Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Draft Final Report INTRODUCTION I.1 Background Due to their climatic environment and geological property, disaster risk in ASEAN area is high and it bring number of disasters to ASEAN countries. Approximately 90% of victims of natural disasters are from Asia according in accumulated total of the record from 1984 to 2013. According to the study conducted by Swiss Re1 , Asia’s metropolitan cities are most at risk from natural hazards. Based on their population exposure to five natural hazards of river flood, earthquake, tsunami, wind storm, and storm surge combined, the top five riskiest conurbations are all in East and Southeast Asia. While at the same time, today, more people move and live in cities from rural areas. By 2050, it is expected that 68 percent of the world’s population would live in urban areas. This unprecedented growth of cities, particularly in countries in the ASEAN region cause problems of resource management and land use management and poses a huge challenge to disaster risk management and sustainable development. Not only being key drivers of economic growth and political, social, and cultural hubs for its own countries, but cities are highly interconnected to the global economic system. When disasters strike such economic centers, the ripple effects can be felt for thousands of miles and years to come. In fact, Great East-Japan Earthquake in Japan Chao Phraya river great flood in Thailand both occurred in 2011 have brought not only human and economic damages but furthermore, the disasters have impacted the regional and world economy by affecting the supply chain. Under the globalization trends in modern society, once a city is hit by a disaster, it causes not only human casualties but also impacts the national, regional and, to some extent, the global economy. Hence, building urban resilience to disaster and climate risks has become an important issue in ASEAN region, and ASEAN Committee on Disaster Management (ACDM) and ASEAN counties have been addressing disaster risk reduction in regional level 1 Sundermann, L., Schelske,O., and Hausmann,P.2013 Mind the Risk. Zurich: Swiss Re. NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. I-1 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Draft Final Report I.2 Outline of the Project (1) Goal and Objectives Based on Concept Note 18 (CN 18) “Building Disaster and Climate Changes in ASEAN Cities” of AADMER Work Programme Phase 2 under ACDM Working Group on Prevention and Mitigation, this project will develop the implementation framework for CN 18. Overall, this project aims to increase the resilience of ASEAN cities to disasters through the following: 1) Establishment of a cross-sectoral collaboration mechanism at the regional level to facilitate partnerships among stakeholders in urban development planning and disaster risk reduction and climate risk management; 2) Integration of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation measures in urban development, land use planning processes, and building regulations; and 3) Improvement of the capacities of ASEAN Member States to assess urban risk and implement urban disaster and climate risk management policies and measures. (2) Expected Outputs Output 1: Establishment of a regional cross-sectoral collaboration mechanism and formation of partnerships to increase urban resilience in ASEAN; Output 2: Evaluation of candidate cities, indicator development for city resilient and commitment and partnership building for the demonstration project on risk assessment of priority cities in ASEAN Member States ; and Output 3: Development of tools on building resilient cities in ASEAN (3) Project Area: ASEAN counties (10 member states) (4) Management Structure The management structure of the project is as shown in Figure I.2.1. ACDM, each AMS, ASEAN Secretariat, AHA Centre, and the Project Team (JICA consultant Team) are the stakeholders of the project. The roles of main stakeholders of the project are summarized in Table I.2.1. NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. I-2 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Draft Final Report Source: Minutes of Meetings on the 1st Meeting of the Project Steering Committee Members for “Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN” Figure I.2.1 Management Structure of the Project Table I.2.1 Roles of the Relevant Bodies in the Project Organization Roles The ASEAN Overviewing the project (i.e. JICA will report on the progress and result of the project ) Committee on Supporting the project team to implement the project by asking member states to give the Disaster team necessary arrangements such as for gathering and providing information, gathering Management participants to any type of meetings, etc. within the responsibility of ACDM ,ASEAN (ACDM) Secretariat or ASEAN Member States Suggesting the utilization or application of the result of the project to the member states Project Overseeing and providing guidance to the implementation and management of the Steering proposed project on behalf of the ACDM Working Group. Committee Co-chairs of the ACDM Working Group on Prevention and Mitigation (Lao PDR and Thailand), ASEAN Secretariat, and JICA shall be the members of Project Steering Committee. ASEAN Joining the project as a resource organization to provide technical comments on the Secretariat implementation of the project Joining the project by participating in important meetings Provides guidance in the implementation and administration of the project. The ACDM Reviewing and evaluating the progress and result of the project and submits Working Group recommendations to ACDM. on Prevention Provides guidance and recommendations to the project team. and Mitigation Co –chairs of ACDM WG on Prevention and Mitigation report the progress and the result of the project at the opportunity of ACDM and other possible means in collaboration with JICA and the project team. Coordination with own ASEAN Member state to assist the project team in implementation of the activities such as gathering necessary information, if necessary. NIPPON KOEI CO.,LTD. PAC ET C ORP. EIGHT-JAPAN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC. I-3 Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN Draft Final Report JICA Recruiting the project team and giving instructions to the Project Team Preparing the necessary budget to implement the project Reporting the progress and the result of the project at the opportunity of ACDM and other possible means in collaboration with Co –chairs of ACDM WG on Prevention and Mitigation. Studying the comments and advice by the members above and giving instruction to the project team The Project Implementing the project with the instructions of JICA and guidance by the members Team above. Coordinating with members of ACDM Working Group on Prevention and Mitigation within the sphere of the Project Team’s Scope of Work in the course of project implementation. Reporting to the members of the Project Steering Committee. Coordination of the Project Steering Committee as a secretariat Participating in meetings of the ACDM and ACDM Working Group on Prevention and Mitigation, as necessary. Writing the draft progress and final reports of the project. Source: Minutes of Meetings on the 1st Meeting of the Project Steering Committee Members for “Building Disaster and Climate Resilient Cities in ASEAN” I.3 Project Steering Committee Discussions After JICA Project Team (consultant team) was formed in November 2015, three project steering committee meetings (PSCs) had been held. The first PSC meeting held on 25-16 June was the meeting before JICA Project Team (JPT) was formed, so both this report and the following reports to be produced in the project do not mention discussions in the first PSC. Table I.3.1 shows the main discussion results of the second PSC held on 3 December 2015, the third PSC meeting held on 7 April 2016, and the forth PSC meeting held on 27 July 2016. Table I.3.1 Record of Project Steering Committee Meeting Date Meeting Contents of Discussion December 3, 2nd Project Project Steering Committee members agreed and accepted the Inception Report. 2015 Steering Project Steering Committee members agreed the criteria of selecting cities for preparation of TOR on demonstration project in Output 2 of the Project. Committee Nomination of national project coordinators of the Project from 10 ASEAN Member States by the ACDM Focal Points was also agreed. Project Steering Committee members agreed to support the data and information collection by the Project Team. April 7, 2016 3rd Project Project Steering Committee members confirmed the validity of the progress including Steering visit to AMS discussing ASEAN Urban Resilience Forum and Middle Listed Cities for Demonstration Project on Output 2 and data collection surveys for middle listed Committee cities conducted in eight AMS. Project Steering Committee agreed to share the meeting report of the 3rd PSC Meeting to Singapore and Brunei Darussalam, and recommend their participation in the project by sharing best practices on building resilience in urban center. The committee requested the JICA Project Team to revise the Concept Note on ASEAN Urban Resilience Forum by including the following: to identify specific thematic issue on DRR and CCA to be discussed during the Forum be revised to be more concise with clear activities; to link the conduct of the Forum with ADDM, under the