FAA National Runway Safety Plan 2018-2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FAA National Runway Safety Plan 2018-2020 COMMITTED TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING SURFACE SAFETY. National Runway Safety Plan 2018-2020 NRSP RUNWAY SAFETY COUNCIL #47 www.faa.gov Executive-Level Statement Before rolling for takeoff, all pilots TABLE make sure their compass aligns with OF CONTENTS Summary the known direction of the runway. 4 This critical step reduces risk by Safety Assurance helping ensure flight instruments 6 are calibrated properly. Safety Risk Management Like a compass, the National Runway Safety Plan 8 2018-2020 aligns our strategic priorities with established Safety Risk Management principles. The plan defines how the FAA, airports, and industry Safety Policy partners collaborate and use data-driven, risk-based 10 decision-making to enhance the safety of the National Airspace System. Safety Promotion This is especially important in an era of tightening 16 resources. We are doing more with less by refining data and using automation to improve efficiency. We prefer modifying present resources to introducing new 19 International Leadership technology as a way to enhance safety mitigations. Our efforts are local, national, and international in scope. We can pinpoint problems at an airport to a single intersection at a specific time of day, or use millions of data points to identify a systemic problem. Our Runway Safety Enhancement Initiatives apply strategic efforts to mitigate the identified risk. The Runway Safety Program’s responsibility continues to serve as the focal point for all surface safety initiatives. We are committed to continuously improving runway safety. James Fee Safety and Technical Training Runway Safety Group Manager Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Organization 4 2018-2020 National Runway Safety Plan Strategic Objectives 2018-2020 National Runway Safety Plan Strategic Objectives 5 Summary SAFETY ASSURANCE Identify Operating Hazards The National Runway Safety Plan 2018-2020 Council, that have been used in several cases Program Data builds on the achievements of the National to identify and mitigate safety risks. We identify Runway Safety Plan 2015-2017. The most and discuss three strategic steps. These steps Remain the global leader Voluntary Safety Reporting fundamental impact of the first plan has include data collection and analysis, plans and in assuring runway safety Investigations been the successful integration of the Safety policy, and finally communicating the change. enhancement initiatives are Safety Risk Monitoring Management System principles into the Runway effective in maintaining an Data Analysis Safety strategy. These principles are: Safety As with the previous plan, this plan is designed acceptable level of safety at U.S. Assurance, Safety Risk Management, Safety to expand our role as the global leader in runway Partnership for Safety airports with an air traffic control Policy, and Safety Promotion. safety while serving as a resource for anyone tower. Audits and Evaluations interested in aviation safety. For each principle, These principles favor iterative steps in support we describe the current state of applications of data-driven, risk-based decision-making. of the principle and how they fit into the overall That’s a strategy we will apply during the three strategy. Supplemental documents can be found SAFETY RISK years of this plan. on the RUNWAY SAFETY WEBSITE. MANAGEMENT Analyze, Assess, Mitigate, and Accept Risk An important example of how that strategy benefits the NAS has been the identification of Implement Runway Safety Develop Monitoring Plan wrong surface operations as a rising risk and The four components of the SMS Enhancement Initiatives that Safety Risk Management our subsequent focus on finding solutions to manage or reduce the risk of Documents mitigate the risk. One of these solutions, Airport combine to create a systemic airport operations. Surface Detection Equipment Model X (ASDE-X) Taxiway Arrival Prediction (ATAP) is in use today. approach to managing and We refer to this example throughout the plan to SAFETY ensuring safety. illustrate how the Runway Safety strategy works. POLICY This plan outlines the methods and collaborative SMS Orders organizations, such as the Runway Safety Establish and maintain policies Safety Guidance and procedures to ensure adequate resources are available FAA/ATO Safety Orders to accomplish the FAA’s near-term SMS Manual and strategic objectives. SAFETY PROMOTION Outreach and Education Relentlessly promote best Products practices, lessons learned, and Lessons Learned actionable information obtained Workshops from data analysis to our global Safety Communication runway safety stakeholders. 6 2018-2020 National Runway Safety Plan Strategic Objectives 2018-2020 National Runway Safety Plan Strategic Objectives 7 MILESTONES After conducting data Integrate the capability for analysis on wrong surface the automatic-classification 1. Safety Assurance events, the Runway Safety (Autoclass) of surface safety Group identified 9 airports events. The RSG will use across the country with technology to isolate low-risk DATA MONITORING AND ANALYSIS high risk of runway excursions non-conflict category D and collisions. During FY20, the events and high confidence RSG conducted Special Focus conflict category C events. RSAT meetings at the identified This will streamline resources airports to discuss mitigation by reducing the number of Objective: Remain the global leader in assuring Runway Safety strategies and to develop a events that are currently plan of action. Most of these manually entered and enhancement initiatives are effective in maintaining an acceptable meetings were conducted processed in runway safety level of safety at U.S. airports with an air traffic control tower. virtually due to COVID-19 tool. This milestone requires pandemic travel restrictions. See close coordination with By weighting