2018 Annual Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018 Annual Review 1 ANNUAL 2018 2018REVIEW ANNUAL ANNUAL REVIEW Chamber of Mines of namibia VISION, MISSION & CORE VALUES N O I NDUSTR S G I Y AMBER OF I IN CH M IN HE IN V T E M R S E O H F T N R IO S O To be widely respected I To be acknowledged as F V as a safe, environmentally the champion of the N O I responsible, globally exploration and mining S I competitive and meaningful industry in Namibia. V contributor to the long term prosperity of Namibia. VISION, MISSION & CORE VALUES CORE VALUES MISSION INTEGRITY To effectively promote, encourage, protect, foster and contribute to the growth of responsible exploration TRANSPARENCY and mining in Namibia to the benefit of the country and all stakeholders. ACCOUNTABILITY COMPLIANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF Contents Inside front cover 1 Vision, mission and core values Mines in Namibia 02–05 Structure of the Chamber of Mines of Namibia i. Council Members ii. Executive Committee Mining6-7 Industry iii. Chamber of Mines Team Snapshot for 2018 8-9 10–11 Letter from CEO’s the President Foreword Activities12-21 of the Chamber of Mines in 2018 Operating22-25 Environment i. Health and Safety i. Global and local developments ii. Policy, Legislation and Infrastructure ii. Mining industry performance in 2018 iii. Activities of Chamber Committees and iii. Highlights of Minning in Namibia Sub-Committees iv. Stakeholder Engagement 26–68 Review of Companies in 2018 i. Operating Companies 69–85 ii. Development Companies Annexures iii. Exploration Companies i. Key Statistics ii. Chamber Committees and Members iii. References cover image Otjikoto pit at B2Gold Namibia’s Otjikoto gold mine iv. Abbreviations © 2018 B2Gold Namibia inside front cover image Aerial view of the Salt & Chemicals operation in Walvis Bay © 2018 Walvis Bay Salt Holdings DESIGN AND LAYOUT Turipamwe Design • www.turipamwedesign.com PRINTERS John Meinert Printers MINES IN NAMIBIA OSHAKATI ONDANGWA OPUWO KATIMA MULILO RUNDU TSUMEB 1 KAMANJAB OTAVI 2 OUTJO KOMBAT 3 KHORIXAS OTIWARONGO 4 OKAKARARA KALKFELD 23 OMARURU 5 UIS 23 STEINHAUSEN USAKOS KARIBIB HENTIES BAY 6 24 OKAHANDJA GOBABIS 13 MINES IN SWAKOPMUND 22 8 7 9 10 12 14 WINDHOEK WALVIS BAY 11 REHOBOTH NAMIBIA LEONARDVILLE 1 LEGEND 2018 Annual Review CoM KALKRAND 1. Tschudi MARIENTAL 2. Ohorongo MALTAHÖHE 3. Otjikoto 4. Okanjande Graphite 5. Otjozondu BETHANIEN 6. Navachab LÜDERITZ KEETMANSHOOP 15 7. Desert Lion 8. Rössing GRÜNAU ROSH PINAH 9. The Salt Company 16 17 KARASBURG 18 10. Husab 19 21 20 11. Salt & Chemicals NOORDOEWER ORANJEMUND 12. Langer Heinrich 13. Matchless N 14. Otjihase 15. Namdeb Northern Coastal Mines 16. Debmarine Namibia 17. Skorpion 18. Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation 19. Namdeb Southern Coastal Mines 20. Namdeb Orange River Mines 21. African Tantalum Mine 22. Namib Lead and Zinc Mine 23. Uis Tin Mine STRUCTURE OF THE CHAMBER OF MINES OF NAMIBIA STRUCTURE OF THE – Council of the Chamber of Mines – AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2018 H. Mbako Z. Kasete 1ST VICE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT S. Mueller, Alternate Member B. Tsauses, Alternate Member Orano Dundee Precious Metals Tsumeb I. Simataa M. Dawe 2ND VICE PRESIDENT B2Gold Namibia (Pty) Ltd. Skorpion Zinc 2 CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM J. Roux R. Burger R. Storrie C. Horn Langer Heinrich Uranium Ltd. Namdeb Holdings L. Davies Alternate Member Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation Rössing Uranium Y. Cai J. Sisay A. Kalili, Alternate Member Weatherly Mining Namibia Ltd. Swakop Uranium (Pty) Ltd. A. Snyman G. Botshiwe B. Britz, Alternate Member C. Movirongo, Alternate Member Salt & Chemicals (Pty) Ltd. QKR Namibia STRUCTURE OF THE CHAMBER OF MINES OF NAMIBIA D. Kullmann H.W. Schütte Namib Lead and Zinc Mining (Pty) Ltd. E. Alberts, Alternate Member OHORONGO Cement (Pty) Ltd. W. Ewald Z. Xigang B. Munro, Alternate Member E. Nakala, Alternate Member Bannerman Mining Resources Namibia Zhonghe Resources 3 CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM M. Tjipita J. Borshoff A. Z. //Gowaseb R. Schommarz Imerys Gecko Holdings Namibia (Pty) Ltd. Reptile Mineral Resources and Exploration Whale Rock Cement (Pty) Ltd. Afritin Mining Namibia (Pty) Ltd. E. Mueller (DECEASED 15.04.2019) S. Galloway HONORARY LIFE MEMBER CO–OPTED MEMBER Namibian Institute of Mining and Technology V. Petzel CHAIRPERSON, EXPLORATION COMMITTEE V. Malango B2Gold Namibia (Pty) Ltd. EX OFFICIO S. Januarie Chamber of Mines of Namibia CO–OPTED MEMBER Imerys Graphite and Carbon STRUCTURE OF THE CHAMBER OF MINES OF NAMIBIA STRUCTURE OF THE – Chamber of Mines Executive Committee – PRESIDENT Zebra Kasete 4 Dundee Precious Metals Tsumeb CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM FIRST VICE PRESIDENT SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Hilifa Mbako Irvinne Simataa AREVA Resources Namibia Skorpion Zinc CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Veston Malango Chamber of Mines of Namibia STRUCTURE OF THE CHAMBER