DOCSLIB.ORG

I SD/MI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2019-2020 8. Prof. Dr Amien Rais

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I SD/MI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2019-2020 8. Prof. Dr Amien Rais PEMERINTAH KOTA MALANG DINAS PENDIDIKAN PENILAIAN AKHIR SEMESTER (PAS) I SD/MI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2019-2020 Muatan : Kemuhammadiyahan Nama : ……………… Kelas : VI ( Enam ) Alokasi Waktu : 90 Menit I. Pilihlah jawaban yang paling tepat! 1. Tapak suci berasaskan . a. Islam c. Kesombongan b. Kesesatan d. Kekuatan 2. Salah satu santri Pondok Pesantren Binorong yang kemudian menjadi Jenderal besar Indonesia adalah . a. Soedirman c. Achyat b. M. Yasin d. M. Yazid 3. Perguruan pencak silat yang melandasi diri secara tegas untuk meninggalkan ilmu pencak silat yang mengandung kesesatan dan syirik adalah perguruan . a. Cikauman c. Kasegu b. Seranoman d. Kosegu 4. Masa pendidikan dan pelatihan pada jenjang siswa ditempuh sekurang-kurangnya selama . a. 2 bulan c. 6 bulan b. 2 tahun d. 6 tahun 5. Tepi hitam pada lambang Tapak Suci berarti . a. Kejujuran c. Kekal abadi b. Kerendahan hati d. Kekuatan 6. Secara keseluruhan arti dari keseluruhan lambang tersimpul pada nama Tapak Suci dibawah ini, kecuali . a. Bertekad bulat mengagungkan asma Allah yang kekal dan abadi b. Dengan keberanian menyebarkan keharuman dengan sempurna c. Dengan kesucian menunaikan Rukun Islam dan Rukun Iman d. Mengutamakan kesombongan dan tinggi hati 7. Salah satu pendiri Muhammadiyah di Gembong Jawa Tengah adalah kakek Amien Rais, yang bernama . a. M.Wahib c. K.H Busyro b. Suhud Rais d. Wiryo Soedarmo 8. Prof. Dr Amien Rais lahir pada tanggal . a. 25 April 1944 c. 27 April 1944 b. 26 April 1944 d. 28 April 1944 9. Pada Muktamar Muhammadiyah ke – 42 di Yogyakarta Prof. Dr. Amien Rais terpilih menjadi . a. Ketua PP Muhammadiyah c. Presiden RI b. Penggerak Reformasi d. Ketua MPR RI 10. Prof. Dr. Amien Rais menyelesaikan studinya di kota Yogyakarta, di perguruan tinggi UGM pada tahun . a. 1978 c. 1968 b. 1998 d. 1974 11. Prof. Dr. Amien Rais menjabat menjadi Ketua PP Muhammadiyah pada periode . a. 1999 – 2000 c. 2005 - 2007 b. 2000 – 2005 d. 1995 - 1998 12. Salah satu prinsip yang dimiliki Amien Rais adalah . a. Hidup untuk mencari ridha Allah b. Hidup untuk mencari ridha Ibu c. Hidup untuk mencari ridha orang tua d. Hidup untuk mencari ridha Ayah 13. Tujuan dari reformasi adalah . a. Memperbaiki tatanan politik, ekonomi, hokum dan social b. Memperbaiki tatanan kehutanan , ekonomi, hokum dan social c. Memperbaiki tatanan politik, perusahaan, hokum dan social d. Memperbaiki tatanan politik, ekonomi, hokum dan olahraga 14. Sapaan akrab Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif adalah . a. Buya Hamka c. Buya Syafi’ie b. Buya Amien d. Buya Ahmad 15. Kesibukan dan kebiasaan sehari-hari dari Buya Syafi’ie adalah . a. Membaca dan menulis buku c. Berdagang dan menulis buku b. Bertani dan berdagang d. Bertani dan membaca buku 16. Setamat Sekolah Rakyat Ibtida’iyah di kampung kelahirannya, Buya Syafi’ie akhirnya melanjutkan sekolahnya ke madrasah . a. Mu’allimin Muhammadiyag Surabaya b. Mu’allimin Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta c. Mua’allimin Muhammadiyah Makasar d. Mua’allimin Muhammadiyah Semarang 17. Kalimat bersahaja yang diucapkan pada mukaddimad pidato pengukuhan Guru Besarnya di IKIP Yogyakarta adalah . a. Rendah hati adalah refleksi dari iman b. Rendah hati adalah refleksi dari melamun c. Rendah hati adalah refleksi dari hasil melukis d. Rendah hati adalah refleksi dari jalan - jalan 18. Masa jabatan Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif menjadi Ketua PP Muhammadiyah pada periode . a. Masa jabatan 2000 – 2005 b. Masa jabatan 2000 – 2004 c. Masa jabatan 2000 – 2003 d. Masa jabatan 2000 – 2002 19. Kepakarannya Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif dibidang sejarah semakin teruji setelah memperoleh gelar Master dari . a. Universitas Indonesia b. Universitas Al-Azhar c. Universitas Malaysia d. Ohio State University, America 20. Ma’arif Institute didirikan pada tahun . a. 2000 c. 2002 b. 2001 d. 2003 II. Isilah titik – titik dibawah ini dengan jawaban yang benar! 21. Putra K.H Syuhada yang lahir pada tahun 1872 bernama . 22. Pendekar yang menjuarai kejuaraan Nasional junior di Bali tahun 1985 adalah . 23. Keilmuan Tapak Suci bersifat . dan . 24. Ikrar anggota Tapak Suci putera Muhammadiyah diawali dengan 2 kalimat syahadat, yaitu . 25. Muktamar permusyawaratan PP Tapak Suci dilaksanakan setiap . 26. Amien Rais terpilih pada Muktamar Muhammadiyah ke – 43 yang dilaksanakan di kota . 27. Amien Rais juga dikenal sebagai bapak . 