DOCSLIB.ORG

Section for Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section for Report Amended - 2018 HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) 080818_Final Amended Husab Mine EMP to MET Page 1 AMENDED -2018 HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 7 2. PURPOSE OF THE HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE EMP ......................................................................... 11 2.1 Legal Requirements for an EMP ......................................................................................... 11 2.2 How this EMP will be used ................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Construction Contractors’ EMP ............................................................................ 13 2.2.2 EPCM EMP ........................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Early Mining EMP................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Induction and Environmental Awareness Training ............................................................. 14 2.3.1 Auditing EMP Compliance ................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Integrated Management System ............................................................................ 14 2.4 Environmental Issues and Management Plans .................................................................... 14 2.5 Environmental Permits/Certificates/authorisations ............................................................. 16 3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 17 4. OVERALL ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................... 18 5. SCOPE OF THE EMP ................................................................................. 21 6. PROJECT OVERVIEW .............................................................................. 22 6.1 Construction Phase .............................................................................................................. 22 6.2 Operational Phase ................................................................................................................ 22 6.3 Decommissioning and Closure ............................................................................................ 22 7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................... 37 7.1 Stakeholder Consultation and Communication Management Plan ..................................... 38 7.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 38 7.1.2 SEMP requirements ............................................................................................... 39 7.1.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 39 7.1.4 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 40 7.2 Safety and Security Management ........................................................................................ 41 7.3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 41 7.3.1 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 41 7.3.2 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 41 7.3.3 Relevant Activities ................................................................................................ 42 7.3.4 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 42 7.4 Biodiversity (Fauna and Flora) Management ...................................................................... 44 7.4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 44 7.4.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 45 7.4.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 46 080818_Final Amended Husab Mine EMP to MET Page 2 7.4.4 Relevant Activities ................................................................................................ 48 7.4.5 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 49 7.5 Surface and Stormwater Management ................................................................................. 60 7.5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 60 7.5.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 60 7.5.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 60 7.5.4 Relevant Activities ................................................................................................ 61 7.5.5 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 62 7.6 Groundwater Management .................................................................................................. 72 7.6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 72 7.6.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 72 7.6.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 72 7.6.4 Relevant Activities that could Impact on Groundwater ........................................ 73 7.6.5 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 75 7.7 Air Quality Management ..................................................................................................... 77 7.7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 77 7.7.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 77 7.7.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 79 7.7.4 Relevant Activities ................................................................................................ 79 7.7.5 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 80 7.8 Soil Management ................................................................................................................. 82 7.8.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 82 7.8.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 83 7.8.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 83 7.8.4 Relevant Activities ................................................................................................ 83 7.8.5 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 84 7.9 Visual Aspect Management ................................................................................................. 87 7.9.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 87 7.9.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 87 7.9.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 88 7.9.4 Relevant Activities ................................................................................................ 89 7.9.5 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 90 7.10 Waste Management ............................................................................................................. 90 7.10.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 90 7.10.2 SEMP Requirements.............................................................................................. 91 7.10.3 EIA Commitments ................................................................................................. 91 7.10.4 Management Plan .................................................................................................. 92 7.11 Noise Management ............................................................................................................ 106 7.11.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 106 7.11.2 SEMP Requirements...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report 2015
