Santa Cruz World Surfing Reserve Stewardship Plan September 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Santa Cruz World Surfing Reserve Stewardship Plan September 2015 SANTA CRUZ WORLD SURFING RESERVE STEWARDSHIP PLAN SEPTEMBER 2015 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………… 4 About Santa Cruz WSR …………………………………………………………………………… 4 WSR Selection Criteria …………………………………………………………………………… 5 Reserve Management ……………………………………………………………………………. 6 World Surfing Reserve Map ……………………………………………………………………… 7 Reserve Stewardship Plan ………………………………………………………………………… 7 Water Quality Action Plan ………………………………………………………………………… 7 Trash & Marine Debris Action Plan ………………………………………………………….. 8 Sea Level Rise Action Plan ………………………………………………………………………. 9 Annex Materials ……………………………………………………………………………………… 11 2 Acknowledgments This Reserve Stewardship Plan represents the collective effort of many valued colleagues and partners. Save the Waves staff would like to particularly appreciate the investment of time and expertise by all of the participants in the 2014 World Surfing Reserve Summit, which was the genesis of this plan. Special appreciation to the World Surfing Reserve Vision Council and Executive Committee for the site selection and Ryan Craig program leadership they provide. Vision Council members include: Vision Council Executive Committee Scott Atkinson, Conservation International Chad Nelsen, Surfrider Foundation Zachary Plopper, Wildcoast Jess Ponting, Center For Surf Research Nik Strong-Cvetich, Save The Waves Coalition Vision Council O’Neill Archives Fernando Aguerre, International Surfing Association Pedro Bicudo, Salvem o Surf Michael Blum, Malibu Surfing Association Tony Butt, University of Plymouth Joao De Macedo, World Surfing League – Big Wave Tour Carlos Antonio Ferrer, Huanchaco World Surfing Reserve Steve Hawk, Sierra Club Magazine Dean LaTourrette, Save The Waves Board of Directors Stéphane Latxague, Surfrider Foundation Europe Santa Cruz Waves Neil Lazarow, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Len Materman, San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority Hugo Tagholm, Surfers Against Sewage 3 Executive Summary In April 2012, Santa Cruz was officially dedicated as a World Surfing Reserve (WSR), globally recognized for its quality of surf, unique environmental characteristics, strong surfing heritage, and local conservation leadership. The Santa Cruz World Surfing Reserve is part of a growing network of surfing protected areas around the world, joining locations in Portugal, Australia, Peru, Mexico, and Chile in the World Surf Reserves Program. World Surfing Reserves is a program of Save The Waves Coalition, a global non-profit headquartered in Santa Cruz County. Figure 1: Pleasure Point at sunset (Photo: Will Henry) The Santa Cruz World Surfing Reserve lies within the heart of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, encompassing about seven of the sanctuary’s 276 miles of coastline, including world- renowned right-hand point breaks Steamer Lane and Pleasure Point. In all, some two dozen surf spots— points, reef, and beachbreaks, both famous and lesser known—fall within the reserve’s boundaries. However there are some key challenges that continue to affect this coastline, including water quality, trash/marine debris, and sea-level rise. The Santa Cruz WSR is managed by a Local Stewardship Council (LSC) and Save The Waves Coalition. This group, comprised of local surfers, environmentalists, elected officials, and business leaders, manages the WSR in collaboration with other environmental, community and stakeholder groups whose missions align. The Santa Cruz WSR serves as a hub for coastal conservation efforts and serves to convene and integrate existing environmental efforts with the goal of preserving the waves and coastal resources of Santa Cruz. About Santa Cruz WSR Santa Cruz has earned the sheltered status of a World Surfing Reserve because of its diverse mix of surf breaks, its pervasive and deep-rooted surf culture, and its thriving but fragile coldwater habitat. Most surfers who’ve spent any time in Santa Cruz agree that the quality, consistency and aesthetic appeal of its waves make it the best all-around surf town in the continental United States. The reserve’s seven miles of serrated coast feature more than two dozen quality spots—from one of the West Coast’s best longboarding waves to a heaving deepwater peak where big-wave surfers train. The wide array of points, reefs and beachbreaks channel Pacific swells from all directions, and the 4 prevailing winds blow favorably year-round. Santa Cruz’s surf roots date back to 1885, when three Hawaiian princes rode hand-hewn redwood planks in waves breaking at the San Lorenzo Rivermouth—the first documented surf session on the American mainland. A small but devoted core of local surfers