N E W S L E T T E R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

N E W S L E T T E R Entomological Society of Victoria N e w s l e t t e r No. 5 December 2014 INDEX Do plants really need insects or is it just vice versa? Do plants really need insects A short history of insects and plants or is it just vice versa?.................................1 An extract of a presentation to the Friends of Cranbourne Botanic Gardens, Melbourne Urban Bioblitz By Patrick Honan, November 2014 photos…………….…………5 This is a complex question with a history of about 450 million years, so only a Do plants really need insects very broad, potted glossy overview is possible. Insects appeared about 50 or is it just vice versa? million years after land plants, but the relationship really took off when (cont’d)……………….……..6 flowering plants appeared about 100 million years ago. The Patch Primary School Insects have utilised plants as a food source to the best of their abilities, and excursion photos…………..9 plants have done everything in their power to prevent being used. Meet your ESV Insects will cooperate with plants where it is in their interest, and vice versa, Council…………………….10 and as long as the reward is high enough. In extreme cases this develops into an obligate mutualism, where a species Articles of interest………..12 of plant cannot survive without the continued existence of a species of insect, and vice versa. ESV upcoming events......18 Around the Socities………18 Herbivory More than half of all insect species are herbivorous, and there are more ESV newsletter goes species of plant-eating insects than there are species of plants in the world. A global………………………19 single eucalypt tree may support more than 100 species of Can you help?...................19 herbivorous insects. Gippsland Lakes Bioscan Many insects are monophagous but photos……………………..20 some will feed on more than 150 plants species; however, ninety Prominent percent of all herbivorous insects entomologists….......……..21 feed on plant species within three Upcoming plant families or fewer. In any given conferences……….………22 habitat, the amount of plant material eaten by insects is 3-4 times that A female Goliath Stick Insect (Eurycnema Addendum – George Vernon goliath) tucking into a eucalypt leaf eaten by mammals. Hudson……..................….23 Defences Given the amount of plant material available on earth, it’s no wonder it’s such a heavily utilised resource. But a remarkable amount of it remains uneaten, due to: Plants being very low in protein – although some plants are up to 20% protein, much of it is not the right sort needed by animals, and insects are protein-rich; www.entsocvic.org.au 1 The majority of a plant is generally low in to the toxins, and specialists struggle because nitrogen – xylem is 0.05% and wood is 0.3% these plants can be hard to find and the nitrogen (although new growth is generally specialist, by its nature, can feed on little else. high in nitrogen); Birdwing butterflies are a good example, feeding Much of the plant is low in water (particularly only on plants of the one genus (Aristolochia). bark, wood and seeds) and insects that feed on these must find other water sources; Many of Cellulose is indigestible to all but a few insects the (eg silverfish and termites); chemicals Silica in grasses is not only indigestible but are not wears down the mouthparts; only toxic Plants are low in sodium, requiring butterflies to the for example to find sodium elsewhere and insects, but concentrate it in their bodies to the Secondary defensive compounds (at least plants 100,000 different types), which can be Wanderer Butterfly caterpillar (Danaus plexippus), also known as the Monarch, themselves, antifeedants or feeding deterrents, or block an feeding on Gomphocarpus cancellatus and so are insect’s ability to extract nutrients, or simply (formerly Asclepias rotundifolia) localised in act as toxins. specialised To help glands or pockets. As a side issue, many insects them that specialise on a toxic plant host adopt digest (sequester) the toxins and use them for their own the sea defence (birdwings, Wanderers, sawfly larvae) or of plants even as sex attractants, aggregation pheromones amongst or moulting hormones. which they live, In some cases, insects (eg arctiid moths) may use many compounds (eg cardenolides) from plants of one insects family (eg Asclepiadaceae) for defences, and A male