    SEMP: Annual Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report 2015 Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Province 2015 Annual Report April 2017 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Project Management: Ministry of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey of Namibia, Divi- sion of Engineering and Environmental Geology Status of Data Received: April 2017 Compiled by: Rosina Leonard (GSN), Michelle Hijamutiti (GSN), Israel Hasheela (GSN), Norwel Mwananawa (GSN), Alfeus Moses (GSN), Theo Was- senaar (NERMU), Sandra Müller (NUA) Contributions from: Namibian Uranium Association Final editing: Norwel Mwananawa and Alfeus Moses © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2017 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2017): Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Cen- tral Namib Uranium Mining Province, 2015 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia Additional Information and queries to: Mr. Norwel Mwananawa Coordinator Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264-61-2848111 Email: [email protected] Mr. Theo Wassenaar Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit (NERMU) Gobabeb Research and Training Centre P.O. Box 953 Walvis Bay Namibia Tel: +264-61-230752 Email: [email protected] 2015 Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report for the Central Namib Uranium Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Namibian uranium province is a pub- lic-private collaborative initiative housed within the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy and it is supported by the Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit (NERMU) at the Gobabeb Research and Training Centre. The SEMP is an over-arching framework and roadmap to address the cumulative impacts of existing and potential developments, within which individual projects have to be planned and implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Prevails
    34 RESOURCES INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Uranium prevails Development of new mines continues in the uranium sector despite current low prices for the commodity, reports Roger Murray he uranium mining and devel- tors closed (six permanently) – after On the supply side, Kazakhstan opment sector is locked into Japan’s March 2011 earthquake/ has provided some stability by this T survival mode, with cuts to tsunami seriously damaged the year pledging not to raise produc- mine production, development Fukushima nuclear plant – have tion above the 28,000t of U3O8, rep- delays and exploration spending restarted; as more come back into resenting 39% of global uranium freezes as companies struggle to operation, this will provide another output, that it produced last year. balance the books and cope with the upward impetus to demand. drop in the uranium spot price to an However, it is China’s purchase SALAMANCA SHINES 11-year low of US$24/lb for uranium of nuclear fuel for its expanding One mining development proceed- Bannerman oxide (U3O8) as of September. nuclear-plant network (an average ing is Salamanca in west-central Resources’ The principal cause of supplier six new reactors are due on line each Spain, where Berkeley Energia has heap-leach woes is continued weak demand. year until 2020) that provides the already begun initial site infrastruc- uranium Western utilities remain well-stocked main upside. Analysts see China’s ture works, with mine start-up cur- demonstration with inventory, although it is antici- continued inventory accumulation rently scheduled for 2018. plant on its pated that some at least will resume as the leading factor likely to spark Salamanca’s location in a Etango project buying activity in the next two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Esau, Swakop Uranium's Office Administrator in Swakopmund (Left
    OCTOBeR 2011 NeWS FOR THe FRIeNDS aND peOpLe OF SWaKOp URaNIUM This was the good news from the latest reserve estimate. Not only is there more uranium: the ore grade in Husab Zones 1 and 2 shows a 4% increase in forecast grade from 497 parts per million (ppm) to 518 ppm uranium oxide. It furthermore shows a 15% reduction in life-of-mine strip ratio. Total ore tonnes within the reserve have increased by 37% to 280 million tonnes. In short, we will be getting a better grade than originally thought, have to remove less waste rock to get to it, and have much more ore to process. The strip ratio now stands at 6,2:1 (previously 7,3:1), which means that just over six tonnes of waste rock have to be removed to obtain one tonne of ore. The reduction in strip ratio is expected to have a positive effect on project economics. The 20-year mine life, which includes pre-strip and ramp-up, is based on the definitive feasibility study (DFS) processing target of 15 million tonnes of ore and 15 million pounds (6 800t) of U3O8 per year. Once this production is reached, Husab will become the world’s third-largest uranium-only mine. young child grappling with his times tables in primary THaT school right now, could well be an engineer working there’s MoRe to Husab for Swakop Uranium’s proposed Husab Mine in 20 years’ time. The According to Jonathan Leslie, CEO of Extract Resources (Swakop proposed mine near Swakopmund now has a potential mine life of Uranium’s 100% shareholder), the updated reserve estimate marks the more than 20 years and uranium reserves of at least 280 million tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning with Laughter
    NOVEMBER 2013 • NEWS FOR THE FRIENDS AND PEOPLE OF SWAKOP URANIUM Like any one-year-old, the Husab Project has taken its first steps … and experienced some teething problems along the way. than half (53%) of the logistics, but we are an experienced project MORE contracts linked to the team and are managing the challenges in true world’s second-largest uranium mine have project fashion.” already been placed with Namibian-registered As a seasoned project leader, Rodney knows companies. The biggest of these is with that early teething problems come with the BarlowWorld Equipment Namibia. territory of such a large-scale project. The Husab Project, which began in October Water requirements have been met with the 2012, is certainly making its mark on the supply of desalinated water via a temporary Namibian economy. pipeline through an agreement between About 1 400 construction workers are on Swakop Uranium, NamWater and Areva. The site, of whom the vast majority (89%) are most critical geotechnical challenge is currently Learning Namibians. At peak, the project will employ at the crusher, 28 m below ground level, where between 4 000 and 6 000 people. construction is having to be adapted on an with laughter But it hasn’t been smooth sailing. ongoing basis. “As things stand now, however, we are “My school’s fun!” is written Big project, big challenges confident that the main milestones will be all over the faces of these eager Rodney Voigt, Vice-president: Projects of met,” assures Rodney. Swakop Uranium and project director for the learners at the Asser Kapere Owners Team, points out that in terms of CONTINUED ON paGE 2 pre-primary school in Arandis.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumba Resources Namibia
    ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES OF BANNERMAN MINING RESOURCES (NAMIBIA) (PTY) LTD ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE 3345 AUGUST 2020 Compiled for: Bannerman Mining Resources (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2854 Swakopmund Compiled by: A. Speiser Environmental Consultants cc / SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd P O Box 40386 Windhoek EO /EMP for Bannerman Mining Resources exploration activities on EPL 3345 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 2 LOCATION OF EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE ............................................ 4 2.1 Historical exploration areas ....................................................................................... 5 3 EXPLORATION AND REHABILITATION ................................................................... 8 3.1 Day to day activities ................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Rehabilitation of Moon landscape and viewpoints................................................... 9 4 PURPOSE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) ................... 10 5 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 11 5.1 Permits ...................................................................................................................... 12 6 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW ............................................................................... 12 6.1
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Possibilities for Agency in Statecraft in Niger and Namibia
    WORKING PAPER NO. 11 MAR 2017 China and uranium: Comparative possibilities for agency in statecraft in Niger and Namibia Peter Volberding and Jason Warner sais-cari.org WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 11 | MARCH 2017: “China and uranium: Comparative possibilities for agency in statecraft in Niger and Namibia” by Peter Volberding and Jason Warner TO CITE THIS PAPER: Volberding, Peter, and Jason Warner. 2017. China and Uranium: Possibilities for Agency in Statecraft in Niger and Namibia. Working Paper No. 2017/11. China Africa Research Initiative, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.sais-cari.org/ publications. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Peter Volberding Email: [email protected] NOTE: The papers in this Working Paper series have undergone only limited review and may be updated, corrected or withdrawn. Please contact the corresponding author directly with comments or questions about this paper. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed herein in no way represent the views of the U.S. Government. Editor: Jessica Lasky-Fink 2 CHINA-AFRICA RESEARCH INITIATIVE ABSTRACT SAIS-CARI WORKING PAPER IN 2007, A CHINESE STATE-OWNED nuclear company, CNNC, NO. 11 | FEBRUARY 2017: announced China’s first investment in a uranium mine in “China and uranium: Africa, in Niger. Five years later in 2012, another state-owned Comparative possibilities for agency in statecraft in Chinese company, CGNPG, announced its acquisition of the Niger and Namibia” rights to develop the Husab Mine in Namibia, an investment by Peter Volberding and that would become China’s single largest investment project on Jason Warner the continent. Chinese resource extraction investments have garnered both attention and notoriety, yet literature examining both Chinese investments in African uranium industries, as well as how Chinese investments have impacted the agency of African states to manage these investments, is scarce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Namibia in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook NAMIBIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior February 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Namibia By James J. Barry In 2016, the diamond sector continued to be a significant 16%, for Swakop Uranium; about 10%, for Rössing Uranium contributor to Namibia’s economy. In terms of the average Ltd.; and 9% each, for B2Gold Namibia (Pty) Ltd., De Beers value of diamond production in dollars per carat ($533), the Marine Namibia (Pty) Ltd. (Debmarine), and Skorpion Zinc and country ranked second in the world after Lesotho. In terms of Namzinc (Pty) Ltd. (Chamber of Mines of Namibia, 2017, p. 19, the total value of its rough diamond production ($915 million), 90–91). the country ranked fifth after South Africa. Namibia was ranked ninth in the world in terms of rough diamond production by Production weight (carats). Namibia’s total diamond exports were valued at In 2016, copper electrowon production increased by 54% about $1.1 billion (about 1.9 million carats of diamond) in 2016. to 16,391 metric tons (t) from 10,659 t in 2015, which was According to the World Nuclear Association, Namibia’s Rössing attributed to the Tschudi Mine reaching nameplate capacity Mine and Langer Heinrich Mine were capable of providing 10% of 17,000 metric tons per year (t/yr). Uranium production of the world’s uranium output; the Langer Heinrich Mine was increased by 22% to 3,654 t (uranium content) in 2016 from one of the leading producing uranium mines in the world. The 2,993 t in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Natural Resources in Namibia- Mining And
    i MANAGING NATURAL RESOURCES IN NAMIBIA The Mining and Fisheries Sectors Riza Aryani Mobeen Irshad Bhatti Joanna Eileen Capones Andreina Martínez Caitlin O’Donnell Mevelyn Ong Erika Yvonne Piquero Ketaki Purohit Amy Slipowitz Katherine Sullivan Lauren Waugh Haotian Zhang Faculty Supervisor: Professor Jenik Radon School of International & Public Affairs, Columbia University Spring 2016 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. iv Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... v Other Reports ...................................................................................................................................... vi List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. x List of Recommendations ................................................................................................................. xv Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Economics ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY STUDY on URANIUM ORE GRADE CONTROL TECHNIQUES for the HUSAB MINE, NAMIBIA Tuesday, 26 June 2018 16:40 (20 Minutes)
