PUBLISHED by Theconstitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
December 2017 ❏ Volume 3, Number 2 C ONSTITUTIONAL Constitutional Review Thank you very much to ❏ Advisers Relation between the Constitutional Court of the R Prof. Dr. AriefRepublic Hidayat, of Indonesia S.H., M.S. and the Legislators according Dr. Anwarto theUsman, 1945 S.H., Constitution M.H. of the Republic of Indonesia EVIEW Fajar Laksono, Sudarsono, Arief Hidayat, and Muchammad Prof. Dr. MariaAli Farida Safaat Indrati, S.H., M.H. Dr. H. Wahiduddin Adams, S.H., MA. ❏ Prof. Dr. Aswanto The Laws S.H., of M.Si. Ratification DFM. of an International Treaty in Indonesian Laws Hierarchy Dr. I Dewa Gede Palguna, S.H. , M. Hum Noor Sidharta Dr. Suhartoyo, S. H. , M. H. Dr. Manahan❏ M.The P. Sitompul, Indonesian S.H., Constitutional M. Hum Court and the Democratic Institutions in Judicial Review Prof. Dr. Saldi Isra, S.H., MPA. Andy Omara ❏ A Commentary: The Inadmissibility of Non-Indonesian December 2017 Citizens in Judicial Review before the Indonesian Constitutional Court Bayu Mahendra ❏ An Analysis of Subjectum Litis and Objectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court ❏ Anna Triningsih and Nuzul Qur’aini Mardiya Volume 3, Number 2 Volume ❏ The Criticism on the Meaning of “Open Legal Policy” in Verdicts of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court Mardian Wibowo, I Nyoman Nurjaya, Muchammad Ali Safaat, and Jazim Hamidi PUBLISHED BY The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia We Also Publish: “Jurnal Konstitusi” Accredited By LIPI (Indonesian Institute of Sciences) and DIKTI (Indonesian Directorate General of Higher Education) CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONALConstitutional Review COURT, December OF 2017,THE Volume REPUBLIC 3, Number 2 OF INDONESIA December 2017, Volume 3, Number 2 Board of Editors CONTENTS Officially Incharge : M. Guntur Hamzah Relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaEditor-in-Chief and the Legislators: Pan Mohamad according Faiz to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Managing Editors : Wiryanto Fajar Laksono, OlySudarsono, Viana Agustine Arief Hidayat, and Muchammad Ali Safaat Siti Rosmalina Nurhayati The Laws of Ratification of an International Treaty in Indonesian Secretariat : Yossy Adriva Laws Hierarchy Erna Hasanah Noor Sidharta Layout & Cover : Nur Budiman The Indonesian Constitutional Court and the Democratic Institutions in Judicial Review Reviewers Andy Omara Simon Butt A Commentary: The InadmissibilityYuzuru of Non-Indonesian Shimada Citizens in Judicial Review before the IndonesianHayyan Constitutional UI Haq Court Dhiana Puspitawati Bayu Mahendra Henk Kummeling An Analysis of Subjectum Litis Byunand Hae-CheolObjectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court Anna TriningsihAddress and Nuzul Qur’aini Mardiya Constitutional Review The Criticism on theThe Meaning Constitutional of “Open Court Legalof the Policy”Republic in of VerdictsIndonesia of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta 10110 Mardian Wibowo, I Phone.Nyoman (+6221) Nurjaya, 23529000 Muchammad Fax. (+6221) 352177 Ali Safaat, and Jazim E-mail: [email protected] Hamidi Ali Safaat This journal can be downloaded on http://ejournal.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id Biography Citation is permitted with acknowledgement of the source Author Guidelines The articles in this journal do not represent the opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Thank you very much to Advisers Prof. Dr. Arief Hidayat, S.H., M.S. Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Maria Farida Indrati, S.H., M.H. Dr. H. Wahiduddin Adams, S.H., MA. Prof. Dr. Aswanto S.H., M.Si. DFM. Dr. I Dewa Gede Palguna, S.H. , M. Hum Dr. Suhartoyo, S. H. , M. H. Dr. Manahan M. P. Sitompul, S.H., M. Hum Prof. Dr. Saldi Isra, S.H., MPA. TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA December 2017, Volume 3, Number 2 CONTENTS Relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Legislators according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Fajar Laksono, Sudarsono, Arief Hidayat, and Muchammad Ali Safaat The Laws of Ratification of an International Treaty in Indonesian Laws Hierarchy Noor Sidharta The Indonesian Constitutional Court and the Democratic Institutions in Judicial Review Andy Omara A Commentary: The Inadmissibility of Non-Indonesian Citizens in Judicial Review before the Indonesian Constitutional Court Bayu Mahendra An Analysis of Subjectum Litis and Objectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court Anna Triningsih and Nuzul Qur’aini Mardiya The Criticism on the