An Analysis of the Tweets Posted After the Crash of Germanwings Flight 9525

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Analysis of the Tweets Posted After the Crash of Germanwings Flight 9525 Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Sarah Messiaen Automatic detection of crisis situations on social media: an analysis of the tweets posted after the crash of Germanwings Flight 9525 Masterproef voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Master in de Meertalige Communicatie 2015 Promotor Prof. Dr. Véronique Hoste Vakgroep Vertalen Tolken Communicatie PREFACE First and foremost, I would like to show my sincerest gratitude to my supervisor Prof. dr. Véronique Hoste, who has guided me from the initial to the final level of this master’s dissertation. She was a valuable help to me and she always took her time to meet and review nearly anything. Furthermore, I thank Cynthia Van Hee for helping me to perform all experiments needed to complete this paper’s study. Third, I would like to thank dr. Klaar Vanopstal for correcting some parts of this master’s dissertation. I would also like to thank my boyfriend and my friends for their moral support. And finally, I owe my deepest gratitude to my parents for supporting my throughout my studies over the past few years. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF GRAPHS AND TABLES ........................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 7 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................... 9 2.1 CRISIS COMMUNICATION ..................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 Crisis defined ........................................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 The three-stage approach to crisis management .................................................. 9 2.1.2.1 Pre crisis ……………………………………………………………...10 2.1.2.2 Crisis event …………………………………………………………...10 2.1.2.3 Post crisis ……………………………………………………………..10 2.1.3 Stealing thunder .................................................................................................. 11 2.1.4 Coombs’ Situational Crisis Communication Theory ......................................... 11 2.1.4.1 SCCT's attribution theory roots ………………………………………12 2.1.4.2 Factors that shape the reputational threat …………………………….13 2.1.4.3 Crisis types …………………………………………………………...14 2.1.4.4 Crisis response strategies ……………………………………………..15 2.1.5 Emotions in crisis communication ..................................................................... 17 2.2 SOCIAL MEDIA ....................................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 Social media defined .......................................................................................... 18 2.2.2 The role of social media in organizational crisis communication ...................... 19 2.2.3 The use of Twitter in organizational crisis communication ............................... 20 2.2.3.1 The use of Twitter by corporations …………………………………..20 2.2.3.2 The use of Twitter by citizens ………………………………………..21 4 2.3 AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF SENTIMENT AND EMOTION IN CRISIS RELATED MICROPOSTS .................................................................................................. 22 2.3.1 Automatic classification of sentiment ................................................................ 22 2.3.2 Automatic classification of emotion .................................................................. 23 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 25 3.1 EVENT OF STUDY .................................................................................................. 25 3.2 DATA COLLECTION .............................................................................................. 26 3.3 METHOD .................................................................................................................. 27 3.3.1 Sentiment detection ............................................................................................ 27 3.3.2 Emotion detection .............................................................................................. 28 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................................... 29 4.1 MOST FREQUENTLY USED WORDS AND ANALYSIS OF THE ORGANISATION’S TWEETS ........................................................................................... 29 4.2 SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................... 32 4.2.1 Quantitative discussion of English results ......................................................... 33 4.2.2 Qualitative discussion of English results ........................................................... 34 4.2.3 Quantitative discussion of Dutch results ............................................................ 36 4.2.4 Qualitative discussion of Dutch results .............................................................. 37 4.3 EMOTION CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................... 40 4.3.1 Quantitative discussion of English results ......................................................... 40 4.3.2 Quantitative discussion of Dutch results ............................................................ 42 4.3.3 Qualitative discussion ........................................................................................ 43 5. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 45 6. BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES ................................................................................. 47 7. APPENDIX ...................................................................................................................... 