DOCSLIB.ORG

Reply to the Critical Comments of Mr. Frank Gaetno Morales on the So-Called 'Neo-Hinduism' and 'Radical Universalism'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reply to the Critical Comments of Mr. Frank Gaetno Morales on the So-Called 'Neo-Hinduism' and 'Radical Universalism' id33803827 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Reply to the critical comments of Mr. Frank Gaetno Morales ‘ ’ ‘ ’ on the so-called Neo-Hinduism and Radical Universalism . Mr. Frank Gaetano Morales observed that Hinduism never supported the “ ” idea of the so-called Radical Universalism claiming that all religions are the same. But he must know that Hinduism is the most ancient and universal religion which took the origin millions of years ago, even before Christ was born and Buddha made his appearance. At the time Hinduism took its origins there was absolutely no religion which existed in the world. So it became universal. It is only with the advent of Buddhism in 500 B.C. and Christianity 2006 years ago, other religions like Jainism, Sikhism, Zorastrianism, Zen Buddhism, Chintoism etc. raised their heads in accordance with the preachings of the respective gurus who are treated as gods by their followers. Even within India, many great gurus came on the scene after Christ and Mohammed established their respective religions through their ardent devotees. They all started preaching as though theirs is the only God of their religion and nobody else. For example, Christians treat Jesus Christ only as their god and nobody else; Muslims treat Allah as the only unseen God who can give deliverance. The followers of Zoraster consider him as their only God and nobody else. Also they started converting others to their respective religions by hook or crook. Simultaneously a sort of dogmatism and fundamentalism is also developed by the followers of all these religions. At this juncture Sri Ramakrishna came in the 19th century. He was born in an orthodox Hindu family worshiping Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva. At that time the British was ruling our country and consequently Christian Fathers came to India in large numbers and not knowing anything about Hinduism practised by the people o India, they started preaching about Jesus Christ and converting people into their own religion (Christianity) at the cost of Hinduism. They were even giving some monetary benefits to the poor people of India to attract them towards Christianity, as is done even now. Seeing the onslaughts of Christianity and also Buddhism and other religions on Hinduism, after realizing the Truths of Hinduism, Sri Ramakrishna for the first time practised Christianity and Mohammadanism to find out the truth of these religions and established that these religions also are as true as Hinduism ‘ and for the first time vindicated the Vedic dictum, Truth is one, but sages call it in many ways (Ekam sat viprah bahuda vadanti). His chief disciple, Swami Vivekananda, while preaching Hinduism in America and Europe also - 1 - explained this concept in a broad way, and this was followed by many other ‘ saints of modern India. So this is not a non-Hindu idea and Radical ’ Universalism as is coined by Mr. Morales. It is already there in the Vedas and it has become universal. But there was no necessity at that time (when other religions were not in existence) to dilate it further. It is only when the necessity came, Sri Ramakrishna explained it in so many words, that too after experimenting with the truth in the other two major religions of the world, viz, Christianity and Islam. If other religions do not accept this idea of the same Truth in all religions, it is because of their gross ignorance Thus you can say that Hinduism is the most broad-minded religion in the world. It is no doubt true that modern Indians do not find time to understand Hinduism in its depths and so they are not able to influence their children about the greatness and broad-mindedness of Hinduism. The modern Indian children succumbing to the influence of the material West started indulging in gross material pursuits and do not like to know the deeper truths of Hinduism and some of them being in the West are mostly influenced by Christian Fathers in the absence of any Indian satgurus there and begin to abuse Hinduism. So, it is not proper on the part of Mr. Morales to attribute ‘ ’ – all this to Neo-Hinduism or Radical universalism the terms coined by him to conveniently make all sorts of derogatory remarks against Hinduism practised and followed in modern times. In fact, he used big and strong derogatory words that are available in English dictionary to abuse Hinduism as it is followed now putting in the mouth of modern saints and Hindu ‘ ’ scholars that all religions are the same without even authenticating it. In fact it is his own intellectual concoction, without understanding the purport ‘ ’ of the Vedic dictum Ekam sat Viprah bahuda vadanti which does not at all mean that all religions are same. He did all this through his intellectual perversions and pre-conceived notions. We strongly object to the derogatory words used by Mr. Morales that ‘ parents themselves are not to be blamed for espousing this non-Hindu idea to their children. Rather, much of the blame is to be placed at the feet of ’ today s ill-equipped teachers and leaders, the supposed guardians of ’ authentic dharma teachings . This is utterly a freakish nonsense and is a highly irresponsible remark of the writer using the freedom of speech that is given to him by the Constitution in good faith. Big big words in English cannot at all destroy the greatest truths of Hinduism. Hindu religion preaches mostly spiritualism through - 2 - meditation and God-consciousness. That is the reason why the West is looking to India and Hinduism to realise the beneficial