmed that, with the possible exception of very occasional rock lobster and gastropod captures, all such captures were recorded.

8 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 9 3.0 Results 3.1 Effort Between 1994 and 1999, demersal was, by far, the preferred fishing method, accounting for more than 97% of total effort in the fisheries (Table 1). Vessels operating in Region 6 reported the highest proportion of longline effort, where it accounted for 11.8% of regional ‘gillnet equivalent’ effort. Mean annual fishing effort was greatest in region 5 (47,296 km gn.hr) and least in region 2 (30,364 km gn.hr). During the last year of the study however, region 4 reported the highest level of effort (50,470 km gn.hr) and region 3 the lowest (26,573 km gn.hr). Whilst the overall level of fishing effort decreased by 6.2% between 1994 and 1999, during the same period, effort increased in regions 1, 2, 4 and 6 (Appendix I). Effort also increased appreciably in region 5 between 1994 and 1998 before declining sharply in 1998/99. Only region 3 reported a steadily declining trend during this period. Research staff observed 7.4% of total fishery effort during the study period, all of which was on board gillnet vessels. Regionally, research coverage ranged between 1.8% (Region 2) and 19.8% (Region 4) of commercial effort.

Table 1. Southern and West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Longline Fishery effort and research ‘observed’ effort, July 1994 to June 1999.

Commercial Research gillnet effort longline effort ‘gillnet equivalent’ observed effort % of commercial Region (km gn hours) (‘000 hook hours) effort (km gn hours) (km gn hours) effort observed

1 155,046 3 155,055 3,984 2.6 2 151,616 68 151,819 2,792 1.8 3 168,138 1,273 171,957 7,614 4.4 4 223,430 266 224,229 44,404 19.8 5 229,784 2,233 236,482 19,975 8.4 6 148,460 5,863 166,048 3,121 1.9 All 1,076,473 9,706 1,105,590 81,890 7.4

3.2 Catch composition

3.2.1 Commercial elasmobranch catch Due to the magnitude of fluctuation in fishing effort and because species catches are confounded with vessels’ targeting behaviour, the following trends in landings should not necessarily be considered representative of changes in species’ abundance. The mean annual temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries’ catch of elasmobranchs was 1,298.6 tonnes. Total annual shark and ray catches declined by 151.1 tonnes (11.6%) between 1994 and 1999, corresponding to the 6.2% reduction in effort resulting from management adjustments to the fisheries’ unit allowances. The largest decrease in elasmobranch catch (105.6 tonnes) occurred in region 5, where effort dropped by 29.8% (Appendix I). Region 4 reported the largest mean annual regional catch of elasmobranchs (262.8 tonnes) and region 6, the smallest (142.4 tonnes). Annually, 72.7 tonnes (5.6 % of the total elasmobranch catch) of shark was either undescribed by fishers on their returns or unrecognised by CAESS. The group of sharks recorded as ‘bronze whaler’ (primarily dusky sharks, Carcharhinus obscurus), was the single largest component (28.8%) of the commercially reported

8 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 9 elasmobranch catch (Figure 6). Annual ‘bronze whaler’ catches showed a gradual decline from 425.6 tonnes in 1994/95 to 336.9 tonnes in 1998/99, with a mean annual catch of 374.2 tonnes. Gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus, was the second most important species with a mean annual catch of 282.1 tonnes (21.7%). Despite a dramatic decline in 1995/96, annual gummy shark catches increased from 271.1 tonnes in 1994/95 to 314.4 tonnes in 1998/99. Whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki, was the third largest component, with a mean annual catch of 198.8 tonnes (15.3%). Whiskery shark catches fell by 19% between 1994/95 and 1998/ 99. Sandbar (known locally as thickskin) shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, catches doubled between 1994/95 and 1998/99. On average, the annual sandbar shark catch was 120.2 tonnes (9.3%), making it the fourth largest component of the fisheries’ elasmobranch catch. Two species of sharks which were caught by the temperate WA demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries were protected under the Endangered Species Protection Act 19921 (ESP) during the course of this project, causing rapid declines in their reported catches. There was no reported catch of great white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, in 1998/99 (Appendix I), following their listing in December 1997. Smaller quantities of grey nurse sharks, Carcharias taurus, which were also listed under the ESP Act in December 1997, continued to be reported from State waters (outside of the jurisdiction of Commonwealth legislation) in 1998/99 until their protection under the State’s Wildlife Conservation Act in December 1999.

'Bronze whaler' Gummy 374.2t 282.1t (28.8%) (21.7%)

Unspecified 72.7t (5.6%) Whiskery Minor species 198.8t 10.6t (15.3%) (0.8%) Rays Sandbar 18.2t 120.2t (1.4%) (9.3%) 'Blacktip' 29.5t (2.3%) 43.5t (3.3%) Dogfish Hammerhead School 45.7t 53.1t 50.0t (3.5%) (4.1%) (3.9%)

Figure 6. All regions mean annual elasmobranch catch reported by demersal gillnet and demersal longline fishers, July 1994 to June 1999.

‘Bronze whaler’ was an important part of the fisheries’ catch in all six regions (Figure 7), accounting for between 9.3% (region 2) and 49.4% (region 4) of regional catches. F. macki, catches were also significant in all six regions, comprising between 7.3% (region 6) and 21.7% (region 4). M. antarcticus, were by far the largest component of the elasmobranch catch in regions 1 and 2 (49.7% and 58.1% respectively) and also an important portion of the catch in region 3 (24.1%). However, they were caught in only small quantities in the other three regions. Sandbar sharks, C. plumbeus, were caught in insignificant quantities in regions 1, 2, 3 and 4, however they were a major portion of the catch in region 5 (17.8%) and the primary component of the catch in region 6 (40.8%), although catches in region 6 only began ______1 The ESP Act was superceded by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act in 1999.

10 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 11 to exceed those of ‘bronze whaler’ in 1996/97 (Appendix I). Whilst small overall, catches of school shark, Galeorhinus galeus, (20.4% in region 1) and ‘dogfish’, family Squalidae, (11.2% in region 2 and 9.6% in region 3) were locally significant.

(i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2

Gummy 107.4t Gummy (49.7%) 108.1t (58.1%) Unspecified Unspecified 1.4t (0.7%) 1.7t (0.8%) Minor species Minor species 1.6t (0.8%) 2.5t (1.1%) Hammerhead School Dogfish 'Bronze 3.8t (2.1%) 44.2t 2.8t (1.3%) 'Bronze whaler' Whiskery whaler' School shark (20.4%) Hammerhead t 28.4t 17.4t 4.9t (2.6%) 24.0 7.0t (3.2%) Dogfish (15.2%) (9.3%) Whiskery (11.1%) 20.8. t 29.3t (11.2%) (13.5%)

(iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4

'Bronze whaler' 'Bronze whaler' 76.5t 129.9t Gummy (31.0%) (49.4%) 59.6t (24.1%) Unspecified 10.8t (4.4%) Whiskery Unspecified Minor species 57.0t 38.4t 2.2t (0.9%) Whiskery (21.7%) (14.6%) 33.3t 'Blacktip' 2.4t (1.0%) (13.5%) Dogfish Pencil 3.3t (1.3%) 23.7t Wobbegong (9.6%) 5.1t (2.1%) Minor species 4.7t (1.8%) Sandbar Skates & Rays 7.5t 7.4t (3.0%) Gummy 3.2t (1.2%) (3.0%) Hammerhead Hammerhead Wobbegong 6.8t (2.6%) 15.7t (6.3%) 12.4t Sandbar (4.7%) 10.8t (4.1%) (v) Region 5 (vi) Region 6

'Bronze whaler' Sandbar 82.0t 58.1t Sandbar (33.6%) (40.8%) 43.4t (17.8%)

Unspecified 2.4t (1.7%) Unspecified 'Bronze whaler' 18.0t (7.4%) 44.4t Minor species 2.3t (1.6%) Whiskery (31.2%) 40.4t Skates & Rays 1.6t (1.1%) (16.6%) Grey nurse 1.9t (1.3%) Minor species 4.2t (1.7%) Hammerhead 4.9t (3.5%) Gummy 2.9t (1.2%) Wobbegong 6.2t (4.4%) Skates & Rays 7.1t (2.9%) 'Blacktip' Whiskery 10.4t (7.3%) Wobbegong Hammerhead 14.7t 18.1t (7.4%) 14.9t (6.1%) (6.0%) 'Blacktip' 10.6t (7.5%)

Figure 7. Regional mean annual elasmobranch catches reported by demersal gillnet and demersal longline fishers, July 1994 to June 1999.

10 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 11 3.2.2 Commercial teleost catch Between 1994 and 1999, the annual teleost (scalefish) catch averaged 196.6 tonnes (13.1% of total landings). The proportion of scalefish in the fisheries’ total catch increased by 14.8%, from 183.3 tonnes (11.1%) in 1994/95, to 210.3 tonnes (13.3%) in 1998/99 (Appendix I). Unidentified scalefish accounted for 16.9% of all scalefish caught. Queen snapper, Nemadactylus valenciennesi, (24.9%) was the primary component of the scalefish catch in the two fisheries, with a mean annual catch of 48.9 tonnes. The next largest components were, blue groper, Achoerodus gouldii, (15.1%); West Australian dhufish, Glaucosoma hebraicum, (10.4%) and pink snapper, Pagrus auratus, (9.9%). Annual catches of queen snapper, blue groper and dhufish remained fairly steady over this five-year period (Appendix I). The annual pink snapper catch, however, nearly doubled from 13.8 tonnes in 1994/95 to 25.0 tonnes in 1998/99, with a minimum 9.8 tonnes in 1995/96. The highest proportion of ‘unidentified’ scalefish (15.0 tonnes yr-1) was reported from region 4, where it accounted for 33.5% of the regional catch (Figure 9).

Blue groper 29.7t (15.1%) Queen snapper 48.9t Dhufish (24.9%) 20.5t (10.4%)

Pink snapper 19.4t Unspecified (9.9%) 33.2t (16.9%)

Samsonfish 11.8t (6.0%) Mulloway 6.1t (3.1%) Minor species 7.0t (3.6%) Leatherjacket 1.9t (1.0%) Redfish 5.4t (2.7%) Emperor sweetlip 2.2t (1.1%) Boarfish 4.8t (2.4%) Sweetlip 2.5t (1.3%) Baldchin groper 3.1t (1.6%)

Figure 8. All regions mean annual teleost catch reported by demersal gillnet and demersal longline fishers, July 1994 to June 1999.

12 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 13 (i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2

Queen snapper Blue groper Queen snapper 9.5t 2.0t 3.9t (48.1%) (16.3%) (31.7%)

Mulloway Unspecified Unspecified 1.6t 1.4t Blue groper 1.5t (7.7%) (12.9%) 11.6% 4.4t (22.5%) Redfish Pink 1.6t Minor species 0.4t (2.2%) (12.7%) snapper 1.0t Hapuku 0.4t (1.9%) (8.2%) Minor species 0.1t (1.8%) Pink snapper 0.4t (2.0%) Redfish Deepsea trevalla 0.4t (2.1%) Boarfish 1.4t (7.1%) Boarfish 0.6t (5.0%) 1.2t (6.3%) (iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4

Queen snapper Unspecified 17.1t 15.0t (39.4%) (33.5%) Queen snapper 9.3t (20.8%) Blue groper Minor species 9.7t Unspecified 0.7t (1.6%) (22.4%) 3.0t (7.0%) Redfish 0.4t (1.0%) Mulloway 0.5t (1.0%) Blue groper Pink Pink snapper 8.4t snapper Dhufish 2.1t (4.7%) (18.7%) 4.5t Minor species 6.2t (10.3%) 1.9t (7.0%) (13.8%) Samsonfish Leatherjacket 2.2t (4.9%) 0.8t (1.7%) Dhufish 0.9t (2.1%) Boarfish Redfish Samsonfish 1.2t (2.9%) 2.4t (5.6%) 1.9t (4.3%) (v) Region 5 (vi) Region 6

Dhufish 8.3t Dhufish (17.2%) 5.1t Samsonfish (18.3%) Pink snapper 5.0t Queen snapper 7.0t (10.3%) 8.8t (25.1%) (18.1%) Blue groper Samsonfish 3.2t (11.4%) 4.8t Unspecified (9.8%) 2.1t (7.7%) Unspecified Sweetlip Pink snapper 10.1t (20.7%) 2.4t 4.5t (8.8%) (9.2%) Minor species 1.2t (4.5%) 0.3t (1.0%) Queen snapper 0.3t (1.1%)

Mulloway Parrotfish 0.3t (1.2%) Sweetlip emperor 2.2t (8.0%) 2.4t (5.1%) Minor species 2.0t (4.1%) Blue groper 0.4t (1.4%) Baldchin groper 1.8t (3.7%) Leatherjacket 0.9t (1.8%) Mulloway 1.4t (5.1%) Spangled emperor 0.5t (1.8%) Baldchin groper 1.3t (4.5%)

Figure 9. Regional mean annual teleost catches reported by demersal gillnet and demersal longline fishers, July 1994 to June 1999.

Region 5 reported the largest scalefish catch (mean of 48.4 tonnes yr-1) and region 1, the smallest (mean of 12.4 tonnes yr-1). Queen snapper, N. valenciennesi, was the principal component of the scalefish catch in regions 1 (31.7%), 2 (48.1 %) and 3 (39.4%) but accounted for only 20.8% and 18.1% and 1.1% of the scalefish catch in regions 4, 5 and

12 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 13 6 respectively. Blue groper, A. gouldii, was the next most significant scalefish species in regions 1 (16.3%), 2 (22.5%), 3 (22.4%) and 4 (18.7%). Blue groper was also a valuable part of the scalefish catch in region 5 (9.8%) but was also only caught in very small quantities in region 6 (1.4 %). Pink snapper, P. auratus, was the principal scalefish species in region 6, where fishers landed an average of 7.0 tonnes yr-1 (25.1%) and was also important in region 3 (10.3%) and region 5 (9.2%). Other regionally important species were mulloway, Argyrosomus hololepidotus, and ‘redfish’ (Centroberyx spp.), in region 1 (12.9% and 12.7% respectively); samsonfish, Seriola hippos, in regions 5 and 6 (10.3% and 11.4% respectively) and emperor sweetlip, Lethrinus miniatus, (8.0%) in region 6.

3.2.3 Research observed elasmobranch catch The three main components of the observed elasmobranch catch were Carcharhinus obscurus, (28.9%), Mustelus antarcticus (15.4%) and Furgaleus macki (11.6%) (Figure 10). In total, 11 species were generally discarded (Appendix V), estimated to be 13.7% by weight of the observed catch. The majority of discarded bycatch was the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, which accounted for 10.3% of the total elasmobranch catch.

Gummy Dusky 11.5t 21.7t (15.4%) (28.9%)

Whiskery 8.7t (11.6%) Minor species *Port Jackson 3.5t (4.7%) 7.8t Wobbegong (western) (10.3%) 0.8t (1.1%) Tiger 0.8t (1.1%) Wobbegong (banded) 1.0t (1.3%) *Eagle ray 1.3t (1.7%) Smooth hammerhead Spinner 5.6t (7.4%) Copper 1.6t (2.1%) School 2.7t Wobbegong (unspecified) Sandbar 4.3t (3.6%) 1.7t (2.2%) 4.7t (6.2%) (5.7%)

Figure 10. All regions research observed mean annual elasmobranch catch, July 1994 to June 1999. Shaded species indicate discarded catch.

Figure 11 summarises the regional elasmobranch catches observed by research staff. School shark, Galeorhinus galeus, was the most commonly observed species in region 1 (31.6%), M. antarcticus, was the most common in regions 2 (57.8%) and 3 (38.3%), C. obscurus, was the most common in regions 4 (37.7%), 5 (22.4%) and sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, was the most common in region 6 (41.6%). C. obscurus was also caught in significant quantities in regions 2, 3 and 6 (11.8%, 25.6% and 20.2%, respectively). Furgaleus macki, was also significant in regions 2-5, comprising between 8.1% (region 3) and 14.3% (region 4) of the catch. Sandbar sharks were also responsible for 19.4% of the catch in region 5, 7.5% in region 4 and 10.7% in region 3 but were not reported at all in regions 1 and 2.

14 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 15 (i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2

School 4.7t (31.6%) Gummy 4.3t (57.8%)

Gummy 4.5t (30.1%) Minor species 0.5t (3.1%) Minor species 0.3t (3.7%) *White Pencil 0.2t (1.6%) Dusky 0.1t (1.4%) Dusky Copper 0.9t Copper 1.2t 0.4t (2.4%) (11.8%) (8.3%) 0.2t (3.1%) *Eagle ray *Eagle ray 0.4t (2.7%) 0.2t (3.3%) Whiskery 0.9t (5.8%) *Port Jackson 0.2t (3.3%) Smooth hammerhead *Port Jackson Smooth hammerhead 1.0t (6.4%) Whiskery 1.2t (7.9%) 0.4t (6.1%) 0.7t (9.7%) (iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4

Gummy 4.1t Dusky (38.3%) 12.6t (37.7%) Whiskery 4.8t Dusky (14.3%) 2.7t Minor species (25.6%) Minor species 0.4t (3.8%) *Port Jackson 1.7t (5.0%) *Eagle ray 4.7t *Eagle ray 0.1t (1.1%) (14.1%) 0.4t (1.2%) Sandbar *Port Jackson Wobbegong 1.2t 0.3t (2.9%) (western) (10.7%) Spinner Copper 0.5t(1.4%) 0.4t (3.5%) 0.6t Wobbegong Smooth hammerhead (1.9%) (banded) Whiskery 0.9t (8.1%) 0.7t (6.1%) Sandbar 2.5t (7.5%) 0.5t (1.6%) Smooth hammerhead Gummy Spinner Wobbegong 2.5t (7.5%) 1.2t (3.5%) 0.8t (unspec.) (2.5%) 0.7t (2.1%) (v) Region 5 (vi) Region 6

Sandbar 3.4t (19.4%) Dusky Sandbar 3.9t 3.4t (41.6%) (22.4%) *Port Jackson 1.9t (11.0%) Dusky 1.7t (20.2%) Minor species 0.3t (3.2%) Minor species Whiskery 0.6t (3.6%) Copper 0.1t (1.0%) 1.8t *Angel 0.3t (1.6%) Hammerhead (10.0%) Tiger (scalloped) 0.1t (1.3%) Wobbegong 0.7t *Port Jackson (western) 0.3t (1.6%) (8.7%) Wobbegong 0.1t (1.3%) (banded) 0.4t (2.1%) Gummy 0.1t *Eagle ray Spinner (1.3%) 0.4t Tiger 0.2 Wobbegong (2.1%) 0.4t Whiskery Spinner 1.3t (7.3%) Hammerhead Hammerhead (2.9%) (unspec.) Shortfin mako (2.1%) 0.5t (unspec.) (smooth) 0.2kg Smooth hammerhead 0.5t (3.1%) (5.6%) (2.7%) 1.2t (6.9%) 0.7t (8.4%) 0.7t (7.9%) Wobbegong (unspec.) Copper 0.7t (4.2%) 0.4t (2.5%)

Figure 11. Regional research observed mean annual elasmobranch catches, July 1994 to June 1999. Shaded species indicate discarded catch.

14 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 15 Region 4 had the highest overall incidence of discarded elasmobranch bycatch (17.6%), followed by region 5 (15.7%) and region 1 (13.5%). Region 3 had the lowest recorded quantity of elasmobranch bycatch (0.05%). Port Jackson sharks were the most frequently observed discarded species in all regions, estimated to account for between 1.3% (region 6) and 14.1% (region 4) of regional catches. Eagle rays, were the next most common group but only accounted for 1.7% of the total elasmobranch catch and between 0.1% (region 6) and 3.3% (region 2) regionally.

3.2.4 Research observed teleost catch The observed teleost catch is summarised in Figure 12. The most important commercially- valuable teleost species were G. hebraicum, at 16.3% of the catch, followed by N. valenciennesi, (10.5%), A. gouldii, (10.0%) and P. auratus (4.8%). Only 10 of the 46 observed species of scalefish were discarded, however these amounted to 32.1% of the estimated weight of the catch. Two species were responsible for almost all of the discarded teleost bycatch; buffalo bream, Kyphosus cornelii and dusky morwong, Dactylophora nigricans, which accounted for 19.6% and 12.4% of the weight of the catch, respectively.

Dhufish 2.3t (16.3%) Dusky Buffalo bream morwong 2.8t 1.8t (12.4%) (19.6%)

Queen snapper 1.5t (10.5%) Minor species 0.8t (5.8%) Blue groper Baldchin groper 1.4t 0.2t (1.5%) (10.0%) Yellow tailed kingfish 0.3t (2.0%) 0.3t (2.0%) Mulloway Redfish 0.4tkg Leatherjacket Pink snapper 0.4t (3.2%) (2.6%) 0.3t (2.4%) 0.7t (4.8%) Samsonfish Boarfish 0.5t (3.7%) 0.4t (3.1%)

Figure 12. All regions research observed mean annual teleost catch, July 1994 to June 1999. Shaded species indicate discarded catch.

Region 1 had the highest overall incidence of discarded teleosts (73.4% of the catch by weight), followed by region 6 (37.5%); region 5 (34.6%); region 4 (31.6%) and region 2 (23.4%). Region 3 had the lowest occurrence (10.8%). The only regions where a discarded species was not the predominant component of the scalefish catch were regions 3, where N. valenciennesi, accounted for 34.7% of the catch and region 5, where G. hebraicum made up 22.5% of the catch (Figure 13). K. cornelii was the dominant scalefish species in region 1 (63.2%), region 4 (18.1%) and region 6 (36.6%), whilst D. nigricans was the major scalefish species in region 2 (20.7%).

