Front Matter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Front Matter Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information COMMERCIAL REMEDIES: RESOLVING CONTROVERSIES The law of commercial remedies gives rise to a number of important doctrinal, theoretical and practical controversies which deserve sustained and rigorous examination. This volume explores such controversies and suggests solutions directed at ensuring that the law is defensible, clear and just. With contributions from twenty-three leading academic and practitioner experts, this book addresses significant issues in the law which, taken together, range across the entire remedial jurisdiction as it applies to commercial disputes. The book focuses primarily on the resolution of controversies in the English law of commercial remedies, but recent developments elsewhere are also considered, especially in other common law jurisdictions. The result is a remarkably comprehensive coverage of the field which will be of relevance to academics, students, judges and practitioners. The aim has been to deal with the law as at 1 November 2016. The chapters in this volume are the product of a conference held in Cambridge under the auspices of the Cambridge Private Law Centre, co-directed by Graham Virgo and Sarah Worthington. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information COMMERCIAL REMEDIES: RESOLVING CONTROVERSIES Edited by GRAHAM VIRGO QC (HON) University of Cambridge SARAH WORTHINGTON QC (HON), FBA University of Cambridge © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia 4843/24, 2nd Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi – 110002, India 79 Anson Road, #06–04/06, Singapore 079906 Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107171329 DOI: 10.1017/9781316759905 © Cambridge University Press 2017 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2017 Printed in the United Kingdom by Clays, St Ives plc A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Virgo, Graham, editor. | Worthington, Sarah, editor Title: Commercial remedies : resolving controversies / edited by Graham Virgo, Sarah Worthington. Description: Cambridge [UK] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2017. Identifiers: LCCN 2017003192 | ISBN 9781107171329 (hardback) Subjects: LCSH: Commercial law – England. | Remedies (Law) – England. | BISAC: LAW / Corporate. Classification: LCC KD1629 .C667 2017 | DDC 346.4207–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017003192 ISBN 978-1-107-17132-9 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information CONTENTS List of Contributors page viii Acknowledgements x Table of Cases xi PART I. Introduction 1 1 Commercial Remedies: Identifying Themes and Controversies 3 graham virgo and sarah worthington 2 On the Nature and Function of Remedies for Breach of Contract 23 jonathan morgan PART II. Specific Remedies 49 3 Repudiation: Keeping the Contract Alive 51 janet o’sullivan 4 Termination and the Agreed Sum 75 andrew summers 5 Specific Performance and Change of Mind 98 mindy chen-wishart 6 Injunctions in Tort and Contract 127 paul s davies 7 Rescission 151 nicholas j mcbride 8 Remedies for Vindicating Ownership Rights in Real Property 173 amy goymour v © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information vi contents PART III. Monetary Remedies 203 9 Performance Damages 205 charlie webb 10 Proving Contract Damages 228 adam kramer 11 Interest 247 andrew burrows 12 Actionable Loss of a Chance 272 sarah green 13 Gain-based Remedies 292 graham virgo 14 Exemplary Damages 318 james goudkamp PART IV. Agreed and Party-Specific Remedies 341 15 Express Termination Clauses 343 richard hooley 16 Penalty Clauses 366 sarah worthington 17 Deposit Clauses 390 carmine conte 18 Flawed Assets Clauses 414 louise gullifer 19 Subrogation 437 stephen watterson 20 Equitable Set-off 465 pg turner PART V. Special Contexts 489 21 Commercial Remedies in International Cases 491 louise merrett © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information contents vii 22 Remedies of the Criminal Courts 515 matthew dyson and paul jarvis PART VI. The Future 543 23 Codification of Remedies for Breach of Commercial Contracts: A Blueprint 545 neil andrews Index 568 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information CONTRIBUTORS neil andrews is Professor of Civil Justice and Private Law at the University of Cambridge andrew burrows qc is Professor of the Law of England at the University of Oxford mindy