BOS Lieutenant Governors.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prayer Practices
Floor Action 5-145 Prayer Practices Legislatures operate with a certain element of pomp, ceremony and procedure that flavor the institution with a unique air of tradition and theatre. The mystique of the opening ceremonies and rituals help to bring order and dignity to the proceedings. One of these opening ceremonies is the offering of a prayer. Use of legislative prayer. The practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer is long- standing. The custom draws its roots from both houses of the British Parliament, which, according to noted parliamentarian Luther Cushing, from time ”immemorial” began each day with a “reading of the prayers.” In the United States, this custom has continued without interruption at the federal level since the first Congress under the Constitution (1789) and for more than a century in many states. Almost all state legislatures still use an opening prayer as part of their tradition and procedure (see table 02-5.50). In the Massachusetts Senate, a prayer is offered at the beginning of floor sessions for special occasions. Although the use of an opening prayer is standard practice, the timing of when the prayer occurs varies (see table 02-5.51). In the majority of legislative bodies, the prayer is offered after the floor session is called to order, but before the opening roll call is taken. Prayers sometimes are given before floor sessions are officially called to order; this is true in the Colorado House, Nebraska Senate and Ohio House. Many chambers vary on who delivers the prayer. Forty-seven chambers allow people other than the designated legislative chaplain or a visiting chaplain to offer the opening prayer (see table 02-5.52). -
Chapter VI, Executive Department
A Comparative Analysis of the Michigan Constitution Volume I Article VI Citizens Research Council of Michigan 1526 David Stott Building 204 Bauch Building Detroit, 26, Michigan Lansing 23, Michigan Report Number 208 October 1961 Citizens Research Council of Michigan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER VI EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT Page A. State Officers - Election and Term 1 B. General Powers of the Governor - Executive Organization 9 C. The Governor’s Power of Appointment and Removal 22 1. Power of Appointment 22 2. Power of Removal 27 D. Civil Service Commission 32 E. The Governor’s Relations with the Legislature 41 1. Messages to the Legislature 41 2. Writs of Election for Legislative Vacancies 42 3. Convening Special Legislative Session 43 4. Convening Legislature Elsewhere Than at State Capital 45 5. Gubernatorial Veto 46 6. Item Veto 53 F. Other Powers of the Governor 56 1. Military Powers 56 2. Reprieves, Commutations and Pardons 58 3. Use of the Great Seal 62 VI Executive Department 4. Issuance of Commissions 63 G. Eligibility, Lieutenant Governor, Succession and Other Provisions 65 1. Eligibility to Office of Governor 65 2. Prohibition of Dual Office Holding and Legislative Appointment 66 3. Lieutenant Governor 68 4. Devolution of the Governor’s Powers upon Lieutenant Governor 72 5. Succession Beyond Lieutenant Governor 76 6. Compensation of State Officers 78 7. Boards of State Auditors, Escheats and Fund Commission 80 (See over for Section detail) Page Article VI, Section 1 ...................................................................... -
Members of the Tennessee General Assembly 1794 – Present
TENNESSEE SENATORS HISTORICAL LISTING ANDERSON COUNTY – WILSON COUNTY COMPILED BY DIANE BLACK LIBRARIAN TENNESSEE STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES 403 7TH AVENUE NORTH NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0312 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Tennessee General Assembly − Senate Introduction – Individual Counties ii Historical Listings – Anderson County – Wilson County 1 – 255 State Senators Political Parties 1887 – 2010 256 Sources 256 i Tennessee General Assembly − Senate Introduction – Individual Counties Beginning with Anderson County and ending with Wilson County, Tennessee, I have listed the state senator who represented that county. Despite extensive research the following counties General Assembly Senators could not be found (Benton – 23rd; Carter – 10th; Cumberland – 37th; Dickson – 17th; Jackson – 10th; Lake – 40th; Obion – 40th; Overton – 10th; Union – 37th; and Van Buren – 29th). Each county listing has the state senator who represented that county, General Assembly, years of service and beginning with the Forty-Fifth General Assembly (1887), the political party if known is listed. If a State Senator died in office or resigned I have tried to note this date and the date his or her replacement was elected or appointed to office. The web link to the Acts of Tennessee as to formation of a county is given along with the common abbreviation used for that county, except for Tennessee County which does not have an abbreviation. ii MEMBERS OF THE TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1794 – PRESENT SENATE ANDERSON COUNTY – 1801 - A County Formation in Acts of Tennessee - Anderson County passed on November 6, 1801 http://state.tn.us/tsla/history/county/actanderson.htm NAME POLITICAL GENERAL YEARS PARTY ASSEMBLY White, James 5th 1803 – 1805 (General) Houston, Robert 6th 1805 – 1807 Preston, George 7th (1st Session − September 24 – died in office before December 4, 1807 1808) Brown, William 7th – 8th (2nd April 3, 1809 – session) September 15, 1811 Rogers, James R. -
