(Tillyard): a (Anisoptera: Aeshnidae) Recently, Antipodophlebia Originally
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
First Records of Dragonflies (Odonata) from the Foja Mountains, Papua Province, Indonesia
14 Suara Serangga Papua, 2009, 4 (1) Juli- September 2009 First records of dragonflies (Odonata) from the Foja Mountains, Papua Province, Indonesia 1 2 Vincent J. Kalkman , Henk van Mastrigt & Stephen J. Rlchards" 1Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum - Naturalis Postbus 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, THE NETHERLANDS Email: [email protected] 2 Kelompok Entomologi Papua, Kotakpos 1078, Jayapura 99010, Papua, INDONESIA Email: [email protected] 3 Vertebrates Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, AUSTRALlA and Rapid Assessment Program, Conservation International, Atherton, Queensland 4883, AUSTRALlA Email: [email protected] Suara Serangga Papua: 4 (1): 14 - 19 Abstract: A small collection of dragonflies obtained during two RAP biodiversity surveys to the Foja Mountains, organised by Conservation International with help of LlPI, Bogor, in 2005 and 2008 are brought on record. Twelve species were found at two sites below 100 m near Kwerba, a small village adjacent to the Mamberamo River. Thirteen species were recorded at 'Moss Camp' at 1650 m in the Foja Mountains. Of these Hemicordulia ericetorum was previously only known from the central mountain range while Oreaeschna dictatrix was only known from Lake Paniai and the Cyclops Mountains. It is likely that more genera and species now known onlyfrom the central mountain range occur in the Foja Mountains and probably also the Van Rees Mountains. However one species, Argiolestes spec. nov. is probably endemie to the Foja Mountains. Although this collection includes only a small fraction of the diversity likely to be present in the mountains it is nonetheless of interest as it represents the first records of dragonflies from the area. -
The Phylogeny of the Zygopterous Dragonflies As Based on The
THE PHYLOGENY OF THE ZYGOPTEROUS DRAGON- FLIES AS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE PENES* CLARENCE HAMILTON KENNEDY, Ohio State University. This paper is merely the briefest outline of the writer's discoveries with regard to the inter-relationship of the major groups of the Zygoptera, a full account of which will appear in his thesis on the subject. Three papers1 by the writer discussing the value of this organ in classification of the Odonata have already been published. At the beginning, this study of the Zygoptera was viewed as an undertaking to define the various genera more exactly. The writer in no wise questioned the validity of the Selysian concep- tion that placed the Zygopterous subfamilies in series with the richly veined '' Calopterygines'' as primitive and the Pro- toneurinae as the latest and final reduction of venation. However, following Munz2 for the Agrioninae the writer was able to pick out here and there series of genera where the devel- opment was undoubtedly from a thinly veined wing to one richly veined, i. e., Megalagrion of Hawaii, the Argia series, Leptagrion, etc. These discoveries broke down the prejudice in the writer's mind for the irreversibility of evolution in the reduction of venation in the Odonata orders as a whole. Undoubt- ably in the Zygoptera many instances occur where a richly veined wing is merely the response to the necessity of greater wing area to support a larger body. As the study progressed the writer found almost invariably that generalized or connecting forms were usually sparsely veined as compared to their relatives. -
Etymology of the Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) Named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online Etymology of the Dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. IAN D. ENDERSBY 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Vic 3094 ([email protected]) Published on 23 April 2012 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN Endersby, I.D. (2012). Etymology of the dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 134, 1-16. R.J. Tillyard described 26 genera and 130 specifi c or subspecifi c taxa of dragonfl ies from the Australasian region. The etymology of the scientifi c name of each of these is given or deduced. Manuscript received 11 December 2011, accepted for publication 16 April 2012. KEYWORDS: Australasia, Dragonfl ies, Etymology, Odonata, Tillyard. INTRODUCTION moved to another genus while 16 (12%) have fallen into junior synonymy. Twelve (9%) of his subspecies Given a few taxonomic and distributional have been raised to full species status and two species uncertainties, the odonate fauna of Australia comprises have been relegated to subspecifi c status. Of the 325 species in 113 genera (Theischinger and Endersby eleven subspecies, or varieties or races as Tillyard 2009). The discovery and naming of these dragonfl ies sometimes called them, not accounted for above, fi ve falls roughly into three discrete time periods (Table 1). are still recognised, albeit four in different genera, During the fi rst of these, all Australian Odonata were two are no longer considered as distinct subspecies, referred to European experts, while the second era and four have disappeared from the modern literature. -
Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae: Brachytroninae)
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 0028_1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Theischinger Günther Artikel/Article: The species of Austrophlebia TILLYARD (Odonata: Anisoptra: Aeshnidae: Brachytroninae). 305-314 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 28/1 305-314 20.8.1996 The species of Austrophlebia TlLLYARD (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae: Brachytroninae) G. THEISCHINGER Abstract: Larvae and adults of Austrophlebia TILL YARD are analysed, resulting in the description of a second species. Key words: Austrophlebia, revision, Australia. Introduction During recent studies towards a key to the last instar larvae and exuviae of the Australian dragonflies, the larvae of Austrophlebia TlLLYARD, supposedly a mono- typic genus, were found to be heterogeneous. Differences exist particularly in the shape of the prementum, generally the most use- ful character for identifying closely allied species in many aeshnid genera, most notably in Austroaeschna SELYS, the genus considered closest to Austrophlebia. Whereas marked differences were found between populations from south of latitude 21°S and populations from north of latitude 18°S, no major morphological differences were detected between single populations from inside the two regions. Further study, involving also adults of Austrophlebia, finally revealed that the two morphologically distinct groups of larvae also produce two types of adults. The dif- ferences between the two groups of populations of Austrophlebia in colouration of adults and in adult and larval morphology are of a magnitude which indicates distinctness at species level. A second species of Austrophlebia is, therefore, described below and compared with A. -
Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Australian the to Guide Identification
Identification Guide to theAustralian Odonata www.environment.nsw.gov.au Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data Theischinger, G. (Gunther), 1940– Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata 1. Odonata – Australia. 2. Odonata – Australia – Identification. I. Endersby I. (Ian), 1941- . II. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW © 2009 Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Front cover: Petalura gigantea, male (photo R. Tuft) Prepared by: Gunther Theischinger, Waters and Catchments Science, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW and Ian Endersby, 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Victoria 3094 Published by: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131555 (information & publication requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. ISBN 978 1 74232 475 3 DECCW 2009/730 December 2009 Printed using environmentally sustainable paper. Contents About this guide iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Systematics -
Critical Species of Odonata in Australia
---Guardians of the watershed. Global status of Odonata: critical species, threat and conservation --- Critical species of Odonata in Australia John H. Hawking 1 & Gunther Theischinger 2 1 Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, PO Box 921, Albury NSW, Australia 2640. <[email protected]> 2 Environment Protection Authority, New South Wales, 480 Weeroona Rd, Lidcombe NSW, Australia 2141. <[email protected]> Key words: Odonata, dragonfly, IUCN, critical species, conservation, Australia. ABSTRACT The Australian Odonata fauna is reviewed. The state of the current taxonomy and ecology, studies on biodiversity, studies on larvae and the all identification keys are reported. The conservation status of the Australian odonates is evaluated and the endangered species identified. In addition the endemic species, species with unusual biology and species, not threatened yet, but maybe becoming critical in the future are discussed and listed. INTRODUCTION Australia has a diverse odonate fauna with many relict (most endemic) and most of the modern families (Watson et al. 1991). The Australian fauna is now largely described, but the lack of organised surveys resulted in limited distributional and ecological information. The conservation of Australian Odonata also received scant attention, except for Watson et al. (1991) promoting the awareness of Australia's large endemic fauna, the listing of four species as endangered (Moore 1997; IUCN 2003) and the suggesting of categories for all Australian species (Hawking 1999). This conservation report summarizes the odonate studies/ literature for species found in Continental Australia (including nearby smaller and larger islands) plus Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island. Australia encompasses tropical, temperate, arid, alpine and off shore island climatic regions, with the land mass situated between latitudes 11-44 os and 113-154 °E, and flanked on the west by the Indian Ocean and on the east by the Pacific Ocean. -
Argiolestes1 (Odonata: Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae)
© Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Stapfia 55 613-621 11. September 1998 Supra-specific diversity in Australian "Argiolestes1 (Odonata: Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae) Günther THEISCMNGER Abstract: What was hitherto referred to as Argiolestes SELYS from Australia is divided into three genera. They are Archiargiolestes KENNEDY, formerly considered as a junior synonym of Argiolestes SELYS, and Griseargiolestes and Miniargiolestes, both described as new. Revised dia- gnoses including adult and larval characters are presented for those genera and for Austroargiolestes KENNEDY. A key is given to the final instar larvae of the megapodagrionid genera known from Australia. Key words: Megapodagrionidae, new genera, Australia. Introduction According to WATSON et al. (1991) the Australian species currently placed in Argiolestes are not closely allied to their exotic congeners and the south-western species differ in some re- spects from those in eastern Australia. Subsequent and more detailed study of the adults, particularly of the wing venation and the male secondary genitalia, of Australian "Argiolestes", however, revealed that it includes three very distinct groups, none of which is Argiolestes [type species A. australis (GUERIN); see LIEFTINCK (1956)]. This notion was confirmed by even more recent work on the larvae of the Australian Megapodagrionidae. As taxonomic consequence the division of Australian "Argiolestes" into three genera appears appropriate. It includes the resurrection of Archiargiolestes KENNEDY and the introduction of two new genera. Archiargiolestes KENNEDY had been established already by KENNEDY (1925). He based it on A. pusillissimus KENNEDY and also included A. pusillus (TILLYARD) and A. griseus (HAGEN in SELYS). WATSON (1977) called the Western Australian members of this group Argiolestes pusillus complex without discussing its generic placement. -
Madygen, Triassic Lagerstätte Number One, Before and After Sharov
ALAVESIA, 2: 113-124 (2008) ISSN 1887-7419 Madygen, Triassic Lagerstätte number one, before and after Sharov Dmitry E. SHCHERBAKOV Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117647, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The insect fauna of the world’s richest Triassic fossil locality, Madygen (Ladinian–Carnian of Kyrgyzstan) is reviewed; other groups of animals and plants recorded from the locality are also listed. The research history, fossil preservation and paleoenvironment of the Madygen Formation are briefly discussed. The site was discovered in 1933, and the better part of fossils was collected from the outcrop richest in insects, Dzhayloucho, during five expeditions headed by Alexander Sharov, who discovered there and described two peculiar gliding reptiles that made Madygen worldwide known. The entomofauna includes 20 orders (including the earliest Hymenoptera and early Diptera) and nearly 100 families. The insect assemblage is numerically dominated by Coleoptera, Blattodea, and Auchenorrhyncha. In Dzhayloucho, subdo- minants are Mecoptera, Orthoptera, and Protorthoptera. The largest insects belong to Titanoptera, the order established by Sharov and the most diverse in Madygen. Amphibiotic insects are rare and represented almost exclusively by adults. In some outcrops phyllopod Kazacharthra are common. The paleoenvironment may be reconstructed as an intermontane river valley in seasonally arid climate, with mineralized oxbow lakes and ephemeral ponds on the floodplain. KEY WORDS: Middle–Late Triassic. Insects. Composition of entomofauna. Paleoenvironment. INTRODUCTION 1966; cited after Dobruskina 1995). According to her ideas The world renown fossil site near the village of Mady- the Madygen Formation contains both Permian and Trias- gen, in foothills of the Turkestan Range (south of Fergana sic strata (cropping out in different areas), and the Permian Valley), Kyrgyzstan has yielded more than twenty thousand Madygen flora was rich in Mesozoic elements. -
Taxonomy, Biology and Conservation Taxonomy
Adv. Odonatol. 1: 293-302 December 31, 1982 Dragonflies in the Australian environment: taxonomy, biology and conservation J.A.L. Watson Division of Entomology, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia Australian fauna includes The dragonfly slightly more than 100 of and almost 200 of there endemic species Zygoptera Anisoptera; are two families and and of endemism at and one subfamily, a high degree generic specific levels. Gondwana elements make up at least 15% and perhaps as much as 40% of the fauna, whereas 40% are of northern origin, with a lower of endemism. of the southern breed in degree Most species perman- the in the ent flowing water, mainly along eastern seaboard, with some north, north-west and south-west. The northern dragonflies penetrate southern Australia variable the to a degree, principally along east coast. Adult the dragonflies occur throughout arid inland; most are opportun- istic None has wanderers. a drought-resistant larva, although drought- -resistant and terrestrial larvae occur elsewhere in Australia. The conser- vation of Australia Odonata involves problems arising from habitat des- truction or the alienation of fresh waters for human consumption or agri- culture. Pollution does not threaten any Australian species of dragonfly, it adults larvae although may affect local dragonfly faunas; and of appro- priately chosen species can serve to monitor water quality. INTRODUCTION The taxonomy of the Australian dragonflies is well established. Fabricius described the first known species, from material that Banks and Solander collected during their enforced stay at the Endeavour Australian River in 1770, during Cook’s voyage along the eastern coast. -
