DOCSLIB.ORG

Rising China: Power and Reassurance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RISING CHINA: POWER AND REASSURANCE RISING CHINA: POWER AND REASSURANCE EDITED BY RON HUISKEN Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rising_china_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Rising China : power and reassurance / editor: Ron Huisken. ISBN 9781921536588 (pbk.) 9781921536595 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: National interest--China. Confidence and security building measures (International relations)--China. Security, International. International relations. China--Foreign relations. China--Politics and government--21st century Other Authors/Contributors: Huisken, R. H. (Ronald Herman), 1946- Dewey Number: 327.51 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2009 ANU E Press Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii Contributors ix Introduction 1 Ron Huisken China’s key bilateral relationships: partners or just peers? America 1. The outlook for US–China relations 9 Ron Huisken 2. Closer and more balanced: China–US relations in transition 21 Jia Qingguo Japan 3. China–Japan relations at a new juncture 33 Zhang Tuosheng 4. Japanese perspectives on the rise of China 45 Koji Watanabe India and Russia 5. Sino–Indian relations and the rise of China 51 Sandy Gordon 6. The rise of Chindia and its impact on the world system 65 Zhao Gancheng 7. Sino–Russian relations in the ‘post’-Putin era 79 Yu Bin Alliances, military balances and strategic policy 8. How China thinks about national security 103 Xia Liping 9. China’s national defence: challenges and responses 119 Fan Gaoyue 10. China’s defence industries: change and continuity 125 Richard Bitzinger and J. D. Kenneth Boutin v Rising China: Power and Reassurance Multilateral processes: countering or reflecting regional cleavages? 11. China’s participation in Asian multilateralism: pragmatism prevails 147 Mingjiang Li 12. The perils and prospects of dragon riding: reassurance and ‘costly signals’ in China–ASEAN relations 165 See Seng Tan 13. ‘Architectural alternatives or alternatives to architecture?’ 185 Robert Ayson and Brendan Taylor vi Acknowledgements The conference on which this book is based was made possible by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Grant (with the Department of Defence as `industry partner'), awarded to the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre in 2005. The editor is indebted to the ARC and the Department of Defence for this support. In addition to the authors represented in this volume, a number of people made an invaluable contribution as panellists or discussants to the broader dialogue that took place during the course of the conference. The editor would like to express his gratitude to the following people in this regard: Dr Doug Kean from the Office of National Assessments; Dr Rod Lyon and Dr Mark Thomson from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute; Dr Malcolm Cook from the Lowy Foundation; and Professor Robin Jeffrey, Professor Hugh White, Professor Paul Dibb, Professor Geremie Barme, Professor Anthony Milner, Admiral (Rtd) Chris Barrie and Dr Richard Brabin-Smith, all from The Australian National University. vii Contributors See Seng Tan See Seng Tan is an Associate Professor at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He directs the school's research program on multilateralism and regionalism as well as its executive education department. He previously served as the Deputy Head of Graduate Studies. His most recent publication is Bandung Revisited: The legacy of the 1955 Asian±African Conference for International Order (co-edited with Amitav Acharya, 2008, National University of Singapore Press). He recently completed a stint as Visiting Research Associate at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, Asia (IISS-Asia). Koji Watanabe Koji Watanabe is Senior Fellow at the Japan Center for International Exchange. Joining the Foreign Ministry in 1956, Koji served as Japanese Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (1988±89), Italy (1992±93) and Russia (1993±96), and Minister in Beijing (1981±84), Deputy Foreign Minister, Sherpa for the G7 Houston and London summits and Japanese co-chairman of the US±Japan Structural Impediments Initiative Talks. Now President of The Japan Forum, he was on the Board of Governors of the Asia±Europe Foundation (ASEF) and the National Public Safety Commission, and former Executive Advisor to the Japan Business Federation (Keidanren). Richard A. Bitzinger Richard A. Bitzinger is a Senior Fellow with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, where his work