50 7.1 TWEETS POSTED BY THE ORGANIZATION ..................................................... 50 7.1.1 Tweets posted by Germanwings ........................................................................ 50 7.1.2 Tweets posted by Lufthansa ............................................................................... 51 7.2 CORPUS OF 200 ENGLISH TWEETS .................................................................... 52 7.3 CORPUS OF 200 DUTCH TWEETS ....................................................................... 62 5 LIST OF GRAPHS AND TABLES GRAPHS Graph 1: Word Cloud English tweets March 24-25 p. 29 Graph 2: Word Cloud English tweets March 26-31 p. 30 Graph 3: Word Cloud English tweets April 1-6 p. 30 Graph 4: Word Cloud Dutch tweets March 24-25 p. 31 Graph 5: Word Cloud Dutch March 26 – April 6 p. 31 TABLES Table 1: Crisis types definitions p. 15 Table 2: SCCT crisis response strategies p. 16 Table 3: Social media categories p. 18 Table 4: Class distribution of the English corpus p. 33 Table 5: System accuracy based on 200 gold annotations p. 33 Table 6: Class distribution based on 200 gold annotations p. 34 Table 7: Tweets that received the same label both manually and automatically p. 34 Table 8: Mistake type 1 p. 35 Table 9: Mistake type 2 p. 35 Table 10: Mistake type 3 p. 35 Table 11: Mistake type 4 p. 36 Table 12: Class distribution of the Dutch corpus p. 36 Table 13: System accuracy based on 200 gold annotations p. 37 Table 14: Class distribution based on 200 gold annotations p. 37 Table 15: Tweets that received the same label both manually and automatically p. 38 Table 16: Mistake type 1 p. 38 Table 17: Mistake type 2 p. 39 6 Table 18: Mistake type 3 p. 39 Table 19: Mistake type 4 p. 39 Table 20: Occurrence emotion classes in English gold standard corpus p. 41 Table 21: Examples of English tweets expressing emotion p. 41 Table 22: Occurrence emotion classes in Dutch gold standard corpus p. 42 Table 23: Examples of Dutch tweets expressing emotion p. 43 Table 24: Elements that could help to determine emotional content p. 44 7 ABSTRACT Social media, and in particular Twitter, are increasingly being utilized during crises. It has been shown that tweets offer valuable real-time information for decision-making. However, because of the vast amount of information, this information is not directly usable. Applying sentiment and emotion analysis is one option for distinguishing important information from unimportant information. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of automatically detecting crisis-related emotions on Twitter. Therefore, two corpora of respectively English and Dutch tweets posted after the crash of Germanwings Flight 9525 were built. For each corpus, 200 tweets were manually and automatically labelled as positive, negative or neutral. Moreover, we manually tagged the emotional content of these tweets. We found that the system used for the sentiment analysis of the English tweets performed better than the system used for the sentiment analysis of the Dutch tweets. Both systems performed well with regard to the negative class label, which is important in crisis situations. Furthermore, sympathy and anger were the most recurring emotions in the English gold standard corpus, whereas sadness and contempt were the most frequently expressed emotions in the Dutch gold standard corpus. It can be concluded that automatic systems can help to enable the automatic detection of emotions: first through sentiment analysis and then through a more fine-grained detection of emotions. 1. INTRODUCTION The
Recommended publications
  • PRESS RELEASE East Meadow, November 7, 2019
    PRESS RELEASE East Meadow, November 7, 2019 Further informations on Lufthansa Group achieves an Adjusted EBIT of EUR 1.3 billion third-quarter results: → https://investor- in the third quarter relations.lufthansagroup. com/en/publications/fina ncial-reports.html − Third-quarter result only slightly below prior-year level, despite economic slowdown and higher fuel costs − Substantially greater unit cost reduction than in the first-half year − Slower growth at Group airlines and their competitors helps counter pricing pressures in Europe − North Atlantic business still buoyant, with third-quarter performance exceeding prior-year − Full-year guidance confirmed In a challenging operating environment, Lufthansa Group achieved an Adjusted EBIT of EUR 1.3 billion for the third quarter of 2019, only slightly below the EUR 1.4 billion of the prior-year period. Against the backdrop of higher fuel costs, which were EUR 171 million above their 2018 level in the third quarter alone, the Group delivered a sound business performance for the period. “Our airlines were able to translate their premium quality and market strength into solid third-quarter earnings,” confirms Carsten Spohr, Chairman of the Executive Board & CEO of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. “At Eurowings the turnaround measures are showing first results; and at Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines and Lufthansa Cargo we will be taking tangible corrective action to improve earnings. As Europe’s leading airline group, we are on a sound and stable strategic course.” The third-quarter earnings were supported by continued strong business on North Atlantic routes. Unit costs were also substantially reduced in the third quarter, particularly at the Network Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Magisterarbeit / Master's Thesis
    MAGISTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Magisterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Krisenkommunikation Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Flugzeugunglücks der Lufthansa-Tochter Germanwings am 24. März 2015 verfasst von / submitted by Raffaela ECKEL, Bakk. phil. angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: A 066 841 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sabine Einwiller Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Die aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommenen Gedanken sind als solche kenntlich ge- macht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen Prü- fungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Wien, August 2016 Raffaela Eckel Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung und Problemstellung ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Theoretische Hinführung: Beitrag der Wissenschaft zu einer gelungenen Krisenkommunikation.................................................................................................... 2 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Communication
    Crisis communication The case of the airline industry during the COVID-19 pandemic Marlies Nittmann Supervisor: Robert Ciuchita Department of Marketing Hanken School of Economics Helsinki 2021 i HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Department of: Type of work: Marketing Master’s Thesis Author: Date: 31.3.2021 Marlies Nittmann Title of thesis: Crisis Communication: The case of the airline industry during the COVID-19 pandemic Abstract: Due to the increasing frequency of crises and the diversification of their causes, a wide range of research has been completed in this field. However, the crisis communication literature has not yet thoroughly covered the topic of public health crises and the corporate communication during such a global event. Further, examples of crisis communication used by companies in particular industries are limited. Therefore, this thesis studies the crisis communication literature to receive a better understanding of the theory before looking at the corporate communications from four European airline companies. A comparative case study approach is used in order to receive an insight into the communication strategies applied by the aviation industry during a pandemic. A quantitative study is conducted, and the web pages, newsletters and press releases are analysed. Based on the conducted research, six main topics of communication are established and compared to the previous findings of the literature. Even though the four case companies share similar information with their stakeholders, they differ in the way they approach the messages, how they communicate and when they engage with their stakeholders. This study adds to the crisis communication literature focusing on public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to the literature covering crisis communication in the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport Industry Analysis Report
    Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2016 Final Report March 2017 European Commission Annual Analyses related to the EU Air Transport Market 2016 328131 ITD ITA 1 F Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 Final Report March 2015 Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 MarchFinal Report 201 7 European Commission European Commission Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate General for Mobility and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract MOVE/E1/5-2010/SI2.579402. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Mobility and Transport DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: European Commission - DG MOVE - Library (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 Brussels e-mail (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/contact/index_en.htm) Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 W www.mottmac.com Issue and revision record StandardSta Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description ndard A 28.03.17 Various K.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair Introduces Direct Flights from Larnaka to Brussels
    2016 REVIEW SPONSORED BY: 1 www.atn.aero 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair introduces direct flights from Larnaka to Brussels JANUARY 4/1/2016 14/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today launched fresh legal action in a bid to overturn a German court’s decision to revoke the approval for 29 of its • Genève Aéroport welcomed a total of nearly 15.8 million passengers codeshare flights with airberlin in 2015 • ALTA welcomes Enrique Cueto as new President of its Executive 5/1/2016 Committee • Spirit Airlines, Inc. today announced Robert L. Fornaro has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately 6/1/2016 • FAA releases B4UFLY Smartphone App 7/1/2016 • The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced it is expanding its activities to prevent payment fraud in the air travel industry • Boeing delivered 762 commercial airplanes in 2015, 39 more than the previous year and most ever for the company as it enters its centennial year • Rynair become the first airline to carry over 100m international Source: LATAM customers in one year • American Airlines and LATAM Airlines Group are applying for • BOC Aviation orders 30 A320 Family regulatory approval to enter into a joint business (JB) to better serve their customers • Bordeaux Airport 2015 review: Nearly 5,300,000 passengers in 2015: growth of +7.6% 15/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today welcomed the ruling by the higher administrative 8/1/2016 court in Luneburg reversing an earlier judgment and allowing it to • The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger continue operating
    [Show full text]
  • Carsten Spohr's Speech