some categories of data collected Absolute safety is elusive, but approachable. the Safety Promotion section for FAA Enterprise Information involving runway excursions, incursions, and surface We plan to get closer every year. The first step more information and a list of Management and will carry incidents, the Surface Safety Metric sorts information in our strategic approach to safety is to collect the SFRSAT airports. over from FY20 to FY21. and analyze data generated by aviation activity for a better understanding of what is driving the most in the National Airspace System (NAS). risk in the system. The weighting is based on severity Currently, we use data collected from runway Absolute safety is incursions (RI) and surface incidents to sort Safety Assurance: Combined Risk and Event Count runway incursions into categories established by elusive, but approachable. the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as A, B, C, and D events. A and B are considered and frequency to create a combined risk index. The 3500 140 severe and attract the most attention. However, data showed that because we see and mitigate more the four categories present a significant limitation; incidents, cumulative risk decreases. 3000 120 they do not adequately measure the risk to people and property in the NAS. For example, C and D CLICK HERE TO SEE THE SURFACE SAFETY METRIC 2500 100 events may at times indicate greater risk. WEIGHTING SCHEME DOCUMENT. 2000 80 In response to this limitation, the Surface Beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, the Surface Safety Metric was created to measure safety Safety Metric will be the FAA’s main metric for the 1500 60 performance of the NAS in the runway public reporting of risk in the NAS. It builds on the categories established by ICAO but allows the FAA, environment. Unlike existing metrics that focus 1000 40 primarily on RIs, the Surface Safety Metric through its Safety Management System (SMS), Weight Combined incorporates all types of relevant runway safety to sort data differently and focus on events with 500 20 events that occur in the runway environment. outcomes such as injury and/or aircraft damage, according to their proximity to a fatal accident. By Count Accidentsof and Incidents 0 0 This technique helped us discover the risks posed incorporating every type of runway safety event, the by a growing number of aircraft taking off, landing, Surface Safety Metric reflects the overall safety of ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 or taxiing on the wrong surface. Our reaction to the NAS in the runway environment. With the use that discovery will be discussed further in the of this comprehensive metric, the FAA is setting an Combined Accident Count Combined Weight Safety Risk Management, Safety Policy, and innovative example that can be shared internationally Safety Promotions sections below. to increase runway safety worldwide. Combined Incident Count Poly. (Combined Weight [MA]) 8 2018-20202018-2020 National Runway Safety Plan Strategic Objectives 2018-2020 National Runway Safety Plan Strategic Objectives 9 MILESTONES 2. Safety Risk The Runway Safety Group’s objective is to take steps to continuously achieve all initiatives established within the 2020 time frame and beyond. In the spirit of continuing forward, all initiatives 2020 are documented for accountability in the SURFACE SAFETY GROUP (SSG) INITIATIVE TRACKING DOCUMENT. Management MITIGATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT Objective: Remain the global leader in implementing ASDE-X Taxiway Arrival Pre-ATAP mitigation plans and technology that manage or reduce Prediction (ATAP) Enhancement 500ft Threshold the risk of airport operations. ATAP is an enhancement
Recommended publications
  • Runway Safety Spring 2021 Report
    Graphical NOTAM Interface For Improving Efficiency of Reporting NOTAM Information April 2021 Design Challenge: Runway Safety/Runway Incursions/Runway Excursions Challenge E: Optimizing application of NextGen technology to improve runway safety in particular and airport safety in general. Team Members: Undergraduate Students: Matthew Bacon, Gregory Porcaro, Andrew Vega Advisor’s Name: Dr. Audra Morse Michigan Technological University Table of Contents | 1 02 Executive Summary Runway excursions are a type of aviation incident where an aircraft makes an unsafe exit from the runway. According to the Ascend World Aircraft Accident Summary (WAAS), 141 runway excursion accidents involving the Western-built commercial aircraft fleet occurred globally from 1998 to 2007, resulting in 550 fatalities; 74% of landing phase excursions were caused by either weather-related factors or decision-making factors (Ascend, 2007). One mitigation strategy is training pilots how to interpret Runway Condition Codes (RWYCCs) to understand runway conditions. Recent developments such as NextGen and Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) have improved the quality of weather condition reporting. However, Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs), the primary source of runway condition information and any other irregularities in airspace, are still presented to pilots in an inefficient format contributing to runway excursions and safety concerns NOTAMs consist of confusing abbreviations and do not effectively convey the relative importance of information. The team developed an Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) user interface that provides a graphical representation of NOTAM and weather information to improve how pilots receive condition changes at airports. The graphical NOTAM interface utilizes Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) to receive real time NOTAM updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly — 40Th Session