focuses on military and defence issues relating to the Asia-Pacific region, including the challenges of defence transformation in the Asia-Pacific, regional military modernisation activities and local defence industries, arms production and weapons proliferation. Richard was previously an Associate Professor with the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (APCSS), Honolulu, Hawai'i, and also worked for the RAND Corporation, the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Affairs and the US Government. Fan Gaoyue Fan Gaoyue, born in 1952, joined the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in 1970 and has worked in the PLA Academy of Military Science since 1989. Now a Senior Colonel and Research Fellow in the academy, Fan's research and writing has focused on American affairs, including joint operations, military training, military strategy and military transformation. ix Rising China: Power and Reassurance Li Mingjiang Li Mingjiang is Assistant Professor at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His main research interests include the rise of China in the context of East Asian regional relations and Sino±American relations, China's diplomatic history and domestic sources of China's international strategies. He teaches two courses: the History and International Politics of the Cold War and Chinese Security and Foreign Policy. He received his PhD in Political Science from Boston University. He has also studied at the Foreign Affairs University (Beijing) and the Hopkins-Nanjing Center. He was a diplomatic correspondent for Xinhua News Agency from 1999 to 2001. Li has previously taught political science and Chinese politics at Boston University, Tufts University and Suffolk University. He has published and presented papers on China's domestic politics and foreign policy. Qingguo Jia Qingguo Jia is Professor and Associate Dean of the School of International Studies of Peking University. He received his PhD from Cornell University in 1988. He was a Research Fellow at the Brookings Institution between 1985 and 1986. He has taught at the University of Vermont, Cornell University, the University of California at San Diego, the University of Sydney in Australia and Peking University. He has published extensively on US±China relations, relations between the Chinese mainland and Taiwan, Chinese foreign policy and Chinese politics. Zhang Tuosheng Zhang Tuosheng is a Senior Fellow, Chairman of the Academic Assessments Committee and Director of Research with the China Foundation for International Strategic Studies. Formerly an officer in the PLA, he was posted to the United Kingdom in the early 1990s as the Deputy Defence Attaché. His main research interests are Sino±American relations, Sino±Japanese relations, Asia-Pacific security and Chinese foreign policy. Yu Bin Yu Bin is Professor of Political Science at Wittenberg University (Ohio, United States) and Senior Research Fellow at the Shanghai Association of American Studies. Yu earned his PhD from Stanford University (1991) and his MA from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (1982). Yu's professional activities have included attachments to Fudan University, Stanford University and the East West Center in Hawai'i. Yu is the author and co-author of several books and more than 60 scholarly articles. His current research focus includes China±Russia relations. x Contributors Ron Huisken Ron Huisken is Senior Fellow at the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, The Australian National University. He spent a number of years at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and the UN Centre for Disarmament Affairs before joining government (1981±2001), predominantly the Departments of Foreign Affairs and Trade and of Defence. He returned to academia in 2001 with research interests in US security policies, East Asian security processes and non-proliferation. Robert Ayson Robert Ayson directs The Australian National University's Graduate Studies in Strategy and Defence Program and is a Senior Fellow in the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, The Australian National University. He has taught in New Zealand universities and served as an adviser to the New Zealand Parliamentary Select Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. The author of Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age (2004, Frank Cass, London and New York), his research interests include strategic concepts, Asia-Pacific stability and Australia±New Zealand defence issues. Brendan Taylor Brendan Taylor is a lecturer in the Graduate
Recommended publications
  • Social Justice in an Open World – the Role Of