Common Crow Butterfly (Euploea support a other compounds (eg pyrrolizidine alkaloids) from core) absorbing nutrients from animal dung range of plants of another family (eg Boraginaceae) for gut flora aphrodisiacs and flight arrestants. Although this is or house micro-organisms (often in mycetomes rare. on their bodies). Defences by large trees Defences by herbaceous plants Trees are large enough to support generations of Short-lived herbaceous plants defend themselves insects, giving the insects time to adapt to the against being eaten by apparency, or lack trees’ toxins, and they often grow in forests thereof. They are difficult to find and, once found, where trees of the same species are readily die back before the insects can build up a large available and cannot hide – they are highly enough population to take advantage of them. apparent. They are often pioneering after cyclones or fires, and then disappear, or grow rapidly from the These trees don’t rely so much on toxins, which base with a high tissue turnover, or contain silica may be overcome by the insects, but on (eg grasses). digestibility-reducing compounds such as tannins and on gums and resins. Although not particularly Many use complex toxins (such as alkaloids and toxic, they slow development, reduce the number cyanogenic glucosides), and the rarest toxin is the of generations of insects possible over time, most effective. If any particular compound increase the insects’ exposure to predators, and becomes too common it will attract a larger increase the energy required to consume the number of specialists able to detoxify it, which is plant – about the equivalent of the energy a disadvantage to the plant that produces it. required to find less apparent plants. As a rule, generalist herbivores cannot live on these plants because it takes a specialist to adapt 2 Trees in seasonal areas produce a flush of growth glyphopa), which, combined with the above compounds, sawflies (Perga overwhelm the insects with too much food to be species), consumed in one sitting. Christmas Beetles Some trees, such as eucalypts, supplement their (Anoplognathus digestibility-reducing compounds with extra toxins species) and in their young leaves, and reduce the ability of Eucalyptus insects to adapt to these toxins by ensuring each Lerps tree produces a slightly different toxin through Eucalyptus Lerps (Cardiaspina (Cardiaspina genetic heterogeneity (outcrossing). Genetic albitextura), perhaps the best albitextura). studied native insects in Australia variation is extremely important, resulting in The grazing individuals with the same parents exhibiting pressure is often such that competitive exclusion widely different levels of insect resistance (eg is prevented – no one species of eucalypt can Jarrah (E.marginata) to the Jarrah Leaf Miner dominate all others. (Perthida glyphopa)). Acacias, probably older than eucalypts, are even The level of toxicity in eucalypts, and the more species rich with a wider array of defences importance of coevolution, is demonstrated by (eg extra floral nectaries and myrmeconia), with the lack of introduced insect species that have very high levels of defensive tannins and gums. adapted to them in Australia, and the dearth of insects that attack eucalypts overseas. Another method of defence is to attract the predators or parasites of herbivorous insects. Despite Some plants do it through recruiting ants to the defend their leaves (myrmeconia) or with extra toxicity of floral nectaries. eucalypts, some Physical barriers such as waxes and hairs, groups especially hooked hairs that impale, or sticky hairs such as (glandular trichomes) or other substances that leaf trap small insects tend to be present in lieu of toxins. And lignin, silica and corky tissue in the beetles Eucalyptus Leaf Beetle larvae (Paropsis (eg wood, or tough compounds in the leaves, may species) feeding on their favourite plant Paropsis wear down insect mandibles. atomaria) are completely immune, almost regardless of the Communication level of compounds. The number of ‘eucalypt’ When under attack, many of the defensive species in Australia (more than 400) is possibly compounds produced by plants are highly volatile due to the arms race between this group of trees and are released into the air to be detected by and leaf beetles (Family Chrysomelidae). other plants, which then begin producing defensive compounds