16 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 17 (i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2

Queen snapper 0.2t *Buffalo Bream (20.4%) 0.7t (63.2%) *Dusky morwong 0.2t (20.7%) Pink snapper 0.1t (15.2%) Minor species Minor species 0.1t (12.6%) 0.1(12.0%) Blue groper *Dusky 0.1t Blue Morwong (11.3%) Redfish 0.1t Groper Boarfish 0.1t (12.1%) 0.1t 0.1t (8.6%) (10.4%) (11.0%)

Boarfish 0.1t (4.8%)

(iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4

Dhufish 1.5t (18.0%) Queen snapper 0.3t *Buffalo bream (34.7%) *Dusky morwong 1.5t Blue groper 1.1t (13.4%) (18.1%) 0.2t (22.7%) Minor species Blue groper 0.3t (3.2%) Minor species 0.9t Knifejaw 0.1t (1.3%) 0.2t (23.3%) (11.1%) Yellow tailed Mulloway kingfish 0.1t 0.2t (2.1%) (1.7%) Boarfish Boarfish 0.1t Mackerel 0.2t (6.9%) 0.3t (3.3%) Queen snapper (3.0%) Pink snapper 0.8t (9.4%) Leatherjacket Samsonfish 0.3t 0.1t *Buffalo bream Pink snapper 0.3t (3.4%) (6.8%) 0.1t 0.3t (4.0%) Redfish (6.3%) (4.3%) 0.3t (3.7%)

(v) Region 5 (vi) Region 6

*Buffalo bream *Buffalo bream 0.7t Dhufish 0.4t (22.2%) (36.6%) 0.7t Dhufish (22.5%) 0.2t (16.1%) *Dusky morwong 0.4t (12.2%) Minor species 0.2t (7.4%) Minor species Sand snapper 0.1t (13.6%) 0.1t (12.3%) Pink Pink snapper 0.1t (2.8%) snapper 0.1t Queen snapper Samsonfish (8.5%) 0.2t (6.5%) 0.1t (2.9%)

Yellowfin tuna Yellow tailed kingfish Parrotfish 0.2t 0.1t 0.1t (5.4%) (5.5%) Samsonfish Baldchin groper (3.8%) 0.1t (7.6%) Blue groper 0.2t 0.2t Mulloway (4.7%) 0.2t (5.3%) (4.6%)

Figure 13. Regional research observed mean annual scalefish catches, July 1994 to June 1999. Shaded species indicate discarded catch.

16 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 17 3.2.5 Species diversity In total, 16 elasmobranch species2 were reported by gillnet and longline fishers in their monthly catch returns between 1994 and 1999 (Table 2). The highest commercially reported diversity occurred in regions 3 and 5, where 14 individual species were recorded. Fishers in regions 4 and 6 reported catching 12 species; Region 2 fishers reported 11 and Region 1 fishers reported 10. Observers recorded a total of 34 elasmobranch categories, 23 of which were identified to individual species (Appendix IV). The greatest observed elasmobranch diversity occurred in region 4 (28 species), followed by region 5, with 25 and region 3, with 24. The lowest elasmobranch diversity (18 species) was observed in region 1, however this was also where the least amount of research coverage occurred. Fishers in regions 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 reported between 55% and 60% of the elasmobranchs diversity recorded by observers. However, less than 43% of the observed diversity was reported in Region 4, which also reported, by far, the largest proportion of unidentified shark (14.6%).

Table 2. Regional species diversity.

Elasmobranchs Teleosts

% of % of observed observed # spp. # spp. diversity unspecified unspecified # spp. # spp. diversity unspecified unspecified Region CAESS observed reported (kg) (%) CAESS observed reported (kg) (%) 1 10 18 55.6 1,733 0.8 13 13 100.0 1,437 11.6 2 11 20 55.0 1,361 0.7 19 24 79.2 1,518 7.7 3 14 24 58.3 10,829 4.4 25 26 96.2 3,027 7.0 4 12 28 42.9 38,357 14.6 18 37 48.6 15,042 33.5 5 14 25 56.0 17,986 7.4 31 40 77.5 10,051 20.7 6 12 20 60.0 2,395 1.7 29 17 170.6 2,139 7.7 All 16 34 47.1 72,660 5.6 43 44 97.7 33,214 16.9

Demersal gillnet and longline fishers reported a total of 43 teleost species between 1994 and 1999. Highest diversity was reported in Region 5 (31 species), followed by Region 6 (29 species), the lowest diversity was reported in region 1 (13 species). Research staff also observed the highest teleost diversity in region 5 (40 species) and lowest in region 1 (13 species). The reported level of teleost diversity in region 1 was the same as the observed level of diversity (although different species); very similar in region 3 and similar in regions 2 and 5. Fishers in Region 4, however reported far fewer teleost species than were observed (48.6% agreement) and also, the highest proportion of unidentified catch. Only fishers in region 6 reported catching more species than were recorded by observers.

3.3 Catch per unit effort (CPUE) The total (all regions) catch per unit effort of the 18 elasmobranch and 14 scalefish species for which there were five-year datasets are illustrated in Figure 14 and Figure 15, respectively. Regional CPUE data were calculated for species where 5 years of catch and effort data were available. As research sampling was only conducted between 1994 and 1996 in region 1 and between 1994 and 1997 in region 6, no CPUE data were available for these regions and they were excluded. The remaining CPUE data, were used to generate bootstrapped estimated catches.

______2 In some cases, species were reported at a group level (eg. ‘blacktip’, ‘hammerhead’, ‘rays’, etc)

18 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 19 (i) Carcharhinus obscurus (ii) Mustelus antarcticus (iii) Heterodontus portusjacksoni

2 2 3 y = 0.0168x + 0.7659 1.5 2 UE 1.5 1 CP 1 0.5 y = -0.0543x + 1.7216 y = -0.1657x + 2.54 1 0 0

(iv) Furgaleus macki (v) Family Sphyrnidae (vi) Family Orectolobidae 1.5 1 0.4 0.3 1 UE 0.5 0.2

CP 0.5 0.1 y = -0.0062x + 0.3143 y = -0.0182x + 0.6938 y = 0.0478x + 0.2644 0 0 0

(vii) Family Myliobatididae (viii) Carcharhius brevipinna (ix) Carcharhinus plumbeus

1.5 y = -0.2948x + 1.5867 0.4 y = 0.0444x 1.5 y = -0.0632x + 0.5641 0.3 + 0.0198 1 1 UE 0.2

CP 0.5 0.5 0.1 0 0 0

(x) Carcharhinus brachyurus (xi) Isurus oxyrhinchus (xii) Family Squatinidae 0.3 0.15 0.08 y = 0.0089x + 0.0193 y = 0.0279x - 0.0327 y = 0.0263x 0.06 0.2 + 0.0386 0.1 UE 0.04

CP 0.1 0.05 0.02

0.0 0 0

(xiii) Hypogaleus hyugaensis (xiv) Galeocerdo cuvier (xv) Carcharias taurus

0.06 0.06 y = -0.0034x + 0.0332 0.03 y = -0.0009x + 0.0175 y = 0.005x + 0.0159 0.04 0.04 0.02

UE

CP 0.02 0.02 0.01

0 0 0

(xvi) Family Pristiophoridae (xvii) Family Dasyatididae (xviii) Families Rhinobatidae

0.04 & Rhynchobatidae y = -0.0124x + 0.0612 y = 0.0047x - 0.0007 0.03 y = -0.0048x + 0.0228 UE 0.02

CP 0.01 0 94- 95- 96- 97- 98- 94- 95- 96- 97- 98- 94- 95- 96- 97- 98- 95 96 97 98 99 95 96 97 98 99 95 96 97 98 99 YEAR YEAR YEAR

Figure 14. Research observed and commercially reported CPUE (kg/km gillnet hr) of 18 species of elasmobranchs

18 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 19

(i) Kyphosus cornelii (ii) Glaucosoma hebraicum (iii) Dactylophora nigricans

2 y = -0.1275x 0.3 y = 0.0032x + 0.1562 0.8 + 1.2389 E 1.5 0.6 0.2 1 0.4 CPU 0.1 0.5 0.2 y = -0.0326x + 0.574 0 0 0

(iv) Nemadactylus valenciennesi (v) Achoerodus gouldii (vi) Pagrus auratus 0.3 0.2 0.15 y = 0.0174x - 0.0016 0.15 E 0.2 0.1 0.1

CPU 0.1 0.05 0.05 y = 0.0029x + 0.0981 y = 0.0023x + 0.0956 0 0 0

(vii) Seriola hippos (viii) Centroberyx spp. (ix) Family Pentacerotidae

0.1 y = 0.0044x + 0.0232 0.08 y = 0.0148x - 0.0092 0.1 y = 0.0114x - 0.0011

E 0.06

0.05 0.04 0.05

CPU 0.02 0 0 0

(x) Family Monacanthidae (xi) Choerodon rubescens (xii) Oplegnathus woodwardi

0.04 y = 0.0032x + 0.0145 0.03 0.03

E 0.03 y = 0.0037x - 0.0021 0.02 0.02 0.02 CPU 0.01 0.01 0.01 y = 5E-05x + 0.0146 0 0 0

94- 95- 96- 97- 98- (xiii) Tilodon sexfasciatum (xiv) truttaceus 95 96 97 98 99 0.02 0.015 y = -0.0019x + 0.0107 y = -0.0023x + 0.0122 YEAR

E 0.015 0.01 0.01 CPU 0.005 0.005

0 0 94- 95- 96- 97- 98- 94- 95- 96- 97- 98- 95 96 97 98 99 95 96 97 98 99

YEAR YEAR

Figure 15. Research observed and commercially reported CPUE (kg/km gillnet hr) of 18 species of elasmobranchs

20 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 21 3.4 Estimated commercial catch 3.4.1 Elasmobranchs The best estimate of the total (i.e. all regions) mean annual elasmobranch catch from bootstrapped CPUE data was 1186.6 tonnes (Table 3), 112.0 tonnes less than was reported by the fishery (Table 4). The upper 95% confidence interval also underestimated the total catch by 28.5 tonnes.

Table 3. Annual mean estimated commercial elasmobranch catches from ‘bootstrapped’ observer CPUE data. Estimated mean annual catch (tonnes) and 95% CIs in parentheses Name Species Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Total 28.7 115.8 82.3 45.2 295.2 Dusky Carcharhinus obscurus (1.2-71.0) (25.3-201.5) (56.3-103.2) (24.6-62.0) (61.7-347.8) 101.3 159.1 7.9 1.8 180.4 Gummy Mustelus antarcticus (56.0-186.0) (66.0-336.7) (4.9-10.5) (0.2-6.0) (79.6-235.1) Heterodontus 47.5 74.2 148.8 120.8 122.2 Port Jackson* portusjacksoni (11.2-77.5) (48.0-124.0) (108.5-200.2) (70.7-176.5) (48.9-246.8) 18.7 34.9 33.5 23.5 120.3 Whiskery Furgaleus macki (9.1-24.0) (3.8-60.7) (18.9-53.6) (8.4-38.9) (25.3-177.4) 15.1 25.2 15.4 15.5 88.6 Hammerheads Sphyrnidae (5.3-38.8) (9.2-35.3) (5.8-28.3) (10.0-23.0) (52.3-132.5) 3.0 34.0 24.0 65.4 Wobbegongs Orectolobidae n/a (0.4-6.2) (20.8-48.8) (3.2-49.2) (57.9-72.9) 55.0 24.5 12.2 19.8 49.9 Eagle Rays* Myliobatididae (21.3-113.2) (3.5-82.5) (5.6-27.5) (11.3-29.6) (5.4-141.1) Longnose 5.4 6.1 44.9 Carcharhinus brevipinna n/a n/a grey/Spinner (2.2-10.2) (0.9-11.8) (19.8-111.2) 20.9 8.3 21.3 41.6 Sandbar Carcharhinus plumbeus n/a (2.4-59.3) (0.2-16.0) (14.2-31.5) (16.7-58.2) 26.0 Copper Carcharhinus brachyurus n/a n/a n/a n/a (14.2-44.9) 11.6 SF Mako Isurus oxyrinchus n/a n/a n/a n/a (4.5-16.4) 10.1 Angel sharks* Squatinidae n/a n/a n/a n/a (6.6-13.3) 6.8 Pencil Hypogaleus galeus n/a n/a n/a n/a (4.8-9.2) 5.1 Tiger Galeocerdo cuvier n/a n/a n/a n/a (2.4-9.8) 3.1 Grey Nurse Carcharias taurus n/a n/a n/a n/a (0.6-5.8) 3.0 * Pristiophoridae n/a n/a n/a n/a (0.5-5.8) Dasyatididae & 2.6 Sting Rays* n/a n/a n/a n/a Urolophidae (0.9-6.5) Shovelnose Rhinobatidae & 1.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a Rays* Rhynchobatidae (0.8-3.8)

101.2 408.3 218.5 227.4 1186.6 All sharks and rays (56.0-186.0) (300.6-523.1) (205.7-230.1) (200.4-259.4) (1,068.1-1,270.1)

Catches of the three main target species, C. obscurus, M. antarcticus, F. macki were also underestimated by 79.0 tonnes (21.1%), 101.7 tonnes (36.1%) and 76.6 tonnes (38.5%), respectively. Commercial catches of C. obscurus, M. antarcticus, F. macki were also greater than the upper 95% confidence limits of the estimated catches by, 26.4 tonnes, 47.0 tonnes and 21.4 tonnes, respectively. Estimated catches of ‘secondary’ species were generally higher than reported catches. The best estimates of catches of hammerheads (mainly Sphyrna

20 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 21 zygaena), wobbegongs (Orectolobidae) and ‘blacktip’ sharks (Carcharhinus brevipinna) were, respectively, 35.5 tonnes (66.9%), 21.9 tonnes (50.5%) and 15.4 tonnes (52.2%) higher than commercially reported. Suitable five-year datasets were not available for school shark, C. galeus or dogfish (Squalidae). The mean annual catches of H. portusjacksoni, which were commercially unmarketable and discarded and eagle rays, which were only retained to a very minor extent, were estimated to be 122.2 tonnes and 49.9 tonnes, respectively. Discarded bycatch of Port Jackson sharks was estimated to be highest in regions 4 and 5, at 148.8 tonnes and 120.8 tonnes respectively. At 54.9 tonnes, eagle ray bycatch was estimated to be highest in region 2.

Table 4. Differences between estimated and recorded elasmobranch catches.

Estimated catch above/below reported catch (tonnes live wt.) Name Species Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 All regions

Dusky Carcharhinus obscurus 11.3 39.3 -47.6 -36.9 -79.0 Gummy Mustelus antarcticus -6.8 99.4 4.6 -101.7 Whiskery Furgaleus macki -9.6 1.6 -23.4 -16.9 -78.5 Sandbar Carcharhinus plumbeus 13.4 -2.5 -22.2 -78.6 Hammerhead Family Sphyrnidae 11.2 9.5 8.6 0.7 35.5 Wobbegong Family Orectolobidae -2.1 21.6 5.9 22.0 Longnose Carcharhinus brevipinna 3.5 -8.6 15.4 grey/Spinner Skates and 54.9† 17.1† 10.4† 12.7† 36.2† Rays* Pencil Hypogaleus hyugaensis 1.9 Grey Nurse Carcharias taurus -1.2 Tiger Galeocerdo cuvier 4.6 Copper Carcharhinus brachyurus 25.6 SF Mako Isurus oxyrinchus 11.6 * Family Pristiophoridae 3.0 Port Jackson* Heterodontus portusjacksoni 47.5 74.2 148.8 120.8 122.2 Angel shark* Family Squatinidae 10.1

* Discarded; † Eagle rays (family Myliobatididae) only.

3.4.2 Teleosts The estimated total teleost catch was 223.6 tonnes (Table 5), 27.0 tonnes (13.7%) more than reported (Table 6). K. cornelii, which was always discarded, was estimated to be the largest component of the teleost catch, with a mean annual catch of 44.1 tonnes. G. hebraicum, which was generally retained, was estimated to be the second largest scalefish component at 36.9t (16.4t more than reported) followed by D. nigricans, another discarded species at 29.6 tonnes. At 23.6 tonnes and 22.6 tonnes, respectively, N. valenciennesi and A. gouldii were underestimated overall and in all regions for which there were bootstrapped data. P. auratus and S. hippos were also slightly underestimated while all other species were overestimated. Bootstrapping results indicated that the highest level of discarded teleost bycatch occurred in region 5, where 60.4 tonnes of buffalo bream and 23.4 tonnes of dusky morwong were estimated to have been caught, followed by region 4, where catches were estimated at 46.3 tonnes and 34.2 tonnes respectively.

22 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 23 Table 5. Estimated commercial teleost catches from ‘bootstrapped’ observer CPUE data. Estimated mean annual catch (tonnes) and 95% CIs in parentheses Name Species Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Total 4.7 13.1 46.3 60.4 44.1 Buffalo Bream* Kyphosus cornelii (0.8-10.2) (5.0-20.3) (13.9-81.5) (11.6-115.1) (10.0-98.2) 36.9 Dhufish Glaucosoma hebraicum (21.8-50.4) 30.6 10.0 34.2 23.4 29.6 Dusky Morwong* Dactylophora nigricans (0.0-48.4) (4.8-15.6) (20.7-43.1) (21.1-25.0) (16.6-52.7) Nemadactylus 4.5 12.3 5.0 2.7 23.6 Queen Snapper valenciennesi (1.9-7.6) (3.5-18.9) (2.6-5.9) (1.5-3.4) (17.5-28.9) 2.7 8.4 6.0 2.5 22.6 Blue Groper Achoerodus gouldii (1.7-4.1) (5.0-15.1) (4.4-7.8) (1.0-3.5) (19.0-26.2) 11.3 Pink Snapper Pagrus auratus (5.0-17.4) 8.1 Samsonfish Seriola hippos (1.8-13.8) 7.8 Red Snapper Centroberyx spp. (4.5-11.1) 7.2 Boarfish Family Pentacerotidae (3.8-12.0) 5.3 Leatherjacket Family Monacanthidae (3.3-6.8) 3.3 Baldchin Groper Choerodon rubescens (2.2-4.7) 2.0 Knifejaw Oplegnathus woodwardi (1.4-2.7) 1.2 Moonlighter Tilodon sexfasciatum (0.3-2.4) 1.1 Aus. Arripis truttaceus (0.2-2.0) 20.6 34.8 51.8 45.5 223.6 All Scalefish (8.3-34.8) (19.6-45.5) (30.1-62.8) (25.7-63.6) (156.3-285.2) * Discarded

Table 6. Differences between estimated and reported teleost catches.

Estimated catch above/below reported catch (tonnes live wt.) Species Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 All regions Buffalo Bream 4.7 13.1 46.3 60.4 44 Dusky Morwong 30.5 9.8 34.2 23.4 29.4 Queen Snapper -5 -4.8 -4.4 -6.1 -25.3 Dhufish 16.4 Pink Snapper -8.2 Blue Groper -1.7 -1.4 -2.4 -2.3 -7.1 Samsonfish -3.7 Leatherjacket 3.4 Red Snapper 2.4 Boarfish 2.4 Knifejaw 1.7 Moonlighter 1.2 Aus. Salmon 1.0 Baldchin Groper 0.2 * Discarded

22 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 23 3.5 Shark catch size composition Statistical summaries of the data presented in Figures 16–24 are given in Appendix IV.

3.5.1 Whaler sharks (family Carcharhinidae) (i) , Carcharhinus brachyurus (ii) , Carcharhinus brevipinna

10 10 Male (n=76) Male (n=771)

5 5 )

0 0 Frequency (% Frequency 5 5 Female (n=40) Female (n=691)

10 10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(iii) Dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus (iv) Sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus 20 10 Male (n=8455) 15 Male (n=1898) 10 5

%) 5 (

0 0

5 Frequency 10 5 Female (n=8740) Female (n=1991) 15

20 10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(v) , Galeocerdo cuvier 10

5 Male (n=17)

(%) 0 y y nc

5 Freque

10 Female (n=38)

15 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Fork Length (cm)

Figure 16. Whaler shark, family Carcharhinidae, size distribution (all zones).

24 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 25 (i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2 15 15

10 Male (n=162) 10 Male (n=56) 5 (%) 5 y y

nc 0 0 5 Freque Female (n=143) 5 10 Female (n=48)

15 10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4 15 20

15 10 Male (n=5442) Male (n=1009) 10 ) 5

(% 5 y y 0 0

5 5 Frequenc Female (n=5458) Female (n=995) 10 10 15

15 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(v) Region 5 (vi) Region 6

20 15

15 10 Male (n=300) 10 Male (n=1482) ) 5

(% 5 y y

nc 0 0

5 5 Freque Female (n=366) 10 Female (n=1730) 10 15

20 15 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

Figure 17. Regional dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, size distribution.

The gillnet catch of carcharhinid species was generally restricted to smaller sharks, under 120cm fork length (Figure 16). Larger proportions of intermediate-sized and large individuals were observed in the catches of the copper shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus, ( of males=155cm, standard deviation=50cm; of females=140cm, standard deviation=7cm) and the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, ( of males=125cm, standard deviation=34cm; of females=139cm, standard deviation=32cm). However, it should be noted that relatively small numbers of both of these species were caught. The catch of C. obscurus was highly

24 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 25 skewed to the smaller size-classes ( of males=82cm, standard deviation=14cm; of females=82cm, standard deviation=15cm), with 91% of observed dusky sharks measuring less than 100cm FL. The average size of C. obscurus (Appendix IV) was slightly higher on the south coast (regions 1, 2 and 3) and in the north west of the fishery (region 6) than in the south-west and lower west coast (regions 4 and 5, respectively). Similarly, the proportion of sharks longer than 100cm FL was also higher in regions 1 (26%), 2 (22%), 3 (18%) and 6 (20%) than in regions 4 (5%) and 5 (12%). The smallest dusky sharks were observed in region 4 ( of males=79cm, standard deviation=11cm; of females=79cm, standard deviation=12cm), where 79% of the observed catch consisted of sharks measuring between 75cm and 90cm FL. Dusky sharks observed in region 5 were slightly larger ( of males=83cm, standard deviation=14cm; of females=84cm, standard deviation=16cm) but 71% of the catch was comprised of sharks measuring between 75cm and 90cm FL. The largest mean size was observed in region 1 ( of males=94cm, standard deviation=19cm; of females=91cm, standard deviation=15cm), followed by region 6 ( of males=92cm, standard deviation=22cm; of females=90cm, standard deviation=24cm).

(i) Region 3 (ii) Region 4

20 10

15 Male (n=319) Male (n=617)

5 10 )

(% 5 y y 0 0 Frequenc 5 Female (n=247) 5 Female (n=733)

10

15 10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(iii) Region 5 (iv) Region 6

15 10

10 Male (n=740) Male (n=222) 5 5 ) (% y y 0 0

Frequenc 5 5 Female (n=742) Female (n=269) 10

15 10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

Figure 18. Regional sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, size distribution.