    Social Justice in an Open World – the Role Of

    E c o n o m i c & Social Affairs The International Forum for Social Development Social Justice in an Open World The Role of the United Nations Sales No. E.06.IV.2 ISBN 92-1-130249-5 05-62917—January 2006—2,000 United Nations ST/ESA/305 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS Division for Social Policy and Development The International Forum for Social Development Social Justice in an Open World The Role of the United Nations asdf United Nations New York, 2006 DESA The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environ- mental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint course of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises inter- ested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks devel- oped in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the mate- rial do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers.
  • Flora and Mary Beard Travel to China to Teach in the Peking Area. Flora Is 45 Years Old and Mary Is 32

    Flora and Mary Beard Travel to China to Teach in the Peking Area. Flora Is 45 Years Old and Mary Is 32

    1914 August -Flora and Mary Beard travel to China to teach in the Peking area. Flora is 45 years old and Mary is 32. Rise of Japanese power in China (through 1918) WWI begins Panama Canal opens Ernest Shackleton begins his Antarctic expedition and does not return until 1917. Willard is living in Foochow, China while Ellen and the children remain in the U.S. and live in Putnam, CT Willard is 49 years old, Ellen- 46, Phebe- 19, Gould- 18, Geraldine- 16, Dorothy- 13, Marjorie- 8, Kathleen- 6. 50th Wedding Anniversary invitation for Oliver Gould and Nancy Maria Beard. [From the collection of Virginia Beard Van Andel.] Oliver Gould Beard and Nancy Maria Nichols 50th Wedding anniversary 1914 [Photos from the collection of John and Nancy Butte.] ***** [This letter dated March 15, 1914 was written from Foochow, China by Willard to his 8 year old daughter, Marjorie. He tells about a Chinese family that lost their 2 daughters to a sudden illness and how Mr. and Mrs. Christian has to be quarantined in Willard’s house because of it. He will have a Mrs. and Miss Pitcher as boarders in his mountain house this summer. Letter donated to Yale by family in 2006.] American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions Foochow College President‟s Office Foochow, China March 15th 1914. Dear- to whom shall I address this- nothing came from Putnam this last week-let me see whose turn it is to have the letter according to my correspondence register.- it‟s Marjorie‟s turn so here it goes.
  • The Cambridge School Richard Bourke

    The Cambridge School Richard Bourke

    The Cambridge School Richard Bourke 1. What are the origins of the Cambridge School? The existence of a “Cambridge School” was first identified by J. G. A. Pocock in the early 1970s, but the description was intended to refer to an approach to the history of ideas that began to achieve prominence in the 1960s. The practitioners whom Pocock had in mind as exemplary members of this School included himself, Quentin Skinner and John Dunn. Over time, it became clear that these three figures had distinct concerns in the fields of intellectual history and political theory. Pocock himself has tended to focus his research on the history of historiography, Skinner on the history of philosophy, and Dunn on political theory understood as a branch of historical inquiry. However, in the 1960s they shared much common ground. By the end of the decade, they had all contributed to methodological debates in the history of ideas. At the same time, each of them had made significant contributions to the study of the history of political thought itself: Pocock, the eldest of the three, had produced a major account of the ideology of ancient constitutionalism in seventeenth-century English political debate; Dunn had produced his classic treatment of the political thought of John Locke; and Skinner had published original studies of the political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. What distinguished these works was their use of properly historical forms of investigation to explore the writings of past thinkers. This meant eschewing a range of historical fallacies: most importantly, anachronism, prolepsis, and teleology. It also entailed treating ideas as arguments rather than as disembodied entities.
  • Empirical Rigour, Reflexivity, and Archiving in the Social Sciences and Humanities in African Studies Marie-Aude Fouéré, Ophélie Rillon, Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle

    Empirical Rigour, Reflexivity, and Archiving in the Social Sciences and Humanities in African Studies Marie-Aude Fouéré, Ophélie Rillon, Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle

    Why Sources ? Empirical Rigour, Reflexivity, and Archiving in the Social Sciences and Humanities in African Studies Marie-Aude Fouéré, Ophélie Rillon, Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle To cite this version: Marie-Aude Fouéré, Ophélie Rillon, Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle. Why Sources ? Empirical Rigour, Reflexivity, and Archiving in the Social Sciences and Humanities in African Studies. Sources. Material & Fieldwork in African Studies, IFRA Nairobi, 2020, pp.23-42. halshs-02863918v2 HAL Id: halshs-02863918 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02863918v2 Submitted on 7 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License SOURCES Materials & Fieldwork in African Studies Varia no. 1 | 2020 Introduction: Why Sources ? Empirical Rigour, Reflexivity, and Archiving in the Social Sciences and Humanities in African Studies Marie-Aude Fouéré, Ophélie Rillon, et Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle URL: https://www.sources-journal.org/81 HAL Id: halshs-02863918 Cite this article: Fouéré, Marie-Aude, Ophélie Rillon, & Marie-Emmanuelle Pommerolle. 2020. “Why Sources ? Empirical Rigour, Reflexivity, and Archiving in the Social Sciences and Humanities in African Studies” Sources. Materials & Fieldwork in African Studies no. 1: 23-42.
  • Shanghai, China Overview Introduction

    Shanghai, China Overview Introduction

    Shanghai, China Overview Introduction The name Shanghai still conjures images of romance, mystery and adventure, but for decades it was an austere backwater. After the success of Mao Zedong's communist revolution in 1949, the authorities clamped down hard on Shanghai, castigating China's second city for its prewar status as a playground of gangsters and colonial adventurers. And so it was. In its heyday, the 1920s and '30s, cosmopolitan Shanghai was a dynamic melting pot for people, ideas and money from all over the planet. Business boomed, fortunes were made, and everything seemed possible. It was a time of breakneck industrial progress, swaggering confidence and smoky jazz venues. Thanks to economic reforms implemented in the 1980s by Deng Xiaoping, Shanghai's commercial potential has reemerged and is flourishing again. Stand today on the historic Bund and look across the Huangpu River. The soaring 1,614-ft/492-m Shanghai World Financial Center tower looms over the ambitious skyline of the Pudong financial district. Alongside it are other key landmarks: the glittering, 88- story Jinmao Building; the rocket-shaped Oriental Pearl TV Tower; and the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The 128-story Shanghai Tower is the tallest building in China (and, after the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, the second-tallest in the world). Glass-and-steel skyscrapers reach for the clouds, Mercedes sedans cruise the neon-lit streets, luxury- brand boutiques stock all the stylish trappings available in New York, and the restaurant, bar and clubbing scene pulsates with an energy all its own. Perhaps more than any other city in Asia, Shanghai has the confidence and sheer determination to forge a glittering future as one of the world's most important commercial centers.
  • Course Correction: Toward an Effective and Sustainable China Policy

    Course Correction: Toward an Effective and Sustainable China Policy

    COURSE CORRECTION: TOWARD AN EFFECTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE CHINA POLICY Task Force Report Orville Schell and Susan L. Shirk, Chairs February 2019 COURSE CORRECTION: Toward an Effective and Sustainable China Policy 1 COURSE CORRECTION: TOWARD AN EFFECTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE CHINA POLICY Task Force Report Orville Schell and Susan L. Shirk, Chairs February 2019 AsiaSociety.org/USChinaTaskForce PARTNER2 COURSE CORRECTIONORGANIZATIONS: Toward an Effective and Sustainable China Policy The Center on U.S.-China Relations was founded in 2006 and is based at Asia Society’s New York headquarters. The center undertakes projects and events which explore areas of common interest and divergent views between the two countries, focusing on policy, culture, business, media, economics, energy, and the environment. The 21st Century China Center was established in 2011 at the University of California San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy. It is a leading university-based think tank that uses original research to anchor major policy discussions on China and U.S.-China relations. IN COLLABORATION WITH The Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands is an independent nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to convening global leaders in the public, private, and nonprofit sectors to promote world peace, facilitate international agreement, and seek solutions to the most difficult challenges facing the world today. © 2019 Asia Society. All rights reserved. Asia Society Center on U.S.-China Relations 725 Park Avenue New York, NY 10021 212-288-6400 AsiaSociety.org/ChinaCenter The Asia Society Center on U.S.-China Relations and the Asia Society take no institutional positions on matters of public policy and other issues addressed in the reports and publications they sponsor.
  • Goodbye to Film School: Please Close the Door on Your Way Out