28. Amien Rais dilahirkan di kota . 29. Amien Rais memiliki sifat jujur, istiqomah dan berani menyuarakan kebenaran tidak lepas dari bimbingan Ibundanya yang bernama . 30. Cita – cita Amien Rais sejak kecil ingin menjadi walikota, sedangkan ketika sudah SMA, Amien Rais ingin menjadi . 31. Orang yang sanggup menyelesaikan persoalan umat dan bangsa hendaknya memiliki . 32. Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif adalah seorang sejarawan dan ahli filsafat, tetapi di tengah masyarakat Yogyakarta beliau lebih dikenal sebagai seorang . 33. Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif menjadi Pimpinan Redaksi Majalah Suara Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta pada tahun . hingga . 34. Selain sebagai mantan Ketua Umum PP Muhammadiyah, Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif juga mantan Presiden . yang merupakan motor dari pendiri Ma’arif Institute 35. Motto yang diusung majalah Suara Muhammadiyah adalah . III. Jawablah pertanyaan – pertanyaan dibawah ini dengan jawaban yang benar! 36. Jelaskan motto dari Tapak Suci! ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 37. Sebutkan 3 perguruan pencak silat yang melatar belakangi berdirinya Tapak suci! ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 38. Pada hari pertamanya di pucuk pimpinan MPR, Amien Rais mengajukan delapan agenda yang akan dijalankan selama lima tahun kedepan. Sebutkan 3 agenda tersebut! ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 39. Sebutkan 3 nilai keteladanan yang dapat kita inspirasi dari Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif! ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 40. Ceritakan secara ringkas riwayat pendidikan Prof. Dr. Ahmad Syafi’ie Ma’arif mulai Madrasah, Sarjana, Pasca hingga Doktoral! ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ “ SELAMAT MENGERJAKAN “ TTD Orang Tua Nilai Guru Kelas VI ___________________ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gus Dur, As the President Is Usually Called
    Indonesia Briefing Jakarta/Brussels, 21 February 2001 INDONESIA'S PRESIDENTIAL CRISIS The Abdurrahman Wahid presidency was dealt a devastating blow by the Indonesian parliament (DPR) on 1 February 2001 when it voted 393 to 4 to begin proceedings that could end with the impeachment of the president.1 This followed the walk-out of 48 members of Abdurrahman's own National Awakening Party (PKB). Under Indonesia's presidential system, a parliamentary 'no-confidence' motion cannot bring down the government but the recent vote has begun a drawn-out process that could lead to the convening of a Special Session of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) - the body that has the constitutional authority both to elect the president and withdraw the presidential mandate. The most fundamental source of the president's political vulnerability arises from the fact that his party, PKB, won only 13 per cent of the votes in the 1999 national election and holds only 51 seats in the 500-member DPR and 58 in the 695-member MPR. The PKB is based on the Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), a traditionalist Muslim organisation that had previously been led by Gus Dur, as the president is usually called. Although the NU's membership is estimated at more than 30 million, the PKB's support is drawn mainly from the rural parts of Java, especially East Java, where it was the leading party in the general election. Gus Dur's election as president occurred in somewhat fortuitous circumstances. The front-runner in the presidential race was Megawati Soekarnoputri, whose secular- nationalist Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) won 34 per cent of the votes in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • A REAL THREAT from WITHIN: Muhammadiyah's Identity
    Suaidi Asyari A REAL THREAT FROM WITHIN: Muhammadiyah’s Identity Metamorphosis and the Dilemma of Democracy Suaidi Asyari IAIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin - Jambi Abstract: This paper will look at Muhammadiyah as a constantly metamorphosing organism from which have grown modernist-reformist, liberalist progressive, political pragmatist and potentially violent fundamentalist-radical Muslims. It will argue that the trajectory passed by and the victory of the radical-puritan element in the National Congress 2005 can potentially become an obstacle for Muhammadiyah's involvement in the process of implementing democratic values in Indonesia in the future. To keep watching Muhammadiyah’s trajectory is crucially important due to the fact that this organization is one of the powerful forces in the world toward the democratization process. In order to be on the right