of their own, in preparation Try going into a stand of eucalypts and finding a for attack. single leaf undamaged by insects – it’s an It’s unlikely that the plant under attack is warning exercises that can take a very long time. Many its nearby conspecifics or competitors – it’s more native insect species can defoliate and kill entire likely that other plants are ‘eavesdropping’ and eucalypt preparing their own defences in advance. These forests, such compounds are not always species- or even as Spur- family-specific – a given plant will pick up on legged Stick chemicals from a range of other plant species. Insects (Didymuria These compounds are also picked up by parasitic violescens), wasps and some insect predators, which use Jarrah them to hone in one plant which support their Leafminers host caterpillars. Christmas Beetle, Anoplognathus species (Perthida 3 For some time there has been evidence that Problems caused: May cause actively-growing plants communicate with each other through shoots to wilt and die, premature ageing of vibrations, nanochemical oscillations generated leaves followed by leaf fall and reduce overall from within the cells. Again it’s not so much plant vigour. communication with each other, but plants reacting to the presence or activities of other nearby plants.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 13 SOUTHERN AFRICA
    Chapter 13 Zimbabwe Chapter 13 SOUTHERN AFRICA: ZIMBABWE Taxonomic Inventory Taxa and life stages consumed Coleoptera Buprestidae (metallic woodborers) Sternocera funebris (author?), adult Sternocera orissa Buquet, adult Scarabaeidae (scarab beetles) Lepidiota (= Eulepida) anatine (author?), adult Lepidiota (= Eulepida) masnona (author?), adult Lepidiota (= Eulepida)nitidicollis (author?), adult Miscellaneous Coleoptera Scientific name(s) unreported Hemiptera Pentatomidae (stink bugs) Euchosternum (= Haplosterna; = Encosternum) delegorguei (Spinola) (= delagorguei), adult Pentascelis remipes (author?), adult Pentascelis wahlbergi (author?), adult Miscellaneous Hemiptera Scientific name(s) unreported Homoptera Cicadidae (cicadas) Loba leopardina (author?) Hymenoptera Apidae (honey bees) Trigona spp., larvae Formicidae (ants) Carebara vidua Sm., winged adult Isoptera Termitidae Macrotermes falciger Gerstacker (= goliath), winged adult, soldier, queen Macrotermes natalensis Haviland Lepidoptera Lasiocampidae (eggar moths, lappets) Lasiocampid sp., larva Limacodidae (slug caterpillars) Limacodid sp. Notodontidae (prominents) Anaphe panda (Boisdv.), larva Saturniidae (giant silkworm moths) Bunaea (= Bunea) alcinoe (Stoll), larva Bunaea sp., larva Cirina forda (Westwood), larva 1 of 12 9/20/2012 2:02 PM Chapter 13 Zimbabwe Gonimbrasia belina Westwood, larva Goodia kuntzei Dewitz (?), larva Gynanisa sp. (?), larva Imbrasia epimethea Drury, larva Imbrasia ertli Rebel, larva Lobobunaea sp., larva Microgone sp., (?), larva Pseudobunaea sp. (?),
    [Show full text]
  • FNCV Register of Photos
    FNCV Register of photos - natural history (FNCVSlideReg is in Library computer: My computer - Local Disc C - Documents and settings - Library) [Square brackets] - added or updated name Slide number Title Place Date Source Plants SN001-1 Banksia marginata Grampians 1974 001-2 Xanthorrhoea australis Labertouche 17 Nov 1974 001-3 Xanthorrhoea australis Anglesea Oct 1983 001-4 Regeneration after bushfire Anglesea Oct 1983 001-5 Grevillea alpina Bendigo 1975 001-6 Glossodia major / Grevillea alpina Maryborough 19 Oct 1974 001-7 Discarded - out of focus 001-8 [Asteraceae] Anglesea Oct 1983 001-9 Bulbine bulbosa Don Lyndon 001-10 Senecio elegans Don Lyndon 001-11 Scaevola ramosissima (Hairy fan-flower) Don Lyndon 001-12 Brunonia australis (Blue pincushion) Don Lyndon 001-13 Correa alba Don Lyndon 001-14 Correa alba Don Lyndon 001-15 Calocephalus brownii (Cushion bush) Don Lyndon 001-16 Rhagodia baccata [candolleana] (Seaberry saltbush) Don Lyndon 001-17 Lythrum salicaria (Purple loosestrife) Don Lyndon 001-18 Carpobrotus sp. (Pigface in the sun) Don Lyndon 001-19 Rhagodia baccata [candolleana] Inverloch Don Lyndon 001-20 Epacris impressa Don Lyndon 001-21 Leucopogon virgatus (Beard-heath) Don Lyndon 001-22 Stackhousia monogyna (Candles) Don Lyndon 001-23 Correa reflexa (yellow) Don Lyndon 001-24 Prostanthera sp. Don Lyndon Fungi 002-1 Stinkhorn fungus Aseroe rubra Buckety Plains 30/12/1974 Margarey Lester 002-2 Fungi collection: Botany Group excursion Dom Dom Saddle 28 May 1988 002-3 Aleuria aurantia Aug 1966 R&M Jennings Bairnsdale FNC 002-4