    Annual General Meeting of Deutsche Lufthansa AG Speech by the Chairman and CEO Carsten Spohr 5 May 2020 (virtual) Lufthansa Aviation Center, Frankfurt Final speech 5 May 2020 To be checked against delivery at the Annual General Meeting 1 I. Welcome Address / AGM in Times of Corona / Key Figures 2019 Dear Shareholders, I too bid you a very warm welcome to the very first virtual Annual General Meeting of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. We will be reporting to you from our Group headquarters at the Lufthansa Aviation Center in Frankfurt. I would of course much rather have welcomed you all personally to the Jahrhunderthalle in Frankfurt and answered your questions in person; however, the Corona Crisis still has a firm grip on us all and no one can say for sure for how much longer. The clip that we opened the meeting with still shows the “old” Lufthansa world – and the world before Corona. Now, only a few months later, we find ourselves in the midst of the most severe global economic slump since 1930. Once again, air transport is disproportionately affected. We decided to open our Annual General Meeting with the clip anyway, because it reflects the fascination of our industry and company, and shows where we want to return one day. It is the goal for which we are fighting tirelessly during these challenging times: the future of Lufthansa. Global air transport is currently experiencing its worst crisis ever. Almost all countries have imposed entry bans and restrictions, and as a result, our company, your company my dear shareholders, also finds itself in a state of emergency, through no fault of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • General Meeting of Deutsche Lufthansa Ag – Speech by the Chairman of the Executive Board and Ceo Carsten Spohr
    Speech GENERAL MEETING OF DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG – SPEECH BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD AND CEO CARSTEN SPOHR 4 May 2021, virtual Lufthansa Aviation Center, Frankfurt To be checked against delivery. SPEECH: General Meeting of Deutsche Lufthansa AG – Speech by the Chairman of the Executive Board and CEO Carsten Spohr Dear Shareholders, I also welcome you to the Annual General Meeting of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. Unfortunately, for the third time only virtually, from our Group headquarters, the Lufthansa Aviation Center in Frankfurt. I speak for the entire Lufthansa Executive Board when I say that we would really have liked to welcome you in person today. But it was not yet to be. You saw it earlier in the short video clip: behind us is a year that was historic in many respects. A year in which we had to bear a record loss of 5.5 billion euros. A year in which we lost two-thirds of our revenue and as many as three-quarters of our passengers, and a year in which we had to reduce the size of our workforce by one-fifth. But after this historic and unprecedented year, one thing is also certain: the Lufthansa Group will not only get through this crisis. We are using this crisis to become better. Following the three most successful years in our history, we entered this crisis through no fault of our own. We were stronger than ever, as one of the top five airline groups worldwide, profitable and solidly financed, with successful brands operating out of the economically strongest home markets in Europe and not to mention the best employees in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health
    Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37945632 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health Alexander Chu Wu A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science in the Department of Environmental Health Harvard University Boston, Massachusetts May, 2018 Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Marc G. Weisskopf Alexander Chu Wu Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health ABSTRACT Despite a decades-old call for better understanding of the role of environmental pollutant influences on mental health, a comprehensive review of the literature on non-occupational exposures to environmental pollutants and adult mental health has not been performed. Second, the Germanwings Flight 9525 crash has brought the sensitive subject of airline pilot mental health to the forefront in aviation. Third, scientists use biomarkers to evaluate metal exposures. One biomarker, toenails, is easily obtained and minimally invasive, but less commonly used as a biomarker of exposure. Their utility will depend on understanding characteristics of their variation in a population over time. Fourth, toenails are less commonly used as a biomarker of exposure and has not been evaluated on its relationship with psychiatric outcomes; particularly depression and anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019
    Ref. Ares(2021)636251 - 26/01/2021 Flight Standards Directorate Air Operations Department EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019) Air Operations Department TE.GEN.00400-006 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Page 1 of 119 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019) Document ref. Status Date Contact name and address for enquiries: European Union Aviation Safety Agency Flight Standards Directorate Postfach 10 12 53 50452 Köln Germany [email protected] Information on EASA is available at: www.easa.europa.eu Report Distribution List: 1 European Commission, DG MOVE, E.4 2 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Participating States 3 EASA website Air Operations Department TE.GEN.00400-006 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Page 2 of 119 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Table of Contents Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Lufthansa Hires More Than 4,000 New Employees in the New Year