track of democracy, Muhammadiyah has to be able to cope with its internal disputes over democratic values. Only by means of coping with these internal disputes can this organization ensure its role in propagating and disseminating democratic ideas as well as practices in Indonesia. Keywords: Muhammadiyah, metamorphoses, identity, democracy Introduction: An Overview of Muhammadiyah To date, Muhammadiyah has been plausibly assumed to be a moderate Islamic organization which is in a similar position to Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and does not have any connections with radical individuals or organizations that could be associated with radical Islamic ideology. This paper will I argue that there are some important 18 JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Volume 01, Number 01, June 2007 Muhammadiyah and the Dilemma of Democracy factors that have been overlooked or ignored in this understanding of Muhammadiyah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Islamic Religious-Political
    Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi THE RISE OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS-POLITICAL MOVEMENTS IN INDONESIA The Background, Present Situation and Future1 Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi The Institute for Islamic Studies of Darussalam, Gontor Ponorogo, Indonesia Abstract: This paper traces the roots of the emergence of Islamic religious and political movements in Indonesia especially during and after their depoliticization during the New Order regime. There were two important impacts of the depoliticization, first, the emergence of various study groups and student organizations in university campuses. Second, the emergence of Islamic political parties after the fall of Suharto. In addition, political freedom after long oppression also helped create religious groups both radical on the one hand and liberal on the other. These radical and liberal groups were not only intellectual movements but also social and political in nature. Although the present confrontation between liberal and moderate Muslims could lead to serious conflict in the future, and would put the democratic atmosphere at risk, the role of the majority of the moderates remains decisive in determining the course of Islam and politics in Indonesia. Keywords: Islamic religious-political movement, liberal Islam, non-liberal Indonesian Muslims. Introduction The rise of Islamic political parties and Islamic religious movements after the fall of Suharto was not abrupt in manner. The process was gradual, involving numbers of national and global factors. 1 The earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference “Islam and Asia: Revisiting the Socio-Political Dimension of Islam,” jointly organized by Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) and Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia (IKIM), 15-16 October, Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Indonesia' S Historic First Presidential Elections
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España SEBASTIAN, LEONARD C. Indonesia' s historic first presidential elections UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 6, octubre, 2004, pp. 1-8 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76711307006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI DISCUSSION PAPERS Octubre de 2004 INDONESIA’S HISTORIC FIRST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AUTHOR1: LEONARD C. SEBASTIAN 2 Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS), Singapore DATE: October 2004 September 20 marked the end of a momentous year for Indonesian politics concluding a third leg of a series of elections with an array of electoral formats which began in April ranging from an open list proportional system for the House of People’s Representatives and the House of Regional People’s Representatives; a single non-transferable vote system for new Regional Representatives Council and culminating with two round majoritarian system for the presidential election. Being the third largest democracy after the USA and India, Indonesia’s election mechanism is complex and required significant voter education initiatives to socialize the new election format. The general elections held on 5 April was for a fully elected House of People’s Representatives (DPR, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat), the House of Regional People’s Representatives (DPRD, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah) or the regional assemblies at the provincial and district level and the new Regional Representatives Council (DPD, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah).