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Preferences of the Christmas Beetle Anoplognathus Chloropyrus
    184 Resistance to insect browsing in Eucalyptus grandis clones Feeding preferences of the Christmas beetle Anoplognathus chloropyrus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and four paropsine species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on selected Eucalyptus grandis clonal foliage Caitlin V. Johns1,3, Christine Stone2 and Lesley Hughes1,4 1Dept of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia 2Research and Development Division, State Forests of NSW, PO Box 100, Beecroft, NSW 2119, Australia 3 Current address: Plant Health Australia, 5/4 Phipps Close, Deakin, ACT 2605, Australia 4Email: [email protected] Revised manuscript received 23 December 2003 Summary screening of E. grandis genotypes for susceptibilty to defoliation by leaf-chewing beetles that prefer young soft foliage. Christmas beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) (Anoplognathus spp.) and paropsine leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) are Keywords: insect resistance; defoliation; Christmas beetles; chrysomelids; common defoliators of eucalypts, including several important Eucalyptus grandis plantation species, throughout south-eastern Australia. It has already been demonstrated that populations and individuals of Introduction several eucalypt species vary in susceptibility to defoliation by these leaf-chewing beetles. The objective of this study was to Eucalyptus grandis is viewed in many overseas countries as a determine whether significant variation in resistance to insect desirable plantation species (e.g. Brazil, China and South Africa). herbivory was present in Eucalyptus grandis genotypes selected In Australia, however, the areas planted with E. grandis are in from the hardwood plantation program of State Forests of NSW. decline. A major disincentive to planting this potentially fast- growing species is its susceptibility to defoliating and stem-boring Grafted clones from three young trees with significantly less crown insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Volatile and Non-Volatile Plant Secondary Metabolites in Host Tree Selection by Christmas Beetles
    J Chem Ecol (2011) 37:286–300 DOI 10.1007/s10886-011-9916-5 Role of Volatile and Non-Volatile Plant Secondary Metabolites in Host Tree Selection by Christmas Beetles Mamoru Matsuki & William J. Foley & Robert B. Floyd Received: 27 October 2010 /Revised: 13 December 2010 /Accepted: 31 January 2011 /Published online: 19 February 2011 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 Abstract Individual Eucalyptus trees in south-eastern Aus- species of non-host Eucalyptus, and three species of non-host tralia vary considerably in susceptibility to herbivores. On the non-Eucalyptus trees. Leaf consumption by Christmas one hand, studies with insect herbivores have suggested that beetles was negatively correlated with the concentrations of variation in the concentrations of foliar monoterpenes is sideroxylonals and 1,8-cineole. Artificial increases in the related to variation in susceptibility. On the other, studies with concentration of sideroxylonals or 1,8-cineole reduced leaf marsupial folivores have suggested that variation in the consumption by Christmas beetles. An artificial reduction in concentrations of sideroxylonals (a group of formylated foliar monoterpenes had no effect on leaf consumption by phloroglucinol compounds) is responsible for variation in the beetles when leaves contained high or very low susceptibility. We examined relative importance of side- concentrations of sideroxylonals. However, when the con- roxylonals and 1,8-cineole (a dominant monoterpene) in host centration of sideroxylonals was moderate, a reduction in the tree selection by Christmas beetles (Anoplognathus species: foliar monoterpenes increased leaf consumption by the Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) by using no-choice experiments, beetles. Therefore, monoterpenes such as 1,8-cineole may choice/no-choice experiments, and manipulative experiments be used as a negative cue by Christmas beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Christmas Beetles (Coleoptera