OF MINES OF NAMIBIA STRUCTURE OF THE – Chamber of Mines Team – Veston Malango CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 5 CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM Hilma T. Nampala Lauren Davidson Signa K. Ndombo ACCOUNTANT ECONOMIST HR ADMINISTRATOR Doreen Meyer PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO CEO Drieka M. Skrywer Junias Nahambo INSTITUTIONAL WORKER CARETAKER MINING INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT: HIGHLIGHTS & PERFORMANCE MINING INDUSTRY Snapshot highlights for 2018 82 30 50 Minister of Mines Energy, PbLead ZnZinc Hon. Tom Alweendo, SnTin 207.2 65.38 118.711 reversed Additional Conditions North River Resources for Exploration Licences AfriTin commenced began with construction in October 2018, with a phased approach activities to re-open the removing a major barrier to to redevelop the the old Namib Lead and investment in exploration. Uis tin mine Zinc mine industry performance in 2018 6 Mining industry recorded a growth of 22% in 2018 which was CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM the strongest performing sector and one of the few to record growth *Spending by operating, development and exploration companies TURNOVER N$33.545 billion (N$29.29 in 2017 excl. Swakop Uranium) ROYALTIES PAID WAGES AND SALARIES N$2.063 billion (N$1.56 billion in 2017) N$6.090 billion (N$5.61 billion in 2017) EXPLORATION* EXPORT LEVIES PAID N$573.3 million N$214.6 million (N$562.1 million in 2017) (115.3 million in 2017) CORPORATE TAX PAID TOTAL TAXES PAID N$1.708 billion (N$$2.13 billion in 2017) N$3.986 billion (N$3.81 billion in 2017) CHAMBER MEMBERS SPEND ON SKILLS DEVELOPMENT SPEND ON CORPORATE SOCIAL DIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY THE ENTIRE MINING RESPONSIBILITY BY THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY* MINING INDUSTRY* • 9,042 permanent individuals • 498 temporary employees N$147.8 million N$73.1 million (Includes mining operations, development (Includes mining operations, development • 6,681 contractors and exploration companies) and exploration companies) (2017: 9,643 permanent individuals, 906 temporary employees, and 6,424 contractors) MINING INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT: HIGHLIGHTS & PERFORMANCE 22% growth of the mining industry 14% 13.3% Mining IN 2017 GDP contribution to GDP MINING SHARE OF EXPORTS 46 60 48 49 40 44 43 48 45 46 46 46 47 49 53 46 EXPORT NON–MINERAL 7 CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM 54 40 52 51 60 56 57 52 55 54 54 54 53 51 47 54 EXPORT MINERAL ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 Source: Namibia Statistics Agency 815 758 752 677 EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE 662 605 625 573 540 562 528 482 490 472 477 264 249 237 190 175 167 146 112 124 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 Source: Namibia Statistics Agency and Chamber of Mines of Namibia LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Letter from THE PRESIDENT he year 2018 marked my first year in office as President of the Chamber of Mines of Namibia. It has been a year of discovery in which I have fully learned Tthe workings of the organisation and what a vital role it continues to play in the Namibian mining sector. The Chamber of Mines is most certainly a versatile and small organisation, and through its staff compliment of a mere seven individuals, a very active Executive Committee and Council, involved and dedicated sub-committees, the organisation has time and again successfully responded to joint challenges faced by 8 industry and specific industry needs. CoM Annual Review 2018 Annual Review CoM It is with great regret that I reported at the AGM held on 7th May, 2019, yet another life lost in the mining sector, the details of which follow in this Annual Review. The industry is guided by the motto of ‘one injury is one too many,’ and under the auspices of the Chamber of Mines Safety Committee and its peer review missions to mines, we continue to strive towards creating a fatality-free and safe working environment, where we aim towards the goal of ZERO HARM. Aside from the very successful Mining Expo & Conference held on the 25th and 26th April 2018, the Chamber of Mines continued to actively engage stakeholders at all levels on industry developments and performance, the importance of mining to Namibia’s socio-economic development and on policy related matters. To further elevate the profile and prominence of the Chamber in the public space, an increased online presence on social media and indeed our own website has allowed for timeous reporting of crucial industry developments which is openly accessible by the local and international communities. Among these crucial stakeholders is Government, and the Chamber regularly engaged a number of Government organisations on mining industry developments and on policy matters. This relationship which in recent years has been titled a partnership, has proved vital in ensuring that policy makers are well-versed on the sector, enabling them to craft policies and legislation that is conducive for a sustainable evolution of the mining industry in Namibia, while ensuring that Namibians continue to derive benefits from it for generations to come.
