Idelalisib Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Hsct) in B Cell Derived Malignancies: a Phase 1 Double Blinded Randomized Placebo Toxicity Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Idelalisib Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Hsct) in B Cell Derived Malignancies: a Phase 1 Double Blinded Randomized Placebo Toxicity Trial Johns Hopkins Protocol ID: J1633 IND: 131805 IDELALISIB POST ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT (HSCT) IN B CELL DERIVED MALIGNANCIES: A PHASE 1 DOUBLE BLINDED RANDOMIZED PLACEBO TOXICITY TRIAL Principal Investigator: Douglas E. Gladstone, MD Associate Professor of Oncology CRB I, Room 287 1650 Orleans Street Baltimore, MD 21287 [email protected] Co-Investigators: Javier Bolanos Meade, MD Richard Jones, MD Richard Ambinder. MD Lode Swinnen, MD Statisticians: Marianna Zahurak Study Site: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins IRB Number: IRB00157704 IND: 131805 Version Date: February 3, 2020 Version Date: February 3, 2020 Page 1 of 31 Johns Hopkins Protocol ID: J1633 IND: 131805 Version Date: February 3, 2020 Page 2 of 31 Johns Hopkins Protocol ID: J1633 IND: 131805 CONTENTS 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Hypothesis ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Primary Endpoint ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Secondary Endpoint ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Tertiary Endpoints ......................................................................................................................... 6 3. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1. Inclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Exclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.3. Enrollment ..................................................................................................................................... 7 4. Study Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.1. Premature Discontinuation of Study Therapy ............................................................................... 7 4.2. Premature Termination of a participant from the study .............................................................. 8 4.3. Table 1. Schedule of Assessments ................................................................................................ 9 5. Known Toxicities and Dose Adjustments ...................................................................................... 9 5.1. Known toxicities of idelalisib ......................................................................................................... 9 5.2. Dose adjustment of Idelalisib ...................................................................................................... 11 Pneumonitis .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Hepatotoxicity ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Diarrhea..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia ........................................................................................................ 12 Late Onset Neutropenia (LON) .................................................................................................................. 12 6. Study Statistics ............................................................................................................................ 12 7. Correlative Studies ...................................................................................................................... 15 7.1 Rationale and outline of correlative studies ............................................................................... 15 7.2 Analysis of Correlative Endpoints…………………………………………………..…………………………………..…..23 7.3 OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR SPECIMEN COLLECTION.......................................................................... 16 8. Risks ............................................................................................................................................. 19 8.1. IDELALISIB RISKS ............................................................................................................................. 19 8.2. RISK MINIMIZATION ....................................................................................................................... 19 Version Date: February 3, 2020 Page 3 of 31 Johns Hopkins Protocol ID: J1633 IND: 131805 9. Adverse Events….. ................................................................................................................... .. 20 9.1. Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 20 9.2. Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 20 9.3. Collecting and Recording Adverse Events ................................................................................... 21 9.4. Grading and Attribution of Adverse Events ................................................................................ 22 Attribution Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 22 9.5. Reporting Serious Adverse Events .............................................................................................. 23 10. Ethical, regulatory, and administrative considerations .............................................................. 23 10.1. Statement of Compliance ............................................................................................................ 23 10.2. Informed Consent........................................................................................................................ 23 10.3. Privacy and Confidentiality .......................................................................................................... 24 10.4. INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW .............................................................................................................. 24 10.5. Monitoring plan ........................................................................................................................... 24 11. References ................................................................................................................................... 24 12. Appendix 1-4 ............................................................................................................................... 27 12.1. Study Calendar…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……28 Version Date: February 3, 2020 Page 4 of 31 Johns Hopkins Protocol ID: J1633 IND: 131805 1. INTRODUCTION For all relapsed B cell derived hematologic malignancies, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo BMT) is often the most definitive curative intent therapy. Historically, there have been four obstacles decreasing overall survival (OS) associated with allo BMT: preparative conditioning toxicity, donor availability, graft-versus- host-disease (GVHD) and disease relapse. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have dramatically reduced alloBMT toxicity and have expanded the use of this therapy to patients up to 75 years of age.(1-3) The use of alternative donors has resulted in an average of 2.7 donors for each patient in Johns Hopkins University.(4) The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide has reduced the incidence of Grade III-IV GVHD to 6% - 11%.(5-7) However, disease relapse after successful engraftment during allo BMT remains the limiting factor for improving overall survival. (5, 6, 8) Currently, in order to improve OS, the BMT program at JHH has recently focused on the introduction of anti- neoplastic therapy post transplantation. We use the allo HSCT as a platform to allow a new intolerant immune system to interact with a post allo HSCT biologic or therapeutic intervention. Currently, to improve overall survival, the focus of the BMT program at JHH the introduction of anti-neoplastic therapy post transplantation: where the allo BMT serves as a platform to allowing a new intolerant immune system to interact with the post allo BMT intervention. The importance of post BMT therapy has been made evident with tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) in Ph+ ALL and Ph+ CML, where patients who had disease progression while on TKI therapy pre- allo BMT enjoy marked improvement in OS when TKI is part of a maintenance program (9-12); the use of DNA hypomethylation agents after allo BMT for relapsed myeloid malignances (13); or the use of rituximab after allo BMT in follicular lymphoma (PMID 26183076). At JHH we are currently, utilizing post allo BMT: TKI in Ph+ leukemia’s, sorafenib and other multi-kinase inhibitors in FLT3-ITD AML, and 5-azacytidine in MDS patients.
