Amlight Express and Protect (Exp) • RXP: Atlanticwave-SDX

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amlight Express and Protect (Exp) • RXP: Atlanticwave-SDX ! IRNC Kickoff Meeting Internet2 Global Summit Washington DC April 26, 2015 Julio Ibarra Florida International University Principal Investigator [email protected] Outline ! • Backbone: AmLight Express and Protect (ExP) • RXP: AtlanticWave-SDX 2 AmLight Today • 4 x 10G links – Two topologies and – Two submarine cable systems to increase resilience and support for experimentation • SDN Ring: Miami-São Paulo, São Paulo-Santiago, Santiago- Miami – 20G total capacity – Full Openflow 1.0 and network virtualization support – Uses Brocade devices • MPLS Ring: Miami-Fortaleza, Fortaleza-Rio, Rio-São Paulo, São Paulo-Miami – 20G total capacity – Layer2 support via L2VPN – Uses Juniper devices • Mutual redundancy between SDN and MPLS rings 3 AmLight 2015-2017 • OpenWave 100G alien wave – U.S., Brazil, Latin America – Experimentation is initial focus – In the AmLight SDN domain – What we learn will enable our next 20 years • 100G to AL2S, Miami- Jacksonville is operational • 140G aggregate capacity using spectrum and leased circuits 4 AmLight Express and Protect (ExP) 2018-2031 • AmLight Express: – 300GHz of spectrum: Santiago-São Paulo, and São Paulo-Miami – Spectrum to be configurable by RENs to meet user/ application requirements • AmLight Protect: – 40G leased capacity ring – Miami, São Paulo, Santiago, Panama City, Miami – AMPATH, Southern Light, REUNA, and RedCLARA operated • Potential for unprecedented regional resilience for U.S.- Latin America, and U.S.- Europe connectivity, supporting global science 5 research AmLight ExP Challenges • Bandwidth capacity into the U.S. on I2, ESnet and regionals – 680G+ capacity into the U.S. • How to make the best use of spectrum to meet the network services requirements of LSST and other science drivers – Guidance and lessons learned form OpenWave • Quality of Service – Bandwidth Guarantee in an OpenFlow/SDN network – Dynamic application load-balancing • Security – Secure access with network virtualization – Isolation between applications • Networking – Multipath TCP – Scalability – IP/IPv6/Multicast Routinng – Inter-SDN domain forwarding (SDX) 6 AtlanticWave-SDX Project • AtlanticWave-SDX (Awave-SDX) is building a distributed intercontinental experimental SDX in response to a growing demand to: – Support end-to-end services • Capable of spanning multiple SDN domains • Dynamic provisioning of end-to-end L2 circuits • Network programmability – Provide more intelligent network services to • Foster innovation • Increase network efficiency • Florida International University (FIU) and Georgia Institute of Technology (GT) are implementing AtlanticWave-SDX, in collaboration with other exchange points supporting SDN 7 Conceptual Design • AtlanticWave-SDX conceptual design is comprised of two components: – A Network Infrastructure Development Component • Bridges 100G of network capacity between the R&E backbone networks in the U.S. and S. America – An Innovation Component • Builds a distributed intercontinental experimental SDX between the U.S. and South America • Leverages open exchange point resources at SoX (Atlanta), AMPATH (Miami), and Southern Light (São Paulo, Brazil) 8 Virtual SDX Abstraction • In a traditional IXP – Each participating AS connects a BGP speaking border router to a shared layer2 network, and – A BGP route server 1` %:C()*(,G. `:H 1QJ(^,)V.;(01V1.(Q`(89_ • In an SDX !"#! !"#$ !"#+ %VIQ V#!"#* – Each AS can run SDN applications that specify policies ) – The SDX combines the policies of *+) , *+, multiple ASes into a single coherent -JR101R%:C()!(]QC1H1V5 policy for the physical switches !:JRGQ6() !:JRGQ6(* !:JRGQ6(, !:JRGQ6(+ – The SDX controller gives each AS !"$%QJ `QCCV` the illusion of its own virtual SDN ,QI]Q51 V(8CQ1R`%CV(VJ `1V5 switch connecting its border router to each of its peer ASes • The Virtual SDX concept is 6 ,-$!11 H.1J$$3:G`1H important for both: – Scaling the SDX architecture, and – Providing end users (or their 7 application developers) with direct % control over their own traffic <Q% V(!V`0V` throughout the network 9 Network Infrastructure Development Component • Years 1 and 2: – Upgrade AMPATH IXP infrastructure to support 140G in year 1 – Deploy new technologies at AMPATH to fully support SDN in its switching fabric • Years 3, 4 and 5: – Upgrade the switching capacity at AMPATH to receive 6 100G links from AmLight ExP – Extend capacity to Jacksonville over the FLR network to the Internet2 AL2S – FLR will provide two sets of 250GHz channels in its backbone, provisioned over diverse paths 10 Innovation Component • Three options of deployment