    This document has been scanned from hard-copy archives for research and study purposes. Please note not all information may be current. We have tried, in preparing this copy, to make the content accessible to the widest possible audience but in some cases we recognise that the automatic text recognition maybe inadequate and we apologise in advance for any inconvenience this may cause. STATE FORESTS OF NEW SOU.TH WALES FORESTPROTECTION RESEARCH DIVISION S E R I E S NUM B E R E2 ISSN0158-3832ISBN0731022173 CHRISTMAS BEETLES LIFE HISTORY AND GENERAL BIOLOGY (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) Christmas beetles and other scarabs may have a one or two year life cycle, depending on the species, and Chris Ann Urquhart most of this time is spent as larval stages in the soil S TAT I (Fig. 1). Those species with two-year life cycles have INTRODUCTION FORESTS overlapping generations, so that larvae are always In Australia there are more than 3000 species of present in the soil. beetle in the family Scarabaeidae (scarab beetles, dung beetles and cockchafers), most of which are beneficial or Females lay between 20 and 40 eggs each. They generally of no economic significance. Scarabs are important prefer grassy pastures and moist soils, and tend to avoid recyclers of nutrients in the soil, the larvae feeding on legume dominated pasture and bare, wet or dry soils e roots, dung, rotten wood and rotting vegetation. The (although some species may be attracted to bare soil for adults of most species feed on dung or nectar, or do not egg laying).
    [Show full text]
  • Build a Bee Home in Your Backyard Australia Has Over 2,000 Solitary Bee Species Needing Homes
    Support the Pollinator Link® project Build a Bee Home in your backyard Australia has over 2,000 solitary bee species needing homes. DIY Projects Hives of small black Stingless Native Bees Tetragonula sp. have become popular in urban backyards and are increasingly important for pollination M. Fox of agricultural crops like Queensland Nuts Macadamia integrifolia. Less well known are the 2,000 species of native solitary bees: species diversity provides pollination security by reducing risks from species specific disease. Some species: Blue Banded Bees, Teddy Bear Bees and Carpenter Bees also provide a special type of pollination service called Buzz Pollination – shaking pollen out by vibrating flowers with strong wing muscles or head banging the flowers. Buzz Pollination is particularly valuable for the tomatoes, kiwi fruit, eggplants, blueberries, cranberries and chilli peppers, in your backyard vegetable garden. The European Honey Bee Apis mellifera cannot perform Buzz Pollination. Stingless native bee hive Solitary native bees come in a wide range of colours: bright orange furry Teddy A. Moore Bear Bees and shiny green Metallic Carpenter Bees; and sizes, from 12mm Blue Banded Bees to the huge loud 24mm Great Carpenter Bees. Adult solitary native bee generally only fly during the warm months and die before winter. Immature bees remain sealed in their cells inside the nests during the winter. They develop into adults and emerge in spring when the warm weather returns and your plants need pollinators. Solitary bee nests: Many solitary bees nest in burrows in the ground while others Teddy Bear Bee nest in pre-existing crevices or holes in timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Diet of Some Passerines in New South Wales 1: Fairy-Wrens to Woodswallows
    AUSTRALIAN 106 BIRD WATCHER AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1999, 18, 106-120 Notes on the Diet of Some Passerines in New South Wales 1: Fairy-wrens to Woodswallows by A.B. ROSE, Associate, The Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney, N.S.W. 2000 (present address: 61 Boundary Street, Forster, N.S.W. 2428) The following notes are incidental records of the food of some passerine species, from personal observations and from an examination of the stomach contents of birds found dead (road-kills, window-kills and cat-kills). They are intended to supplement the lists of Barker & Vestjens (1990) and Lepschi (1993) for the respective species. Records listed by Rose (1973, 1974) are not included here. Notes on non-nectar foods of some honeyeaters are published separately (Rose 1999). Stomach contents were examined microscopically, and identified by comparison with reference material and, for insects, with the aid