Recommended publications
  • Expanded and Activated Allogeneic NK Cells Are Cytotoxic Against B
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Expanded and activated allogeneic NK cells are cytotoxic against B‑chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B‑CLL) cells with sporadic cases of resistance Tania Calvo1,8, Chantal Reina‑Ortiz1,8, David Giraldos1, María Gascón1, Daniel Woods1, Judit Asenjo2, Joaquín Marco‑Brualla1, Gemma Azaceta3, Isabel Izquierdo4, Luis Palomera3, Diego Sánchez‑Martínez5,6, Isabel Marzo1, Javier Naval1, Carlos Vilches2, Martín Villalba5,6 & Alberto Anel1,7* Adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer (NK) cells is becoming a credible immunotherapy for hematological malignancies. In the present work, using an optimized expansion/activation protocol of human NK cells, we generate expanded NK cells (eNK) with increased expression of CD56 and NKp44, while maintaining that of CD16. These eNK cells exerted signifcant cytotoxicity against cells from 34 B‑CLL patients, with only 1 sample exhibiting resistance. This sporadic resistance did not correlate with match between KIR ligands expressed by the eNK cells and the leukemic cells, while cells with match resulted sensitive to eNK cells. This suggests that KIR mismatch is not relevant when expanded NK cells are used as efectors. In addition, we found two examples of de novo resistance to eNK cell cytotoxicity during the clinical course of the disease. Resistance correlated with KIR‑ligand match in one of the patients, but not in the other, and was associated with a signifcant increase in PD‑L1 expression in the cells from both patients. Treatment of one of these patients with idelalisib correlated with the loss of PD‑L1 expression and with re‑sensitization to eNK cytotoxicity. We confrmed the idelalisib‑induced decrease in PD‑L1 expression in the B‑CLL cell line Mec1 and in cultured cells from B‑CLL patients.
    [Show full text]
  • BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021
    Page 1 of 65 BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021 DEFINITIONS Class I Reimbursed for active cancer or approved treatment or approved indication only. Reimbursed for approved indications only. Completion of the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Application (formerly Undesignated Indication Form) is necessary to Restricted Funding (R) provide the appropriate clinical information for each patient. NOTES 1. BC Cancer will reimburse, to the Communities Oncology Network hospital pharmacy, the actual acquisition cost of a Benefit Drug, up to the maximum price as determined by BC Cancer, based on the current brand and contract price. Please contact the OSCAR Hotline at 1-888-355-0355 if more information is required. 2. Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) code only applicable to Class I drugs where indicated. 3. Intrahepatic use of chemotherapy drugs is not reimbursable unless specified. 4. For queries regarding other indications not specified, please contact the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Office at 604.877.6000 x 6277 or [email protected] DOSAGE TUMOUR PROTOCOL DRUG APPROVED INDICATIONS CLASS NOTES FORM SITE CODES Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer using abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUMCSPABI* R Abiraterone and Prednisone Palliative Therapy for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUPABI R Using Abiraterone and prednisone acitretin capsule Lymphoma reversal of early dysplastic and neoplastic stem changes LYNOS I first-line treatment of epidermal
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Based Perturbation Screen Uncovers Synergistic Drug Combinations in Burkitt Lymphoma Received: 17 May 2018 K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Drug-based perturbation screen uncovers synergistic drug combinations in Burkitt lymphoma Received: 17 May 2018 K. Tomska1, R. Kurilov2,3, K. S. Lee1, J. Hüllein1, M. Lukas1, L. Sellner 5, T. Walther1, Accepted: 30 July 2018 L. Wagner1, M. Oleś 4, B. Brors2, W. Huber4 & T. Zenz1,6 Published: xx xx xxxx Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma associated with MYC translocation. Here, we describe drug response profling of 42 blood cancer cell lines including 17 BL to 32 drugs targeting key cancer pathways and provide a systematic study of drug combinations in BL cell lines. Based on drug response, we identifed cell line specifc sensitivities, i.e. to venetoclax driven by BCL2 overexpression and partitioned subsets of BL driven by response to kinase inhibitors. In the combination screen, including BET, BTK and PI3K