for SDX: – Option 1: • Single SDX controller managing entire IXP switch fabric – Option 2: • Intermediate slice manager – allows individual controllers to be handed a slice of network resources – While isolating resources from others – Most practical approach in near term – Option 3: • Creates a hierarchy of controllers with a local controller at each IXP managed by a separate higher-level controller 11 Science Drivers • Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) – Image transfer south-to-north for transient alert processing – Data Release Catalog – Control Information – Calibration Information – User access of scientific data in the Data Access Centers • Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) • U.S. Astronomy Observatories in Chile – CTIO, Gemini-South, SOAR, others – Dark Energy Camera (DECam) • LHC Open Network Environment (LHCONE) – HEP experiments are moving towards more dynamic workflows and data management, – Significant increases in utilization of network resources in an active way • Ultra-High Definition (UHD) Video – 4K UHD (8.3M pixels) and 8K UHD (33.2 Mpixels) – Minimum bandwidth requirement of 300Mbps with low packet loss and low jitter rates 12 AtlanticWave-SDX Challenges • Executing AtlanticWave SDX for Boca and Miami Locations, over all switch / optical infrastructure • Environment for researchers and practitioners to collaborate at-scale – Retaining graduate students for development of SDX – Prototyping for SDN applications and services – Scientific instruments on demand – Application specific infrastructure on demand • SDX is a virtualized service – A dedicated slice on AL2S and AmLight – Create a multi-domain high-capacity distributed exchange point interconnecting AtlanticWave RXPs: • MANLAN, MAX GigaPoP, WIX, SoX, AMPATH, Southern Light • Increase bandwidth between AmLight connectors and I2 AL2S from 20G to 100G. Very soon. • Full support for OpenFlow between AmLight and Internet2 – Internet2 AL2S and AmLight SDN directly connected via OSCARS 13 .
Recommended publications
  • With Fewer Than 50 Days to Go Before the Super
    With fewer than 50 days to go before the Super Computing 2004 conference, high-energy physics researchers at the University of Sao Paulo recognized the opportunity to showcase their active involvement in the global computational Grid. They asked the CIARA (Center for Internet Augmented Research and Assessment) team at FIU, and the ANSP (Academic Network of Sao Paulo) team to leverage their expertise, along with AMPATH to create a 2.5 Gigabit per second (Gbps) connection for research from the conference center floor in Pittsburgh, to the computational clusters in Brazil. To do this, a team was formed of Telecom Italia Sparkle's Latin American Nautilus, providing the submarine cable capacity; Cisco Systems, providing critical components for the end-to-end connection; Terremark, providing space and support in their Network Access Points (NAPs) in both MIami and Sao Paulo; FPL Fibernet, providing crucial links in Miami; and Qwest Communications and Internet2's Abilene network, providing high-performance connectivity from Miami to Pittsburgh. The result of this collaboration was a contribution to the winning team of the 2004 bandwidth challenge, allowing them to exceed their goal of 100Gbps. The new link between Miami and Sao Paulo set a new speed record for U.S. to Brazilian research networking at a sustained 1.66Gbps, with bursts up to 2Gbps. This new link increases 45 times the bandwidth capacity between the US and Brazil. This is a first step in bringing research connectivity in the Gigabit range for U.S. to Latin American research efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of an International Exchange Point: Distributed Network Monitoring Using Monalisa and Netflow1
    Anatomy of an International Exchange Point: Distributed Network Monitoring Using MonALISA and NetFlow1 Ernesto Rubi, Xun Su, Iosif Legrand, Heidi Alvarez, Julio Ibarra2 Abstract: In this paper we present a distributed network monitoring system, which exploits MonALISA (Monitoring Agents in A Large Integrated Services Architecture), a distributed web service delivery infrastructure designed to collect and process the network monitoring information. We augment the capability of MonALISA with FlowTools, the popular NetFlow data analysis toolset. We demonstrate how to integrate MonALISA and Flowtools via an UDP-listening agent ApMon, and highlight a case study of AMPATH, an international exchanging point located in Miami and serving a number of South American National Reseach and Education Networks (NRENs). Our experience showcases the elegant design philosophy of a scalable distributed service deployment platform coupled with the open-source traffic analysis tools and its impact on the daily operation of the production networks. Keywords: NetFlow, MonALISA, Flowtools, Network monitoring. 