DOCSLIB.ORG

Central African Forests Commission (COMIFAC) Presentation of the USFS Land-Use Planning Guides Mission Report – May 2011 Mission Dates: April 15 – April 28, 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central African Forests Commission (COMIFAC) Presentation of the USFS Land-Use Planning Guides Mission Report – May 2011 Mission Dates: April 15 – April 28, 2011 U.S. Forest Service Technical Assistance Trip Financed by the U.S. Agency for International Development Central African Regional Program for the Environment (USAID/CARPE) Central African Forests Commission (COMIFAC) Presentation of the USFS Land-Use Planning Guides Mission Report – May 2011 Mission Dates: April 15 – April 28, 2011 Report Submitted by: Bill CONNELLY David FOURNIER Jason KO Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 COMIFAC ................................................................................................................................................... 2 USAID/CARPE ............................................................................................................................................ 2 US Forest Service ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Mission ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Pre-Workshop Session .............................................................................................................................. 4 Summary of Workshop Proceedings ......................................................................................................... 4 First Day of Workshop ........................................................................................................................... 4 Second Day of Workshop ...................................................................................................................... 5 Third Day of Workshop ......................................................................................................................... 6 Fourth Day of Workshop ....................................................................................................................... 8 Conclusions of Workshop ......................................................................................................................... 9 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Summary of recommendations to revise guides ...................................................................................... 9 Recommended Follow-up Activities to Workshop ................................................................................. 11 Guide validation .................................................................................................................................. 11 Guide Capitalization ............................................................................................................................ 11 Training of Trainers ............................................................................................................................. 12 5th guide / Regional Directive .............................................................................................................. 12 Annex 1 – Communiqué finale .................................................................................................................... 13 Annex 2 - Agenda ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Annex 3 - List of participants ...................................................................................................................... 23 Executive Summary The USAID Central African Program for the Environment (USIAD/CARPE) has funded the technical expertise of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) to work with USAID/CARPE partners on land-use planning in the 12 priority COMIFAC/CBFP landscapes in Central Africa. Specifically USFS was asked to elaborate land-use and management planning guides for the different intervention levels and areas: Landscape Level, Protected Area Macrozone, Extractive Macrozone, and Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Macrozone. These guides were designed for use by implementation partners (NGO, government, communities, and private sector) active on the ground in the 12 priority landscapes. After a testing and elaboration period, the four guides were presented to a broader regional audience through the Central African Forestry Commission (COMIFAC) for their eventual validation and wider use in the sub-region. A workshop was held in Douala April 18-22 to present the guides to COMIFAC partners to train them on the tested methodologies and gain feedback. The participants were presented with the concepts and content contained in each of the four guides, case studies of their use in COMIFAC/CBFP landscapes by partners, and requested to work in small groups to analyze the content and make recommendations for revisions and next steps. As a result of the workshop, with certain recommended revisions, the four guides were technically validated, however it was requested that national level validation and trainings by the COMIFAC member countries be pursued before the guides official regional validation by COMIFAC. Additionally, due to current program needs for such guides (PACEBCo and RAPAC), it was agreed that limited use of the guides could be advanced by these programs