    [Show full text]
  • Idss Commentaries
    IDSS COMMENTARIES (26/2004) IDSS Commentaries are intended to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy relevant background and analysis of contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of IDSS. ___________________________________________________________________________ The Paradox of Indonesia’s “Post-Majapahit” Presidency: Historic Direct Election Makes Yudhoyono Most Popular Leader with possibly the Weakest Government since Suharto’s fall Yang Razali Kassim * 12th July 2004 Goenawan Mohamad, the veteran writer, describes the July 5 direct presidential election as a historic turning point ushering Indonesia into the “post-Majapahit” era. Never before since the time of the old Javanese kingdom have the people had the freedom to choose their own ruler. This is also the first time since the birth of the Indonesian nation state that they can elect their own “king” - without intermediaries or “people’s representatives” acting on their behalf. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, as widely predicted by various polls, is emerging as the most popular choice, with Yusuf Kalla as his vice-president. The emergence of Susilo – “SBY” as he is widely known – at the expense of incumbent Megawati Sukarnoputri is the consequence of a “deficiency fatigue”: Tired of weak government, the people clamoured for change and rejuvenation and swung behind the candidate who to them came like a gush of fresh air. The result – a significant lead of 33.8% of the votes counted so far for SBY, cutting across ideological, ethnic and religious affiliations, according to an exit poll released two days after the election by the local research body, LP3ES, and the United States-based National Democratic Institute (NDI).
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Decline in Indonesia: the Role of Religious Authorities Saskia Schäfer
    Democratic Decline in Indonesia: The Role of Religious Authorities Saskia Schäfer Abstract The Council of Indonesian Islamic Scholars (MUI) has exerted increased political influence in Indonesian politics since the fall of Suharto. Constituted by representatives from various Muslim civil society organizations, the council was originally intended by Suharto to serve as a political representative for Indonesia’s two largest civil society organizations, the Muhammadiyah and the Nahdlatul Ulama. This article argues that in addition to its own non-democratic structures and its fatwas opposing democratic values, the MUI has contributed to Indonesia’s democratic stagnation and decline in two ways: by undermining the authority of elected state representatives through its anti-pluralist stance and its epistocratic claims, and by imperiling the fragile but functioning balance of religion and the state through its undermining of long-established religious civil society organizations. Keywords: Islam, democracy, religious authorities, Indonesia, authoritarianization DOI: 10.5509/2019922235 Introduction wenty years after the fall of the military dictator Suharto in 1998, Indonesia has not fallen into the hands of Islamist extremists via Telections, nor did the country’s oligarchs succeed in passing the presidency from one former military officer (Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono) to another (Prabowo Subianto) in the 2014 election. The former furniture entrepreneur Joko Widodo, called Jokowi, who became Indonesia’s first ____________________ Saskia Schäfer works on politics and religion in Southeast Asia at Humboldt University of Berlin. Email: [email protected]. Acknowledgements: Earlier versions of this article were presented at the workshop “Conceptualizing the Bureaucratization of Islam and its Socio-Legal Dimensions in Southeast Asia” at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle in September 2017 and at the workshop “Post-Democratizing Politics in East Asia” at the National University of Singapore in March 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Culture and Muslim Political Participation in Post-Suharto Indonesia
    RELIGIOUS DEMOCRATS: DEMOCRATIC CULTURE AND MUSLIM POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN POST-SUHARTO INDONESIA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science at The Ohio State University by Saiful Mujani, MA ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor R. William Liddle, Adviser Professor Bradley M. Richardson Professor Goldie Shabad ___________________________ Adviser Department of Political Science ABSTRACT Most theories about the negative relationship between Islam and democracy rely on an interpretation of the Islamic political tradition. More positive accounts are also anchored in the same tradition, interpreted in a different way. While some scholarship relies on more empirical observation and analysis, there is no single work which systematically demonstrates the relationship between Islam and democracy. This study is an attempt to fill this gap by defining Islam empirically in terms of several components and democracy in terms of the components of democratic culture— social capital, political tolerance, political