chen-wishart is Professor of the Law of Contract at the University of Oxford carmine conte is formerly a Fellow at Homerton College, Cambridge paul s davies is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oxford matthew dyson is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oxford james goudkamp is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oxford amy goymour is University Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge sarah green is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oxford louise gullifer is Professor of Commercial Law at the University of Oxford richard hooley is University Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge viii © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information list of contributors ix paul jarvis is a Barrister at 6 King’s Bench Walk, London adam kramer is a Barrister at 3 Verulam Buildings, London nicholas j mcbride is College Lecturer in Law at Pembroke College, Cambridge louise merrett is Reader in International Commercial Law at the University of Cambridge jonathan morgan is University Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge janet o’sullivan is University Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge andrew summers is Associate Professor of Law at the London School of Economics pgturneris University Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge graham virgo qc is Professor of English Private Law at the University of Cambridge stephen watterson is University Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge charlie webb is Lecturer in Law at the London School of Economics sarah worthington qc is Downing Professor of the Laws of England at the University of Cambridge © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The editors wish to note their gratitude for the financial support and encouragement from Clifford Chance, which funded the symposium on commercial remedies in July 2015. We also wish to thank Christopher Jenkins, Rachel Leow and Liron Shmilovits for their editorial assistance in the preparation of this volume. x © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17132-9 — Commercial Remedies: Resolving Controversies Edited by Graham Virgo , Sarah Worthington Frontmatter More Information TABLE OF CASES A v Bottrill [2002] UKPC 44, [2003] 1 AC 449, 555 Abbey Developments Ltd v PP Brickwork Ltd [2003] EWHC 1987 (TCC), 362–363 Abdel Hadi Abdallah Al Qahtani & Sons Beverage Industry Co v Antliff [2010] EWHC 1735 (Comm), 506–507 Abu Dhabi National Tanker Co v Product Star Shipping Ltd (The Product Star) (No 2) [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 397, 72–73 AB v CD [2014] EWCA Civ 229, [2015] 1 WLR 771, 43, 149–150 AB v South West Water Services Ltd [1993] QB 507 (CA), 318 Acer Investment
Recommended publications
  • Complete V.9 No.1
    Journal of Civil Law Studies Volume 9 Number 1 Conference Papers The Louisiana Civil Code Translation Project: Enhancing Visibility and Promoting the Civil Law in English Article 16 Baton Rouge, April 10 and 11, 2014 Part 1. Translation Theory and Louisiana Perspectives 10-27-2016 Complete V.9 No.1 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls Part of the Civil Law Commons Repository Citation Complete V.9 No.1, 9 J. Civ. L. Stud. (2016) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls/vol9/iss1/16 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Law Studies by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume 9 Number 1 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLES . The Constitution as Code (with a Postcript by Nicholas Kasirer) ................................ Paul R. Baier . The Duty of Good Faith Taken to a New Level: An Analysis of Disloyal Behavior ..................................................................... Thiago Luis Sombra . International Trade v. Intellectual Property Lawyers: Globalization and the Brazilian Legal Profession ............................................... Vitor Martins Dias CONFERENCE PAPERS The Louisiana Civil Code Translation Project: Enhancing Visibility and Promoting the Civil Law in English Le projet de traduction du Code civil louisianais : Améliorer la visibilité et la promotion du droit civil en anglais Louisiana State University, Paul M. Hébert Law Center, April 10–11, 2014 . Papers by Vivian Grosswald Curran, Jean-Claude Gémar, François-Xavier Licari, Sylvie Monjean-Decaudin, Olivier Moréteau, Alexandru-Daniel On, Agustín Parise, and Anne Wagner CIVIL LAW IN THE WORLD .