until the guides official validation. USAID/CARPE agreed to support USFS and COMIFAC in integrating the guides use into above said programs, as well as pursue their eventual official validation. This report is designed to complement the final report (French) produced by COMIFAC. Its goal is to provide an English summary of the workshop for USAID and future USFS missions. Introduction The goal of this report is to provide a summary analysis of the USAID/CARPE and USFS land-use planning guide presentation workshop in order to: 1. Better orient future USAID and USFS activities and detailers 2. Summarize the proceedings of the workshop 3. Summarize the presentations, reactions, and discussions from workshop participants in the large and small groups 4. Summarize the recommendations and contributions from the participants for revision of the USFS guides 5. Present the approved road map for follow-up actions for capitalization and official validation of the guides at a regional level 1 The USFS, with funding from USAID/CARPE, organized a regional land use planning guide validation workshop in Douala targeted at COMIFAC and COMIFAC partners in which the USAID/CARPE land-use planning (LUP) guides were presented. The concepts of planning were discussed, the content of the previously mentioned four (4) LUP guides was reviewed and technically validated by the participants, and a road map was drawn out for capitalization on the guides through training and official regional validation. The specific goals of the workshop were: Review the four (4) guides and integrate relevant observations for consolidation Examine, enrich and validate the guides Exchange experiences on land-use and management plans in the sub-region Discuss the content of the guides concerning the elaboration process and adoption of land-use and management plans Discuss and brainstorm possible ideas for sub-regional directives and guides related to national land-use planning The USAID/CARPE land-use planning guides were each presented along with a case study of its application in one of the COMIFAC/CBFP landscapes. Subsequent small group sessions were held to garner feedback from the participants on each guide. In the second part of the workshop, each country presented an update of land-use planning in their country related to forests and protected areas. A brainstorming session was held to discuss potential for a 5th guide or sub-regional directive on national level land-use planning. Lastly, COMIFAC, RAPAC, and PACEBCo presented ideas for capitalizing on the guides within the context of other projects and programs. Background COMIFAC The Central African Forest Commission (COMIFAC) is the principal political and technical forum for guidance, coordination, harmonization and decision-making in the conservation and sustainable management of forest and savannah ecosystems in Central Africa. Created in 1999 by the Yaoundé Declaration, COMIFAC is composed of the Forestry Ministers of its 10 member countries and has an executive secretariat (ES) based in Yaoundé, Cameroon. COMIFAC is recognized as primary coordinator for partner activities of the Congo Basin Forest Partnership (CBFP), a type II voluntary partnership whose primary aim is to enhance natural resource management and improve the standard of living in the Congo Basin. The COMIFAC Convergence Plan, last revised in 2005, has the vision of sustainable and joint management by Central African States of their forest resources for the wellbeing of their people, the preservation of biodiversity and the protection of the global environment. The Convergence Plan thus defines communal intervention strategies for governments and development partners concerning the conservation and sustainable management of forest and savannah ecosystems in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessing Impacts of Forest Governance Interventions: Learning from World Bank Experience
    MAY 2014 A PROFOR WORKING PAPER PROFOR WORKING PAPER ASSESSING IMPACTS OF FOREST GOVERNANCE INTERVENTIONS: LEARNING FROM WORLD BANK EXPERIENCE Nalin Kishor Maria Ana de Rijk ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report has been prepared by Nalin Kishor and Maria Ana de Rijk. Helpful comments and suggestions were received from Aparajita Goyal, Arianna Legovini, Avjeet Singh, Dan Miller, Dan Stein, Diji Chandrasekharan Behr, Ijeoma Emenanjo, Peter Jipp, Selene Castillo and Tuukka Castrén and Valerie Hickey. Veronica Jarrin provided operational support since the inception of this activity. Sujatha Venkat Ganeshan provided editorial, layout and publication support. This work was funded by the Program on Forests (PROFOR), a multi-donor partnership managed by a Secretariat at the World Bank. PROFOR finances forest-related analysis and processes that support the following goals: improving people’s livelihoods through better management of forests and trees; enhancing forest governance and slaw enforcement; financing sustainable forest management; and coordinating forest policy across sectors. Learn more at www.profor.info. DISCLAIMER All omissions and inaccuracies in this document are the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of the institutions involved, nor do they necessarily represent official policies of PROFOR or the World Bank. SUGGESTED CITATION Kishor, Nalin and Maria Ana de Rijk, 2014. Assessing impacts of forest governance interventions: Learning from World Bank experience. Washington DC: Program on Forests (PROFOR). Material in this paper can be copied and quoted freely provided acknowledgment is given. For a full list of publications please contact: Program on Forests (PROFOR) 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA [email protected] www.profor.info/knowledge PROFOR is a multi-donor partnership supported by the European Commission, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Trafficking in Cameroon and Republic of the Congo