inhibitors, we identifed synergistic combinations of PI3K and BTK inhibition with drugs targeting Akt, mTOR, BET and doxorubicin. A detailed comparison of PI3K and BTKi combinations identifed subtle diferences, in line with convergent pathway activity. Most synergistic combinations were identifed for the BET inhibitor OTX015, which showed synergistic efects for 41% of combinations including inhibitors of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling. The strongest synergy was observed for the combination of the CDK 2/7/9 inhibitor SNS032 and OTX015. Our data provide a landscape of drug combination efects in BL and suggest that targeting CDK and BET could provide a novel vulnerability of BL. Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which is driven by the character- istic translocation of the MYC oncogene1,2.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Temsirolimus and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Lymphomas by Ajay Major, Justin Kline, Theodore G
    Phase I/II clinical trial of temsirolimus and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphomas by Ajay Major, Justin Kline, Theodore G. Karrison, Paul A.S. Fishkin, Amy S. Kimball, Adam M. Petrich, Sreenivasa Nattam, Krishna Rao, Bethany G. Sleckman, Kenneth Cohen, Koen van Besien, Aaron P. Rapoport, and Sonali M. Smith Received: April 18, 2021. Accepted: July 22, 2021. Citation: Ajay Major, Justin Kline, Theodore G. Karrison, Paul A.S. Fishkin, Amy S. Kimball, Adam M. Petrich, Sreenivasa Nattam, Krishna Rao, Bethany G. Sleckman, Kenneth Cohen, Koen van Besien, Aaron P. Rapoport and Sonali M. Smith. Phase I/II clinical trial of temsirolimus and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphomas. Haematologica. 2021 Jul 29. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278853. [Epub ahead of print] Publisher's Disclaimer. E-publishing ahead of print is increasingly important for the rapid dissemination of science. Haematologica is, therefore, E-publishing PDF files of an early version of manuscripts that have completed a regular peer review and have been accepted for publication. E-publishing of this PDF file has been approved by the authors. After having E-published Ahead of Print, manuscripts will then undergo technical and English editing, typesetting, proof correction and be presented for the authors' final approval; the final version of the manuscript will then appear in a regular issue of the journal. All legal disclaimers that apply to the journal also pertain to this production process. Phase I/II TEM/LEN clinical trial Phase I/II clinical trial of temsirolimus and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphomas Ajay Major1; Justin Kline1; Theodore G.
    [Show full text]
  • Microtubule-Actin Crosslinking Factor 1 and Plakins As Therapeutic Drug Targets
    Tennessee State University Digital Scholarship @ Tennessee State University Biology Faculty Research Department of Biological Sciences 1-26-2018 Microtubule-Actin Crosslinking Factor 1 and Plakins as Therapeutic Drug Targets Quincy A. Quick Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.tnstate.edu/biology_fac Part of the Pharmacology Commons Recommended Citation Quick, Q.A. Microtubule-Actin Crosslinking Factor 1 and Plakins as Therapeutic Drug Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020368 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biological Sciences at Digital Scholarship @ Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship @ Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Microtubule-Actin Crosslinking Factor 1 and Plakins as Therapeutic Drug Targets Quincy A. Quick Department of Biological Sciences, Tennessee State University, 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd, Nashville, TN 37209, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(615) 963-5768 Received: 11 December 2017; Accepted: 23 January 2018; Published: 26 January 2018 Abstract: Plakins are a family of seven cytoskeletal cross-linker proteins (microtubule-actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF), bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG1) desmoplakin, envoplakin, periplakin, plectin, epiplakin) that network the three major filaments that comprise the cytoskeleton. Plakins have been found to be involved in disorders and diseases of the skin, heart, nervous system, and cancer that are attributed to autoimmune responses and genetic alterations of these macromolecules. Despite their role and involvement across a spectrum of several diseases, there are no current drugs or pharmacological agents that specifically target the members of this protein family.