Meaning of “Open Legal Policy” in Verdicts of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court Mardian Wibowo, I Nyoman Nurjaya, Muchammad Ali Safaat, and Jazim Hamidi Biography Author Guidelines Note From Editors Note From Editors This publication is the last edition of Year 2017 of Constitutional Review (CONSREV). It presents six articles which discuss various topics such as the relation between the Indonesian Constitutional Court and the legislators, the international treaty, democratic institutions in judicial review, the commentary of non-Indonesian citizen in judicial review, the analysis of subjectum and objectum litis on authority dispute, and the criticism on open legal policy in verdicts of judicial review. It is expected the six articles would be interesting and provoke further discussion among our readers. The first article is provided by Fajar Laksono and others. They provides the analysis of the relationship between the Indonesian Contitutional Court and the legislators according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The authors found that the relationships tend to be cooperative in the implementation of the constitutional mandate of the decision, but not a priority of legislation. The second article is written by Noor Sidharta. He provides the explanation about laws of ratification of an international treaty in Indonesian law hierarchy. In relation to the cancellation of law of an intenational treaty at the Constitutional Court, he argues that there are several efforts on state administration by classifying the laws which differ the general laws from the laws whose contents are related to the international treaty. Note From Editors The next article is an article by Andy Omara. This article focuses on the relationship between the Indonesian Constitutional Court, the legislature, and the executive in judicial review. The article argues that Katharine G. Young’s typology of judicial review is quite helpful as an interpretive tool to understand the Court approaches when it decided cases related the right to work. The use of various approaches by the Court affected the relationship between the Court, the executive, and the legislature. This is because the executive and the legislature are the implementing agencies of the Court rulings. The fourth one is written by Bayu Mahendra. The article discusses the inadmissibility of non-Indonesian citizens in judicial review before the Indonesian Constitutional Court. This paper concludes that the Court’s reasoning has abandoned the constitutional loss as the very substance of legal standing and to which amounted to the immunity of legal standing provision from a judicial review. Consequently, non-Indonesian citizens will never be recognized in judicial review mechanism before the Indonesian Constitutional Court. The next article is written by Anna Triningsih and Nuzul Qur’aini Mardiya. They provide the elaboration of analysis of subjectum litis and objectum litis on dispute about the authority of state institution from the verdicts of the Constitutional Court. The article also provides some elaboration of subjectum and objectum litis from various verdicts. Finally, this journal gives an article written by Mardian Wibowo and others. It explains the criticism on the meaning of open legal policy in verdicts of judicial review at the Constitutional Court. The finding shows different meaning of open legal policy between various verdicts of the Constitutional Court. Editors iv Constitutional Review, December 2017, Volume 3, Number 2 Keywords Keywords are derived from the article This abstract page may be photocopied without prior permission and free of charge Fajar Laksono, Sudarsono, Arief Hidayat, and Muchammad Ali Safaat Relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Legislators according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Constitutional Review Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 141-170 This research aims to analyze and to describe the relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (CC) with the People Representatives’ Council and the President of the Republic of Indonesia as legislators by looking on implementation of CC’s decision through the legislation in the period 2004-2015. Using doctrinal research, it can be seen how the constitutional mandate in the CC’s decision are implemented by the legislator through the legislation. The results are: (a) legal opinions of the CC’s decision have a binding power; (b) a constitutional mandate in the legal opinion is intended as guidance for the legislators regarding what the 1945 Constitution requires; (c) directives to the legislator