kept the sport alive through the first half of the 20th Century, but it wasn’t until surf fever swept from coast to coast in the 1960s that surfing became forever woven into the very fabric of the community. In the decades since, innovative Santa Cruz surfers and manufacturers—from wetsuit designers to surfboard manufacturers—have influenced wave riders worldwide. Today, Santa Cruz is home to thousands of surfers, many of whom are devoted to protecting the coast from the ongoing threats it faces. The success of these coastal stewards is evident to anyone who ventures near the coast here on a day when the sun is out and the waves are up. From Natural Bridges to Opal Cliffs, the surf zone buzzes with locals and visitors alike—all vying for waves along Santa Cruz’s world-class coastline. WSR Selection Criteria World Surfing Reserves are selected by a governing ‘Vision Council’ consisting of academics, environmental leaders, surf elders, and scientists. Their selection of Santa Cruz as a World Surfing Reserve was based on the following criteria: i. Surf Quality and Consistency - At least 23 consistent surf breaks are sited along this coast, including the world-class breaks of Steamer Lane and Pleasure Point. Most are reef or beach breaks with a few outstanding point breaks, and almost all naturally break right within this zone. Winter is always the best time for surfing consistent waves, and the breaks are rated from “expert” to “beginner,” so surfers of all ages and levels can find a suitable wave in the area. ii. Environmental Characteristics - Santa Cruz is a marine protected area located within the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Santa Cruz’s kelp forest, the largest in the nation, is home to many sea otters, seals, sea lions and varieties of sea birds, sharks and migratory whales. Each spring when the northwest winds blow, cold, nutrient-rich waters rise up out of submarine canyons, nourishing lush growths of marine algae and surface plankton blooms. These provide sustenance for the rich marine biodiversity found along the Santa Cruz coast and make the surf zone a truly wild and awe inspiring environment. 5 iii. Surf Culture and History - Santa Cruz proudly claims to be the location of the very first board surfing ever in North America, at the “Rivermouth” break in 1885, as documented in The Santa Cruz Surf Museum. When three visiting Hawaiian princes had surfboards milled from local redwood and demonstrated surfboard wave riding for the first time, Santa Cruz was immediately established forever as the birthplace of surfing on the continent. The Santa Cruz Surf Club Figure 2: Santa Cruz is the original 'surf city' where the sport of surfing was first practiced in continental USA by three Hawaiian formed in 1936 and helped solidify a Princes in 1885 (Photo: Harry Mayo Collection) strong surf culture that continues today as a key part of the area’s identity, with many local residents embracing surfing as a central part of their lifestyle. iv. Local Capacity – Santa Cruz is a conservation minded coastal community that has shown strong support for their WSR designation. In 2014, the Santa Cruz WSR hosted an all day summit that convened over 50 local leaders from nonprofits, the scientific community, and local government to collaboratively steward the WSR. The Santa Cruz WSR Stewardship Plan is an outcome of the WSR Summit. Reserve Management Each WSR is managed by a Local Stewardship Council (LSC), which provides WSR oversight and governance. The Santa Cruz LSC is a cross section of the local surf and environmental communities, which meets regularly to steer the activities of the WSR. The Santa Cruz LSC members include: Hilary Bryant, Former Councilmember, City of Santa Cruz Brian Kilpatrick, Director Marketing/Communications, O’Neill Wetsuits Jim Littlefield, West Coast Director, Surfers Environmental Alliance John Leopold, Supervisor, County of Santa Cruz Jane McKenzie, Santa Cruz Longboard Union Nick Mucha, Save The Waves Coalition Mark Stone, California Assemblymember Nik Strong-Cvetich, Save The Waves Coalition Dan Young, Santa Cruz Surfing Club Preservation Society 6 World Surfing Reserve Map Reserve Stewardship Plan In April 2014, Save The Waves Coalition and the Local Stewardship Council of the World Surfing Reserve teamed up on the occasion of the 2nd anniversary of the dedication of Santa Cruz as a World Surfing Reserve to convene over 50 key community stakeholders in an action-oriented conference to address environmental challenges to Santa Cruz’s surf resources. Focus groups concentrated on addressing three key challenges; water quality, trash issues, and sea level rise. Each of the focus groups identified the ‘hot spots’ within the WSR, identified root causes of the issue, and then proposed key strategies and concrete actions to mitigate the threats.
Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary 1
    Business Plan All Contents Copyright 2004 Surfparks LLC Technical Questions, Contact: John Doe; [555] 555-5555 Investor Information, Contact: Jane Doe; [555] 555-5555 THIS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES Proprietary and Confidential For learning purposes, the financial data has been altered or changed to reflect students’ participation and discussion in this course. For privacy purposes, the names of individuals have been changed or removed. 0 of 36 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 1 II. Company Overview 3 III. Market Analysis 5 IV. Marketing and Sales Plan 11 V. Operations 17 VI. Management Team 23 VII. Financials 25 VIII. Funds Required and Uses 29 Appendices: Appendix A: Market Demand Survey 30 Appendix B: Web Survey Comments 34 Appendix C: Market Research Background 36 0 of 36 Executive Summary Project Summary Surfparks Holdings (SPH) is raising $10 million to build, own, and operate the facility, located at Festival Bay, a 1.1 million square foot mall on International Drive in Orlando, Florida. Key anchor tenants at Festival Bay include Pro Shops, Skatepark, Surf Shop, and a 20-screen theater. The Surfpark will be located between the theater and the skatepark, with a themed, high-visibility entrance from the parking lot and an interior mall entrance via the Surfpark Pro Shop and restaurant. Key Surfpark Features/Attractions: • Large Surf Pool (4-8 foot waves, 70-100 yard rides) for intermediate-advanced surfers/bodyboarders. • Training Surf Pool (3-4 foot waves, 30-35 yard rides) for beginners-novice surfers/bodyboarders. • Flowrider™ standing-wave attraction for non-surfers. • Surf School and High Performance Training Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Nsn 11-12-14.Indd
    IS BUGG “E Ala Na Moku Kai Liloloa” • D AH S F W R E E N E! “Mahalo to all our E • veterans, past, present R S O I N H and future” C S E H 1 T 9 R Fort Bliss 7 O 0 Page 27 N NORTH SHORE NEWS November 12, 2014 VOLUME 31, NUMBER 23 Reef Day 1, ASP/Cestari Florence, Sunset, ASP/Cestari Trophy, Pipe, ASP/Cestari PROUDLY PUBLISHED IN Permit No. 1479 No. Permit Hale‘iwa, Hawai‘i Honolulu, Hawaii Honolulu, Home of U.S. POSTAGE PAID POSTAGE U.S. STANDARD Hale‘iwa, HI 96712 HI Hale‘iwa, Vans Triple PRE-SORTED 66-437 Kamehameha Hwy., Suite 210 Suite Hwy., Kamehameha 66-437 Crown of Surfing Page 2 www.northshorenews.com November 12, 2014 Danny Fuller, Kauai, winner HIC Pro Photo: Banzai Productions The final day of the HIC Pro had an exciting finish ◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆ that saw a long overdue win for Kauai’s Danny Fuller. ◆ ◆ This was the first win for him at Sunset in 15 years. Fuller, ◆ ◆ 32, was the only backsider in the all Hawaiian final and ◆ The Hale‘iwa Family Dental Center, Ltd. ◆ his precise attack on the tricky sometimes closing out ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ Sunset battle ground earned him the victory and a spot in ◆ ◆ the prestigious Vans Triple Crown of Surfing. Fuller won ◆ ◆ $15,000.00 for his efforts and was very emotional at the ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ awards. “My Mom has sacrificed so much for me along ◆ ◆ the way, so to dedicate this win to her means so much,” ◆ presents ◆ Fuller said. Fuller has only surfed in the three events of ◆ ◆ the Vans Triple Crown once and and was injured right ◆ “Comfort Dentistry” ◆ ◆ ◆ before it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragicomedy of the Surfers'commons
    THE TRAGICOMEDY OF THE SURFERS ’ COMMONS DANIEL NAZER * I INTRODUCTION Ideally, the introduction to this article would contain two photos. One would be a photo of Lunada Bay. Lunada Bay is a rocky, horseshoe-shaped bay below a green park in the Palos Verdes neighbourhood of Los Angeles. It is a spectacular surf break, offering long and powerful rides. The other photograph would be of horrific injuries sustained by Nat Young, a former world surfing champion. Nat Young was severely beaten after a dispute that began as an argument over who had priority on a wave. These two images would help a non-surfer understand the stakes involved when surfers compete for waves. The waves themselves are an extraordinary resource lying at the centre of many surfers’ lives. The high value many surfers place on surfing means that competition for crowded waves can evoke strong emo- tions. At its worst, this competition can escalate to serious assaults such as that suffered by Nat Young. Surfing is no longer the idiosyncratic pursuit of a small counterculture. In fact, the popularity of surfing has exploded to the point where it is not only within the main- stream, it is big business. 1 And while the number of surfers continues to increase, * Law Clerk for Chief Judge William K. Sessions, III of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. J.D. Yale Law School, 2004. I am grateful to Jeffrey Rachlinski, Robert Ellickson, An- thony Kronman, Oskar Liivak, Jason Byrne, Brian Fitzgerald and Carol Rose for comments and encour- agement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Toolbox to Combat Shark Risk