    [Show full text]
  • Zydelig, INN-Idelalisib
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Zydelig 100 mg film-coated tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each film-coated tablet contains 100 mg of idelalisib. Excipient with known effect Each tablet contains 0.1 mg sunset yellow FCF (E110) (see section 4.4). For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Film-coated tablet. Orange, oval-shaped, film-coated tablet of dimensions 9.7 mm by 6.0 mm, debossed on one side with “GSI” and “100” on the other side. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Zydelig is indicated in combination with rituximab for the treatment of adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): • who have received at least one prior therapy (see section 4.4), or • as first line treatment in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in patients who are not eligible for any other therapies (see section 4.4). Zydelig is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) that is refractory to two prior lines of treatment (see section 4.4). 4.2 Posology and method of administration Treatment with Zydelig should be conducted by a physician experienced in the use of anti-cancer therapies. Posology The recommended dose is 150 mg idelalisib twice daily. Treatment should be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. If the patient misses a dose of Zydelig within 6 hours of the time it is usually taken, the patient should take the missed dose as soon as possible and resume the normal dosing schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Original New Drug Applications
    New Drugs Reviewed by CPG January 23, 2017 (Original New Drug Applications: FDA) Generic Name Trade Name Indication(s) CPG Action Immune globulin Cuvitru Biologic and In accordance with subcutaneous Immunological the SCA [human] 20% solution Agents/Immune Globulins/ Immune Globulin (Human) subcutaneous. Indicated as replacement for primary humoral immunodeficiency in adult and pediatric patients age two and older. eteplirsen Exondys 51 Central Nervous System In accordance with Agents/Antisense the SCA Oligonucleotides. Treatment of patients who have a confirmed mutation of the dystrophin gene amenable to exon 51 skipping. First drug approved for reatment of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. levonorgestrel- Kyleena Endocrine and May prescribe releasing intrauterine Metabolic Agents/sex system 19.5 mg homones/contraceptive Hormones. Prevention of pregnancy for up to five years. **Phentermine Lomaira Central Nervous System In accordance with hydrochloride 8 mg Agents/ the SCA anorexiants/sympathomi metic anorexiants. Short term use weight reduction in adults with **(new formulation at an initial BMI of 30 or lower dosage) more or 27 with at least one weight-related condition. 1 New Drugs January 2017 canaglifozin/ Invokamet XR Endocrine and May prescribe metformin HCL Metabolic Agents/ extended-release antidiabetic agents/antidiabetic combination products. Treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes as an adjunct to diet and exercise. Adalimumab-atto Amjevita Biologic and In accordance with Immunological Agents/ the SCA Immunologic Agents/Immunomodulat ors/Tumor necrosis Factor-Alpha Blockers. Indicated for treatment of adults with: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis,ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, and plaque psoriasis. Also indicated for juvenile idiopathic arthritis in pts age 4 years and older.
