DOCSLIB.ORG

Gateway Park 2018 Naiop & Uli University Challenge: Lafayette Square Mall Redevelopment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gateway Park 2018 Naiop & Uli University Challenge: Lafayette Square Mall Redevelopment GATEWAY PARK 2018 NAIOP & ULI UNIVERSITY CHALLENGE: LAFAYETTE SQUARE MALL REDEVELOPMENT Ashley Bedell • Matthew Crouch • Jess Lawhead • Nathan Lowery • Chris McKinney Nirav Patel • Anthony Schneider • Justin Strinka • Darren Trimble • Kris Wright APRIL 6, 2018 Gateway Park Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Project Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 4 History of Area ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Market Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Demographics .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Product Type Review (Highest and Best Use) ................................................................................................ 6 Multi-Family ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Office ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Retail ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Industrial ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Future Development ..................................................................................................................................... 7 SWOT Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 7 Strengths ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Weaknesses .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Opportunity .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Threats ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Development Plan ............................................................................................................................... 8 Acquisition Phase ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Phase One .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Phase Two .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Leasing Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Tenant relocation plan .................................................................................................................................. 8 Compliance with Gateway Study ................................................................................................................ 10 Financing ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Lafayette Square Mall Valuation ....................................................................................................... 11 Current Tenants .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Rent Estimate ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Operating Expenses: NNN Expenses ............................................................................................................ 11 Net Operating Income ................................................................................................................................ 12 Projected Valuation .................................................................................................................................... 12 Budget .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Site Preparation .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Soft & Hard Costs Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 14 Proforma Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 14 Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................... 14 BTCF Analysis 1: Developer invests 30% Equity ........................................................................................... 15 BTCF Analysis 2: $15M of Mezz Debt ........................................................................................................... 15 BTCF Analysis 3: $10M of Mezz Debt & Owner Donation of Land ................................................................ 15 BTCF Analysis 4: Only Perform Site Work Needed for Phase 1 ..................................................................... 15 2 Gateway Park BTCF Analysis 5: Sale of Land at Exit from Development ............................................................................. 15 BTCF Analysis 6: Pari Passu Joint Venture ................................................................................................... 15 References ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Appendix ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Exhibit A: Site Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Exhibit B: Parcel Information ...................................................................................................................... 20 Exhibit C: Development Plan Outline .......................................................................................................... 21 Exhibit D: Demolition Area ......................................................................................................................... 23 Exhibit E: Construction Schedule ................................................................................................................. 24 Exhibit F: Relocation Options ...................................................................................................................... 26 Exhibit G: Mall Valuation ............................................................................................................................ 27 Exhibit H: Project Timeline .......................................................................................................................... 