    Living with Sharks A Toolbox to Combat Shark Risk "A better understanding of sharks, the technology available today and a collective effort to manage our activities, should enable us to share the ocean with sharks." H.S.H. Prince Albert II of Monaco The Oceanographic Institute is Reaching beyond the impasse we see pursuing its aim of bringing about a in by the idea of confrontation between reconsideration of our relationship with man and animals, it offers a wide range sharks through the development of a of solutions that are either already in toolbox. existence or under development to address the risk and provide practical, The result of an animated exchange proven or promising alternatives. It between international experts, This shows that an organised and peaceful toolbox, result of an animated exchange cohabitation with sharks is now possible. between international experts, is designed for authorities and actors This effort to share the oceans with faced with the coexistence of human sharks must be at the forefront of a activity and potentially dangerous shark broader commitment to recognise the species, as well as all those affected importance of these large predators and by this risk or simply interested in protect them through the strengthened cohabitation issues between humans supervision of their fishing. and wildlife. Innovative solutions exist today to meet shark risk without decimating these animals that are essential to the health of the oceans. Public authorities have a fundamental role to play to: Develop our knowledge of Clearly and transparently Implement protection the habits and peculiarities inform sea users of the risks measures in certain areas of sharks and enable a more they incur by implementing (monitoring, human/shark relevant and appropriate “shark forecasts” if separation, deterrent/ analysis of the potential risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop 1: Technology for Change
    Workshop 1: Technology for Change Moderated By Al Ramadan, Play Bigger Evolution of Technology for Ocean / Land Interface 1872 1922-39 1961 1992 2004 Wireline Acoustic Scripps TOPEX / Google acquires Sounding Echo Deep Poseidon Google Earth Machine Sounders Tow 1914 1941-45 1982 1995 Fessenden WWII NOAA Declassification 2010 Oscillator Shoran Pacific Of Geosat satellite Census of Marine Array radar altimetry data Life Driving an explosion in the availability of data Sometimes leading to unexpected results Researchers decided to tap the vast amount of data generated by anti-collision beacons on ships —some 22 billion messages from 2012 to 2016. In 2016 alone, these ships traveled more than 460 million kilometers—about five times the distance from Earth to the sun. Our Panel Matt Mulrennan Director, Ocean Initiative, XPRIZE Technology for Change Matthew Mulrennan Director, Ocean Initiative, XPRIZE Co-Founder, CEO, KOLOSSAL @kolossaloceans [email protected] “The problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by skeptics or cynics whose horizons are limited by the obvious realities. We need people who can dream of things that never were.” -John F. Kennedy SOME OF OUR MOST SIGNIFICANT GRAND CHALLENGES INVOLVE OCEANS XPRIZE Ocean Initiative A ten-year commitment to conduct five ocean XPRIZE competitions by 2020, and engage in thought leadership, outreach and impact. The vision is to make the ocean Healthy, Valued, and Understood. Inspires solutions to ocean Grand Challenges. Funding provided by Wendy Schmidt starting in 2013. The $2 Million Global Competition to Improve Our Understanding of Ocean Acidification PUBLIC RELATIONS WORKSHOP SUMMARIES • Challenges and opportunities for accomplishing the shared vision: • culture, interoperability, valley of death, improving access to data and data quality, better ‘So much models and forecasting tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting the Lifestyle Marketing and Sponsorship of Female Surfers
    Making Waves: Contesting the Lifestyle Marketing and Sponsorship of Female Surfers Author Franklin, Roslyn Published 2012 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Education and Professional Studies DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2170 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367960 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au MAKING WAVES Making waves: Contesting the lifestyle marketing and sponsorship of female surfers Roslyn Franklin DipTPE, BEd, MEd School of Education and Professional Studies Griffith University Gold Coast campus Submitted in fulfilment of The requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2012 MAKING WAVES 2 Abstract The surfing industry is a multi-billion dollar a year global business (Gladdon, 2002). Professional female surfers, in particular, are drawing greater media attention than ever before and are seen by surf companies as the perfect vehicle to develop this global industry further. Because lifestyle branding has been developed as a modern marketing strategy, this thesis examines the lifestyle marketing practices of the three major surfing companies Billabong, Rip Curl and Quicksilver/Roxy through an investigation of the sponsorship experiences of fifteen sponsored female surfers. The research paradigm guiding this study is an interpretive approach that applies Doris Lessing’s (1991) concept of conformity and Michel Foucault’s (1979) notion of surveillance and the technologies of the self. An ethnographic approach was utilised to examine the main research purpose, namely to: determine the impact of lifestyle marketing by Billabong, Rip Curl and Quicksilver/Roxy on sponsored female surfers.