of a manual (CSIRO 1970). Insect nomenclature follows CSIRO (1980) and, for moths, Common (1990). Superb Fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus Stomachs: Eight stomachs, from various locations, contained the following unquantified material: beetle (Coleoptera); ant (Formicidae); cricket/grasshopper (Orthoptera); fly (Diptera); butterfly/moth (Lepidoptera); bug (Hemiptera); and spider (Araneida). Splendid Fairy-wren Malurus spkndens Stomach: Rankin Springs (33°53'S, 146°14'E), 23 September 1973 (K. Muller): one small click-beetle (Elateridae ). Variegated Fairy-W..en Malurus Iamberti Stomachs: Nine stomachs, from various locations, contained the following unquantified material: beetle; ant; orthopteran; fly; butterfly/moth; bug; and spider. White-winged Fairy-wren Malurus kucopterus Stomach: Tibooburra (29"20'S, 142003'E), 1 August 1982 (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadfile/616075 Toft, J
    REVIEW published: 30 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.582041 Designing (for) Urban Food Webs Alexander J. Felson 1,2,3 and Aaron M. Ellison 4* 1 Melbourne School of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2 Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT, United States, 3 Urban Ecology and Design Lab and Ecopolitan Design, New Haven, CT, United States, 4 Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, MA, United States Interest is growing in designing resilient and ecologically rich urban environments that provide social and ecological benefits. Regenerative and biocentric designs fostering urban ecological habitats including food webs that provide ecosystem services for people and wildlife increasingly are being sought. However, the intentional design of urban landscapes for food webs remains in an early stage with few precedents and many challenges. In this paper, we explore the potential to design (for) urban food webs through collaborations between designers and ecologists. We start by examining the ecology and management of Jamaica Bay in New York City as a case study of an anthropogenic landscape where ecosystems are degraded and the integrity of extant food webs are intertwined with human agency. A subsequent design competition focusing on ecological design and management of this large-scale landscape for animal habitat and ecosystem Edited by: services for people illustrates how designers approach this anthropogenic landscape. Mary L. Cadenasso, This case study reveals that both designing urban landscapes for food webs and directly University of California, Davis, United States designing and manipulating urban food webs are complicated and challenging to achieve Reviewed by: and maintain, but they have the potential to increase ecological health of, and enhance Frederick R.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting and Creating Habitat Toattract Bees
    Bee Walls Bee Gardens Bee Habitat Bee Trees Planting and Creating Habitat toAttract Bees BLUE-BANDED SOLITARY DIANNE BY CLARKE Conserving all bees : for the health of our environment and on-going food supply Gardeners can choose a wide variety of plants to attract and support bees. Floral embrace! Some plants provide valuable supplies of nectar and pollen for the bees whilst PHOTO BOB LUttRELL others assist the bees with their nest building. Native plants are usually best for native bees, and can be used in both wild areas and gardens. There are also many garden plants - particularly heirloom varieties of perennials and herbs - that are good sources of nectar or pollen. Together with native plants, these will make a garden attractive to both pollinators and people. The need... The need for this document arose from our Valley Bees meetings. Members enquired about habitat that could be of benefit to all bees, what trees and plants to conserve and plant on their properties, how to attract pollinators to our gardens, and (for those who What is pollen? had bees as an activity) when did these plants produce nectar and pollen to provide food for bees. Pollen is the male component of the reproductive cycle of flowering A call was put out for a survey, and the knowledge of people experienced in the field was collected and collated to provide this survey of the trees in the local Mary River Catchment area. plants. It is produced in the anthers of the flowers. For fruit and seeds to We thank Ernie Rider, Kayle Findlay, Roy Barnes, Norm Salt and Pauline Alexander for their valuable form, the pollen must be transferred to the stigma to enter the ovaries.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Book of Climate Frequency Plots of Specific Bee Species Explanation Note: Frequency Plots of Identified Bee Species, Ordered by Family, for Each Climate Zone