26 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 27 The average size of C. plumbeus was noticeably higher in region 6 ( of males=95cm, of females=101cm), than in all other regions. This was particularly apparent for female sharks larger than 120cm FL, with the proportion highest in region 6 at 13.8% (Figure 18), compared to 0.4% in region 3, 0.8% in region 4 and 1.5% in region 5.

3.5.2 Hound sharks (family Triakidae)

(i) Whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki (ii) School shark, Galeorhinus galeus

10 5 Male (n=1133) Male (n=134) 5 0

0 (%) 5 y y 5 enc 10 10 Frequ

15 Female (n=756) 15 Female (n=2865)

20 20 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm) (iii) Pencil shark Hypogaleus hyugaensis (iv) Gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus 30 10

20 Male (n=242) Male (n=1362) 5

10 %)

( 0 0 5 10 Frequency Female (n=3654) Female (n=251) 10 20

30 15 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(v) Grey gummy, Mustelus sp. 10 Male (n=1)

0

(%) 10

20 Female (n=44) Frequency

30

40 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 Fork Length (cm)

Figure 19. Hound shark, family Triakidae, size distribution (all zones).

26 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 27 Catches of most triakid species, were strongly female-biased (Figure 19). Female whiskery sharks outnumbered males in the observed catch by 2.5 to 1, school sharks by 5.6 to 1 and grey gummy sharks by 2.7 to 1. Pencil sharks, however, were caught in almost equal numbers. Female G. Galeorhinus ( =119cm, standard deviation=10cm) and M. antarcticus ( =110cm, standard deviation=12cm) in the catch were, on average, larger than males of the same species ( =111cm, standard deviation=11cm and ( =101cm, standard deviation = 6cm, respectively). Male and female whiskery sharks were approximately equal in length (male =111cm, standard deviation=8cm; female = 110cm, standard deviation =8cm). The mean lengths of these 3 species were higher than those of the target carcharhinid species C. obscurus and C. plumbeus.

28 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 29 (i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2

25 10

20 5 15 Male (n=860) Male (n=224)

(%) 10 0

5 5

Frequency 0 10 5 Female (n=349) Female (n=746)

10 15 70 90 110 130 150 170 70 90 110 130 150 170 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4

5 Male (n=228) 5 Male (n=42)

0 0 %)

( 5 5 10

Frequency Female (n=1953) Female (n=482) 10 15

20 15 70 90 110 130 150 170 70 90 110 130 150 170 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm) (v) West Coast (regions 5 & 6 combined) 5

Male (n=8) 0 %)

( 5

10

Frequency Female (n=123) 15

20 70 90 110 130 150 170 Fork Length (cm)

Figure 20. Regional gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus, size distribution.

Regionally, the size composition of M. antarcticus did not vary greatly (Figure 20). However, the sex composition did vary significantly. Whilst females outnumbered males in the observed catch by nearly 6:1 overall, the sex ratio shifted steadily from a heavy female bias in the catch from the west coast (15 females to every male) in Regions 5 and 6 to a male bias (2 males to every female) in the catch from the south-eastern corner of the State in Region 1.

28 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 29 (i) Region 1 (ii) Region 2

25 20

20 15 Male (n=82) Male (n=22) 15 10 5 10 (%) 0 5 5 0 10 Frequency 5 Female (n=62) 15 Female (n=30) 10 20 15 25 60 80 100 120 140 160 60 80 100 120 140 160 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(iii) Region 3 (iv) Region 4

10 10

5 Male (n=118) Male (n=593) 5 0 0 5 (%)

10 5

15 10 Frequency 20 15 25 Female (n=374) Female (n=1632) 30 20 60 80 100 120 140 160 60 80 100 120 140 160 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

(v) Region 5 (vi) Region 6

10 20

5 Male (n=242) 15 Male (n=76) 10 0

%) 5 ( 5 0 10 5

Frequency 15 Female (n=674) 10 Female (n=93)

20 15

25 20 60 80 100 120 140 160 60 80 100 120 140 160 Fork Length (cm) Fork Length (cm)

Figure 21. Regional whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki, size distribution.

Although in regions 3, 4, 5 and 6 and overall, the mean lengths of male and female Furgaleus macki were almost identical, males in regions 1 ( =121cm, standard deviation=5cm) and 2 ( =20cm, standard deviation=4cm) were significantly larger than females ( =108cm, standard deviation=6cm and =111cm, standard deviation=6cm,

30 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 31 respectively). The sex composition of the F. macki catch also varied regionally. Females outnumbered males by approximately 3:1 in regions 3, 4 and 5 but the ratio of females to males was close to 1:1 in regions 1, 2 and 6.

3.5.3 Other sharks

(i) Grey , Carcharias taurus (ii) Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni 10 10 Male (n=26) Male (n=233)

5 5 (%) y y 0 0 enc Frequ 5 Female (n=18) 5 Female (n=101)

10 10 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

(iii) Shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus (iv) Wobbegongs, family Orectolobidae

15 Male (n=48) 5 Male (n=279)

10

) 0 (% 5 y

0 5 Frequenc

5 Female (n=31) Female (n=271)

10 10 100 150 200 250 300 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 Fork Length (cm) Total Length (cm) (v) Smooth hammerhead, Sphyrna zygaena

10

Male (n=1178) 5 (%)

0 Frequency 5 Female (n=1092)

10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Fork Length (cm)

Figure 22. Other shark size distributions (all zones).

30 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 31 The overall size frequency distributions for other shark species are illustrated in Figure 22. Grey nurse sharks, Carcharias taurus, ranged in length from 86cm to 231cm TL. The mean length of male grey nurse sharks was 130cm TL and females was 132cm TL. The majority (75%) of observed Port Jackson sharks, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, were between 50cm TL and 70cm TL, although there was also a secondary smaller length mode of larger females of 92cm-94cm TL. Shortfin mako sharks, Isurus oxyrinchus, ranged in length from 76cm to 300cm FL. The mean length of male makos was 128cm FL and females was 139cm FL. The tri-modal wobbegong size frequency distribution indicates the presence of multiple species in the dataset. The smallest mode (male and female) is mainly due to the cobbler wobbegong, Sutorectus tentaculatus, the secondary mode mainly comprises a complex of the western wobbegong, Orectolobus sp. A and the as yet unnamed species, Orectolobus sp. B. The third mode is due mainly to the banded wobbegong, Orectolobus ornatus with a smaller number of spotted wobbegongs, Orectolobus maculatus. The fishery caught primarily small and intermediate-sized smooth hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna zygaena (male =91cm, standard deviation=17cm, female =93cm, standard deviation=18cm). There was no clear difference between the size frequencies of male and female smooth hammerheads.

3.6 Scalefish catch size composition Size frequency distributions of the fisheries’ major scalefish species are illustrated in Figure 23. Dotted lines indicate minimum legal sizes where applicable. Size frequency statistics are given in Appendix IV.

32 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 33 (vii) Leatherjacket, family Monacanthidae (viii) Moonlighter, Tilodon sexfasciatum 20 35

30 15 (n=380) (n=167) 25

(%) 20 10 15 quency

Fre 10 5 5

0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

(ix) Pink snapper, Pagrus auratus (x) Queen snapper, Nemadactylus valenciennesi

15 15

) 10 (n=767) 10 (n=2513) (% y y enc

equ 5 5 Fr

0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

(xi) Redfish, Centroberyx spp. (xii) Samsonfish, Seriola hippos

20 10

15 ) (n=399) (n=142) (% y y

nc 10 5 eque Fr 5

0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140150160170

Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

Figure 23. Scalefish size distribution (all zones). (continued next page)

32 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 33 (i) Western Australian salmon, (ii) Baldchin groper, Arrips truttaceus Choerodon rubescens 30 25

25 (n=58) 20 (n=211) 20 15 %)

( 15 cy 10

uen 10

Freq 5 5

0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

(iii) Western Blue groper, (iv) Boarfish, family Pentacerotidae Achoerodus gouldii 15 15

(n=895) (n=638)

%) 10 10 ( quency 5 5 Fre

0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

(v) West Australian dhufish, (vi) Knifejaw, Oplegnathus woodwardi Glaucosoma hebraicum 10 30

25 (n=1206) (n=264)

%) 20 (

5 15

10 Frequency

5

0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Total Length (cm) Total Length (cm)

Figure 23 cont. Scalefish size distribution (all zones).

34 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 35 Minimum size limits exist for some species of teleosts in Western Australia, as indicated by dotted lines in Figure 23. The number of undersized fish in the demersal gillnet catch was found to be negligible.

3.7 Non-fish bycatch Non-fish bycatch was reported infrequently during gillnet fishing observations, with a total occurrence of less than one capture per 1000 kilometre gillnet hours (Table 5). Region 5 had the highest rate of bycatch (2.3 /1000 km.gn.hr) and region 6 the lowest (0 captures). The vast majority of incidents involved invertebrate species, particularly the western rock lobster, Panulirus cygnus, (order Sepioidea) and baler shells (family Volutidae). All lobsters were caught in regions 4 and 5. Marine mammals were caught at a rate of just over 1 capture per 10,000 km gn.hours; at 4 captures per 100,000 km gn.hours and turtles at 1 capture per 100,000 km gn.hours.

Table 5. Observed regional non-fish bycatch. Region All Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 regions

Rock lobster 9 34 43 Cuttlefish 1 1 1 4 7 Baler Shell 4 1 5 (common) 2 2 4 Dolphin (unspecified) 2 2 Dolphin (bottlenose) 1 1 2 Sea Hare 1 1 2 Cormorants 1 1 Fairy penguin 1 1 Mutton bird 1 1 Sea Lion 1 1 Seal 1 1 Turtle (unspecified) 1 1

Total bycatch occurrence 3 5 1 17 45 71

Catch rate 0.8 1.8 0.1 0.4 2.3 0.0 0.9 (no. animals/ 000 km.gn.hr)

34 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 35 4.0 Discussion The Western Australian temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, operate across an area encompassing subtropical and temperate waters of the Indian and Southern oceans and covering 1,560 km of coastline. Unsurprisingly, the fishery’s catch consists of a wide variety of elasmobranch and teleost (scalefish) fauna and shows noticeable regional variation in its composition. Despite the diversity of the catch, between 1994 and 1999, these fisheries remained highly targeted towards catching a small number of shark species, with the majority of landings (57%, by weight) consisting of only three species of sharks: ‘bronze whaler’ (primarily dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus), gummy shark, Mustelus antarcticus and whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki. Examination of catches on a finer geographic scale, however, highlights how the fishery has evolved regionally to exploit a variety of locally abundant species. As a means of validating the accuracy of commercial catch records of the main target shark species, bootstrapping research observed catch rates proved to be of limited use as the total catches of dusky, gummy, whiskery and sandbar catches were all underestimated. It is highly unlikely that underestimation of the catches of these high-value species was caused by widespread over-reporting of commercial landings, as this would result in higher license fees for the fishery and higher rates of income tax for individual fishers. It is more likely that, because research sampling was not designed to collect data specifically for this purpose, observed catch rates were unrepresentative of commercial CPUE due to temporal and spatial biases in the sampling program. Specifically, the relatively low levels of research effort in regions 1 and 6, respectively, were likely to have caused under representation of commercial catches of gummy and sandbar sharks. However, the reasons for the underestimates of dusky and whiskery shark catches are less clear as relatively high proportions of commercial effort were observed in regions 4 and 5, where the majority of these species’ landings were reported. In these cases, commercial catch rates may simply have been higher during unobserved times, in unobserved areas or on unobserved vessels. Alternatively but less likely, fishing behaviour might have been changed by the presence of observers on vessels. However, from the authors’ understanding of individual vessels’ fishing strategies and observations of skippers’ personal fishing records (e.g. vessel ‘logbooks’, marks on GPS plotters, etc.), there was no indication that vessel behaviour was affected by the presence of observers. It is also considered highly unlikely that fishers would risk lower catch rates and, therefore financial penalty by changing their fishing strategies in order to voluntarily take observers to sea. It is apparent from these results that in order to accurately estimate commercial catches using observer data in a geographically large, multi-species fishery such as this, the level of observer coverage needs to be high. Based on the results from region 4, where target catches were underestimated despite 19.8% of commercial effort being observed, it is suggested that the required level of observer coverage needs to be greater than 20% of commercial effort. Further, to account for regional, temporal and inter-vessel variations in CPUE, observer effort must be applied more uniformly than was possible during this study. In terms of percentages of the fishery’s total elasmobranch catch, the commercial and research data agree that the three traditional target species ‘bronze whaler’ (primarily dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus), remained the dominant component of the fishery’s catch during the late 1990s. Although the descriptive name of ‘bronze whaler’ is commonly used to refer to multiple species of carcharhinid (whaler) sharks, C. obscurus were found to account

36 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 37 for 98% of the ‘bronze whaler’ catch observed during this study. The only other species of ‘bronze whaler’ identified from the research data was Carcharhinus brachyurus, also known as the copper shark. Although C. bracyurus were observed in all regions of the fishery, they were slightly more common in catches from the south-east of the State. Research observed length frequencies show that, 97.5% of the observed JASDGDLF and WCDGDLF gillnet dusky shark catch consisted of sharks with a fork length of less than 125cm (i.e. less than 6 years old according to Simpfendorfer et al, 2002). These data confirm that the 16.5cm (61⁄2”) and 17.8cm (7”) gillnet mesh sizes permitted in these fisheries are highly selective in catching only the youngest age-classes of dusky sharks (Simpfendorfer and Unsworth, 1998a), which is believed to be critical to the ongoing sustainability of this stock (Stevens et al, 1997; Simpfendorfer, 1999a; Simpfendorfer, 1999b). Examination of these size frequency data regionally is believed to provide some important insight into aspects of the early life history of C. obscurus in Western Australia. Dusky sharks in region 4 were, on average, smaller than anywhere else and the range of size classes caught there was narrower than in other regions. The mean size and range of size classes both increased in adjacent regions and continued to progressively increase in regions to the north and east, suggesting that the south west corner of the State is the principal area for dusky shark parturition (‘pupping’), with juvenile C. obscurus gradually spreading to adjacent south and west coast waters as they grow. Gummy sharks, M. antarcticus, continued to be an important component of the demersal gillnet catch in south coast regions whilst remaining only a minor component of the catch in south-western and western regions. The observed size composition was very similar to that reported by Lenanton et al, 1990 and consisted primarily of large adult females. The regional research data indicate an apparent sexual segregation of the gummy shark stock in Western Australia. Whilst females outnumbered males in the observed catch by 6:1 overall, the sex ratio shifted steadily from a heavy female bias in the catch from the west coast (15 females to every male) to a male bias (2 males to every female) in the catch from the south-eastern corner of the State. Similar segregation has been noticed in the south-eastern Australian Southern Shark Fishery (SSF), where females are more common in the catch from Victorian and Tasmanian waters and males are proportionately more significant in catches from the western Great Australian Bight (Walker, personal communication3). The segregation of sexes implies that some form of breeding migration must occur, however the details of such movements are poorly understood. Whiskery sharks also remained a significant component of the fisheries’ catch in all six regions, despite the results of recent population modeling suggesting that their biomass has fallen to 32% of its unexploited level (McAuley and Gaughan, In Press). Whilst F. macki was actively targeted during the early development of the WA ‘shark’ fisheries, as catch rates began to decline in the 1980s, the fishery redirected fishing effort towards catching the more abundant species, such as C. obscurus and M. antarcticus (Simpfendorfer et al, 2000) and these data clearly indicate that by the late 1990s whiskery sharks were no longer as important as catches of these other species. Small whiskery sharks were almost entirely excluded from the catch due to the size-selectivity of the permitted gillnet mesh-sizes, as described by Simpfendorfer and Unsworth, 1998a. Females were approximately 3 times more common than males in catches from the south-west and lower west coasts; males slightly outnumbered females in the far south east of the State and catches of males and females were roughly equal elsewhere. The regional sex ratios indicate that the whiskery shark stock is sexually segregated and that some form of reproductive migration must therefore occur, as was suggested by Simpfendorfer and Unsworth, 1998b.

______3 T. Walker, Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute. Queenscliff, . Australia.

36 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 37 Whilst the fishery for these traditional ‘target’ shark species has been well reported, the secondary, but regionally important, components of the fisheries’ catch have been less well described. Sandbar sharks have been an important component of the catch in the northern region of the WCDGDLF for a number of years, partly because the Abrolhos Islands have provided a safe offshore anchorage for accessing the deeper waters where they occur. Catches only began to increase in lower West Coast and south-western regions during the mid to late 1990s as operators began upgrading to larger and more powerful vessels and could access the deeper offshore waters. Until the late 1990s, C. plumbeus was seen as a low value product compared to traditional target species and there was little incentive for fishers to target them. However, increases in the price of shark fins on international markets, together with declines in the catch of traditional target species, have generated increased fishing pressure on sandbar sharks, which have large fins relative to their body-size. The effects of this increased level of exploitation is currently being studied as part of a 3-year research project, part funded by the Fisheries Research and Development corporation. Estimated sandbar catches were very close to commercially reported catches in regions 3 and 4, where C. plumbeus was not heavily targeted and in region 5 where they only became a target of the fishery in the latter years of this study. Significant regional variations were also apparent in JASDGDLF catches. Although they may occasionally occur as far up the west coast as Perth (Last and Stevens, 1994), school sharks, Galeorhinus galeus, were only an important component of the catch in Region 1. Like other species of hound sharks (family Triakidae) caught in these fisheries, the catch of G. galeus is apparently distinctly female-biased, suggesting a strong sexual segregation of the stock. Because only 2 years of research CPUE data were available for region 1, the commercial catch could not be estimated from research observed catch rates. Dogfish were only landed in significant quantities in region 2, where a handful of Esperance-based vessels began targeting squalene-rich species (mainly uyato and Squalus mitsukurii, Daley et al 2002) during the mid 1990s. This fishery was short-lived as, according to fishers who were involved at the time, catch rates began to decline dramatically and the fishery for these species had all but ceased by 1999 (McAuley, unpublished data). Because dogfish occur in deep continental slope waters, which are outside the current range of the demersal gillnet and demersal longline fleet, they are unlikely to be subject to continued exploitation by these fisheries. As was the case with the primary shark species, the estimated catches of the principal teleost species were lower than their commercially reported catches. The notable exception was Dhufish, Glaucosoma hebraicum. The underestimation of catches of queen snapper, Nemadactylus valenciennesi, blue groper, Achoerodus gouldii, and pink snapper, Pagrus auratus, may be explained by high commercial catch rates at unobserved times and locations. This is particularly likely for these species, which probably aggregate to for relatively short periods at discreet locations within demersal gillnet fishing grounds. However, dhufish, Glaucosoma hebraicum are also known to form spawning aggregations, yet research CPUE was consistently higher than commercial CPUE. As the highest value teleost species caught in the demersal gillnet fishery (valued at $8.50-$9.50 between 94/95 and 98/99), there may have been some incentive for operators to underreport their catches. Despite the limitations of bootstrapping our research observed catch rates in validating commercially reported catches of the principal target species, the estimated catches offer a useful indication of which secondary, minor and bycatch species might have

38 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 39 been underreported in commercial fishing returns data. Catches of hammerhead sharks, wobbegongs, ‘blacktip’ sharks (mainly Carcharhinus brevipinna), shortfin mako sharks, pencil and tiger sharks were all estimated to be higher than commercially reported, strongly suggesting that a portion of the catch of these species were either undescribed in monthly fishing returns or selectively discarded. Additionally, as these data were found to underestimate catches of the main target species, the same might be true for these other catches and their true catches might be even higher than we have estimated. As fishers are not required to report their discarded bycatch, these estimates offer the best available indication of the magnitude of these catches, however they do not provide any information on the mortality of bycatch species. From the authors’ own observations, rates of bycatch mortality varied significantly between each species but in general, survival rates of elasmobranchs captured by gillnets were higher than for teleosts. This technique may also prove useful in monitoring the level of bycatch of the protected grey nurse shark, Carcharias taurus. Since it’s protection in 1997 under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act and the State administered Wildlife Conservation Act, commercial catches of this species have ceased. These data, therefore, now represent the only available means of estimating their bycatch in these fisheries. Research observed CPUE data are, however, likely to be of less use in determining catches of great white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, due to the rarity of their capture and the high level of monitoring that would be required to provide a meaningful dataset.

5.0 Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the considerable assistance of the licensees, skippers and crews of the Joint Authority Southern and West Coast Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline fisheries. In particular, the authors would like to thank: Terry Adams, Nathan Adams, Mark Bubb, Geoff Campbell, Graham Challis, Jeff and Daniel Cooke, Gary Green, Carlo and Jason Gullotti, Tony Lambert Sean and Malcolm Mackenzie, Peter Osborn, Paul Retsas, Alan Robertson, Darren Sapelli, Brian Scimone, John Smythe, Nick and Emanuel Soulos, Jamie Thornton, Lee Warner, Peter Warrilow, Jeff White and Mark Williams. We also wish to thank all the staff from the Western Australian Marine Research Laboratory who collected these data, under sometimes arduous conditions, especially: Justin Bellanger, Justin Chidlow, Mark Cliff, Kevin Donohue, Adrian Kitchingman, Tony Paust, Kathy Tobin and Phil Unsworth. We would also like to thank the staff of the WA Department Of Fisheries Catch and Effort Statistics Section, in particular, Mark Cliff, Eva Lai, Wilf Lehre and Marie Wapnah for the provision of monthly catch and effort data. Thanks also to Dan Gaughan, Rod Lenanton, Mike Moran, Peter Stephenson and Jim Penn for their assistance in the preparation of this document. Finally, we wish to thank the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) for their financial support for the two projects from which these research observer data were derived: Stock Assessment of Large Coastal and Demersal Sharks (FRDC Project no. 93/67) and Biology and Stock Assessment of Western Australia’s Commercially Important Shark Species (FRDC project 96/130).