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 25 / No.2 / April 09
    VOLUME 24 / NO.1 / JANUARY 08 VOLUME 25 / NO.2 / APRIL 09 111 TIDE CHARTS The Surfrider Foundation is a non-profi t environmental organization dedicated to the protection and enjoyment of the world’s oceans, waves and beaches, for TRACKING THE EBB AND FLOW OF all people, through conservation, activism, research and education. Publication of The Surfrider Foundation COASTAL ENVIRONMENTALISM A Non-Profit Environmental Organization P.O. Box 6010 San Clemente, CA 92674-6010 Phone: (949) 492-8170 / (800) 743-SURF (7873) Web: www.surfrider.org / E-mail: [email protected] 111 victories since 1/06. The Surfrider Foundation is striving to win 150 environmental campaigns by 2010. For a list of these victories please go to: 111 www.surfrider.org/whoweare6.asp Chief Executive Offi cer California Policy Coordinator Jim Moriarty Joe Geever Chief Operating Offi cer Washington Policy Coordinator Michelle C. Kremer, Esq. Jody Kennedy Director of Chapters Ocean Ecosystem Manager Edward J. Mazzarella Pete Stauffer Environmental Director Oregon Policy Coordinator Chad Nelsen Gus Gates Director of Marketing & Communications Save Trestles Coordinator Matt McClain Stefanie Sekich Director of Development Ventura Watershed Coordinator Steve Blank Paul Jenkin Assistant Environmental Director Controller Mark Rauscher Toni Craw Now that is one big “bug!” SeaGen, the world’s largest tidal turbine, was Direct Mail Manager Accounting Assistant installed off the coast of northern Ireland. Jenna Holland Ryan Johnson Global Grants Manager Cash Receipts/Mail Order Lori A.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Report
    2017 / 2018 IMPACT REPORT 02 01 letter from our director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ➔ LETTER FROM OUR DIRECTOR 2 ➔ VICTORIES AT A GLANCE 3 ➔ ABOUT SAVE THE WAVES 4 ➔ WHY SURFING? 6 ➔ PROTECTED AREAS 10 ➔ ECONOMICS 11 ➔ DIRECT ACTION 15 ➔ GLOBAL WAVE CONFERENCE 17 ➔ SAVE THE WAVES FILM FESTIVAL 19 ➔ FINANCES 21 ➔ ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 23 ➔ PARTNERS AND DONORS 02 LETTER FROM OUR DIRECTOR Dear Save The Waves Supporter, As you know, surf ecosystems are perhaps the most In the last two years we saw some of our biggest amazing places on earth. With some of the highest successes using this formula. From acquiring biodiversity, surf ecosystems embody a special and transferring the first piece of land to a local relationship between the ocean, surrounding foundation at Chile’s Punta de Lobos (a protected beaches, watersheds, plants, animals and people. area), to removing thousands of pounds of marine These unique interfaces between land and sea also debris at Isla Todos Santos in Baja (stewardship), to produce breaking waves - one of nature’s greatest defeating Donald Trump’s seawall for a second time miracles. in Ireland (mobilization) - these are just a few of our proudest accomplishments. We connect to the ocean and to each other in these unique places. Millions of us surf, swim, dive, paddle This report is a snapshot of our impact over the and thrive there. We depend on surf ecosystems for last two years that we will scale across the globe to our jobs and livelihoods, and so many more have 1,000 places with your help and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California
    Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California by Michael L. Blum Date: Approved: Dr. Michael K. Orbach, Adviser Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University May 2015 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... viii LIST OF DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................ x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. STUDY APPROACH: A TOTAL ECOLOGY OF SURFING ................................................. 5 2.1 The Biophysical Ecology ...................................................................................................... 5 2.2 The Human Ecology ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surfrider Foundation FAQ