    Wildlife Traffcking in Cameroon and Republic of the Congo A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Cooperation with China A / Room 032, unit 1, foreign affairs offce building, tower garden, No. 14, South Liangmahe Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing P.C / 100600 T / 86-10-8532-5910 F / 86-10-8532-5038 E / [email protected] http://www.geichina.org Acknowledgement We would like to give special thanks to UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) for its funding support on this project. We are very grateful of Mr. Simon Essissima from the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife of Cameroon and Mr. Nan Jiang from the Nanjing Forest Police College of China for their invaluable feedbacks and suggestions to the report. We would also like to thank Mme. Jiaman Jin, Executive Director of GEI, Mr. Chun Li, Senior Consultant of GEI, Mr. Peng Ren, Program Manager of Overseas Investment, Trade and the Environment, and Ms. Lin Ji, Executive Secretary of GEI for their guidance, support and participation throughout the research project. Finally, we would like to thank our interns who have contributed to the translation and editing of this report: Ms. Qiuyi Wang, Ms. Qian Zhu, Ms. Diana Gomez. 01 02 Acronyms Introduction ACFAP Congolese Wildlife and Protected Areas Agency [1] Wildlife traffcking is increasingly considered a threat to global conservation efforts. With global momentum to combat international wildlife traffcking, countries along the ANAFOR National Forest Development Support Agency "Congo Basin Forests," Greenpeace supply chain should take collective action to ensure effective disruption of the traffcking CAR Central African Republic USA, accessed August 09, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Debate on Forests and Climate Change in Central Africa
    FOREST DAY SUMMARY REPORT FOREST DAY CENTRAL AFRICA Shaping the Debate on Forests and Climate Change in Central Africa 24 April 2008, Palais des Congrès, Yaounde, Cameroon. The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), organized “Forest Day Central Africa” on 24 April 2008 in Yaounde, Cameroon. This event was a follow up of Forest Day Bali, organized by CIFOR in parallel with the 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP13-UNFCCC). The theme for Forest Day Central Africa was “Shaping the Debate on Forests and Climate Change in Central Africa ”. The aim was to raise awareness and share knowledge and experiences on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD) in Central Africa. This was achieved by bringing together researchers, NGOs, the private sector, forest communities and government officials to engage in dialogue about the issue. The first of its kind in Central Africa, Forest Day was attended by more than 150 people, including scientists, policymakers and representatives from various intergovernmental and non –governmental organizations. Results from a survey show that participants highly appreciated the event: of the 44 survey forms that were filled in, 21 people rated Forest Day as very good, 20 as good. In addition to opening and closing plenaries, the event comprised of four parallel sessions and a Forest Café. The themes of the four parallel sessions were: REDD and other forest management approaches in Central Africa; Methods, difficulties and results of forestry dynamics; the impact of REDD on rural poverty; REDD, markets and governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood and Paper-Based Products
    Wood and www.SustainableForestProds.org Paper-Based Products Sustainable Procurement of Sustainable Procurement of Wood and Guide and resource kit Paper-based Products World Business Council for Sustainable Development – WBCSD Guide and resource kit Chemin de Conches 4, 1231 Conches-Geneva, Switzerland Version 2 Update June 2011 Tel: (41 22) 839 31 00, Fax: (41 22) 839 31 31, E-mail: [email protected], Web: www.wbcsd.org VAT nr. 644 905 WBCSD US, Inc. 1500 K Street NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20005, US Tel: +1 202 383 9505, E-mail: [email protected] World Resources Institute – WRI 10 G Street, NE (Suite 800), Washington DC 2002, United States Tel: (1 202) 729 76 00, Fax: (1 202) 729 76 10, E-mail: [email protected], Web: www.wri.org www.SustainableForestProds.org Sourcing and legality aspects Origin Where do the products come from? Information accuracy Is information about the products credible? Legality Have the products been legally produced? Environmental aspects Social aspects Sustainability Local communities Have forests been sustainably and indigenous peoples managed? Have the needs of local communities or indigenous peoples Special places been addressed? Have special places, including sensitive ecosystems, been protected? Climate change Have climate issues been addressed? Environmental protection Have appropriate environmental controls been applied? Recycled fiber Has recycled fiber been used appropriately? Other resources Have other resources been used appropriately? Contributing Authors Partnership Disclaimer Disclaimer Ordering