    A40-WP/160 International Civil Aviation Organization P/5 1/8/19 INFORMATION PAPER (Information paper) English only Revision No. 1 23/8/19 ASSEMBLY — 40TH SESSION PLENARY Agenda Item 5: Election of Member States to be represented on the Council CANDIDATURE OF THE STATE OF QATAR (Presented by the State of Qatar) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper presents information about the contributions of the State of Qatar to the global civil aviation communities with respect to the unlimited support of building a safe, secure and sustainable air transport system world-wide; while ensuring adequate infrastructure, equipment and training are maintained to develop the ever-changing civil aviation industry. Qatar believes that it is well qualified to contribute as a Member State to the Council’s work in the challenging years ahead. Strategic This information paper relates to all the Strategic Objectives. Objectives: Financial No additional resources required. implications: References: Doc 7600, Standing Rules of Procedure of the Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organization 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Air transport is one of the key drivers of global economic growth. In fact, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates that there will be over 6.5 billion passengers and the aviation industry will support 103 million jobs and produce $5.8 trillion in economic activity by 2032. The Air transport industry is one of the primary components of global connectivity. It is a significant enabler of economic prosperity. 1.2 According to the World Economic Forum 2018, Qatar is ranked the second most competitive economy in the Arab region based on their Global Competitiveness Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Suzanne Pinkerton
    University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 9-1-1978 Aviation Suzanne Pinkerton Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr Recommended Citation Suzanne Pinkerton, Aviation, 10 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 530 (1978) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol10/iss2/11 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Inter- American Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAWYER OF THE AMERICAS AVIATION REPORT SUZANNE C. PINKERTON* United Nations In September 1977, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) held its Twenty-second Assembly. Among the resolutions adopted was Resolution A 22-16,1 in which the Assembly requested those member states which had not previously done so, to become parties to the Conven- tion for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (Hague, 1970)2 and the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation (Montreal, 1971).1 On November 3, 1977, the United Nations General Assembly, in response to the concern voiced by the ICAO, adopted by consensus Resolution 32/84 on the safety of international civil aviation. In adopting the resolution the General Assembly reaffirmed its condemna- tion of aerial hijacking and other interference with civil air travel. Two days earlier the Special Political Commitee had approved, by consensus, the resolution in draft form? In its final form, Resolution 32/8 is divided into five paragraphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Methods & Tools for Airline Flight Safety Analysis, Issue 2
    PAGE LEFT BLANK Guide to METHODS & TOOLS FOR AIRLINE FLIGHT SAFETY ANALYSIS Prepared by: GAIN Working Group B, Analytical Methods and Tools Second Edition – June 2003 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK GAIN Guide to Methods & Tools for Airline Flight Safety Analysis Table of Contents Page Foreword...................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................vi 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Guide .........................................................................................................1 1.2 GAIN Overview ..........................................................................................................1 1.3 Working Group B: Analytical Methods and Tools .....................................................1 1.4 Scope ...........................................................................................................................2 1.5 Definitions ...................................................................................................................2 1.6 Review of Methods and Tools.....................................................................................2 1.7 Organization of this Guide ..........................................................................................3 1.8 Changes
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Airports
    Electric Airports In the next few years, it is highly likely that the global aircraft fleet will undergo a transformative change, changing air travel for everyone. This is a result of advances in battery technology, which are making the viability of electric aircraft attractive to industry leaders and startups. The reasons for switching from a fossil­fueled to electric powertrain are not simply environmental, though aircraft do currently contribute around 3% of global carbon dioxide emissions [1]. Electric aircraft will provide convenient, comfortable, cheap and fast transportation for all. This promise provides a powerful incentive for large companies such as Airbus and many small startups to work on producing compelling electric aircraft. There are a number of fundamental characteristics that make electric aircraft appealing. The most intuitive is that they are predicted to produce very little noise, as the propulsion system does not rely on violent combustion [2]. This makes flying much quieter for both passengers and people around airports. As they do not need oxygen for burning jet fuel, they can fly much higher, which in turn will make them faster than today’s aircraft as air resistance decreases with altitude [3]. The most exciting characteristic is that electric aircraft could make vertical take­off and landing, or VTOL, flight a possibility for everyone. Aircraft currently take off using a long runway strip, gaining speed until there is enough airflow over the wings to fly. It obviously doesn’t have to be this way, as helicopters have clearly demonstrated. You can just take off vertically. Though helicopters are far too expensive and slow for us to use them as airliners.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
    Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. the AIRLINE PILOTS LOOK at RUNWAY GROOVING by Carl F
    10. THE AIRLINE PILOTS LOOK AT RUNWAY GROOVING By Carl F. Eck Air Line Pilots Association, International SUMMARY The airline pilots have now had the opportunity to use grooved runways operation- ally for over a year. They have found significant benefits from this development and desire its universal application at all airports. Because of variable operating conditions and the fact that grooving only allows a wet runway to approach the braking capability of a dry runway, they do not believe that any reduction in runway length requirements on wet runways should result from this grooving. INTRODUCTION Every airline pilot has learned from experience that the braking capability that can be reasonably expected on a dry, clean runway surface is not attainable on all dry sur- faces. Even this lesser braking capability deteriorates rapidly when various amounts of water and other contaminants are present. Safety representatives from Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) have searched long and hard for the best way to remove the hazards associated with this condition. Take-off and landing runway distances are all computed on the basis of hard dry runways, and there is for all practical purposes, no extra safety margin available for this braking deterioration in the case of abort at V1 during take-off. (Vi is the speed at which the pilot must decide whether to abort or con- tinue take-off.) Landing distances are also too marginal when all the variable stopping factors involved are considered. DISCUSSION In August 1965, ALPA published in the AIR LINE PILOT an article entitled "The Short Runway" (ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway to Recovery
    Runway to Recovery The United States Framework for Airlines and Airports to Mitigate the Public Health Risks of Coronavirus Guidance Jointly Issued by the U.S. Departments of Transportation, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services Version 1.1 | December 2020 CONTENTS – 03 Overview 07 Principles 09 Air Transportation Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities 11 A Risk-Based Approach for COVID-19 Outbreak Mitigation Planning 14 Public Health Risk Mitigation in the Passenger Air Transportation System 49 Future Areas of Research and Evaluation for Public Health Risk Mitigations 51 Implementation Challenges Specific to International Travel 53 Appendix A: Key Partners and Decision-Makers OVERVIEW A safe, secure, efficient, and resilient air transportation system is essential to our Nation’s physical, economic, and social health. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency has demonstrated that protecting public health in the air transportation system is just as critical as aviation safety and security to the confidence of the flying public. Government, aviation, and public health leaders have been working together—and must continue to do so—to meaningfully reduce the public health risk and restore passenger, aviation workforce (including aircrew), and public confidence in air travel. The U.S. Government continues to assess the evolving situation and the effectiveness of actions and recommendations implemented to date. This updated guidance reflects this continual assessment and updated information. Although there are some updates and adjustments throughout, the key additions and changes in this document include new information on: » Passenger and Aviation Workforce Education » Contact Tracing » Mask Use, specifically the need to accommodate those who cannot wear masks » Passenger Testing This document provides the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functions of an Aviation Safety Regulatory Authority
    Functions of the Regulatory Authority and implementation of ICAO requirements into the state legal system / Civil Aviation Act and CARs 1 1 The functions of an Aviation Safety Regulatory Authority The functions of an Aviation Safety Regulatory Authority should include - Identifying aviation safety risks Developing mitigations which may include a regulatory response and advice and guidance Where a regulatory response is considered appropriate, drafting rules Issuing approvals Monitoring compliance Taking enforcement action3 2 The functions of an Aviation Safety Regulatory Authority Almost every state is a signatory to the Chicago Convention and a member of ICAO. They are committed to implementing ICAO’s Standards and Recommended Practices. And the State and all other Member States of the European Union, are subject to the aviation safety regulations developed by the European Aviation Safety Agency and implemented as part of European law Scope for national rulemaking is heavily constrained 3 The functions of an Aviation Safety Regulatory Authority The NAA, as a national regulator, operates within a framework established by ICAO, the European Union and NAA specific national rules The scope and significance of NAA specific rules is diminishing as the scope of the EASA rules expands The influence of ICAO however remains very important because one of the objectives of EASA is itself to ensure that the rules it develops will be consist with ICAO standards and recommended practices 4 The functions of an Aviation Safety Regulatory Authority You have had or will get presentations on- ICAO European legislation and the national regulatory structure I will summarize these, consider how they affect the activities of a national regulator and look at some key issues for a national regulator 5 Chicago Convention & ICAO European Legislation National Legislation 6 The Chicago Convention .