Freshwater Biotas of New Guinea and Nearby Islands: Analysis of Endemism, Richness, and Threats
FRESHWATER BIOTAS OF NEW GUINEA AND NEARBY ISLANDS: ANALYSIS OF ENDEMISM, RICHNESS, AND THREATS Dan A. Polhemus, Ronald A. Englund, Gerald R. Allen Final Report Prepared For Conservation International, Washington, D.C. November 2004 Contribution No. 2004-004 to the Pacific Biological Survey Cover pictures, from lower left corner to upper left: 1) Teinobasis rufithorax, male, from Tubetube Island 2) Woa River, Rossel Island, Louisiade Archipelago 3) New Lentipes species, male, from Goodenough Island, D’Entrecasteaux Islands This report was funded by the grant “Freshwater Biotas of the Melanesian Region” from Conservation International, Washington, DC to the Bishop Museum with matching support from the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC FRESHWATER BIOTAS OF NEW GUINEA AND NEARBY ISLANDS: ANALYSIS OF ENDEMISM, RICHNESS, AND THREATS Prepared by: Dan A. Polhemus Dept. of Entomology, MRC 105 Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560, USA Ronald A. Englund Pacific Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817, USA Gerald R. Allen 1 Dreyer Road, Roleystone W. Australia 6111, Australia Final Report Prepared for: Conservation International Washington, D.C. Bishop Museum Technical Report 31 November 2004 Contribution No. 2004–004 to the Pacific Biological Survey Published by BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright © 2004 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Freshwater Biotas of New Guinea and -
Focusing on the Landscape a Report for Caring for Our Country
Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System Part A: Fauna A Report for Caring for Our Country Prepared by Industry and Investment, New South Wales Forest Science Centre, Forest & Rangeland Ecosystems. PO Box 100, Beecroft NSW 2119 Australia. 1 Table of Contents Figures.......................................................................................................................................2 Tables........................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................5 Introduction...............................................................................................................................8 Methods.....................................................................................................................................9 Results and Discussion ...........................................................................................................14 References.............................................................................................................................194 Appendix 1 Vertebrate summary .........................................................................................196 Appendix 2 Invertebrate summary.......................................................................................197 Figures Figure 1. Location of protected areas -
Australian Dragonfly (Odonata) Larvae: Descriptive History and Identification
Memoirs of Museum Victoria 72: 73–120 (2014) Published XX-XX-2014 ISSN 1447-2546 (Print) 1447-2554 (On-line) http://museumvictoria.com.au/about/books-and-journals/journals/memoirs-of-museum-victoria/ Australian Dragonfly (Odonata) Larvae: Descriptive history and identification G. THEISCHINGER1 AND I. ENDERSBY2 1 NSW Department of Planning and Environment, Office of Environment and Heritage, PO Box 29, Lidcombe NSW 1825 Australia; [email protected] 2 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Vic. 3094 Abstract Theischinger, G. and Endersby, I. 2014. Australian Dragonfly (Odonata) Larvae: Descriptive history and identification. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria XX: 73-120. To improve the reliability of identification for Australian larval Odonata, morphological and geographic information is summarised for all species. All known references that contain information on characters useful for identification of larvae are presented in an annotated checklist. For polytypic genera information is provided to clarify whether each species can already, or cannot yet, be distinguished on morphological characters, and whether and under which conditions geographic locality is sufficient to make a diagnosis. For each species the year of original description and of first description of the larva, level of confidence in current identifications, and supportive information, are included in tabular form. Habitus illustrations of generally final instar larvae or exuviae for more than 70% of the Australian dragonfly genera are presented. Keywords Odonata, Australia, larvae, descriptive history, identification Introduction literature on dragonfly larvae ranges from brief descriptions or line drawings of single structures in single species to The size, colour, tremendous flight abilities and unusual comprehensive revisions (including colour photos and keys) of reproductive behaviours of dragonflies make them one of the large taxonomic groups.