    [Show full text]
  • Atelier Regional Oibt/Cites Sur L'afrormosia
    TO ENSURE THAT THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN AFRORMOSIA TIMBER IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO ITS CONSERVATION Report on the Regional Workshop on the international trade in Pericopsis elata (afrormosia or assamela) timber Hôtel Palm Beach, Kribi, Cameroon, 2 - 4 April 2008 ITTO/CITES Project on the Sustainable Management of Afrormosia in the Congo Basin Photos: plantation (left) & stem (right) of Pericopsis elata neer Kribi, Cameroon, by J. Ngueguim (IRAD) FULL REPORT ON THE REGIONAL OIBT/CITES WORKSHOP ON AFRORMOSIA 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. General background and issues .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Goals of the workshop ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2. CONDUCT OF THE WORKSHOP ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Ceremonial phase
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18 and Accounts Report Annual
    ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017-18 AND ACCOUNTS REPORT ANNUAL ZSL Annual Report and Accounts | 2017-18 The living collections at ZSL Zoos – such as this spectacular red-crested turaco – help CONTENTS to engage our audiences with wildlife Welcome 3 Our impacts at a glance 4 Objectives and activities ZSL 200: Our new strategy, vision, purpose and priorities 6 A world where wildlife thrives 8 Achievements and performance Working around the world 10 Our Zoos 12 Monitoring our planet 14 Developing conservation technology 16 Saving threatened species 18 Improving wildlife health 20 Conservation for communities 22 Engaging with business 24 Encouraging lifelong learning 26 Making our work possible 28 Plans for the future Looking ahead 32 Supporting ZSL Supporting our work 34 Our supporters 36 Financial review and Governance Financial summary 38 Principal risks and uncertainties 44 Governance 46 Independent Auditor’s Report 48 Financial Statements 49 2 ZSL Annual Report and Accounts 2017-18 zsl.org WELCOME Welcome The President and Director General of The Zoological Society of London introduce our review of May 2017 to April 2018. s President of The Zoological Society of London y priority as incoming Director General of the (ZSL), I am delighted to present our 2017-18 Annual world’s first and foremost zoological society Report. This marks the third year of my Presidency, has been to ensure we have a strategy in and I take great pride in being part of a conservation place as we move towards our third century of organisation like ours that continues to act as the working for wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change in the Mount Cameroon National Park Region: Local Perceptions, Natural Resources and Adaptation Strategies, the Republic of Cameroon
    DOCTORAL THESIS CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE MOUNT CAMEROON NATIONAL PARK REGION: LOCAL PERCEPTIONS, NATURAL RESOURCES AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES, THE REPUBLIC OF CAMEROON A thesis approved by the Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg Germany, in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences - Dr.rer.nat. Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Germany By Vivian Njole Ntoko Supervised by Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Matthias Schmidt Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Karin Thieme Oral examination date June 25th, 2020 ABSTRACT Climate change is influencing indigenous communities in the Global South, and it is the object of a dominant global discourse. It is particularly important to pay attention to its impact on natural resources and people’s livelihoods. Local knowledge on how forest-dependent households and communities, especially those in tropical areas, see, respond and adjust to climate change and events is useful in developing strategies to support livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptation and policies. However, local perceptions of climate change remain largely unexplored and are subject to various interpretations. This study analyses the perceptions of indigenous people around the Mount Cameroon National Park (MCNP) on the impacts of climate change on livelihoods and natural resources, and the adaptation strategies to climate change utilised by individuals, groups and communities in this regard. This is achieved through the use of quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection. The quantitative methods entail a questionnaire survey randomly administered to 200 respondents in the study villages. The qualitative methods include participatory rural appraisal (PRA) tools, analysed using MAXQDA software. The research findings indicate that the MCNP region is endowed with fauna and flora species vital to indigenous livelihoods and the national economy, but they have decreased due to climatic and non-climate threats.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN World Conservation Congress the Congress Will Drive Action on Nature-Based Recovery, Climate Change and Biodiversity Post-2020 Marseille, 3 to 11 September 2021