A Student's Guide to the Tennessee
The MembersA of theStudent’s Senate Guide to the Tennessee Senate 2013 Edition Welcome to the Tennessee Senate. Thank you for your interest in your government. My name is Ron Ramsey. I am the Lieutenant Governor of Tennessee. I have this job because a majority of my fellow senators voted for me to be their leader, or “Speaker.” Unlike many other states, Tennessee’s Lieutenant Governor is also head of its Senate. My duties as both Speaker of the Senate and Lieutenant Governor keep me very busy. However, because I am a state Senator, my job is officially part-time. Having a part-time legislature is good because it allows elected officials to spend time living and working under the laws they make and with the people they represent. When the legislature is not in session I run a real estate and auction business with my wife, Sindy, in my hometown of Blountville, which is right on the border between Virginia and Tennessee. It is a wonderful town and I am glad to be able to spend time there when the legislature is not in session. If you visit the Capitol on a day when the legislature is in session, you will see me presiding over the Senate. I have a gavel, and I do my best to keep Senate sessions moving along quickly and efficiently so my members can get back home to their families and businesses. I also make all of the Senate’s committee assignments. Much of the Senate’s work goes on in committees so it is important to have the right people working on the right issues. -
The Item Veto in State Courts
Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 1993 The Item Veto in State Courts Richard Briffault Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Richard Briffault, The Item Veto in State Courts, 66 TEMPLE L. REV. 1171 (1993). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/933 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ITEM VETO IN STATE COURTS Richard Briffault * Contemporary debates about state constitutional law have concentrated on the role of state constitutions in the protection of individual rights and have paid less attention to the state constitutional law of government structure.' This is ironic since the emergence of a state jurisprudence of individual rights has been hampered by the similarity of the texts of the state and federal constitutional provisions concerning individual rights, whereas many state constitutional pro- visions dealing with government structure have no federal analogues, and thus state jurisprudence in this area is free to develop outside the dominating shadow of the Federal Constitution and the federal courts. Moreover, as the "laborato- ries of democracy" metaphor suggests, the study of the structural features of state constitutions can enable us to consider alternative means of organizing rep- resentative democratic governments, assess the efficacy of different mechanisms for governing, and illuminate the implications and consequences of aspects of the federal government's structure that we ordinarily take for granted. -
Germaneness Requirements
Floor Action 5-59 Germaneness Requirements Background. The word “germane” usually is defined as “in close relationship, appropriate, relative or pertinent to.” According to Tilson's Parliamentary Law and Procedure, the basic principle of germaneness "lies in the need for orderly legislation." The principle of germaneness was relatively unknown in general parliamentary law before the late 1700s. The Congress of the Confederation—the precursor to the Congress of the United States—made an attempt to address germaneness in 1781. The first formal germaneness rule was adopted by the U.S. House of Representatives in 1789. The text of the original rule was modified in 1822 to read: “No motion or proposition, on a subject different from that under consideration, shall be admitted under color of amendment.” This wording became the basis for most modern germaneness provisions. Current practices. Today, the principle of germaneness is well established. Forty state constitutions contain a provision that requires a bill to address or contain a single subject (see table 00-5.20). In Mississippi, germaneness is implied, but a single subject requirement is not specifically stated in the constitution. No specific single subject provision is set forth by the constitutions in Arkansas, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont. In addition, 80 legislative bodies reported that they have chamber rules on germaneness of amendments or motions (see table 00-5.21). The following 12 chambers do not have germaneness rules. Alabama Senate Oklahoma Senate Hawaii House Tennessee Senate and House Iowa Senate Virginia Senate Michigan Senate West Virginia Senate Nevada House Wyoming Senate and House As shown in table 00-5.22, most legislative assemblies enforce germaneness provisions in committee as well as on the floor. -