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report 2015
    SEMP: Annual Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report 2015 Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Province 2015 Annual Report April 2017 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Project Management: Ministry of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey of Namibia, Divi- sion of Engineering and Environmental Geology Status of Data Received: April 2017 Compiled by: Rosina Leonard (GSN), Michelle Hijamutiti (GSN), Israel Hasheela (GSN), Norwel Mwananawa (GSN), Alfeus Moses (GSN), Theo Was- senaar (NERMU), Sandra Müller (NUA) Contributions from: Namibian Uranium Association Final editing: Norwel Mwananawa and Alfeus Moses © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2017 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2017): Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Cen- tral Namib Uranium Mining Province, 2015 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia Additional Information and queries to: Mr. Norwel Mwananawa Coordinator Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264-61-2848111 Email: [email protected] Mr. Theo Wassenaar Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit (NERMU) Gobabeb Research and Training Centre P.O. Box 953 Walvis Bay Namibia Tel: +264-61-230752 Email: [email protected] 2015 Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report for the Central Namib Uranium Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Namibian uranium province is a pub- lic-private collaborative initiative housed within the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy and it is supported by the Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit (NERMU) at the Gobabeb Research and Training Centre. The SEMP is an over-arching framework and roadmap to address the cumulative impacts of existing and potential developments, within which individual projects have to be planned and implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Prevails
    34 RESOURCES INDUSTRIAL MINERALS Uranium prevails Development of new mines continues in the uranium sector despite current low prices for the commodity, reports Roger Murray he uranium mining and devel- tors closed (six permanently) – after On the supply side, Kazakhstan opment sector is locked into Japan’s March 2011 earthquake/ has provided some stability by this T survival mode, with cuts to tsunami seriously damaged the year pledging not to raise produc- mine production, development Fukushima nuclear plant – have tion above the 28,000t of U3O8, rep- delays and exploration spending restarted; as more come back into resenting 39% of global uranium freezes as companies struggle to operation, this will provide another output, that it produced last year. balance the books and cope with the upward impetus to demand. drop in the uranium spot price to an However, it is China’s purchase SALAMANCA SHINES 11-year low of US$24/lb for uranium of nuclear fuel for its expanding One mining development proceed- Bannerman oxide (U3O8) as of September. nuclear-plant network (an average ing is Salamanca in west-central Resources’ The principal cause of supplier six new reactors are due on line each Spain, where Berkeley Energia has heap-leach woes is continued weak demand. year until 2020) that provides the already begun initial site infrastruc- uranium Western utilities remain well-stocked main upside. Analysts see China’s ture works, with mine start-up cur- demonstration with inventory, although it is antici- continued inventory accumulation rently scheduled for 2018. plant on its pated that some at least will resume as the leading factor likely to spark Salamanca’s location in a Etango project buying activity in the next two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Esau, Swakop Uranium's Office Administrator in Swakopmund (Left
    OCTOBeR 2011 NeWS FOR THe FRIeNDS aND peOpLe OF SWaKOp URaNIUM This was the good news from the latest reserve estimate. Not only is there more uranium: the ore grade in Husab Zones 1 and 2 shows a 4% increase in forecast grade from 497 parts per million (ppm) to 518 ppm uranium oxide. It furthermore shows a 15% reduction in life-of-mine strip ratio. Total ore tonnes within the reserve have increased by 37% to 280 million tonnes. In short, we will be getting a better grade than originally thought, have to remove less waste rock to get to it, and have much more ore to process. The strip ratio now stands at 6,2:1 (previously 7,3:1), which means that just over six tonnes of waste rock have to be removed to obtain one tonne of ore. The reduction in strip ratio is expected to have a positive effect on project economics. The 20-year mine life, which includes pre-strip and ramp-up, is based on the definitive feasibility study (DFS) processing target of 15 million tonnes of ore and 15 million pounds (6 800t) of U3O8 per year. Once this production is reached, Husab will become the world’s third-largest uranium-only mine. young child grappling with his times tables in primary THaT school right now, could well be an engineer working there’s MoRe to Husab for Swakop Uranium’s proposed Husab Mine in 20 years’ time. The According to Jonathan Leslie, CEO of Extract Resources (Swakop proposed mine near Swakopmund now has a potential mine life of Uranium’s 100% shareholder), the updated reserve estimate marks the more than 20 years and uranium reserves of at least 280 million tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning with Laughter