    IUCN World Conservation Congress The Congress will drive action on nature-based recovery, climate change and biodiversity post-2020 Marseille, 3 to 11 September 2021 High Level Event LANDSCAPES CENTRAL STAGE – EXHIBITION AREA September 5th, 2021 (2:30pm-3:15pm) High-Level Event on International Engagement for the Protection of the Congo Basin Ecosystems and their vicinity Engagement with High-Level Representatives of climate finance mechanisms: GCF, GEF, AF, CIF on biodiversity and climate finance for the Congo basin and their vicinity High-Level Event on International Engagement for the Protection of the Congo Basin Ecosystems and their vicinity, increasingly the world's most important rainforest lung and an important component of the global biosphere, which continues degrading by deforestation, which is expected to continue despite policies to prevent it. The high-level event will be making the case for a new "climate/biodiversity deal": advocating for a fair share of climate/biodiversity funding directed towards the Congo Basin rainforests: Protection and sustainable use of the Congo Basin ecosystems for an adequate share of international funding allocated to the protection of climate and biodiversity. This mean not only for more international funding for the protection of Congo Basin ecosystems for the benefits from reduced carbon emissions but also for the valuation of its biodiversity, Peatlands, marines and forests as natural heritage to the international community. An urgent call to action to save this lung of the planet - Relative to its share of global tropical forest area, the Congo Basin should receive at least 5 % of all climate finance. Assuming that the announced US$100 billion per year for the GCF are available, this would correspond to US$5 billion per year of climate finance for the Congo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 9Th Meeting of the CBFP Governing Council
    Congo Basin Forest Partnership Facilitation of the Federal Republic of Germany of the CBFP (2020-2022) Ninth Meeting of the CBFP Governing Council Chair of the CBFP Governing Council: Honourable Dr. Christian Ruck, CBFP Facilitator of the Federal Republic of Germany Co-Chair of the CBFP Governing Council: His Excellency, Mr. Jules Doret Ndongo, Minister of Forests and Wildlife of Cameroon, current President of COMIFAC 1 - Summary of the work of the CBFP Governing Council of 16 July 2021 in Douala. The Facilitation of the Federal Republic of Germany of the Congo Basin Forest Partnership (CBFP) in collaboration with the Central African Forest Commission (COMIFAC) and its current Chairmanship (MINFOF Cameroon), organised its 9th Governing Council meeting on 16 July 2021 in Douala. This meeting of the Council followed a meeting of Experts for the follow-up of the N'Djamena Conference on the elaboration of country investment plans focusing on Zoonoses, Transhumance, the Fight against Transboundary Poaching, Security and Sustainable Development between the Sahel and the Congo Basin, which was held from 12 to 15 July 2021 in the same venue. The representatives of the seven colleges of the CBFP actively participated, namely: o CBFP Regional College: ECCAS, COMIFAC; o CBFP Civil Society College: CEFDHAC-CPR and ROSCEVAC accompanied by representatives of the REFACOF and REFADD networks and RECEIAC; o CBFP International NGO College: AWF, WCS; o CBFP Private Sector College: ATIBT and Earthworm Foundations, Volcanoes Safaris; o CBFP Donor College: USA, UK, Germany; o CBFP Scientific and Academic College: CIFOR, IRET; o College of CBFP multilaterals: FAO, UNESCO and GVTC, ITTO.
    [Show full text]
  • WRI ENGLISH Text.Indd
    WRI REPORT Washington, D.C. USA and Yaoundé, Cameroon www.wri.org BENOIT MERTENS www.globalforestwatch.org MATTHEW STEIL LAWRENCE AYENIKA NSOYUNI GIDEON NEBA SHU SUSAN MINNEMEYER Cameroon Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife Yaoundé, Cameroon www.minef.cm Funded by: INTERACTIVE FORESTRY ATLAS OF CAMEROON VERSION 2.0 An Overview INTERACTIVE FORESTRY ATLAS OF CAMEROON (VERSION 2.0) AN OVERVIEW MINFOF A WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE REPORT PREPARED IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CAMEROON MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE INTERACTIVE FORESTRY ATLAS OF CAMEROON (version 2.0): AN OVERVIEW i Karen Holmes Editor Hyacinth Billings Publications Director Maggie Powell Layout Cover photographs (left to right) 1. © 2003 Maria Jacoba Van de Pol 2. © 2003 Maria Jacoba Van de Pol 3. © 2005 Richard Franco Each World Resources Institute report represents a timely, scholarly treatment of a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study topics and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwise stated, however, all the interpretation and Þ ndings set forth in WRI publications are those of the authors. Copyright © 2007 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-56973-632-4 ENGLISH ISBN 1-56973-633-2 FRENCH ii INTERACTIVE FORESTRY ATLAS OF CAMEROON (version 2.0): AN OVERVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................................vi
    [Show full text]
  • Extractive Industries and Protected Areas in Central Africa: for Better Or for Worse?