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Appeal for Ontario Book of Authorities of C & K
    Court of Appeal File No. C68751 Court File No. CV-20-00643021-00CL COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 243(1) OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. B-3, AS AMENDED, SECTION 101 OF THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT, R.S.O. 1990 C. C.43, AS AMENDED AND SECTION 68 OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACT, R.S.O. 1990, C. 30 B E T W E E N: C & K MORTGAGE SERVICES INC. Applicant (Respondent in Appeal) - and - CAMILLA COURT HOMES INC. and ELITE HOMES INC. Respondents BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF C & K MORTGAGE SERVICES INC. November 27, 2020 DICKINSON WRIGHT LLP Barristers & Solicitors 199 Bay Street Suite 2200, P.O. Box 447 Commerce Court Postal Station Toronto, Ontario, M5L 1G4 DAVID P. PREGER (36870L) Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-646-4606 DAVID Z. SEIFER (77474F) Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-646-6867 Fax: 844-670-6009 Lawyers for the Respondent, C & K Mortgage Services Inc. 2 TO: STEVENSON WHELTON LLP Barristers 15 Toronto Street Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2E3 RICHARD MACKLIN Email: [email protected] Tel: 647-847-3822 YOLANDA SONG Email: [email protected] Tel: 647-245-2584 Fax: 416-599-7910 Lawyers for the Appellant, Yong Yeow (Jereemy) Tan AND TO: BLANEY MCMURTRY LLP Barristers & Solicitors 2 Queen Street East, Suite 1500 Toronto ON M5C 3G5 ERIC GOLDEN (416) 593-3927 (Tel) Email: [email protected] CHAD KOPACH (416) 593-2985 (Tel) Email: [email protected] (416) 593-5437 (Fax) Lawyers for the Receiver/Respondent, Rosen Goldberg Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Punitive Damages and Bhasin V Hrynew 2017 Canliidocs 336 Eric Andrews University of Western Ontario, Faculty of Law, [email protected]
    Western Journal of Legal Studies Volume 7 Article 1 Issue 2 Applying Legal Principles 2017 Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew 2017 CanLIIDocs 336 Eric Andrews University of Western Ontario, Faculty of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/uwojls Part of the Common Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Eric Andrews , "Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew", (2017) 7:2 online: UWO J Leg Stud 1 <http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/uwojls/vol7/iss2/1>. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Journal of Legal Studies by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew Abstract Punitive damages are a controversial remedy in Canadian and non-Canadian law. Some scholars have gone so far as to argue that punitive damages are entirely inconsistent with the goals and principles of private law and ought to be abolished. Notwithstanding these criticisms, the Supreme Court of Canada has treated punitive damages as a relatively uncontroversial private law remedy. However, the circumstances under which a court will consider awarding punitive damages have evolved with recent Supreme Court decisions. One example is the introduction of the independent actionable wrong requirement in Vorvis v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. The independent actionable wrong requirement has been criticized as an incoherent and ineffective check on the availability of punitive damages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty to Perform Commercial Contracts in Good Faith
    Tribunale Bologna 24.07.2007, n.7770 - ISSN 2239-7752 Direttore responsabile: Antonio Zama The duty to perform commercial contracts in good faith: a critical analysis of the recent developments and the impact on loan agreements Is the Traditional “Hostility” of English Law towards Good Faith “Misplaced”? 12 Settembre 2019 Luca Morrone Indice: 1. Is the Traditional “hostility” of english law towards good faith “misplaced”? 1.1 The traditional features of English contract law 1.2 The intentions of the parties in the rules of construction and interpretation 1.3 What should the correct approach to good faith be? Abstract Il presente scritto “Is the Traditional “Hostility” of English Law towards Good Faith “Misplaced”?” costituisce la prima di tre parti dell’elaborato “The Duty to Perform Commercial Contracts in Good Faith: a Critical Analysis of the Recent Developments and the Impact on Loan Agreements”, il quale analizza il dovere di agire secondo buona fede nei rapporti commerciali (il cosiddetto “duty of good faith”) e, in particolare, nei contratti di finanziamento disciplinati dal diritto inglese. Questa prima parte introduce il controverso tema della dottrina della buona fede nel diritto contrattuale inglese ripercorrendo e contestualizzando storicamente le sue origini, nonché analizzando il complesso rapporto fra la stessa e le fonti della contrattualistica. Al fine di valutare il ruolo che ha assunto e che l’autore ritiene debba assumere in futuro la buona fede contrattuale, vengono inoltre individuate le due principali dottrine giurisprudenziali dalle quali si considera che la natura giuridica della buona fede tragga la sua origine: le clausole implicite (le cosiddette “implied terms”) e i principi di interpretazione contrattuale (vale a dire i principi della cosiddetta “contractual interpretation”).