effects of meditation which will not only keep a healhy mind, but also a healthy body. To the question by some of the Hindu youth that since all religions are he same, why not they follow the religion of their own liking, Swami Vivekananda replied that a Hindu can become a better Hindu, a Christian a better Christian, a Muslim a better Muslim by remaining and following his own religion truthfully and sincerely and there is absolutely no need for converting to any other religion. It is only on account of conversion tactics which some of the followers of other religions are indulging in, the Hindu youth are becoming vulnerable and susceptible to jump to any other religion the leaders of which are influencing them, forgetting the greatness of their own religion. We also agree that temple priests are ill-equipped with the knowledge of Hinduism because being poor, they are firstly taking up jobs as temple priests which does not involve much of an effort except to get by heart a few Sanskrit slokas and Vedic hymns and puja procedures, only to eke out their livelihood. Thus the temple priests are completely ill-equipped with the knowledge of Hinduism. Hindu Sastras are only in Sanskrit which a few intellectuals who have mastered Sanskrit are able to grasp the truths of Hinduism and give this knowledge to the public. While some of them fail to convey this knowledge properly to the people, a few others are able to understand and express better the ideas and truths explained in Hinduism. The perverted intellectuals like the present author who attributed radical universalism to modern saints etc. are unable to go and find out the tenets and truths of Hinduism from those few genuine saints of modern India to establish that they pertain to traditional Hinduism. The question of religious intolerance had never arisen in ancient times when no other religion existed except Hinduism. So the entire chapter of criticism that Hinduism has not believed in tolerance is dismissed on this “ ” ground. In fact, tolerance is one of the virtues (and not a tradition) extolled in the Vedic era, which is practised by genuine followers of Hinduism even today. There was only one religion in India, viz, Hinduism from the very ancient times (Buddhism, Jainism etc. are only off-shoots and recent ones). The philosophy of Hinduism has been vividly explained in modern terms (which - 3 - can be easily understood) by great saints like Sri Ramakrishna because of the onslaughts of Christian fathers and Muslim leaders and their destructive ‘ ’ practices against Hinduism. So it cannot be dubbed as neo-Hinduism or ‘ ’ radical universalism which is purported to have been introduced in modern times. All the ideas and tenets of Hinduism explained in modern terms were already there in Vedic times and there was no necessity of explaining them so vividly till the onslaughts of Christianity and Islam in the 19th and 20th centuries and also being carried out in the 21st century. Dubbing Sri Ramakrishna and Swami Vivekananda as neo-Hindu radical universalists is simply atrocious. As was said above, when Christianity was in its ascendancy and its preachers were damaging the image of Hinduism from its roots in their zeal to Christianise the entire world, it was Sri Ramakrishna who experimented with Christian religion as also with Islam and proved to the world the Vedic dictum that Truth (Brahman) is one and all religions are different paths to reach that Brahman; and to realise Brahman one needs a lot of faith (Shraddha) and sincerity in his spiritual pursuits and for this purpose conversion is not at all necessary. Swami Vivekananda while explaining broadly what Sri Ramakrishna meant, went a step further and said that without any conversion idea whatsoever, a Christian can become a better Christian, a Muslim a better Muslim and a Hindu a better Hindu by practising his or her own religion faithfully and sincerely. It is highly idiotic to spell this as neo-Hindu radical universalism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addressing Fundamentalism by Legal and Spiritual Means
    H UMAN R IGHTS & H UMAN W ELFARE Addressing Fundamentalism by Legal and Spiritual Means By Dan Wessner Religion and Humane Global Governance by Richard A. Falk. New York: Palgrave, 2001. 191 pp. Gender and Human Rights in Islam and International Law: Equal before Allah, Unequal before Man? by Shaheen Sardar Ali. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000. 358 pp. Religious Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women edited by Courtney W. Howland. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999. 326 pp. The Islamic Quest for Democracy, Pluralism, and Human Rights by Ahmad S. Moussalli. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2001. 226 pp. The post-Cold War era stands at a crossroads. Some sort of new world order or disorder is under construction. Our choice to move more toward multilateralism or unilateralism is informed well by inter-religious debate and international law. Both disciplines rightly challenge the “post- Enlightenment divide between religion and politics,” and reinvigorate a spiritual-legal dialogue once thought to be “irrelevant or substandard” (Falk: 1-8, 101). These disciplines can dissemble illusory walls between spiritual/sacred and material/modernist concerns, between realpolitik interests and ethical judgment (Kung 1998: 66). They place praxis and war-peace issues firmly in the context of a suffering humanity and world. Both warn as to how fundamentalism may subjugate peace and security to a demagogic, uncompromising quest. These disciplines also nurture a community of speech that continues to find its voice even as others resort to war. The four books considered in this essay respond to the rush and risk of unnecessary conflict wrought by fundamentalists.