engagement, political trust, and support for the democratic system—and political participation. The theories which assert that Islam is inimical to democracy are tested by examining the extent to which the Islamic and democratic components are negatively associated. Indonesia was selected for this research as it is the most populous Muslim country in the world, with considerable variation among Muslims in belief and practice. Two national mass surveys were conducted in 2001 and 2002. This study found that Islam defined by two sets of rituals, the networks of Islamic civic engagement, Islamic social identity, and Islamist political orientations (Islamism) does not have a negative association with the components of democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Konsep Islamic State Amien Rais Dan Nurcholish Madjid
    KONSEP ISLAMIC STATE AMIEN RAIS DAN NURCHOLISH MADJID Andri Nirwana AN Fakultas Ushuluddin IAIN Ar Raniry Kopelma Darussalam Kota Banda Aceh Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the study of Islamic Political Thought of Nurcholish Madjid and M. Amien Rais about Islamic state in Indonesia. Nurcholish Madjid required secularization, as an effort and rationalization of religious desecration. In this context, religion is not only understood as an integral dimension of the sacred (holy) with all its appliances. But there are many parts changed, because it is sociological. According to Nurcholish, secularization is the way that Muslims needed to be done, so that the public can distinguish between social phenomena and the phenomenon of transcendent revelation. Kata Kunci: Islamic state, Amien Rais, Nurcholish Madjid Pendahuluan Dalam pandangan Amien Rais, istilah Islamic State atau Negara Islam tidak ada dalam al-Quran maupun dalam Sunnah. Oleh karena itu, menurut Amien Rais, tidak ada perintah dalam Islam untuk menegakkan Negara Islam. Yang ada adalah khilafah, yaitu suatu misi kaum Muslimin yang harus ditegakkan di muka bumi ini untuk memakmurkan sesuai dengan petunjuk dan peraturan Allah swt., maupun Rasul-Nya. Adapun cara pelaksanaannya, lanjut Amien Rais, al-Quran tidak menunjukkan secara terperinci, tetapi dalam bentuk global saja. Amien mencontohkan Saudi Arabia, sebagai suatu negara yang aneh dalam zaman modern ini, dan para pemimpinnya menyatakan tidak perlu konstitusi karena mereka sudah mempunyai sandaran syari’ah Islam. Namun, bagi Amien aplikasi syari’ah Islam sendiri di sana begitu sempit, dan jauh dari idealisme Islam itu sendiri. Amien menyebutkan, seperti prinsip-prinsip monarkhi Saudi Arabia itu sendiri sudah bertabrakan dengan prinsip-prinsip ajaran Islam di bidang kemasyarakatan dan politik.
    [Show full text]
  • Constrained Hegemony: the State and Islamic Politics in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia
    Constrained Hegemony: The State and Islamic Politics in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia Muhammad Ridha1 Abstract This paper aims to elucidate the unevenness of Islamic politics influence within the state: why has the aspiration of post-authoritarian Islamic politics in Indonesia gained influence in the democratic process despite the disappointing performance of the Islamic political parties? It argues that Islamic politics is experiencing what I call “constrained hegemony.” It suggests that the current paradoxical situation of Islamic politics is the result of the failure of Islamic politics to politically dominate the state along with the resurgence of Islamic conservatism in post- authoritarian Indonesia. Both the failure and the resurgence are determined by two intertwined factors: the legacy of the New Order power structure and the adoption of a neoliberal free- market economy. The factors operate in different ways at the political and civil society levels of the state. At the level of political society, the legacy of the New Order power structure and neoliberalism tends to weaken and subordinate Islamic forces that are organized through political parties. At the civil society level, the legacy of the New Order power structure and neoliberalism leads to the reinforcement of Islamic forces that is regimented through conservative Islamic organizations. Introduction This project aims to examine the unevenness of Islamic politics influence within the state: why has the aspiration of Islamic politics been able to gain influence in the democratic process of the state despite the disappointing performance of the Islamic political parties? Hamayotsu (2011) finds that the Islamic political agenda promoted by Islamic parties has failed to gain significant votes in the national electoral arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldview) Seorang Muslim 3