    7 EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND PROTECTED AREAS IN CENTRAL AFRICA: FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE? Georges Belmond TCHOUMBA, Paolo TIBALDESCHI, Pablo IZQUIERDO, Annie-Claude NSOM ZAMO, Patrice BIGOMBE LOGO and Charles DOUMENGE With contributions from: Pauwel DE WACHTER, Pierre Brice MAGANGA, Wolf Ekkehard WAITKUWAIT 250 The countries of Central Africa are distinguished by the abundance of both their biodiversity and natural resources, particularly minerals, gas and oil. This dual wealth could offer extraordinary opportunities for development if it is governed wisely and revenues are shared equitably (Maréchal, 2013). The economic growth and emergence plans drawn up by the States rely mainly on the exploitation of mineral resources. While mining and oil industries can be sources of employment (albeit generally modest) and wealth, they also can cause substantial environmental and socioeconomic damage (Carbonnier, 2013; Maréchal, 2013; Noiraud et al., 2017; Chuhan-Pole et al., 2020). However, this damage can be mitigated, and there also are potential opportunities for investments in biodiversity protection. Countries in the subregion grew by an average over which diverse and often antagonistic economic of 5.8% between 2001-2012, compared to 3.0% interests are now competing. between 1990-2000, enabling Central Africa to Protected areas contain not only a wealth of record the second highest growth rate in Africa over biodiversity, but also subsoil that can be important this period (BAD, 2013). This performance gener- reservoirs of mineral resources (minerals, oil, and ated a surge of optimism regarding their economic gas). These resources are coveted by multinational development prospects. Unfortunately, the antic- firms as well as small-scale prospectors.
    [Show full text]
  • African Origin of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium Vivax
    ARTICLE Received 11 Sep 2013 | Accepted 29 Jan 2014 | Published 21 Feb 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4346 African origin of the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax Weimin Liu1, Yingying Li1, Katharina S. Shaw2,GeraldH.Learn1, Lindsey J. Plenderleith3,JordanA.Malenke1, Sesh A. Sundararaman1,4,MiguelA.Ramirez1,PatriciaA.Crystal1,AndrewG.Smith1, Frederic Bibollet-Ruche1, Ahidjo Ayouba5, Sabrina Locatelli5, Amandine Esteban5, Fatima Mouacha5, Emilande Guichet5, Christelle Butel5, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke5,6, Bila-Isia Inogwabini7,Jean-BoscoN.Ndjango8, Sheri Speede9, Crickette M. Sanz10,11, David B. Morgan11,12, Mary K. Gonder13, Philip J. Kranzusch14,PeterD.Walsh15,AlexanderV.Georgiev16,w, Martin N. Muller17,AlexK.Piel15,18,FionaA.Stewart15, Michael L. Wilson19, Anne E. Pusey20,LiwangCui21, Zenglei Wang21, Anna Fa¨rnert22, Colin J. Sutherland23, Debbie Nolder23, John A. Hart24, Terese B. Hart24, Paco Bertolani25, Amethyst Gillis26, Matthew LeBreton26, Babila Tafon27,JohnKiyang28, Cyrille F. Djoko26, Bradley S. Schneider26,NathanD.Wolfe26, Eitel Mpoudi-Ngole29, Eric Delaporte5,RichardCarter30,31,RichardL. Culleton32,GeorgeM.Shaw1,4,JulianC.Rayner33, Martine Peeters5,BeatriceH.Hahn1,4 &PaulM.Sharp3,31 Plasmodium vivax is the leading cause of human malaria in Asia and Latin America but is absent from most of central Africa due to the near fixation of a mutation that inhibits the expression of its receptor, the Duffy antigen, on human erythrocytes. The emergence of this protective allele is not understood because P. vivax is believed to have originated in Asia. Here we show, using a non- invasive approach, that wild chimpanzees and gorillas throughout central Africa are endemically infected with parasites that are closely related to human P. vivax. Sequence analyses reveal that ape parasites lack host specificity and are much more diverse than human parasites, which form a monophyletic lineage within the ape parasite radiation.
    [Show full text]