    [Show full text]
  • Punitive Damages and Bhasin V Hrynew Eric Andrews University of Western Ontario, Faculty of Law, [email protected]
    Western Journal of Legal Studies Volume 7 Article 1 Issue 2 Applying Legal Principles May 2017 Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew Eric Andrews University of Western Ontario, Faculty of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/uwojls Part of the Common Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Eric Andrews , "Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew", (2017) 7:2 online: UWO J Leg Stud 1 <https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/uwojls/vol7/iss2/1>. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Journal of Legal Studies by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew Abstract Punitive damages are a controversial remedy in Canadian and non-Canadian law. Some scholars have gone so far as to argue that punitive damages are entirely inconsistent with the goals and principles of private law and ought to be abolished. Notwithstanding these criticisms, the Supreme Court of Canada has treated punitive damages as a relatively uncontroversial private law remedy. However, the circumstances under which a court will consider awarding punitive damages have evolved with recent Supreme Court decisions. One example is the introduction of the independent actionable wrong requirement in Vorvis v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. The independent actionable wrong requirement has been criticized as an incoherent and ineffective check on the availability of punitive damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Bhasin V. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 S.C.R
    SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494 DATE: 20141113 DOCKET: 35380 BETWEEN: Harish Bhasin, carrying on business as Bhasin & Associates Appellant and Larry Hrynew and Heritage Education Funds Inc. (formerly known as Allianz Education Funds Inc., formerly known as Canadian American Financial Corp. (Canada) Limited) Respondents CORAM: McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: Cromwell J. (McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, (paras. 1 to 112) Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. concurring) BHASIN v. HRYNEW, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494 Harish Bhasin, carrying on business as Bhasin & Associates Appellant v. Larry Hrynew and Heritage Education Funds Inc. (formerly known as Allianz Education Funds Inc., formerly known as Canadian American Financial Corp. (Canada) Limited) Respondents Indexed as: Bhasin v. Hrynew 2014 SCC 71 File No.: 35380. 2014: February 12; 2014: November 13. Present: McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ALBERTA Contracts — Breach — Performance — Non-renewal provision — Duty of good faith — Duty of honest performance — Agreement governing relationship between company and retail dealer providing for automatic contract renewal at end of three-year term unless parties giving six months’ written notice to contrary — Company deciding not to renew dealership agreement — Retail dealer lost value of business and majority of sales agents solicited by competitor agency — Retail dealer suing company and competitor agency — Whether common law requiring new general duty of honesty in contractual performance — Whether company breaching that duty.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracts February 2020
    PLEASE NOTE: As an enhancement to the materials we have created, where possible, external web links to those cases and legislation that were available on the CanLII website. Please note, however, that not all links are reliable. The incorrect links appear to be especially problematic for the statutes, especially if the complete citation for the statute is not present at that exact spot in the materials. If you use the web links, please always double-check to ensure that you are being directed to the correct place. ------ The Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society has prepared these Bar Review Materials for the sole purpose of assisting applicants to prepare for the Nova Scotia Bar Examination. These materials are reviewed and updated annually, and published May 1 each year as study materials for the upcoming July and January exams. These current materials are the study outlines for the July 2020 and January 2021 Bar Examinations and may be relied upon for that sole purpose. The materials are not intended to provide legal advice, and should not be relied upon by articled clerks, transfer applicants, lawyers or members of the public as a current statement of the law. Members of the public who access these materials are urged to seek legal advice and are specifically warned against reliance on them in any legal matter or for pursuit of any legal remedy. The Society will not be liable for any use you made of these materials, beyond their intended purpose. CONTRACTS FEBRUARY 2020 CONTENTS: I. WHAT IS A CONTRACT? .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CONTRACTS ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bhasin V. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 (Canlii)
    Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 (CanLII) Date: 2014-11-13 Docket: 35380 Citation:Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gf84s> retrieved on 2014-11-14 Show headnotes Cited by 0 documents PDF Email Tweet Share SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 DATE: 20141113 DOCKET: 35380 BETWEEN: Harish Bhasin, carrying on business as Bhasin & Associates Appellant and Larry Hrynew and Heritage Education Funds Inc. (formerly known as Allianz Education Funds Inc., formerly known as Canadian American Financial Corp. (Canada) Limited) Respondents CORAM: McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: Cromwell J. (McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, (paras. 1 to 112) Abella, Rothstein, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. concurring) NOTE: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports. BHASIN v.HRYNEW Harish Bhasin, carrying on business as Bhasin & Associates Appellant v. Larry Hrynew and Heritage Education Funds Inc. (formerly known as Allianz Education Funds Inc., formerly known as Canadian American Financial Corp. (Canada) Limited) Respondents Indexed as: Bhasin v. Hrynew 2014 SCC 71 File No.: 35380. 2014: February 12; 2014: November 13. Present: McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ALBERTA Contracts— Breach — Performance — Non-renewal provision — Duty of good faith — Duty of honest performance — Agreement governing relationship between company and retail dealer providing for automatic contract renewal at end of three-year term unless parties giving six months’ written notice to contrary — Company deciding not to renew dealership agreement — Retail dealer lost value of business and majority of sales agents solicited by competitor agency — Retail dealer suing company and competitor agency — Whether common law requiring new general duty of honesty in contractual performance — Whether company breaching that duty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duty of Good Faith and Contracts in the Energy Sector Séan C. O'n I. Introduction
    GOOD FAITH IN THE ENERGY SECTOR 349 HONOUR AMONG BUSINESSPEOPLE: THE DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND CONTRACTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR NEIL FINKELSTEIN, BRANDON KAIN, CRAIG SPURN, SÉAN C. O’NEILL, AND JUSTIN H. NASSERI* The recognition of a “duty of good faith” was a contentious issue for Canadian courts for many years, despite its recognition in other jurisdictions. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized that parties to a contract have a duty to perform all contractual obligations in good faith. This article explores the history behind the “duty of good faith,” the consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision, and the impacts of the decision. This article also examines the effects of the decision as they relate to contracts fashioned in the energy sector, specifically in relation to rights of first refusal (ROFRs), authorizations for expenditure, and accounting and remittance of production sales proceeds. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 350 II. GOOD FAITH AND CONTRACT LAW PRE-BHASIN ................... 350 A. GOOD FAITH IN CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW OF CANADIAN CASE LAW ........................ 351 B. THE DEBATE ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF A FREE-STANDING DUTY OF GOOD FAITH .................. 358 C. 2013: UNCERTAINTY IN THE LAW COMES TO THE FOREFRONT ............................... 361 D. FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS ................................. 362 III. THE DECISION IN BHASIN ..................................... 365 A. BACKGROUND ......................................... 365 B. THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION .......................... 366 C. THE ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE OF GOOD FAITH EXPLAINED ....... 367 D. THE DUTY OF HONEST PERFORMANCE ...................... 369 IV. WHAT BHASIN ACCOMPLISHES ................................. 370 V. UNCERTAINTY POST-BHASIN .................................. 371 A. SILENCE ON THE PRE-CONTRACTUAL STAGE .................. 371 B. SCOPE AND APPLICATION OF DUTY OF HONEST PERFORMANCE .........................
