2015 Regional Transportation Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Official List of Public Waters
Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area). -
Regional Transportation Improvement Program 2019-2028
Regional Transportation Improvement Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2028 UPDATED: July 2017 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Ten Year Plan Update Process ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Transportation Planners Collaborative Threshold Criteria ............................................................................................................ 4 Scoring Criteria, Weighting, and Supporting Data .................................................................................................................................................. 5 NCC TYP Scoring Strategy ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 New TYP Projects Description, Scope and Budget .................................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Tables for All Projects .......................................................................................................................................................................................... -
NHDOT Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting
BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE REPORT SUBJECT: NHDOT Monthly Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting DATE OF CONFERENCE: August 17, 2016 LOCATION OF CONFERENCE: John O. Morton Building ATTENDED BY: NHDOT Army Corps of Engineers NH Fish & Game Matt Urban Michael Hicks Carol Henderson Sarah Large Heidi Holman Ron Crickard EPA NHB/DRED Tony Weatherbee Mark Kern Amy Lamb Marc Laurin Chris Carucco FHWA Consultants/Public Trent Zanes Jamie Sikora Participants Mike Dugas Mark Hasselmann Peter Pitsas Kirk Mudgett Allison Reese Victoria Chase NHDES Peter Walker Jennifer Reczek Gino Infascelli Christine Perron Gerry Bedard Lori Sommer Rebecca Martin PRESENTATIONS/ PROJECTS REVIEWED THIS MONTH: (minutes on subsequent pages) th Finalization of June 15 2016 Meeting Minutes ................................................................................ 2 Conway, 40018 Main Street Infrastructure Improvements (Non-Federal) ......................................... 2 Dixville, 41077 (Bridge #182/070) (Non-Federal)............................................................................. 3 Manchester, 16099 (I-293 Exit 6 & 7) (Non-Federal) ........................................................................ 4 Loudon-Canterbury 29613 (X-A004(201)) ........................................................................................ 7 Ossipee, 10431 (X-MGS_NHS_X_T-0271(032)) .............................................................................. 9 Manchester/ Bedford Mitigation Wildlife Habitat .......................................................................... -
FF Oo Ll Ll Oo Ww Uu Ss
VOLUME 38, NUMBER 4 JUNE 27, 2013 FREE THE WEEKLY NEWS & LIFESTYLE JOURNAL OF MT. WASHINGTON VALLEY Great Glen Trails Follllow us...... Guided Tours Daily Avoid the Crowds! www.greatglentrails.com (603) 466-2333 Drive your own car Guided Tours Outfitters Shop Glen View Café Rt. 16, Pinkham Notch www.mtwashingtonautoroad.com A SALMON PRESS PUBLICATION • (603) 447-6336 • PUBLISHED IN CONWAY, NH (603) 466-3988 Valley Feature Ham Radio operators light up when the power is down By Rachael Brown many stations on any and all ateur Station at the Town of amateur bands to learn to op- Conway EOC. Herm Weber, Ham radio operators do erate in abnormal situations, in liaison to N.H. Homeland anything but clown around. less than stellar situations, he Security Emergency Man- You see, the amateur radio op- adds. agement in Concord and Art erators provide a highly skilled “Our club’s first Field Day Smith KB1TX, digital liaison and professional service to the was 2007 at Mud Football Sta- to N.H. ARES. community. When the lights dium. We were there for two Activation is though a go out or the entire electri- years, and then moved to Tin call tree, on air activation or cal grid is down because of an Mountain,” says Fitch, adding self-activation, Quigley says. emergency or disaster, com- the club restarted in December When an emergency or di- munications are provided by a 2005. The operators show the saster happens we receive a dedicated group of volunteers public how they communicate call, e-mail- if those modes are known as Ham Radio Opera- when commercial power is out. -
Guide to NH Timber Harvesting Laws
Guide to New Hampshire Timber Harvesting Laws ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication is an updated and revised edition prepared by: Sarah Smith, Extension Professor/Specialist, Forest Industry, UNH Cooperative Extension Debra Anderson, Administrative Assistant, UNH Cooperative Extension We wish to thank the following for their review of this publication: Dennis Thorell, NH Department of Revenue Administration JB Cullen, NH Division of Forests and Lands Karen P. Bennett, UNH Cooperative Extension Bryan Nowell, NH Division of Forests and Lands Hunter Carbee, NH Timberland Owners Association, NH Timber Harvesting Council Sandy Crystal, Vanessa Burns, and Linda Magoon, NH Dept. of Environmental Services University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, Nesmith Hall Durham, New Hampshire 