5 Starter Facts About Unitarian Universalism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

5 Starter Facts About Unitarian Universalism 1. Unitarian Universalism welcomes pluralism and diversity in its beliefs and practices, embracing teachings from Eastern and Western religions and philosophies. There are ~250,000 adherents in the United States. 2. Unitarian Universalism was established in 1961 from the merge of the Universalist Church of America (est. 1793), and the American Unitarian Association (est. 1825). The name refers to the oneness of God and the belief that all people gain salvation. 3. Unitarian-Universalists do not have a common creed or doctrine, but they share seven principles viewed as guidance for life and morality. It includes affirmation of the inherent dignity of every person, promotion of justice, equality and compassion, and a free and responsible search for truth and meaning. 4. Because Unitarian Universalism has its roots in Protestant Christianity, the Bible remains an important sacred text for many. However, they also turn to texts from other traditions and cultures around the world for wisdom and spiritual insights. Central to their understanding of scripture and sacred texts is that each text must be understood to be a product of a particular time and place. 5. Believing in God is not an expectation, like most Western religions. Rather, the varying concepts of the divine, or lack thereof, is what uplifts the community in not feeling alone in their personal beliefs. Learn more at: https://www.uua.org/beliefs https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-corter-/unitarian-universalism-wh_b_14174824.htm l These five points are not meant to be comprehensive or authoritative. We hope they encourage you to explore this spirituality more deeply and seek out members of this community to learn about their beliefs in action. In understanding our differences we will better understand our common humanity. June 2018 2101 L St NW, STE:800 Washington, DC 20037-1657 TEL: 202-466-0567 FAX: 202-857-3977 WEB: interfaithalliance.org .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Addressing Fundamentalism by Legal and Spiritual Means
H UMAN R IGHTS & H UMAN W ELFARE Addressing Fundamentalism by Legal and Spiritual Means By Dan Wessner Religion and Humane Global Governance by Richard A. Falk. New York: Palgrave, 2001. 191 pp. Gender and Human Rights in Islam and International Law: Equal before Allah, Unequal before Man? by Shaheen Sardar Ali. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000. 358 pp. Religious Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women edited by Courtney W. Howland. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999. 326 pp. The Islamic Quest for Democracy, Pluralism, and Human Rights by Ahmad S. Moussalli. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2001. 226 pp. The post-Cold War era stands at a crossroads. Some sort of new world order or disorder is under construction. Our choice to move more toward multilateralism or unilateralism is informed well by inter-religious debate and international law. Both disciplines rightly challenge the “post- Enlightenment divide between religion and politics,” and reinvigorate a spiritual-legal dialogue once thought to be “irrelevant or substandard” (Falk: 1-8, 101). These disciplines can dissemble illusory walls between spiritual/sacred and material/modernist concerns, between realpolitik interests and ethical judgment (Kung 1998: 66). They place praxis and war-peace issues firmly in the context of a suffering humanity and world. Both warn as to how fundamentalism may subjugate peace and security to a demagogic, uncompromising quest. These disciplines also nurture a community of speech that continues to find its voice even as others resort to war. The four books considered in this essay respond to the rush and risk of unnecessary conflict wrought by fundamentalists.
[Show full text]
Examining Ritual and Belief in a Unitarian Universalist Congregation Clara M
University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research 2013 Faithful Non-Believers: Examining Ritual and Belief in a Unitarian Universalist Congregation Clara M. Sciortino University of Puget Sound, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Sciortino, Clara M., "Faithful Non-Believers: Examining Ritual and Belief in a Unitarian Universalist Congregation" (2013). Summer Research. Paper 196. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/196 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Faithful Non-Believers: Examining Ritual and Belief in a Unitarian Universalist Congregation Clara Sciortino Advisor: Greta Austin September 24, 2013 Though March 17, 2013 represented my first visit to a Unitarian Universalist church, it didn’t feel at all foreign. Growing up in a United Methodist Church, and visiting several other protestant services when I first arrived in Tacoma, it really felt quite familiar. I was greeted at the door and invited to put on a nametag. As I entered the sanctuary, an usher handed me a hymnal and a bulletin, and a kind older woman sat down next to me, introducing herself and asking me questions about where I went to school. Even the prelude, sung by a choir, was a traditional Christian song, “Zion’s Walls.” With the exception of a few subtle differences, such as the chalice lighting at the beginning, the service mostly felt about the same to me as a traditional protestant service.