38 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 39 6.0 References Al Sakaff, H. and Esseen, M. 1999. Length-weight relationship of fishes from Yemen waters (Gulf of Aden and Red Sea). NAGA. ICLARM Q., 22 (1): 41-42 Branstetter, S. and Musick, J. A. 1994. Age and growth for the sand tiger in the northwestern . Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. Washington D.C.; Vol. 123, no. 2: 242-254 Bridge, N. F.; Mackay, D. and Newton, G. 1999. Biology of the ornate angel shark (Squatina tergocellata) from the Great Australian Bight. Mar. Freshwater Res. 49: 679-86 Campbell, G. and Collins, R. A. 1975. The age and growth of the Pacific Bonito, Sarda chiliensis, in the eastern North Pacific. Fish & Game 61 (4): 181 - 200 Cliff, G. and Dudley, S. F. J., 1992. Sharks caught in the protective gill nets off Natal, . 6. The copper shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus (Guenther). South African Journal of Marine Science. Vol. 12: 663-674 Daley, R., Stevens, J. and Graham, K. 2002. Catch analysis and productivity of the deepwater dogfish resource in southern Australia. Final Report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation for Project 1998/108, June 2002. Dulcic, J. and Kralijevic, M., 1996. Weight-length relationship for 40 fish species in the eastern Adriatic (Croatian waters). Fish. Res. 28 (3): 243-251 Chidlow, J., 2003. Biology of wobbegong sharks from south-west Western Australian waters. Unpublished Msc Thesis, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia. Claro, R. and J.P. García-Arteaga, 1994. Crecimiento. p. 321-402. In R. Claro (ed.) Ecología de los peces marinos de Cuba. Inst. Oceanol. Acad. Cienc. Cuba. and Cen. Invest. Quintana Roo (CIQRO) México. Garcia-Arteaga, J.P.; Claro, R. and Valle, S., 1997. Length-weight relationships of Cuban marine fishes. NAGA ICLARM Q., 20 (1): 38-43 Graham, K. J., 1999. Trawl fish length-weight relationships from data collected during FRV Kapala surveys. Fisheries Research Report Series: 2. New South Wales Fisheries. ISSN 1442-0147 Hancock, D. A. and Edmonds, J.S., 1977. Mercury in shark in Western Australia. A preliminary report. Fish. Res. Bull. Dep. Fish. Wildl. (West. Aust.); no. 18, 22 pp Heald, D. I. , 1987. The commercial shark fishery in temperate waters of Western Australia. Fisheries Department of Western Australia Research Report No. 75, 71pp. Kailola, P. J.; Williams, M. J.; Stewart, P. C.; Reichelt, R. E.; McNee, A. and Grieve, C. 1993. Australian Fisheries Resources. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Department of Primary Industries and the Fisheries Research & Development Corporation. Canberra, Australia, 422pp. Kohler, N. E.; Casey, J. G. and Turner, P. A., 1995. Length-weight relationships for 13 species of sharks from the western North Atlantic. Fishery Bulletin. 93 (2): 412-418

40 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 41 Last, P. R and Stevens, J. D., 1994. Sharks and Rays of Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 513pp. Lenanton, R. C. J., Heald, D. I., Platell, M., Cliff, M. and Shaw, J., 1990. Aspects of the Reproductive Biology of the Gummy Shark, Mustelus antarcticus Günther, from Waters off the South Coast of Western Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 1990, 41, 807- 22 Letourneur, Y.; Kulbicki, M. and Labrosse, P., 1998. Length-weight relationship of fish from coral reefs and lagoons of New Caledonia, southwestern Pacific Ocean: an update. NAGA. ICLARM Q., 21 (4): 39-46 Magnusson, J. and Magnusson, J. V. V., 1987. ICEIDA/Cape Verde Islands Fisheries Project. Survey of resources in the waters off Cape Verde Islands. IV. Report: summary of information on species. Icelandic International Development Agency/ Marine Research Institute. 114 pp. McAuley, R. and Gaughan, D. In Press. Demersal Gillnet and Demersal Longline Fisheries; in State of the Fisheries, 2001-2002, Editor, J.W. Penn. Fisheries Western Australia. Merella, P.; Quetglas, A.; Alemany, F. and Carbonell, A., 1997. Length-weight relationship of fishes and from the Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean). NAGA. ICLARM Q., 20 (3/4): 66-68 Moran, M. J. and Burton, C., 1990. Relationships among and whole lengths and weights for Western Australian pink snapper Chrysophrys auratus (), Fisheries Research Report No. 89, Fisheries Department of Western Australia. Pauly, D.; Cabanban, A. and Torres, F. S. B. Jr., 1996. Fishery biology of 40 trawl-caught teleosts of western Indonesia. P. 135-216. In D. Pauly and P. Martosubroto (eds.). Baseline studies of biodiversity: the fish resource of western Indonesia. ICLARM studies and Reviews 23. Simpfendorfer, C., Lenanton, R. and Unsworth, P. 1996. Stock assessment of large coastal and demersal sharks. Final Report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation for Project 93/067, 59pp., September 1996. Simpfendorfer, C. A. and Donohue, K. 1998. Keeping the fish in fish’n’chips: research and management of the Western Australian shark fishery. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 49: 593-600. Simpfendorfer, C. A. and Unsworth, P., 1998a. Gillnet mesh selectivity of dusky (Carcharhinus obscurus) and whiskery, (Furgaleus macki) sharks from south-western Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 49: 713-718. Simpfendorfer, C. A. and Unsworth, P., 1998b. Reproductive biology of the whiskery shark, Furgaleus macki, from south-western Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49: 687-693. Simpfendorfer, CA. 1999a. Demographic analysis of the dusky shark fishery in south- western Australia. In, Musick, J. A. (ed), “Life in the Slow Lane: Ecology and Conservation of Long-Lived Marine Animals.” pp 149-160. American Fisheries Society Symposium No 23, Bethesda, Maryland

40 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 41 Simpfendorfer, C., 1999b. Management of shark fisheries in western Australia. Case studies of the management of elasmobranch fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. Shotton, R. (ed.) No. 378/1, Rome, FAO. pp. 425-455. Simpfendorfer, C. A.; McAuley, R..; Chidlow, J.; Lenanton, R.; Hall, N. and Bastow, T. 1999. Biology and stock assessment of Western Australia’s commercially important shark species. Final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation for project 96/130, 99 pp. December 1999. ISBN 0 7309 8448 6 Simpfendorfer, C. A.; Donohue, K. and Hall, N. G., 2000. Stock assessment and risk analysis for the whiskery shark (Furgaleus macki (Whiteley)) in south-western Australia. Fisheries Research. 47: 1-17 Steffe, A. S.; Murphy J. J.; Chapman, D. J.; Tarlinton, B. E.; Gordon, G. N. G. and Grinberg, A., 1996. An assessment of the impact of offshore in New South Wales waters on the management of commercial fisheries. Final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. ISBN 0 7310 9405 0 Stevens, J. D. and McLoughlin, K. J., 1991. Distribution, size and sex composition, reproductive biology and diet of sharks from northern Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 42: 151-99 Stevens, JD, Walker, TI and Simpfendorfer, CA. 1997. Are southern Australian shark fisheries sustainable? In, Hancock, DA, Smith,DC, Grant, A and Beumer, JP. (Eds.) “Developing and Sustaining World Fisheries Resources. The State of Science and Managment. 2nd World Fisheries Congress.” pp62-66. CSIRO, Melbourne. Sumner, N. R. and Williamson, P.C., 1999. A 12-month survey of coastal recreational boat fishing between Augusta and Kalbarri on the west coast of Western Austraila during 1996-97. Fisheries Research Report No. 117. Western Australian Marine Research Laboratories, Fisheries Western Australia. Taylor, R. B. and Willis, T. J. 1998. Relationships amongst length, weight and growth of north-eastern fishes. Mar. Freshwater Res. 49 (3): 255-260 Torres, F. S. B., Jr., 1991. Tabular data on marine fishes from . Part 1. Length- weight relationships. Fishbyte. 9 (1): 50-53 Walker, T. I. 1999. Southern Australian shark fishery management. Case studies of the management of elasmobranch fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. Shotton, R. (ed.) No. 378/2, Rome, FAO. pp. 480-514 Whitely, G. P., 1943. Preliminary report on the long line fishery at Bunbury WA. Unpublished report, 9 pp (available from Western Australian Marine Research Laboratories: North Beach, WA) Willing, R. S. and Pender, P. J., 1989. Length-weight relationships for 45 species of fish and three invertebrates from Australia’s northern fishery. Northern Territory Dept. Primary Industry and Fish., Australia, Tech. Bull., 142. 57 pp. Yanagawa, H. 1994. Length-weight relationships of fishes. NAGA ICLARM Q., 17 (4): 48-52

42 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 43 8 530 391 324 4,984 4,349 53,098 50,043 45,742 43,453 29,539 18,183 72,660 Total 221,118 374,245 282,064 198,760 120,181 1,298,556 0 0 35 48 118 346 167 191 570 182 162 205 5,823 4,676 1,253 1,879 1,652 1,084 12,568 Longline Annual mean 8 412 391 276 4,802 4,187 52,930 50,008 45,551 41,802 28,455 17,613 72,455 215,295 Gillnet 118,302 369,569 281,718 197,507 1,285,987 41 240 2,501 4,203 1,438 1,956 44,793 23,684 36,485 17,664 15,342 86,908 Total 208,927 336,879 314,353 179,372 153,754 1,219,613 83 81 914 210 134 963 126 331 4,612 4,702 1,288 1,081 1,478 11,391 Longline 1998-1999 41 159 2,501 4,077 1,355 1,956 44,659 23,684 35,404 16,186 14,379 86,577 Gillnet 204,315 332,177 313,439 179,162 152,466 1,208,222 659 833 4,851 4,137 54,289 56,008 22,166 46,072 44,518 21,247 67,482 Total 242,157 331,799 298,799 196,985 164,752 1,314,597 49 100 569 150 299 2,762 5,089 2,864 3,654 1,727 28,605 11,342 15,445 Longline 1997-1998 659 833 4,701 4,088 55,439 54,289 22,166 43,208 40,864 19,520 67,183 Gillnet 226,712 320,457 298,699 194,223 159,663 1,285,992 19 4,017 4,765 1,271 55,429 51,692 13,320 44,517 28,970 21,302 72,064 Total 222,378 402,823 305,634 197,396 124,450 1,327,669 45 79 51 75 448 102 301 180 6,605 4,019 2,156 1,076 2,092 Longline 1996-1997 19 3,716 4,690 1,091 55,350 51,692 13,320 42,425 28,868 21,251 72,064 Gillnet 218,359 400,667 305,186 196,320 124,405 1,321,064 151 477 5,878 5,485 80,979 54,997 69,532 40,928 21,263 19,290 65,819 Total 209,284 374,167 220,400 198,309 102,530 1,260,205 44 29 43 51 701 102 356 954 865 159 291 3,595 1,170 Longline 1995-1996 151 477 5,719 5,434 80,979 54,953 69,532 40,063 21,234 19,247 65,528 208,114 Gillnet 373,466 220,298 197,953 101,576 1,256,610 331 292 5,973 5,920 76,972 54,261 51,020 88,194 49,265 35,278 13,734 71,026 Total 222,844 425,556 271,135 221,737 1,370,694 11 66 166 175 156 175 552 331 239 105 3,870 4,480 1,861 2,973 1,356 12,646 Longline 1994-1995 53 5,798 5,368 Commercial Commercial demersal gillnet & longline catch and effort, July 1994 – June 1999 73,999 54,250 50,845 88,194 47,909 35,122 13,668 70,921 Gillnet 218,974 421,076 270,969 219,876 1,358,048 Appendices (i) All regions

7.0 Appendix I. 1. Elasmobranchs Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) ‘Bronze whaler’ Gummy Whiskery Sandbar Hammerhead School Dogfish Wobbegong ‘Blacktip’ Skates and Rays Pencil Grey nurse Tiger ‘Copper whaler’ Great white Mako (shortfin) Unspecified Total

42 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 43 Appendix I cont. 929 262 157 106 6,954 1,108 1,733 31,011 44,152 29,258 23,981 Total 107,355 215,997 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 233 326 Longline Annual mean 929 262 157 106 6,954 1,108 1,733 31,009 44,152 29,258 23,748 Gillnet 107,263 215,671 16 413 1,467 1,366 Total 34,022 22,961 23,653 18,854 148,496 217,226 3 464 1,164 1,628 Longline 1998-1999 16 413 1,467 1,366 34,013 22,961 23,653 17,690 Gillnet 148,032 215,598 186 9,667 1,200 1,957 1,286 2,522 Total 24,117 37,044 45,048 50,054 127,208 263,245

Longline 1997-1998 186 9,667 1,200 1,957 1,286 2,522 24,117 37,044 45,048 50,054 Gillnet 127,208 263,245 159 7,247 1,479 1,462 Total 24,030 85,364 46,889 24,912 26,173 193,685

Longline 1996-1997 159 7,247 1,479 1,462 24,030 85,364 46,889 24,912 26,173 Gillnet 193,685 64 372 6,958 4,341 2,713 Total 27,687 69,909 64,509 15,312 23,028 187,206

Longline 1995-1996 64 372 6,958 4,341 2,713 27,687 69,909 64,509 15,312 23,028 Gillnet 187,206 24 426 784 105 602 9,433 Total 32,272 41,354 32,360 27,734 105,800 218,622

Longline 1994-1995 24 426 784 105 602 9,433 32,272 41,354 32,360 27,734 Gillnet 105,800 218,622 (ii) Region 1 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Gummy School Whiskery ‘Bronze whaler’ Hammerhead Dogfish Wobbegong Sandbar Skates and Rays Pencil Unspecified Total

44 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 45 Appendix I cont. 3 73 34 685 561 4,903 3,831 1,361 28,373 20,767 17,382 Total 108,096 186,070 30,363.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13 56 69 Longline 3 Annual mean 73 34 685 561 4,903 3,831 1,305 30,323 28,373 20,767 17,369 108,096 186,001 Gillnet 0 16 469 843 5,627 1,180 1,252 Total 28,563 32,668 19,728 106,891 168,674

Longline 1998-1999 16 469 843 5,627 1,180 1,252 28,563 32,668 19,728 Gillnet 106,891 168,674 33 116 8,780 3,423 1,762 Total 25,067 26,838 15,306 13,558 106,646 176,462 68 65 280 345 Longline 1997-1998 33 116 8,780 3,423 1,482 24,864 26,838 15,306 13,493 176,117 Gillnet 106,646 997 472 127 5,754 4,676 4,589 1,524 37,769 38,424 20,128 Total 144,386 221,077

Longline 1996-1997 997 472 127 5,754 4,676 4,589 1,524 37,769 38,424 20,128 Gillnet 144,386 221,077 266 881 137 169 1,911 3,275 1,739 Total 32,811 89,492 22,896 37,053 16,638 174,457

Longline 1995-1996 266 881 137 169 1739 1,911 3,275 32,811 89,492 22,896 37,053 16,638 Gillnet 174,457 867 577 103 528 8,677 2,239 Total 27,608 93,067 21,041 45,723 16,860 189,682

Longline 1994-1995 867 577 103 528 8,677 2,239 27,608 93,067 21,041 45,723 16,860 189,682 Gillnet (iii) Region 2 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Gummy Whiskery Dogfish ‘Bronze whaler’ School Hammerhead Wobbegong Pencil Grey nurse Skates and Rays ‘Blacktip’ Unspecified Total

44 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 45 Appendix I cont. 32 989 562 266 7,518 7,444 5,068 3,252 2,353 Total 76,466 59,623 33,324 23,656 15,654 10,829 247,034 34,391.4 0 6 9 0 0 0 56 35 15 58 255 320 146 135 485 142 1,406 Longline Annual mean 32 954 547 266 3,111 7,512 7,435 4,583 2,353 33,628 76,146 59,478 33,189 23,656 15,598 10,770 Gillnet 245,628 801 254 169 2,501 5,335 7,999 5,336 2,974 Total 26,573 71,413 55,791 26,367 16,899 16,108 211,947 48 43 29 202 163 147 749 107 1,286 Longline 1998-1999 801 254 169 2,501 5,306 7,999 4,587 2,867 25,968 71,250 55,743 26,220 16,856 16,108 Gillnet 210,661 461 874 833 5,660 6,299 5,049 2,625 8,987 Total 32,584 85,439 58,743 31,387 15,475 10,693 10,963 243,488 76 676 512 162 138 576 142 1,606 Longline 1997-1998 461 874 833 5,660 6,299 4,473 2,483 8,987 30,555 84,927 58,667 31,225 15,337 10,693 10,963 Gillnet 241,882 19 127 566 159 7,566 4,298 2,699 1,218 7,935 Total 36,023 90,930 66,732 32,723 15,087 13,547 10,673 254,279 56 75 199 377 448 248 646 301 2,151 Longline 1996-1997 19 127 491 159 7,566 3,652 2,398 1,218 7,935 35,425 90,553 66,284 32,475 15,031 13,547 10,673 Gillnet 252,128 359 520 477 3,112 5,437 7,988 4,735 3,937 7,739 Total 32,842 61,914 54,150 29,149 60,182 14,860 254,559 38 96 33 43 190 264 452 159 262 1,347 Longline 1995-1996 359 520 477 3,112 5,437 7,945 4,283 3,778 7,477 54,112 32,271 61,650 29,053 60,182 14,827 Gillnet 253,212 399 989 682 2,576 4,261 5,920 4,027 Total 11,399 43,936 72,635 62,701 46,992 42,369 15,949 270,899 6 11 20 30 118 286 175 640 Longline 1994-1995 399 814 682 2,576 4,261 5,920 4,027 11,369 43,918 72,349 62,583 46,972 42,369 15,938 Gillnet 270,259 (iv) Region 3 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) ‘Bronze whaler’ Gummy Whiskery Dogfish Hammerhead Sandbar Skates and Rays Wobbegong Pencil ‘Blacktip’ School Grey nurse Great white Tiger Unspecified Total

46 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 47 Appendix I cont. 48 118 216 161 6,833 3,223 1,879 1,854 56,993 12,412 10,819 38,357 Total 129,919 262,831 44,845.8 9 0 7 0 5 53 13 48 21 113 118 560 130 1,434 2,458 Longline Annual mean 0 0 31 211 6,826 3,223 1,766 1,841 11,853 44,686 56,984 10,819 38,336 Gillnet 128,484 260,373 81 790 515 100 9,087 2,818 Total 50,470 67,819 12,829 19,180 46,775 140,251 300,245 17 81 214 1,504 1,799 Longline 1998-1999 790 515 100 9,087 2,604 50,420 67,819 12,829 19,180 46,775 Gillnet 138,747 298,446 49 280 9,925 7,672 3,294 3,004 4,667 Total 42,128 40,910 10,898 32,137 105,123 217,959 8 36 89 67 49 1,425 1,638 Longline 1997-1998 272 9,925 7,672 3,294 2,937 4,667 42,020 40,910 10,809 32,137 Gillnet 103,698 216,321 321 180 5,443 4,220 1,469 2,091 Total 45,643 48,807 12,641 19,293 37,317 132,143 263,925 45 23 97 940 180 1,361 2,601 Longline 1996-1997 321 5,420 4,220 1,372 2,091 11,701 45,509 48,807 19,293 37,317 Gillnet 130,782 261,324 207 123 4,299 7,676 3,702 1,000 1,930 Total 11,834 42,451 65,803 36,359 132,114 265,047 11 80 35 29 51 29 437 413 1005 Longline 1995-1996 72 971 207 4,299 7,665 3,702 1,930 42,211 11,421 65,768 36,330 Gillnet 131,677 264,042 66 173 633 331 239 1,399 4,285 4,107 1,102 Total 43,537 61,627 13,860 39,195 139,962 266,979 11 89 66 16 75 156 552 331 239 2,445 1,356 5,247 Longline 1994-1995 81 946 157 1,399 4,285 4,107 43,271 61,616 12,504 39,120 Gillnet 137,517 261,732 (v) Region 4 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) ‘Bronze whaler’ Whiskery Wobbegong Sandbar Hammerhead Gummy ‘Blacktip’ Skates and Rays Pencil Grey nurse Tiger Great white Unspecified Total

46 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 47 Appendix I cont. 8 6 95 391 352 7,130 2,904 1,675 Total 82,048 43,440 40,439 18,121 14,889 14,682 17,986 244,168 47,296.4 0 0 4 0 0 3 85 17 447 620 607 104 971 548 2,272 1,122 6,353 Longline Annual mean 8 6 92 391 352 6,582 2,819 1,659 13,711 45,957 79,776 42,318 39,818 17,514 14,785 17,983 Gillnet 237,814 41 199 159 192 8,051 8,268 3,063 1,720 1,956 Total 33,146 46,932 53,027 23,381 10,346 15,873 173,208 36 91 83 19 118 332 963 402 6,117 1,868 1,059 1,264 Longline 1998-1999 41 116 159 173 7,960 7,004 2,100 1,318 1,956 32,793 45,064 51,968 23,345 10,014 15,873 Gillnet 167,091 83 517 9,573 2,420 1,374 Total 55,223 67,725 74,715 36,284 21,207 14,053 20,508 14,885 263,344 24 13 431 1,771 9,073 4,504 2,238 2,199 3,587 1,727 23,796 Longline 1997-1998 83 517 7,846 2,396 1,374 70,211 49,910 58,652 34,046 19,008 13,622 16,921 14,872 Gillnet 239,548 24 932 7,332 2,859 2,236 Total 11,494 49,410 91,630 38,730 40,479 19,543 17,563 23,533 256,355 5 45 51 344 418 828 506 1,853 Longline 1996-1997 24 932 7,281 2,859 2,236 11,489 48,378 91,212 38,685 39,651 19,037 17,563 23,533 Gillnet 254,502 113 151 8,193 2,406 2,614 Total 51,473 87,343 27,819 55,220 18,248 17,380 12,485 17,186 249,158

Longline 1995-1996 113 151 8,193 2,406 2,614 51,473 87,343 27,819 55,220 18,248 17,380 12,485 17,186 Gillnet 249,158 65 32 5,115 7,488 1,953 Total 47,230 22,909 46,830 21,263 17,399 20,656 18,452 116,611 278,773