2010 Election Results
National Lieutenant Governors Association PRESS ADVISORY November 4, 2010 (updated 12 -14-10) Contact: NLGA Director Julia Hurst (859) 283-1400 ADVISORY ON SPLIT PARTY GOVERNOR / LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SERVICE & ADVISORY ON COMPOSITION OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR- ELECT CLASS The nation will have twenty-six (26) new seconds-in-command across the states this year/in early 2011, as follows: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin. The territory of Guam also elected a new lieutenant governor. The following analysis includes the fifty known lieutenant governors / officials first in line of gubernatorial succession (as of December 14, 2010), who will be inaugurated through December of 2010 and January of 2011. Some lieutenant governors are elected to office in the general election on a ticket with the governor while others are elected independently of the governor in the general election. For this reason and sometimes due to other circumstance, a governor and lieutenant governor (or the official first in line of succession) may be of different parties. (see “Method of Election” on NLGA web site at www.nlga.us) . As of December 14, 2010, six states are slated to have a governor and lieutenant governor (or official first in line of succession) of opposite parties and one state with an official holding both positions. The states are as follows: Arkansas (D/R), Missouri (D/R), Montana (D/R), New Hampshire (D/R)*, Rhode Island (I/D), and Vermont (D/R). -
Tennessee Office of Lt
Tennessee Office of Lt. Governor Data Sheet As of April 23, 2019 History of Office The title of Lieutenant Governor was not used in Tennessee until 1951 as affirmation of the fact that the Speaker of the Tennessee Senate is first in line of succession to the Governor of the state. The actual title is Lt. Governor and Speaker of the Senate. The Speaker of the Tennessee Senate has existed since statehood and the first state Constitution of 1796.1 See NLGA’s Tennessee statutory duties page for the actual language. Origins of the Office The Speaker of the Tennessee Senate was created with statehood and the Constitution of 1796. The title of Lt. Governor was added in 1951. Qualifications for Office The Council of State Governments (CSG) publishes the Book of the States (BOS) 2015. In chapter 4, Table 4.13 lists the Qualifications and Terms of Office for lieutenant governors: The Book of the States 2015 (CSG) at www.csg.org. Method of Election The National Lieutenant Governors Association (NLGA) maintains a list of the methods of electing gubernatorial successors at: http://www.nlga.us/lt-governors/office-of-lieutenant-governor/methods-of- election/. Duties and Powers A lieutenant governor may derive responsibilities one of four ways: from the Constitution, from the Legislature through statute, from the governor (thru gubernatorial appointment or executive order), thru personal initiative in office, and/or a combination of these. The principal and shared constitutional responsibility of every gubernatorial successor is to be the first official in the line of succession to the governor’s office. -
State of Tennessee State General United States President United
State of Tennessee November 3, 2020 State General United States President 1 Donald J. Trump - Republican 1,852,475 2 Joseph R. Biden - Democratic 1,143,711 3 Don Blankenship - Independent 5,365 4 Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente - Independent 1,860 5 Howie Hawkins - Independent 4,545 6 Jo Jorgensen - Independent 29,877 7 Alyson Kennedy - Independent 2,576 8 Gloria La Riva - Independent 2,301 9 Kanye West - Independent 10,279 10 Write-In - R19 Boddie 1 11 Write-In - Brian Carroll 762 12 Write-In - Tom Hoefling 31 13 Write-In - Jade Simmons 68 14 Write-In - Kasey Wells 0 Total Votes 3,053,851 United States Senate 1 Bill Hagerty - Republican 1,840,926 2 Marquita Bradshaw - Democratic 1,040,691 3 Yomi "Fapas" Faparusi Sr. - Independent 10,727 4 Jeffrey Alan Grunau - Independent 4,160 5 Ronnie Henley - Independent 8,478 6 G. Dean Hill - Independent 4,872 7 Steven J. Hooper - Independent 9,609 8 Aaron James - Independent 7,203 9 Elizabeth McLeod - Independent 16,652 10 Kacey Morgan - Independent 9,598 11 Eric William Stansberry - Independent 6,781 12 Write-In - John A. Gentry 64 13 Write-In - Al Green 0 Total Votes 2,959,761 December 2, 2020 State of Tennessee November 3, 2020 State General United States House of Representatives District 1 1 Diana Harshbarger - Republican 228,181 2 Blair Walsingham - Democratic 68,617 3 Steve Holder - Independent 8,621 4 Write-In - Josh Berger 4 Total Votes 305,423 United States House of Representatives District 2 1 Tim Burchett - Republican 238,907 2 Renee Hoyos - Democratic 109,684 3 Matthew L. -