    JHR 79: 117–144 (2020) doi: 10.3897/jhr.79.57308 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://jhr.pensoft.net Morphometric comparisons and novel observations of diurnal and low-light-foraging bees James B. Dorey1, Erinn P. Fagan-Jeffries2, Mark I. Stevens3,4, Michael P. Schwarz1 1 College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, SA, 5001, Adelaide, Australia 2 Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology & Biodiversity and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA, 5000, Adelaide, Australia 3 Biological and Earth Sciences, South Australian Museum, GPO Box 234, SA, 5001, Adelaide, Australia 4 University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, SA 5000, Australia Corresponding author: James B. Dorey ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Ohl | Received 6 August 2020 | Accepted 4 October 2020 | Published 30 October 2020 http://zoobank.org/D27A4B39-F0DD-474E-BA4B-A3C0140FECA6 Citation: Dorey JB, Fagan-Jeffries EP, Stevens MI, Schwarz MP (2020) Morphometric comparisons and novel observations of diurnal and low-light-foraging bees. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 79: 117–144. https://doi. org/10.3897/jhr.79.57308 Abstract Low-light adapted bees are substantially understudied components of the bee fauna, particularly in Aus- tralia. Whilst several species in Australia are thought to be adapted to low-light conditions, explicit records of these taxa actually foraging at twilight or night are absent from the scientific literature. We present the first observations of Australian bees foraging in low-light conditions as well as the first evidence of low-light foraging behaviour in the colletid bee subfamily, Hylaeinae. Using morphometrics of Austral- ian and more broadly-distributed diurnal, facultative low-light and obligate low-light adapted bees, we explore the use of morphological traits to objectively assess possible low-light behaviour and corroborate low-light collection events.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pollinators and Their Conservation JEZS 2017; 5(3): 1121-1131 © 2017 JEZS Received: 07-03-2017 Accepted: 08-04-2017 Showket a Dar, GM Lone, Sajad H Parey, Gh
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(3): 1121-1131 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Insect pollinators and their conservation JEZS 2017; 5(3): 1121-1131 © 2017 JEZS Received: 07-03-2017 Accepted: 08-04-2017 Showket A Dar, GM Lone, Sajad H Parey, Gh. I Hassan and Bashir A Rather Showket A Dar Department of Entomology, RTCPPPM-SKUAST-K, Abstract Srinagar, Sher-e-Kashmir To address the concerns regarding insect pollinator populations in state of Jammu and Kashmir, we University of Agricultural surveyed and interviewed local farmers to gain a better understanding of current farming practices and Science and Technology, their effects on bee populations. We also consulted a number of apiary and agricultural experts during the Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, research phase from 2012 till 2016. The final product may be concluded in this manuscript which India describes various native and managed pollinator species and their habitat requirements. The paper further suggests best management practices that have the potential to help promote the growth and stability of GM Mir these pollinator populations in Kashmir division of J &K, India. Department of Entomology, RTCPPPM-SKUAST-K, Keywords: Kashmir, bees, pollination, conservation, colony Srinagar, Sheri-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Introduction Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, Kashmir agriculture and pollination problem India Jammu and Kashmir is a hill state having varied topography and the agriculture remains the backbone of economy of state with over 65 percent of its population depends on it. Agriculture GM Lone sector contribute around 27 percent to the State's income.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzroy, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]