[Show full text]
339 Michael J. Mcclymond This Work Broaches the Centuries-Old Debate
Book Reviews 339 Michael J. McClymond, The Devil’s Redemption: A New History and Interpretation of Christian Universalism 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018). xxiv + 1325 pp. $90.00 hardcover. This work broaches the centuries-old debate over universal salvation, bring- ing together careful historical reconstruction of arguments, on both sides, with rigorous theological analysis. Historical theologian Michael McClymond fur- nishes timely perspective into universalism in its many forms, past and present. While a distinct majority throughout Christian history have sought to draw up lines against universalism, there is an increasing number, even among evangel- icals, who gravitate to the possibility that a loving God will finally save every person he has created. In chapter 1 McClymond addresses historic Protestant, Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, evangelical, and Pentecostal-charismatic perspectives. Chapter 2 traces the Western esoteric roots of universalism, originating within ancient Gnosticism and reemerging in the Jewish Kabbalah and Christian Cabala of the Late Medieval and Early Modern periods. The next two chap- ters survey the undeniable influence of the ancient Alexandrian theologian Origen. Chapters 5 and 6 consider the modern resurgence of universalism in the thought of German Lutheran Jakob Böhme and American Protestantism, respectively. Chapter 7 surveys the rise of universalism in the German idealism of Immanuel Kant, Julius Müller, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Georg W.F. Hegel, FriedrichW.J. Schelling, and PaulTillich. Chapter 8 considers the impact of Rus- sian Sophianism in the thought of Vladimir Solovyov, Nicolas Berdyaev, Georges Florovsky, and Sergei Bulgakov. Chapter 9 examines the significance of Karl Barth’s doctrine of universal election and Jürgen Moltmann’s notion of divine passibility.
[Show full text]
Unitarian Universalism for Young Adults
Finding a Spiritual Home Unitarian Universalism for Young Adults Michael Tino Transitions New schools, new jobs, new relationships and new communities—the lives of many young adults are filled with transitions, each of which adds both new possibilities and new needs to our lives. In this time of great change in our lives, we often need a setting that nurtures and grounds us. Unitarian Universalism provides young adults with just such a place. In our congregations and in the wider Unitarian Universalist community, we are simultaneously challenged to rigorously examine our faith and given the freedom to express it. Unitarian Universalism offers us somewhere to ask questions, to engage in dialogue, to meet others on their spiritual journeys, and to find our spiritual home. Unitarian Universalism is important to me because it’s revolutionary, magical, practical, welcoming, uplifting, mine. UU churches are where I find spiritual communities. My leadership is encouraged and nourished, not just by my elders but by my peers as well. I have made precious friendships with fellow young adults in church. I love UU young adults. As a whole, we’re a vibrant, dynamic, caring group of people. —Amy Strano, New York, NY Living Spiritually Are you searching for a community in which to explore spiritual questions without being given a set of “right” answers? Many young adults are. We seek a relevant and living spiritual environment in which we are free to question the answers that others have given us. For some of us, this means developing a faith that passes the tests of reason and logic.
[Show full text]
"Ten Years Later: Fear, Fundamentalism and Unitarian Universalism"
Prairie Unitarian U niversalist Society 2010 Whenona Drive, Madison, WI 53711 * 608-271-8218 * www.uuprairie.org "Ten Years Later: Fear, Fundamentalism and Unitarian Universalism" Today's Order of Service Announcements Green Note Pack a litter free lunch. You can find many Prelude - "Sounds from the Gumdrop Factory," performed by Katherine Liu. reusable lunch kit items at places like Goodwill: cloth napkins, mismatched silverware, and even unusual Welcome and Announcements - Barb Park bags to use as your "lunch box." Then think about saving plastic and glass containers that have good lids Opening Words: America and Islam are not exclusive and to pack your lunch in. You will likely eat better need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share bringing lunch from home, and with a litter-free lunch common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the kit you are also helping the earth. dignity of all human beings. -Barack Obama The Humanist Union meets today after the service. A potluck lunch will start at 11 :45 am, and will be *Hymn #134 (SLT): "Our World Is One World," Doleta followed by a program entitled, "Looking Back, Chapru, accompanist. Looking Forward." September marks 7 years since a Lighting of the Chalice: The wise man in the storm prays t» group of Prairie members decided to form the God, not for safety from danger, but for deliverance from humanist discussion group which subsequently became fear. the Humanist Union of Madison. We will talk about -Ralph. Waldo Emerson our favorite programs over the last seven years, ideas for future programs, and how to best take advantage of Silent Meditation the publicity generated for our group by the Madison Area Coalition of Reason publicity campaign which Story for All Ages we expect to be underway.