1. Introduction As the Internet expands both in its scope, reach and capacity, it becomes evident that there is a strong need to develop a distributed network monitoring infrastructure that can be scaled to support various network topology, traffic granularity and user applications. NetFlow[1] is a widely deployed router-based traffic monitoring mechanism. FlowTools[2] is a open-source NetFlow analysis toolset underlying the data gathering and analysis infrastructure of our project. It is our main motivation to effectively use NetFlow to gain crucial understanding of the traffic characteristics of the networks we operate. In particular, we are interested in understanding how to exploit the key advantages and avoid drawbacks of NetFlow-based traffic analysis by augmenting it with a distributed service-deployment platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting to the GENI Network 18 August 2010
    Connecting to the GENI Network 18 August 2010 Brandon Williams Indiana University 1 Contents Cover page………………………………………………………………………… 1 Contents……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Executive Summary………………………………………...................... 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 4 Internet2…………………………………………………………………………… 5 About Internet2……………………………………………………...5 Internet2 initiatives……………………………………………… 5 Other Internet2 details………………………………………… 6 Characteristics of the Internet2 Network…………....... 6 How to connect to Internet2………………………............ 9 NLR………………………………………………………............................. 10 About NLR……………………………………………………………….10 Characteristics of the NLR network………………………… 11 How to connect to NLR………………………………………….. 14 The GENI Network…………………………………………………………….. 15 The GENI organization…………………………………………… 15 The GENI rationale………………………………………………… 16 GENI control frameworks………………………………………. 17 The GENI architecture…………………………………………… 18 Connecting to the GENI network……………............................ 19 References………………………………………………………………………… 21 2 Executive Summary The Global Environment for Network Innovations (GENI), a project sponsored by the National Science Foundation, is a virtual laboratory at the frontiers of network science and engineering for exploring future internets at scale. There is currently no public document that explains how international networks can connect to GENI. This document explains US R/E networks providing GENI connectivity and how to connect to them and ultimately to GENI. Important things to know when connecting to
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Research and Education Networks And
    An overview of research and education networks and interconnectivity around the world JET Roadmap Meeting Heather Boyles Director, International Relations, Internet2 [email protected] 14 April 2004 Purpose “…..start the session by painting a global picture of the state of international connectivity, who the players/sponsors are, where the connections are and what the pipe types/sizes are. “….give your view of where you think the growth will be, what you see as the major issues and how you think the JET can help” Caveats I’m absolutely sure I’ve missed pieces of information here There are many in the room who are intimately involved in many of these projects – so please add/correct/contribute! I’ve tried to take a global view, but we all wear our particular tint of glasses….. What’s the point? JETnets supporting user communities with needs for access to or interacting with collaborators, facilities, data sources outside the US JET charter is to coordinate networking activities, operations, and plans, between multiple Federal agency networks (represented by DOD, DOE, NASA, and NSF), the NGI, and Internet2 Despite precipitous drop in international (esp. trans-oceanic) bandwidth, still expensive • at minimum – sharing plans, information • at maximum – jointly leveraging international connectivity, aggregating, sharing bandwidth internationally • NGIX – international exchange points coordination activities Some generalizations The idea of national research (and education) networks (NRNs or NRENS) has really taken off • New NRENs in Latin
    [Show full text]
  • SEMI ANNUAL RESEARCH REPORT January – July 2015 Acknowledgements