    [Show full text]
  • National Aviation Safety and Management Plan 2019–2020
    United States Department of Agriculture National Aviation Safety and Management Plan 2019–2020 Forest Service March 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-19-639, Aviation Safety
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters August 2019 AVIATION SAFETY Opportunities Exist for FAA to Improve Airport Terminal Area Safety Efforts GAO-19-639 August 2019 AVIATION SAFETY Opportunities Exist for FAA to Improve Airport Terminal Area Safety Efforts Highlights of GAO-19-639, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found U.S airspace system is one of the safest The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) uses data to analyze some types of in the world, but incidents and near incidents in airport “terminal areas”—runways, taxiways, and ramps. For misses at and around U.S. terminal example, FAA uses data to analyze runway “incursions”—the incorrect presence areas still occur. FAA oversees the of an aircraft, vehicle, or person on the runway. According to FAA data, the rate safety of runways and taxiways and of reported runway incursions nearly doubled from fiscal years 2011 through works with industry partners—including 2018, with most of this increase due to a rise in reports of less severe incursions, airlines, airports, pilots, and others—to or those without immediate safety consequences. However, GAO found that FAA improve safety in these areas. Despite has not identified or removed all duplicates from its data on runway FAA’s continued efforts, the number of “excursions”—when an aircraft veers off or overruns a runway—which limits reported terminal area incidents has FAA’s ability to accurately analyze these incidents. Additionally, FAA does not increased over time. use data to analyze incidents that occur in ramp areas—the parts of terminal GAO was asked to review various areas where aircraft are prepared for departure and arrival—where injuries to issues related to runway safety and to workers and damage to aircraft can occur.
    [Show full text]
  • NOC FALL LISTENING SESSION Metropolitan Airports Commission October 24, 2018 MEETING AGENDA
    NOC FALL LISTENING SESSION Metropolitan Airports Commission October 24, 2018 MEETING AGENDA 7:00 Welcome 7:00 Introductions What is your name? Where do you live? What is your goal for this meeting? 7:10 NOC Update 7:20 2019 NOC Work Plan Ideas 8:00 Closing Feedback What did you like / dislike about the meeting format? NOC UPDATE Community Representatives Industry Representatives Minneapolis Scheduled Airlines Richfield Cargo Carrier Bloomington Charter Operator Eagan Chief Pilot Minnesota Business Aviation Mendota Heights Association At-Large Representative At-Large Representative Apple Valley, Burnsville, Edina, Inver Grove Heights, St. Paul, St. Louis Park and Sunfish Lake • NOC viewed as an industry model in reaching collaborative solutions to aircraft noise impacts NOC UPDATE Provide policy recommendations or options to the MAC Planning, Identify, study and analyze Development and Environment airport noise issues Committee and full Commission regarding airport noise issues Ensure the collection of Monitor compliance with information and dissemination to established noise policy at MSP the public NOC UPDATE – 2018 WORK PLAN • Review Residential Noise Mitigation Program • Evaluate Mendota Heights Airport Relations Implementation Status Commission Runway 12L Departure Proposal • Annual Noise Contour Report and Mitigation • Review and respond to MSP FairSkies requests Eligibility • NOC Bylaw Subcommittee Recommendations • Update on the MSP Long Term Comprehensive • Review and discuss Runway Use System priorities Plan and Associated
    [Show full text]