    Goodbye to Film School: Please Close the Door on Your Way Out

    7 Goodbye to Film School: Please Close the Door on Your Way Out T o b y M i l l e r am not an expert on film schools, though I used to work in one. Nor have I I undertaken an exhaustive analysis of the six hundred such entities that sup- posedly exist across the United States. 1 But here I am, writing about that sym- bolic behemoth of the film school, the United States. Three film schools stand out among the putative six hundred: the University of Southern California (USC—a private university in Los Angeles), the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA—part of the state’s é lite ten-campus public sys- tem), and New York University (NYU—also private, and where I taught for over a decade). The Hollywood Reporter ’s list of the top 25 film schools has those three in the top five, along with the Beijing Film Academy and the American Film Institute.2 I am particularly interested in these three universities because they are Research-One schools and hence produce ruling-class hegemons and scholarly researchers as well as factory fodder / creatives for world cinema. And their film academies started early—USC in 1929, UCLA in 1947, and NYU in 1965. I’ve drawn on experience, anecdotal repute, and political-economic-environmental analysis to investigate the culture of these film schools, their employment impact, their cost, and their future. Here’s my headline: film schools shouldn’t exist. They should be schools of media and cultural studies, dedicated to displacing both the residual humani- ties (textual analysis and history) and the emergent humanities (business stud- ies).
  • Comparison of Constitutionalism in France and the United States, A

    Comparison of Constitutionalism in France and the United States, A

    A COMPARISON OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED STATES Martin A. Rogoff I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 22 If. AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM ..................... 30 A. American constitutionalism defined and described ......................................... 31 B. The Constitution as a "canonical" text ............ 33 C. The Constitution as "codification" of formative American ideals .................................. 34 D. The Constitution and national solidarity .......... 36 E. The Constitution as a voluntary social compact ... 40 F. The Constitution as an operative document ....... 42 G. The federal judiciary:guardians of the Constitution ...................................... 43 H. The legal profession and the Constitution ......... 44 I. Legal education in the United States .............. 45 III. THE CONsTrrTION IN FRANCE ...................... 46 A. French constitutional thought ..................... 46 B. The Constitution as a "contested" document ...... 60 C. The Constitution and fundamental values ......... 64 D. The Constitution and nationalsolidarity .......... 68 E. The Constitution in practice ...................... 72 1. The Conseil constitutionnel ................... 73 2. The Conseil d'ttat ........................... 75 3. The Cour de Cassation ....................... 77 F. The French judiciary ............................. 78 G. The French bar................................... 81 H. Legal education in France ........................ 81 IV. CONCLUSION ........................................
  • China's Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape

    China's Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape

    China's Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape │ 3 China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the global trade, investment and finance landscape China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) development strategy aims to build connectivity and co-operation across six main economic corridors encompassing China and: Mongolia and Russia; Eurasian countries; Central and West Asia; Pakistan; other countries of the Indian sub-continent; and Indochina. Asia needs USD 26 trillion in infrastructure investment to 2030 (Asian Development Bank, 2017), and China can certainly help to provide some of this. Its investments, by building infrastructure, have positive impacts on countries involved. Mutual benefit is a feature of the BRI which will also help to develop markets for China’s products in the long term and to alleviate industrial excess capacity in the short term. The BRI prioritises hardware (infrastructure) and funding first. This report explores and quantifies parts of the BRI strategy, the impact on other BRI-participating economies and some of the implications for OECD countries. It reproduces Chapter 2 from the 2018 edition of the OECD Business and Financial Outlook. 1. Introduction The world has a large infrastructure gap constraining trade, openness and future prosperity. Multilateral development banks (MDBs) are working hard to help close this gap. Most recently China has commenced a major global effort to bolster this trend, a plan known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). China and economies that have signed co-operation agreements with China on the BRI (henceforth BRI-participating economies1) have been rising as a share of the world economy.
  • Inventing 'Humanity': Early- Modern Perspectives