    SEMI ANNUAL RESEARCH REPORT January – July 2015 Acknowledgements This report would not be possible without the hard work and dedication of the investigators, research coordinators, and administrative support staff who make up AMPATH’s research community. We appreciate all their contributions to this report. AMPATH’s co-directors of research, Professors Winstone Nyandiko and Rachel Vreeman deserve special recognition for their constant support in the development of this report. Their leadership continues to strengthen the Research Program. Editorial Team Shawn Grinter Jepchirchir Kiplagat-Kirui David Plater Eunice Walumbe Copyright © October 2015 – AMPATH Research Program Office Contacts Jepchirchir Kiplagat-Kirui David Plater AMPATH Research Network Administrative Manager AMPATH Research Network Administrative Manager (Kenya) (North America) AMPATH Center IU Center for Global Health P.O. Box 4606 702 Rotary Circle, RO101E Eldoret, Kenya Indianapolis, IN 46202 Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected] Phone: +254 53 203 3471 ext. 3719 Phone: +1-317-274-9189 Fax: +254 53 206 1992 Fax: +1-317-274-9124 Please visit the AMPATH Research Program website to learn how our research programs are helping improve the health of the Kenyan people. www.medicine.iu.edu/ampathresearch CONTENTS Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................. i Grants .....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redclara: Regional Network in Latin America
    RedCLARA: regional network in Latin America I2MM Spring 2009 Michael Stanton [email protected] Chair, CLARA Techical Committee CLARA and CKLN/ C@ribnet • CLARA is the regional association of NRENs in Latin America (LA) • CLARA operates the LA regional R&E network – RedCLARA – which joins together NRENs from several countries bordering on the Caribbean • Many of our international links cross the Caribbean • We would like to offer our support for R&E networking initiatives in the Caribbean The LA experience in advanced R&E networking • After the establishment of Internet2 in 1996, “advanced networks” became a new paradigm to be pursued by the Reasearch and Education (R&E) community • The first steps in LA were taken by Mexico, with cross-border connections to the US, and by the AMPATH project at FIU, Miami, which began linking South American networks to the US Internet2 Connectivity in Latin America by 2002 AMPATH • used new submarine cable • connected Argentina, Brazil (2), Chile, Venezuela • 45 Mbps AMPATH • all connections are point to point from Miami, and thence to Abilene Mexico • cross-border connections to USA (Texas and California) State of Latin American NRENs in 2002 Established education and research networks: • With dedicated Internet2 connections: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Venezuela • Some with dedicated int’l connectivity: Cuba, Uruguay Education and research networks were being re-established (present nat’l/int’l connectivity through commercial ISPs) • Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Paraguay, El Salvador No education/research network (most connected to Internet via commercial ISPs): Nicaragua, Honduras Europe and the @LIS iniciative • Through GÉANT, the European R&E community enjoyed high bandwidth connectivity with N.
    [Show full text]
  • Kim's Layout Lesson Interior 8.Indd
    (100G) AL2S FIU/OpenWave (100G) AL3S Internet2 via Baton Rouge FLR ext Pop/SoX/TelX Internet2 via Atlanta (10G) (10G Dedicated Wave) Pensacola Crestview Tallahassee PSC Jacksonville UWF Bay County Lake City FSU UNF Gainesville UFL LEGEND FLR Optical Pop Site FLR Optical Amp Site Tavares FIU/OpenWave Equity Member Orlando (FUTURE) Datasite (100G) FLR OnRamp Tampa UCF Lake Nona Winter Melbourne FLR Backbone Fiber Haven USF FLR Member Fiber InLand Fiber FIT Copyright 2014, Florida LambdaRail, LLC All Rights Reserved FGCU KEY FACTS West Palm Beach FAU COVERAGE: 1,540 MILES NSU Backbone Capacity: 20Gbps Ft. Lauderdale Ownership: 12 Equity Partners - 9 Public Universities FIU Miami (NOTA) - 3 Private Universities AOML/NOAA Links to other regional, national UM and international networks FIU/AMPATH FIU/OpenWave FIU/AmLight (100G) AtlanticWave FLORIDA’S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION NETWORK Furthering Research, Advancing Education, and Supporting Economic Growth through the Deployment of Next Generation Network Technologies (100G) AL2S FIU/OpenWave (100G) AL3S Internet2 via Baton Rouge FLR ext Pop/SoX/TelX Internet2 via Atlanta (10G) (10G Dedicated Wave) Pensacola Crestview Tallahassee PSC Jacksonville UWF Bay County Lake City FSU UNF Gainesville UFL LEGEND FLR Optical Pop Site FLR Optical Amp Site Tavares FIU/OpenWave Equity Member Orlando (FUTURE) Datasite (100G) FLR OnRamp Tampa UCF Lake Nona Winter Melbourne FLR Backbone Fiber Haven USF FLR Member Fiber InLand Fiber FIT Copyright 2014, Florida LambdaRail, LLC All Rights Reserved FGCU KEY FACTS West
    [Show full text]
  • World Network Speed Record Shattered