    [Show full text]
  • ZYDELIG Safely and Effectively
    FL and SLL are approved under accelerated approval based on overall HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION response rate. Improvement in patient survival or disease related These highlights do not include all the information needed to use symptoms has not been established. Continued approval for these ZYDELIG safely and effectively. See full prescribing information indications may be contingent upon verification of clinical benefit for ZYDELIG. in confirmatory trials. ZYDELIG® (idelalisib) tablets, for oral use ------------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION----------------------- Initial U.S. Approval: 2014 Recommended dosage: 150 mg orally twice daily. (2.1) WARNING: FATAL AND SERIOUS TOXICITIES: HEPATIC, ----------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS--------------------- SEVERE DIARRHEA, COLITIS, PNEUMONITIS, INFECTIONS, Tablets: 100 mg, 150 mg. (3) and INTESTINAL PERFORATION See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. -------------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS------------------------------- History of serious hypersensitivity reactions to idelalisib, including • Fatal and/or serious hepatotoxicity occurred in 16% to 18% anaphylaxis, or history of toxic epidermal necrolysis with any drug. (4) of Zydelig-treated patients. Monitor hepatic function prior to and during treatment. Interrupt and then reduce or ------------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS----------------------- discontinue Zydelig. (5.1) • Severe Cutaneous Reactions: Monitor patients for the development • Fatal and/or serious and severe diarrhea
    [Show full text]
  • Idelalisib Promotes Bim-Dependent Apoptosis Through AKT/Foxo3a in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Dan Yue1 and Xun Sun2
    Yue and Sun Cell Death and Disease (2018) 9:935 DOI 10.1038/s41419-018-0960-8 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access Idelalisib promotes Bim-dependent apoptosis through AKT/FoxO3a in hepatocellular carcinoma Dan Yue1 and Xun Sun2 Abstract Idelalisib, a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma treatment and for follicular lymphoma treatment when combined with rituximab. However, the mechanisms of effective action of idelalisib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. In the current study, we aimed to investigate how idelalisib inhibits the growth of HCC cells and enhances the effects of other chemotherapeutic drugs. Our results show that idelalisib treatment promotes Bim induction in HCC via the FoxO3a pathway following PI3K/AKT inactivation. Moreover, our results show that Bim is required for idelalisib-mediated apoptosis in HCC. Idelalisib also synergizes with sorafenib or doxorubicin to induce significant apoptosis in HCC, and Bim is also necessary for the induction of apoptosis by cotreatment. Furthermore, a xenograft experiment reveals that the Bim deficiency abolishes apoptosis and antitumor effects of idelalisib in vivo. In summary, our results indicate a key role of Bim in mediating the antitumor effects of idelalisib in HCC. Our results also support the clinical significance of the drug. 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; Introduction cytosolic tyrosine kinase participating in various signaling Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the pathways in B-cells6,7. Idelalisib is approved by FDA as second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, monotherapy, or in combination with rituximab (Rituxan, especially in developing countries1,2. The incidence of for the treatment of small lymphocytic lymphoma, HCC in developed countries is on the rise due to recurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and folli- the progress of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in the cular lymphoma8.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Malignant Disease and Immunosuppression
    1 8. Malignant disease and immunosuppression An ever increasing number of cytotoxic drugs and biological therapies - now referred to as Systemic anti- cancer therapy (SACT) - are used in the management of malignant disease. The recommended doses and schedules vary according to the tumour type and regimen. Details on the different regimens for differing tumour types are available via the SCAN (South East Scotland Cancer Network) website http://www.scan.scot.nhs.uk/Pages/default.aspx. SACT should always be prescribed under the supervision of a cancer specialist. With the exception of hormonal treatments, the whole course of oral SACT for the treatment of cancer is most commonly dispensed by the hospital pharmacy. The prescription should not be repeated except on the explicit instruction of a specialist. Non-malignant disease Cytotoxic drugs are also used for their immunosuppressive or anti–proliferative effects in the treatment of auto–immune conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, prevention of transplant rejection and in vasculitis. All staff in any care setting must be aware of the risks of handling these drugs and the precautions that need to be taken to safeguard themselves and others. For further information refer to COSHH regulation 2002 www.hse.gov.uk/coshh/ and CEL 30 (2012) www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/mels/CEL2012_30.pdf. Most of the SACT drugs listed below are for specialist use only and are not suitable for general use in primary care. They are listed here for information only. The only SACT drugs that may be prescribed on occasion by GPs are cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine and hydroxycarbamide after initiation or recommendation of a specialist.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021
    FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021 FDA EPC Text Phrase PLR regulations require that the following statement is included in the Highlights Indications and Usage heading if a drug is a member of an EPC [see 21 CFR 201.57(a)(6)]: “(Drug) is a (FDA EPC Text Phrase) indicated for Active Moiety Name [indication(s)].” For each listed active moiety, the associated FDA EPC text phrase is included in this document. For more information about how FDA determines the EPC Text Phrase, see the 2009 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" guidance and 2013 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" MAPP 7400.13.
    [Show full text]
  • Zydelig-H-C-003843-Ii-0011-Epar-Assessment-Report-Variation En.Pdf
    21 July 2016 EMA/CHMP/657576/2016 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Zydelig International non-proprietary name: idelalisib Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/003843/II/0011 Note Variation assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2016. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 5 1.1. Type II variation .................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product ......................................................... 5 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 6 2.1. Introduction......................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Non-clinical aspects .............................................................................................. 7 2.2.1. Ecotoxicity/environmental risk assessment ........................................................... 7 2.2.2. Discussion on non-clinical aspects.......................................................................
    [Show full text]