Longline 1994-1995 65 32 5,115 7,488 1,953 47,230 22,909 46,830 21,263 17,399 20,656 18,452 Gillnet 116,611 278,773 (vi) Region 5 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) ‘Bronze whaler’ Sandbar Whiskery Wobbegong Hammerhead ‘Blacktip’ Skates and Rays Gummy Grey nurse Copper Tiger Pencil Mako (shortfin) Dogfish Unspecified Total

48 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 49 Appendix I cont. 28 862 753 205 6,237 4,937 1,877 1,565 2,395 58,143 44,448 10,622 10,373 Total 142,445 33,209.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 32 67 752 404 489 191 1,173 1,957 Longline Annual mean 14 28 840 721 9,884 6,237 4,937 1,877 1,565 2,327 29,692 57,391 44,044 10,622 Gillnet 140,488 78 665 5,761 5,484 6,381 3,662 1,070 3,765 5,534 Total 36,152 76,212 39,701 148,313 3 27 200 331 561 1,198 Longline 1998-1999 78 665 5,761 5,457 6,381 3,662 1,070 3,765 5,203 32,557 76,012 39,698 Gillnet 147,752 708 488 142 6,845 5,718 1,840 1,644 5,213 Total 50,111 11,512 68,133 35,837 12,019 150,099 6 585 267 362 2,597 1,220 Longline 1997-1998 708 488 142 6,845 5,718 1,840 1,644 5,207 11,150 42,320 67,548 35,570 12,019 Gillnet 148,879 342 293 5,559 5,500 1,836 1,206 2,073 Total 29,503 52,880 41,819 14,789 12,051 138,348

752 Longline 1996-1997 342 293 5,559 5,500 1,836 1,206 2,073 27,248 52,880 41,819 14,789 12,051 Gillnet 138,348 83 741 676 954 7,419 9,929 5,473 4,848 2,091 1,010 Total 22,020 43,424 53,130 129,778 64 120 225 954 1,243 Longline 1995-1996 83 677 676 7,419 9,704 5,473 4,848 2,091 1,010 21,660 43,424 53,130 Gillnet 128,535 70 345 850 6,929 4,956 2,549 1,135 1,026 Total 28,262 50,064 51,754 13,121 12,887 145,686 48 159 1,196 2,973 1,749 1,830 6,759 Longline 1994-1995 70 297 867 850 6,929 4,956 2,549 1,135 11,057 24,675 47,091 50,005 13,121 Gillnet 138,927 (vii) Region 6 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Sandbar Bronze whaler’ ‘Blacktip’ Whiskery Wobbegong Hammerhead Grey nurse Skates and Rays Gummy Pencil Dogfish Tiger Unspecified Total

48 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 49 Appendix I cont. 809 721 650 505 491 485 417 417 342 315 6,110 5,394 4,774 3,077 2,517 2,224 1,904 Total 11,780 48,934 29,692 20,475 19,429 221,118 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 13 48 19 311 105 400 154 370 243 1989 5,823 2,359 6,050 2,078 Longline Annual mean 235 809 721 650 351 121 485 174 398 342 313 9,702 6,097 5,289 4,774 2,677 2,469 1,902 18,116 48,623 29,680 13,379 Gillnet 215,295 20 534 596 152 423 295 170 139 251 4,356 6,824 4,344 2,934 2,047 5,540 1,006 1,042 Total 44,740 30,263 14,995 25,028 10,289 208,927 3 9 8 65 26 16 20 86 38 483 139 325 4,612 1,168 7,077 2,063 5,171 Longline 1998-1999 84 369 997 534 596 152 407 295 101 243 8,226 4,291 6,685 4,344 2,609 2,021 1,042 44,257 30,260 13,827 17,951 Gillnet 204,315 75 119 296 371 380 453 231 543 592 7,697 6,381 4,540 3,541 1,875 2,945 2,071 1,761 Total 50,538 27,529 26,472 28,405 19,080 242,157 5 20 39 681 222 467 215 453 333 6,734 8,381 6,594 2,239 15,445 Longline 1997-1998 75 119 706 296 371 341 231 210 587 7,697 6,159 4,540 3,074 1,660 2,071 1,761 49,857 27,509 19,738 20,024 12,486 Gillnet 226,712 271 426 268 193 752 395 496 152 314 9,817 6,522 4,435 5,424 3,250 2,063 2,633 1,284 1,014 Total 55,906 31,532 19,799 20,146 222,378 13 69 86 222 963 945 216 865 4,019 4,516 2,533 Longline 1996-1997 100 271 426 268 193 149 752 309 496 152 314 8,872 6,522 4,366 5,424 3,034 2,063 1,284 55,684 31,519 18,836 15,630 Gillnet 218,359 711 113 254 445 276 891 383 494 9,750 8,578 4,301 4,396 4,994 2,016 3,494 2,043 1,883 2,101 Total 46,666 28,393 20,106 209,284 71 92 96 15 50 367 120 236 1,170 2,845 Longline 1995-1996 113 254 430 276 891 147 661 494 6,905 8,486 4,301 4,300 4,994 1,896 3,494 2,043 1,883 2,101 46,595 28,393 19,739 Gillnet 208,114 568 357 691 254 595 145 283 439 3,117 7,674 4,934 4,567 3,642 3,105 1,062 1,084 11,137 Total 46,818 30,745 21,002 13,817 222,844 96 25 511 697 871 700 474 3,870 2,564 7,433 Longline 1994-1995 568 357 384 180 254 121 145 283 439 3,117 6,384 7,674 4,934 4,567 2,771 3,105 1,062 46,722 30,720 18,438 10,440 Gillnet 218,974 (i) All regions 2. Teleosts Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Queen snapper Blue groper Dhufish Pink snapper Samsonfish Mulloway Red redfish snapper, Boarfish Baldchin groper Sweetlip Emperor sweetlip Leatherjacket Deep sea trevally Tuna Hapuku Trevally Spangled emperor tuna Yellowfin Cod Footballer Parrotfish Knifejaw

50 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 51 Appendix I cont. 6 4 4 0 11 98 92 90 84 73 60 43 37 37 26 10 312 252 243 222 175 33,214 196,554 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 84 60 43 18 10 970 15,352 0 0 0 6 4 0 0 11 91 92 90 73 19 37 16 10 310 252 243 222 175 32,244 181,202 18 19 12 28 364 332 434 431 108 216 1,032 51,348 210,330 18 108 216 1,344 18,383 19 12 28 364 332 434 431 1,032 50,004 191,947 1 98 90 76 311 529 220 131 409 314 37,197 225,271 1 90 24 314 3,148 29,960 98 52 311 529 220 131 409 34,049 195,311 4 5 1 58 77 51 16 22 63 54 18 254 151 147 26,418 194,431 4 11 18 327 10,788 5 1 58 77 51 16 22 63 54 243 151 147 26,091 183,643 5 1 72 10 61 18 153 322 186 389 221 101 25,613 169,440 30 3,922 5 1 72 10 61 18 153 322 186 389 221 101 25,583 165,518 94 31 22 75 63 21 29 28 18 259 237 228 238 124 300 25,493 183,296 14 21 300 13,706 94 17 22 75 63 29 28 18 259 237 228 238 124 25,493 169,590 Sweep Mackerel, general Black kingfish (cobia) Groper Bonito kingfish Yellowtail Morwong Australian salmon Rosy jobfish Spanish mackerel Northwest snapper Bream Bigeye tuna Gurnard Coral trout Grey banded cod Buffalo bream John Dory Skipjack or striped tuna Red emperor Unspecified scalefish scalefish Total

50 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 51 Appendix I cont. 3 2 1 0 72 35 622 107 3,938 2,020 1,598 1,572 1,020 1,437 Total 31,011 12,428 1 9 10 19 Longline Annual mean 3 2 1 0 72 35 622 107 1,011 3,938 2,020 1,589 1,572 1,437 31,009 12,409 Gillnet 49 43 523 274 5,494 3,062 1,524 1,983 4,944 Total 34,022 17,896 3 49 45 94 Longline 1998-1999 43 523 274 5,494 3,062 1,524 1,938 4,944 34,013 17,802 Gillnet 19 15 870 253 4,466 2,025 2,234 2,256 1,718 1,006 Total 37,044 14,862

Longline 1997-1998 19 15 870 253 4,466 2,025 2,234 2,256 1,718 1,006 37,044 14,862 Gillnet 584 4,208 2,418 3,360 1,249 1,105 1,020 Total 24,030 13,944

Longline 1996-1997 584 4,208 2,418 3,360 1,249 1,105 1,020 24,030 13,944 Gillnet 7 9 967 134 712 120 186 3,032 1,401 1,499 8,067 Total 27,687

Longline 1995-1996 7 9 967 134 712 120 186 3,032 1,401 1,499 8,067 27,687 Gillnet 3 8 6 1 28 850 158 421 238 105 2,490 1,196 1,865 7,369 Total 32,272

Longline 1994-1995 3 8 6 1 28 850 158 421 238 105 2,490 1,196 1,865 7,369 32,272 Gillnet (ii) Region 1 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Queen snapper Blue groper Mulloway Red redfish snapper, Pink snapper Boarfish general Trevally, Morwong Samsonfish Hapuku Leatherjacket Sweep Knifejaw Unspecified scalefish scalefish Total

52 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 53 Appendix I cont. 4 2 11 65 49 31 31 29 21 20 18 405 398 372 153 9,453 4,430 1,397 1,237 1,518 19,645 Total 30,363.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 18 490 508 Longline Annual mean 0 4 2 11 65 49 31 31 29 21 20 405 398 372 153 9,453 4,430 1,397 1,237 1,028 30,323 19,137 Gillnet 11 12 91 53 19 564 329 215 1,112 9,338 4,578 1,674 Total 28,563 17,996

Longline 1998-1999 11 12 91 53 19 564 329 215 1,112 9,338 4,578 1,674 28,563 17,996 Gillnet 88 71 74 50 96 90 184 313 9,916 3,458 1,045 1,261 4,222 Total 25,067 20,868 68 90 2,450 2,540 Longline 1997-1998 88 71 74 50 96 184 313 9,916 3,458 1,045 1,261 1,772 24,864 18,328 Gillnet 5 44 57 63 10 917 168 909 218 5,011 1,650 1,855 Total 11,710 37,769 22,617

Longline 1996-1997 5 44 57 63 10 917 168 909 218 5,011 1,650 1,855 11,710 37,769 22,617 Gillnet 7 25 57 47 57 80 998 101 8,574 4,488 1,709 1,147 1,327 1,246 Total 32,811 19,863

Longline 1995-1996 7 25 57 47 57 80 998 101 8,574 4,488 1,709 1,147 1,327 1,246 32,811 19,863 Gillnet 1 83 22 53 677 406 245 262 138 7,725 4,615 1,470 1,186 Total 27,608 16,883

Longline 1994-1995 1 83 22 53 677 406 245 262 138 7,725 4,615 1,470 1,186 Gillnet 27,608 16,883 (iii) Region 2 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Queen snapper Blue groper Boarfish Red redfish snapper, Deep sea trevally Pink snapper Hapuku Samsonfish Sweep general Trevally, Mulloway Cod Leatherjacket Knifejaw Morwong Bigeye tuna Groper Dhufish Gurnard Unspecified scalefish Scalefish Total

52 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 53 Appendix I cont. 9 6 4 4 2 2 59 42 35 117 899 756 396 275 249 243 196 147 138 9,723 4,453 2,428 1,877 1,240 3,027 17,102 43,428 Total 34,391.4 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 11 53 57 47 49 12 255 1,822 2,061 Longline Annual mean 9 6 4 0 2 2 59 42 35 117 850 756 396 275 238 241 196 147 135 9,723 2,630 2,428 1,820 1,193 3,016 33,628 17,049 41,368 Gillnet 46 64 18 18 859 856 547 534 152 245 979 282 293 210 6,841 2,471 3,292 4,029 Total 26,573 14,848 10,725 47,309 3 8 43 98 89 18 202 125 2,617 3,001 Longline 1998-1999 46 64 18 770 731 547 534 152 237 979 282 293 210 4,224 2,471 3,194 4,029 25,968 14,805 10,722 44,308 Gillnet 70 24 59 112 840 958 564 285 378 159 9,306 5,881 2,435 1,909 2,897 Total 32,584 16,820 42,697 5 50 48 31 44 31 676 2049 1,840 Longline 1997-1998 70 24 59 112 809 914 564 285 373 159 9,306 4,041 2,435 1,861 2,866 30,555 16,770 40,648 Gillnet 1 9 50 61 53 16 748 686 103 397 304 129 8,494 5,503 2,805 1,643 1,172 2,475 Total 36,023 19,886 44,535 58 38 41 199 105 2,493 2,735 Longline 1996-1997 1 9 50 61 53 16 710 686 103 397 304 129 8,494 3,010 2,805 1,585 1,131 2,475 35,425 19,781 41,800 Gillnet 36 64 61 18 707 594 885 774 423 307 177 8,690 3,352 2,253 1,377 1,595 3,355 Total 32,842 16,305 40,973 67 82 79 36 50 15 27 190 2,162 2,518 Longline 1995-1996 36 64 61 18 671 594 885 774 373 307 162 8,690 1,190 2,253 1,295 1,516 3,328 32,271 16,238 38,455 Gillnet 2 5 8 63 29 28 112 118 687 801 347 289 477 341 2,178 1,166 2,158 1,387 2,381 Total 11,401 43,936 17,649 41,627

6 Longline 1994-1995 2 5 8 63 29 28 112 118 687 801 347 289 477 341 2,178 1,166 2,158 1,387 2,381 11,401 43,918 17,649 41,627 Gillnet (iv) Region 3 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Queen snapper Blue groper Pink snapper Boarfish Red redfish snapper, Samsonfish Dhufish Leatherjacket Deep sea trevally Hapuku Footballer Knifejaw Groper Mulloway general Trevally, Sweep Mackerel, general Bonito Gurnard Grey banded cod Buffalo bream Australian salmon Kingfish Yellowtail John Dory Parrotfish Unspecified scalefish scalefish Total

54 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 55 Appendix I cont. 3 1 97 79 45 32 30 30 26 466 443 230 126 9,350 8,378 6,183 2,209 2,128 15,042 44,897 Total 44,845.8 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 53 37 34 254 106 121 561 Longline Annual mean 5 3 1 97 79 45 32 30 28 26 466 440 230 9,313 8,375 5,929 2,175 2,022 44,686 15,041 44,336 Gillnet 6 78 25 18 176 8,224 9,553 5,175 1,858 2,036 Total 50,470 24,627 51,776 3 8 17 47 58 Longline 1998-1999 6 78 25 18 176 1,811 8,224 9,553 5,172 2,028 50,420 24,627 51,718 Gillnet 5 63 85 24 63 34 692 176 8,614 7,063 4,988 1,293 2,284 Total 42,128 14,078 39,462 36 12 24 65 28 24 153 Longline 1997-1998 5 63 85 63 34 692 176 8,614 7,051 4,964 1,228 2,256 42,020 14,078 39,309 Gillnet 5 55 57 28 55 14 353 343 461 236 9,385 6,401 2,847 2,744 Total 11,548 11,606 45,643 46,138 8 2 11 45 31 111 119 204 486 Longline 1996-1997 5 24 57 28 44 14 353 341 461 236 9,385 6,197 2,839 2,625 11,437 11,606 45,509 45,652 Gillnet 7 0 0 0 66 81 20 572 482 236 227 104 151 9,460 8,074 6,702 2,259 1,853 1,759 Total 42,451 12,280 44,333 4 3 80 13 14 281 233 236 784 Longline 1995-1996 7 66 81 20 558 482 227 104 151 9,456 8,074 6,421 2,246 1,620 1,759 42,211 12,277 43,549 Gillnet 0 4 78 71 59 53 40 113 431 120 314 8,903 7,813 7,648 2,789 1,725 Total 43,537 12,617 42,778 3 89 69 38 759 142 314 1,325 Longline 1994-1995 4 78 71 56 53 40 113 431 120 8,834 7,813 6,889 2,751 1,583 Gillnet 43,271 12,617 41,453 (v) Region 4 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Queen snapper Blue groper Dhufish Samsonfish Pink snapper Mulloway Red redfish snapper, Leatherjacket Cod Footballer Boarfish Baldchin groper Tuna general Trevally, Sweep Knifejaw Black kingfish (cobia) kingfish Yellowtail Unspecified scalefish scalefish Total

54 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 55 Appendix I cont. 8 2 11 11 95 87 86 80 70 68 36 32 28 24 19 15 14 12 119 877 409 262 259 247 8,776 8,308 4,981 4,759 4,468 2,447 1,778 10,051 48,439 Total 47,296.4 3 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 42 114 447 215 703 877 923 2,938 Longline Annual mean 8 2 11 11 77 95 87 86 80 63 68 36 32 28 24 19 15 14 12 876 409 262 214 247 8,562 7,605 4,104 4,757 3,545 2,444 1,773 9,937 45,957 45,501 Gillnet 11 71 70 68 25 14 24 12 59 112 425 182 295 129 220 340 6,041 3,941 4,667 2,042 5,239 1,976 1,625 Total 11,061 33,146 38,649 9 9 16 24 41 66 38 118 440 383 1,300 1,478 3,804 Longline 1998-1999 11 88 46 71 70 30 25 14 24 12 59 416 182 295 220 340 5,601 3,932 3,367 2,042 3,761 1,960 1,601 32,793 10,678 34,845 Gillnet 5 38 25 71 14 10 43 115 147 263 185 151 123 409 2,119 1,411 9,329 4,928 7,182 3,742 1,236 Total 11,540 11,853 55,223 10,316 65,255 629 174 141 169 1,771 3,273 2,900 2,978 10,264 Longline 1997-1998 5 89 10 38 25 71 14 10 43 115 147 185 123 409 2,119 1,411 9,687 8,267 6,429 4,928 4,204 3,742 1,236 11,684 49,910 54,991 Gillnet 7 5 42 53 22 77 54 116 137 382 691 283 149 203 145 8,451 8,550 3,198 5,886 5,017 2,205 2,134 8,391 Total 49,410 46,198 4 9 2 13 17 344 232 185 160 622 Longline 1996-1997 7 5 42 53 22 77 54 116 137 382 691 274 149 201 145 8,447 8,318 3,013 5,873 4,857 2,205 2,134 8,374 48,378 45,576 Gillnet 5 1 90 48 60 61 18 63 10 115 531 960 126 333 254 389 100 9,169 9,416 3,359 5,574 2,537 1,312 8,546 Total 51,473 43,077

Longline 1995-1996 , 5 1 90 48 60 61 18 63 10 115 531 960 126 333 254 389 100 9,169 9,416 3,359 5,574 2,537 1,312 8,546 51,473 43,077 Gillnet 62 39 94 66 17 13 59 54 34 14 75 53 38 10 118 286 427 143 9,905 8,091 4,350 5,366 2,367 3,781 1,698 1,454 Total 47,230 10,404 49,018

Longline 1994-1995 62 39 94 66 17 13 59 54 34 14 75 53 38 10 118 286 427 143 9,905 8,091 4,350 5,366 2,367 3,781 1,698 1,454 Gillnet 47,230 10,404 49,018 (vi) Region 5 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Queen snapper Dhufish Samsonfish Blue groper Pink snapper Mulloway Baldchin groper Leatherjacket other Tuna, tuna Yellowfin Red redfish snapper, Boarfish Cod Bonito Sweep Australian salmon kingfish Yellowtail Footballer Sweetlip Mackerel, general Spanish mackerel general Trevally, Knifejaw Bigeye tuna Groper Black kingfish (cobia) Grey banded cod Parrotfish Southern bluefin tuna Deep sea trevally John Dory Unspecified scalefish Total

56 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 57 Appendix I cont. 6 4 0 11 84 60 43 41 38 26 13 12 491 382 329 315 280 227 223 158 152 142 6,962 5,082 3,162 2,449 2,224 1,420 1,254 2,139 Total 27,726 33,209.6 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 48 80 84 60 43 10 394 370 151 354 1,173 3,190 1,353 1,120 1,989 9,265 Longline Annual mean 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 11 61 41 38 16 10 12 235 859 121 375 329 309 280 227 223 158 3,772 3,729 2,042 2,401 1,420 1,785 29,692 18,461 Gillnet 5 20 14 16 58 28 34 29 303 795 414 375 108 216 150 8,365 5,004 2,533 1,707 5,540 2,178 1,309 1,031 6,472 Total 36,152 36,704 26 20 16 20 627 301 108 216 961 1,198 2,929 1,031 5,171 11,426 Longline 1998-1999 5 14 38 28 34 29 369 303 795 414 375 150 5,511 5,436 3,973 1,906 1,681 2,178 1,008 1,031 Gillnet 32,557 25,278 1 11 76 84 39 27 16 76 453 749 406 525 301 195 272 314 8,986 7,525 1,875 2,945 1,499 1,359 3,141 Total 50,111 11,252 42,127 8 2 1 39 24 215 467 453 168 314 498 2,597 3,535 3,393 3,598 2,239 14,954 Longline 1997-1998 11 76 84 27 16 52 706 892 741 404 525 301 195 104 7,717 5,593 3,927 1,660 1,499 2,643 Gillnet 42,320 27,173 2 4 16 44 61 98 51 22 18 541 338 143 103 137 1,116 4,868 3,676 2,980 2,063 2,633 1,014 1,071 Total 29,503 20,999 2 4 53 18 752 486 714 216 865 310 1,744 2,533 6,945 Longline 1996-1997 2 16 44 61 98 84 51 22 100 541 900 149 338 143 101 761 3,124 3,190 2,266 2,063 Gillnet 27,248 14,054 9 47 24 113 476 600 276 166 126 186 776 304 101 1,849 3,281 1,299 3,494 Total 22,020 13,127 50 120 450 120 620 Longline 1995-1996 9 47 24 113 476 480 276 166 126 186 776 304 101 1,399 3,231 1,299 3,494 Gillnet 21,660 12,507 70 21 14 29 10 10 691 354 283 146 397 228 192 178 706 241 300 8,474 4,462 1,473 3,105 2,405 1,885 Total 28,262 25,674 25 27 21 14 511 659 868 700 160 300 1,196 7,291 1,805 12,381 Longline 1994-1995 6 81 70 29 10 10 119 814 180 329 283 397 228 192 178 1,183 2,657 3,105 2,405 1,017 Gillnet 24,675 13,293 (vii) Region 6 Gillnet equivalent Effort (km gn.hr) Catch (kg live weight) Pink snapper Dhufish Samsonfish Sweetlip Emperor sweetlip Mulloway Baldchin groper Spangled emperor Blue groper Parrotfish Queen snapper other Tuna, Black kingfish (cobia) tuna Yellowfin Mackerel, general general Trevally, Cod Rosy jobfish Northwest snapper Bream, mixed Spanish mackerel Bonito Coral trout kingfish Yellowtail Sweep Leatherjacket Red redfish snapper, Skipjack or striped tuna Red emperor Unspecified scalefish scalefish Total