    NOVEMBER 2013 • NEWS FOR THE FRIENDS AND PEOPLE OF SWAKOP URANIUM Like any one-year-old, the Husab Project has taken its first steps … and experienced some teething problems along the way. than half (53%) of the logistics, but we are an experienced project MORE contracts linked to the team and are managing the challenges in true world’s second-largest uranium mine have project fashion.” already been placed with Namibian-registered As a seasoned project leader, Rodney knows companies. The biggest of these is with that early teething problems come with the BarlowWorld Equipment Namibia. territory of such a large-scale project. The Husab Project, which began in October Water requirements have been met with the 2012, is certainly making its mark on the supply of desalinated water via a temporary Namibian economy. pipeline through an agreement between About 1 400 construction workers are on Swakop Uranium, NamWater and Areva. The site, of whom the vast majority (89%) are most critical geotechnical challenge is currently Learning Namibians. At peak, the project will employ at the crusher, 28 m below ground level, where between 4 000 and 6 000 people. construction is having to be adapted on an with laughter But it hasn’t been smooth sailing. ongoing basis. “As things stand now, however, we are “My school’s fun!” is written Big project, big challenges confident that the main milestones will be all over the faces of these eager Rodney Voigt, Vice-president: Projects of met,” assures Rodney. Swakop Uranium and project director for the learners at the Asser Kapere Owners Team, points out that in terms of CONTINUED ON paGE 2 pre-primary school in Arandis.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumba Resources Namibia
    ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES OF BANNERMAN MINING RESOURCES (NAMIBIA) (PTY) LTD ON EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE 3345 AUGUST 2020 Compiled for: Bannerman Mining Resources (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2854 Swakopmund Compiled by: A. Speiser Environmental Consultants cc / SLR Namibia (Pty) Ltd P O Box 40386 Windhoek EO /EMP for Bannerman Mining Resources exploration activities on EPL 3345 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 2 LOCATION OF EXCLUSIVE PROSPECTING LICENCE ............................................ 4 2.1 Historical exploration areas ....................................................................................... 5 3 EXPLORATION AND REHABILITATION ................................................................... 8 3.1 Day to day activities ................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Rehabilitation of Moon landscape and viewpoints................................................... 9 4 PURPOSE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) ................... 10 5 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 11 5.1 Permits ...................................................................................................................... 12 6 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW ............................................................................... 12 6.1
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Possibilities for Agency in Statecraft in Niger and Namibia
    WORKING PAPER NO. 11 MAR 2017 China and uranium: Comparative possibilities for agency in statecraft in Niger and Namibia Peter Volberding and Jason Warner sais-cari.org WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 11 | MARCH 2017: “China and uranium: Comparative possibilities for agency in statecraft in Niger and Namibia” by Peter Volberding and Jason Warner TO CITE THIS PAPER: Volberding, Peter, and Jason Warner. 2017. China and Uranium: Possibilities for Agency in Statecraft in Niger and Namibia. Working Paper No. 2017/11. China Africa Research Initiative, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.sais-cari.org/ publications. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Peter Volberding Email: [email protected] NOTE: The papers in this Working Paper series have undergone only limited review and may be updated, corrected or withdrawn. Please contact the corresponding author directly with comments or questions about this paper. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed herein in no way represent the views of the U.S. Government. Editor: Jessica Lasky-Fink 2 CHINA-AFRICA RESEARCH INITIATIVE ABSTRACT SAIS-CARI WORKING PAPER IN 2007, A CHINESE STATE-OWNED nuclear company, CNNC, NO. 11 | FEBRUARY 2017: announced China’s first investment in a uranium mine in “China and uranium: Africa, in Niger. Five years later in 2012, another state-owned Comparative possibilities for agency in statecraft in Chinese company, CGNPG, announced its acquisition of the Niger and Namibia” rights to develop the Husab Mine in Namibia, an investment by Peter Volberding and that would become China’s single largest investment project on Jason Warner the continent. Chinese resource extraction investments have garnered both attention and notoriety, yet literature examining both Chinese investments in African uranium industries, as well as how Chinese investments have impacted the agency of African states to manage these investments, is scarce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Namibia in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook NAMIBIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior February 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Namibia By James J. Barry In 2016, the diamond sector continued to be a significant 16%, for Swakop Uranium; about 10%, for Rössing Uranium contributor to Namibia’s economy. In terms of the average Ltd.; and 9% each, for B2Gold Namibia (Pty) Ltd., De Beers value of diamond production in dollars per carat ($533), the Marine Namibia (Pty) Ltd. (Debmarine), and Skorpion Zinc and country ranked second in the world after Lesotho. In terms of Namzinc (Pty) Ltd. (Chamber of Mines of Namibia, 2017, p. 19, the total value of its rough diamond production ($915 million), 90–91). the country ranked fifth after South Africa. Namibia was ranked ninth in the world in terms of rough diamond production by Production weight (carats). Namibia’s total diamond exports were valued at In 2016, copper electrowon production increased by 54% about $1.1 billion (about 1.9 million carats of diamond) in 2016. to 16,391 metric tons (t) from 10,659 t in 2015, which was According to the World Nuclear Association, Namibia’s Rössing attributed to the Tschudi Mine reaching nameplate capacity Mine and Langer Heinrich Mine were capable of providing 10% of 17,000 metric tons per year (t/yr). Uranium production of the world’s uranium output; the Langer Heinrich Mine was increased by 22% to 3,654 t (uranium content) in 2016 from one of the leading producing uranium mines in the world. The 2,993 t in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Natural Resources in Namibia- Mining And
    i MANAGING NATURAL RESOURCES IN NAMIBIA The Mining and Fisheries Sectors Riza Aryani Mobeen Irshad Bhatti Joanna Eileen Capones Andreina Martínez Caitlin O’Donnell Mevelyn Ong Erika Yvonne Piquero Ketaki Purohit Amy Slipowitz Katherine Sullivan Lauren Waugh Haotian Zhang Faculty Supervisor: Professor Jenik Radon School of International & Public Affairs, Columbia University Spring 2016 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. iv Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... v Other Reports ...................................................................................................................................... vi List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. x List of Recommendations ................................................................................................................. xv Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Economics ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY STUDY on URANIUM ORE GRADE CONTROL TECHNIQUES for the HUSAB MINE, NAMIBIA Tuesday, 26 June 2018 16:40 (20 Minutes)
    International Symposium on Uranium Raw Material for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Exploration, Mining, Production, Supply and Demand, Economics and Environmental Issues (URAM-2018) Contribution ID: 52 Type: ORAL PRELIMINARY STUDY ON URANIUM ORE GRADE CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR THE HUSAB MINE, NAMIBIA Tuesday, 26 June 2018 16:40 (20 minutes) The Husab mine is situated within the Namib Desert in the Erongo region of western-central Namibia,only 6km south of the Rossing mine owned by Rio Tinto, approximately 60km east of the coast town of Swakop- mund and less than 100km northeast from the Walvis Bay Port, the largest deep water port in the southwestern Africa and thus it has convenient traffic conditions and extremely favorable infrastructure conditions forde- velopment. As the most important uranium discovery in the world since 2000, the Husab mine has total uranium resource of nearly 300,000 tons of U3O8 with ore reserves of 300 million tons containing 156,000 tons of U3O8 at average grade of 518ppmU3O8. The Husab mine is the first ultra large uranium mine under the construction and operation byChinaGeneral Nuclear Power Corporation (thereinafter “CGN” for short). Since its mine construction and pre-stripping commenced in 2013, its ore mining commenced in May 2015 and the first barrel of uranium oxide was produced on 31th Dec., 2016, indicating that the Husab mine had been constructed and put into production successfully since CGN acquired it in 2012. The Husab mine has a designed annual mining capacity of over 100 million tons, an annual ore processing capacity of 15million tons and an annual output of 6500tons of U3O8 and it will be the largest open-pit uranium mine with the largest mining capacity and ore processing capacity in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual SEMP Report
    Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Province 2016 Annual Report December 2017 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Project Management: Ministry of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey of Namibia, Divi- sion of Engineering and Environmental Geology Status of Data Received: November 2017 Compiled by: Norwel Mwananawa (GSN) and Sandra Müller (NUA) Contributions from: Geological Survey of Namibia (Israel Hasheela, Norwel Mwananawa, Alfeus Moses, Michelle Hijamutiti) DWAF (Anna David and Nicholene Likando) MET (Hiskia Mbura and Riaan Solomon) Namibian Uranium Association (Frances Anderson, Carlene Binne- man, Werner Ewald, Murray Hill, Sandra Müller, Jacklyn Mwenze, Ingrid Scholz, Zhao Xigang) NamPort (Tim Eimann) NamWater (Merylinda Conradie, Erwin Shiluama, Henry Mukendwa, Selma Muundjua and Willem Venter) NERMU (Elbé Becker and Theo Wassenaar) NRPA (Joseph Eiman) Swakopmund Municipality (Robeam Ujaha) Walvis Bay Municipality (Nangula Amuntenya, David Uushona and André Burger) Final editing: Norwel Mwananawa, Sandra Müller and Israel Hasheela © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2017 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2017): Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Cen- tral Namib Uranium Mining Province, 2016 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia Additional Information and queries to: Mr. Norwel Mwananawa Coordinator Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Windhoek Namibia Tel: +264-61-2848157 Email: [email protected] 2016 Strategic Environmental Management Plan Report for the Central Namib Uranium Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Namibian uranium province is a pub- lic-private collaborative initiative housed within the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/GDP.Pdf
    DEVELOPMENTAL FUSION: CHINESE INVESTMENT, RESOURCE NATIONALISM, AND THE DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS OF URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA by MEREDITH J. DEBOOM B.A., University of Iowa, 2009 M.A. University of Colorado at Boulder, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geography 2018 This thesis entitled: Developmental Fusion: Chinese Investment, Resource Nationalism, and the Distributive Politics of Uranium Mining in Namibia written by Meredith J. DeBoom has been approved for the Department of Geography John O’Loughlin, Chair Joe Bryan, Committee Member Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # 14-0112 iii Abstract DeBoom, Meredith J. (PhD, Geography) Developmental Fusion: Chinese Investment, Resource Nationalism, and the Distributive Politics of Uranium Mining in Namibia Thesis directed by Professor John O’Loughlin China’s rising global influence has significant implications for the politics of natural resource extraction and development in sub-Saharan Africa. Focusing on the uranium industry, I analyze how China’s influence operates at global, national, and sub-national scales in relation to natural resource politics in the southern African country of Namibia. Specifically, I draw on multi-methods fieldwork to evaluate 1) how Namibians are engaging with Chinese investments in mining and 2) what implications these engagements have for the politics of mining and development, including natural resource ownership and the distribution of mining-associated benefits and costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Section for Report
    Amended - 2021 HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) 20210623_Draft Amended Husab Mine EMP for public review Page 1 AMENDED -2021 HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 7 2. PURPOSE OF THE HUSAB MINE AND ASSOCIATED LINEAR INFRASTRUCTURE EMP ......................................................................... 11 2.1 Legal Requirements for an EMP ......................................................................................... 11 2.2 How this EMP will be used ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Induction and Environmental Awareness Training ............................................................. 12 2.3.1 Auditing EMP Compliance ................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Integrated Management System ............................................................................ 12 2.4 Environmental Issues and Management Plans .................................................................... 12 2.5 Environmental Permits/Certificates/authorisations ............................................................. 14 3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 15 4. OVERALL ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROJECT .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]