    [Show full text]
  • 339 Michael J. Mcclymond This Work Broaches the Centuries-Old Debate
    Book Reviews 339 Michael J. McClymond, The Devil’s Redemption: A New History and Interpretation of Christian Universalism 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018). xxiv + 1325 pp. $90.00 hardcover. This work broaches the centuries-old debate over universal salvation, bring- ing together careful historical reconstruction of arguments, on both sides, with rigorous theological analysis. Historical theologian Michael McClymond fur- nishes timely perspective into universalism in its many forms, past and present. While a distinct majority throughout Christian history have sought to draw up lines against universalism, there is an increasing number, even among evangel- icals, who gravitate to the possibility that a loving God will finally save every person he has created. In chapter 1 McClymond addresses historic Protestant, Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, evangelical, and Pentecostal-charismatic perspectives. Chapter 2 traces the Western esoteric roots of universalism, originating within ancient Gnosticism and reemerging in the Jewish Kabbalah and Christian Cabala of the Late Medieval and Early Modern periods. The next two chap- ters survey the undeniable influence of the ancient Alexandrian theologian Origen. Chapters 5 and 6 consider the modern resurgence of universalism in the thought of German Lutheran Jakob Böhme and American Protestantism, respectively. Chapter 7 surveys the rise of universalism in the German idealism of Immanuel Kant, Julius Müller, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Georg W.F. Hegel, FriedrichW.J. Schelling, and PaulTillich. Chapter 8 considers the impact of Rus- sian Sophianism in the thought of Vladimir Solovyov, Nicolas Berdyaev, Georges Florovsky, and Sergei Bulgakov. Chapter 9 examines the significance of Karl Barth’s doctrine of universal election and Jürgen Moltmann’s notion of divine passibility.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ten Years Later: Fear, Fundamentalism and Unitarian Universalism"
    Prairie Unitarian U niversalist Society 2010 Whenona Drive, Madison, WI 53711 * 608-271-8218 * www.uuprairie.org "Ten Years Later: Fear, Fundamentalism and Unitarian Universalism" Today's Order of Service Announcements Green Note Pack a litter free lunch. You can find many Prelude - "Sounds from the Gumdrop Factory," performed by Katherine Liu. reusable lunch kit items at places like Goodwill: cloth napkins, mismatched silverware, and even unusual Welcome and Announcements - Barb Park bags to use as your "lunch box." Then think about saving plastic and glass containers that have good lids Opening Words: America and Islam are not exclusive and to pack your lunch in. You will likely eat better need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share bringing lunch from home, and with a litter-free lunch common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the kit you are also helping the earth. dignity of all human beings. -Barack Obama The Humanist Union meets today after the service. A potluck lunch will start at 11 :45 am, and will be *Hymn #134 (SLT): "Our World Is One World," Doleta followed by a program entitled, "Looking Back, Chapru, accompanist. Looking Forward." September marks 7 years since a Lighting of the Chalice: The wise man in the storm prays t» group of Prairie members decided to form the God, not for safety from danger, but for deliverance from humanist discussion group which subsequently became fear. the Humanist Union of Madison. We will talk about -Ralph. Waldo Emerson our favorite programs over the last seven years, ideas for future programs, and how to best take advantage of Silent Meditation the publicity generated for our group by the Madison Area Coalition of Reason publicity campaign which Story for All Ages we expect to be underway.