[Show full text]
God Is Not a Person (An Argument Via Pantheism)
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (2019) 85:281–296 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9678-x ARTICLE God is not a person (an argument via pantheism) Simon Hewitt1 Received: 22 November 2017 / Accepted: 3 July 2018 / Published online: 6 July 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract This paper transforms a development of an argument against pantheism into an objection to the usual account of God within contemporary analytic philosophy (’Swinburnian theism’). A standard criticism of pantheism has it that pantheists cannot ofer a satisfactory account of God as personal. My paper will develop this criticism along two lines: frst, that personhood requires contentful mental states, which in turn necessitate the membership of a linguistic community, and second that personhood requires limitation within a wider context constitutive of the ’setting’ of the agent’s life. Pantheism can, I argue, satisfy neither criterion of personhood. At this point the tables are turned on the Swinburnian theist. If the pantheist cannot defend herself against the personhood-based attacks, neither can the Swinburnian, and for instructively parallel reasons: for neither doctrine is God in the material world; in the pantheist case God is identical with the world, in the Swinburnian case God transcends it. Either way both the pantheist and the Swinburnian are left with a dilemma: abandon divine personhood or modify the doctrine of God so as to block the move to personhood. Keywords Pantheism · Divine personhood · Apophaticism · Divine language Is God a person? Since the advent of philosophy of religion in the analytic tradi- tion the consensus of opinion has favoured answering this question in the afrma- tive (as we will see in due course).
[Show full text]
The Episcopal Church: Tearing the Fabric of Communion to Shreds
AMERICAN ANGLICAN CO UNCIL THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: TEARING THE FABRIC OF COMMUNION TO SHREDS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?” Psalm 11:3 In the following sections we describe how the leadership of The Episcopal Church has been systematically destroying the foundations of Anglican Christianity within the United States, and tearing the fabric of the Anglican Communion to shreds. Through the following sections, we will demonstrate, through the words of TEC leaders, their actions and their defiance of both the Bible and the instruments of Anglican unity, why orthodox Anglicans in North America were led to form the Anglican Church in North America in order to preserve and promote an Anglicanism that is truly Biblical, missionary and united. Catalogue of Heresies Quoting Episcopal Church leaders denying Jesus as the only way to the Father, denying the divinity and uniqueness of Jesus Christ, denying the Resurrection, denying heaven and hell, denying salvation through the cross of Jesus Christ, denying the authority of Holy Scripture, denying the Creeds, and denying Biblical standards for human sexuality. We also document the fruits of TEC‘s new theology—which include a refusal to reaffirm the historic articles of the Christian faith, syncretism, the promotion of abortion, weakening traditional marriage, promoting same sex blessings and other sexual aberrations, communion for the unbaptized, and accelerating litigation by TEC against the orthodox. We conclude with the heresies of the current Presiding Bishop, in her own words, an analysis that demonstrates her affirmation of the classic heresies of Pelagianism, Marcionism, Pluralism, Universalism and Gnosticism.
[Show full text]
Discovering Unitarian Universalism from Catholic and Jewish Perspectives
Discovering Unitarian Universalism from Catholic and Jewish Perspectives Patrick T. O'Neill and Linda R. Weltner People join Unitarian Universalist congregations from many different religious backgrounds. For some individuals, their childhood religion provided a strong moral or ethical foundation for growing up. For others it continues to offer religious sustenance in their daily lives. For all, Unitarian Universalism is an affirming place for their growing spirituality. Discover how two people from Catholic and Jewish backgrounds learned who they are as individuals and as Unitarian Universalists. From Catholic Roots: A New Religious Home Patrick T. O'Neill People are often startled to meet a Unitarian Universalist minister with a name like Patrick Thomas Aquinas O'Neill. As my name inescapably reveals, I come from a family that is very Irish and devoutly Catholic. Though my own religious journey has taken me on a different spiritual road than that of my immigrant parents, I remain proud of my family heritage and grateful for the deeply religious upbringing my family provided. My education was typical of the American Catholic school system of the 1950s and 1960s. My elementary school teachers were the School Sisters of Notre Dame. I attended a Carmelite prep school for boys, and graduated from a Jesuit college. I was an altar boy until I was sixteen. I attended college from 1965 to 1969 and came of age during that turbulent decade when America's social and religious values were so vehemently tested. As a sincere young Catholic, I struggled as all my friends did during those years with the profound moral upheavals of our time.
[Show full text]
A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model
Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2009 A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model Haejong Je Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Je, Haejong, "A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model" (2009). Dissertations. 70. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/70 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN LIGHT OF HIS ESCHATOLOGICAL MODEL by Haejong Je Adviser: John T. Baldwin ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN LIGHT OF HIS ESCHATOLOGICAL MODEL Name of researcher: Haejong Je Name and degree of faculty adviser: John T. Baldwin, Ph.D. Date approved: April 2009 Introduction to the Problem The philosophy of John Hick, who is famous for his religious pluralism, has received vigorous study in terms of its epistemology, authority, the concept of God, and Christology. However, less attention has been given to his pareschatology. As explained below, initial investigation shows that there is a need for in-depth study of Hick’s religious philosophy in this area.