    Global Headquarters P.O. Box 6010 San Clemente, CA USA 92674-6010 Phone: (949) 492 8170 Fax: (949) 492 8142 Email: [email protected] www.surfrider.org Surfrider Foundation FAQ When and where were you founded? The Surfrider Foundation was founded in 1984 by a handful of visionary surfers in Malibu, California. 2014 marked the organization’s 30th anniversary. What is the Surfrider Foundation? The Surfrider Foundation is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit grassroots environmental organization dedicated to the protection and enjoyment of the world’s ocean, waves and beaches through a powerful activist network. Today, the organization is measurably stronger, with more force and movement than ever before. It has 84 chapters, plus 30 high school and college clubs, and more than 250,000 supporters, volunteers and activists around the country. What does the Surfrider Foundation do? The Surfrider Foundation’s chapter volunteers focus their efforts on issues in coastal communities, where the land meets the sea. Issues include pollution and water contamination, irresponsible coastal development, coastal erosion, loss of beach access and threats to healthy oceans. While Surfrider is currently involved in more than a 100 active campaigns at the local, state and national levels, the size and impact of each varies and can endure for years. Armed with a model to defend the coast, it has achieved more than 300 coastal victories (and counting) since 2006. What is the structure of the foundation? The Surfrider Foundation’s Global Headquarters is located in San Clemente, Calif. In 2005, the organization started placing staff regionally in Wash., Ore., Calif., HI, the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Fla.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Literacy and Surfing
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Ocean Literacy and Surfing: Understanding How Interactions in Coastal Ecosystems Inform Blue Space User’s Awareness of the Ocean Natalie Fox 1, Jamie Marshall 2 and Dorothy Jane Dankel 3,* 1 Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK; [email protected] 2 School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, 9 Sighthill Court, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK; [email protected] 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, 5020 Bergen, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Intergovernmental policy is targeting public ocean literacy to help achieve the societal changes needed to reach a sustainable ocean agenda within a 10-year timeframe. To create a culture of care for the ocean, which is under threat from Anthropocentric pressures, informed ocean citizens are central to upholding meaningful actions and best practices. This research focuses on recreational ocean users, specifically surfers and how their blue space activities may inform understanding of ocean processes and human-ocean interconnections. The Ocean Literacy Principles were used to assess ocean awareness through surfing interactions. An online survey questionnaire was completed by 249 participants and reduced to a smaller sample focus group. Qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated to develop further understanding of surfer experiences, using the social-ecological Citation: Fox, N.; Marshall, J.; systems framework to model surfing outcomes. The results found that surfers indeed receive ocean Dankel, D.J. Ocean Literacy and literacy benefits, specifically three out of the seven Ocean Literacy Principles and that ocean literacy Surfing: Understanding How is a direct benefit many surfers in the sample group receive.
    [Show full text]
  • A Southern California Surfer's Perspective on Marine Spatial Planning
    Volume 31 Issue 2 Article 1 5-13-2020 A Southern California Surfer's Perspective On Marine Spatial Planning Edwin C. Kisiel III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Edwin C. Kisiel III, A Southern California Surfer's Perspective On Marine Spatial Planning, 31 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 225 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol31/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Kisiel: A Southern California Surfer's Perspective On Marine Spatial Plan 2020] A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SURFER’S PERSPECTIVE ON MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING EDWIN C. KISIEL III* ABSTRACT Increasing intensity in the use of ocean spaces and coastal development presents a threat to recreational uses of the ocean, such as surfing, diving, and snorkeling. Ocean recreational use brings an immense economic benefit to coastal communities. Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning provides a way to protect ocean recreational uses that cannot be replicated elsewhere. There are current legal authorities that permit state and federal agencies to conduct Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning. However, there are im- provements that could be made. This Article makes several recommendations of ways to implement Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning to protect ocean recreational resources from destruction and degradation from competing ocean uses and coastal development.
    [Show full text]