    You are here: News & Releases > Lufthansa hires more than 4,000 new employees in the New Year Lufthansa hires more than 4,000 new employees in the New Year 01.01.16 • 2,800 flight attendants wanted at various locations. • Eurowings and Austrian Airlines are hiring 240 pilots. • More jobs for ground staff and trainees with airlines and Lufthansa Group service companies. The Lufthansa Group is hiring more than 4,000 new employees in 2016, giving the organization a top position amongst the leading German companies. “We are proud that yet again this year the companies of the Lufthansa Group are able to offer many people an exciting new outlook and attractive working conditions in the aviation industry. For many applicants the Lufthansa Group is a dream employer. We are therefore even more pleased that we can fulfill this dream for 4,000 people,” says Carsten Spohr, Chairman of the Executive Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. Flight Attendants The main focus of the new recruiting will be the flight attendant training. In 2016 approximately 2,800 flight attendants will be hired in various locations and for different airlines of the Lufthansa Group: Lufthansa 1,400 (800 in Frankfurt and 600 in Munich) SWISS 800 (in Zurich) Eurowings 360 (in Vienna, Düsseldorf and Hamburg) Austrian Airlines 200 (in Vienna) Lufthansa CityLine 30 (in Munich) Interested parties can find more information at the following link: https://www.be-lufthansa.com/en/jobs-and-apprenticeship/flight-attendant-mf/ Lufthansa Flight Attendants Lufthansa flight attendants will start in the Frankfurt and Munich hubs on short, medium and long- haul destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Lufthansa AG Herrn Carsten Spohr Und Vorstand
    Austrian Cockpit Association (ACA) Industriegewerkschaft Luftverkehr e.V. (IGL) Technik Gewerkschaft Luftfahrt (TGL) Unabhängige Flugbegleiter Organisation e.V. (UFO) ver.di – Vereinte Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft Vereinigung Cockpit e.V. (VC) c/o Vereinigung Cockpit e.V. Unterschweinstiege 10 60549 Frankfurt Mail: [email protected] Tel.: 069/695976-101 Deutsche Lufthansa AG Herrn Carsten Spohr und Vorstand Vorstandsvorsitzender Lufthansa Aviation Center 60546 Frankfurt / Main Per E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Frankfurt, 6. April 2020 #nooneleftbehind Sehr geehrter Herr Spohr, sehr geehrte Frau Förster, sehr geehrte Herren Vorstände, wir wenden uns heute gemeinsam an Sie, um Ihnen unsere Unterstützung bei allen nötigen Maßnahmen zur Stabilisierung unseres Konzerns in diesen schwierigen Zeiten zuzusichern. Wie viele andere Wirtschaftszweige und Unternehmen auch, trifft unseren Konzern die Corona- Krise unverschuldet und in besonderer Härte. Es werden große Anstrengungen und die Unterstützung aller beteiligten Mitarbeitergremien und Gewerkschaften notwendig sein, um Schaden abzuwenden und eine Zukunft nach der Krise zu sichern. Darum appellieren wir heute an Sie: Riskieren Sie nicht, durch kurzfristige, einseitig getroffene Entscheidungen über Umstrukturierungen, die Unterstützung der Mitarbeiter zu verlieren! Keines der Tochterunternehmen der Lufthansa trägt eine Schuld an dieser Krise. Keine Kollegin und kein Kollege sollte sich in seiner Existenz bedroht sehen, weil strukturelle Entscheidungen seinem direkten Arbeitgeber, der zur Lufthansa Group gehört, die Daseinsberechtigung entziehen. Jedwede Entscheidung zur Ausrichtung des Konzerns muss die Belange aller Mitarbeiter im Blick haben. Wir können uns nicht vorstellen, dass Sie einzelne Gruppen opfern und ernsthaft noch mit konstruktiver Unterstützung Ihrer Mitarbeiter anderer Gruppen rechnen. Ein „heute die, morgen wir“ wäre fatal und entspräche nicht dem Spirit in der Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Personnel Decisions at Lufthansa
    12 March 2014 Important personnel decisions at Lufthansa Karl Ulrich Garnadt to become Member of the Executive Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG and CEO of Lufthansa German Airlines Peter Gerber nominated as CEO and Chairman of Lufthansa Cargo AG Dr Bettina Volkens, Member of the Executive Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Director of Industrial Relations, responsible for Corporate Human Resources and Legal Affairs also to become Board Member and Chief Human Resources Officer at Lufthansa German Airlines. The Supervisory Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG elected Karl Ulrich Garnadt (57) to the Group's Executive Board at its meeting today in Frankfurt. He will take up his position on 1 May 2014 and assume Board responsibility for Lufthansa Passenger Airlines. He will succeed Carsten Spohr, who will become Chairman of the Executive Board and Chief Executive Officer of Lufthansa Group on 1 May. Garnadt has worked for the Lufthansa Group since 1979, including many years in a range of senior management functions at Lufthansa German Airlines and Lufthansa Cargo. He has been CEO and Chairman of Lufthansa Cargo AG since January 2011. “We are delighted to have obtained Karl Ulrich Garnadt for the Executive Board of the Lufthansa Group, as he is a very experienced aviation manager with extensive knowledge of the Group. He makes an ideal addition to the Executive Board team,” said Wolfgang Mayrhuber, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. “This selection process was conducted in close coordination with Carsten Spohr, the future Chairman of the Executive Board and CEO of Deutsche Lufthansa AG. We know that Lufthansa Passenger Airlines will be in best hands with Karl Garnadt.” Before he was appointed as CEO and Chairman of Lufthansa Cargo AG in 2011, Garnadt was already a member of the Lufthansa Passenger Airlines Board from 2007 to 2010.
    [Show full text]