03824 http://ceinfo.unh.edu NH Division of Forests and Lands PO Box 1856, 172 Pembroke Rd. Concord, NH 03302-1856 http://www.dred.state.nh.us/forlands New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association 54 Portsmouth Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301 www.nhtoa.org UNH Cooperative Extension programs and policies are consistent with pertinent Federal and State laws and regulations on non-discrimination regarding race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, handicap or veteran’s status. College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, County Governments, NH Department of Resources and Economic Development, NH Fish and Game, USDA and US Fish and Wildlife Service cooperating. Funding was provided by: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Economic Action Program Cover photo: Claude Marquis, Kel-Log Inc., works on the ice-damaged Gorham Town Forest August 2004 Table of Contents New Hampshire’s Working Forest ......................................................................................2 Introduction to Forestry Laws ............................................................................................4 Current Use Law ................................................................................................................. -
Regional Transportation Improvement Program (Rtip)
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) STATE FISCAL YEARS 2021-2030 APRIL 2019 This page left intentionally blank. North Country Council Regional Planning Commission FY 2021-2030 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) The FY 2021-2030 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) was developed by North Country Council with guidance from the Council’s Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). The TAC voted to support the FY 2021-2030 RTIP on 4/11/2019. The final FY 2021-2030 RTIP was approved by the North Country Council Commissioners on 4/18/2019. The preparation of this plan has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this plan do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This page left intentionally blank. CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Overview: North Country Council Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) .......................................................................................... 7 Overview: NH DOT Ten Year Plan (TYP) ......................................................................................................................................................................... -
Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program 2013-2016
NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program 2013-2016 Surface Transportation Projects in the Nashua Metropolitan Planning Area through Amendment 2 Nashua Regional Planning Commission ADOPTED October 17, 2012 9 Executive Park Drive Suite 201 AMENDMENT #1 APPROVED March 20, 2013 Merrimack, NH 03054 (603) 424-2240 AMENDMENT #2 APPROVED June 19, 2013 www.nashuarpc.org Amended 2013 - 2016 Transportation Improvement Program Projects updated through June 19, 2013 Surface Transportation Projects in the Nashua Metropolitan Planning Area Page 1 of 8 BOSTON EXPRESS NASHUA Project Overall Reg CAA ID Project Cost Sig Status Route/Road: FE Everett Turnpike 68060 $131,000 No E-21 Scope: Manchester - Nashua (FE Everett Turnpike) Operating Subsidy Phase FY Federal $ NH DOT $ Other $ Total $ Funding Source T 2013 $ 104,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 104,000 FTA Section 5307 Urban Transit Operating T 2014 $ 27,864 $ 0 $ 0 $ 27,864 FTA Section 5307 Urban Transit Operating Total TIP $: $ 131,864 $ 0 $ 0 $ 131,864 BROOKLINE Project Overall Reg CAA ID Project Cost Sig Status Route/Road: NH 130 20830 $466,000 No E-33 Scope: Construct sidewalks in two locations Phase FY Federal $ NH DOT $ Other $ Total $ Funding Source P 2012 $ 63,200 $ 0 $ 15,800 $ 79,000 STP - Transportation Enhancement P 2013 $ 800 $ 0 $ 200 $ 1,000 STP - Transportation Enhancement R 2012 $ 8,000 $ 0 $ 2,000 $ 10,000 STP - Transportation Enhancement R 2013 $ 16,000 $ 0 $ 4,000 $ 20,000 STP - Transportation Enhancement C 2013 $ 285,600 $ 0 $ 71,400 -
Connecticut River Bridge Replacement Project
CONNECTICUT RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Environmental Assessment & Section 4(f) Evaluation MAY 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................S-1 1: Purpose and Need................................................................................................................. 1-1 A. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1-1 B. Project Description.......................................................................................................... 1-1 C. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................... 1-1 Regional Passenger Rail System........................................................................................ 1-1 Bridge History.................................................................................................................... 1-2 Current Bridge Operations ................................................................................................. 1-2 Navigation Along the Connecticut River ........................................................................... 1-3 D. Problem Identification and Need..................................................................................... 1-4 Bridge Structure ................................................................................................................. 1-4 -