    Inventing 'Humanity': Early- Modern Perspectives

    [Intellectual History Archive 5, 2018] Kontler, Inventing ‘humanity’ INVENTING ‘HUMANITY’: EARLY- MODERN PERSPECTIVES László Kontler1 Central European University I. Introduction This essay addresses a crucial chapter in the development of the modern concept of humanity (mankind , humanité, Menschheit) in European culture. 2 It is not an empirical study based on primary research, rather an attempt to sketch an analytical framework for approaching and understanding a broad array of specific historical topics and phenomena within the parameters of an encompassing theme. The methodological assumption at its heart is trivial: our concept of ‘humanity’ is not an intrinsic one, but a contextually defined cultural product shaped by processes of philosophical, historical, social-anthropological and political self-reflection, and of encounter with ‘others’ in modern times, which all raised important and disturbing questions about the differentiae specifica of the human kind. In tackling some of these questions and significant answers to them during the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, I focus on early-modern versions of three important intellectual frameworks that determined the consideration of the diversity versus unity, and diversity within unity, of mankind. These are, first, the temporalization of human difference: the notion that such difference is largely a matter of patterns in the development of human faculties and relations both among men and between them and their environment across (virtual) time. Second, the historicization of nature: the study of nature on the basis of the collection and ordering of data about phenomena as they actually exist in space as well as in time. Third, the naturalization of man: the study of humans without the ascription of a special status to them, with the approach of the naturalists, as coequal from the methodological point of view with any other product of the Creation.
  • How China's Censorship and Influence Affect Films Worldwide

    How China's Censorship and Influence Affect Films Worldwide

    October 28, 2015 Directed by Hollywood, Edited by China: How China’s Censorship and Influence Affect Films Worldwide Sean O’Connor, Research Fellow, Economics and Trade and Nicholas Armstrong, Esq., Research Fellow Disclaimer: This paper is the product of professional research performed by staff of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, and was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission’s website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.- China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, the public release of this document does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission, any individual Commissioner, or the Commission’s other professional staff, of the views or conclusions expressed in this staff research report. Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................3 Background ................................................................................................................................................................4 China’s Growing Film Market ...................................................................................................................................5 China’s Film Industry Development ......................................................................................................................6
  • Intellectual Property and the Academic Community

    Intellectual Property and the Academic Community

    NAPAG NATIONAL ACADEMIES POLICY ADVISORY GROUP Intellectual Property & the Academic Community THE BRITISH ACADEMY THE CONFERENCE OF MEDICAL ROYAL COLLEGES THE BRITISH ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY MARCH 1995 ISBN 0 85403 496 X © NAPAG Copies of this report may be obtained from: The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG £19.90 FOREWORD In 1983 in her foreword to Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation – the Nicholson report – the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher stated: ‘individuals generating new ideas, whether in universities, companies, Government research establishments, or even in schools, should take very seriously indeed the protec- tion of those ideas’. This philosophy has been promoted vigorously since that report and there is now a greater awareness of the value of ideas. However, which ideas should be protected and when? Who should exploit them and how? Who should profit? These questions have become increasingly difficult to answer. There is inevitably a potential conflict between the openness of scientific research and the competitiveness of the commercial world. The fundamental problem is how to operate the patent system in a way that encourages both research and its exploitation. The National Academies Policy Advisory Group was formed in 1992 and in Spring 1993 it was agreed that the spectrum of issues thrown up by intellectual property required the mul- tifaceted approach that NAPAG could offer. Thus, a working party comprising scientific, tech- nological, medical, ethical, commercial and legal expertise began work in June 1993. The working party consulted widely and I would like to thank all those who contributed to its deliberations.