    [Show full text]
  • God Is Not a Person (An Argument Via Pantheism)
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2019) 85:281–296 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9678-x ARTICLE God is not a person (an argument via pantheism) Simon Hewitt1 Received: 22 November 2017 / Accepted: 3 July 2018 / Published online: 6 July 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract This paper transforms a development of an argument against pantheism into an objection to the usual account of God within contemporary analytic philosophy (’Swinburnian theism’). A standard criticism of pantheism has it that pantheists cannot ofer a satisfactory account of God as personal. My paper will develop this criticism along two lines: frst, that personhood requires contentful mental states, which in turn necessitate the membership of a linguistic community, and second that personhood requires limitation within a wider context constitutive of the ’setting’ of the agent’s life. Pantheism can, I argue, satisfy neither criterion of personhood. At this point the tables are turned on the Swinburnian theist. If the pantheist cannot defend herself against the personhood-based attacks, neither can the Swinburnian, and for instructively parallel reasons: for neither doctrine is God in the material world; in the pantheist case God is identical with the world, in the Swinburnian case God transcends it. Either way both the pantheist and the Swinburnian are left with a dilemma: abandon divine personhood or modify the doctrine of God so as to block the move to personhood. Keywords Pantheism · Divine personhood · Apophaticism · Divine language Is God a person? Since the advent of philosophy of religion in the analytic tradi- tion the consensus of opinion has favoured answering this question in the afrma- tive (as we will see in due course).
    [Show full text]
  • The Episcopal Church: Tearing the Fabric of Communion to Shreds
    AMERICAN ANGLICAN CO UNCIL THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: TEARING THE FABRIC OF COMMUNION TO SHREDS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?” Psalm 11:3 In the following sections we describe how the leadership of The Episcopal Church has been systematically destroying the foundations of Anglican Christianity within the United States, and tearing the fabric of the Anglican Communion to shreds. Through the following sections, we will demonstrate, through the words of TEC leaders, their actions and their defiance of both the Bible and the instruments of Anglican unity, why orthodox Anglicans in North America were led to form the Anglican Church in North America in order to preserve and promote an Anglicanism that is truly Biblical, missionary and united. Catalogue of Heresies Quoting Episcopal Church leaders denying Jesus as the only way to the Father, denying the divinity and uniqueness of Jesus Christ, denying the Resurrection, denying heaven and hell, denying salvation through the cross of Jesus Christ, denying the authority of Holy Scripture, denying the Creeds, and denying Biblical standards for human sexuality. We also document the fruits of TEC‘s new theology—which include a refusal to reaffirm the historic articles of the Christian faith, syncretism, the promotion of abortion, weakening traditional marriage, promoting same sex blessings and other sexual aberrations, communion for the unbaptized, and accelerating litigation by TEC against the orthodox. We conclude with the heresies of the current Presiding Bishop, in her own words, an analysis that demonstrates her affirmation of the classic heresies of Pelagianism, Marcionism, Pluralism, Universalism and Gnosticism.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Starter Facts About Unitarian Universalism
    5 Starter Facts About Unitarian Universalism 1. Unitarian Universalism welcomes pluralism and diversity in its beliefs and practices, embracing teachings from Eastern and Western religions and philosophies. There are ~250,000 adherents in the United States. 2. Unitarian Universalism was established in 1961 from the merge of the Universalist Church of America (est. 1793), and the American Unitarian Association (est. 1825). The name refers to the oneness of God and the belief that all people gain salvation. 3. Unitarian-Universalists do not have a common creed or doctrine, but they share seven principles viewed as guidance for life and morality. It includes affirmation of the inherent dignity of every person, promotion of justice, equality and compassion, and a free and responsible search for truth and meaning. 4. Because Unitarian Universalism has its roots in Protestant Christianity, the Bible remains an important sacred text for many. However, they also turn to texts from other traditions and cultures around the world for wisdom and spiritual insights. Central to their understanding of scripture and sacred texts is that each text must be understood to be a product of a particular time and place. 5. Believing in God is not an expectation, like most Western religions. Rather, the varying concepts of the divine, or lack thereof, is what uplifts the community in not feeling alone in their personal beliefs. Learn more at: https://www.uua.org/beliefs https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-corter-/unitarian-universalism-wh_b_14174824.htm l These five points are not meant to be comprehensive or authoritative. We hope they encourage you to explore this spirituality more deeply and seek out members of this community to learn about their beliefs in action.