0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom. -
White Mountain National Forest Eastern Region Forest Service United Statesdepartm Chase Environmental Assessment
Chase Hill Project Environmental Assessment Town of Albany Carroll County, NH Prepared by Saco Ranger District December 2007 United States Department of Agriculture For Information Contact: Forest Service Bob Heiar Eastern Region [email protected] 603 447-5448 X 125 Or Mike Maguire [email protected] 603 447-5448 X 126 33 Kancamagus Hwy Conway, NH 03818 White Mountain National Forest Fax: 603 447-8405 This document is available in large print. Contact the Saco Ranger District 1-603-447-2166 TTY 1-603-447-3121 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political affiliation, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status (not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication or program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA's TARGET Center at 202/720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write the USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, Washington, DC, 20250-9410 or call 202/720-5964 (voice or TDD). The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on Recycled Paper Chase Hill Project-Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need for Action 1.1 Project Area and Background 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action 1.3 Proposed Action 1.4 Context and Scope of the Project 1.5 Tiering -
Natural Resources 1
CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 5 NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Introduction Conway enjoys an abundance of environmental features and natural resources which contributes to the high quality of life associated with the town. Arguably the prime attraction for year-round and seasonal residents, as well as tourists visiting Conway, is the abundance and access to the varied natural environment. Despite having urbanized nodes contained within the villages, as well as the Route 16 highway corridor (also known as “the strip”), much of the town’s landscape can be classified as rural in character. Planning based on natural features is motivated by the desire to conserve and protect important areas, but also by the belief that development of any kind can best be located, with less present expense and future problems, if based on an understanding of natural constraints. This chapter of the master plan examines natural features located in the town of Conway. Inventory and analysis is provided for water resources, hazardous materials and contaminated sites, floodplains, soils, wetlands, protected and conservation lands, and forest resources. In order to provide data and information for this chapter, three principle methods were used. The first consisted of an analysis of existing sources of natural resource literature pertaining to Conway and/or the Mount Washington Valley region. Two primary sources of information used for this analysis included Scoping Report: New Hampshire Route 16 and U.S. Route 302[1] and Conway Natural Resources Inventory[2]. These studies represented the most current inventories of natural resources in Conway completed since 1990. The second method consisted of natural resources map layers provided by the University of New Hampshire Complex Systems Research Center, the Town of Conway, the U.S. -
Connecticut River Bridges, Rev
NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES State of New Hampshire, Department of Cultural Resources 603-271-3483 19 Pillsbury Street, 2 nd floor, Concord NH 03301-3570 603-271-3558 Voice/ TDD ACCESS: RELAY NH 1-800-735-2964 FAX 603-271-3433 http://www.nh.gov/nhdhr [email protected] Garvin--Connecticut River Bridges, Rev. 7/2009 LIST OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES ON THE CONNECTICUT RIVER BETWEEN VERMONT AND NEW HAMPSHIRE BY 1906, WITH NOTES ON LATER SPANS The basic information in this list was obtained from Report of the Bridge Commissioners of the State of New Hampshire to the Legislature, Dec. 31, 1906 (Manchester, N.H.: John B. Clarke Company, 1906) Existing bridges are identified by New Hampshire Department of Transportation bridge coordinates, as “042/044.” [Bridges described in italics had disappeared by 1906.] 1. Hinsdale to Brattleboro, Vermont. The first bridge was built in 1804 by the Hinsdale Bridge and Sixth New Hampshire Turnpike Corporation, chartered in 1802. Frederick J. Wood in his The Turnpikes of New England (1919) says that this company “appears to have been primarily a toll-bridge corporation, although it had authority to build about ten miles of turnpike through Hinsdale and Winchester to connect with a branch of the Fifth Massachusetts [Turnpike] which was built to the state line prior to 1806.” The Hinsdale Bridge was apparently replaced several times. Hinsdale, New Hampshire (Hinsdale, N.H.: Bicentennial Committee [1976]) says that bridges here have “been carried away, by floods and ice, on the average of once in every ten years.” The corporate name was shortened to “Hinsdale Bridge Corporation” in 1853, probably reflecting the relinquishment of any turnpike road the corporation had built.