    World Network Speed Record Shattered Caltech, SLAC, Fermilab, CERN, Michigan, Florida, Brookhaven, Vanderbilt and Partners in the UK, Brazil, Korea and Japan Set 131.6 Gigabit Per Second Mark During the SuperComputing 2005 Bandwidth Challenge SEATTLE, WA -- For the third consecutive year, the “High Energy Physics” team of physicists, computer scientists and network engineers led by the California Institute of Technology, the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), Fermilab and CERN and partners at the University of Florida, Vanderbilt and the Brookhaven National Lab, as well as international participants from the UK (University of Manchester, and UKLight), Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State University, UERJ, and the State Universities of São Paulo, USP and UNESP)., Korea (Kyungpook National University, KISTI) and Japan (the KEK Laboratory in Tsukuba) joined forces to set a new world record for data transfer, capturing first prize at the Supercomputing 2005 (SC|05) Bandwidth Challenge (BWC). The HEP team’s demonstration of “Distributed TeraByte Particle Physics Data Sample Analysis" achieved a peak throughput of 151 gigabits per second (Gbps), and an official mark of 131.6 Gbps measured by the BWC judges on 17 of the 22 optical fiber links used by the team, beating their previous mark for peak throughput of 101 Gbps by 50%. The record data transfer speed is equivalent to downloading five full DVD movies per second, or serving 10,000 MPEG2 HDTV movies simultaneously in real time, or transmitting all of the printed content of the Library of Congress in 10 minutes. The team sustained average data rates above the 100 Gbps level for several hours for the first time (as shown in the figure below), and transferred a total of 475 Terabytes of physics data among the team’s sites throughout the US and overseas within 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • FLR Corporate Brochure FINAL 2016.Indd
    (100G) AL2S FIU/OpenWave (100G) AL3S Internet2 via Baton Rouge FLR ext Pop/SoX/TelX Internet2 via Atlanta (10G) (10G Dedicated Wave) Pensacola Crestview Tallahassee PSC Jacksonville UWF Bay County Lake City FSU UNF Gainesville UFL LEGEND FLR Optical Pop Site FLR Optical Amp Site Tavares FIU/OpenWave Equity Member Orlando (FUTURE) Datasite (100G) FLR OnRamp Tampa UCF Lake Nona Winter Melbourne FLR Backbone Fiber Haven USF FLR Member Fiber InLand Fiber FIT Copyright 2014, Florida LambdaRail, LLC All Rights Reserved FGCU KEY FACTS West Palm Beach FAU COVERAGE: 1,540 MILES NSU Backbone Capacity: 20Gbps Ft. Lauderdale (100Gbps capacity anticipated July 2015) Ownership: 12 Equity Partners FIU Miami - 9 Public Universities (NOTA) AOML/NOAA - 3 Private Universities UM Links to other regional, national and international networks FIU/AMPATH FIU/OpenWave FIU/AmLight (100G) AtlanticWave FLORIDA’S 100 Gbps RESEARCH AND EDUCATION NETWORK Furthering Research, Advancing Education, and Supporting Economic Growth through the Deployment of Next Generation Network Technologies (100G) AL2S FIU/OpenWave (100G) AL3S Internet2 via Baton Rouge FLR ext Pop/SoX/TelX Internet2 via Atlanta (10G) (10G Dedicated Wave) Pensacola Crestview Tallahassee PSC Jacksonville UWF Bay County Lake City FSU UNF Gainesville UFL LEGEND FLR Optical Pop Site FLR Optical Amp Site Tavares FIU/OpenWave Equity Member Orlando (FUTURE) Datasite (100G) FLR OnRamp Tampa UCF Lake Nona Winter Melbourne FLR Backbone Fiber Haven USF FLR Member Fiber InLand Fiber FIT Copyright 2014, Florida LambdaRail,
    [Show full text]
  • Current Optical Infrastructure in the Americas: New Opportunities for Science and Technology in the Hemisphere
    Current Optical Infrastructure in the Americas: New Opportunities for Science and Technology in the Hemisphere Dr. Saúl Hahn Organization of American States FIU- AMPATH Workshop: Fostering Collaboration and Next Generation Infrastructure Miami, Florida, January 29-31, 2003 Workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Florida International University Initial Development of the Internet in Latin America and the Caribbean based on Satellite (role played by the OAS/RedHUCyT, NSF) Role of The OAS/RedHUCyT in Connectivity Schematic configuration of academic and research • The OAS, through the networks connected via satellite, early 1990’s RedHUCyT project, assisted in the connection to the Internet , for the first time, of many of the Latin American and Caribbean Countries . Most of the connections were achieved via satellite into the US. The OAS financed earth stations and other basic equipment. Key collaboration with NSF. • Countries paid telecommunications recurrent costs, which were very high and the capacity of the connection was limited, (64 K)bps, but it was a good start. OAS/RedHUCyT CONACYT Mexico © 1999 OEA/RedHUCyT - Derechos