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2009 A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model Haejong Je Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Je, Haejong, "A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model" (2009). Dissertations. 70. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/70 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN LIGHT OF HIS ESCHATOLOGICAL MODEL by Haejong Je Adviser: John T. Baldwin ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN LIGHT OF HIS ESCHATOLOGICAL MODEL Name of researcher: Haejong Je Name and degree of faculty adviser: John T. Baldwin, Ph.D. Date approved: April 2009 Introduction to the Problem The philosophy of John Hick, who is famous for his religious pluralism, has received vigorous study in terms of its epistemology, authority, the concept of God, and Christology. However, less attention has been given to his pareschatology. As explained below, initial investigation shows that there is a need for in-depth study of Hick’s religious philosophy in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativism and Universalism.Pdf
    Relativism and Universalism Richard A. Shweder As the moral philosopher David Wong has noted (2006: xi): “The standard characterizations of [moral] relativism make it an easy target and seldom reveal what really motivates people who are attracted to it. Introductory textbooks in ethics frequently portray the view as an extreme variety of subjectivism (or conventionalism) in which anything goes – a person‟s (or group‟s) accepting that something is right makes it right for that person (or group).” This variety of moral relativism pictures human subjectivity in terms of human reactions of both acceptance (feelings of approbation) and rejection (feelings of opprobrium). Its central principle states that approving of some act or customary practice makes it right (good, virtuous, moral) and disapproving of the very same act or customary practice makes it wrong (bad, vicious, immoral); and this is so for any conceivable act or customary practice whether it is eating pork, terminating a pregnancy, drinking alcohol, spanking a child, banning a book, marrying a member of your own sex, marrying more than one member of the opposite sex, walking bare breasted on a public beach, covering yourself with a burqa 1 in the public square, conducting a Bris,2 surgically reshaping the genitals of all the children in ones family regardless of their gender, assisting someone in committing a suicide or immolating yourself on the funeral pyre of your husband. Writing more or less in this vein the anthropologist Ruth Benedict once defined morality as “a convenient term for socially approved habits” (1934). It is not too surprising that this variety of moral relativism is viewed as extreme by many moral philosophers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextualized Study of Vivekananda's Neo- Vedanta (Through Karl Mannheim Approach of Sociology of Knowledge)
    Available online at http://www.journalijdr.com ISSN: 2230-9926 International Journal of Development Research Vol. 07, Issue, 11, pp.16647-16651, November, 2017 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLEORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS A CONTEXTUALIZED STUDY OF VIVEKANANDA’S NEO- VEDANTA (THROUGH KARL MANNHEIM APPROACH OF SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE) 1*Dr. Nosheen Zaheer and 2Zainab Mazhar 1Associate Professor, HoD Islamic Studies and Dean of Humanities SBKWU Quetta, 2Assistant Professor SBKWU Quetta ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: This paper aims to evaluate a contextualized interpretation of Vivekananda’s neo-Vedanta in nineteen century Received 04th August 2017 Bengali society by implementing the Karl Mannheim approach of sociology of knowledge. This approach Received in revised form will focus the socio-historical perspectives that facilitate the transformation of Classical Indian Vedanta 26th September, 2017 philosophy to neo-Vedanta. Religious encountering in pluralistic society posed serious threats of assimilations Accepted 11th October, 2017 and syncreticism to religious beliefs. This issue is going to be examined in especial context of Hinduism th through Karl Mannheim approach’s horizontal and vertical mobility. Here horizontal mobility reflects the role Published online 29 November, 2017 and contribution of the Warren Hasting, orientalists and Christian missionaries as a key factor in destabilizing Key Words: the core beliefs of Hinduism (Idol worship, caste system and Brahmins the soul custodians of religious knowledge). That further makes road for vertical mobility of in four cast strata of Hindu society by questioning the authority and monopoly of Brahmins (priestly class of Hindus). Thus, results in collapsing of neo-Vedanta, intellectual monopoly of Brahmins by creating free intelligentsia who were fully equipped to reinterpret Advaita Vedanta, classical Hinduism.