31 Exhibit I: Soft & Hard Cost Analysis ............................................................................................................. 32 Exhibit J: Proforma Data (BTCF Analysis 1 & 6) ............................................................................................ 34 Exhibit K: Proforma Output (BTCF Analysis 1) ............................................................................................. 35 Exhibit L: Termination/Relocation Assumptions .......................................................................................... 39 3 Gateway Park INTRODUCTION renovation, including addition of a food court, was completed but the mall continued to lose anchor Project Overview tenants: Lazarus in 2002, JCPenney in 2005, then The mission of this project is to determine the highest Macy’s (previously L. S. Ayres) in 2009 (Milz, and best use for the Lafayette Square Mall site. A 2009). Lafayette Square Mall has continued to development on the site should be profitable for struggle to retain anchor tenants, with only portions investors, maximize job creation and encourage of two of five anchor tenant spaces currently occupied community investment and engagement. The by Burlington Coat Factory and Shopper’s World. Lafayette Square area needs to be rebranded as a diverse business center
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Track Record of Prior Experience of the Senior Cobalt Team
    Track Record of Prior Experience of the Senior Cobalt Team Dedicated Executives PROPERTY City Square Property Type Responsibility Company/Client Term Feet COLORADO Richard Taylor Aurora Mall Aurora, CO 1,250,000 Suburban Mall Property Management - New Development DeBartolo Corp 7 Years CEO Westland Center Denver, CO 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and $30 million Disposition May Centers/ Centermark 9 Years North Valley Mall Denver, CO 700,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and Redevelopment First Union 3 Years FLORIDA Tyrone Square Mall St Petersburg, FL 1,180,000 Suburban Mall Property Management DeBartolo Corp 3 Years University Mall Tampa, FL 1,300,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 2 Years Property Management, Asset Management, New Development Altamonte Mall Orlando, FL 1,200,000 Suburban Mall DeBartolo Corp and O'Connor Group 1 Year and $125 million Disposition Edison Mall Ft Meyers, FL 1,000,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and Redevelopment The O'Connor Group 9 Years Volusia Mall Daytona Beach ,FL 950,000 Suburban Mall Property and Asset Management DeBartolo Corp 1 Year DeSoto Square Mall Bradenton, FL 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management DeBartolo Corp 1 Year Pinellas Square Mall St Petersburg, FL 800,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 1 Year EastLake Mall Tampa, FL 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 1 Year INDIANA Lafayette Square Mall Indianapolis, IN 1,100,000 Suburban Mall Property Management
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's 4Th District Through 2011
    1 LIHTC Properties in Michigan's 4th District through 2011 Annual Low Rent or Tax- Zip Nonprofit Allocation Allocated Year Placed Total Income Income Exempt Project Name Address City State Code Sponsor Year Amount in Service Construction Type Units Units Ceiling Credit Percentage Bond Adam's Acres 4612 Quincy Dr Midland MI 48642 No 2002 2003 New Construction 12 12 70 % present value No Alma Apts 230 Windsor St Alma MI 48801 No 1987 1987 New Construction 32 32 30 % present value No Arbor Glen Apts 120 W North St Saint Charles MI 48655 No 1990 1990 Acquisition And Rehab 48 48 30 % present value No Arbors At Eagle Crest 5100 N Eagle Crst Mt Pleasant MI 48858 No 2000 2001 New Construction 120 120 70 % present value No Arbors At Eagle Crest Ii 5100 N Eagle Crst Mount Pleasant MI 48858 No 2006$ 421,513 2007 New Construction 48 48 60% AMGI 70 % present value No Brackton Woods 5301 Dublin Ave Midland MI 48640 No 1994 1995 New Construction 104 103 70 % present value No Briarwood Apartments 304 Briarwood St Clare MI 48617 No 2003 2004 New Construction 36 35 70 % present value No Byron Manor Apartments 426 N Church St Byron MI 48418 No 1995 1996 Acquisition And Rehab 16 15 30 % present value No Cambridge Court Apartments 305 S Walnut St Greenville MI 48838 No 2000 2001 Acquisition And Rehab 32 31 Both 30% and 70% No Carriage Towne Place Apts Ii 204 E Williams St Ovid MI 48866 No 2003 2004 New Construction 12 12 70 % present value No Carson City Senior Apts 510 N 2nd St Carson City MI 48811 No 1992 1993 New Construction 24 24 30 % present value No Carson Place 420 E Grove St Carson City MI 48811 No 2002 2003 Acquisition And Rehab 22 22 Both 30% and 70% No Cedar Village Ii 1427 N Spring St Gladwin MI 48624 1989 1989 New Construction 8 8 Not Indicated No Century Place Apartments 1200 E Washington St Greenville MI 48838 1989 1989 Acquisition And Rehab 47 47 Not Indicated No Century Place Ii Apts.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-County and Regional Transit Plan Technical Memorandum #2