Reservados OEA/RedHUCyT •Currently, the recently installed infrastructure of fiber-optics networks in the region provides new levels of connectivity between the countries of the Hemisphere . This opens exciting new possibilities for cooperation in advanced technological and scientific applications. Examples of this level of cooperation: • AMPATH (AR, BR, CH, USA, other countries) •CUDI (MX, US); agreements with other countries including Canada •Internet2 (US, Canada, Europe, Asia, Latin America) •Star Tap • CLARA (Latin American Cooperation of Advanced Networks) which is comprised of academic networks. CLARA is being sponsored OAS/RedHUCyT by the EU, @LIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Vasilka Chergarova, Research Coordinator Center for Internet Augmented Research and Assessment (CIARA) Florida International University 305-348-4105 [email protected] AtlanticWave-SDX demonstrates its first distributed Software- Defined Exchange controller Miami, Florida, September 29th, 2016 – During the 2016 Global Lambda Integrated Facility meeting, co- located with the 2016 Internet2 Technology Exchange, in Miami, the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) and Florida International University (FIU) demonstrated the first version of the AtlanticWave-Software Defined Exchange (SDX) distributed network controller. Conference participants had the opportunity to interact with the development team, provide feedback and establish new partnerships. The lead software developer, Sean Donovan, presented the challenges of developing an SDX controller to domain scientists and network engineers. These challenges range from identifying switches that support 100GE and OpenFlow 1.3, to interpreting the language of network to domain scientists that may not be familiar with it, to allow network control Application Programming Interface (API) development possible. The AtlanticWave-SDX controller under development will support research, experimental deployments, prototyping and interoperability testing, on national and international scales. During the demonstration, the SDX controller source code was made available [1], and an updated demonstration is planned for the Supercomputing 2016, from November 14-17th, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Russ Clark, Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech, also announced that the first prototype would be released before the end of 2016 and production deployments will start early next year, involving three Academic Open Exchange Points: Southern Crossroads (SoX) in Atlanta, AMPATH in Miami and SouthernLight (SoL) in Sao Paulo/Brazil, using the AmLight Software Defined Network (SDN).
    [Show full text]
  • UC2019 White Paper SACS-Light V1.4
    Collaborative opportunity to leverage network infrastructure in the southern hemisphere between Africa, Brazil, and the U.S. Heidi MORGAN1*, Julio IBARRA2, Jeronimo BEZERRA2, Luis Fernandez LOPEZ 2,3, Vasilka CHERGAROVA 2, Donald A. “Chip” COX III 4, Michael STANTON5, Aluizio HAZIN5, Len LOTZ6, Siju MAMMEN7 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA, Email: [email protected] 2Florida International University, Miami, USA Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 3Academic Network of São Paulo (ANSP), Email: [email protected] 4Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA, Email: [email protected] 5Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa (RNP), Email: [email protected], [email protected] 6Tertiary Education and Research Network of South Africa (TENET), Email: [email protected] 7National Research and Education Network in South Africa (SANReN), Email: [email protected] Abstract Linking South and North America via a South Atlantic high-performance Research & Education Network (REN) with the researchers, students, and knowledge sharing communities of the nations of Africa has become an increasingly strategic priority. Africa offers research and education communities with unique biological, environmental, geological, anthropological and cultural resources. Research challenges in atmospheric and earth sciences, materials sciences, tropical diseases, biology, astronomy and other disciplines will benefit by enhancing the technological and social connections between the research and education communities of the U.S., Brazil / Latin America and Africa. For many years, we have seen the dramatic benefits of high-performance networking in all areas of science and engineering. The Americas Africa Research and eduCation Lightpaths (AARCLight) project (NSF OAC- 1638990) provided support for a grant to plan, design, and define a strategy for high-capacity research and education network connectivity between the U.S.
    [Show full text]