Lessons from the Deukmejian Era for Contemporary California State Budgeting
FROM JERRYRIGGED TO PETERED OUT: LESSONS FROM THE DEUKMEJIAN ERA FOR CONTEMPORARY CALIFORNIA STATE BUDGETING Daniel J.B. Mitchell, UCLA HoSu Wu Professor of Management and Public Policy The new governor took office in the midst of a major state budget crisis. At the time he took office, it was unclear that state could pay its bills if drastic action were not taken. Yet the incoming governor was committed to a notaxincrease program. Through borrowing, the state managed to surmount its budget crisis. As the economy recovered and resulting tax revenue flowed in, it even was able to engage in major construction projects. When he stood for re election, the governor was overwhelmingly returned to office for a second term. Sadly, however, the economy began to slow during that second term. Fears mounted that the state could face a renewed budget crisis. This description may seem to depict the career to date of Arnold Schwarzenegger. He inherited a budget crisis from Gray Davis who he replaced in the 2003 recall. But the introductory vignette actually refers to the story of George Deukmejian (“Duke”) who was first elected in 1982, inheriting a budget crisis from Jerry Brown. (Deukmejian’s construction projects leaned towards prisons for most of his terms in office, needed as state sentencing laws tightened, rather than the roads and other infrastructure pushed by Schwarzenegger.) And as it turned out, the economic downturn that began to take shape towards the end of Deukmejian’s second term indeed did produce a major budget crisis, a legacy he left for his successor, Pete Wilson. -
Tennessee State Senate
Tennessee State Senate 110 th General Assembly Student Activity Book © Published by the Office of the Chief Clerk Who Is My Senator? (Find your County, color your Senator’s District, circle your Senator’s name.) Senators and Districts District Senator District Senator District Senator 1. Senator Steve Southerland 12. Senator Ken Yager 23. Senator Jack Johnson 2. Senator Doug Overbey 13. Senator Bill Ketron 24. Senator John Stevens 3. Senator Rusty Crowe 14. Senator Jim Tracy 25. Senator Kerry Roberts 4. Senator Jon Lundberg 15. Senator Paul Bailey 26. Senator Dolores Gresham 5. Lt. Governor Randy McNally 16. Senator Janice Bowling 27. Senator Ed Jackson 6. Senator Becky Duncan Massey 17. Senator Mae Beavers 28. Senator Joey Hensley 7. Senator Richard Briggs 18. Senator Ferrell Haile 29. Senator Lee Harris 8. Senator Frank S. Niceley 19. Senator Thelma Harper 30. Senator Sara Kyle 9. Senator Mike Bell 20. Senator Steven Dickerson 31. Senator Brian Kelsey 10. Senator Todd Gardenhire 21. Senator Jeff Yarbro 32. Senator Mark Norris 11. Senator Bo Watson 22. Senator Mark Green 33. Senator Reginald Tate How a Bill Becomes a Law in Tennessee House of Representatives Senate Representative introduces the bill Senator introduces the bill “Companion Bills” Introduced Speaker refers at same time Speaker refers bill to committee bill to committee Committees study bill Hearings, public comment Bill passes Bill passes committee and is committee and is placed on House placed on Senate Calendar Calendar Representatives debate Senators debate and and possibly -
Steve Cohen (D-Tn-09)
LEGISLATOR US Representative STEVE COHEN (D-TN-09) IN OFFICE CONTACT Up for re-election in 2016 Email Contact Form https://cohen.house.gov/ 5th Term contact-me Re-elected in 2014 Web cohen.house.gov http://cohen.house.gov Twitter @#!/repcohen http://twitter.com/#!/ repcohen Facebook View on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/ CongressmanSteveCohen? ref=ts DC Office 2404 Rayburn House Office Building BGOV BIOGRAPHY By Brian Nutting, Bloomberg News Steve Cohen’s voting record, rhetoric and legislative priorities all show him to be to the left on the political spectrum, keeping him in tune with his urban, majority-black Memphis constituency. He’s a member of the Progressive Caucus, a group of the most liberal members of Congress, and he casts a dependably Democratic vote. On his congressional website, he touts his high ratings from a long list of liberal interest groups. His website doesn’t highlight the obverse: the American Conservative Union’s lifetime rating for Cohen was 3 percent and his Club for Growth rating was 7 percent through 2013. He represents the largest percentage of black constituents of any white lawmaker in Congress. In the 113th Congress, Tennessee’s 9th District is 63 percent black, according to 2010 Census figures, and its median income was the lowest in the state. Cohen, who is Jewish, has won 11 elections, at the local, state and congressional level, successfully persuading minority voters that he has their interests at heart and can best represent them. In each of his House elections, Cohen has defeated black opponents in the Democratic primary and before going on to win general elections.