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 EXISTING TRIC COMMUTER TRAVEL DATA IN THE FIVE-COUNTY NORTHERN NEVADA REGION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 FOR INTER-COUNTY AND REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN Prepared for: Planning Division Nevada Department of Transportation 1263 South Stewart Street Carson City, Nevada 89712 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 5370 Kietzke Lane Suite 100 Reno, Nevada 89511 775-787-7552 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Ó February 2019 092202043 2019-02-12 Tech Memo #2.docx Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 1.1. Study Area Population ..................................................................................................1 1.2. Study Area Employment ...............................................................................................1 1.3. Tahoe Reno Industrial Center (TRIC) ............................................................................2 1.4. Purpose ........................................................................................................................5 1.5. Document Organization ................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Indianapolis-Area Commercial Property Management Firms (Ranked by Gross Leasable Area Managed Locally (1))
    Largest Indianapolis-Area Commercial Property Management Firms (Ranked by gross leasable area managed locally (1)) LOCAL FTE: BROKERS / PERCENT LOCAL PROPERTIES AGENTS HQ LOCATION RANK FIRM GLA MANAGED(1): OFFICE MANAGED HEAD(S) OF LOCAL EMPLOYEES: OF OWNERS: ESTAB. 2009 ADDRESS LOCALLY RETAIL LARGEST INDIANAPOLIS-AREA % OF SPACE OPERATIONS, TITLE(S) PROPERTY MGT. % INDIANA LOCALLY rank TELEPHONE / FAX / WEB SITE NATIONALLY INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES MANAGED OWNED BY FIRM LOCAL DIRECTOR(S) TOTAL % OTHER HQ CITY Cassidy Turley (2) 29.7 million 30 Keystone at the Crossing, 156 Jeffrey L. Henry, 48 26 1918 One American Square, Suite 1300, 46282 420.0 million 4 Precedent Office Park, 0 managing principal 142 74 St. Louis 1 (317) 634-6363 / fax (317) 639-0504 / cassidyturley.com 66 Castleton Park Timothy J. Michel 199 1 Duke Realty Corp. 28.5 million 20 AllPoints Midwest Bldg. 1, 187 Don Dunbar, EVP; 10 DND 1972 600 E. 96th St., Suite 100, 46240 141.9 million 0 Lebanon Building 12, 87 Charlie E. Podell, SVP 20 DND Indianapolis 2 (317) 808-6000 / fax (317) 808-6770 / dukerealty.com 80 Lebanon Building 2 Ryan Rothacker; Chris Yeakey 400 2 CB Richard Ellis 13.0 million DND Intech Park, DND David L. Reed, 33 DND 1981 101 W. Washington St., Suite 1000E, 46204 11.5 million DND Capital Center, DND managing director 31 DND Los Angeles 3 (317) 269-1000 / fax (317) 637-4404 / cbre.com DND Metropolis Andy Banister 99 4 Prologis 10.5 million DND 715 AirTech Parkway, 55 Elizabeth A. Kauchak, DND DND 1994 8102 Zionsville Road, 46268 DND DND 281 AirTech Parkway, 100 vice president, market officer DND DND Denver 4 (317) 228-6200 / fax (317) 228-6201 / prologis.com 100 558 AirTech Parkway Susan Harvey DND 3 Kite Realty Group Trust 8.8 million 57 Eli Lilly and Co., 75 John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Industrial Park
    CENTENNIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK ACRES OF OPPORTUNITY CENTENNIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK NE AERIAL PERSPECTIVE | CENTENNIAL PARK LOT 1 INDUSTRIAL BUILDING VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON. TOP 10 REASONS TO DO A GREAT PLACE TO DO BUSINESS. BUSINESS IN CLARK COUNTY Love where you work and live. Clark County, home of the Port of 1. PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS CLIMATE Vancouver USA, is the fastest-growing county in the state of 2. DEVELOPMENT TEAM/PUBLIC/ Washington. Strategically located on the Pacific Rim and bridging the PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS states of Washington and Oregon, Vancouver is also part of the Portland 3. AVAILABLE LAND metropolitan area, one of the country’s most vibrant business locales. 4. LOW TAXES 5. SKILLED WORKFORCE Clark County offers workers and their families all the advantages of a major metropolitan city, including access to affordable housing, cultural 6. EXCELLENT TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE and recreational opportunities, and quality school options for primary, 7. EASY ACCESS TO PDX secondary and higher education. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT With so much to offer, it’s no surprise the port has become a center for 8. LOW COST OF LIVING a diverse array of today’s leading industries. 9. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 10. OUTSTANDING LIVABILITY 3103 NW Lower River Road Phone: 360.693.3611 Fax: 360.735.1565 www.portvanusa.com Vancouver, Washington 98660 503.289.8824 503.285.6091 [email protected] Please contact Mike Schiller ([email protected]) or Chrissy Lyons ([email protected]) for leasing information. CENTENNIAL 67 ACRES OF OPPORTUNITY INDUSTRIAL PARK Possibility, meet potential. While many ports are constrained by a lack of available land in highly urbanized areas, Port of C.I.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Park Compendium Final 2012
    Regional Conference on Industrial Parks 17 – 18 April 2012 ••• Baku, Azerbaijan Conference Report Europe and Central Asia Regional Conference on Industrial Parks In collaboration with the Ministry of Economic Development and the Ministry of Industry and Energy of the Republic of Azerbaijan Supported by UNIDO and the Government of Slovenia 3 4 Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 7 2 Overview of issues............................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Advantages of industrial parks................................................................................... 10 2.2 Evolution and different types of industrial parks....................................................... 11 2.3 Developing and managing a successful industrial park ............................................. 13 2.4 Industrial park case studies ........................................................................................ 17 2.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 22 3 Report of the conference sessions...................................................................................... 24 3.1 Summary of Day One................................................................................................. 24 3.2 Summary of Day Two: Working group sessions ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CPC Proposed Vol 2 Ch 14 Amendments