56 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 57 Appendix II. Total length – fork length relationships

TL(cm) = a*FL(cm) + b FL (cm) Common name Species a b r2 n min max

Angel shark (unspecified) Family Squatinidae 1.0039 5.4232 0.9894 4 72 92 Dusky shark ( ) Carcharhinus obscurus 1.1762 3.6568 0.9838 1,196 66 264 Dusky shark ( ) “ “ 1.2073 1.3613 0.9859 1,157 59 347 Dusky shark (combined) “ “ 1.1851 3.0321 0.9844 2,359 59 282 Copper shark Carcharhinus brachyurus 1.2206 5.3633 0.9963 20 74 229 School shark Galeorhinus galeus 1.1385 3.3111 0.9800 748 80 151 Gummy shark Mustelus antarcticus 1.0837 4.6424 0.9590 360 63 185 Grey nurse Carcharias taurus 1.185x 10.669 0.9671 9 93 127 Smooth hammerhead Sphyrna zygaena 1.2977 1.7551 0.9846 135 52 142 Spinner shark Carcharhinus brevipinna 1.2026 2.8155 0.9945 61 67 132 Port Jackson Heterodontus portusjacksoni 1.0666 2.5650 0.9760 73 39 95 Pencil shark Hypogaleus hyugaensis 0.8159 31.212 0.3613 25 87 98 Tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier 1.0748 23.452 0.9476 225 95 361 Sandbar shark Carcharhinus plumbeus 1.2185 0.2133 0.9631 273 52 121 Whiskery shark Furgaleus macki 1.0044 13.171 0.8955 502 92 129 Western wobbegong Orectolobus sp. 0.8148 61.044 0.5316 74 44 122

58 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 59 Appendix III cont. A. (Last and Carcharias Carcharias Mustelus antarcticus Squatina tergocellata Orectolobus sp Squalus acanthias S. zygaena Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, for Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Cliff Cliff and Dudley (1992) Cliff and Dudley (1992) (1991) for Torres Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries for WA, male Bransetter and Musick (1994) for taurus Source Bridge et al. (1999) for Chidlow (2003) Kohler et al. (1995) Bransetter and Musick (1994) for taurus Chidlow (2003) for Stevens, 1994) < 80 40 -126 40 –126 68 - 176 81 - 240 52 - 288 47 - 143 39 – 164 102 - 122 145 - 250 Size (cm) 46.5 - 108 69 93 69 16 69 81 n 136 661 178 945 770 351 136 134 4,529 2 r 0.89 0.96 0.89 0.926 0.904 0.948 0.287 0.964 0.926 0.641 0.9385 0.9972 0.9973 0.9521 0.9486 b , where L equals length (cm) b 3.11 3.14 3.22 3.15 3.16 3.15 3.23 3.113 3.113 3.423 2.721 2.612 3.900 3.100 1.767 3.1313 -6 -3 -5 -5 -7 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -7 a 2.76x10 7.49 x10 6.71 x10 1.47 x10 1.62 x10 1.62 x10 2.19 x10 1.619x10 2.286x10 1.630x10 3.469x10 2.353x10 3.645 x10 3.1841 x10 Weight Weight (kg) = a*L 2.353x10 6.098x10 L TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL FL TL TL PCL PCL

sp. spp. spp. Mustelus antarcticus Sphyrna Hypogaleus hyugaensis Heterodontus portusjacksoni Carcharhinus brachyurus Squalus Carcharhinus obscurus Mustelus Carcharias taurus Species Family Squatinidae Orectolobus ornatus Prionace glauca Notorynchus cepedianus Sutorectus tentaculatus Length - Relationships Weight ) ) ) ) Gummy shark ( Common name Angel shark (unspecified) Banded wobbegong Broadnose sevengill Cobbler wobbegong Copper shark ( Dogfish, Dusky shark Grey gummy Grey nurse shark Gummy shark ( Hammerhead (unspecified) Pencil shark Port Jackson shark Copper shark ( Appendix III. 1. Elasmobranchs

58 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 59 Appendix III cont. .A (Last .A and Aptychotrema rostrata Alopias vulpinus Pristiophorus sp O. ornatus O. ornatus Kohler et al. (1995) Graham (1999) for Stevens, 1994) Kohler et al. (1995) Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Kohler et al. (1995) Graham, K.J. (1999) for Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Stevens and McLoughlin (1991) Chidlow (2003) for Kohler et al. (1995) for Stevens and McLoughlin (1991) Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Shark Research Section, Fisheries WA Kohler et al. (1995) Chidlow (2003) for 36 - 116 44 - 201 79 - 243 65 - 338 21 - 103 68 - 176 47 - 143 117 - 158 117 - 493 112 145 - 250 154 - 262 104 - 145 145 - 250 81 69 35 16 88 86 81 16 323 390 200 479 125 1,548 2,081 0.807 0.948 0.988 0.641 0.993 0.770 0.641 0.9385 0.9745 0.9255 0.9587 0.9812 0.8795 0.9486 0.9802 3.33 3.57 3.23 3.190 2.721 1.767 3.081 1.767 3.0124 3.4617 3.0669 3.1407 3.2097 2.5188 3.0848 -5 -6 -4 -6 -6 -3 -3 -6 -5 -6 -6 -6 -6 -7 -6 2.0 x10 1.3 x10 2.75x10 1.13 x10 2.62 x10 2.19 x10 2.186x10 1.619x10 7.745 x10 3.645 x10 3.645 x10 1.0885 x10 5.2432 x10 1.8821 x10 7.5763 x10 FL TL FL TL FL TL TL TL TL FL TL TL TL FL TL A. Orectolobus Alopiidae

Carcharhinus plumbeus Family Pristiophoridae Sphyrna lewini Galeorhinus galeus Isurus oxyrinchus Families Rhinobatidae and Rhynchobatidae Sphyrna zygaena Carcharhinus brevipinna maculatus Family Galeocerdo cuvier Orectolobus sp (Last and Stevens) Furgaleus macki Carcharodon carcharias Family Orectolobidae Sandbar (thickskin) shark Sawshark (unspecified) Scalloped hammerhead School (tope) shark Shortfin mako Shovelnose/fiddler ray (unspecified) Smooth hammerhead Spinner (longnose grey) shark Thresher shark (unspecified) shark Tiger Western wobbegong Whiskery shark White shark (white pointer) Wobbegong (unspecified)

60 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 61 Appendix III cont. Lactophrys Sarda chiliensis Pseudorhombus Scomber australasicus Scorpis lineolatus Kyphosus sydneyanus Scorpaena papillosus Scorpis lineolatus Scorpis lineolatus Epinephelus bleekeri Epinephelus bleekeri Zeus faber Meuschenia scaber

Source Steffe Steffe et al. (1996) Unpublished data, Recreational Fishing Section, Fisheries WA & Willis (1998) Taylor for Unpublished data, Recreational Fishing Section, Fisheries WA Magnusson and Magnusson (1987) Campbell & Collins (1975) for Claro and Garcia-Arteaga, (1994) for quadricornis (1994) for Yanagawa & Willis (1998) Taylor for Unpublished data, Estuarine Section, Fisheries WA (1994) for Yanagawa Graham (1999) for Unpublished data, Estuarine Section, Fisheries WA Willing and Pender (1989) for arsius & Willis (1998) Taylor for & Willis (1998) Taylor for Graham (1999) for Al Sakaff and Esseen for & Willis (1998) Taylor for (1991) Torres <200.0 3.6-18.0 5.0-32.0 8.5-25.0 2.3-19.6 3.6-18.0 8.0-32.0 3.6-18.0 29.0-77.0 14.2-26.9 25.0-57.5 14.2-26.9 10.0-53.0 13.3-35.6 5.0 - 20.0 Size (cm) 4.0 – 77.0 n 11 11 46 32 90 82 46 88 46 n/a 219 181 225 460 8,232 2,824 2 r n/a 0.99 0.993 0.988 0.955 0.988 0.986 0.995 0.993 0.979 0.993 0.9613 0.9773 b 3.2 , where L equals length (cm) 2.95 2.25 2.33 2.76 3.111 b 3.139 3.136 2.995 3.090 3.126 3.055 3.126 3.313 3.076 3.137 3.136 3.247 3.136 2.8153 -6 -6 -5 -6 -6 -6 -6 -5 -5 -5 -6 -5 -5 -5 -5 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 a 1.3 x10 8.9 x10 8.9 x10 5.6 x10 6.8 x10 5.0 x10 7.45 x10 2.28 x10 3.92 x10 1.53 x10 1.56 x10 9.22 x10 3.09 x10 3.01 x10 7.626 x10 7.627 x10 2.261 x10 9.135 x10 7.626 x10 7.626 x10 Weight Weight (kg) = a*L L TL TL TL TL TL FL TL TL FL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL TL Species Arripis truttaceus Choerodon rubescens Scorpis georgianus Achoerodus gouldii Family Pentacerotidae Sarda australis Family Ostraciidae Epinephelides armatus Kyphosus cornelii Cnidoglanis macrocephalus Plectropomus leopardus Family Zeidae Family Platycephalidae Families Bothidae & Pleuronectidae Neosebastes spp. Oplegnathus woodwardi Family Monacanthidae Family Scombridae Tilodon sexfasciatum Argyrosomus hololepidotus Common name Australian salmon Baldchin groper Banded sweep Blue groper Boarfish (unspecified) Bonito Boxfish (unspecified) Breaksea cod Buffalo bream Cobbler, Coral trout Dory (unspecified) Flathead Flounder (unspecified) Gurnard perch Knifejaw Leatherjacket (unspecified) Mackerel (unspecified) Moonlighter Mulloway 2. Teleosts

60 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 61 Appendix III cont.

Scarus Uranoscopus Nemadactylus douglasii Cheilodactylus spectabilis Seriola lalandi Aplodactylus arctidens Scorpis lineolatus Pseudocaranx dentex M. Mackie, Fisheries Unpublished W.A. data Letourneur et al. (1998) Garcia-Arteaga et al. (1997) for chrysopterum Moran and Burton (1990) & Willis (1998) Taylor for Graham (1999) & Willis (1998) Taylor for & Willis (1998) Taylor for Pauly et al. (1996) & Willis (1998) Taylor for & Willis (1998) Taylor for Steffe et al. (1996) Al Sakaff and Esseen (1999) Dulcic and Kralijevic (1996) for scaber Graham (1999) Letourneur et al. (1998) Unpublished data, Recreational Fishing Section, Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Recreational Fishing Section, for Fisheries WA Unpublished data, Recreational Fishing Section, Fisheries WA Steffe et al. (1996) & Willis (1998) Taylor 9.0-71.5 7.0-31.0 4.0-34.0 3.6-18.0 4.0-34.0 11.6-55.8 45.1-65.0 10.0-84.0 19.4-52.0 23.0-73.5 15.2-34.1 6.5 – 82.0 7.0 – 38.0 30.0-166.0 30.0-168.0 30.0-166.0 22.5 – 52.0 7 67 46 97 36 19 275 187 140 100 120 187 196 100s 100s 1,238 2,646 0.99 0.94 0.996 0.987 0.993 0.972 0.993 0.984 0.987 0.963 0.968 0.9847 0.9926 0.9926 3.1 2.904 2.781 2.989 2.845 3.131 3.207 3.136 3.012 2.619 3.004 2.761 2.714 2.837 3.086 2.845 2.9092 3.1375 2.6905 2.6905 2.6748 -5 -6 -5 -5 -6 -6 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -6 -6 -5 1.0 x10 7.7 x10 7.0 x10 4.0 x10 3.96x10 1.94 x10 1.35 x10 6.99 x10 9.50 x10 6.99 x10 5.15 x10 4.83 x10 3.808 x10 1.600 x10 3.515 x10 5.260 x10 7.626 x10 1.264 x10 1.391 x10 3.515 x10 4.67727 x10 FL FL FL FL TL FL TL FL TL TL TL TL TL TL FL TL TL TL TL FL TL spp. Uranoscopidae

Scomberomorus commerson Lagocephalus scleratus Family Scaridae Pagrus auratus Nemadactylus valenciennesi Centroberyx Cheilodactylus rubrolabiatus Seriola hippos Diagramma pictum Aplodactylidae Family Scorpis aequipinnis Aulopus purpurissatus Thunnus maccoyii Lethrinus nebulosus Family Centroberyx lineatus Family Haemulidae Pomatomus saltatrix Family Scombridae Glaucosoma hebraicum Thunnus albacares Seriola lalandi Narrow-barred spanish mackerel North west blowfish Parrotfish (unspecified) Pink snapper Queen snapper Redfish, red snapper, nannygai, bight redfish Red-lipped morwong Samsonfish Sand snapper (Painted sweetlips) Sea carp, cale Sea sweep Sergeant baker Southern blue-fin tuna Spangled emperor Stargazer (unspecified) Swallowtail Sweetlip Tailor Trevally Australian dhufish West fin tuna Yellow tailed kingfish Yellow

62 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 63 Appendix IV. Size frequency statistics

1. Elasmobranch

Mean Standard Fork Length (cm)

Name Species Sex Location n ( ) Dev. (σ) min. max.

Male 76 60 238 Copper shark Carcharhinus brachyurus all regions 155 50 Female 40 140 57 65 245 Male 771 58 210 Spinner shark Carcharhinus brevipinna all regions 91 19 Female 691 90 16 60 220 Male 162 72 183 Dusky shark Carcharhinus obscurus region 1 94 19 Female 143 91 15 68 163 Male 56 90 14 75 143 “ “ region 2 Female 48 90 14 74 149 Male 1,009 87 17 53 210 “ “ region 3 Female 995 87 20 59 224 Male 5,442 79 11 64 253 “ “ region 4 Female 5,458 79 12 65 205 Male 1,482 83 14 67 219 “ “ region 5 Female 1,730 84 16 67 273 Male 300 92 22 74 196 “ “ region 6 Female 366 90 24 72 222 Male 8,455 82 14 53 253 “ “ all regions Female 8,740 82 15 59 273 Sandbar shark Carcharhinus plumbeus Male region 3 319 77 7 52 98 Female 247 79 10 54 150 Male 617 75 12 47 140 “ “ region 4 Female 733 75 13 46 156 Male 740 82 11 52 147 “ “ region 5 Female 742 82 12 52 155 Male 222 95 18 45 143 “ “ region 6 Female 269 101 23 44 160 Male 1,898 81 13 45 147 “ “ all regions Female 1,991 82 16 44 160 Tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier Male all regions 17 125 34 92 204 Female 38 139 32 92 214 Whiskery Furgaleus macki Male region 1 82 121 5 109 132 shark Female 62 108 6 91 123 Male 22 120 4 114 131 “ “ region 2 Female 30 111 6 100 126 Male 118 112 7 95 127 “ “ region 3 Female 374 110 5 88 128 Male 593 110 8 76 128 “ “ region 4 Female 1,632 109 8 75 150 Male 242 111 8 80 128 “ “ region 5 Female 674 115 7 84 130 Male 76 110 8 72 123 “ “ region 6 Female 93 107 6 90 122 Male 1,133 111 8 72 132 “ “ all regions Female 2,865 110 8 75 150 School shark Galeorhinus galeus Male all regions 134 111 11 80 140 Female 756 119 10 80 151

62 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 63 Pencil shark Hypogaleus hyugaensis Male all regions 242 92 4 74 102 Female 251 92 5 63 105 860 87 121 Gummy shark Mustelus antarcticus Male region 1 102 6 Female 349 106 13 57 185 Male 224 101 6 84 115 “ “ region 2 Female 746 113 11 80 163 Male 228 98 5 84 119 “ “ region 3 Female 1,953 110 11 63 148 Male 42 97 6 86 117 “ “ region 4 Female 482 112 14 84 155 west coast Male 8 100 5 90 106 “ “ (regions 5 Female & 6) 123 113 13 88 190 Male 1,362 101 6 84 121 “ “ all regions Female 3,654 110 12 57 190 1 85 Grey gummy Mustelus sp. Male all regions Female 44 91 5 74 101 26 91.0 231.0 Grey nurse Carcharias taurus Male all regions 130 40 Female 18 132 40 86.0 222.0 Heterodontus 98 43 70 Port Jackson Male all regions 57 6 portusjacksoni Female 236 65 14 40 99 48 76 247 Mako Isurus oxyrinchus Male all regions 128 43 Female 31 139 45 80 300 279 14 260 Wobbegongs Family Orectolobidae Male all regions 142 48 Female 271 130 41 60 225 1,178 48 187 Hammerhead Sphyrna zygaena Male all regions 91 17 Female 1,092 93 18 48 232

2. Teleosts

Mean Standard fork length (cm) Name Species n ( ) Dev. (σ) min. max.

Australian salmon Arripis truttaceus 58 74 5 60 84 Baldchin groper Choerodon rubescens 211 56 4 48 67 Blue groper Achoerodus gouldii 895 65 9 35 109 Boarfish (unspecified) Family Pentacerotidae 638 49 12 18 94 West Australian dhufish Glaucosoma hebraicum 1,206 66 11 25 110 Knifejaw Oplegnathus woodwardi 351 43 5 26 94 Leatherjacket (unspecified) Family Monacanthidae 380 60 9 34 83 Moonlighter Tilodon sexfasciatum 160 42 16 29 123 Pink snapper Pagrus auratus 767 61 10 28 115 Queen snapper Nemadactylus valenciennesi 2,513 66 8 32 98 Redfish, red snapper, nannygai, bight redfish Centroberyx spp. 399 31 71 53 7 Samsonfish Seriola hippos 142 90 15 55 164

64 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 65 Appendix V cont. 52 89 64 61 823 797 683 617 527 424 218 192 138 121 108 107 150 (kg) 8,746 7,757 5,593 4,674 4,297 2,702 1,683 1,595 1,294 1,008 21,677 11,539 2 2 1 88 26 26 12 52 17 20 10 75 12 34 11 36 10 <1 415 672 488 330 311 323 104 108 Mean annual catch (no) 4,129 1,462 2,594 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 60 644 173 842 324 661 208 459 207 181 116 98/99 6,472 6,429 2,491 2,086 1,709 1,542 1,166 1,671 19,403 13,349 10,106 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 19 22 37 53 29 594 941 791 405 364 212 97/98 5,836 6,156 2,612 4,584 2,837 1,696 1,556 1,692 16,471 11,686 10,316 0 0 0 0 74 64 30 97 27 82 847 580 771 688 976 452 702 261 263 690 131 96/97 3,359 7,749 5,460 4,439 5,631 1,612 1,394 21,768 0 0 0 0 10 75 247 533 370 885 386 486 336 103 211 182 100 95/96 7,283 9,580 5,837 8,169 8,580 1,089 4,140 1,615 1,640 1,302 24,990 14,087 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 9 0 13 84 62 39 655 153 197 628 317 447 113 393 369 117 300 94/95 7,801 5,103 4,468 4,906 3,677 1,042 1,800 25,751 15,215 11,913 1 0 2 9 0 2 1 0 0 1 16 37 79 39 13 36 18 20 237 413 569 227 161 143 170 187 98/99 3,990 1,811 3,380 0 1 5 2 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 40 41 22 14 95 16 23 461 631 499 479 424 109 134 97/98 2,796 1,230 1,952 0 5 0 9 9 0 8 1 30 11 43 26 62 75 29 66 12 25 59 22 21 424 265 956 266 116 172 96/97 4,272 1,826 8 0 0 0 1 5 3 2 Observed Catch (no) 45 17 11 60 37 98 15 67 25 27 651 808 355 988 140 211 410 125 95/96 5,102 2,066 3,204 1 3 9 0 0 4 6 1 0 2 18 10 10 11 10 23 41 463 553 749 593 197 450 107 112 123 94/95 4,486 1,777 2,609 . sp Pristiophoridae Alopiidae (i) All regions (i) All regions Species Name Carcharhinus obscurus Mustelus antarcticus Furgaleus macki Heterodontus portusjacksoni Sphyrna zygaena Carcharhinus plumbeus Galeorhinus galeus Carcharhinus brevipinna Family Orectolobidae Carcharhinus brachyurus Family Myliobatididae Orectolobus ornatus Galeocerdo cuvier Orectolobus sp. Isurus oxyrinchus Family Squatinidae Orectolobus maculatus Hypogaleus hyugaensis Carcharias taurus Family Family Sphyrnidae Prionace glauca Families Rhinobatidae & Rhynchobatidae Sutorectus tentaculatus Family Dasyatididae Family Sphyrna lewini Mustelus Carcharodon carcharias Research Research Observed Catch, July 1994 – June 1999 Appendix V. Research Observed Catch, July 1994 – June 1999 (a) Elasmobranchs Common Name Dusky Shark Gummy Shark Whiskery Shark *Port Jackson Shark Smooth Hammerhead Sandbar Shark School Shark Longnose Grey/Spinner Shark Wobbegong (unspecified) Copper Shark *Eagle Ray Banded Wobbegong Tiger Shark Western Wobbegong Shortfin Mako *Angel Shark (unspecified) Spotted Wobbegong Pencil Shark Grey Nurse Shark *Saw Shark (unspecified) Hammerhead (unspecified) Blue Shark *Shovelnose/Fiddler Ray *Cobbler Wobbegong * (unspecified) Thresher Shark (unspecified) Scalloped Hammerhead Grey Gummy * White Shark Appendix V. Appendix V. (a) Elasmobranchs