    [Show full text]
  • LEGAL UPDATE April 11, 2021
    Canadian College of Construction Lawyers L.U. #159 LEGAL UPDATE April 11, 2021 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Case Comment: Wastech Services Ltd. v. Canada: 1 Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Case Comment: Wastech Services Ltd. Construction contracts will typically afford various discretionary powers to the parties: for example, terms relating to management of change, delay, Canada: 4 Good Faith for the 2020s performance of the work, termination, and an owner’s right to issue instruc- tions or directions, to name a few. In recent years practitioners have grap- Canada: 9 Update on Adjudication pled with some degree of uncertainty regarding the limitations, if any, im- and Prompt Payment posed by the common law on the exercise of discretionary contractual pow- Initiatives in Canada ers. Must the deciding party have regard to the other party’s contractual Alberta: 15 expectations? Does the doctrine of good faith impose hard limits on the ex- Bill 32, the Restoring ercise of discretion in addition to any express limits negotiated between the Balance in Alberta’s Work- parties? If so, what are those limits? Courts have offered various answers places Act, 2020 following the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 Ontario: 19 SCC 71 (“Bhasin”), in which it recognized the organizing principle of good Christian Labour Associa- tion of Canada faith and a duty of honest performance of contractual obligations. Nova Scotia: 22 Old Act, New Trick: NS On February 5, 2021 the Supreme Court published its reasons in Wastech Court Finds Novel Solution Services Ltd. v. Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, 2021 for Owners SCC 7 (“Wastech”).
    [Show full text]
  • 199 an Action on the Equities: Re
    RE-CHARACTERIZING BHASIN AS EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL 199 AN ACTION ON THE EQUITIES: RE-CHARACTERIZING BHASIN AS EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL KRISH MAHARAJ* In its 2014 decision of Bhasin v. Hrynew, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized that a duty of honest performance exists between contracting parties. Academics, practitioners, and courts across the nation have since contemplated the meaning and role of such a duty. This article looks to Australia’s doctrine of “equitable estoppel,” the equivalent of Canada’s “promissory estoppel,” to explain the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision. It thereby posits that the duty of honest performance can be re-characterized and interpreted as equitable estoppel. In that manner, the article provides a perspective that clarifies the newly proclaimed duty, and potentially answers several of the outstanding questions regarding the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Bhasin. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 199 II. A DOCTRINE AFFECTING CONTRACTS, BUT NOT A CONTRACT DOCTRINE .............................. 200 A. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ............................. 200 B. WHY DHP IS NOT A CLAIM IN CONTRACT .................... 202 III. WHY DHP IS IN ESSENCE EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL ................... 206 A. WHY AND HOW ESTOPPEL IS RELEVANT AT ALL ............... 206 B. HOW BHASIN CAN BE VIEWED AS A CASE OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL ........................ 213 IV. CONCLUSION .............................................. 223 I. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Bhasin
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Business Review of the Americas
    Law and Business Review of the Americas VOLUME 20 WINTER 2014 NUMBER 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SYMPOSIUM ISSUE 2014 ARTICLES Franchising in the United States Honey V. Gandhi .......................................... 3 Franchise Legislation in Canada Jeffrey P. Hoffman ........................................ 25 Opportunity for US-Based Franchises in Mexico: Legal Overview and Potential Pitfalls Lorelee P. Dodge .......................................... 55 Franchising in Argentina: Challenges for the Foreign Franchisor Gustavo M. Papeschi ...................................... 71 Update: Franchising in Brazil Kitty McGahey ............................................ 95 Franchise Law in Chile: Current Issues and Future Outlook Guillermo Carey, Tim R. Samples, and Paulina Silva ...... 107 CASE NOTE Australia’s Updated Franchise Code of Conduct: Does an Express Obligation of Good Faith Benefit the Franchisor or Franchisee? Natalie Sears .............................................. 121 UPDATES Two Down, Eleven to Go: Creating a Canadian SEC or Something Like It John J. Kappel ............................................. 133 Brazil’s Landmark Anti-Corruption Law Michelle Richard .......................................... 141 American Trade News Highlights for Winter 2013: Costco Cashews-How Much Roasting Makes Them American for Purposes of NAFTA Preferential Tariff Treatment by Canada? Vanessa Humm ............................................ 149 Editorial and Submission Policies: should ensure that the significance of a con- tribution would
    [Show full text]