    Logo RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER (RPS) PROGRAM STUDI S1 ……………………………. PTM FAKULTAS …………………………………………….. UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PROF. DR. HAMKA MATA KULIAH KODE Rumpun MK BOBOT (sks) SEMESTER Direvisi Pendidikan Agama Islam 02 Agama Islam T=2 P=0 1 Mata Kuliah Kompetensi Inti Pengembang RPS Koordinator RMK Ka PRODI LPP-AIKA LP-AIK CapaianPembelajaran(CP) Program Seluruh Prodi Studi Sikap : 1. Mampu menumbuhkan ketaqwaan kepada Tuhan Yang maha Esa melalui kajian kebutuhan manusia terhadap agama 2. Mampu menanamkan keyakinan bahwa tauhid merupakan inti ajaran Islam dan pandangan hidup (worldview) seorang muslim 3. Mampu mengaktualisasikan keimanan dalam kehidupan sosial 4. Mampu membangun rasa bangga dan percaya diri sebagai seorang muslim 5. Mampu menghargai ragam budaya dan agama sebagai manifestasi sikap seorang muslim yang toleran Pengetahuan : 1. Mampu memahami prinsip universal ajaran Islam yang dinamis dan berkemajuan Keterampilan : 1. Mampu membuat perencanaan model implementasi ajaran Islam dalam kehidupan Diskripsi Singkat MK Mata kuliah Pendidikan Agama bertujuan untuk membekali mahasiswa (muslim) agar menjadi seorang muslim yang memahami dan menyadari arti pentingnya agama Islam sebagai pedoman hidup, punya kepercayaan diri yang kuat serta bangga terhadap Islam, moderat, toleran, dan modernis serta mampu menjabarkan komitmen pelaksanannya dalam bentuk perencanaan sistematik Pustaka Utama : 1. Dr. H. Afifi Fauzi Abbas, MA., (2015) Faham Agama dalam Muhammadiyah, UHAMKA PERSS, Jakarta 2. Alpha Amirrachman, dkk (ed.) (2015), Islam Berkemajuan untuk Peradaban Dunia, Mizan, Bandung 3. Karen Armastrong, (2001), Sejarah Tuhan, Mizan, bandung 4. Muhammad Qurhub, (2005), Barat Menggugat, Islam Menjawab, Bina Mitra Perss, Depok 5. Adian Husaini, 10 Kuliah Agama Islam, (2016), Pro-U Media, Yogyakarta. 6. Abu Hanifah, (1989), Perlunya mansia Beragama, Darul Qalam, Garut 7.
    [Show full text]
  • National Political Evolution Over the Next Five to Ten Years
    CRM D0006866.A1/Final September 2002 Indonesia's Political Evolution Over the Next 5-10 years Richard W. Baker 4825 Mark Center Drive • Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1850 Project Asia is The CNA Corporation’s focal point for Asian security studies. This ongoing project’s work is contained in several types of products, including: regional assessments, country profiles, occasional papers, monographs, and conferences on important security topics. Project Asia’s overall analytic approach seeks to synthesize the work of CNAC researchers, policy analysts, regional experts, and other sources of information with what is being said and written in the region; thus, it can provide the context necessary for policy makers to make decisions relevant to the region. Although the focus is on practical near-term issues, longer-term trends are not neglected. Project Asia falls under the Center for Strategic Studies of The CNA Corporation (CNAC). The Center for Strategic Studies combines in one organizational entity regional analyses, studies of political-military issues, and strategic and force assessment work. Such a center allows CNAC to join the global community of centers for strategic studies, and share perspectives on major security issues that affect nations.There is a continuing need for analytic and assessment work that goes beyond conventional wisdom. The Center for Strategic Studies is dedicated to providing a deeper level of expertise, and work that considers a full range of plausible possibilities, anticipates a range of outcomes, and does not
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian Elections
    Order Code RS21874 June 29, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Indonesian Elections Bruce Vaughn Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary On April 5, 2004, Indonesia successfully completed the first step of a multi-phase election process for 2004. The first phase elected the national legislature and the new regional representative council. The second phase, to be held on July 5, 2004, will seek to elect a President. There will be a run-off election on September 20, 2004, if no single candidate wins a majority in July. The April election was judged to be free and fair by most observers. This bodes well for evolution of democracy in Indonesia. Nationalist and secular parties were the most popular with voters. The Islamist parties limited appeal can be attributed more to their anti-corruption and good governance policies than to an overtly Islamist agenda. This report will be updated as events warrant. April Parliamentary Elections The Indonesian General Election Commission (KPU) registered 147 million Indonesians to take part in the April 5, 2004 poll in which 7,800 candidates from 24 political parties ran for 550 seats in the national legislature (DPRD).1 One hundred and twenty eight individuals were also elected to the new Regional Representative Council (DPD). Analysis of the election attributed the decline in support for President Megawati’s Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), as compared with the 1999 parliamentary elections, to the lack of economic growth, Megawati’s governing style, and continuing government corruption.2 The vote was generally peaceful with the exception of limited fighting between Free Aceh Movement (GAM) forces and the Indonesian National Defense Forces in the region of Nanggoroe, Aceh Darussalam.3 (See table below for election results.) 1 Shoeb Kagda, “Indonesians Cast Votes,” The Business Times, April 6, 2004.
    [Show full text]