64 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 65 Appendix V cont. 9 6 5 21 20 <1 77 36 32 29 29 13 954 864 402 361 237 131 107 (kg) 4,681 4,457 1,226 1,166 75,080 14,807 5 2 3 4 6 8 1 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mean annual catch 89 18 45 <1 <1 493 708 159 390 116 101 (no) 2,147 11,247 ------0 8 1 23 100 98/99 70,482 ------0 0 0 7 0 97/98 68,920 ------0 0 0 0 20 96/97 58,167 9 59 60 58 11 26 0 0 9 2 0 276 664 174 262 214 155 95/96 9,362 8,693 1,829 2,231 1,811 1,693 27,586 Observed catch (kg live wt.) 92,248 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 98 35 58 12 47 222 623 102 528 300 94/95 2,027 85,584 ------2 2 0 7 1 98/99 11,574 ------0 0 0 5 0 97/98 8,984 2 0 0 0 0 ------8,812 96/97 Observed catch (no) 0 0 1 4 0 2 6 8 2 7 1 1 69 34 90 10 15 986 212 746 218 174 14,486 95/96 1,371 3,952 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 10 44 34 13 106 132 342 94/95 12,378 Pristiophoridae Carcharhinus limbatus/tilstoni Family Mobulidae Notorynchus cepedianus Family Squalidae Family Scyliorhinidae Species Name Galeorhinus galeus Mustelus antarcticus Carcharhinus obscurus Heterodontus portusjacksoni Sphyrna zygaena Furgaleus macki Family Myliobatididae Carcharhinus brachyurus Carcharodon carcharias Family Orectolobus ornatus Family Orectolobidae Family Squatinidae Hypogaleus hyugaensis Orectolobus maculatus Families Rhinobatidae & Rhynchobatidae Carcharias taurus Notorynchus cepedianus 1 Region (ii) Blacktip (whaler) *Manta ray/devil ray *Broadnose Sevengill Dogfish (unspecified) *Catshark (unspecified) Total Common Name School Shark Gummy Shark Dusky Shark *Port Jackson Shark Smooth Hammerhead Whiskery Shark *Eagle Ray Copper Shark * White Shark *Saw Shark (unspecified) Banded Wobbegong Wobbegong (unspecified) *Angel Shark (unspecified) Pencil Shark Spotted Wobbegong *Shovelnose/Fiddler Ray Grey Nurse Shark *Broadnose Sevengill Total

66 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 67 Appendix V cont. 6 5 1 57 46 43 42 31 18 14 12 <1 871 712 448 244 240 226 100 (kg) 4,263 7,370 6 7 8 1 1 2 Mean annual catch 74 49 82 60 25 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 540 134 994 (no) 0 0 0 0 0 3 56 78 12 79 94 15 25 577 825 452 562 379 191 98/99 4,053 7,403 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 67 17 62 19 738 586 105 304 561 106 97/98 8,235 1,150 11,961 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 56 32 25 11 824 799 190 382 96/97 2,417 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 38 99 91 24 16 963 207 104 360 95/96 1,914 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 0 0 0 97 81 71 13 46 12 715 365 424 275 199 229 94/95 7,240 1,789 1,601 13,156 3 1 0 5 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 84 33 14 20 14 682 100 188 98/99 1,149 7 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 64 40 35 76 20 28 804 149 97/98 1,233 0 8 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 38 60 30 14 102 151 413 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 7 1 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 21 12 33 90 145 319 95/96 6 1 0 0 5 1 3 5 0 0 0 69 24 14 969 264 164 101 122 106 94/95 1,854 Pristiophoridae Species Name Mustelus antarcticus Carcharhinus obscurus Furgaleus macki Sphyrna zygaena Heterodontus portusjacksoni Family Myliobatididae Carcharhinus brachyurus Hypogaleus hyugaensis Carcharhinus brevipinna Carcharodon carcharias Family Squatinidae Orectolobus ornatus Isurus oxyrinchus Family Orectolobidae Galeorhinus galeus Orectolobus sp. Family Carcharias taurus Family Squalidae Family Dasyatididae 2 Region (iii) Common Name Gummy Shark Dusky Shark Whiskery Shark Smooth Hammerhead *Port Jackson Shark *Eagle Ray Copper Shark Pencil Shark Longnose Grey/Spinner Shark * White Shark *Angel Shark (unspecified) Banded Wobbegong Shortfin Mako Wobbegong (unspecified) School Shark Western Wobbegong *Saw Shark (unspecified) Grey Nurse Shark Dogfish (unspecified) *Stingray (unspecified) Total

66 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 67 Appendix V cont. 6 3 2 1 95 67 47 44 36 25 22 20 14 13 11 <1 868 656 374 312 121 (kg) 4,110 2,747 1,152 10,735 1 4 3 6 4 1 60 70 25 30 12 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mean annual catch 482 406 136 104 (no) 1,348 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 81 56 44 12 14 26 13 10 984 994 275 425 98/99 7,830 1,933 1,451 14,155 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 12 46 12 47 10 195 749 562 150 115 97/98 2,447 4,120 1,691 10,166 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 21 94 41 52 22 33 14 402 643 753 278 111 96/97 1,483 4,000 7,965 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 3 0 35 50 65 872 183 201 317 472 252 105 124 95/96 2,793 3,503 8,987 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 43 56 85 31 48 23 10 210 767 538 94/95 5,995 2,808 1,781 12,403 0 5 5 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 79 92 14 11 946 232 139 98/99 1,534 3 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 20 55 50 12 296 550 115 113 97/98 1,230 2 2 0 0 2 6 7 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 45 86 87 93 11 187 679 96/97 1,213 Observed Catch (no) 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 76 30 13 27 11 372 151 451 106 118 95/96 1,367 2 0 6 8 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 25 22 14 611 416 100 180 94/95 1,397 Alopiidae Pristiophoridae Species Name Mustelus antarcticus Carcharhinus obscurus Carcharhinus plumbeus Furgaleus macki Sphyrna zygaena Carcharhinus brevipinna Heterodontus portusjacksoni Family Myliobatididae Carcharhinus brachyurus Family Orectolobidae Hypogaleus hyugaensis Orectolobus sp. Family Squatinidae Family Galeocerdo cuvier Orectolobus maculatus Orectolobus ornatus Galeorhinus galeus Family Sutorectus tentaculatus Carcharias taurus Family Dasyatididae Families Rhinobatidae & Rhynchobatidae Family Scyliorhinidae 3 (iv) Region Region (iv) Common Name Gummy Shark Dusky Shark Sandbar Shark Whiskery Shark Smooth Hammerhead Longnose Grey/Spinner Shark *Port Jackson Shark *Eagle Ray Copper Shark Wobbegong (unspecified) Pencil Shark Western Wobbegong *Angel Shark (unspecified) Thresher Shark (unspecified) Tiger Shark Spotted Wobbegong Banded Wobbegong School Shark *Saw Shark (unspecified) *Cobbler Wobbegong Grey Nurse Shark *Stingray (unspecified) *Shovelnose/Fiddler Ray *Catshark (unspecified) Total

68 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 69 Appendix V cont. 9 4 98 61 51 37 23 20 19 839 700 639 535 466 392 302 249 226 220 130 111 106 (kg) 4,787 4,734 2,503 2,499 1,181 12,631 33,476 7 4 1 6 4 Mean annual catch 82 36 14 29 98 11 41 58 <1 <1 46 14 10 11 <1 <1 <1 570 297 238 124 (no) 2,716 1,583 6,002 0 8 12 60 28 23 42 46 683 680 496 298 511 535 229 207 455 154 116 100 98/99 3,897 8,477 2,774 4,575 1,442 1,681 1,040 16,239 44,807 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 53 28 11 449 742 884 358 292 208 223 203 97/98 7,827 7,178 4,237 1,845 2,919 1,727 1,227 1,164 31,576 0 9 0 3 0 0 9 0 0 15 97 196 213 615 810 456 152 171 167 133 870 175 96/97 3,358 2,969 4,339 1,244 1,042 11,544 28,585 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 1 52 10 43 31 198 236 524 109 128 162 95/96 3,705 3,528 3,352 2,280 1,373 1,564 17,210 34,517 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 0 0 0 9 84 31 13 29 54 98 33 208 394 672 192 157 166 125 116 122 94/95 5,795 4,461 1,479 1,600 1,725 10,333 27,896 0 6 8 1 2 8 1 2 2 1 7 24 44 86 36 15 19 14 462 289 446 181 177 124 138 185 98/99 3,580 2,835 8,693 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 43 11 19 74 10 49 54 13 16 22 904 297 258 173 221 97/98 1,533 1,417 5,118 8 7 1 0 4 4 9 4 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 14 11 22 27 38 27 34 385 993 421 133 132 96/97 2,477 4,756 Observed Catch (no) 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 16 78 59 24 16 32 24 20 427 451 204 131 95/96 3,984 1,180 6,660 9 3 2 6 0 0 5 8 3 5 5 0 0 0 9 28 28 92 48 28 31 13 11 671 147 135 94/95 2,006 1,492 4,785 Pristiophoridae Alopiidae Species Name Carcharhinus obscurus Furgaleus macki Heterodontus portusjacksoni Carcharhinus plumbeus Sphyrna zygaena Mustelus antarcticus Carcharhinus brevipinna Family Orectolobidae Carcharhinus brachyurus Orectolobus ornatus Orectolobus sp. Family Myliobatididae Orectolobus maculatus Family Squatinidae Hypogaleus hyugaensis Carcharodon carcharias Prionace glauca Family Isurus oxyrinchus Sutorectus tentaculatus Carcharias taurus Family Families Rhinobatidae & Rhynchobatidae Carcharhinus limbatus/tilstoni Family Mobulidae Family Dasyatididae Galeocerdo cuvier Family Squalidae 4 Region (v) Common Name Dusky Shark Whiskery Shark *Port Jackson Shark Sandbar Shark Smooth Hammerhead Gummy Shark Longnose Grey/Spinner Shark Wobbegong (unspecified) Copper Shark Banded Wobbegong Western Wobbegong *Eagle Ray Spotted Wobbegong *Angel Shark (unspecified) Pencil Shark * White Shark Blue Shark *Saw Shark (unspecified) Shortfin Mako *Cobbler Wobbegong Grey Nurse Shark Thresher Shark (unspecified) *Shovelnose/Fiddler Ray Blacktip (whaler) *Manta ray/devil ray *Stingray (unspecified) Tiger Shark Dogfish (unspecified) Total

68 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 69 Appendix V cont. 3 2 85 70 13 11 11 <1 735 546 441 376 364 362 275 274 166 159 103 (kg) 3,939 3,412 1,938 1,757 1,289 1,218 17,551 2 4 4 9 7 5 5 3 Mean annual catch 38 94 19 46 25 28 20 <1 <1 <1 <1 686 306 648 191 172 126 (no) 2,438 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 36 24 15 22 17 653 712 792 766 312 408 221 126 311 458 238 123 98/99 1,564 6,804 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 47 11 29 656 496 594 750 413 481 554 97/98 3,374 3,183 1,346 1,651 1,099 2,089 1,050 17,828 0 0 9 0 77 59 10 74 18 26 10 15 251 828 156 468 399 751 425 219 432 96/97 3,210 5,137 2,123 3,202 17,899 0 0 0 0 1 84 60 58 44 15 20 509 653 905 371 560 280 538 113 240 249 95/96 3,072 4,530 3,352 1,904 17,559 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 0 81 77 60 20 30 12 <1 216 600 163 321 111 121 333 215 94/95 9,388 3,500 2,075 2,655 4,131 1,860 1,693 27,662 0 1 2 9 1 8 0 2 4 5 0 1 1 2 0 0 78 59 91 44 37 33 40 15 265 698 98/99 0 4 9 5 4 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 27 81 87 564 291 450 179 186 229 124 97/98 2,264 4 1 3 4 3 7 6 0 5 4 0 1 0 46 76 19 29 37 18 19 682 494 710 330 117 96/97 2,615 Observed Catch (no) 4 5 5 0 0 8 9 2 8 5 0 0 2 57 85 86 98 70 19 15 20 38 543 403 95/96 1,121 2,603 1 2 3 0 5 3 5 1 3 0 0 1 86 55 17 23 11 281 694 296 500 201 150 111 94/95 1,561 4,010 Alopiidae Pristiophoridae Species Name Carcharhinus obscurus Carcharhinus plumbeus Heterodontus portusjacksoni Furgaleus macki Carcharhinus brevipinna Sphyrna zygaena Family Orectolobidae Isurus oxyrinchus Carcharhinus brachyurus Family Myliobatididae Galeocerdo cuvier Orectolobus ornatus Orectolobus sp. Family Squatinidae Orectolobus maculatus Mustelus antarcticus Carcharias taurus Family Dasyatididae Families Rhinobatidae & Rhynchobatidae Family Family Hypogaleus hyugaensis Sutorectus tentaculatus Sphyrna lewini Family Squalidae 5 (vi) Region Region (vi) Common Name Dusky Shark Sandbar Shark *Port Jackson Shark Whiskery Shark Longnose Grey/Spinner Shark Smooth Hammerhead Wobbegong (unspecified) Shortfin Mako Copper Shark *Eagle Ray Tiger Shark Banded Wobbegong Western Wobbegong *Angel Shark (unspecified) Spotted Wobbegong Gummy Shark Grey Nurse Shark *Stingray (unspecified) *Shovelnose/Fiddler Ray Thresher Shark (unspecified) *Saw Shark (unspecified) Pencil Shark *Cobbler Wobbegong Scalloped Hammerhead Dogfish (unspecified) Total

70 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 71 Appendix V cont. 7 7 5 83 69 61 46 45 21 713 690 651 462 238 219 109 105 104 (kg) 3,425 1,665 8,226 4 1 1 2 1 2 1 Mean annual catch 13 20 13 57 43 12 11 35 16 12 <1 173 207 623 (no) ------98/99 ------97/98 0 0 0 0 4 0 82 74 46 30 20 884 690 356 371 290 122 96/97 1,371 2,216 1,232 7,787 0 0 0 54 65 62 33 16 764 536 986 202 265 179 182 250 206 100 95/96 4,071 1,969 9,943 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 46 38 26 811 492 184 141 103 260 94/95 4,831 6,949 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) ------98/99 ------97/98 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 52 21 59 41 53 15 21 18 283 576 96/97 0 3 4 4 3 2 4 0 1 12 36 36 14 32 18 27 17 186 205 123 727 95/96 Observed Catch (no) 7 0 2 6 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 39 87 280 133 566 94/95 . sp Species Name Carcharhinus plumbeus Carcharhinus obscurus Galeocerdo cuvier Family Sphyrnidae Sphyrna zygaena Furgaleus macki Carcharhinus brevipinna Family Orectolobidae Mustelus antarcticus Heterodontus portusjacksoni Sphyrna lewini Carcharhinus brachyurus Carcharias taurus Mustelus Hypogaleus hyugaensis Orectolobus maculatus Orectolobus ornatus Family Myliobatididae Carcharhinus limbatus/tilstoni Families Rhinobatidae & Rhynchobatidae 6 Region (vii) Common Name Sandbar Shark Dusky Shark Tiger Shark Hammerhead (unspecified) Smooth Hammerhead Whiskery Shark Longnose Grey/Spinner Shark Wobbegong (unspecified) Gummy Shark *Port Jackson Shark Scalloped Hammerhead Copper Shark Grey Nurse Shark Grey Gummy Pencil Shark Spotted Wobbegong Banded Wobbegong *Eagle Ray Blacktip (whaler) *Shovelnose/Fiddler Ray Total

70 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 71 Appendix V cont. 69 66 50 30 24 21 21 20 18 16 12 685 533 449 441 372 343 289 287 220 195 128 122 (kg) 2797 2330 1762 1495 1426 6 9 4 3 7 2 40 31 18 55 29 14 48 25 10 15 25 410 312 259 503 220 241 140 239 105 118 116 Mean annual catch (no) 2 0 0 10 44 70 24 70 62 27 41 <1 917 820 980 190 416 110 175 127 253 2440 3016 2126 1756 1548 1475 1347 98/99 0 0 5 0 60 79 32 58 25 15 30 38 13 444 312 719 279 385 370 310 182 312 129 1758 1291 1595 1227 1247 97/98 4 7 8 3 0 98 12 45 74 35 31 14 26 11 34 951 491 215 217 162 183 194 170 224 1267 1909 1056 1033 96/97 4 5 23 99 33 37 11 10 22 16 16 56 591 576 242 384 329 492 393 423 314 340 175 5901 2487 1963 1720 1623 95/96 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 5 9 0 8 0 6 72 53 12 33 17 19 425 763 249 346 794 253 426 149 179 190 187 2617 2947 2072 1820 1681 94/95 3 3 2 2 2 4 0 0 71 13 43 62 59 30 44 41 18 358 404 312 376 239 471 259 484 132 551 226 98/99 9 0 0 5 5 6 8 0 19 29 13 17 43 14 45 49 10 25 258 174 234 478 197 158 215 142 115 126 97/98 8 5 2 7 3 3 4 7 5 5 1 0 60 10 62 16 45 50 75 46 14 186 255 155 419 166 182 114 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 9 7 3 2 4 3 1 9 52 72 31 19 24 79 51 38 14 22 866 349 288 750 231 225 247 142 106 106 95/96 2 5 2 7 0 6 0 5 1 48 93 71 73 28 37 16 49 41 36 10 21 384 379 304 490 268 167 207 94/95 Species Name Kyphosus cornelii Glaucosoma hebraicum Dactylophora nigricans Nemadactylus valenciennesi Achoerodus gouldii Pagrus auratus Seriola hippos Centroberyx spp. Family Pentacerotidae Argyrosomus hololepidotus Family Monacanthidae Family Scombridae Seriola lalandi Choerodon rubescens Thunnus albacares Diagramma pictum Oplegnathus woodwardi Arripis truttaceus Tilodon sexfasciatum Family Scaridae Scorpis aequipinnis Thunnus maccoyii Sarda australis Family Zeidae Scorpis georgianus Scomberomorus commerson Family Lethrinus nebulosus regions Research Observed Scalefish Catch, July 1994 – June 1999 All (i) Common Name *Buffalo Bream West Australian Dhufish *Dusky Morwong Queen Snapper Blue Groper Pink Snapper Samson Fish Red snapper, Redfish, Nannygai Boarfish (unspecified) Mulloway Leatherjacket (unspecified) Mackerel (unspecified) Yellow tailed kingfish Baldchin Groper Yellowfin Tuna Painted sweetlips, sand snapper Knife Jaw Australian Salmon Moonlighter Parrotfish (unspecified) Sea sweep Southern Blue-fin Tuna Bonito Dory (unspecified) Banded Sweep Spanish mackerel Trevally (unspecified) Spangled Emperor

72 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 73 Appendix V cont. 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 11 <1 <1 <1 <1 5 3 0 0 0 56 45 43 33 11 14252 733 140 122 (kg) 1188 Mean annual catch 5 5 3 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 <1 <1 <1 4 9 1 5 1 1 1 1 3034 21 18 33 19 108 219 (no) 6 4 2 6 1 5 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------19 18095 98/99 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 ------<1 10932 97/98 ------2 3 0 4 0 4 2 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 10 <1 8508 96/97 Observed catch (kg live wt.) 9 5 5 6 4 2 0 6 0 2 1 0 96 86 74 66 22 <1 <1 <1 18 14 11 <1 <1 <1 252 243 1465 2318 95/96 18354 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 16 11 57 12 11 11 <1 <1 <1 94/95 15371 ------9 6 1 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 2 98/99 4241 ------1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 97/98 2406 ------1 3 0 5 5 0 3 3 1 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 96/97 1933 Observed catch (no) 7 2 2 1 1 1 37 35 56 36 18 10 215 421 9 5 4 2 2 6 0 9 0 2 1 1 0 1 3 14 95/96 3809 0 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 17 6 9 9 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 94/95 2780 or Epinephelides armatus Aulopus purpurissatus Centroberyx lineatus Family Haemulidae Families Bothidae & Pleuronectidae Cheilodactylus rubrolabiatus Family Platycephalidae Lagocephalus scleratus Neosebastes spp. Pomatomus saltatrix Family Aplodactylidae Cnidoglanis macrocephalus Plectropomus leopardus Cephalopholis miniata Family Triglidae Family Uranoscopidae Family Ostraciidae Species Name Kyphosus cornelii Dactylophora nigricans Achoerodus gouldii Family Pentacerotidae Nemadactylus valenciennesi Argyrosomus hololepidotus Centroberyx spp. Seriola hipos Oplegnathus woodwardi Pagrus auratus Scorpis georgianus Tilodon sexfasciatum Neosebastes spp. 1 Region Breaksea Cod *Sergeant Baker Swallow Tail Sweetlip (unspecified) Flounder (unspecified) *Red-lipped Morwong Flathead *North West Blowfish *Gurnard Perch Tailor *Sea Carp, Cale Cobbler, Estuary Catfish Coral Trout *Gurnard *Stargazer (unspecified) *Boxfish Total Scalefish Common Name *Buffalo Bream *Dusky Morwong Blue Groper Boarfish (unspecified) Queen Snapper Mulloway Red snapper, Redfish, Nannygai Samson Fish Knife Jaw Pink Snapper Banded Sweep Moonlighter *Gurnard Perch Total (ii)

72 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 73 Appendix V cont. <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 9.4 8.4 6.2 4.4 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.0 0.6 841 (kg) 94.6 93.2 71.8 23.2 20.6 15.0 10.2 174.4 172.0 127.8 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1.6 3.0 4.8 2.2 1.8 3.4 0.8 0.4 2.2 2.6 0.8 263 Mean annual catch (no) 25.6 82.8 41.4 14.0 48.4 24.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 69.0 11.0 34.0 2243 98/99 184.0 506.0 576.0 156.0 324.0 250.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 799 47.0 73.0 53.0 97/98 279.0 139.0 193.0 93 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.0 26.0 10.0 96/97 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 281 64.0 68.0 14.0 27.0 95/96 102.0 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) <1 <1 6.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 788 13.0 30.0 45.0 54.0 64.0 14.0 51.0 30.0 31.0 22.0 94/95 307.0 104.0 4.0 7.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 800 27.0 24.0 79.0 22.0 15.0 11.0 98/99 248.0 184.0 160.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 198 41.0 57.0 17.0 25.0 38.0 16.0 97/98 34 0.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 68 0.0 8.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 28.0 11.0 95/96 5.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 216 45.0 58.0 31.0 26.0 11.0 94/95 Species Name Dactylophora nigricans Nemadactylus valenciennesi Pagrus auratus Achoerodus gouldii Family Pentacerotidae Centroberyx spp. Seriola hipos Kyphosus cornelii Family Monacanthidae Arripis truttaceus Thunnus maccoyii Family Carangidae Glaucosoma hebracium Argyrosomus hololepidotus Oplegnathus woodwardi Tilodon sexfasciatum Sarda australis Family Zeidae Family Triglidae Aulopus purpurissatus Family Scombridae Centroberyx lineatus Scorpis georgianus Neosebastes spp. 2 Region (iii) Common Name *Dusky Morwong Queen Snapper Pink Snapper Blue Groper Boarfish (unspecified) Red Snapper, Redfish, Nannygai Samson Fish *Buffalo Bream Leatherjacket (unspecified) Australian Salmon Southern Blue-fin Tuna Trevally (unspecified) West Australian Dhufish Mulloway Knife Jaw Moonlighter Bonito Dory (unspecified) *Gurnard *Sergeant Baker Mackerel (unspecified) Swallow Tail Banded Sweep *Gurnard Perch Total Scalefish