    [Show full text]
  • Abrahamic Religions and Terrorism: the Common Themes and Power of Politics
    Abrahamic Religions and Terrorism: The Common Themes and Power of Politics By Alexander D. Parker Honors Thesis Appalachian State University Submitted to the Department of Philosophy and Religion and the Department of Government and Justice Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Bachelor of Science in Political Science Bachelor of Arts in Religious Studies May 2020 Parker 1 Approved by: Nancy S. Love, Ph.D., Honors Thesis Co-Director Laura Ammon, Ph.D., Honors Thesis Co-Director Nancy S. Love, Ph.D., Honors Thesis Co-Second Reader Laura Ammon, Ph.D., Honors Thesis Co-Second Reader Ellen M. Key, Ph.D., Government and Justice Studies Departmental Honors Director Laura Ammon, Ph.D., Philosophy and Religion Departmental Honors Director Kevin E. Schilbrack, Ph.D., Philosophy and Religion Department Chair Phillip J. Ardoin, Ph.D., Government and Justice Studies Department Chair Parker 2 Acknowledgments I wish to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. Ammon and Dr. Love, my advisors, for providing me with the best encouragement, optimism, feedback, and the occasional necessary laugh. I am also grateful for all the faculty in the Government and Justice Studies department, Philosophy and Religion department, and History department at Appalachian State University, who without their teaching, this would not have been possible. Lastly, I want to thank the Religious Studies Club, the International Relations Association, Kappa Kappa Psi, and TIME, who all pushed me to think politically, gave me the tools to reflect theologically, and taught me about the importance of service. Parker 3 Abstract This project focuses on religious violence conducted in the name of the Abrahamic faiths, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Universal Dimension: William Loftus Hare's Pivotal Contribution To
    Quaker Studies Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 8 2006 The niU versal Dimension: William Loftus Hare's Pivotal Contribution to London Yearly Meeting Tony Adams [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Adams, Tony (2006) "The nivU ersal Dimension: William Loftus aH re's Pivotal Contribution to London Yearly Meeting," Quaker Studies: Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 8. Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/quakerstudies/vol10/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. QUAKER STUDIES 10/2 (2006) [256-280) ADAMS THE UNIVERSAL DIMENSION 257 ISSN 1363-013X UNIVERSALISM WITHIN FRIENDS From the outset, universalism was a significant feature of the Quaker faith. The pos­ sibility of salvation beyond the particularism of the Jewish race that had been voiced by Amos (9:7), and by Paul's assertions (Rom. 9-1 1) that the special call oflsrael was not a privilege but a responsibility, which he envisaged as a re-integration of all man­ THE UNIVERSAL DIMENSION: kind in Christ, was taken up seriously. The divine power or principle of the Holy WILLIAM LOFTUS HARE'S PIVOTAL CONTRIBUTION Spirit was said by George Fox to have been active not only during Old Testament times in Jewish society, but in other cultures too.
    [Show full text]
  • I Challenging Advaitic and Universalist Notions of Hinduism By
    Challenging Advaitic and Universalist Notions of Hinduism by Akshay Gupta Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ David Need, Supervisor ___________________________ Leela Prasad ___________________________ Graham Schweig Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Program in Religion of Duke University 2019 i v ABSTRACT Challenging Advaitic and Universalist Notions of Hinduism by Akshay Gupta Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ David Need, Supervisor ___________________________ Leela Prasad ___________________________ Graham Schweig An abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Program in Religion of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Akshay Gupta 2019 Abstract Within the academic study of Hinduism, there is a tendency to misrepresent Indian religion by portraying it as entirely Advaita Vedānta, the monistic ideology commonly associated with Śaṅkara. By looking at reasons for Advaita Vedānta’s popularity as well as the history of Vaiṣṇavism, this paper will challenge claims that Hinduism is best represented by Advaita Vedānta. Ultimately, what I find is that Hinduism is better used as a broad category for the varieties of diverse Indian religious expression, rather than as a single unified ideology that defines itself in terms of Advaita Vedānta. iv
    [Show full text]