    VOLUME 2 | CHAPTER 14 | LAND USE PLAN chapterr 14 LAND USE PLAN GOAL POLICIES FOR DECISION MAKERS NEIGHBORHOODS 1 Promote smart • Preserve and support the character of successful residential growth land use neighborhoods. patterns in New • Revitalize challenged neighborhoods with new development that Orleans and the contributes to character and new vitality. region. • Locate higher-density uses at existing and proposed transit stations and hubs for critical mass and locate new transit to serve higher density areas. • Make downtown a vibrant 24-hour neighborhood and commercial/entertainment district. • Convert suburban style commercial strips and malls into walkable mixed-use centers. • Create neighborhood centers with a mixture of higher-density housing, retail and other uses at neighborhood edges on underutilized industrial/commercial land and key transit hubs. • Avoid new development where new infrastructure would be required. • Take advantage of vacant land on higher ground for higher density uses. • Preserve and protect environmentally sensitive land and coastal areas. • Promote walkable, mixed-use environments. 2 Promote • Establish urban design frameworks to guide new chain store, development that can office, and light industrial development so that it improves the strengthen the city’s public realm and fits into the urban fabric. tax and job base • Preserve land for industrial uses where there are active and while serving citizen prospective uses. needs and preserving city character. 3 Strengthen the • Establish design principles and standards in zoning and design city’s public realm guidelines for specific areas. and urban design • Create a framework for accepting, placing and maintaining public character. art in a way that ensures excellence and cost-effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA APRIL 26, 2021 All Meetings of the St. Louis Park City
    AGENDA APRIL 26, 2021 All meetings of the St. Louis Park City Council will be conducted by telephone or other electronic means starting March 30, 2020, and until further notice. This is in accordance with the local emergency declaration issued by the city council, in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and Governor Walz's “Stay Safe MN” executive order 20-056. The St. Louis Park City Council will meet on April 26, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. by videoconference to reconvene the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (LBAE), which will be followed by a joint study session with the St. Louis Park Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals. Meeting participants will meet by electronic device or phone rather than by being personally present at the city council's regular meeting place at 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports. Members of the public who want to address the council during the reconvene of the LBAE should call the 952.562.2886. Call when the meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. and follow instructions provided. Members of the public can monitor the meeting by video and audio at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or by calling +1.312.535.8110 and using access code 372 106 61 for audio only. Cisco Webex will be used to conduct videoconference meetings of the city council, with council members and staff participating from multiple locations. 6:30 p.m. – RECONVENE LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION (LBAE) Immediately following LBAE – STUDY SESSION Discussion items 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study for Improvement of Living Conditions for Workers Around Industrial Areas in Socialist Republic of Vietnam
    MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM THE STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF LIVING CONDITIONS FOR WORKERS AROUND INDUSTRIAL AREAS IN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JULY 2016 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NINE STEPS CORPORATION ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER EI OF JAPAN INCORPORATED JR AZUSA SEKKEI CO., LTD. 16-127 MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM THE STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF LIVING CONDITIONS FOR WORKERS AROUND INDUSTRIAL AREAS IN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JULY 2016 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NINE STEPS CORPORATION ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF JAPAN INCORPORATED AZUSA SEKKEI CO., LTD. The Study for Improvement of Living Conditions for Workers around Industrial Areas Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables List of Annexes Location Map Abbreviations 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 (1) Background of the Study .............................................................................................................................. 1 (2) Objective and Outcomes of the Study .......................................................................................................... 1 2. CURRENT LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF LIVING CONDITIONS OF WORKERS IN INDUSTRIAL PARKS ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Rezoning in U.S. Cities | Manhattan Institute