    International Symposium on Uranium Raw Material for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production, Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues (URAM-2018) Contribution ID: 52 Type: ORAL PRELIMINARY STUDY ON URANIUM ORE GRADE CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR THE HUSAB MINE, NAMIBIA Tuesday, 26 June 2018 16:40 (20 minutes) The Husab mine is situated within the Namib Desert in the Erongo region of western-central Namibia,only 6km south of the Rossing mine owned by Rio Tinto, approximately 60km east of the coast town of Swakop- mund and less than 100km northeast from the Walvis Bay Port, the largest deep water port in the southwestern Africa and thus it has convenient traffic conditions and extremely favorable infrastructure conditions forde- velopment. As the most important uranium discovery in the world since 2000, the Husab mine has total uranium resource of nearly 300,000 tons of U3O8 with ore reserves of 300 million tons containing 156,000 tons of U3O8 at average grade of 518ppmU3O8. The Husab mine is the first ultra large uranium mine under the construction and operation byChinaGeneral Nuclear Power Corporation (thereinafter “CGN” for short). Since its mine construction and pre-stripping commenced in 2013, its ore mining commenced in May 2015 and the first barrel of uranium oxide was produced on 31th Dec., 2016, indicating that the Husab mine had been constructed and put into production successfully since CGN acquired it in 2012. The Husab mine has a designed annual mining capacity of over 100 million tons, an annual ore processing capacity of 15million tons and an annual output of 6500tons of U3O8 and it will be the largest open-pit uranium mine with the largest mining capacity and ore processing capacity in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual SEMP Report
    Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Province 2016 Annual Report December 2017 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Project Management: Ministry of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey of Namibia, Divi- sion of Engineering and Environmental Geology Status of Data Received: November 2017 Compiled by: Norwel Mwananawa (GSN) and Sandra Müller (NUA) Contributions from: Geological Survey of Namibia (Israel Hasheela, Norwel Mwananawa, Alfeus Moses, Michelle Hijamutiti) DWAF (Anna David and Nicholene Likando) MET (Hiskia Mbura and Riaan Solomon) Namibian Uranium Association (Frances Anderson, Carlene Binne- man, Werner Ewald, Murray Hill, Sandra Müller, Jacklyn Mwenze, Ingrid Scholz, Zhao Xigang) NamPort (Tim Eimann) NamWater (Merylinda Conradie, Erwin Shiluama, Henry Mukendwa, Selma Muundjua and Willem Venter) NERMU (Elbé Becker and Theo Wassenaar) NRPA (Joseph Eiman) Swakopmund Municipality (Robeam Ujaha) Walvis Bay Municipality (Nangula Amuntenya, David Uushona and André Burger) Final editing: Norwel Mwananawa, Sandra Müller and Israel Hasheela © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2017 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2017): Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Cen- tral Namib Uranium Mining Province, 2016 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia Additional Information and queries to: Mr. Norwel Mwananawa Coordinator Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264-61-2848157 Email: [email protected] 2016 Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report for the Central Namib Uranium Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Namibian uranium province is a pub- lic-private collaborative initiative housed within the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/GDP.Pdf
    DEVELOPMENTAL FUSION: CHINESE INVESTMENT, RESOURCE NATIONALISM, AND THE DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS OF URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA by MEREDITH J. DEBOOM B.A., University of Iowa, 2009 M.A. University of Colorado at Boulder, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geography 2018 This thesis entitled: Developmental Fusion: Chinese Investment, Resource Nationalism, and the Distributive Politics of Uranium Mining in Namibia written by Meredith J. DeBoom has been approved for the Department of Geography John O’Loughlin, Chair Joe Bryan, Committee Member Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # 14-0112 iii Abstract DeBoom, Meredith J. (PhD, Geography) Developmental Fusion: Chinese Investment, Resource Nationalism, and the Distributive Politics of Uranium Mining in Namibia Thesis directed by Professor John O’Loughlin China’s rising global influence has significant implications for the politics of natural resource extraction and development in sub-Saharan Africa. Focusing on the uranium industry, I analyze how China’s influence operates at global, national, and sub-national scales in relation to natural resource politics in the southern African country of Namibia. Specifically, I draw on multi-methods fieldwork to evaluate 1) how Namibians are engaging with Chinese investments in mining and 2) what implications these engagements have for the politics of mining and development, including natural resource ownership and the distribution of mining-associated benefits and costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Section for Report
    Amended - 2021 HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) 20210623_Draft Amended Husab Mine EMP for public review Page 1 AMENDED -2021 HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 7 2. PURPOSE OF THE HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE EMP ......................................................................... 11 2.1 Legal Requirements for an EMP ......................................................................................... 11 2.2 How this EMP will be used ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Induction and Environmental Awareness Training ............................................................. 12 2.3.1 Auditing EMP Compliance ................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Integrated Management System ............................................................................ 12 2.4 Environmental Issues and Management Plans .................................................................... 12 2.5 Environmental Permits/Certificates/authorisations ............................................................. 14 3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 15 4. OVERALL ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROJECT .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]