[Show full text]
Our UU “Source” Statement: It’S Time to Make a Good Thing Better!
Our UU “Source” Statement: It’s Time to Make a Good Thing Better! There is much to admire in the current statement of Unitarian Universalist Principles and Purposes posted on the walls of so many of our houses of worship, on the backs of orders of service, and in other prominent places. I particularly appreciate the thoughtfulness of the section that lists and describes the many “sources of the living tradition we share.” The contents of this list are packed comfortably but also tightly, so tightly that it’s difficult to take them all in at a glance while viewing them through the lens we are accustomed to using: 1) Direct experience of that transcending mystery and wonder, affirmed in all cultures, which moves us to a renewal of the spirit and an openness to the forces which create and uphold life; 2) Words and deeds of prophetic women and men which challenge us to confront powers and structures of evil with justice, compassion, and the transforming power of love; 3) Wisdom from the world's religions which inspires us in our ethical and spiritual life; 4) Jewish and Christian teachings which call us to respond to God's love by loving our neighbors as ourselves; 5) Humanist teachings which counsel us to heed the guidance of reason and the results of science, and warn us against idolatries of the mind and spirit. 6) Spiritual teachings of earth-centered traditions which celebrate the sacred circle of life and instruct us to live in harmony with the rhythms of nature.1 Whenever we take the time to unpack these words and sort them out a little, we are likely to notice something that we missed before.
[Show full text]
Unitarian Universalist Theology Renaissance Module ONLINE
Unitarian Universalist Theology Renaissance Module ONLINE VERSION PARTICIPANT GUIDE By Lynn Ungar and Sara Lewis © 2018 by the Faith Development Office of the UUA, Boston, MA Table of Contents About the Authors; Acknowledgement 3 Overview of Sessions 4 Introduction to the Module 6 Pre-Module Assignments 16 Session 1: What Is Theology? 17 Session 2: Early Unitarianism and Universalism 34 Session 3: Expanding Beyond Christian Roots 40 Session 4: More 20th Century Influences 48 Session 5: 21st Century UU Theology 55 Session 6: Closing Session 59 UU Theology Renaissance Module, ONLINE Participant Guide 2 About the Authors Rev. Dr. Lynn Ungar holds an M.Div. from Starr King School for the Ministry and a D. Min. in religious education from McCormick Theological seminary. She has served as a parish minister in Moscow, Idaho and in Chicago, and as a director of religious education in Fremont and Hayward, California. She currently serves as minister for lifespan learning for the Church of the Larger Fellowship, our online UU congregation (www.questformeaning.org and www.clfuu.org ). Lynn is co-author of the Tapestry of Faith curricula Faithful Journeys and Love Connects Us and author of Sing to the Power. Lynn’s poetry can be found in a variety of publications, including her latest book Bread and Other Miracles. She is the composer of the round, “Come, Come, Whoever You Are,” Hymn 188 in Singing the Living Tradition. Sara Lewis, unchurched in her early years, found Unitarian Universalism in her teen years and has served as Director of Religious Education at the Olympia Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Olympia, Washington since 2008.
[Show full text]
Relativism and Universalism.Pdf
Relativism and Universalism Richard A. Shweder As the moral philosopher David Wong has noted (2006: xi): “The standard characterizations of [moral] relativism make it an easy target and seldom reveal what really motivates people who are attracted to it. Introductory textbooks in ethics frequently portray the view as an extreme variety of subjectivism (or conventionalism) in which anything goes – a person‟s (or group‟s) accepting that something is right makes it right for that person (or group).” This variety of moral relativism pictures human subjectivity in terms of human reactions of both acceptance (feelings of approbation) and rejection (feelings of opprobrium). Its central principle states that approving of some act or customary practice makes it right (good, virtuous, moral) and disapproving of the very same act or customary practice makes it wrong (bad, vicious, immoral); and this is so for any conceivable act or customary practice whether it is eating pork, terminating a pregnancy, drinking alcohol, spanking a child, banning a book, marrying a member of your own sex, marrying more than one member of the opposite sex, walking bare breasted on a public beach, covering yourself with a burqa 1 in the public square, conducting a Bris,2 surgically reshaping the genitals of all the children in ones family regardless of their gender, assisting someone in committing a suicide or immolating yourself on the funeral pyre of your husband. Writing more or less in this vein the anthropologist Ruth Benedict once defined morality as “a convenient term for socially approved habits” (1934). It is not too surprising that this variety of moral relativism is viewed as extreme by many moral philosophers.
[Show full text]