    January 2021 ISSUE BRIEF INDUSTRIAL REZONING IN U.S. CITIES Connor Harris Fellow Industrial Rezoning in U.S. Cities 2 Contents LIFT THE CAP WHY NEW Introduction YORK ..................................................................CITY NEEDS MORE CHARTER SCHOOLS3 San Francisco, CA ........................................................4 New York, NY ...............................................................5 Boston, MA ..................................................................6 Portland, OR .................................................................7 Chicago, IL ...................................................................8 Conclusion ...................................................................9 Endnotes .................................................................... 11 Issue Brief Industrial Rezoning in U.S. Cities 3 LIFT THE CAP WHY NEW YORK CITY NEEDS MORE CHARTER SCHOOLS Introduction In many of America’s most expensive cities, desirable commercial and residential buildings abut areas filled with stagnant, unproductive, and often decrepit industries. This is not an accident: it is the product of land-use and zoning codes, which often prohibit nonindustrial uses of large, centrally located areas that would otherwise be in high demand for residential and commercial redevelopment. These policies are supposedly a bulwark against gentrification and the depredations of housing developers, as well as a means of preserving high-paying industrial jobs. But these benefits are often illusory, and they
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2020 Market Reports
    LEE-ASSOCIATES.COM/RESEARCH Q4 2020 MARKET REPORTS FEATURED MARKET REPORTS THE LEE ADVANTAGE Every Lee & Associates office delivers world-class service to an array of regional, national, and international clients - from small businesses and local investors to major corporate users and institutional investors. Our professionals combine the latest technology, resources, and market intelligence with their experience, expertise, and commitment to superior service to optimize client results. WHAT SETS US APART? Since 1979, Lee & Associates has reimagined the way that commercial real estate companies should be structured. Each Lee & Associates office is owned and operated by its professionals. As shareholders of the company, this separates us from our competition and creates one common goal; to provide seamless, consistent execution and value- driven market-to-market services to our clients. SERVICES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF OUR CLIENTS Lee & Associates’ offices offer a broad array of real estate services tailored to meet the needs of the company’s clients in each of the markets it operates, including commercial real estate brokerage, integrated services, and construction services. With specialty practice groups in each of these disciplines, our professionals regularly collaborate to make sure they are providing their clients with the most advanced, up-to-date market technology and information. LOCAL EXPERTISE INTERNATIONAL REACH With offices in 60+ markets across North America and a strategic international alliance with Gerald Eve, Lee & Associates has the ability to deliver first-class services to our clients both locally and internationally. Q4 2020 INDUSTRIAL OVERVIEW 2020 GROWTH SOARS ON E-COMMERCE DEMAND FEATURED REPORTS Driven by pandemic-fueled e-commerce sales, 2020 tenant expansion outpaced last year’s total after • AZ, Phoenix a fourth-quarter surge in demand by companies seeking additional warehouse and distribution space • BC, Vancouver to improve supply-chain efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2021 Market Reports
    LEE-ASSOCIATES.COM/RESEARCH Q1 2021 MARKET REPORTS FEATURED MARKET REPORTS THE LEE ADVANTAGE Every Lee & Associates office delivers world-class service to an array of regional, national, and international clients - from small businesses and local investors to major corporate users and institutional investors. Our professionals combine the latest technology, resources, and market intelligence with their experience, expertise, and commitment to superior service to optimize client results. WHAT SETS US APART? Since 1979, Lee & Associates has reimagined the way that commercial real estate companies should be structured. Each Lee & Associates office is owned and operated by its professionals. As shareholders of the company, this separates us from our competition and creates one common goal; to provide seamless, consistent execution and value- driven market-to-market services to our clients. SERVICES TO MEET THE NEEDS OF OUR CLIENTS Lee & Associates’ offices offer a broad array of real estate services tailored to meet the needs of the company’s clients in each of the markets it operates, including commercial real estate brokerage, integrated services, and construction services. With specialty practice groups in each of these disciplines, our professionals regularly collaborate to make sure they are providing their clients with the most advanced, up-to-date market technology and information. LOCAL EXPERTISE INTERNATIONAL REACH With offices in 60+ markets across North America and a strategic international alliance with Gerald Eve, Lee & Associates has the ability to deliver first-class services to our clients both locally and internationally. Q1 2021 INDUSTRIAL OVERVIEW CONSTRUCTION SETS RECORD, GROWTH CONTINUES FEATURED REPORTS Strong tenant expansion continued in the first quarter as developers were underway on a historic • AZ, Phoenix volume of new projects while the pace of rent increases downshifted slightly.
    [Show full text]