74 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 75 Appendix V cont. 9 7 5 5 2 2 63 62 57 45 40 25 37 16 10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 316 207 911 (kg) 8 6 3 2 5 8 2 2 3 0 30 31 19 15 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 136 273 Mean annual catch (no) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 14 14 28 73 28 18 25 <1 400 147 184 158 1122 98/99 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 60 17 41 11 48 26 152 368 97/98 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 28 62 14 14 55 37 451 345 1015 96/97 0 7 0 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 85 35 16 34 17 43 33 11 116 236 129 772 95/96 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 6 7 0 8 0 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 48 12 89 25 48 44 17 <1 <1 462 362 143 1279 94/95 5 2 2 4 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 73 48 51 23 25 10 159 416 98/99 7 4 6 6 3 7 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 56 94 97/98 2 4 8 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 13 22 202 309 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 6 5 1 2 0 2 9 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 53 31 42 13 19 193 95/96 5 9 7 4 7 2 1 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 54 21 13 10 212 355 94/95 Species Name Nemadactylus valenciennesi Achoerodus gouldii Family Pentacerotidae Pagrus auratus Kyphosus cornelii Centroberyx spp. Dactylophora nigricans Glaucosoma hebracium Seriola hipos Family Monacanthidae Seriola lalandi Oplegnathus woodwardi Argyrosomus hololepidotus Family Carangidae Family Scombridae Tilodon sexfasciatum Thunnus maccoyii Arripis truttaceus Aulopus purpurissatus Neosebastes spp. Sarda australis Epinephelides armatus Scorpis georgianus Centroberyx lineatus Family Triglidae Family Ostraciidae 3 (iv) Region Region (iv) Common Name Queen Snapper Blue Groper Boarfish (unspecified) Pink Snapper *Buffalo Bream Red Snapper, Redfish, Nannygai *Dusky Morwong West Australian Dhufish Samson Fish Leatherjacket (unspecified) Yellow tailed kingfish Knife Jaw Mulloway Trevally (unspecified) Mackerel (unspecified) Moonlighter Southern Blue-fin Tuna Australian Salmon *Sergeant Baker *Gurnard Perch Bonito Breaksea Cod Banded Sweep Swallow Tail *Gurnard *Boxfish Total

74 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 75 Appendix V cont. 9 9 9 8 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 47 34 42 29 17 15 13 900 757 348 326 299 273 270 240 171 141 106 (kg) 1,461 1,454 1,083 8 9 6 1 2 4 1 4 2 2 1 1 3 25 90 78 13 12 30 24 13 21 <1 <1 <1 214 189 159 143 393 126 111 133 101 Mean annual catch (no) 2 0 4 5 1 6 1 0 2 33 10 69 54 62 27 14 16 17 <1 710 707 852 409 260 508 190 110 214 134 98/99 1,560 2,600 1,813 1,187 1,315 4 7 7 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 15 11 25 10 58 13 13 38 765 893 787 711 317 189 654 329 186 385 310 127 97/98 1,370 0 4 7 0 6 0 3 0 2 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 24 46 14 70 32 19 35 26 382 566 630 359 309 192 160 168 96/97 1,007 1 6 9 0 5 0 6 0 0 1 2 1 7 0 1 20 13 77 19 16 17 15 43 831 225 142 134 406 164 131 95/96 2,910 1,208 1,131 1,119 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 8 9 0 3 0 1 0 6 0 42 39 77 12 12 885 184 421 104 212 177 103 261 139 94/95 1,083 1,690 1,015 1,064 3 2 2 2 7 0 8 2 2 4 3 2 1 0 3 66 81 13 33 47 58 39 26 40 229 348 266 193 371 236 128 537 250 191 98/99 8 3 2 4 3 1 0 8 6 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 99 14 93 96 29 17 36 49 25 201 131 134 372 116 196 124 97/98 2 0 3 1 7 7 3 5 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 4 56 83 99 53 47 86 70 30 10 126 175 116 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 1 6 3 1 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 93 15 40 11 11 81 22 10 14 10 427 156 166 117 608 109 124 95/96 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 69 30 34 59 18 40 10 17 30 10 16 159 214 149 172 441 107 94/95 Species Name Kyphosus cornelii Glaucosoma hebracium Dactylophora nigricans Achoerodus gouldii Nemadactylus valenciennesi Pagrus auratus Seriola hipos Centroberyx spp. Family Monacanthidae Family Scombridae Family Pentacerotidae Argyrosomus hololepidotus Seriola lalandi Oplegnathus woodwardi Choerodon rubescens Tilodon sexfasciatum Arripis truttaceus Scorpis aequipinnis Family Zeidae Sarda australis Scorpis georgianus Thunnus maccoyii Diagramma pictum Family Carangidae Scomberomorus commerson Epinephelides armatus Family Scaridae Family Platycephalidae Aulopus purpurissatus Family Aplodactylidae Families Bothidae & Pleuronectidae Cheilodactylus rubrolabiatus Lethrinus nebulosus Cnidoglanis macrocephalus 4 Region (v) Common Name *Buffalo Bream West Australian Dhufish *Dusky Morwong Blue Groper Queen Snapper Pink Snapper Samson Fish Red Snapper, Redfish, Nannygai Leatherjacket (unspecified) Mackerel (unspecified) Boarfish (unspecified) Mulloway Yellow tailed kingfish Knife Jaw Baldchin Groper Moonlighter Australian Salmon Sea sweep Dory (unspecified) Bonito Banded Sweep Southern Blue-fin Tuna Painted sweetlips, sand snapper Trevally (unspecified) Spanish mackerel Breaksea Cod Parrotfish (unspecified) Flathead *Sergeant Baker *Sea Carp, Cale Flounder (unspecified) *Red-lipped Morwong Spangled Emperor Cobbler, Estuary Catfish

76 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 77 Appendix V cont. <1 <1 <1 8083 5 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 95 93 41 38 28 22 21 16 14 10 10 744 735 403 215 181 174 154 152 125 (kg) 0 <1 <1 1921 5 8 6 9 7 3 4 5 2 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 59 26 38 13 35 17 12 14 <1 <1 106 108 102 Mean annual catch (no) 3 0 0 12894 0 0 8 0 2 1 3 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 63 41 13 14 <1 387 818 116 127 113 98/99 0 0 <1 7230 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 2 0 62 38 13 69 45 24 17 13 499 341 375 170 312 212 171 123 97/98 0 0 0 4068 9 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 3 0 45 85 80 37 20 24 12 11 12 34 11 10 763 811 436 123 120 163 102 96/97 1 1 0 8662 3 6 0 4 4 0 6 5 21 92 87 19 25 24 11 14 16 11 10 511 429 333 314 260 340 314 165 187 95/96 1,007 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 <1 0 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 2 0 4 3 1 7 7562 98 30 61 66 661 388 109 200 657 149 136 201 102 94/95 1,061 1,193 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 3 0 6 2 1 1 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 3195 52 17 25 17 10 120 98/99 0 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 9 4 0 5 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 3 2 0 72 50 55 83 31 40 19 21 12 15 1771 97/98 0 0 0 2 5 3 4 3 0 5 1 5 4 2 7 5 1 0 0 3 0 994 64 54 10 33 14 37 15 16 10 109 119 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 0 2 1 9 2 7 3 8 3 3 6 0 2 2 2 4 0 6 4 75 63 36 83 19 14 35 43 33 26 17 156 155 2043 95/96 0 0 1 3 9 7 0 7 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 6 97 36 24 59 81 10 38 24 141 175 194 1603 94/95 Centroberyx lineatus Neosebastes spp. Family Ostraciidae Species Name Glaucosoma hebracium Kyphosus cornelii Dactylophora nigricans Nemadactylus valenciennesi Thunnus albacares Achoerodus gouldii Choerodon rubescens Argyrosomus hololepidotus Seriola lalandi Seriola hippos Pagrus auratus Diagramma pictum Family Monacanthidae Tilodon sexfasciatum Family Pentacerotidae Centroberyx spp. Arripis truttaceus Family Scombridae Family Carangidae Scomberomorus commerson Scorpis georgianus Pomatomus saltatrix Sarda australis Family Haemulidae Family Scaridae Epinephelides armatus Thunnus maccoyii Oplegnathus woodwardi Centroberyx lineatus 5 Swallow Tail *Gurnard Perch *Boxfish Total Common Name West Australian Dhufish *Buffalo Bream *Dusky Morwong Queen Snapper Yellowfin Tuna Blue Groper Baldchin Groper Mulloway Yellow tailed kingfish Samson Fish Pink Snapper Painted sweetlips, sand snapper Leatherjacket (unspecified) Moonlighter Boarfish (unspecified) Red snapper, Redfish, Nannygai Australian Salmon Mackerel (unspecified) Trevally (unspecified) Spanish mackerel Banded Sweep Tailor Bonito Sweetlip (unspecified) Parrotfish (unspecified) Breaksea Cod Southern Blue-fin Tuna Knife Jaw Swallow Tail (vi) Region Region (vi)

76 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 77 Appendix V cont. 9 3 2 1 89 80 57 35 32 23 19 17 <1 <1 384 169 129 (kg) 1049 2 2 1 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3311 7 4 8 9 1 1 1 1 56 24 29 32 13 <1 <1 <1 <1 181 Mean annual catch (no) 1 2 1 2 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 606 ------98/99 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1730 ------97/98 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 <1 2506 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 55 16 37 18 17 131 204 490 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 96/97 <1 <1 2928 0 9 7 0 0 1 65 56 33 14 859 255 110 234 204 164 104 7 4 7 5 2 1 0 2114 95/96 <1 <1 <1 <1 4247 Observed Catch (kg whole wt) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 17 11 70 14 <1 239 120 543 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 94/95 <1 5143 ------1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 98/99 275 ------1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 97/98 448 8 6 3 2 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 19 46 91 0 1 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 539 96/97 Observed Catch (no) 0 9 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 4 4 3 1 7 1 3 0 1 1 1 36 26 82 19 36 11 16 126 371 842 95/96 7 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 35 16 16 81 927 94/95 or or Family Zeidae Aulopus purpurissatus Cheilodactylus rubrolabiatus Families Bothidae & Pleuronectidae Lagocephalus scleratus Scorpis aequipinnis Neosebastes spp. Family Platycephalidae Plectropomus leopardus Cephalopholis miniata Family Uranoscopidae Family Ostraciidae Species Name Kyphosus cornelii Glaucosoma hebracium Diagramma pictum Pagrus auratus Seriola hipos Family Scaridae Argyrosomus hololepidotus Choerodon rubescens Thunnus albacares Lethrinus nebulosus Seriola lalandi Dactylophora nigricans Achoerodus gouldii Nemadactylus valenciennesi Plectropomus leopardus Cephalopholis miniata Scorpis georgianus Scorpis aequipinnis 6 Region Dory (unspecified) *Sergeant Baker *Red-lipped Morwong Flounder (unspecified) *North West Blowfish Sea sweep *Gurnard Perch Flathead Coral Trout *Stargazer (unspecified) *Boxfish Total Common Name *Buffalo Bream West Australian Dhufish Painted sweetlips, sand snapper Pink Snapper Samson Fish Parrotfish (unspecified) Mulloway Baldchin Groper Yellowfin Tuna Spangled Emperor Yellow tailed kingfish *Dusky Morwong Blue Groper Queen Snapper Coral Trout Banded Sweep Sea sweep Total (vii)

78 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 79 78 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003 79 List of Fisheries Research Reports Not all have been listed here, a complete list is available online at http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/res

83 The Western Rock Lobster fishery 1985/86. 109 The western rock lobster fishery 1991/92 to (Salmo trutta) with special reference to Western Brown, R.S. and Barker, E.H. (1990.) 1992/93. Chubb, C.F. and Barker, E.H. (1998.) Australia : a review. Molony, B. (2001.) 84 The Marine open shelf environment: review of 110 A Research vessel survey of bottom types in the 131 Pilchard ( sagax) nursery areas and human influences. Hancock, D.A. (1990.) area of the Abrolhos Islands and mid-west trawl recruitment process assessment between different fishery. Dibden, C.J. and Joll, L.M. (1998.) regions in southern Western Australia. Gaughan, 85 A Description of the British United Trawlers / D.J., Baudains, G.A., Mitchell, R.W.D. and Leary, T.I. Southern Ocean Trawlers operation in the Great 111 Sea temperature variability off Western Australia (2002.) Australian Bight during the period 19.11.77 to 1990 to 1994. Pearce, A., Rossbach, M., Tait, M. 28.5.79. Walker, M.H., Blight, S.J. and Clarke, D.P. and Brown, R. (1999.) 132 A review of food availability, sea water (1989.) characteristics and bivalve growth performance 112 Final report, FRDC project 94/075: enhancement occuring at coastal culture sites in temperate and 86 The Demersal trawl resources of the Great of yabbie production from Western Australian farm warm temperate regions of the world. Saxby, S.A. Australian Bight as indicated by the fishing dams. Lawrence, C., Morrissy, N., Bellanger, J. and (2002.) operations of the stern trawlers Othello, Orsino and Cheng, Y. W. (1998.) Cassio in the period 19.11.77 to 28.5.79. Walker, 133 Preliminary assessment and seasonal fluctuations M.H. and Clarke, D.P. (1990.) 113 Catch, effort and the conversion from gill nets in the fish biota inhabiting the concentrator ponds to traps in the Peel-Harvey and Cockburn Sound of Dampier Salt, Port Hedland, with options for 87 The recreational marron fishery in Western blue swimmer (Portunus pelagicus) fisheries. the potential application of results. Molony, B. and Australia summarised research statistics, 1971– Melville-Smith, R., Cliff, M. and Anderton, S.M. Parry, G. (2002.) 1987. Morrissy, N.M. and Fellows, C.J. (1990.) (1999.) 134 Towards an assessment of the natural and human 88 A synopsis of the biology and the exploitation of 114 The Western Australian scallop industry. use impacts on the marine environment of the the Australasian pilchard, Sardinops neopilchardus Harris, D.C., Joll, L.M. and Watson, R.A. (1999.) Abrolhos Islands. Volume 1, Summary of existing (Steindachner). Part 1: Biology. Fletcher, W.J. information and current levels of human use. (1990.) 115 Statistical analysis of Gascoyne region recreational fishing study July 1996. Sumner, N.R. and Steckis, CDRom in back pocket has the title “Abrolhos 89 Relationships among partial and whole lengths R.A. (1999.) Survey”. Webster, F.J., Dibden, C.J., Weir, and weights for Western Australian pink snapper K.E. and Chubb, C.F. (2002.) Volume 2, Strategic Chrysophrys auratus (Sparidae). Moran, M.J. and 116 The western rock lobster fishery 1993/94 to research and develoment plan. Chubb, C.F., Burton, C. (1990.) 1994/95 Chubb, C.F. and Barker, E.H. (2000.) Webster, F.J., Dibden, C.J. and Weir, K.E. (2002.) 90 A Summary of projects financed by the Fisheries 117 A 12-month survey of coastal recreational boat 135 The western rock lobster fishery 1995/96 to Research and Development Fund 1965–1983. fishing between Augusta and Kalbarri on the 1996/97. Chubb, C.F. and Barker, E.H. (2002.) (1991.) west coast of Western Australia during 1996-97. Sumner, N.R. and Williamson, P.C. (1999.) 136 Assessment of gonad staging systems and other 91 A synopsis of the biology and the exploitation of methods used in the study of the reproductive the Australasian pilchard, Sardinops neopilchardus 118 A study into Western Australia’s open access biology of narrow-barred Spanish mackerel , (Steindachner) Part II : History of stock and wetline fisheries. Crowe, F., Lehre, W. and Scomberomorus commerson, in Western Australia. assessment and exploitation. Fletcher, W.J. (1991.) Lenanton, R.J.C. (1999.) Mackie, M. and Lewis, P. (2001.) 92 Spread of the introduced yabbie Cherax albidus 119 Final report : FRDC project 95/037 : The biology 137 Annual report on the monitoring of the recreational Clark, 1936 in Western Australia. Morrissy, N.M. and stock assessment of the tropical , marron fishery in 2000, with an analysis of long- and Cassells, G. (1992.) Sardinella lemuru, off the mid-west coast of term data and changes within this fishery. Molony, Western Australia. Gaughan, D.J. and Mitchell, B. and Bird, C. (2002.) 93 Biological synopsis of the black bream, R.W.D. (2000.) Acanthopagrus butcheri (Munro) (Teleostei: 138 Historical diving profiles for pearl oyster divers in Sparidae). Norriss, J.V., Tregonning, J.E., Lenanton, 120 A 12 month survey of recreational fishing in Western Australia. Lulofs, H.M.A. and Sumner, N.R. R.C.J. and Sarre, G.A. (2002.) the Leschenault Estuary of Western Australia (2002.) during 1998. Malseed, B. E., Sumner, N.R. and 94 to 98 No reports were published under these Williamson, P.C. (2000.) 139 A 12-month survey of recreational fishing in the numbers. Gascoyne bioregion of Western Australia during 121 Synopsis of the biology and exploitation of the blue 1998-99. Sumner, N.R., Willimson, P.C. and 99 An Investigation of weight loss of marron (Cherax swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, in Malseed, B.E. (2002.) tenuimanus) during live transport to market. Western Australia. Kangas, M.I. (2000.) Morrissy, N.; Walker, P.; Fellows, C.; Moore, W. 140 The western rock lobster fishery 1997/98 to (1993.) 122 Western rock lobster mail surveys of licensed 1998/99. Chubb, C.F. and Barker, E.H. (2003.) recreational fishers 1986/87 to 1998/99. Melville- 100 The Impact of for saucer scallops and Smith, R. and Anderton, S.M. (2000.) 141 A guide to good otolith cutting. Jenke, J. (2002.) western king on the benthic communities in 142 Identifying the developmental stages of preserved coastal waters off south-western Australia. (FRDC 123 Review of productivity levels of Western Australian coastal and estuarine waters for mariculture of snapper, Pagrus auratus, from , final report 90/019 ) Laurenson, L.B.J., Unsworth, Western Australia. Norriss, J. V. and Jackson G. P., Penn, J.W. and Lenanton, R.C.J. (1993.) planning purposes. CDRom in back pocket has title “Chlorophyll-a concentration in Western Australian (2002.) 101 The Big Bank region of the limited entry fishery for coastal waters - a source document. by S. Helleren 143 Methods used in the collection, preparation and the western rock lobster Panulirus cygnus. Chubb, and A. Pearce” (document in PDF format) Pearce, interpretation of narrow-barred Spanish mackerel C.F., Barker, E.H. and Dibden, C.J. (1994.) A., Helleren, S. and Marinelli, M. (2000.) (Scomberomorus commerson) otoliths for a study 102 A Review of international aquaculture development 124 The Evaluation of a recreational fishing stock of age and growth in Western Australia. Lewis P. D. and selected species in environments relevant to enhancement trial of black bream (Acanthopagrus and Mackie, M. (2003.) Western Australia. Lawrence, C.S. (1995.) butcheri) in the Swan , Western Australia. 144 FRDC Project 1998/302 – Rock Lobster Dibden, C.J., Jenkins, G., Sarre, G.A., Lenanton, Enhancement and Aquaculture Subprogram: 103 Identifying the developmental stages for eggs of R.C.J. and Ayvazian, S.G. (2000.) the Australian pilchard, Sardinops sagax. White, Towards establishing techniques for large scale K.V. and Fletcher, W.J. (Warrick Jeffrey) (1998.) 125 A history of foreign fishing activities and fishery- harvesting of pueruli and obtaining a better independent surveys of the demersal finfish understanding of mortality rates. Phillips B. F. 104 Assessment of the effects of a trial period of resources in the Kimberley region of Western (2003.) unattended recreational netting in selected Australia. [Part funded by Fisheries Research and of temperate Western Australia. Development Corporation Project 94/026 ] Nowara, Lenanton, R.C., Allison, R. and Ayvazian, S.G. G.B. and Newman, S.J. (2001.) (1996.) 126 A 12 month survey of recreational fishing in the 105 The western rock lobster fishery 1986/7 to Swan-Canning Estuary Basin of Western Australia 1990/91. Chubb, C.F., Barker, E.H.and Brown, R.S. during 1998-99. Malseed, B.E. and Sumner, N.R. (1996.) (2001.) 106 Environmental and biological aspects of the mass 127 A 12 month survey of recreational fishing in the mortality of pilchards (Autumn 1995) in Western Peel-Harvey Estuary of Western Australia during Australia. Fletcher, W.J., Jones, B., Pearce, A.F. and 1998-99. Malseed, B.E. and Sumner, N.R. (2001.) Hosja, W. (1997.) 128 Aquaculture and related biological attributes of 107 Chemical composition of yabbies, Cherax albidus species in Australia - a review. Freeman, Clark 1936 from Western Australian farm dams. K.A. (2001.) Francesconi, K.A. and Morrissy, N.M. (1996.) 129 Morpholgy and incidence of yabby (Cherax albidus) 108 Aspects of the biology and stock assessment burrows in Western Australia. Lawrence, C.S., of the whitebait, Hyperlophus vittatus, in south Brown, J.I. and Bellanger, J.E. (2001.) western Australia. Gaughan, D.J., Fletcher, W.J., Tregonning, R.J. and Goh, J. (1996.) 130 Environmental requirements and tolerences of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and

80 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 146, 2003